正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Svalbard, a remote Arctic archipelago, holds inconvenient secrets about our climate history. A new study reveals it was up to 9C warmer around 10,000 years ago when CO2 was just 260 parts per million. Despite this warmth, glaciers didn't vanish. They survived, supported by increased snowfall. Svalbard then cooled...

Electroversenet's profile picture

Electroverse

46,000 subscribers

57,000 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

A new study shows a thick ice cap in Greenland was completely ice-free just 7,000 years ago. The cap is Prudhoe Dome, which today is some 1,600 feet thick. The researchers drilled through the ice and dated the sediments below it. It turns out those sediments were once exposed to sunlight, meaning there was no ice. 7,000 years ago, summer temperatures were 3 to 5C warmer than today. This study shows, once again, that large ice losses have occurred in the recent past, caused entirely by natural climate variability - no CO2 forcing required.
0:35

A new study shows a thick ice cap in Greenland was completely ice-free just 7,000 years ago. The cap is Prudhoe Dome, which today is some 1,600 feet thick. The researchers drilled through the ice and dated the sediments below it. It turns out those sediments were once exposed to sunlight, meaning there was no ice. 7,000 years ago, summer temperatures were 3 to 5C warmer than today. This study shows, once again, that large ice losses have occurred in the recent past, caused entirely by natural climate variability - no CO2 forcing required.

Electroverse

150,316 次观看 • 6 个月前

The IPCC says snowfall should become less frequent in a warming world. Yet when Japan was buried by record snow in January 2026, the explanation changed. Researchers claimed global warming increased the snowfall. The storm itself was straightforward: a prolonged surge of Arctic air crossed the Sea of Japan, producing intense snowbands. Sapporo transport shut down. Aomori set depth records. Communities across northern Honshu were buried. And Japan's army was even deployed. Instead of simply pointing to the cold air outbreak though, researchers at Japan's Meteorological Institute instead ran climate model simulations. The models concluded warming increased snowfall by about 7%. So the theory now reads: global warming reduces snow, except when it increases snow... Under this framework, every possible outcome appears to confirm the same conclusion. "A theory that explains everything explains nothing."
0:53

The IPCC says snowfall should become less frequent in a warming world. Yet when Japan was buried by record snow in January 2026, the explanation changed. Researchers claimed global warming increased the snowfall. The storm itself was straightforward: a prolonged surge of Arctic air crossed the Sea of Japan, producing intense snowbands. Sapporo transport shut down. Aomori set depth records. Communities across northern Honshu were buried. And Japan's army was even deployed. Instead of simply pointing to the cold air outbreak though, researchers at Japan's Meteorological Institute instead ran climate model simulations. The models concluded warming increased snowfall by about 7%. So the theory now reads: global warming reduces snow, except when it increases snow... Under this framework, every possible outcome appears to confirm the same conclusion. "A theory that explains everything explains nothing."

Electroverse

14,704 次观看 • 2 个月前

Today's warming is not unusual. A new study using Antarctic ice core data reveals the roughly 1.1C warming of the past century is not unusual in Earth's climate history. The research analyzes temperatures preserved in ice cores stretching back hundreds of thousands of years. Looking at the last 20,000 years, the study finds that 16% of all centuries warmed by at least 1.1C. In other words, roughly one out of every six centuries warmed as much, or more, as the past hundred years. Also, the ice core records show temperatures rising about 12C since the last ice age, with the last interglacial period around 125,000 years ago several degrees warmer than today. The modern 1.1C century scale increase falls well within natural variability. There is nothing alarming or unprecedented or even rare occurring with Earth's climate.
0:50

Today's warming is not unusual. A new study using Antarctic ice core data reveals the roughly 1.1C warming of the past century is not unusual in Earth's climate history. The research analyzes temperatures preserved in ice cores stretching back hundreds of thousands of years. Looking at the last 20,000 years, the study finds that 16% of all centuries warmed by at least 1.1C. In other words, roughly one out of every six centuries warmed as much, or more, as the past hundred years. Also, the ice core records show temperatures rising about 12C since the last ice age, with the last interglacial period around 125,000 years ago several degrees warmer than today. The modern 1.1C century scale increase falls well within natural variability. There is nothing alarming or unprecedented or even rare occurring with Earth's climate.

Electroverse

17,876 次观看 • 2 个月前

The Guardian claims ocean warming is causing a 'staggering' collapse in marine life, but the study it cites actually shows the opposite. When a year is warmer, fish biomass is found to increase - by as much as 24%. When years turn colder, biomass falls - by around 15%. That is the observed data. To preserve the climate narrative, however, the authors then abandon real year-to-year results and switch to a modeled decadal trend. The model assigns warming a negative effect and reports a decline. That decline is not observed. It is modeled. The authors go on to admit they cannot separate temperature effects from overfishing, which is the primary, well-known driver of fish declines worldwide. Since fishing pressure is not included, the model loads losses onto temperature by default. Even though, as per the study's own data, warmer years mean more fish. The collapse exists only in the model. And the headlines.
0:50

The Guardian claims ocean warming is causing a 'staggering' collapse in marine life, but the study it cites actually shows the opposite. When a year is warmer, fish biomass is found to increase - by as much as 24%. When years turn colder, biomass falls - by around 15%. That is the observed data. To preserve the climate narrative, however, the authors then abandon real year-to-year results and switch to a modeled decadal trend. The model assigns warming a negative effect and reports a decline. That decline is not observed. It is modeled. The authors go on to admit they cannot separate temperature effects from overfishing, which is the primary, well-known driver of fish declines worldwide. Since fishing pressure is not included, the model loads losses onto temperature by default. Even though, as per the study's own data, warmer years mean more fish. The collapse exists only in the model. And the headlines.

Electroverse

13,304 次观看 • 6 个月前

Alpine glaciers were ice-free 6,000 years ago, long before industrial CO2. Known as the Holocene Thermal Maximum, the period was far warmer than today. Then, during the Little Ice Age, 1300 to 1850, glaciers advanced dramatically. Villages, farmland, even churches were swallowed by ice. The glaciers' retreat since 1850 simply marks a return to pre-Little Ice Age conditions, nothing more. The biggest driver of glacier melt is sunlight. Direct solar radiation causes sublimation - ice turning straight to vapor. And sunshine has been increasing worldwide as cloud cover has declined. Satellite data confirm more incoming solar energy reaching Earth's surface over the last few decades. This extra sunlight has resulted in modest melt in the Alps and elsewhere, while also boosting crop growth and photosynthesis. The real warning sign wouldn't be retreat. It would be sudden advance. Glaciers growing again would mean colder, harsher conditions returning. And history shows that's when life suffers most.
0:59

Alpine glaciers were ice-free 6,000 years ago, long before industrial CO2. Known as the Holocene Thermal Maximum, the period was far warmer than today. Then, during the Little Ice Age, 1300 to 1850, glaciers advanced dramatically. Villages, farmland, even churches were swallowed by ice. The glaciers' retreat since 1850 simply marks a return to pre-Little Ice Age conditions, nothing more. The biggest driver of glacier melt is sunlight. Direct solar radiation causes sublimation - ice turning straight to vapor. And sunshine has been increasing worldwide as cloud cover has declined. Satellite data confirm more incoming solar energy reaching Earth's surface over the last few decades. This extra sunlight has resulted in modest melt in the Alps and elsewhere, while also boosting crop growth and photosynthesis. The real warning sign wouldn't be retreat. It would be sudden advance. Glaciers growing again would mean colder, harsher conditions returning. And history shows that's when life suffers most.

Electroverse

22,118 次观看 • 1 个月前

Alpine glaciers were ice-free 6,000 years ago, long before industrial CO2. Known as the Holocene Thermal Maximum, the period was far warmer than today. Then, during the Little Ice Age (1300 to 1850) glaciers advanced dramatically. Villages, farmland, even churches were swallowed by ice. The glaciers' retreat since 1850 simply marks a return to pre-Little Ice Age conditions, nothing more. The biggest driver of glacier melt is sunlight. Direct solar radiation causes sublimation - ice turning straight to vapor. And sunshine has been increasing worldwide as cloud cover has declined. Satellite data confirm more incoming solar energy reaching Earth's surface over the last few decades. This extra sunlight has resulted in modest melt in the Alps and elsewhere, while also boosting crop growth and photosynthesis. The real warning sign wouldn't be retreat. It would be sudden advance. Glaciers growing again would mean colder, harsher conditions returning. History shows that's when life suffers most.
0:59

Alpine glaciers were ice-free 6,000 years ago, long before industrial CO2. Known as the Holocene Thermal Maximum, the period was far warmer than today. Then, during the Little Ice Age (1300 to 1850) glaciers advanced dramatically. Villages, farmland, even churches were swallowed by ice. The glaciers' retreat since 1850 simply marks a return to pre-Little Ice Age conditions, nothing more. The biggest driver of glacier melt is sunlight. Direct solar radiation causes sublimation - ice turning straight to vapor. And sunshine has been increasing worldwide as cloud cover has declined. Satellite data confirm more incoming solar energy reaching Earth's surface over the last few decades. This extra sunlight has resulted in modest melt in the Alps and elsewhere, while also boosting crop growth and photosynthesis. The real warning sign wouldn't be retreat. It would be sudden advance. Glaciers growing again would mean colder, harsher conditions returning. History shows that's when life suffers most.

Electroverse

25,299 次观看 • 5 个月前

In 1954, scientists told Congress the Arctic would melt within 25 to 50 years. Then 20 years later, in 1974, Time magazine warned we were heading for another ice age. By the 1990s, when that didn't happen, warming was the returning scare, with Norway's top expert saying the Arctic would be ice-free by 2007. The Centre for Biological Diversity said it would be ice-free by 2012. The BBC said by 2013. Needless to say, they were all wrong. The Arctic sea ice minimum has actually been stable for the past 18 years now. In 2008, NASA's James Hansen predicted lower Manhattan would be underwater by 2018 due to the burning of fossil fuels. Back in 1923, scientists claimed Glacier National Park would melt by 1950. Then in 2006, Al Gore said it would be gone by 2020. Yet today, the glaciers are still there, about the same size they were 35 years ago. Decade after decade, the doomsday dates change. But the climate alarmist script persists.
0:59

In 1954, scientists told Congress the Arctic would melt within 25 to 50 years. Then 20 years later, in 1974, Time magazine warned we were heading for another ice age. By the 1990s, when that didn't happen, warming was the returning scare, with Norway's top expert saying the Arctic would be ice-free by 2007. The Centre for Biological Diversity said it would be ice-free by 2012. The BBC said by 2013. Needless to say, they were all wrong. The Arctic sea ice minimum has actually been stable for the past 18 years now. In 2008, NASA's James Hansen predicted lower Manhattan would be underwater by 2018 due to the burning of fossil fuels. Back in 1923, scientists claimed Glacier National Park would melt by 1950. Then in 2006, Al Gore said it would be gone by 2020. Yet today, the glaciers are still there, about the same size they were 35 years ago. Decade after decade, the doomsday dates change. But the climate alarmist script persists.

Electroverse

30,706 次观看 • 7 天前

In 1954, scientists told Congress the Arctic would melt within 25 to 50 years. Then 20 years later, in 1974, Time magazine warned we were heading for another ice age. By the 1990s, when that didn't happen, warming was the returning scare, with Norway's top experts saying the Arctic would be ice-free by 2007. The Centre for Biological Diversity said it would be ice-free by 2012. The BBC said by 2013. Needless to say, they were all wrong. The Arctic sea ice minimum has actually been stable for the past 18 years now. In 2008, NASA's James Hansen predicted Lower Manhattan would be underwater by 2018 due to the burning of fossil fuels. Back in 1923, scientists claimed Glacier National Park would melt by 1950. Then in 2006, Al Gore said it would be gone by 2020. Yet today, the glaciers are still there about the same size they were 35 years ago. Decade after decade, the doomsday dates change, but the climate alarmist script persists.
0:59

In 1954, scientists told Congress the Arctic would melt within 25 to 50 years. Then 20 years later, in 1974, Time magazine warned we were heading for another ice age. By the 1990s, when that didn't happen, warming was the returning scare, with Norway's top experts saying the Arctic would be ice-free by 2007. The Centre for Biological Diversity said it would be ice-free by 2012. The BBC said by 2013. Needless to say, they were all wrong. The Arctic sea ice minimum has actually been stable for the past 18 years now. In 2008, NASA's James Hansen predicted Lower Manhattan would be underwater by 2018 due to the burning of fossil fuels. Back in 1923, scientists claimed Glacier National Park would melt by 1950. Then in 2006, Al Gore said it would be gone by 2020. Yet today, the glaciers are still there about the same size they were 35 years ago. Decade after decade, the doomsday dates change, but the climate alarmist script persists.

Electroverse

38,885 次观看 • 4 个月前

Australia's Bureau of Meteorology has been audited station by station. The report reveals that the agency has systematically erased cooling trends from the historical record, replacing them with synthetic warming. At Rutherglen, Victoria for example, raw data from 1913 to 2006 showed a cooling trend. But the Bureau's adjusted chart flips this into warming. No physical justification, just statistical sleight of hand. Comparisons at Deniliquin also reveals the tactic - how past highs have been lowered to fit the narrative. Minimums from 1910 onward here are reduced by as much as 1.8C. These edits weren't based on new evidence. They were applied decades later by opaque homogenization models. The report's author calls it the rewriting of Australia's temperature history. But it's not just happening in Australia. Climate agencies in the UK and US have also cooled the past so as to exaggerate or even fabricate modern warming trends. This manipulated data is then paraded as truth by politicians and the media with the original measurements buried.
1:05

Australia's Bureau of Meteorology has been audited station by station. The report reveals that the agency has systematically erased cooling trends from the historical record, replacing them with synthetic warming. At Rutherglen, Victoria for example, raw data from 1913 to 2006 showed a cooling trend. But the Bureau's adjusted chart flips this into warming. No physical justification, just statistical sleight of hand. Comparisons at Deniliquin also reveals the tactic - how past highs have been lowered to fit the narrative. Minimums from 1910 onward here are reduced by as much as 1.8C. These edits weren't based on new evidence. They were applied decades later by opaque homogenization models. The report's author calls it the rewriting of Australia's temperature history. But it's not just happening in Australia. Climate agencies in the UK and US have also cooled the past so as to exaggerate or even fabricate modern warming trends. This manipulated data is then paraded as truth by politicians and the media with the original measurements buried.

Electroverse

250,097 次观看 • 1 个月前

Just 5,000 years ago, the Arctic looked very different. During the Holocene Thermal Maximum, summers in the northern hemisphere were 3C warmer than today. And life thrived. Birch and spruce forests expanded all the way to the edges of the Arctic Ocean in places like northern Siberia and Alaska. Ancient pollen, macro fossils and soil records confirmed these weren't isolated trees. They formed sustained forests, replacing tundra with thriving ecosystems. Permafrost back then was weak, patchy or absent. Peatlands developed, supporting rich life where frozen ground would later take over. But around 5,000 years ago, colder and wetter conditions returned. This marked the neoglacial period. The trees retreated, permafrost spread. And the Arctic became the frozen, barren expanse we know today. Yet the land still remembers. Buried trunks, preserved seeds and deep peat layers tell the story of a greener, warmer north. Ignored in today's narratives is an inconvenient truth: The climate is always changing, and history shows us warmth is beneficial for life.
1:05

Just 5,000 years ago, the Arctic looked very different. During the Holocene Thermal Maximum, summers in the northern hemisphere were 3C warmer than today. And life thrived. Birch and spruce forests expanded all the way to the edges of the Arctic Ocean in places like northern Siberia and Alaska. Ancient pollen, macro fossils and soil records confirmed these weren't isolated trees. They formed sustained forests, replacing tundra with thriving ecosystems. Permafrost back then was weak, patchy or absent. Peatlands developed, supporting rich life where frozen ground would later take over. But around 5,000 years ago, colder and wetter conditions returned. This marked the neoglacial period. The trees retreated, permafrost spread. And the Arctic became the frozen, barren expanse we know today. Yet the land still remembers. Buried trunks, preserved seeds and deep peat layers tell the story of a greener, warmer north. Ignored in today's narratives is an inconvenient truth: The climate is always changing, and history shows us warmth is beneficial for life.

Electroverse

10,385 次观看 • 1 个月前

Back in 2009, the newly appointed director of the National Snow and Ice Data Center, Mark Serreze, warned that Arctic sea ice was in a death spiral. He predicted the Arctic could be ice-free by the summer of 2030, likely even earlier. Nearly two decades later, the data tell a very different story. According to the NSIDC's own records, September sea ice has shown no downward trend since 2007 - 18 years of stability. Despite rising CO2 levels and every claimed feedback mechanism, the ice is not budging. It remains right where it was in the mid-2000s. As climate researcher Javier Vinos put it, "Clearly the models on which these predictions are based do not accurately reflect the actual climate." The Arctic death spiral never happened, yet Serreze remains director of the NSIDC. There is zero accountability.
0:49

Back in 2009, the newly appointed director of the National Snow and Ice Data Center, Mark Serreze, warned that Arctic sea ice was in a death spiral. He predicted the Arctic could be ice-free by the summer of 2030, likely even earlier. Nearly two decades later, the data tell a very different story. According to the NSIDC's own records, September sea ice has shown no downward trend since 2007 - 18 years of stability. Despite rising CO2 levels and every claimed feedback mechanism, the ice is not budging. It remains right where it was in the mid-2000s. As climate researcher Javier Vinos put it, "Clearly the models on which these predictions are based do not accurately reflect the actual climate." The Arctic death spiral never happened, yet Serreze remains director of the NSIDC. There is zero accountability.

Electroverse

29,125 次观看 • 1 个月前

At the peak of the last ice age, 20,000 years ago, sea levels were 400 feet lower than today. As the ice sheets melted, oceans surged upward, rising at an average of 15 mm per year between 15,000 and 8,000 years ago. During 'Meltwater Pulse 1A', seas shot up by 50 feet in just 500 years - a foot per decade as ice sheets collapsed. But by 6,000 years ago, the Great Melt was largely complete. Since then, sea levels have been relatively stable. Yet today, we're told to believe that the last few inches are catastrophic and all our fault, not part of the natural cycles that have driven Earth's climate time immemorial. That ignores history, data and basic science. The rate of rise we've seen over the past centuries is not increasing, according to global tidal gauge data. A recent study of 204 tidal gauges worldwide found 95% show no statistical acceleration, and the few that do are explained by local land motion/subsidence - not climate change.
1:02

At the peak of the last ice age, 20,000 years ago, sea levels were 400 feet lower than today. As the ice sheets melted, oceans surged upward, rising at an average of 15 mm per year between 15,000 and 8,000 years ago. During 'Meltwater Pulse 1A', seas shot up by 50 feet in just 500 years - a foot per decade as ice sheets collapsed. But by 6,000 years ago, the Great Melt was largely complete. Since then, sea levels have been relatively stable. Yet today, we're told to believe that the last few inches are catastrophic and all our fault, not part of the natural cycles that have driven Earth's climate time immemorial. That ignores history, data and basic science. The rate of rise we've seen over the past centuries is not increasing, according to global tidal gauge data. A recent study of 204 tidal gauges worldwide found 95% show no statistical acceleration, and the few that do are explained by local land motion/subsidence - not climate change.

Electroverse

51,933 次观看 • 6 个月前

The BBC says it will review its climate coverage, not because it suddenly found integrity, but because it got caught. A leaked letter from a former standards advisor accused executives of ignoring "widespread evidence of skewed reporting." The BBC has skewed the truth for years to push a political agenda. It claimed human CO2 made US heatwaves 35 times more likely. It said wildfires were exploding because of climate change. And it sold Net Zero as an economic miracle while hiding the costs. These are all falsehoods with the data, in many cases, showing the exact opposite. And when challenged, the BBC quietly edited, deleted or buried the evidence. Even the regulator Ofcom ordered entire climate programs be pulled for dishonesty. This isn't journalism, it's propaganda. But the public is cottoning on, and switching off. In the past two years alone, roughly a million UK households have stopped paying the BBC license fee.
0:53

The BBC says it will review its climate coverage, not because it suddenly found integrity, but because it got caught. A leaked letter from a former standards advisor accused executives of ignoring "widespread evidence of skewed reporting." The BBC has skewed the truth for years to push a political agenda. It claimed human CO2 made US heatwaves 35 times more likely. It said wildfires were exploding because of climate change. And it sold Net Zero as an economic miracle while hiding the costs. These are all falsehoods with the data, in many cases, showing the exact opposite. And when challenged, the BBC quietly edited, deleted or buried the evidence. Even the regulator Ofcom ordered entire climate programs be pulled for dishonesty. This isn't journalism, it's propaganda. But the public is cottoning on, and switching off. In the past two years alone, roughly a million UK households have stopped paying the BBC license fee.

Electroverse

63,420 次观看 • 8 天前

The BBC says it will "review" its climate coverage. Not because it suddenly found integrity, but because it got caught. A leaked letter from a former standards advisor accused executives of ignoring "widespread evidence of skewed reporting." The BBC has skewed the truth for years to push a political agenda. It claimed human CO2 made US heat waves "35 times more likely," it said wildfires were exploding because of climate change, and it sold Net Zero as an economic miracle while hiding the costs. These are all falsehoods. The data, in many cases, show the exact opposite. And when challenged, the BBC quietly edited, deleted or buried the evidence. Even the regulator Ofcom ordered entire climate programs be pulled for dishonesty. This isn't journalism, it's propaganda. But the public is cottoning on and switching off. In the past two years alone, roughly a million UK households have stopped paying the BBC license fee.
0:53

The BBC says it will "review" its climate coverage. Not because it suddenly found integrity, but because it got caught. A leaked letter from a former standards advisor accused executives of ignoring "widespread evidence of skewed reporting." The BBC has skewed the truth for years to push a political agenda. It claimed human CO2 made US heat waves "35 times more likely," it said wildfires were exploding because of climate change, and it sold Net Zero as an economic miracle while hiding the costs. These are all falsehoods. The data, in many cases, show the exact opposite. And when challenged, the BBC quietly edited, deleted or buried the evidence. Even the regulator Ofcom ordered entire climate programs be pulled for dishonesty. This isn't journalism, it's propaganda. But the public is cottoning on and switching off. In the past two years alone, roughly a million UK households have stopped paying the BBC license fee.

Electroverse

77,840 次观看 • 4 个月前

.Kayleigh McEnany exposes how Democrats have been lying about climate change for years in a brutal segment exposing John Kerry, Greta Thunberg, AOC, and Barack Obama’s fear-mongering “In 1995, the New York Times predicted that most of the beaches on the East Coast of the United States would be gone in 25 years. Well, the beaches are still sandy and the ice caps are still frozen. But every major Democrat has campaign rather on climate change, using it as a scare tactic. Vote for them or the world's going to melt. And once they're in, they send huge climate contracts to their friends, to their donors, but no one's buying it anymore. Democrats have cried climate wolf so many times that even the Times is telling them to cut it out. They say Democrats don't have to campaign on climate change anymore. Turns out voters care about energy prices, not windmills, solar panels. The New York Times says it's not clear why climate should be at the center of Democrat campaigns. And even under Biden, climate wasn't a top priority for voters. A poll from 2024 had climate at the bottom of the list. And remember the Democrats' top climate warrior, Greta? Well, she moved on from fighting climate change to freeing Palestine. Is the left finally going to give up its most expensive scam? After decades of hysteria, decades of finger pointing, the polls tanked. The money dried up faster than they said our water sources would. And now all of a sudden, Democrats don't care about climate change anymore.”
2:10

.Kayleigh McEnany exposes how Democrats have been lying about climate change for years in a brutal segment exposing John Kerry, Greta Thunberg, AOC, and Barack Obama’s fear-mongering “In 1995, the New York Times predicted that most of the beaches on the East Coast of the United States would be gone in 25 years. Well, the beaches are still sandy and the ice caps are still frozen. But every major Democrat has campaign rather on climate change, using it as a scare tactic. Vote for them or the world's going to melt. And once they're in, they send huge climate contracts to their friends, to their donors, but no one's buying it anymore. Democrats have cried climate wolf so many times that even the Times is telling them to cut it out. They say Democrats don't have to campaign on climate change anymore. Turns out voters care about energy prices, not windmills, solar panels. The New York Times says it's not clear why climate should be at the center of Democrat campaigns. And even under Biden, climate wasn't a top priority for voters. A poll from 2024 had climate at the bottom of the list. And remember the Democrats' top climate warrior, Greta? Well, she moved on from fighting climate change to freeing Palestine. Is the left finally going to give up its most expensive scam? After decades of hysteria, decades of finger pointing, the polls tanked. The money dried up faster than they said our water sources would. And now all of a sudden, Democrats don't care about climate change anymore.”

Steve Guest

111,332 次观看 • 3 个月前

Retreating ice at Alaska's Mendenhall Glacier is exposing ancient tree stumps. Carbon dating places the stumps at around 1,000 to 2,000 years old. Forests once grew where ice now sits. Glaciers have been gradually pulling back since the end of the Little Ice Age, since the 1800s. As they recede, they're exposing land that was previously ice-free as recently as 1,000 years ago (when CO2 levels were far lower than they are today). We see this not only in Alaska, but across the Arctic. Retreating ice is uncovering soils, wood, and organic material. In Greenland, buried soils, plant remains, and insects have also been found beneath the ice. These are direct physical records of far warmer temperatures in the recent past. Warmth brings vegetation and biodiversity. Cold brings hardship and advancing ice sheets. It is obvious which conditions life prefers.
0:50

Retreating ice at Alaska's Mendenhall Glacier is exposing ancient tree stumps. Carbon dating places the stumps at around 1,000 to 2,000 years old. Forests once grew where ice now sits. Glaciers have been gradually pulling back since the end of the Little Ice Age, since the 1800s. As they recede, they're exposing land that was previously ice-free as recently as 1,000 years ago (when CO2 levels were far lower than they are today). We see this not only in Alaska, but across the Arctic. Retreating ice is uncovering soils, wood, and organic material. In Greenland, buried soils, plant remains, and insects have also been found beneath the ice. These are direct physical records of far warmer temperatures in the recent past. Warmth brings vegetation and biodiversity. Cold brings hardship and advancing ice sheets. It is obvious which conditions life prefers.

Electroverse

66,173 次观看 • 4 个月前

A recent study reveals sea levels are rising far slower than we've been told. Researchers examined over 200 tide gauges from around the globe. In 2020, the average sea level rise was just 1.5 mm per year, or only 6 inches per century. This rate is less than half of what the IPCC claims, which is 3 to 4 mm per year. The study found no acceleration linked to man-made climate change. Where rises were noted, they were due to local factors like land subsidence and earthquakes, not CO2 emissions. The authors called it crazy that no one had compared real data to IPCC models. Their conclusion: the IPCC's predictions significantly overestimate sea level rise. Despite the facts, the media continues to push narratives of drowning cities - a political agenda, not scientific truth.
0:52

A recent study reveals sea levels are rising far slower than we've been told. Researchers examined over 200 tide gauges from around the globe. In 2020, the average sea level rise was just 1.5 mm per year, or only 6 inches per century. This rate is less than half of what the IPCC claims, which is 3 to 4 mm per year. The study found no acceleration linked to man-made climate change. Where rises were noted, they were due to local factors like land subsidence and earthquakes, not CO2 emissions. The authors called it crazy that no one had compared real data to IPCC models. Their conclusion: the IPCC's predictions significantly overestimate sea level rise. Despite the facts, the media continues to push narratives of drowning cities - a political agenda, not scientific truth.

Electroverse

25,030 次观看 • 6 个月前