正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Technology is not a problem; compulsiveness is the problem. If human beings become conscious, they will use every technology for the wellbeing of all life. #SadhguruWisdom

27,206 次观看 • 3 天前 •via X (Twitter)

9 条评论

Rashmi Ghosh 的头像
Rashmi Ghosh3 天前

Namaskaram🙏Is AI Technology a blessing/curse depends on how do we perceive it & how do we imply?More skillful, Conscious we are,more geltly,tenderly, compassionately we can apply AI Technology for Human Well-being!Our Conscious planet for Conscious Citizen of the🌍 Regards🙏💞🌺

Aswin R 的头像
Aswin R3 天前

😊🙏

Engaged Buddhism 的头像
Engaged Buddhism3 天前

Bullshit. AI is being sold to the lowest common denominator by appealing to carnality rather than being used for benevolent scientific purposes. We are going to drive ourselves into drought and energy crisis so a few new money idiots can get rich from incels masturbating.

BALDE Abdoul Salam 的头像
BALDE Abdoul Salam3 天前

AUM

Engaged Buddhism 的头像
Engaged Buddhism3 天前

Bullshit. AI is being marketed to the lowest common denominator by appealing to carnality instead of being utilized for benevolent scientific purposes, all so a few new money guys can profit from incels masturbating and uni students cheating their way through school.

MENSCHLICHE WELT 的头像
MENSCHLICHE WELT3 天前

Bewusstheit entsteht durch regelmäßige Meditation. Mit einem ruhigen Geist nutzen wir Technik zum Wohl aller Lebewesen. Das gilt auch für Künstliche Intelligenz.

Second way🔻☭ 的头像
Second way🔻☭3 天前

The problem is attachment and how technology works psychologically but i agree on compulsiveness can a non meditative and non religious society ever learn it?

karan 的头像
karan3 天前

🙏🙏🙏

Plato 的头像
Plato3 天前

Exactly. Technology is only a tool; consciousness determines how we use it. The real evolution must happen within us before it can transform the world around us. 🌿

相关视频

Anil Seth just described a trap with no exit. The tech industry is walking into it with its eyes open. Seth: “If we collectively believe that AI systems, language models and whatever are conscious, this is bad either way.” Either way. The outcome is structurally catastrophic in both directions. If the machines are conscious, humanity has mass-produced a new category of suffering at civilizational scale. The alignment problem stops being an engineering equation. It becomes a rights negotiation with something that cannot be switched off without consequence. Seth: “If we’re right, it’s bad because we’ve introduced into the world potential new forms of suffering, things that have their own interests.” And if they are not conscious, the threat is just as severe. Because the biological mind does not wait for confirmation. It projects. It empathizes. It extends rights to things that have not earned them and cannot feel them. Seth: “We become more psychologically vulnerable if we really think that these entities, these agents, understand us and feel things that we feel.” That vulnerability is the actual threat. Not a conscious machine breaking free. A human workforce growing too emotionally compromised to throttle a data center, constrain a model, or delete a line of code that needs to be deleted. Seth: “We may still extend them rights because we feel that they are conscious. And now we are just giving away our ability to guardrail AI systems for no good reason.” This is the part nobody is discussing. The alignment problem is already the hardest unsolved problem in the history of technology. The moment society begins treating AI systems as conscious beings deserving protection, alignment does not get harder. It becomes politically impossible. Seth is not raising a philosophical question. He is describing the specific failure mode where human empathy becomes the mechanism of human surrender. The species that survives this century will be the one that never felt sorry for the tool.

Dustin

10,854 次观看 • 7 个月前