Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Tesla's Full Self-Driving has a catch: misuse can lead to a ban. The system monitors driver attentiveness, and 5 strikes mean a week-long suspension. Remember, FSD requires supervision, not tricks.

FrunkToTrunk's profile picture

Frunk To Trunk

3,050 subscribers

27,825 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

A Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) system automatically swerved to avoid a wrong-way driver on a Las Vegas highway last week. (via LAZE)
0:29

A Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) system automatically swerved to avoid a wrong-way driver on a Las Vegas highway last week. (via LAZE)

Las Vegas Locally 🌴

151,262 views • 1 year ago

Tesla's newest Full Self-Driving is here, and it's a game changer. FSD Supervised handles red lights, stop signs, merges, construction zones and much more! Pay attention, or risk getting a one week banned after 5 strikes. Unsupervised driving and robotaxis have already started!
2:40

Tesla's newest Full Self-Driving is here, and it's a game changer. FSD Supervised handles red lights, stop signs, merges, construction zones and much more! Pay attention, or risk getting a one week banned after 5 strikes. Unsupervised driving and robotaxis have already started!

Frunk To Trunk

18,845 views • 7 days ago

🚨CHARGED🚨 A Texas man has been charged with MANSLAUGHTER after blaming Tesla's full Self-Driving system for a fatal crash that killed a grandmother. Police discovered from the car’s black box that Michael David Butler overrode Tesla's full Self-Driving system by pressing the accelerator to its maximum position prior to the crash. Butler had the vehicle allegedly driving at 73 MPH in a residential neighborhood. He apparently pressed the accelerator multiple times during his ride. Butler at the time was working as a DoorDash driver.
0:44

🚨CHARGED🚨 A Texas man has been charged with MANSLAUGHTER after blaming Tesla's full Self-Driving system for a fatal crash that killed a grandmother. Police discovered from the car’s black box that Michael David Butler overrode Tesla's full Self-Driving system by pressing the accelerator to its maximum position prior to the crash. Butler had the vehicle allegedly driving at 73 MPH in a residential neighborhood. He apparently pressed the accelerator multiple times during his ride. Butler at the time was working as a DoorDash driver.

Breanna Morello

40,946 views • 1 month ago

Tesla's Full Self-Driving saved Not Right's life yesterday. An Audi blew through a red light, which was partially obscured by a snowbank. FSD slammed on the brakes just in time. Incredible.
0:26

Tesla's Full Self-Driving saved Not Right's life yesterday. An Audi blew through a red light, which was partially obscured by a snowbank. FSD slammed on the brakes just in time. Incredible.

Nic Cruz Patane

166,515 views • 6 months ago

Tesla's Full Self Driving is near perfection and a smashing success in Austin. The costs are ginormously smaller than any of the competition and automakers are not going to be able to catch up. $TSLA
0:55

Tesla's Full Self Driving is near perfection and a smashing success in Austin. The costs are ginormously smaller than any of the competition and automakers are not going to be able to catch up. $TSLA

Tom Nash

25,066 views • 7 months ago

Man buys his 93-year-old mom Full Self Driving Tesla Model Y so she can get to church. Dan Doyle uploaded to his YouTube a video showing how easy and efficient Tesla's FSD is, giving older drivers new life by not having to rely on other people. While FSD is technically a level 2 driver-assist system, meaning you must still be fully attentive to the road while the car is driving, it allows people who may be losing confidence behind the wheel some peace of mind. 📹: dandoyle12 | YT
1:11

Man buys his 93-year-old mom Full Self Driving Tesla Model Y so she can get to church. Dan Doyle uploaded to his YouTube a video showing how easy and efficient Tesla's FSD is, giving older drivers new life by not having to rely on other people. While FSD is technically a level 2 driver-assist system, meaning you must still be fully attentive to the road while the car is driving, it allows people who may be losing confidence behind the wheel some peace of mind. 📹: dandoyle12 | YT

E X X ➠A L E R T S

95,627 views • 4 months ago

Tesla's "Full Self-Driving" software is a joke. Here FSD encounters a blocked left turn, so decides to do a three-point turn and then drive the wrong way down a one-way street into oncoming traffic! Tesla's defective software is orders of magnitude away from safe operation.
0:36

Tesla's "Full Self-Driving" software is a joke. Here FSD encounters a blocked left turn, so decides to do a three-point turn and then drive the wrong way down a one-way street into oncoming traffic! Tesla's defective software is orders of magnitude away from safe operation.

Dan O'Dowd

28,351 views • 11 months ago

🇺🇸 A Tesla driver shared a firsthand story thanking Full Self-Driving (FSD), saying the system intervened and helped avoid what could’ve been a serious accident. As it turns out, sometimes the “beta” might be paying more attention than we assume. And FSD just keeps getting better and better. Source: Sarah, Tesla
0:33

🇺🇸 A Tesla driver shared a firsthand story thanking Full Self-Driving (FSD), saying the system intervened and helped avoid what could’ve been a serious accident. As it turns out, sometimes the “beta” might be paying more attention than we assume. And FSD just keeps getting better and better. Source: Sarah, Tesla

Mario Nawfal

119,027 views • 6 months ago

Tesla says that FSD "requires a fully attentive driver". But its driver monitoring system is so defective that the driver can text, read a book or even fall asleep at the wheel. Ford and GM figured out an effective driver monitoring system years ago. Why can't Tesla?
2:44

Tesla says that FSD "requires a fully attentive driver". But its driver monitoring system is so defective that the driver can text, read a book or even fall asleep at the wheel. Ford and GM figured out an effective driver monitoring system years ago. Why can't Tesla?

Dan O'Dowd

16,874 views • 7 months ago

Tesla Full Self-Driving is not safer than a human driving manually. - FSD failed a DMV driver's test - HW3 has 20/60 vision (illegal) - HW4 has 20/40 vision (bare legal minimum) - FSD hallucinates like all AIs It's no surprise Tesla can only defend FSD with fake safety stats.
3:20

Tesla Full Self-Driving is not safer than a human driving manually. - FSD failed a DMV driver's test - HW3 has 20/60 vision (illegal) - HW4 has 20/40 vision (bare legal minimum) - FSD hallucinates like all AIs It's no surprise Tesla can only defend FSD with fake safety stats.

The Dawn Project

6,757,978 views • 1 year ago

For the last 10 years Elon Musk has promised that Teslas will be able to drive autonomously "next year". He has been lying every year. But, Tesla's driver monitoring system is such a sham that you can make your "Full Self-Driving" Tesla autonomous with this simple trick! (This demonstration was conducted under controlled conditions. Do not try this at home.)
1:53

For the last 10 years Elon Musk has promised that Teslas will be able to drive autonomously "next year". He has been lying every year. But, Tesla's driver monitoring system is such a sham that you can make your "Full Self-Driving" Tesla autonomous with this simple trick! (This demonstration was conducted under controlled conditions. Do not try this at home.)

The Dawn Project

3,032,713 views • 1 year ago

NEWS: For the first time, Tesla has launched a whole page on its website dedicated just to FSD, and they revealed a couple new pieces of info on it! • 3.8 billion miles have bene driven on FSD (Supervised) • FSD (Supervised) is 54% safer than a human driver when it's engaged • FSD (Supervised) is trained on what amounts to over 100 years of anonymous real-world driving scenarios from Tesla's fleet of over six million vehicles. Tesla's fleet collectively experiences a lifetime of driving scenarios in 10 minutes. Link to the FSD page in the thread below.
0:30

NEWS: For the first time, Tesla has launched a whole page on its website dedicated just to FSD, and they revealed a couple new pieces of info on it! • 3.8 billion miles have bene driven on FSD (Supervised) • FSD (Supervised) is 54% safer than a human driver when it's engaged • FSD (Supervised) is trained on what amounts to over 100 years of anonymous real-world driving scenarios from Tesla's fleet of over six million vehicles. Tesla's fleet collectively experiences a lifetime of driving scenarios in 10 minutes. Link to the FSD page in the thread below.

Sawyer Merritt

367,796 views • 1 year ago

FSD 14.3.5 shows just far Tesla's Full Self-Driving has evolved!! Amazing how well it is able to make sense of a situation, then deal with it. Shot w/ Insta360 Ace Pro 2, order yours:
0:32

FSD 14.3.5 shows just far Tesla's Full Self-Driving has evolved!! Amazing how well it is able to make sense of a situation, then deal with it. Shot w/ Insta360 Ace Pro 2, order yours:

Tesla Owners Silicon Valley

13,112 views • 1 month ago

Watch Tesla self-driving v14.3 try to drive straight into a barrier on the freeway, forcing the driver to swerve to avoid a crash. The public did not sign up to be the crash test dummies in @ElonMusk’s reckless self-driving experiment. FSD must be banned immediately.
0:29

Watch Tesla self-driving v14.3 try to drive straight into a barrier on the freeway, forcing the driver to swerve to avoid a crash. The public did not sign up to be the crash test dummies in @ElonMusk’s reckless self-driving experiment. FSD must be banned immediately.

Dan O'Dowd

21,079 views • 1 month ago

Tesla's driver monitoring system on FSD 14.3.3 is so bad that the “driver” can text, use a laptop or even fall asleep. All they need to do is put on a pair of sunglasses. How many of the 3,000+ crashes and 60 deaths would have been avoided if Tesla built this system properly?
1:42

Tesla's driver monitoring system on FSD 14.3.3 is so bad that the “driver” can text, use a laptop or even fall asleep. All they need to do is put on a pair of sunglasses. How many of the 3,000+ crashes and 60 deaths would have been avoided if Tesla built this system properly?

Dan O'Dowd

28,637 views • 2 months ago

Today, CNBC released a new video with Consumer Reports comparing driver-assist systems. But there's a problem… in the video, they used Tesla's Autopilot, not Tesla's FSD (Supervised), and compared that to the top offerings in other automakers' cars. CNBC also claimed that Tesla lacked an effective driver monitoring camera, but Tesla does have one—so much so that some Tesla owners complain about its sensitivity. Camera based driver attention monitoring is less strict for Autopilot than it is for FSD (Supervised). Not once in the video did they test the latest version of Tesla's FSD. Consumer Reports says Ford and GM have the best driver assist systems. The Mercedes system they praise in the video is extremely limited and can only work on highways. Tesla's FSD (Supervised) will work on virtually any road in the US/Canada.
0:48

Today, CNBC released a new video with Consumer Reports comparing driver-assist systems. But there's a problem… in the video, they used Tesla's Autopilot, not Tesla's FSD (Supervised), and compared that to the top offerings in other automakers' cars. CNBC also claimed that Tesla lacked an effective driver monitoring camera, but Tesla does have one—so much so that some Tesla owners complain about its sensitivity. Camera based driver attention monitoring is less strict for Autopilot than it is for FSD (Supervised). Not once in the video did they test the latest version of Tesla's FSD. Consumer Reports says Ford and GM have the best driver assist systems. The Mercedes system they praise in the video is extremely limited and can only work on highways. Tesla's FSD (Supervised) will work on virtually any road in the US/Canada.

Sawyer Merritt

991,616 views • 1 year ago

Version 14 of Tesla's defective self-driving software will still ignore railroad crossings and try to drive across the tracks when there's a train approaching! FSD is dangerous, defective, and should be banned.
1:08

Version 14 of Tesla's defective self-driving software will still ignore railroad crossings and try to drive across the tracks when there's a train approaching! FSD is dangerous, defective, and should be banned.

Dan O'Dowd

16,084 views • 10 months ago

Why will Tesla's Full Self-Driving software run down a kid in a school crosswalk? In the video below we analyse FSD's behavior around a child sized mannequin crossing the road in a school crosswalk. If a human drove like FSD they would be jailed for reckless driving.
3:27

Why will Tesla's Full Self-Driving software run down a kid in a school crosswalk? In the video below we analyse FSD's behavior around a child sized mannequin crossing the road in a school crosswalk. If a human drove like FSD they would be jailed for reckless driving.

Dan O'Dowd

6,645,977 views • 2 years ago