正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Today, CNBC released a new video with Consumer Reports comparing driver-assist systems. But there's a problem… in the video, they used Tesla's Autopilot, not Tesla's FSD (Supervised), and compared that to the top offerings in other automakers' cars. CNBC also claimed that Tesla lacked an effective driver monitoring camera,...

991,469 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

Farzad 的头像
Farzad1 年前

@Tesla lol this has to be a parody

The Information 的头像
The Information1 年前

Elon Musk claims to have finished a 100,000-strong H100 cluster in four months. How likely is that?

Kyle Conner 的头像
Kyle Conner1 年前

@Tesla Are we sure consumers still trust consumer reports reporting?

Teslaconomics 的头像
Teslaconomics1 年前

@Tesla This is NOT a fair comparison. Tesla FSD (Supervised) should have been used. If so, there would’ve been nothing considered close!

Dan Burkland 的头像
Dan Burkland1 年前

@Tesla Consumer Reports has 0 integrity 😂

Dan 的头像
Dan1 年前

@Tesla Such a ridiculous oversight (not actually using FSD), you've got to assume it was malicious.

SSV 的头像
SSV1 年前

@Tesla 😬 they should be sued into oblivion for knowingly pushing a false narrative..freedom of press or not

Scott 的头像
Scott1 年前

@Tesla Dishonest CNBC I hope Delaware fixes their mistake so Elon can buy CNBC and 😈

Nic Cruz Patane 的头像
Nic Cruz Patane1 年前

@Tesla What a joke of a video.

Ash StroNUT 的头像
Ash StroNUT1 年前

@Tesla It raises the question of why @Tesla bothers separating Autopilot tiers (AP / sFSD). This marketing confusion is of their own making. Unify the system under one name and keep it simple. Lay people will not understand why sFSD is better than Mercedes' L3 system if it's only L2.

Overly Optimistic Future 的头像
Overly Optimistic Future1 年前

@Tesla The SAD part about all of this is that regular everyday Americans are going to see this and BELIEVE it! There are so few people that even now FSD exists let alone what it’s actually capable of. @ConsumerReports you guys are a joke for this.

相关视频