Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
Today, CNBC released a new video with Consumer Reports comparing driver-assist systems. But there's a problem… in the video, they used Tesla's Autopilot, not Tesla's FSD (Supervised), and compared that to the top offerings in other automakers' cars. CNBC also claimed that Tesla lacked an effective driver monitoring camera,... show more
991,469 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)
11 Yorum

@Tesla lol this has to be a parody

Elon Musk claims to have finished a 100,000-strong H100 cluster in four months. How likely is that?

@Tesla Are we sure consumers still trust consumer reports reporting?

@Tesla This is NOT a fair comparison. Tesla FSD (Supervised) should have been used. If so, there would’ve been nothing considered close!

@Tesla Consumer Reports has 0 integrity 😂

@Tesla Such a ridiculous oversight (not actually using FSD), you've got to assume it was malicious.

@Tesla 😬 they should be sued into oblivion for knowingly pushing a false narrative..freedom of press or not

@Tesla Dishonest CNBC I hope Delaware fixes their mistake so Elon can buy CNBC and 😈

@Tesla What a joke of a video.

@Tesla It raises the question of why @Tesla bothers separating Autopilot tiers (AP / sFSD). This marketing confusion is of their own making. Unify the system under one name and keep it simple. Lay people will not understand why sFSD is better than Mercedes' L3 system if it's only L2.

@Tesla The SAD part about all of this is that regular everyday Americans are going to see this and BELIEVE it! There are so few people that even now FSD exists let alone what it’s actually capable of. @ConsumerReports you guys are a joke for this.
