Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Thailand’s Air Force said in a statement issued Wednesday that it is prepared for “deep-strike operations inside Cambodia” if it verifies that Phnom Penh intends to keep using heavy weapons. It has already outlined “high-value military targets” and says it is ready to hit “any designated target” once it... show more

Jacob in Cambodia 🇺🇸 🇰🇭

44,619 subscribers

33,987 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Gen. Jack Keane says a power struggle is unfolding inside Iran’s leadership, warning hardliners and moderates are clashing as pressure mounts: “I think what we’re witnessing right before our eyes is a power struggle inside Iran. This power struggle is ongoing, and the question is how it will be resolved. There are a couple of paths. One is to take President Trump seriously—that if you don’t come to the negotiating table and the ceasefire ends—by the way, it ends on Wednesday, not Tuesday—and if it ends on Wednesday, he has promised to return to full combat operations.”

Gen. Jack Keane says a power struggle is unfolding inside Iran’s leadership, warning hardliners and moderates are clashing as pressure mounts: “I think what we’re witnessing right before our eyes is a power struggle inside Iran. This power struggle is ongoing, and the question is how it will be resolved. There are a couple of paths. One is to take President Trump seriously—that if you don’t come to the negotiating table and the ceasefire ends—by the way, it ends on Wednesday, not Tuesday—and if it ends on Wednesday, he has promised to return to full combat operations.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

172,015 views • 4 months ago

‼️🇬🇧🇺🇸🇮🇷 The United Kingdom has declared that it is fully prepared to defend itself after Iran warned of "consequences" if British military facilities are used to support U.S. operations against Iran. The warning specifically referenced RAF Fairford, a key Royal Air Force base that Iranian officials claim was used to support a U.S. B-1 bomber strike on targets inside Iran earlier this week. In response, the UK Ministry of Defence said Britain's armed forces remain on constant alert and are prepared to respond to any threat. "Our armed forces are ready to protect the security of the UK from any form of attack, whether on our soil or beyond. The UK is ready to defend itself 24/7," the ministry said. The exchange marks another escalation in tensions, raising concerns that countries providing logistical or military support to U.S. operations could increasingly become part of Iran's deterrence strategy as the regional crisis deepens. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

‼️🇬🇧🇺🇸🇮🇷 The United Kingdom has declared that it is fully prepared to defend itself after Iran warned of "consequences" if British military facilities are used to support U.S. operations against Iran. The warning specifically referenced RAF Fairford, a key Royal Air Force base that Iranian officials claim was used to support a U.S. B-1 bomber strike on targets inside Iran earlier this week. In response, the UK Ministry of Defence said Britain's armed forces remain on constant alert and are prepared to respond to any threat. "Our armed forces are ready to protect the security of the UK from any form of attack, whether on our soil or beyond. The UK is ready to defend itself 24/7," the ministry said. The exchange marks another escalation in tensions, raising concerns that countries providing logistical or military support to U.S. operations could increasingly become part of Iran's deterrence strategy as the regional crisis deepens. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

81,142 views • 27 days ago

MacCallum: The president has the right to take military action for 60 days. Crow: If there is an imminent threat and there is no imminent threat. MacCallum: That might be your opinion. Crow: I sit on the armed services and intelligence committees and if there are imminent threats they have the obligation to tell us about it. I have seen no imminent threat

MacCallum: The president has the right to take military action for 60 days. Crow: If there is an imminent threat and there is no imminent threat. MacCallum: That might be your opinion. Crow: I sit on the armed services and intelligence committees and if there are imminent threats they have the obligation to tell us about it. I have seen no imminent threat

Acyn

1,265,441 views • 5 months ago

'The coalition of the willing wants to force Russia to make concessions' – BBC 'Ukraine has already lost many lives defending its territory. There is no sign that Russia is ready to stop hostilities, so Europe understands that peace is not yet near. Now all attention is focused on raising the cost for Russia, making it take negotiations more seriously, bringing it to the negotiating table, and leading to a situation where it is truly ready to make concessions.' - SK

'The coalition of the willing wants to force Russia to make concessions' – BBC 'Ukraine has already lost many lives defending its territory. There is no sign that Russia is ready to stop hostilities, so Europe understands that peace is not yet near. Now all attention is focused on raising the cost for Russia, making it take negotiations more seriously, bringing it to the negotiating table, and leading to a situation where it is truly ready to make concessions.' - SK

Zlatti71

37,615 views • 10 months ago

We do not have to choose – whether we strike a military target or energy. He sells this energy. He sells oil. So is it energy, or is it a military target? Honestly, it’s the same thing. He sells oil, takes the money, invests it in weapons. And with those weapons, he kills Ukrainians. What is a Ukrainian supposed to do? There are two ways. We either build weapons and strike their weapons. Or we strike the source where their money is generated and multiplied. And that source is their energy sector. That is what is happening. All of this is a legitimate target for us. And who else could have done this to the Russians before us? No one.

We do not have to choose – whether we strike a military target or energy. He sells this energy. He sells oil. So is it energy, or is it a military target? Honestly, it’s the same thing. He sells oil, takes the money, invests it in weapons. And with those weapons, he kills Ukrainians. What is a Ukrainian supposed to do? There are two ways. We either build weapons and strike their weapons. Or we strike the source where their money is generated and multiplied. And that source is their energy sector. That is what is happening. All of this is a legitimate target for us. And who else could have done this to the Russians before us? No one.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

369,547 views • 6 months ago

An Amazon Prime Air delivery drone crashed in Richardson, TX, on Wednesday after it apparently hit a building. The Federal Aviation Administration is investigating, and in a statement to CBS News Amazon said that they "apologize for any inconvenience and are actively investigating the cause of this incident.”

An Amazon Prime Air delivery drone crashed in Richardson, TX, on Wednesday after it apparently hit a building. The Federal Aviation Administration is investigating, and in a statement to CBS News Amazon said that they "apologize for any inconvenience and are actively investigating the cause of this incident.”

CBS News

48,671 views • 6 months ago

A promise to hunt terrorist down wherever they may be was made and Israel intends to keep it. Prime Minister Netanyahu has already said that he is in our sights in August.

A promise to hunt terrorist down wherever they may be was made and Israel intends to keep it. Prime Minister Netanyahu has already said that he is in our sights in August.

Mossad Commentary

69,469 views • 2 years ago

Cotton: Anyone who says that we are already in a quagmire or that president cannot succeed because of the threat that Iran poses to Hormuz is akin to saying Eisenhower is losing because he hadn’t made it to Berlin within two days of D-Day. It will take some time.

Cotton: Anyone who says that we are already in a quagmire or that president cannot succeed because of the threat that Iran poses to Hormuz is akin to saying Eisenhower is losing because he hadn’t made it to Berlin within two days of D-Day. It will take some time.

Acyn

100,230 views • 5 months ago

Israel says it is locked and loaded to restart the war with Iran, stating that Iran has a plan to blow up their entire country. Israel says it already has the targets locked and is now waiting for a green light from the United States. Israel says it will bring Iran back to the Stone Age and destroy them once and for all.

Israel says it is locked and loaded to restart the war with Iran, stating that Iran has a plan to blow up their entire country. Israel says it already has the targets locked and is now waiting for a green light from the United States. Israel says it will bring Iran back to the Stone Age and destroy them once and for all.

Shadow of Ezra

138,166 views • 3 months ago

🇸🇪🇺🇦 Ukraine’s Lesson: Why the F 35 Is the Wrong Tool for a Real War Modern air power debates often obsess over the most advanced aircraft. Ukraine has learned something far more important: war is not about the most impressive jet. It is about which aircraft can keep flying when everything around it is under attack. That is why Ukraine is looking toward a future built around the Gripen E. Ukraine could have continued with F 16s and Mirage 2000s. They already have experience, infrastructure, and trained personnel. Instead, they are prioritizing a fighter designed from the ground up for survival in a hostile, missile saturated environment. That choice tells you everything you need to know. Gripen E represents a different logic. It is not built to depend on large, permanent air bases. It is built to disappear. A useful way to understand the problem with the F 35 is to imagine a luxury hospital operating room. It is filled with world class equipment and brilliant specialists. But it only works inside a clean, stable building with uninterrupted power, supply chains, and security. Move that same equipment into the middle of a disaster zone, and it quickly becomes fragile. The F 35 works best inside a controlled ecosystem: long runways, heavy maintenance, predictable logistics, and time on the ground between missions. In a real war, those conditions are exactly what the enemy targets first. Gripen E is closer to a battlefield field hospital. It is designed to operate with minimal support, from short and improvised runways, with fast turnaround and a small, mobile crew. It can land, refuel, rearm, and take off again before the enemy has time to react. And it does not need to return to the same place twice. That difference is decisive. When air bases are under constant surveillance and missile threat, survivability comes from dispersion and tempo. Gripen E can take off from unexpected locations, strike, land somewhere else entirely, and be ready again quickly. That makes it hard to track, hard to target, and hard to neutralize. This is not about generation labels. The F 35 is a fifth generation fighter. Gripen E is often described as generation 4.5, but it integrates key technologies normally associated with newer generations. More importantly, it is cheap enough to fly often and simple enough to keep in the air. Ukraine understands this because it has no choice. It has learned that air power is not about having the most advanced aircraft. It is about having aircraft that survive the first strike, the second strike, and the hundredth strike. That is why the lesson from Ukraine is uncomfortable but clear: the F 35 may be impressive, but in a real war, it is the wrong tool to rely on alone. Stay connected, Follow Gandalv Gandalv

🇸🇪🇺🇦 Ukraine’s Lesson: Why the F 35 Is the Wrong Tool for a Real War Modern air power debates often obsess over the most advanced aircraft. Ukraine has learned something far more important: war is not about the most impressive jet. It is about which aircraft can keep flying when everything around it is under attack. That is why Ukraine is looking toward a future built around the Gripen E. Ukraine could have continued with F 16s and Mirage 2000s. They already have experience, infrastructure, and trained personnel. Instead, they are prioritizing a fighter designed from the ground up for survival in a hostile, missile saturated environment. That choice tells you everything you need to know. Gripen E represents a different logic. It is not built to depend on large, permanent air bases. It is built to disappear. A useful way to understand the problem with the F 35 is to imagine a luxury hospital operating room. It is filled with world class equipment and brilliant specialists. But it only works inside a clean, stable building with uninterrupted power, supply chains, and security. Move that same equipment into the middle of a disaster zone, and it quickly becomes fragile. The F 35 works best inside a controlled ecosystem: long runways, heavy maintenance, predictable logistics, and time on the ground between missions. In a real war, those conditions are exactly what the enemy targets first. Gripen E is closer to a battlefield field hospital. It is designed to operate with minimal support, from short and improvised runways, with fast turnaround and a small, mobile crew. It can land, refuel, rearm, and take off again before the enemy has time to react. And it does not need to return to the same place twice. That difference is decisive. When air bases are under constant surveillance and missile threat, survivability comes from dispersion and tempo. Gripen E can take off from unexpected locations, strike, land somewhere else entirely, and be ready again quickly. That makes it hard to track, hard to target, and hard to neutralize. This is not about generation labels. The F 35 is a fifth generation fighter. Gripen E is often described as generation 4.5, but it integrates key technologies normally associated with newer generations. More importantly, it is cheap enough to fly often and simple enough to keep in the air. Ukraine understands this because it has no choice. It has learned that air power is not about having the most advanced aircraft. It is about having aircraft that survive the first strike, the second strike, and the hundredth strike. That is why the lesson from Ukraine is uncomfortable but clear: the F 35 may be impressive, but in a real war, it is the wrong tool to rely on alone. Stay connected, Follow Gandalv Gandalv

Gandalv

201,392 views • 6 months ago

I am not yet coming to any definitive conclusions on the strike that killed the schoolgirls in Iran. There is mutually conflicting information, and we have seen these types of tragedies get weaponized and propagandized. If it was the result of an American strike, I have no doubt it was not deliberate. From what I understand, the school was adjacent to an IRGC “target”. It is possible it was struck by accident, or tangentially as part of an attack on an IRGC target (setting aside arguments that Iran would have placed a girls school adjacent to an IRGC establishment for these specific reasons, or that any strike on an IRGC target should not have occurred if there was a school in the vicinity). It is also possible it was struck by an errant Iranian missile. The problem with Trump’s answer - or more specifically from the follow-up answer from Hegseth, is that Hegseth’s answer “we’re certainly investigating” undermines Trump’s statement. I am not one of those who believes the US deliberately targets children. Civilian death, and the death of children, is the inevitable consequence of these wars. How many tens of thousands of innocent children were killed in Iraq? And how heinously has Madeleine Albright’s assertion that “it was worth it” aged… These were our very concerns with this type of war.

I am not yet coming to any definitive conclusions on the strike that killed the schoolgirls in Iran. There is mutually conflicting information, and we have seen these types of tragedies get weaponized and propagandized. If it was the result of an American strike, I have no doubt it was not deliberate. From what I understand, the school was adjacent to an IRGC “target”. It is possible it was struck by accident, or tangentially as part of an attack on an IRGC target (setting aside arguments that Iran would have placed a girls school adjacent to an IRGC establishment for these specific reasons, or that any strike on an IRGC target should not have occurred if there was a school in the vicinity). It is also possible it was struck by an errant Iranian missile. The problem with Trump’s answer - or more specifically from the follow-up answer from Hegseth, is that Hegseth’s answer “we’re certainly investigating” undermines Trump’s statement. I am not one of those who believes the US deliberately targets children. Civilian death, and the death of children, is the inevitable consequence of these wars. How many tens of thousands of innocent children were killed in Iraq? And how heinously has Madeleine Albright’s assertion that “it was worth it” aged… These were our very concerns with this type of war.

Viva Frei

52,211 views • 5 months ago

Is this a sick joke? But listen to her opening words- “the one who is most interested in it is my husband he just wanted to know how much money it is and if he has to pay tax” That says it all.

Is this a sick joke? But listen to her opening words- “the one who is most interested in it is my husband he just wanted to know how much money it is and if he has to pay tax” That says it all.

Earth Hippy 🌎🕊️💚

103,225 views • 10 months ago

I stood on the steps of the Supreme Court Monday . Donald Trump has done real things for MAHA. I believe that. But when the Department of Justice shows up to defend Bayer and Monsanto against the American people, against the health of our children, I have to say: you got this one wrong. Liability protection for corporations that poison people is not a conservative value. It is not a Republican value. It is not a Democratic value. It is not an American value. It is the opposite of a free market. It is the government putting its thumb on the scale for corporations that are losing in court because their products are causing cancer. Every child in this country deserves to be healthy. That is not a political statement. That is the only statement that matters. So in the words of the President himself: we are going to fight, fight.

I stood on the steps of the Supreme Court Monday . Donald Trump has done real things for MAHA. I believe that. But when the Department of Justice shows up to defend Bayer and Monsanto against the American people, against the health of our children, I have to say: you got this one wrong. Liability protection for corporations that poison people is not a conservative value. It is not a Republican value. It is not a Democratic value. It is not an American value. It is the opposite of a free market. It is the government putting its thumb on the scale for corporations that are losing in court because their products are causing cancer. Every child in this country deserves to be healthy. That is not a political statement. That is the only statement that matters. So in the words of the President himself: we are going to fight, fight.

Del Bigtree

147,493 views • 3 months ago

Difficulty and value are inexorably linked. The only thing that gives said objective value at all is its difficulty. If money was everywhere, along with huge piles of gold, on every street corner - it would have no value at all. Understand that it is the difficulty that delivers the DESIRE at all. YOU WOULDN’T WANT IT IF IT WASN’T HARD. Therefore... Complaining that it’s hard is a LOGIC FAIL. People complaining about things being hard is as stupid as complaining things are valuable. "Getting a 6 pack is hard" = "Getting a 6 pack is valuable" Be glad it’s hard. If it wasn’t you wouldn’t want it. Or you’d already have it along with everyone else and nobody would care. Hard to make a million bucks, that’s why it’s worth..... a million bucks. If it wasn’t, it wouldn’t be. I always say to replace the word HAVE with GET for an instant mindset shift. "I GET to go to work today" Here’s another: Replace the word HARD with IMPORTANT and you will instantly see how motivation appears from thin air. "Making money is important" "Being in good shape is important" Yes. It is. This allows you to eliminate the need for willpower, experience the world in a new light, and find a mental fortitude you never knew existed. Now... What will you do with it? Learn more:

Difficulty and value are inexorably linked. The only thing that gives said objective value at all is its difficulty. If money was everywhere, along with huge piles of gold, on every street corner - it would have no value at all. Understand that it is the difficulty that delivers the DESIRE at all. YOU WOULDN’T WANT IT IF IT WASN’T HARD. Therefore... Complaining that it’s hard is a LOGIC FAIL. People complaining about things being hard is as stupid as complaining things are valuable. "Getting a 6 pack is hard" = "Getting a 6 pack is valuable" Be glad it’s hard. If it wasn’t you wouldn’t want it. Or you’d already have it along with everyone else and nobody would care. Hard to make a million bucks, that’s why it’s worth..... a million bucks. If it wasn’t, it wouldn’t be. I always say to replace the word HAVE with GET for an instant mindset shift. "I GET to go to work today" Here’s another: Replace the word HARD with IMPORTANT and you will instantly see how motivation appears from thin air. "Making money is important" "Being in good shape is important" Yes. It is. This allows you to eliminate the need for willpower, experience the world in a new light, and find a mental fortitude you never knew existed. Now... What will you do with it? Learn more:

Andrew Tate

3,361,252 views • 3 years ago

🚨 This radical leftist is soliciting followers to send him firearms and declaring he is prepared to “make a spectacle” for 03/07. This is not protected speech; it is a direct and imminent threat that demands swift law enforcement action. Serious escalation underway. FBI

🚨 This radical leftist is soliciting followers to send him firearms and declaring he is prepared to “make a spectacle” for 03/07. This is not protected speech; it is a direct and imminent threat that demands swift law enforcement action. Serious escalation underway. FBI

LetsGoBFLO

201,657 views • 6 months ago

"HELL IS COMING TO THE MIDDLE EAST" Iran has issued multiple severe warnings to the United States and Israel, following a year of direct military conflict and a recent domestic crisis. These warnings include threats of preemptive strikes and promises of a "crushing" response to any further military action or interference in its internal affairs. On January 6, Iran’s reestablished Supreme National Defense Council warned it may act before an attack if it detects "tangible signs" of a threat. It stated that Iran’s security and territorial integrity are an "uncrossable red line". I think Iran realizes what is about to happen...... I am convinced that the U.S. government is gearing up for a confrontation with China, which implies that Iran needs to be neutralized prior to the onset of that conflict. Hell is coming to the Middle East. Prepare for impact!

"HELL IS COMING TO THE MIDDLE EAST" Iran has issued multiple severe warnings to the United States and Israel, following a year of direct military conflict and a recent domestic crisis. These warnings include threats of preemptive strikes and promises of a "crushing" response to any further military action or interference in its internal affairs. On January 6, Iran’s reestablished Supreme National Defense Council warned it may act before an attack if it detects "tangible signs" of a threat. It stated that Iran’s security and territorial integrity are an "uncrossable red line". I think Iran realizes what is about to happen...... I am convinced that the U.S. government is gearing up for a confrontation with China, which implies that Iran needs to be neutralized prior to the onset of that conflict. Hell is coming to the Middle East. Prepare for impact!

WORLD AT WAR

188,081 views • 7 months ago