Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The basic idea behind "UFO physics" is very simple. We can get a strong "upward" force from a fast-spinning magnet (or magnetic flywheel), because it "pushes against space" like a spinning gyroscope. Very easy, if we apply a rotating magnetic field (3 or 5-phase) to that magnet! The problem...

RedCollie1's profile picture

Red Collie (Dr. Horace Drew) scientist/inventor

49,287 subscribers

29,769 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииНовости и политикаОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Here is a KEY experiment, which may determine whether we truly understand the physics of "UFO levitation"? In movie 1, we can see that lowering a spinning wheel will make a large base-wheel turn anti-clockwise. Or if we raise the same spinning wheel, that will make a large base-wheel turn clockwise. Now let's turn the experiment around! Instead of lowering or raising an upper spinning wheel, we can apply an external force, that makes the large base-wheel turn anti-clockwise, or else clockwise. What happens then to the upper spinning wheel? Will it still go up or down as before? 🥳🛸 In slide 2, we can see one of many examples drawn in crops (by friendly aliens), to suggest that "spinning one wheel" (say a large base-wheel) will cause another spinning wheel (say a small upper wheel) to "lift up". Such a novel "lifting motion" will not cause any downward Newtonian action-reaction, because all of the force is applied as a horizontal spin-torque to the large base-wheel. It seems like "magic", but that may be how Nature works! I will do this critical experiment in a few weeks, once some needed parts arrive. Meanwhile if other inventors would like to have a go, please feel free, and communicate your new results here. 🛸
0:21

Here is a KEY experiment, which may determine whether we truly understand the physics of "UFO levitation"? In movie 1, we can see that lowering a spinning wheel will make a large base-wheel turn anti-clockwise. Or if we raise the same spinning wheel, that will make a large base-wheel turn clockwise. Now let's turn the experiment around! Instead of lowering or raising an upper spinning wheel, we can apply an external force, that makes the large base-wheel turn anti-clockwise, or else clockwise. What happens then to the upper spinning wheel? Will it still go up or down as before? 🥳🛸 In slide 2, we can see one of many examples drawn in crops (by friendly aliens), to suggest that "spinning one wheel" (say a large base-wheel) will cause another spinning wheel (say a small upper wheel) to "lift up". Such a novel "lifting motion" will not cause any downward Newtonian action-reaction, because all of the force is applied as a horizontal spin-torque to the large base-wheel. It seems like "magic", but that may be how Nature works! I will do this critical experiment in a few weeks, once some needed parts arrive. Meanwhile if other inventors would like to have a go, please feel free, and communicate your new results here. 🛸

Red Collie (Dr. Horace Drew) scientist/inventor

13,845 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

In this 4th video, I build a new apparatus to show that friendly aliens REALLY DID tell us how to reproduce UFO levitation (on a small scale), by drawing technical diagrams in crops! Placing an elastic, silicone bead over the spinning magnet is essential to capturing its rising force, like for a "top". The central rod spins opposite to the magnet at low speeds (as seen by Edwin Fuhr for a nearby UFO in 1974), but hardly spins at all at high speeds, when the spinning magnet rises up. The "anti-gravity" upward force for this small magnet feels quite large, maybe 300-500 grams, to be measured accurately soon. 😆🛸
6:43

In this 4th video, I build a new apparatus to show that friendly aliens REALLY DID tell us how to reproduce UFO levitation (on a small scale), by drawing technical diagrams in crops! Placing an elastic, silicone bead over the spinning magnet is essential to capturing its rising force, like for a "top". The central rod spins opposite to the magnet at low speeds (as seen by Edwin Fuhr for a nearby UFO in 1974), but hardly spins at all at high speeds, when the spinning magnet rises up. The "anti-gravity" upward force for this small magnet feels quite large, maybe 300-500 grams, to be measured accurately soon. 😆🛸

Red Collie (Dr. Horace Drew) scientist/inventor

52,400 просмотров • 1 год назад

This 7-minute video shows my second attempt to reproduce the UFO-like levitation of that Buga orb-sphere. We do see small and reproducible anti-gravity effects of 30 to 50 grams, yet much of the upward spinning force of 500 grams (for this small magnet at 20-30 Hertz) seems to be cancelled by a downward reaction of some kind! Thus we still need one more step to get upward, POWERFUL, UFO-like levitation. I show and discuss two possible approaches near the 5-minute time. It is hard to say which approach might be best, because NONE of what you can see here is in the current physics literature or textbooks. What do YOU think? What should I try next?🛸
7:33

This 7-minute video shows my second attempt to reproduce the UFO-like levitation of that Buga orb-sphere. We do see small and reproducible anti-gravity effects of 30 to 50 grams, yet much of the upward spinning force of 500 grams (for this small magnet at 20-30 Hertz) seems to be cancelled by a downward reaction of some kind! Thus we still need one more step to get upward, POWERFUL, UFO-like levitation. I show and discuss two possible approaches near the 5-minute time. It is hard to say which approach might be best, because NONE of what you can see here is in the current physics literature or textbooks. What do YOU think? What should I try next?🛸

Red Collie (Dr. Horace Drew) scientist/inventor

22,644 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 NOW: President Trump takes huge VICTORY LAP on the success of Space Force — which some Democrats MOCKED Space Force is now vastly improving the accuracy of our weapons on the ground. And we're leading China and Russia, easily 🔥 "I'm very proud of the Space Force because that was a branch that a new one that came up, and we were losing to Russia and to China in space." "Space Force is now leading the other countries, China, Russia, and there is no fourth, really, and leading them by, we saw numbers the other day, leading, we're leading in space by so much it's, we're never going to be caught. So I'm very proud of Space Force!" "I think it's going to be one of our most important as time goes by. A lot of the things that you see, a lot of the accuracy of the weapons is caused because of what we created with Space Force, so we're very proud of that."
1:05

🚨 NOW: President Trump takes huge VICTORY LAP on the success of Space Force — which some Democrats MOCKED Space Force is now vastly improving the accuracy of our weapons on the ground. And we're leading China and Russia, easily 🔥 "I'm very proud of the Space Force because that was a branch that a new one that came up, and we were losing to Russia and to China in space." "Space Force is now leading the other countries, China, Russia, and there is no fourth, really, and leading them by, we saw numbers the other day, leading, we're leading in space by so much it's, we're never going to be caught. So I'm very proud of Space Force!" "I think it's going to be one of our most important as time goes by. A lot of the things that you see, a lot of the accuracy of the weapons is caused because of what we created with Space Force, so we're very proud of that."

Eric Daugherty

15,034 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Here is a quick trailer for my new lab experiment, which will be explained fully in Movies 1, 2 and 3 posted in comments below. I do not intend to answer the dumb comments of abusive people, but will just point out that a fast-spinning magnet acts like a gyroscope, and thus is capable of "pushing against space", if we apply a 3-phase rotational force to it in a wobbling fashion. Right in front of your eyes. The data speak for themselves. Please continue to Movies 1, 2 and 3 in that order (posted in comments) if you wish to learn more? Thank you. This is how REAL SCIENCE is done, not by asking A.I. 🛸
0:55

Here is a quick trailer for my new lab experiment, which will be explained fully in Movies 1, 2 and 3 posted in comments below. I do not intend to answer the dumb comments of abusive people, but will just point out that a fast-spinning magnet acts like a gyroscope, and thus is capable of "pushing against space", if we apply a 3-phase rotational force to it in a wobbling fashion. Right in front of your eyes. The data speak for themselves. Please continue to Movies 1, 2 and 3 in that order (posted in comments) if you wish to learn more? Thank you. This is how REAL SCIENCE is done, not by asking A.I. 🛸

Red Collie (Dr. Horace Drew) scientist/inventor

41,236 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Let's add a little more "alien physics" here! A woman in the Czech Republic 2018 had an alien friend. She asked him "how do your UFOs fly?" Her alien friend responded that he would draw a picture in crops, not far from her home, in the following summer to explain the physics. Sure enough, that crop picture appeared near Bohdankov on July 7, 2018 (see slide 1). It showed a big wire-coil magnet below, along with some conductive fluid (galinstan?) spinning above by a Lorentz force. I simulated the crop picture (see video 2) using salt water, green food dye, and 50 volts of DC power over a magnet. Those elements alone do not cause a UFO to fly! Yet if we add three, 3-phase wire coils around that spinning fluid, it supposedly causes the fluid (or a second magnet) to LIFT UP! I am building the needed devices, and plan to test soon. Expand your thinking.🛸
0:46

Let's add a little more "alien physics" here! A woman in the Czech Republic 2018 had an alien friend. She asked him "how do your UFOs fly?" Her alien friend responded that he would draw a picture in crops, not far from her home, in the following summer to explain the physics. Sure enough, that crop picture appeared near Bohdankov on July 7, 2018 (see slide 1). It showed a big wire-coil magnet below, along with some conductive fluid (galinstan?) spinning above by a Lorentz force. I simulated the crop picture (see video 2) using salt water, green food dye, and 50 volts of DC power over a magnet. Those elements alone do not cause a UFO to fly! Yet if we add three, 3-phase wire coils around that spinning fluid, it supposedly causes the fluid (or a second magnet) to LIFT UP! I am building the needed devices, and plan to test soon. Expand your thinking.🛸

Red Collie (Dr. Horace Drew) scientist/inventor

205,430 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Do you "get" it yet? THIS is how it is done. 🛸 9 wire coils around the outside are given 3-phase power in series as U-V-W-U-V-W-U-V-W. That causes a ring of 24 small magnets arranged as NN-SS-NN-SS-NN-SS-etc to spin rapidly in a direction opposite to the rotating magnetic field, so as to provide counter-spin, relative to another magnet which is spinning forward and upward at the center of the craft. More lab videos soon! Waiting for parts to arrive. Many thanks to Normal Paulsen and Thomas Valone.
0:10

Do you "get" it yet? THIS is how it is done. 🛸 9 wire coils around the outside are given 3-phase power in series as U-V-W-U-V-W-U-V-W. That causes a ring of 24 small magnets arranged as NN-SS-NN-SS-NN-SS-etc to spin rapidly in a direction opposite to the rotating magnetic field, so as to provide counter-spin, relative to another magnet which is spinning forward and upward at the center of the craft. More lab videos soon! Waiting for parts to arrive. Many thanks to Normal Paulsen and Thomas Valone.

Red Collie (Dr. Horace Drew) scientist/inventor

37,786 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

NEW PHYSICS! ANY "GENIUSES" OUT THERE WILL HAVE A CHANCE TO PROPOSE THE FIRST THEORY, TO EXPLAIN THESE NOVEL OBSERVATIONS. In many previous videos, I showed you how a permanent disc-magnet spins in the SAME direction as a 3-phase magnetic field (placed below), and rises up. What happens if we use an aluminum disc instead? By itself, an aluminum disc won't spin, because it has no internal magnetic field (which is needed to interact with the 3-phase field below). Yet if we add BOTH an aluminum disc, and also a large wire coil with AC power, then a magnetic field will be induced in that aluminum disc, and it becomes able to spin! The next question becomes: in which DIRECTION does the aluminum disc spin, with its induced magnetic field? Physics "geniuses", please watch this video to find out! Feel free to propose a new theory to explain these strange observations. We find that a large aluminum disc (100 mm diameter) spins clockwise, in the SAME sense as a rotating magnetic field below. Whereas a small aluminum disc (70 mm diameter) spins anti-clockwise, in an OPPOSITE sense to the rotating field below, Why has no one noticed this before? Mainstream physicists today just memorize old equations from textbooks, and could not discover "fleas on a dog".🤡 I suspect that these new data support a "vortex" theory of magnetism, but will let YOU decide! 😀
4:35

NEW PHYSICS! ANY "GENIUSES" OUT THERE WILL HAVE A CHANCE TO PROPOSE THE FIRST THEORY, TO EXPLAIN THESE NOVEL OBSERVATIONS. In many previous videos, I showed you how a permanent disc-magnet spins in the SAME direction as a 3-phase magnetic field (placed below), and rises up. What happens if we use an aluminum disc instead? By itself, an aluminum disc won't spin, because it has no internal magnetic field (which is needed to interact with the 3-phase field below). Yet if we add BOTH an aluminum disc, and also a large wire coil with AC power, then a magnetic field will be induced in that aluminum disc, and it becomes able to spin! The next question becomes: in which DIRECTION does the aluminum disc spin, with its induced magnetic field? Physics "geniuses", please watch this video to find out! Feel free to propose a new theory to explain these strange observations. We find that a large aluminum disc (100 mm diameter) spins clockwise, in the SAME sense as a rotating magnetic field below. Whereas a small aluminum disc (70 mm diameter) spins anti-clockwise, in an OPPOSITE sense to the rotating field below, Why has no one noticed this before? Mainstream physicists today just memorize old equations from textbooks, and could not discover "fleas on a dog".🤡 I suspect that these new data support a "vortex" theory of magnetism, but will let YOU decide! 😀

Red Collie (Dr. Horace Drew) scientist/inventor

26,679 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

In all four of these great videos from 1970, Laithwaite showed that rotation of a special kind (called "precession") can lift against downward gravity, and even more so when the speed of rotation is increased! We have been using 3-phase power to make disc magnets spin rapidly, around and up a pole. Yet those changes only increase gravitational "potential" energy, and do not act continuously against gravity itself (as we need for a "flying UFO"). None of the systems studied by Laithwaite were "magnetic". He used a power-drill to make his gyroscopes spin. Our 3-phase systems are of course more elegant, but still we can learn a lot about gravity physics, by studying Laithwaite's old results! I will be trying next to incorporate his proven anti-gravity methods into our model devices, but am not yet sure how to do it. It is an "alien IQ test", one might say. We have to "solve" that test to "fly". 🛸
0:39

In all four of these great videos from 1970, Laithwaite showed that rotation of a special kind (called "precession") can lift against downward gravity, and even more so when the speed of rotation is increased! We have been using 3-phase power to make disc magnets spin rapidly, around and up a pole. Yet those changes only increase gravitational "potential" energy, and do not act continuously against gravity itself (as we need for a "flying UFO"). None of the systems studied by Laithwaite were "magnetic". He used a power-drill to make his gyroscopes spin. Our 3-phase systems are of course more elegant, but still we can learn a lot about gravity physics, by studying Laithwaite's old results! I will be trying next to incorporate his proven anti-gravity methods into our model devices, but am not yet sure how to do it. It is an "alien IQ test", one might say. We have to "solve" that test to "fly". 🛸

Red Collie (Dr. Horace Drew) scientist/inventor

12,810 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

You can see here a NEW video, which shows the second critical step, of trying to make a UFO-propulsion drive from a spinning vortex of the liquid metal "galinstan". The spin force is a bit weak with 11 "thin" magnets around the outside, but am I try to reduce total weight. We will learn whether this idea works on the third and final step (soon). 🛸
1:49

You can see here a NEW video, which shows the second critical step, of trying to make a UFO-propulsion drive from a spinning vortex of the liquid metal "galinstan". The spin force is a bit weak with 11 "thin" magnets around the outside, but am I try to reduce total weight. We will learn whether this idea works on the third and final step (soon). 🛸

Red Collie (Dr. Horace Drew) scientist/inventor

101,078 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

David Friedberg: “ I believe 100% in ending the federal student loan program.” “I think that it will force a restructuring of the higher education system in the United States, which no one wants to hear, no one wants to do, and everyone is against.” “But I think it is the only path forward.” “I think this is one of the top three most important issues we should be discussing right now.” “We have to get rid of the federal student loan program, and we have to force a rightsizing of higher education, and a restructuring of higher education, such that the access to education becomes more ubiquitous.” “It's not this $300,000 debt load that everyone is forced to take on.”
0:48

David Friedberg: “ I believe 100% in ending the federal student loan program.” “I think that it will force a restructuring of the higher education system in the United States, which no one wants to hear, no one wants to do, and everyone is against.” “But I think it is the only path forward.” “I think this is one of the top three most important issues we should be discussing right now.” “We have to get rid of the federal student loan program, and we have to force a rightsizing of higher education, and a restructuring of higher education, such that the access to education becomes more ubiquitous.” “It's not this $300,000 debt load that everyone is forced to take on.”

The All-In Podcast

100,731 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🚨 HOLY CRAP. So if Senate Democrats shut down the government, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna and a group of Republicans will FORCE them to pass the SAVE Act in order to reopen "This is kind of a game of chess that Chuck Schumer is not so good at." "And so, we will, again, be pulling this procedural maneuver in an effort to force the vote in the Senate. And we're not going to budge!" "The votes as a whole for these appropriations will have to go back to the House, because they're going to reject it in the Senate — but that actually allows us to pull this procedure, which would allow us to essentially force the Senate at the same time to stick the SAVE Act in that if they want their appropriations to pass." BOOM!
1:08

🚨 HOLY CRAP. So if Senate Democrats shut down the government, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna and a group of Republicans will FORCE them to pass the SAVE Act in order to reopen "This is kind of a game of chess that Chuck Schumer is not so good at." "And so, we will, again, be pulling this procedural maneuver in an effort to force the vote in the Senate. And we're not going to budge!" "The votes as a whole for these appropriations will have to go back to the House, because they're going to reject it in the Senate — but that actually allows us to pull this procedure, which would allow us to essentially force the Senate at the same time to stick the SAVE Act in that if they want their appropriations to pass." BOOM!

Eric Daugherty

613,864 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Delhi: Indian Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi says, "We need missile force. Today, you will see that rockets and missiles have become intertwined because if we want to achieve an impact, both rockets and missiles can deliver it. We are looking towards a rocket missile force because, as you know, Pakistan has established a rocket force, and China has also created such a force. It is the need of the hour that we also establish such a force. We have tested the Pinaka system with a range of 120 km. We have also signed several other contracts that will explore ranges up to 150 km and later we will see it reaching a range of 300-450 km. You must have also heard about Pralay and BrahMos too..."
1:03

#WATCH | Delhi: Indian Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi says, "We need missile force. Today, you will see that rockets and missiles have become intertwined because if we want to achieve an impact, both rockets and missiles can deliver it. We are looking towards a rocket missile force because, as you know, Pakistan has established a rocket force, and China has also created such a force. It is the need of the hour that we also establish such a force. We have tested the Pinaka system with a range of 120 km. We have also signed several other contracts that will explore ranges up to 150 km and later we will see it reaching a range of 300-450 km. You must have also heard about Pralay and BrahMos too..."

ANI

105,693 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

"UFO levitation may be pulsed-periodic with counter-spin" The clear and reproducible "anti-gravity" effects seen here are just 20 to 40 grams (based on E.T. crop-picture designs), but I may not be doing everything correctly yet! These small upward effects come mainly from free-fall of an up-down moving magnet, rather than from its powerful upward force in a 3-phase field. More soon. We have the correct model for further development and testing. 🛸🐶
14:42

"UFO levitation may be pulsed-periodic with counter-spin" The clear and reproducible "anti-gravity" effects seen here are just 20 to 40 grams (based on E.T. crop-picture designs), but I may not be doing everything correctly yet! These small upward effects come mainly from free-fall of an up-down moving magnet, rather than from its powerful upward force in a 3-phase field. More soon. We have the correct model for further development and testing. 🛸🐶

Red Collie (Dr. Horace Drew) scientist/inventor

14,646 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

.President Donald J. Trump: "We're very disappointed that it's taking Boeing so long to build a new Air Force One. We have an Air Force One that is 40 years old... if we can get a 747 as a contribution to our Defense Department to use during a couple of years while they're building the other ones, I think that was a very nice gesture."
3:23

.President Donald J. Trump: "We're very disappointed that it's taking Boeing so long to build a new Air Force One. We have an Air Force One that is 40 years old... if we can get a 747 as a contribution to our Defense Department to use during a couple of years while they're building the other ones, I think that was a very nice gesture."

Rapid Response 47

912,915 просмотров • 1 год назад

Lenz Law "Eddy Current" Experiments 2 of 3 - Ring Magnets and a Spinning Copper Rod (YouTube deleted this experiment as well, labeling it as "medical misinformation.") Around 2010, I wrote a Facebook note titled "Frictionless Flywheel". (Facebook deleted my page of 15 years). In that write-up, I speculated and predicted that... ... if a magnet falls in slow motion down a copper tube... then what would happen if you did the inverse? Drop a magnet ring around a copper rod? It's the same relative motion between the magnet and the copper. So the magnet would tilt at an angle while slightly rotating as it falls in slow motion around the copper. But then I said... "Let's take it one step further... I predict that if you have magnet rings around a copper rod... and then you spin the rod... that the magnet rings would stabilize around the rod from eddy currents." I said, there will be a magnetic bearing effect where the magnet ring will levitate and spin. Because it's following in the wake of the eddy currents produced by the rotating copper. So the magnet should catch up to speed of the copper and match it like the moon to the Earth. Essentially remaining fixed relative to the copper rod... but since the copper is spinning at a high RPM, then the magnet should spin at a high RPM; albeit, with a slight lag. So, abiding by the scientific method, I make an observation of the magnet falling in slow motion. I thought critically about. I get a new idea. Once the new idea passes muster, I allow my self to make a prediction for a scenario that hasn't been tried yet. Worked it out in my mind to see if it was viable. But then I needed to test it. I didn't have the ability to spin a copper rod at a high enough RPM that I theorized would be needed. So I communicated with my friend Josh Toms We had been talking about different experiments for quite a while. Josh is a real experimenter and a good man. He tests things before he speaks on them and when he speaks, it's with an informed opinion. He sent me a copper sphere about 2 inches in diameter and taught me some cool stuff about eddy currents I hadn't seen when sending each other clips of experiments we were working on. I explained the concept of the "frictionless flywheel" and my prediction that the magnets would levitate and stabilize around the copper rod if it was fast enough. So Josh built a platform using an angle grinder as a motor to spin a copper rod. He put very strong NdFeB magnets around the 1 inch diameter copper rod. IT WORKED! Josh brought this platform to the Tesla Technology Conference in Albuquerque, NM in 2010 where we met up. I filmed the demonstration of the platform you see in this video. There was a young boy who was fascinated by some of the magnet demonstrations I and others were giving at the conference. So I was explaining the process of what was happening to the inquisitive kid. Again.. what you notice here is that the eddy currents act as a force field to prevent friction between the magnets and copper. There is a stable gap and "magnetic cushion" that forms after a certain RPM. (Dependent upon the mass/gauss of the magnet in relation to the diamagnetic quality/mass of the copper or material in motion.) And what is super interesting to me is that once again... you can violently shake the entire platform and it WILL NOT disturb the magnets. The will not touch that copper after a certain RPM. You could make violent 90˚ turns and from the perspective of the magnets... it's just moving in slow motion relative to the copper. Just like how the magnet falls in slow motion relative to the copper down the tube. But this is just at a higher velocity relative to a stationary observer viewing the rotating system. But it doesn't matter if it's a centripetally rotating system at a constant velocity or linear acceleration in a particular direction... those eddy currents act as a force field to protect whatever is relative to the magnets and/or copper in those moments. So the claim and prediction that a frictionless flywheel effect and magnetic bearing would take place between a ring magnet and spinning copper rod DEMONSTRATED to be true. Now "PROVING" this scenario means to derive mathematical equations to justify an explanation of how the end results arise. Spinning magnets on a copper rod doesn't prove anything. In science... proof is math. Experiments can never prove anything. Experiments never provide equations or numbers or variables. Experiments provide evidence. You collect the evidence FIRST... AFTER doing real-world, hands-on experimentation. Anything else is just armchair research and talk. You write the proofs on paper to describe how you think things happen. And your proofs must abide by the constraints of the model you use. Sure... you can use a mathematical artifice like Lorentz invariance (relativity) to prove the end results arise because of: dark matter accumulating between the magnet and copper. Or that it must be space-time curvature bending... Or that it must be because of the aether rippling and vortexing... Or because of the dynamic casimir effect or zero point energy. Or anti-gravity. NOPE! None of those things are needed in the explanations I offer for any experiments and real-world data collected. I use the framework of what I call GALILEAN VARIANCE. Good ol' classical physics in 3D Euclidean space. No 4th dimension. No space-time. No aether. No nonsense. Only Newtonian Mechanics and elementary math.... but with a twist! ... and under.. "a new light". I have a completely different interpretation as to what gravity is and the mechanism of how it arises. Issac Newton never claimed to have a theory for the CAUSE of gravity. Newton's brilliant work and optics describes the behavior of matter and energy within a gravitational field. But he never claimed to know what causes gravity. "I have not as yet been able to discover the reason for these properties of gravity from phenomena, and I do not form any hypotheses." - Newton However... I do claim to have an explanation for the cause and mechanism of gravity. And it means a total abandonment of relativity and half of QED. Gravity IS a force! (and an emission) Eddy currents are not gravity. Magnetism is not gravity. And the kicker... gravity is not electric either. It's an illusion. Gravity is not an illusion. But the illusion is that people think gravity is electric. It's not. I have a completely different take. And boy has it gotten me in a lot of trouble and banned from speaking time and time again. But... if the information is valid... then trying to suppress it is like trying to hold an inflated basketball under water. Your arms are gonna get tired eventually and things are gonna come up to the surface with spring-loaded force. Equal to the amount people tried holding it back. The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity
2:36

Lenz Law "Eddy Current" Experiments 2 of 3 - Ring Magnets and a Spinning Copper Rod (YouTube deleted this experiment as well, labeling it as "medical misinformation.") Around 2010, I wrote a Facebook note titled "Frictionless Flywheel". (Facebook deleted my page of 15 years). In that write-up, I speculated and predicted that... ... if a magnet falls in slow motion down a copper tube... then what would happen if you did the inverse? Drop a magnet ring around a copper rod? It's the same relative motion between the magnet and the copper. So the magnet would tilt at an angle while slightly rotating as it falls in slow motion around the copper. But then I said... "Let's take it one step further... I predict that if you have magnet rings around a copper rod... and then you spin the rod... that the magnet rings would stabilize around the rod from eddy currents." I said, there will be a magnetic bearing effect where the magnet ring will levitate and spin. Because it's following in the wake of the eddy currents produced by the rotating copper. So the magnet should catch up to speed of the copper and match it like the moon to the Earth. Essentially remaining fixed relative to the copper rod... but since the copper is spinning at a high RPM, then the magnet should spin at a high RPM; albeit, with a slight lag. So, abiding by the scientific method, I make an observation of the magnet falling in slow motion. I thought critically about. I get a new idea. Once the new idea passes muster, I allow my self to make a prediction for a scenario that hasn't been tried yet. Worked it out in my mind to see if it was viable. But then I needed to test it. I didn't have the ability to spin a copper rod at a high enough RPM that I theorized would be needed. So I communicated with my friend Josh Toms We had been talking about different experiments for quite a while. Josh is a real experimenter and a good man. He tests things before he speaks on them and when he speaks, it's with an informed opinion. He sent me a copper sphere about 2 inches in diameter and taught me some cool stuff about eddy currents I hadn't seen when sending each other clips of experiments we were working on. I explained the concept of the "frictionless flywheel" and my prediction that the magnets would levitate and stabilize around the copper rod if it was fast enough. So Josh built a platform using an angle grinder as a motor to spin a copper rod. He put very strong NdFeB magnets around the 1 inch diameter copper rod. IT WORKED! Josh brought this platform to the Tesla Technology Conference in Albuquerque, NM in 2010 where we met up. I filmed the demonstration of the platform you see in this video. There was a young boy who was fascinated by some of the magnet demonstrations I and others were giving at the conference. So I was explaining the process of what was happening to the inquisitive kid. Again.. what you notice here is that the eddy currents act as a force field to prevent friction between the magnets and copper. There is a stable gap and "magnetic cushion" that forms after a certain RPM. (Dependent upon the mass/gauss of the magnet in relation to the diamagnetic quality/mass of the copper or material in motion.) And what is super interesting to me is that once again... you can violently shake the entire platform and it WILL NOT disturb the magnets. The will not touch that copper after a certain RPM. You could make violent 90˚ turns and from the perspective of the magnets... it's just moving in slow motion relative to the copper. Just like how the magnet falls in slow motion relative to the copper down the tube. But this is just at a higher velocity relative to a stationary observer viewing the rotating system. But it doesn't matter if it's a centripetally rotating system at a constant velocity or linear acceleration in a particular direction... those eddy currents act as a force field to protect whatever is relative to the magnets and/or copper in those moments. So the claim and prediction that a frictionless flywheel effect and magnetic bearing would take place between a ring magnet and spinning copper rod DEMONSTRATED to be true. Now "PROVING" this scenario means to derive mathematical equations to justify an explanation of how the end results arise. Spinning magnets on a copper rod doesn't prove anything. In science... proof is math. Experiments can never prove anything. Experiments never provide equations or numbers or variables. Experiments provide evidence. You collect the evidence FIRST... AFTER doing real-world, hands-on experimentation. Anything else is just armchair research and talk. You write the proofs on paper to describe how you think things happen. And your proofs must abide by the constraints of the model you use. Sure... you can use a mathematical artifice like Lorentz invariance (relativity) to prove the end results arise because of: dark matter accumulating between the magnet and copper. Or that it must be space-time curvature bending... Or that it must be because of the aether rippling and vortexing... Or because of the dynamic casimir effect or zero point energy. Or anti-gravity. NOPE! None of those things are needed in the explanations I offer for any experiments and real-world data collected. I use the framework of what I call GALILEAN VARIANCE. Good ol' classical physics in 3D Euclidean space. No 4th dimension. No space-time. No aether. No nonsense. Only Newtonian Mechanics and elementary math.... but with a twist! ... and under.. "a new light". I have a completely different interpretation as to what gravity is and the mechanism of how it arises. Issac Newton never claimed to have a theory for the CAUSE of gravity. Newton's brilliant work and optics describes the behavior of matter and energy within a gravitational field. But he never claimed to know what causes gravity. "I have not as yet been able to discover the reason for these properties of gravity from phenomena, and I do not form any hypotheses." - Newton However... I do claim to have an explanation for the cause and mechanism of gravity. And it means a total abandonment of relativity and half of QED. Gravity IS a force! (and an emission) Eddy currents are not gravity. Magnetism is not gravity. And the kicker... gravity is not electric either. It's an illusion. Gravity is not an illusion. But the illusion is that people think gravity is electric. It's not. I have a completely different take. And boy has it gotten me in a lot of trouble and banned from speaking time and time again. But... if the information is valid... then trying to suppress it is like trying to hold an inflated basketball under water. Your arms are gonna get tired eventually and things are gonna come up to the surface with spring-loaded force. Equal to the amount people tried holding it back. The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

45,879 просмотров • 1 год назад

The "extended" shape of that two-armed, clockwise spin-wave means that the outer gaseous coma of 3I/ATLAS may be spinning along electromagnetic field lines, possibly by a Lorentz force. Rather than by "friction" of the gaseous material with a fast-spinning hard center. In other words, if its central core is magnetic, and electric current flows in-to-out of vice-versa, then any gaseous ions may flow as shown in two other small-scale, laboratory models below (for blue argon gas or mercury). Many thanks once again to Ray's Astrophotography for doing the necessary observational measurements, to teach us about 3I/ATLAS, while most "professional" astronomers and NASA have not done diddly-squat.
0:31

The "extended" shape of that two-armed, clockwise spin-wave means that the outer gaseous coma of 3I/ATLAS may be spinning along electromagnetic field lines, possibly by a Lorentz force. Rather than by "friction" of the gaseous material with a fast-spinning hard center. In other words, if its central core is magnetic, and electric current flows in-to-out of vice-versa, then any gaseous ions may flow as shown in two other small-scale, laboratory models below (for blue argon gas or mercury). Many thanks once again to Ray's Astrophotography for doing the necessary observational measurements, to teach us about 3I/ATLAS, while most "professional" astronomers and NASA have not done diddly-squat.

Red Collie (Dr. Horace Drew) scientist/inventor

23,918 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

While we study the physics of "spin" and "counter-spin" as used for UFO levitation, we may wish to review current knowledge of "spin" and "counter-spin" in more well-known systems, say those used in hoverboards! In this (old) video, you can see how the fast spin of a lower flywheel with 6 N-S-N-S-N-S magnets (similar to what we have found for the lower flywheel of our UFO model) produces Lenz-inductive spin and/or rise of an aluminum disc placed above. If we use a drive-motor to "spin" that aluminum disc in one direction, while we "counter-spin" those N-S-N-S-N-S magnets in the other direction, then we get greatly enhanced repulsions due to fast RELATIVE motions! Such physics may be relevant to UFO flight, so we can study it and contemplate possibilities.🛸
4:31

While we study the physics of "spin" and "counter-spin" as used for UFO levitation, we may wish to review current knowledge of "spin" and "counter-spin" in more well-known systems, say those used in hoverboards! In this (old) video, you can see how the fast spin of a lower flywheel with 6 N-S-N-S-N-S magnets (similar to what we have found for the lower flywheel of our UFO model) produces Lenz-inductive spin and/or rise of an aluminum disc placed above. If we use a drive-motor to "spin" that aluminum disc in one direction, while we "counter-spin" those N-S-N-S-N-S magnets in the other direction, then we get greatly enhanced repulsions due to fast RELATIVE motions! Such physics may be relevant to UFO flight, so we can study it and contemplate possibilities.🛸

Red Collie (Dr. Horace Drew) scientist/inventor

52,320 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

We all have a choice to be hopeful. Voting is a choice. Being a decent human being is a choice. We all have a choice to bring about the country we want. We all have the power. America has been a force for good. Yes, we have made mistakes, but we can and should learn from our history. We can walk forward into the future, embracing a better future, one that is for all of us, not just some of us. We can be a force for good, a force of hope. Thank you, Michelle Obama and Barack Obama for these beautiful words today, and congratulations on the opening of the magnificent Obama Library.
1:19

We all have a choice to be hopeful. Voting is a choice. Being a decent human being is a choice. We all have a choice to bring about the country we want. We all have the power. America has been a force for good. Yes, we have made mistakes, but we can and should learn from our history. We can walk forward into the future, embracing a better future, one that is for all of us, not just some of us. We can be a force for good, a force of hope. Thank you, Michelle Obama and Barack Obama for these beautiful words today, and congratulations on the opening of the magnificent Obama Library.

Maria Shriver

52,609 просмотров • 25 дней назад