正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

The "extended" shape of that two-armed, clockwise spin-wave means that the outer gaseous coma of 3I/ATLAS may be spinning along electromagnetic field lines, possibly by a Lorentz force. Rather than by "friction" of the gaseous material with a fast-spinning hard center. In other words, if its central core is...

23,918 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The basic idea behind "UFO physics" is very simple. We can get a strong "upward" force from a fast-spinning magnet (or magnetic flywheel), because it "pushes against space" like a spinning gyroscope. Very easy, if we apply a rotating magnetic field (3 or 5-phase) to that magnet! The problem is that such an "upward" force is accompanied by an equal and opposite "downward" force by Newton's 3rd Law. So we see an increase of gravitational potential, but no loss of total weight ("up" plus "down"), unless that spinning magnet goes into "free fall". How to solve this great problem? The E.T. crop artists have suggested (many times) that we should try to change that "downward" force into another kind of force, which does NOT follow Newton's 3rd Law: namely the Lorentz force of electromagnetism. As shown in a video below, added DC current makes a disc magnet spin rapidly in one direction (by the Lorentz force), while other thin wires which supply that DC current spin in an opposite direction. We can see right away, that the mass of that disc magnet is perhaps 100 times more than the mass of many thin wires which surround it below. Yet they spin in opposite directions at approximately the same speeds! This shows that spin angular momentum (m x v x r) is NOT conserved, due to a peculiar sideways action of the Lorentz force. Does everyone understand so far? In summary, if we can change the "downward" force, for an upward spinning-magnet, into a Lorentz force, then we should have NO real "downward" force, but only a force that goes "up"! So that will be my next experiment. I have had to order some specialized parts to make the trial apparatus correctly, but will try to do it in October, after all needed parts arrive. "The simple is great" (Lao Tzu) 🛸

Red Collie (Dr. Horace Drew) scientist/inventor

29,769 次观看 • 8 个月前

❓ IS 3I/ATLAS RAPIDLY SPINNING ❓ The short answer? Of course not. I've been trying to avoid addressing this YouTuber directly because I know the cult will come for my comments, but I'm tired of getting messages about it and seeing people base entire arguments about 3I/ATLAS on this single false premise. Simply put, Ray does not understand what he's looking at in this video (and many others). The changing appearance is due to simple atmospheric distortion. I'll explain below: All light that we observe from the ground here on Earth is subject to atmospheric distortion regardless of the source. Think of how the air looks "wavy" over pavement on a hot day. Same concept. Different sources of light result in different effects (e.g., stars emitting light twinkle, while planetary bodies reflecting light do not), but it is all distorted in one way or another. Now, we know Ray is using a 14" telescope. Depending upon his eyepiece, that means the FOV in his images is likely somewhere between 40 and 90 arcminutes. The current estimated size of the coma of 3I/ATLAS is 2.2 arcminutes. In all likelihood, the visible part of the coma in Ray's images is even smaller than this, but in all of the math I am going to give him the benefit of erring on the side of caution. Why does any of that matter? This means it occupies a tiny fraction of the total FOV of the telescope. Even if we give him the smallest FOV and the largest coma size, it's still a mere 5% of the total image. Now, telescopes do not have a magical optical zoom feature. Any zoom is done digitally with all degradations of quality involved in doing so. This extreme zoom also means that small atmospheric distortions are heavily amplified. So, when Ray captures an image every 60 seconds (or really any interval since he isn't stacking), he is capturing the atmospheric conditions in a slightly different position. Again, think about the "wavy" air above pavement on a hot day and how it is constantly moving. It's the same concept. The Earth's atmosphere is in constant motion. This is what causes the image to look different in every single frame. In fact, you will never find two of Ray's frames that look identical ever. In any video. So let's assume for a minute that you don't believe in atmospheric distortion for whatever conspiratorial reason. Let's examine what he is claiming on its face. In order for you to believe Ray is correct, and his video is actually showing movement of the anti-tail and coma and not simple distortion, this means you have to believe that TENS OF THOUSANDS of kilometers of dust, gas, and other ejecta are simply disappearing and reappearing every few seconds. The anti-tail is an estimated ONE MILLION kilometers long. You would have to believe that a 1 million km long structure is shifted nearly instantaneously without leaving so much as a trail. And this isn't even accounting for the tens of thousands of kilometers of dust and gas randomly disappearing and reappearing from all sides of the coma at random. I don't think Ray is a bad guy and I think he means well. I think he has a super cool rig and was learning how to decipher the images he was capturing when he was suddenly thrust into the spotlight and did the best he could. But enough is enough at this point. 3I/ATLAS is NOT rotating every 60 seconds or whatever other nonsense is being proposed based on Ray's observations. The "scientists" and "PhDs" out there who don't understand simple physics about Earth's atmosphere and the movement of planetary bodies need to quietly see themselves out of the conversation or do some reading and come back more informed. Stay curious. #3IATLAS #3I #3Iatlascomet #astrophotography

Drew Doss

32,146 次观看 • 6 个月前