Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

"The biggest surprise is that eating eggs only for a week or even five days, everybody who sticks to it religiously lose more weight than by any other method, including fasting..." Fascinating Ovadia Heart Health Livestream yesterday with Claus Carlsen. The full recording is available on the iFixHearts YouTube channel.

57,647 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля Jason N
Jason N1 год назад

@ClausCarlsen1 It worked for me.

Фото профиля Chris S. Cornell
Chris S. Cornell1 год назад

@ClausCarlsen1 I’d love to hear how it went.

Фото профиля BerbRx
BerbRx1 год назад

Finally, a berberine supplement held to a pharmacist’s standard. ✔ Supports healthy blood sugar & metabolism ✔ Enhances digestion & gut health ✔ Promotes cardiovascular wellness ✔ Optimized for absorption & effectiveness No shortcuts. Just quality you can trust.

Фото профиля Vegetable oil kills people slowly
Vegetable oil kills people slowly1 год назад

@ClausCarlsen1 Thanks for the link. It's great to hear from Claus.

Фото профиля Chris S. Cornell
Chris S. Cornell1 год назад

@ClausCarlsen1

Фото профиля cst
cst1 год назад

@ClausCarlsen1 Tried it but spent weeks getting over an allergic reaction to the 15 eggs I ate over 2 days. I was starting to like eggs. I can eat a couple but then eyes swell. Very sad about it. I’m 65 yrs. Got lucky all those yrs I guess before body reacted. I’d post a pic. phone won’t let me

Фото профиля Shaun Waso
Shaun Waso1 год назад

@ClausCarlsen1 Eggs are a powerhouse of nutrition and can be quite effective in a short-term dietary strategy. It's interesting to see how different approaches work for different people. Exploring these strategies can offer new insights into metabolic health!

Фото профиля Maggie Barrett
Maggie Barrett1 год назад

@ClausCarlsen1 Thx! I may try this (along with bone broth). I never lost a pound (but gained) on strict carnivore a year or so back (and I really gave it my all for 9-12 months or so). Maybe it’s time to try a little something different.

Фото профиля TJ Schmidt
TJ Schmidt1 год назад

@ClausCarlsen1 My chickens better up their damn game then (to be fair to the chickens, we only have 6, not sure they could keep me going without a trip to the store )

Фото профиля Gwensday
Gwensday1 год назад

@ClausCarlsen1 Reminds me of the 1970's Eggs & Grapefruit diet or the more fun one Eggs & Wine

Фото профиля Alanna Noel 🧩🎗️🇺🇸
Alanna Noel 🧩🎗️🇺🇸1 год назад

@ClausCarlsen1 Too bad I cannot eat eggs!!!

Похожие видео

Fasting is NOT Superior for Autophagy Autophagy has become the biggest buzzword in nutrition in the last 5 years & whenever I do videos or posts on intermittent fasting & why it is a useful tool for fat loss, but NOT superior to other calorie equated diets, people invariably say that ‘tHeSe StUdIeS dOn’T aCcOuNt FoR aUtoPhAgY!’ When I cite studies showing that normal calorie restriction gets the same benefits as calorie equated fasting diets, people often say that fasting gets you the benefits WITHOUT calorie restriction. Well, a very highly controlled study showed that this is NOT the case Well this study did (PMID: 34135111). They had people follow one of 3 diets: 1) Alternate day fasting without calorie restriction where they ate 200% of their maintenance calories on feeding days, & 0% the next day (200:0) & continued to alternate them throughout the course of the study 2) Alternate day fasting with 25% calorie restriction where they ate 150% of their maintenance calories on feeding days & 0% the next day (150:0) & continued to alternate those throughout the course of the study or 3) Continuous calorie restriction where they had people eat 75% of their maintenance calories every day for the duration of the study (75:75) Both the 150:0 & 75:75 diets reduced body weight to the same extent, but the 75:75 group lost slightly more fat mass & retained slightly more lean mass than the 150:0 fasting group. Both restricted groups lost more body fat & weight than the 200:0 group which did not lose weight or fat. Markers of autophagy were also equivalent between the 150:0 & 75:75 groups as well as other adipose tissue genes, gut hormones, and markers of cardiometabolic health This study demonstrates that it is the caloric restriction that drives these improvements in health & the changes in autophagy, NOT because fasting has some magical effect on autophagy that exists outside of the caloric restriction it imposes I am NOT saying fasting is bad. I’m not saying it’s not a useful tool or that you can’t lose fat with it. You can & it can be a great tool for many people… it’s just not magic like many proponents of fasting try to make it out to be Tired of the diet wars & not knowing how to make sense of all the contradictory information out there? Comment ‘FRAMEWORK’ and I’ll send you my simplified guide on how to lose fat & build muscle for FREE

Layne Norton, PhD

29,887 просмотров • 1 год назад

The Dangerous Cult of 'Fasting' Influencers. Fasting has its anecdotal benefits, yes. But it is overrated. And water fasting is highly overrated. But this video featuring a Cardiologist is amusingly nonsense. There is no study from Boston (from a "University?" - how vague!) that says 7-days water fasting reduces risk of cancer (what cancer?) by 70%. And there is no proof that fasting kills cancer cells in humans. Here is what fasting does to cancers in humans. Nothing. Fasting is now become a sort of religion-like cult for wellness influencers to rake in views and engagement. From a scientific standpoint, there are no realistically good human studies to prove anything from fasting that benefits cancers. I know, I know, "autophagy" and all that. Autophagy: Autophagy is the natural, conserved degradation of the cell that removes unnecessary or dysfunctional components. Yes, its a legit term and all. But in the context of cancer reduction and fasting in humans, it sounds like "immunity boosting," another wellness fraud term. The effects of fasting on cancer cells are all based on MOUSE studies, and none explicitly translated to humans. See this paper: everything is based on cells and tissues and small animal experiments: "While research on the subject is tantalizing, there’s little clinical evidence involving humans to substantiate the claims. Studies on the potential impacts on cancer treatment from various forms of fasting or calorie restriction, including the possibility that they reduce side effects, have been limited." "Fasting may not be appropriate for malnourished individuals or those with cancer cachexia, which results in a continuing loss of skeletal muscle mass, or for people with chronic diseases. Those with diabetes need to be very careful, because of the risk of hypoglycemia." "Based on our systematic review and meta-analysis, there is currently no evidence supporting the superiority of therapeutic fasting over non-fasting in preventing chemotherapy toxicity." - see here: Even intermittent fasting (IF) is overrated in cancer. "IF may be considered in adults seeking cancer-prevention benefits through means of weight management, butwhether IF itself affects cancer-related metabolic and molecular pathways remains unanswered. See here: Also this: "Fasting for short periods does not have any beneficial effect on the quality of life of cancer patients during treatment. Evidence on fasting regimes reducing side effects and toxicities of chemotherapy is missing." See here: The whole aspect of "fasting reducing cancer incidence" in the real world is just due to weight loss. Obesity is associated with at least 13 types of cancers and reversing obesity reduces risk of cancer - nothing to do with fasting killing off cancers cells in the body. And one can lose weight even without fasting. See here: Everything from prevention of adverse events of cancer, to reduction in side effects from chemotherapy, to slowing cancer growth by reducing glucose levels, to promoting cell regeneration by affecting autophagy is all LAB BASED MOLECULAR LEVEL HYPOTHESIS that has not been proven conclusively in humans. See here: Cancer patients must not starve. They must remain hydrated and they must eat a well balanced diet because cancer condition is highly demanding. And dont water fast for 7 days. Easy for people to make reels on it, but in real life, it may prove disastrous. Water fast does make you lose weight (because of starvation) but it is not at all a healthy way to lose weight. Stop with this fasting and cancer madness already.

TheLiverDoc™

269,476 просмотров • 2 лет назад