Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

The craziest thing about The iPhone 17 Pro variable aperture camera is that Apple isn't the first to do this but Samsung, which released a dual aperture smartphone back when Galaxy S9 launched. Although dual aperture is not as advanced as variable aperture, the premise is the same. A...

65,480 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

23 Kommentare

Profilbild von Daxter ✨
Daxter ✨vor 3 Tagen

There is big philosophy difference. Samsung pushes unbaked features to look good on spec sheet while Apple do when they feel confident that they Cooked!!

Profilbild von ᴠᴀɴᴢᴡᴀʟɪ
ᴠᴀɴᴢᴡᴀʟɪvor 2 Tagen

shamesung will most certainly bring the feature back now Apple has.

Profilbild von Whimsy Wigglesnootpants 
Whimsy Wigglesnootpants vor 3 Tagen

I've observed this cycle between Android and Apple countless times before. Android launched Android Beam, later discontinued it, and then Apple introduced a similar feature. Now, Android is also reintroducing that technology. The same pattern holds true in this situation as well.

Profilbild von Whozae ✨️
Whozae ✨️vor 2 Tagen

The Samsung S10 Series was the last Galaxy Phone to have "Dual Aperture". No Samsung phone after brought that feature back let alone the latest $1299+ Samsung Ultra Models

Profilbild von warmoaran3 II
warmoaran3 IIvor 2 Tagen

a variable aperture on a phone isn't very useful imo. You either reduce the amount of light the sensor can gather, which on a sensor that already struggles to gather light. Or you introduce diffraction, which makes the already soft lens even softer when stopping down too much.

Profilbild von eze
ezevor 2 Tagen

And it worked like absolute dog shit on the Samsung. Come on now

Profilbild von T⭕🅱️Y
T⭕🅱️Yvor 3 Tagen

Just like they got rid of Bluetooth connection to the s pen on s25 On the s24, you could control the camera with s pen On s25, the pen only works for drawing and tapping screen

Profilbild von Aquis_GN 📱🤖 smartphone/android vtuber
Aquis_GN 📱🤖 smartphone/android vtubervor 2 Tagen

Nokia already had variable aperture in the N86 back in 2009

Profilbild von osito chino
osito chinovor 3 Tagen

Samsung abandono la apertura variable desde el s10, además de que cada año quita una función a sus teléfonos

Profilbild von AdiT
AdiTvor 2 Tagen

There is an Apple wolf in Samsung Department!

Profilbild von Riggon
Riggonvor 2 Tagen

Indeed, this Samsung feature was impressive enough to vanish after a single generation 🤣

Profilbild von Lima Technology
Lima Technologyvor 2 Tagen

Donde estan todos los boludos Apple sheep a decir que están copiando?

Profilbild von Aegon Targaryen
Aegon Targaryenvor 3 Tagen

Samsung S27 Will Destroy IPHONE!

Profilbild von The Corsair
The Corsairvor 2 Tagen

Samsung was shit, apple is good

Profilbild von Hobie
Hobievor 2 Tagen

The Samsung X account literally had a chance to make a reasonable argument

Profilbild von Davitt 🦅
Davitt 🦅vor 2 Tagen

Android innovation : 🙂🙂🙂 Apple innovation : 😍😍😍

Profilbild von MAKAVELY-1469
MAKAVELY-1469vor 2 Tagen

Apple is dying from within

Profilbild von Yasin ERHAN
Yasin ERHANvor 2 Tagen

2026 samsung?

Profilbild von Zakhele Mtolo
Zakhele Mtolovor 2 Tagen

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Profilbild von Warriera↗️
Warriera↗️vor 2 Tagen

Samsung pazarlama yapamaz ve statü satamaz. Samsung, yenilik getirir ama kâr bahanesi ile ya kaldırır ya da güncellemez. Apple pazarlar, statü satar. Yenilik yapmasa da satar, geç kaldığı teknolojiyi de yeniymiş gibi satar. Apple - Statü Samsung - kobay fare

Profilbild von Utkarsh Verma
Utkarsh Vermavor 3 Tagen

idiot , you can do this in expert raw mode in s models

Profilbild von Arjun
Arjunvor 3 Tagen

Check dm please

Profilbild von carlos 🇵🇷
carlos 🇵🇷vor 2 Tagen

It's because apple didn't have it and millions of people bought it so Samsung saw that nobody cared. Now that apple finally caught up, Samsung will do it or it will be just another thing that apple fanboys will dock Samsung for.

Ähnliche Videos

Full Breakdown on this: "Key Cycle 1162-2" -Tech Stream data gathered from KRs Lexus shows a triggering event where the Lexus travels in reverse 62 Ft at 24.2 MPH. They claim this triggering event is when KR hits JOK. -Using tech stream data, along with data from the Lexus black box, Aperture (crash reconstruction experts) wrote a report. In the report they claim that based on information from the Lexus black box (the time Karen started her ignition) that the triggering event 1162-2 happened from 12:31:38-12:31:43. -This means that Aperture believes Karen Read struck JOK with her SUV sometime between 12:31:38-12:31:43. -On April 28th, Ian Whiffin testified for the CW. During his testimony he stated that JOKs phone data shows that from 12:31:56-12:32:16, JOK was interacting with his phone. He states that after 12:32:16, there is no more interactions between JOK & the phone. -When you compare the two reports, you see that 13 seconds AFTER Aperture claims JOK was struck (12:31:43), Whiffin claims JOK began interacting with his phone (12:31:56). -The medical examiner testified today that the blow to the back of JOKs head would have left him incapacitated. This means it would be IMPOSSIBLE for JOK to have been on his phone at 12:31:56 (Whiffin's report), based on the time of collision (12:31:43) from the crash reconstruction report (Aperture) -To remedy this massive problem for CW, Aperture decided to amend their report, in the middle of the trial. (May 8th) -They claim that the "clocks on JOKs iPhone and the Lexus are off" They state that JOKs iPhone "runs late" -AMAZINGLY, to remedy the issue between Whiffins testimony and their report, they decided "based on fixing the clock differences" that the NEW time that triggering event happened (the collision) was at 12:32:16. -THE EXACT TIME Whiffin stated JOKs iPhone stops recording apple health data and the last time the phone is interacted with. That is complete bullshit. -In the first trial, the time of collision based on THE EXACT SAME DATA, was said to be 12:45. Shockingly, after learning that Karen Read connected to JOKs wifi at 12:36 AM during the trial, the CW changed their time of the collision yet again, that time to 12:30. -Alessi already cross examined Ian Whiffin about this exact issue with the conflicting times between his report and Apertures. during this trial. On no planet should Bev allow this report to be amended and testified to. This is the bed they made and they have to lay in it. If she allows a change, the defense should immediately move for a mistrial. -When you're trying to make up a story, this is what happens. You make it up as you go and are constantly chasing your tail. This is corruption playing out for the world to see.

Joe TurtleHead

187,419 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

First, the conclusion: the so called Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leak from last night turned out to be a false alarm. After watching the original video over and over again, I'm convinced it isn't a Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra. It's actually the blue version of the Galaxy Z Fold7. Because of the lighting and color temperature, the blue frame appeared black on camera, which led to the confusion. Here are the three biggest clues: 1. The inner display camera cutout is too large. Compared with the official Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra renders, the inner camera hole on the Fold8 Ultra is noticeably smaller. The one in the leaked video is still the larger Fold7-style cutout. 2. The rear camera housing doesn't match. The cylindrical camera housing reflects light with a bright metallic sheen, which is much more consistent with the blue Galaxy Z Fold7 than the black Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra. Some of the hardware details also don't line up. 3. The inner display is still highly reflective. The device in the video shows obvious screen reflections. However, the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is the first Fold to feature an anti reflective inner display film. Anyone familiar with Samsung foldables should immediately notice that the reflections don't look like this. Based on these three points, I'm confident the device in the video is a blue Galaxy Z Fold7, not the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra. The confusion is understandable because the two generations are incredibly similar. They share the same overall dimensions and aspect ratio, making them very easy to mix up. The good news is that the real Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra will be even better. It will have an even less visible crease than the Fold7, along with the new anti reflective inner display film.

Ice Universe

127,679 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

APERTURE A reading of the music video The Aperture video doesn’t tell a linear story. It works as an emotional loop. It begins and ends in the same place, but that doesn’t mean nothing has changed. It suggests something more honest: inner processes rarely resolve in a single pass. From the start, Harry Styles doesn’t run. He walks through corridors, contained, while another presence follows him. Not a villain, not an external threat, but something that persists. Something already there. When the fall down the stairs happens, the previous balance breaks. Not as punishment, but as consequence. Light enters, and order shifts. What follows isn’t chaos. It’s choreography. Even the confrontation is danced. There are no uncontrolled impulses, only learned movements. Resistance itself can be a role. After the clash, there is no immediate resolution. They separate. And in that space, the central gesture appears: Harry chooses. He turns back. He faces it. From that decision, the dance begins. At first it’s aerial, suspended, weightless. There is no fusion and no victory, only exploration. The body rehearses coexistence before fixing it. They move together through corridors. Spaces of transition, routine, everyday life. The energy that once collided now cooperates. Truth stops being a crisis and starts walking with him. When they return to the stairs, the place of rupture, there is no fight. No escape. They pass each other like strangers. That isn’t coldness. It’s integration without dramatization. Harry goes back alone to his room. The video ends where it began. But the loop doesn’t suggest confinement. It suggests process. The conflict doesn’t disappear. It reorganizes. Light doesn’t solve everything, but it changes the relationship with what is seen. Aperture doesn’t promise closure. It proposes something more truthful: returning to the starting point with a little more awareness. And sometimes, that’s exactly what opening up means. 🪟✨ Opening up doesn’t always change the destination. Sometimes, it changes the way you return. #Aperture #HarryStyles #NewEra #EmotionalLoop #LetTheLightIn #ProcessOverClosure #Vulnerability #ChoreographyOfTruth #Growth joy larkin ✨ P.S. Grateful to Loreley Moni19🍋໑̣ and Pankipelus 🍋💋🪩❯❯❯❯🏁🐝🩵💚×͜×🥝🚁🏡 . We watched the video over and over again, and each time we found something new. Their thoughtful, generous perspectives helped shape this reading, simply shared for the love of it.

GRVFCaleidoscope 🪬×͜× (ツ)#VintageFan 🌻🍋

31,904 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten