Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

The design on that chip or sensor in the ball has to be sharp that was why it caught the near contact from the Croatian player!

big___Tea's profile picture

TEE☕️

1,156 subscribers

87,192 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieSport
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Croatia was kicked out of the match because Matanic touched the ball with his hair AND the referee had to decide if Viega’s contact with the ball is considered “deliberate play”. If yes, the goal was correct, but the referee decided “no”. But what are the rules saying? In FIFA and IFAB Laws of the Game, deliberate play is when a player has control of the ball and attempts to pass, gain possession, or clear it. *‘Deliberate play’ (excluding deliberate handball) is when a player has control of the ball with the possibility of: •passing the ball to a team-mate; •gaining possession of the ball; or •clearing the ball (e.g. by kicking or heading it) ➡️clearing the ball (e.g. by kicking or heading it) And that’s what Viega did. He cleared the ball. But a Croatian player managed to intercept the ball before it went out of play; that led to the goal. Croatia was robbed. Source in comments.
2:07

Croatia was kicked out of the match because Matanic touched the ball with his hair AND the referee had to decide if Viega’s contact with the ball is considered “deliberate play”. If yes, the goal was correct, but the referee decided “no”. But what are the rules saying? In FIFA and IFAB Laws of the Game, deliberate play is when a player has control of the ball and attempts to pass, gain possession, or clear it. *‘Deliberate play’ (excluding deliberate handball) is when a player has control of the ball with the possibility of: •passing the ball to a team-mate; •gaining possession of the ball; or •clearing the ball (e.g. by kicking or heading it) ➡️clearing the ball (e.g. by kicking or heading it) And that’s what Viega did. He cleared the ball. But a Croatian player managed to intercept the ball before it went out of play; that led to the goal. Croatia was robbed. Source in comments.

Goran Majić

35,114 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This may be the fastest a player has gone from contact to bat on the ground that I’ve ever seen
0:43

This may be the fastest a player has gone from contact to bat on the ground that I’ve ever seen

Stephen Schoch

332,150 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 Regarding Croatia's disallowed goal, this "super slow-motion" replay shows that the ball was indeed almost certainly touched by Matanović—at the very least, a graze of the hair. We can obviously question the "spirit" of how the rules are applied here, but since technology allows us to detect even the slightest micro-touch of the ball, we might as well use it. 🤯 HOWEVER, the main aspect of this decision to analyze is the subsequent header deflection by Veiga. Indeed, two questions arise here (in relation to the Laws of the Game): - Was it a "deliberate play" on his part or not ? If it is deliberate, he plays the Croatian player behind him onside. If it is not, offside should be called. - Was it a save ? (i.e., "preventing or attempting to prevent the ball from going into or very close to the goal"). If it is a save, then offside must be called. According to the Laws of the Game: "The following criteria should be used, as appropriate, as indicators that a player had control of the ball and, as a result, can be considered to have 'deliberately played' the ball: - The ball had travelled from distance and the player had a clear view of it; - The ball was not moving quickly; - The direction of the ball was not unexpected; - The player had time to coordinate their body movement, i.e. it was not a case of instinctive stretching or jumping, or a movement that achieved limited contact/control; - A ball on the ground is much easier to play than a ball in the air." We are therefore in the realm of pure referee interpretation. While waiting for our referees' analysis, my personal view is that the ball's trajectory was absolutely not altered by Matanović's "hair". Therefore, Veiga made a deliberate play, as he had time to coordinate his movement to head the ball. Furthermore, since the ball was not heading towards the goal, it cannot be considered a save. Consequently, he would have played the Croatian player behind him (Pašalić) onside. HNS Portugal #WC2026 #Refereeing
0:21

🚨 Regarding Croatia's disallowed goal, this "super slow-motion" replay shows that the ball was indeed almost certainly touched by Matanović—at the very least, a graze of the hair. We can obviously question the "spirit" of how the rules are applied here, but since technology allows us to detect even the slightest micro-touch of the ball, we might as well use it. 🤯 HOWEVER, the main aspect of this decision to analyze is the subsequent header deflection by Veiga. Indeed, two questions arise here (in relation to the Laws of the Game): - Was it a "deliberate play" on his part or not ? If it is deliberate, he plays the Croatian player behind him onside. If it is not, offside should be called. - Was it a save ? (i.e., "preventing or attempting to prevent the ball from going into or very close to the goal"). If it is a save, then offside must be called. According to the Laws of the Game: "The following criteria should be used, as appropriate, as indicators that a player had control of the ball and, as a result, can be considered to have 'deliberately played' the ball: - The ball had travelled from distance and the player had a clear view of it; - The ball was not moving quickly; - The direction of the ball was not unexpected; - The player had time to coordinate their body movement, i.e. it was not a case of instinctive stretching or jumping, or a movement that achieved limited contact/control; - A ball on the ground is much easier to play than a ball in the air." We are therefore in the realm of pure referee interpretation. While waiting for our referees' analysis, my personal view is that the ball's trajectory was absolutely not altered by Matanović's "hair". Therefore, Veiga made a deliberate play, as he had time to coordinate his movement to head the ball. Furthermore, since the ball was not heading towards the goal, it cannot be considered a save. Consequently, he would have played the Croatian player behind him (Pašalić) onside. HNS Portugal #WC2026 #Refereeing

Check VAR World Cup

74,430 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The cannonball has officially been lifted! No musket ball was found near the skull of the horse, indicating that it was not euthanised in the trench like the others - it was likely killed by the cannonball nearby and then dragged into the trench to be buried.
0:48

The cannonball has officially been lifted! No musket ball was found near the skull of the horse, indicating that it was not euthanised in the trench like the others - it was likely killed by the cannonball nearby and then dragged into the trench to be buried.

Waterloo Uncovered

10,576 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A small chip inside this year’s World Cup match ball is helping referees make faster and more accurate calls. The sensor tracks the ball’s movement 500 times per second, capturing every touch and movement in real time. This gives officials more precise data to review during key moments of the match, according to Adidas, the company behind the "smart" ball. Because the sensor needs power, the ball needs to be charged before kickoff. Here’s how it works. Editor’s note: A previous version of this video incorrectly described the rechargeable built-in sensor in the World Cup match ball. This year's was the second to have that capability, not the first.
1:48

A small chip inside this year’s World Cup match ball is helping referees make faster and more accurate calls. The sensor tracks the ball’s movement 500 times per second, capturing every touch and movement in real time. This gives officials more precise data to review during key moments of the match, according to Adidas, the company behind the "smart" ball. Because the sensor needs power, the ball needs to be charged before kickoff. Here’s how it works. Editor’s note: A previous version of this video incorrectly described the rechargeable built-in sensor in the World Cup match ball. This year's was the second to have that capability, not the first.

TIME

63,310 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

The realization over the last two extensions has come home to roost. There is not going to be a purchase of TikTok with the Chinese algorithm. We know that we can't buy the algorithm so we're gonna have to rewrite this whole thing, but while we're doing that, we're gonna try and solve for all the litigation that social media gets all stemming from the fact that the platform owns the data and the customer doesn't. I think we're gonna have to fix that. So our proposal is to fix that and not use the Chinese algorithm. When you issue a chip, let's say you take an NVIDIA chip, that chip is a queen bee. It sits in the center of the hive and every programmer that uses that chip is the honeybee. It spends millions of hours training on that chip, learning that chip, writing code for that chip and developing AI for that chip. That's the honey. There's only gonna be two kinds of honey on Earth. American or Chinese. Now if you want the world to be running on Chinese honey, stop shipping American queen bee chips, and that is what is happening right now.
6:11

The realization over the last two extensions has come home to roost. There is not going to be a purchase of TikTok with the Chinese algorithm. We know that we can't buy the algorithm so we're gonna have to rewrite this whole thing, but while we're doing that, we're gonna try and solve for all the litigation that social media gets all stemming from the fact that the platform owns the data and the customer doesn't. I think we're gonna have to fix that. So our proposal is to fix that and not use the Chinese algorithm. When you issue a chip, let's say you take an NVIDIA chip, that chip is a queen bee. It sits in the center of the hive and every programmer that uses that chip is the honeybee. It spends millions of hours training on that chip, learning that chip, writing code for that chip and developing AI for that chip. That's the honey. There's only gonna be two kinds of honey on Earth. American or Chinese. Now if you want the world to be running on Chinese honey, stop shipping American queen bee chips, and that is what is happening right now.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

43,532 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A soccer ball has a “pressure sensor” inside of it, that can detect a hair follicle, but the NFL still measures first downs with sticks and chains like it’s the Amish raising a barn (Ps- Yes I know about “hawk eye”. A few 8K cameras that measures the distance between two GUESSES. The ref is still eyeballing the spot under a pile of bodies, while the ball supposedly has a chip in it that they refuse to use. They automated the ruler- and not the guess. Why? My point stands. It’s to maintain plausible deniability. Look it up)
5:51

A soccer ball has a “pressure sensor” inside of it, that can detect a hair follicle, but the NFL still measures first downs with sticks and chains like it’s the Amish raising a barn (Ps- Yes I know about “hawk eye”. A few 8K cameras that measures the distance between two GUESSES. The ref is still eyeballing the spot under a pile of bodies, while the ball supposedly has a chip in it that they refuse to use. They automated the ruler- and not the guess. Why? My point stands. It’s to maintain plausible deniability. Look it up)

Dante 🇺🇸

141,022 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A great example of why tree ties must be fixed firmly to stakes. The stem abrasion damage is obvious. It was the same for all the trees. It's a catalogue of incompetence in every aspect, from design to contract oversight, on the A27 near Lewes. Disappointing, isn't it!
0:39

A great example of why tree ties must be fixed firmly to stakes. The stem abrasion damage is obvious. It was the same for all the trees. It's a catalogue of incompetence in every aspect, from design to contract oversight, on the A27 near Lewes. Disappointing, isn't it!

Jeremy Barrell

22,750 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🎙️ Tidjane Salaun on his Summer League mindset: "Trying to be better at everything... just compete, have the opportunity to show improvement, and gain trust from the coach." "That comes from the culture of the Hornets: Play together, share the ball, and just be sharp with it."
0:26

🎙️ Tidjane Salaun on his Summer League mindset: "Trying to be better at everything... just compete, have the opportunity to show improvement, and gain trust from the coach." "That comes from the culture of the Hornets: Play together, share the ball, and just be sharp with it."

r/CharlotteHornets

19,420 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

And to think he was on the verge on leaving to the Croatian league, until that preseason 🫡
0:34

And to think he was on the verge on leaving to the Croatian league, until that preseason 🫡

Barça Buzz

55,129 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Straight from the horses mouth: "In my Lakers runs, I wasn't the best player on the team." We've been trying to tell you that Kobe was the best player, but don't take it from me...
0:36

Straight from the horses mouth: "In my Lakers runs, I wasn't the best player on the team." We've been trying to tell you that Kobe was the best player, but don't take it from me...

@FaithWorks

168,361 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The The Oregonian failed to ask Chandler Patey about the violent Antifa assault suspects that he has allowed to be harbored in his apartment unit near ICE, also known as the Antifa safehouse, in their latest hit piece. I’d ask why this important matter was omitted from the story, but it’s obvious that this paper cannot be salvaged.
0:58

The The Oregonian failed to ask Chandler Patey about the violent Antifa assault suspects that he has allowed to be harbored in his apartment unit near ICE, also known as the Antifa safehouse, in their latest hit piece. I’d ask why this important matter was omitted from the story, but it’s obvious that this paper cannot be salvaged.

Katie Daviscourt 📸

81,699 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

DO YOU HAVE THE MOTOR TO BE THE BEST PLAYER? Players underestimate how hard it is to be the best player on a team or on the floor every night. To go out and score the ball while impacting the game in multiple ways takes alot of energy, effort, and resilience. Then, to go out and do that consistently on a night in and night out basis is even harder.
0:49

DO YOU HAVE THE MOTOR TO BE THE BEST PLAYER? Players underestimate how hard it is to be the best player on a team or on the floor every night. To go out and score the ball while impacting the game in multiple ways takes alot of energy, effort, and resilience. Then, to go out and do that consistently on a night in and night out basis is even harder.

Steve Dagostino

31,090 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

ELON MUSK: "The AI 5 chip which is going to be a great chip. All of Tesla hinges on that chip. That's the chip that going to our next gen self driving cars and it's also essential for Optimus. So that chip program was in bad shape. It wasn't on the path to success and we also had the DOJO program which was also doing okay but not on a path to be competitive with NVIDIA. So I collapsed the two programs into just one program to get everyone focused on the AI5 chip. It's performance per watt is extremely good. It is probably going to be at least 2-3 times better than NVIDIA performance per watt and 10% cost of the NVIDIA chip something like that."
1:52

ELON MUSK: "The AI 5 chip which is going to be a great chip. All of Tesla hinges on that chip. That's the chip that going to our next gen self driving cars and it's also essential for Optimus. So that chip program was in bad shape. It wasn't on the path to success and we also had the DOJO program which was also doing okay but not on a path to be competitive with NVIDIA. So I collapsed the two programs into just one program to get everyone focused on the AI5 chip. It's performance per watt is extremely good. It is probably going to be at least 2-3 times better than NVIDIA performance per watt and 10% cost of the NVIDIA chip something like that."

DogeDesigner

265,257 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

This is how you drop a ball the right way, according to the Rules: 1. You, the player, must drop the ball 2. You must drop straight down from knee height without the ball touching your body or equipment 3. The ball must be dropped in the relief area or directly on the line
0:55

This is how you drop a ball the right way, according to the Rules: 1. You, the player, must drop the ball 2. You must drop straight down from knee height without the ball touching your body or equipment 3. The ball must be dropped in the relief area or directly on the line

USGA

46,494 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨🚨Marnus Labuschagne on the change of ball color "I did say to the umpires after the second over, What’s going on? The ball is red, it must be from the clothes or something like that. I’ve never seen anything like
0:36

🚨🚨Marnus Labuschagne on the change of ball color "I did say to the umpires after the second over, What’s going on? The ball is red, it must be from the clothes or something like that. I’ve never seen anything like

SheR•ALI

322,227 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The 3D data from FIFA's cameras around the stadium seem to contradict FIFA's official statement that the ball never made contact with the camera cable in Norway vs England. FIFA has 16 dedicated high resolution optical cameras positioned around every World Cup stadium to capture player and ball movements throughout the match. They use these to create the precise 3D renderings of gameplay which are used in-game for things like offsides graphics and then also used by broadcasters to create programming visuals. In this rendering, you can see the ball "hitch" in the air at the moment it supposedly contacted the cable. Now that by itself is interesting, but the part that really convinces me is the behavior of the English player that comes up to play the ball. This is especially clear in the second wide-angle shot. Watch his angle on the ball. Watch what angle he takes before the ball hitches in the air and then after. He clearly has to adjust his angle to play the ball...and suspiciously, that adjustment happens right after it takes that hitch and appears to change trajectory. To me, this is fairly compelling evidence that the ball hit the cable. This brings up a very interesting point though...this comes from FIFA's data. They would have had access to this in their analysis of the event. Which begs the question...why would they release some statement claiming no evidence of the ball contacting the cable existed when their own data seems to suggest that it did? Just adds to the mounting list of procedural questions that have really overshadowed the actual gameplay of this World Cup.
1:08

The 3D data from FIFA's cameras around the stadium seem to contradict FIFA's official statement that the ball never made contact with the camera cable in Norway vs England. FIFA has 16 dedicated high resolution optical cameras positioned around every World Cup stadium to capture player and ball movements throughout the match. They use these to create the precise 3D renderings of gameplay which are used in-game for things like offsides graphics and then also used by broadcasters to create programming visuals. In this rendering, you can see the ball "hitch" in the air at the moment it supposedly contacted the cable. Now that by itself is interesting, but the part that really convinces me is the behavior of the English player that comes up to play the ball. This is especially clear in the second wide-angle shot. Watch his angle on the ball. Watch what angle he takes before the ball hitches in the air and then after. He clearly has to adjust his angle to play the ball...and suspiciously, that adjustment happens right after it takes that hitch and appears to change trajectory. To me, this is fairly compelling evidence that the ball hit the cable. This brings up a very interesting point though...this comes from FIFA's data. They would have had access to this in their analysis of the event. Which begs the question...why would they release some statement claiming no evidence of the ball contacting the cable existed when their own data seems to suggest that it did? Just adds to the mounting list of procedural questions that have really overshadowed the actual gameplay of this World Cup.

Mark Valorian

149,375 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Various columns of the Croatian army including towed howitzers, tanks and other weapons were seen on Croatian highways these days. It is most likely about going to the final exercise, that is, preparing for the military parade that will be held on July 31 in Zagreb. 🇭🇷
0:31

Various columns of the Croatian army including towed howitzers, tanks and other weapons were seen on Croatian highways these days. It is most likely about going to the final exercise, that is, preparing for the military parade that will be held on July 31 in Zagreb. 🇭🇷

Jan 🇭🇷🎖️

14,845 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr