正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The first nuclear use since 1945 could be sold as a harmless demonstration shot on an empty Iranian mountain... Pickaxe Mountain sits on the reported target list, buried too deep for conventional bombs, and a scenario circulating among military analysts goes like this: a nuclear bunker buster, framed...

323,496 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Pauline Hanson’s Nuclear Word Salad OH MY GOD. 😂 #PaulineHanson has produced what may be her finest piece of nuclear word salad yet. She was asked a very simple question: How many nuclear reactors does #OneNation actually want, and does the government need to fund them? < AND DOES THE GOVERNMENT need to fund them? Her answer starts reasonably enough: ⛐ “Put in a reactor.” Then the Hanson sentence generator kicks in: ⛐ “To start with one, it all comes down to if you can afford it as well, as a nation.” WHAT DOES THAT SENTENCE MEAN? 😂 “To start with one” — okay, one what? “It all comes down to if you can afford it” — afford WHAT? “As well, as a nation” — as well as WHAT? And then, without actually finishing the thought, she simply abandons the sentence and changes direction: “And I'd like the reactor to go on the east coast.” Righto. Geography solved. Then: “Build one and deliver the power.” Excellent. A nuclear reactor has now been reduced to “build one.” But then comes the pièce de résistance: “The more we can get power out to the people, we will increase industries, manufacturing, and leave the energy cost on people.” 𖧀 LEAVE THE ENERGY COST ON PEOPLE. What? Did she mean reduce energy costs? Did she mean lower energy costs? Did she mean pass energy costs on to people? Nobody knows. Because she has started one sentence, wandered into another, thrown “industries” and “manufacturing” into the middle of it, and then crashed directly into: LEAVE THE ENERGY COST ON PEOPLE. And THAT is apparently One Nation's nuclear energy policy. →One reactor. →Somewhere on the east coast. →If we can afford it. →Build one. →Deliver the power. →Increase industries. →Manufacturing. →Leave the energy cost on people. Question unanswered. Sentence unfinished. Policy missing. But hey... #nuclear 😂 She really is DUMBER than a pie full of pimples.

The Noisy Elephant

13,544 次观看 • 23 天前

‼️‼️🇷🇺☢️ BREAKING | Russian state television is once again normalizing nuclear blackmail, with propagandists openly discussing demonstrative nuclear use and even the possibility of escalating to a real strike against the United Kingdom if the West refuses to back down. During the discussion, one speaker argued that Russia should conduct an actual nuclear test to force the world to witness a visible demonstration of Kremlin power, while another went further and advocated demonstrative nuclear strikes as a means of coercion. The rhetoric then escalated to the suggestion that, if the West failed to respond, Russia should consider a direct nuclear attack on British territory. Expert Konstantin Simonov added that Russia would struggle in a conventional war against Europe because of its demographic, technological and economic disadvantages, and argued that nuclear coercion therefore remains Moscow’s most powerful instrument for forcing European states to disengage from the war. The significance is less about whether such threats are operational policy and more about how openly nuclear escalation is being mainstreamed inside Russia’s state-controlled information space. The message is designed to compensate for conventional weakness by convincing European societies that continued support for Ukraine carries unacceptable risk. In practice, this is nuclear intimidation as strategic messaging: if Moscow cannot dominate Europe conventionally, it wants fear of escalation to do the work instead. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

20,292 次观看 • 14 天前