Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

The first quantum-safe Bitcoin transaction has been mined on Mainnet, without changing the Bitcoin protocol. In the new Quantum Bitcoin Countdown episode, The Bitcoin Historian and Nathan Jeffay sit down with Avihu Levy ✨🐺 to unpack QSB: how it works, its limitations, costs, and what Bitcoin still needs before...

StarkWareLtd's profile picture

StarkWare 🥷

232,580 subscribers

11,069 views • 10 days ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 Comments

StarkWare 🥷's profile picture
StarkWare 🥷10 days ago

Listen directly on YouTube:

Miguel's profile picture
Miguel10 days ago

@pete_rizzo_ @NathanOnCrypto @avihu28 Starknet/Starkware is built different! The hard work will pay of

Nadai's profile picture
Nadai10 days ago

@pete_rizzo_ @NathanOnCrypto @avihu28 Nice episode 😍

Niko Petrov's profile picture
Niko Petrov10 days ago

@pete_rizzo_ @NathanOnCrypto @avihu28 We ran a test on Base last month and gas costs were brutal for this size of tx.

Tano's profile picture
Tano10 days ago

@pete_rizzo_ @NathanOnCrypto @avihu28 send it

Validatus.com's profile picture
Validatus.com10 days ago

@pete_rizzo_ @NathanOnCrypto @avihu28 This is a good step toward the quantum risk discussion, showing a real mainnet transaction without a Bitcoin protocol change makes the idea much easier to evaluate.

Brother Sefirot 𒉭🥷🏼's profile picture
Brother Sefirot 𒉭🥷🏼10 days ago

@pete_rizzo_ @NathanOnCrypto @avihu28 QSB gud tech.

Doodlebug inventor of Chaoskey+'s profile picture
Doodlebug inventor of Chaoskey+9 days ago

@pete_rizzo_ @NathanOnCrypto @avihu28 I'm trying to help.

Related Videos

Is Quantum FUD BS? with James O'Beirne | SLP721 jamesob, Bitcoin developer joins me to discuss quantum hype vs reality, developer trade-offs, protocol upgrade challenges, and what it means for self-custody, UX, and Bitcoin’s long-term adoption. (00:00) - Intro (00:46) - What is the deal with quantum computing and Bitcoin? (05:05) - Advancing progress in quantum computing (09:43) - Is the quantum threat to Bitcoin around the corner? (11:57) - Quantum resistant schemes developed by Bitcoiners (15:45) - NIST and diverse views on Post-quantum cryptography (22:31) - The future of Bitcoin in a Post-quantum world (29:45) - 'Matt Corallo (Matt Corallo 🟠) Quantum Plan' (34:08) - A modest version of the Big Blocker view (38:41) - Covenants and Scaling Bitcoin (43:35) - Comparing OP_TEMPLATEHASH & OP_CTV (48:01) - The ‘Slow and Steady’ approach to Bitcoin development (55:19) - What’s the next adoption pathway for Bitcoin? (1:04:04) - AssumeUTXO, Utreexo & Floresta (1:07:20) - Why are so few people running Bitcoin nodes? (1:14:52) - Closing thoughts
1:18:57

Is Quantum FUD BS? with James O'Beirne | SLP721 jamesob, Bitcoin developer joins me to discuss quantum hype vs reality, developer trade-offs, protocol upgrade challenges, and what it means for self-custody, UX, and Bitcoin’s long-term adoption. (00:00) - Intro (00:46) - What is the deal with quantum computing and Bitcoin? (05:05) - Advancing progress in quantum computing (09:43) - Is the quantum threat to Bitcoin around the corner? (11:57) - Quantum resistant schemes developed by Bitcoiners (15:45) - NIST and diverse views on Post-quantum cryptography (22:31) - The future of Bitcoin in a Post-quantum world (29:45) - 'Matt Corallo (Matt Corallo 🟠) Quantum Plan' (34:08) - A modest version of the Big Blocker view (38:41) - Covenants and Scaling Bitcoin (43:35) - Comparing OP_TEMPLATEHASH & OP_CTV (48:01) - The ‘Slow and Steady’ approach to Bitcoin development (55:19) - What’s the next adoption pathway for Bitcoin? (1:04:04) - AssumeUTXO, Utreexo & Floresta (1:07:20) - Why are so few people running Bitcoin nodes? (1:14:52) - Closing thoughts

Stephan Livera

17,889 views • 7 months ago

What do Bitcoiners do about Quantum? with Matt Corallo | SLP719 Matt Corallo 🟠, Bitcoin & Lightning developer at Spiral joins me to discuss the threat of Q-Day on Bitcoin, and his ideas on how to gracefully deal with it. (00:00) - Intro (00:51) - Quantum computing timelines (03:38) - Are Bitcoin developers taking the quantum threat seriously? (07:41) - Evaluating the quantum threat (10:00) - The 'Matt Corallo Quantum Plan' (17:48) - Future community decisions on quantum security (20:12) - Will Bitcoin need a soft fork? (23:30) - Market response to quantum threat (28:15) - The role of seed phrases in quantum security (33:40) - Post quantum cryptographic schemes (37:23) - Patoshi miner adapting to Q-Day (43:25) - Which public cryptography scheme is most suitable? (50:20) - Closing thoughts
51:08

What do Bitcoiners do about Quantum? with Matt Corallo | SLP719 Matt Corallo 🟠, Bitcoin & Lightning developer at Spiral joins me to discuss the threat of Q-Day on Bitcoin, and his ideas on how to gracefully deal with it. (00:00) - Intro (00:51) - Quantum computing timelines (03:38) - Are Bitcoin developers taking the quantum threat seriously? (07:41) - Evaluating the quantum threat (10:00) - The 'Matt Corallo Quantum Plan' (17:48) - Future community decisions on quantum security (20:12) - Will Bitcoin need a soft fork? (23:30) - Market response to quantum threat (28:15) - The role of seed phrases in quantum security (33:40) - Post quantum cryptographic schemes (37:23) - Patoshi miner adapting to Q-Day (43:25) - Which public cryptography scheme is most suitable? (50:20) - Closing thoughts

Stephan Livera

23,851 views • 7 months ago

Can a sufficiently powerful quantum computer forge the signatures used to authorize Bitcoin and Ethereum transactions? What would it take to upgrade both networks before that happens? In this new lecture, Stanford cryptographer Dan Boneh explores why blockchains may turn to signatures built from hash functions. He also presents new research on threshold signing. The talk ends with the questions Bitcoin still has to answer, including whether post-quantum signatures will require larger blocks, what happens to abandoned coins, and how someone such as Satoshi could prove ownership after Bitcoin’s current signatures have been retired. 00:00 Why blockchains need to prepare for quantum computers 03:05 Why Bitcoin may bet on hash-based signatures 06:25 The “big footgun” in stateful signatures 08:58 A quantum-safe signature that takes one billion hashes 14:13 Inside SLH-DSA’s virtual tree 20:30 How Bitcoin and Ethereum could make the switch 23:48 What happens when a wallet loses its state? 32:47 Can threshold signing survive the quantum transition? 36:39 How to hide lattice cryptography from the blockchain 38:49 Why threshold one-time signatures seem impossible 45:36 How context prevents forged signatures 49:37 The forgotten idea behind Winternitz signatures 54:50 Turning one-time signatures into threshold signatures 1:04:27 Will quantum-safe signatures require bigger Bitcoin blocks? 1:06:26 Abandoned bitcoin and Satoshi’s recovery problem
1:09:36

Can a sufficiently powerful quantum computer forge the signatures used to authorize Bitcoin and Ethereum transactions? What would it take to upgrade both networks before that happens? In this new lecture, Stanford cryptographer Dan Boneh explores why blockchains may turn to signatures built from hash functions. He also presents new research on threshold signing. The talk ends with the questions Bitcoin still has to answer, including whether post-quantum signatures will require larger blocks, what happens to abandoned coins, and how someone such as Satoshi could prove ownership after Bitcoin’s current signatures have been retired. 00:00 Why blockchains need to prepare for quantum computers 03:05 Why Bitcoin may bet on hash-based signatures 06:25 The “big footgun” in stateful signatures 08:58 A quantum-safe signature that takes one billion hashes 14:13 Inside SLH-DSA’s virtual tree 20:30 How Bitcoin and Ethereum could make the switch 23:48 What happens when a wallet loses its state? 32:47 Can threshold signing survive the quantum transition? 36:39 How to hide lattice cryptography from the blockchain 38:49 Why threshold one-time signatures seem impossible 45:36 How context prevents forged signatures 49:37 The forgotten idea behind Winternitz signatures 54:50 Turning one-time signatures into threshold signatures 1:04:27 Will quantum-safe signatures require bigger Bitcoin blocks? 1:06:26 Abandoned bitcoin and Satoshi’s recovery problem

a16z crypto

118,792 views • 17 days ago

WATCH: Bitcoin's Q-Day - The Geopolitics of Quantum Computing and Capital | The Bitcoin Policy Hour Ep. 13 🗺️ On Satoshi's coins, assessing quantum risks to Bitcoin, and the nation-state game theory of quantum security research. Feat. Matthew Pines, Zack Shapiro and Zack Cohen of 🏛️ 00:00 - Intro + Crypto Week Recap 07:45 - Political Dynamics and Future of Crypto Bills 12:15 - White House Crypto Report and the SBR 16:42 - Order of Operations for Market Structure and BRCA 18:34 - Quantum Computing Summit and Bitcoin Implications 25:17 - Technical Progress and Timelines in Quantum Computing 30:21 - Quantum Threats to Bitcoin and Migration Strategies 41:39 - Political Economy and Strategic Importance of Quantum Risk for Bitcoin 43:26 - BPI's Role and Government Interest in Quantum and Bitcoin 47:03 - Risk Assessment and Market Perception of Quantum Threat 52:00 - Policy Implications and Institutional Considerations for Quantum Migration 53:47 - Closing Remarks Watch on: 🔗 YouTube: 🔗 Rumble: 🔗 Spotify:
54:42

WATCH: Bitcoin's Q-Day - The Geopolitics of Quantum Computing and Capital | The Bitcoin Policy Hour Ep. 13 🗺️ On Satoshi's coins, assessing quantum risks to Bitcoin, and the nation-state game theory of quantum security research. Feat. Matthew Pines, Zack Shapiro and Zack Cohen of 🏛️ 00:00 - Intro + Crypto Week Recap 07:45 - Political Dynamics and Future of Crypto Bills 12:15 - White House Crypto Report and the SBR 16:42 - Order of Operations for Market Structure and BRCA 18:34 - Quantum Computing Summit and Bitcoin Implications 25:17 - Technical Progress and Timelines in Quantum Computing 30:21 - Quantum Threats to Bitcoin and Migration Strategies 41:39 - Political Economy and Strategic Importance of Quantum Risk for Bitcoin 43:26 - BPI's Role and Government Interest in Quantum and Bitcoin 47:03 - Risk Assessment and Market Perception of Quantum Threat 52:00 - Policy Implications and Institutional Considerations for Quantum Migration 53:47 - Closing Remarks Watch on: 🔗 YouTube: 🔗 Rumble: 🔗 Spotify:

Bitcoin Magazine

346,944 views • 1 year ago

Who Hijacked Bitcoin? Steve Patterson and Aaron Day on DarkHorse 00:00:00 Bitcoin: The Questions That Matter 00:03:01 Sponsor: Helix 00:05:26 The Purpose of Bitcoin 00:10:52 Digital Cash 00:18:38 The Reality of Bitcoin Transactions Today 00:27:22 Sponsor: ARMRA 00:29:46 The History of Bitcoin 00:42:14 Preempting the Bitcoin Experts 00:50:20 Bitcoin History: Two Camps Emerge 00:59:57 Bitcoin History: The Mainstream Phase 01:01:59 Bitcoin Corruption: New Information from the Epstein Files 01:04:35 Government Crackdown on Crypto 01:13:25 Is Bitcoin Really Decentralized? 01:35:16 The Connection to Howard Lutnick 01:44:41 CBDCs Should Be Top of Mind 01:45:54 The Coming Financial Collapse 01:47:13 Do We Already Have a Backdoor CBDC? 01:51:44 Tokens and The Great Taking 01:56:38 The Technocracy Movement 02:00:30 Digital Currency Naivety 02:11:32 Morality as a Constraint 02:21:43 Rights as an Irritant to Power 02:23:50 Protecting Yourself 02:25:51 Fighting Back
2:42:55

Who Hijacked Bitcoin? Steve Patterson and Aaron Day on DarkHorse 00:00:00 Bitcoin: The Questions That Matter 00:03:01 Sponsor: Helix 00:05:26 The Purpose of Bitcoin 00:10:52 Digital Cash 00:18:38 The Reality of Bitcoin Transactions Today 00:27:22 Sponsor: ARMRA 00:29:46 The History of Bitcoin 00:42:14 Preempting the Bitcoin Experts 00:50:20 Bitcoin History: Two Camps Emerge 00:59:57 Bitcoin History: The Mainstream Phase 01:01:59 Bitcoin Corruption: New Information from the Epstein Files 01:04:35 Government Crackdown on Crypto 01:13:25 Is Bitcoin Really Decentralized? 01:35:16 The Connection to Howard Lutnick 01:44:41 CBDCs Should Be Top of Mind 01:45:54 The Coming Financial Collapse 01:47:13 Do We Already Have a Backdoor CBDC? 01:51:44 Tokens and The Great Taking 01:56:38 The Technocracy Movement 02:00:30 Digital Currency Naivety 02:11:32 Morality as a Constraint 02:21:43 Rights as an Irritant to Power 02:23:50 Protecting Yourself 02:25:51 Fighting Back

The DarkHorse Podcast

88,842 views • 6 months ago

BITCOIN RAILS EPISODE #18: MAKE BITCOIN QUANTUM RESISTANT | with BIP360 author Hunter Beast Hunter Beast 🕯️ Quantum computing is a complicated topic—one that incites equal amounts of fear and skepticism depending on who you talk to… especially in Bitcoin. In this episode, BIP360 author Hunter Beast wisely shares why the “truth is likely somewhere in the middle,” citing incremental advancements in quantum computing that may eventually pose a legitimate threat to some Bitcoin addresses—as well as steps we can take to protect ourselves in the short, medium and long term. The correct posture is to “be prepared, not scared,” says Hunter Beast 🕯️ Ultimately, the introduction of quantum resistant cryptography—via proposals like BIP360—will be needed for higher degrees of security. That said, individuals can mitigate personal risk substantially through proper address-use hygiene. This episode breaks down the specific challenges Bitcoin will face in the event of a quantum attack, the likelihood of an attack over time, and the steps we’ll need to take at the individual and communal level to ensure Bitcoin’s safety. This episode includes detailed discussion of: 1) How quantum computing could potentially affect Bitcoin public/private key cryptography—and technologies built on vulnerable addresses (e.g. Taproot) 2) Best practices for protecting yourself against quantum in the short and long term 3) Implications of vulnerable address types—e.g. what about Satoshi’s coins? 4) Deep Dive into BIP360 + proposed long-term solutions 5) Industry roadmaps for quantum computing + how banks and governments are preparing for “Q Day” As always, this episode can be viewed on Spotify or YouTuve—full episode in the comments or linktree in my bio. This episode is powered by Best In Slot—the leading API for Ordinals and BRC20 data aggregation and indexing. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 02:05 What is quantum computing? 04:30 How could quantum threaten your Bitcoin wallet? 06:50 Addresses that are safe from quantum 09:13 Satoshi’s coins are in danger! 11:25 What happens if Satoshi’s coins are touched? 14:45 Do we softfork to shield Satoshi’s coins? 16:38 “Transitory inflation” for bitcoin after quantum 21:05 Why Taproot addresses are vulnerable 23:50 Do NOT reuse your Bitcoin addresses! 26:03 When will Quantum become a threat? 28:34 The long/short exposure attack; explained 31:45 Protection using private mempools 33:20 Why all the new Bitcoin L2s are in danger 37:45 Quantum is 5 to 10 years away, governments fear 40:34 Non-Bitcoin systems threatened by quantum 42:26 Centralized systems can adapt to quantum 43:50 Hunter’s BIP: Post quantum cryptography in Bitcoin 47:40 Hunter’s three new signature algorithms 53:48 Is new cryptography on Bitcoin risky? 56:33 Why not just stick to hash-based cryptography? 58:49 A 16X discount for quantum resistant addresses? 01:02:30 Creating quantum resistant multisig addresses 01:04:00 What is Frost? 01:06:50 The long process of approving a BIP 01:08:30 What developers think of Hunter’s BIP 01:10:00 Matt Corallo’s concerns with Hunter’s approach 01:11:00 Steps to implementing the BIP 360 01:17:00 Where to learn more about BIP 360 01:17:50 Who can push the button to change Bitcoin?
1:23:12

BITCOIN RAILS EPISODE #18: MAKE BITCOIN QUANTUM RESISTANT | with BIP360 author Hunter Beast Hunter Beast 🕯️ Quantum computing is a complicated topic—one that incites equal amounts of fear and skepticism depending on who you talk to… especially in Bitcoin. In this episode, BIP360 author Hunter Beast wisely shares why the “truth is likely somewhere in the middle,” citing incremental advancements in quantum computing that may eventually pose a legitimate threat to some Bitcoin addresses—as well as steps we can take to protect ourselves in the short, medium and long term. The correct posture is to “be prepared, not scared,” says Hunter Beast 🕯️ Ultimately, the introduction of quantum resistant cryptography—via proposals like BIP360—will be needed for higher degrees of security. That said, individuals can mitigate personal risk substantially through proper address-use hygiene. This episode breaks down the specific challenges Bitcoin will face in the event of a quantum attack, the likelihood of an attack over time, and the steps we’ll need to take at the individual and communal level to ensure Bitcoin’s safety. This episode includes detailed discussion of: 1) How quantum computing could potentially affect Bitcoin public/private key cryptography—and technologies built on vulnerable addresses (e.g. Taproot) 2) Best practices for protecting yourself against quantum in the short and long term 3) Implications of vulnerable address types—e.g. what about Satoshi’s coins? 4) Deep Dive into BIP360 + proposed long-term solutions 5) Industry roadmaps for quantum computing + how banks and governments are preparing for “Q Day” As always, this episode can be viewed on Spotify or YouTuve—full episode in the comments or linktree in my bio. This episode is powered by Best In Slot—the leading API for Ordinals and BRC20 data aggregation and indexing. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 02:05 What is quantum computing? 04:30 How could quantum threaten your Bitcoin wallet? 06:50 Addresses that are safe from quantum 09:13 Satoshi’s coins are in danger! 11:25 What happens if Satoshi’s coins are touched? 14:45 Do we softfork to shield Satoshi’s coins? 16:38 “Transitory inflation” for bitcoin after quantum 21:05 Why Taproot addresses are vulnerable 23:50 Do NOT reuse your Bitcoin addresses! 26:03 When will Quantum become a threat? 28:34 The long/short exposure attack; explained 31:45 Protection using private mempools 33:20 Why all the new Bitcoin L2s are in danger 37:45 Quantum is 5 to 10 years away, governments fear 40:34 Non-Bitcoin systems threatened by quantum 42:26 Centralized systems can adapt to quantum 43:50 Hunter’s BIP: Post quantum cryptography in Bitcoin 47:40 Hunter’s three new signature algorithms 53:48 Is new cryptography on Bitcoin risky? 56:33 Why not just stick to hash-based cryptography? 58:49 A 16X discount for quantum resistant addresses? 01:02:30 Creating quantum resistant multisig addresses 01:04:00 What is Frost? 01:06:50 The long process of approving a BIP 01:08:30 What developers think of Hunter’s BIP 01:10:00 Matt Corallo’s concerns with Hunter’s approach 01:11:00 Steps to implementing the BIP 360 01:17:00 Where to learn more about BIP 360 01:17:50 Who can push the button to change Bitcoin?

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

31,148 views • 1 year ago

LIVE NOW - Ethereum’s Quantum Plan Before Q-Day Quantum is no longer a distant thought experiment. Justin Drake joins Bankless to unpack: - when Q-Day could actually arriv,e - why Bitcoin and Ethereum face very different quantum risks, - what Ethereum’s post-quantum roadmap looks like, - why this upgrade could be bigger than the Merge, - and how quantum could become Ethereum’s chance to lead. --- TIMESTAMPS 0:00 When is Q-Day? 5:35 The moment quantum becomes crypto-relevant 10:11 How many qubits does it take to break crypto? 16:22 What a real Bitcoin quantum attack would look like 20:19 How much Bitcoin is actually vulnerable? 26:26 Burn, freeze, or salvage? Bitcoin’s impossible choice 35:06 Proof of seed phrase and Bitcoin’s post-quantum bottleneck 41:02 Ethereum’s exposure: smaller, but not zero 45:43 Ethereum’s tougher roadmap: three layers, three upgrades 50:29 The execution-layer plan: replace ECDSA without killing throughput 57:56 Post-quantum, post-AI cryptography 1:03:36 BLS, KZG, LeanVM, and the rest of the stack 1:06:42 Is this bigger than the Merge? 1:17:21 If Bitcoin stumbles, does all crypto stumble too? 1:19:35 “Quantum is not a challenge—it’s an opportunity” 1:21:27 AI, quantum, crypto and the 2032 convergence 1:28:04 Harvest now, decrypt later 1:30:09 Defensive accelerationism and Ethereum’s role 1:39:10 Stoicism, P-doom, and why he keeps building
1:44:00

LIVE NOW - Ethereum’s Quantum Plan Before Q-Day Quantum is no longer a distant thought experiment. Justin Drake joins Bankless to unpack: - when Q-Day could actually arriv,e - why Bitcoin and Ethereum face very different quantum risks, - what Ethereum’s post-quantum roadmap looks like, - why this upgrade could be bigger than the Merge, - and how quantum could become Ethereum’s chance to lead. --- TIMESTAMPS 0:00 When is Q-Day? 5:35 The moment quantum becomes crypto-relevant 10:11 How many qubits does it take to break crypto? 16:22 What a real Bitcoin quantum attack would look like 20:19 How much Bitcoin is actually vulnerable? 26:26 Burn, freeze, or salvage? Bitcoin’s impossible choice 35:06 Proof of seed phrase and Bitcoin’s post-quantum bottleneck 41:02 Ethereum’s exposure: smaller, but not zero 45:43 Ethereum’s tougher roadmap: three layers, three upgrades 50:29 The execution-layer plan: replace ECDSA without killing throughput 57:56 Post-quantum, post-AI cryptography 1:03:36 BLS, KZG, LeanVM, and the rest of the stack 1:06:42 Is this bigger than the Merge? 1:17:21 If Bitcoin stumbles, does all crypto stumble too? 1:19:35 “Quantum is not a challenge—it’s an opportunity” 1:21:27 AI, quantum, crypto and the 2032 convergence 1:28:04 Harvest now, decrypt later 1:30:09 Defensive accelerationism and Ethereum’s role 1:39:10 Stoicism, P-doom, and why he keeps building

Bankless

50,230 views • 5 months ago

🎙️Britain's War on Freedom, Privacy, Speech and Bitcoin Ep. 157 with Freddie New Freddie New is a lawyer turned Bitcoin executive, CEO and co-founder of B HODL ⚡, a Bitcoin treasury and Lightning services company, and co-founder of Bitcoin Policy UK. He grew up in Zimbabwe, a country that has cycled through five currencies in his lifetime, and he took from it a lasting impression of lawyers and judges as the people who stand up hardest against government overreach. In this conversation Freddie unpacks what is behind the UK’s child safety framing of internet age gating, why 12,000 people were jailed over social media posts, how banks create money, why he thinks large scale currency collapse is where the debt story ends, and his view on bitcoin as Digital Credit. → Please like, comment, share & subscribe, to help me beat the suppressing algo's. Thank you! 00:00 - Coming Up... 01:42 - How Freddie & Efrat Met 03:41 - Introduction: Freddie New B HODL, Bitcoin Policy UK and a Lawyer's 07:05 - Scanning Every Device in the UK and Child Safety Pretext 09:22 - Digital ID: Centralised Honeypot of Personal Data 11:39 - Ad-Break: Expat Money & Ledn 13:54 - Why Freddie Cares: Orwell, Huxley & the Duty to Act 15:57 - If the Protocol Needs No Permission, Why Does Policy Matter? 19:39 - Why Is Control Tightening in the UK 28:00 - How Is Money Created & Why Currencies Collapse 31:16 - Why Digital Privacy Matters 36:51 - Lightning as a Business: B HODL 43:43 - Ad-Break: Trezor & Abundant Mines 45:30 - Bitcoin Backed Credit vs Bitcoin as Money 51:26 - Where Is The UK Heading, With Bitcoin & In General 55:26 - For Brits Still Afraid of Bitcoin 58:03 - Banning Bitcoin Means Banning Speech, Thought & Math 59:01 - Freddie's Bitcoin Journey 01:00:19 - Don't Give Up Hope
1:04:26

🎙️Britain's War on Freedom, Privacy, Speech and Bitcoin Ep. 157 with Freddie New Freddie New is a lawyer turned Bitcoin executive, CEO and co-founder of B HODL ⚡, a Bitcoin treasury and Lightning services company, and co-founder of Bitcoin Policy UK. He grew up in Zimbabwe, a country that has cycled through five currencies in his lifetime, and he took from it a lasting impression of lawyers and judges as the people who stand up hardest against government overreach. In this conversation Freddie unpacks what is behind the UK’s child safety framing of internet age gating, why 12,000 people were jailed over social media posts, how banks create money, why he thinks large scale currency collapse is where the debt story ends, and his view on bitcoin as Digital Credit. → Please like, comment, share & subscribe, to help me beat the suppressing algo's. Thank you! 00:00 - Coming Up... 01:42 - How Freddie & Efrat Met 03:41 - Introduction: Freddie New B HODL, Bitcoin Policy UK and a Lawyer's 07:05 - Scanning Every Device in the UK and Child Safety Pretext 09:22 - Digital ID: Centralised Honeypot of Personal Data 11:39 - Ad-Break: Expat Money & Ledn 13:54 - Why Freddie Cares: Orwell, Huxley & the Duty to Act 15:57 - If the Protocol Needs No Permission, Why Does Policy Matter? 19:39 - Why Is Control Tightening in the UK 28:00 - How Is Money Created & Why Currencies Collapse 31:16 - Why Digital Privacy Matters 36:51 - Lightning as a Business: B HODL 43:43 - Ad-Break: Trezor & Abundant Mines 45:30 - Bitcoin Backed Credit vs Bitcoin as Money 51:26 - Where Is The UK Heading, With Bitcoin & In General 55:26 - For Brits Still Afraid of Bitcoin 58:03 - Banning Bitcoin Means Banning Speech, Thought & Math 59:01 - Freddie's Bitcoin Journey 01:00:19 - Don't Give Up Hope

Efrat Fenigson

17,401 views • 23 days ago

“Only two steps” required to make Bitcoin quantum-resistant? In this Unchained episode, Matt Corallo 🟠 joins me to discuss: ❌ Why he thinks Nic Carter is wrong about the quantum threat to Bitcoin ⛔ Why he disagrees with Nic on his ranking of Bitcoin’s most influential developers 😱 Why “the community at that time” will deal with the quantum threat 🥷 Why making bitcoin post-quantum might require a block size increase 🔥 Why he believes “you burn old lost coins, you burn anyone who hasn't migrated” Timestamps: 🚀0:00 Introduction ⚔️02:16 What Matt says Nic is getting wrong about the quantum threat to Bitcoin 🤔08:59 What Matt says Bitcoin's quantum security roadmap could look like 🫠19:04 Do Bitcoin Core developers have any timelines? 🤯29:34 Are there only two steps required to quantum-proof Bitcoin? 📍34:04 Matt weighs in on public comments from other Bitcoin developers on the quantum threat ⁉️47:37 Why Bitcoin Core has not announced a quantum team 👀53:57 Can BlackRock “fire” Bitcoin developers? 💫58:07 What Matt says is the North Star for Bitcoin developers 🔥1:07:42 What Matt thinks will happen to lost bitcoins 🤔1:08:26 Is there any plan to secure Bitcoin against AI? 👀1:11:31 Will Bitcoin and Ethereum align on quantum security?
1:17:34

“Only two steps” required to make Bitcoin quantum-resistant? In this Unchained episode, Matt Corallo 🟠 joins me to discuss: ❌ Why he thinks Nic Carter is wrong about the quantum threat to Bitcoin ⛔ Why he disagrees with Nic on his ranking of Bitcoin’s most influential developers 😱 Why “the community at that time” will deal with the quantum threat 🥷 Why making bitcoin post-quantum might require a block size increase 🔥 Why he believes “you burn old lost coins, you burn anyone who hasn't migrated” Timestamps: 🚀0:00 Introduction ⚔️02:16 What Matt says Nic is getting wrong about the quantum threat to Bitcoin 🤔08:59 What Matt says Bitcoin's quantum security roadmap could look like 🫠19:04 Do Bitcoin Core developers have any timelines? 🤯29:34 Are there only two steps required to quantum-proof Bitcoin? 📍34:04 Matt weighs in on public comments from other Bitcoin developers on the quantum threat ⁉️47:37 Why Bitcoin Core has not announced a quantum team 👀53:57 Can BlackRock “fire” Bitcoin developers? 💫58:07 What Matt says is the North Star for Bitcoin developers 🔥1:07:42 What Matt thinks will happen to lost bitcoins 🤔1:08:26 Is there any plan to secure Bitcoin against AI? 👀1:11:31 Will Bitcoin and Ethereum align on quantum security?

Laura Shin

19,795 views • 6 months ago

Inside the debate splitting the Bitcoin community, with Hardfork Kratter. Will BIP-110 result in a chain split soon? TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Trailer and Intro 03:00 Working for Peter Thiel 05:11 How Bitcoin University started 08:07 What made Matt a Bitcoiner 10:23 Bitcoin is about sovereignty 14:56 The email attachment analogy for OP_RETURN 17:34 Brief history of Core and Knots 19:38 What BIP 110 actually does 23:01 How many nodes running Knots 26:59 Who really decides Bitcoin's rules 32:18 Could this split Bitcoin into two separate tokens? 35:52 Can't spammers just get around it? 40:23 Why Matt calls this a civil war 42:05 What happens to your coins in a chain split 44:44 Why have attacks gotten so personal? 48:05 Will Matt Kratter call Michael Saylor? 51:57 Does Bitcoin even have a spam problem? 55:05 Upholding Bitcoin’s neutrality 57:19 BIP 110 signaling Saturday 1:06:28 Why Matt says this is "life or death"
1:09:51

Inside the debate splitting the Bitcoin community, with Hardfork Kratter. Will BIP-110 result in a chain split soon? TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Trailer and Intro 03:00 Working for Peter Thiel 05:11 How Bitcoin University started 08:07 What made Matt a Bitcoiner 10:23 Bitcoin is about sovereignty 14:56 The email attachment analogy for OP_RETURN 17:34 Brief history of Core and Knots 19:38 What BIP 110 actually does 23:01 How many nodes running Knots 26:59 Who really decides Bitcoin's rules 32:18 Could this split Bitcoin into two separate tokens? 35:52 Can't spammers just get around it? 40:23 Why Matt calls this a civil war 42:05 What happens to your coins in a chain split 44:44 Why have attacks gotten so personal? 48:05 Will Matt Kratter call Michael Saylor? 51:57 Does Bitcoin even have a spam problem? 55:05 Upholding Bitcoin’s neutrality 57:19 BIP 110 signaling Saturday 1:06:28 Why Matt says this is "life or death"

Natalie Brunell ⚡️

109,040 views • 1 month ago

Bitcoin spam debates with Charlie Spears | SLP724 cbspears ◉, co-founder Blockspace joins me to discuss spam, feasibility of BIP110, protocol upgrades, on-chain data, ordinals, OPNEXT and more. (00:00) - Intro (01:13) - The BIP110 fork and filter debate (03:59) - Consensus changes vs. policy solutions (08:36) - Understanding spam and data on the Bitcoin blockchain (11:29) - Diversity of Bitcoin clients (14:29) - What is considered spam? (17:55) - Will BIP110 stop or curb spam? (24:51) - Evolution of spam tactics in Bitcoin (29:18) - The future of Ordinals (32:16) - Does Ordinals & spam make Bitcoin a worse money? (37:04) - What is ‘Bitcoin Layers’? (43:02) - What is OPNEXT 2026? (52:49) - Closing thoughts
54:58

Bitcoin spam debates with Charlie Spears | SLP724 cbspears ◉, co-founder Blockspace joins me to discuss spam, feasibility of BIP110, protocol upgrades, on-chain data, ordinals, OPNEXT and more. (00:00) - Intro (01:13) - The BIP110 fork and filter debate (03:59) - Consensus changes vs. policy solutions (08:36) - Understanding spam and data on the Bitcoin blockchain (11:29) - Diversity of Bitcoin clients (14:29) - What is considered spam? (17:55) - Will BIP110 stop or curb spam? (24:51) - Evolution of spam tactics in Bitcoin (29:18) - The future of Ordinals (32:16) - Does Ordinals & spam make Bitcoin a worse money? (37:04) - What is ‘Bitcoin Layers’? (43:02) - What is OPNEXT 2026? (52:49) - Closing thoughts

Stephan Livera

14,546 views • 6 months ago

LIVE NOW - Michael Salor’s Master Plan: "Fix the Money, Fix the World." Bitcoin to $21M. Strategy as a digital credit machine. An “8% bank account” for a billion people. Michael Michael Saylor joins Bankless for the first time to unpack: - Bitcoin becomes digital capital - Strategy’s Bitcoin credit machine - Quantum without panic - A new view on Ethereum - The “fix the money” thesis Enjoy the episode! -------------- TIMESTAMPS 0:00 Intro 1:00 Michael Saylor’s $21M Bitcoin thesis 4:33 What has to go right for Bitcoin to get there 11:00 Has Bitcoin adoption stalled out? 13:20 Why STRC became Strategy’s breakout product 18:05 The pitch behind a Bitcoin-backed money market 21:13 How STRC is engineered to stay stable 27:31 Where the 11.5% yield comes from 36:35 Is Strategy taking too much risk? 46:50 Does Strategy ever stop buying Bitcoin? 58:48 Quantum, panic, and the Bitcoin response 1:16:18 Michael Saylor on Ethereum today 1:25:46 “Fix the money, fix the world” 1:38:39 The crypto reactor and Strategy’s endgame
1:40:50

LIVE NOW - Michael Salor’s Master Plan: "Fix the Money, Fix the World." Bitcoin to $21M. Strategy as a digital credit machine. An “8% bank account” for a billion people. Michael Michael Saylor joins Bankless for the first time to unpack: - Bitcoin becomes digital capital - Strategy’s Bitcoin credit machine - Quantum without panic - A new view on Ethereum - The “fix the money” thesis Enjoy the episode! -------------- TIMESTAMPS 0:00 Intro 1:00 Michael Saylor’s $21M Bitcoin thesis 4:33 What has to go right for Bitcoin to get there 11:00 Has Bitcoin adoption stalled out? 13:20 Why STRC became Strategy’s breakout product 18:05 The pitch behind a Bitcoin-backed money market 21:13 How STRC is engineered to stay stable 27:31 Where the 11.5% yield comes from 36:35 Is Strategy taking too much risk? 46:50 Does Strategy ever stop buying Bitcoin? 58:48 Quantum, panic, and the Bitcoin response 1:16:18 Michael Saylor on Ethereum today 1:25:46 “Fix the money, fix the world” 1:38:39 The crypto reactor and Strategy’s endgame

Bankless

518,352 views • 5 months ago

Sovereign Individuals Spend & Replace Bitcoin with André Loja | SLP695 André Loja joins me to discuss how FREE Madeira is driving Bitcoin adoption through education, local merchants, and community. We also explore how the Basalto Fund lets investors gain residency in Portugal while investing in Bitcoin. (00:00) - Intro (01:54) - What is Free Madeira? (08:11) - Has Bitcoin adoption attracted people to visit Madeira? (15:07) - The experience of earning & spending Bitcoin on the island (17:43) - What is Sovereign Engineering? (24:08) - André’s business ventures in Madeira (28:36) - HODL only or Spend & Replace Bitcoin? (35:32) - What is the Basalto Fund? (41:07) - Understanding Portugal’s Golden visa process (46:14) - Basalto Fund - Fees and Performance (51:03) - How autonomous is Madeira?; Services and opportunities (56:58) - Future plans and Community development (1:00:37) - Closing thoughts
1:01:31

Sovereign Individuals Spend & Replace Bitcoin with André Loja | SLP695 André Loja joins me to discuss how FREE Madeira is driving Bitcoin adoption through education, local merchants, and community. We also explore how the Basalto Fund lets investors gain residency in Portugal while investing in Bitcoin. (00:00) - Intro (01:54) - What is Free Madeira? (08:11) - Has Bitcoin adoption attracted people to visit Madeira? (15:07) - The experience of earning & spending Bitcoin on the island (17:43) - What is Sovereign Engineering? (24:08) - André’s business ventures in Madeira (28:36) - HODL only or Spend & Replace Bitcoin? (35:32) - What is the Basalto Fund? (41:07) - Understanding Portugal’s Golden visa process (46:14) - Basalto Fund - Fees and Performance (51:03) - How autonomous is Madeira?; Services and opportunities (56:58) - Future plans and Community development (1:00:37) - Closing thoughts

Stephan Livera

26,517 views • 10 months ago

BITCOIN RAILS #69: ZERO-KNOWLEDGE PROOFS FOR POST-QUANTUM BITCOIN | with Benedikt Bünz 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌿 SPOTIFY: While many Bitcoiners remain hopeful the network will embrace zero-knowledge proofs for protocol-level use cases, practical adoption has remained limited outside of BitVM and a handful of experimental proposals. Most of the world’s ZKP research has circled around Ethereum and other ecosystems, where significant resources have been dedicated to advancing these systems, particularly for scaling and privacy applications. One of the most notable contributors to this research is Benedikt Bünz ☕️ — professor of cryptography at NYU and collaborator of Dan Boneh, who together inarguably form one of the strongest blockchain-applied cryptography teams in the world. The pair recently announced they’ll be leading the new post-quantum cryptography unit localhost research — the first dedicated PQ research effort within a major Bitcoin development organization. With Benedikt leading the charge on the use of zero-knowledge proofs for post-quantum mitigation, the question emerges: will the post-quantum transition be the catalyst to finally bring zero-knowledge proofs to Bitcoin's core protocol? In more detail, Benedikt and I discuss: - Why ZKPs haven’t been widely adopted by the Bitcoin technical community — and why the threat of quantum computers may change that posture going forward - How ZKPs could be used for signature batching to address larger post-quantum signatures in Bitcoin’s post-quantum era - Why Bitcoiners will likely prioritize hash-based signatures as an initial post-quantum scheme — rather than more efficient but less proven alternatives (e.g., lattice-based) - How ZKPs have evolved over the last decade and may finally be ready for Bitcoin’s strict requirements around trust assumptions - Why Benedikt and Dan are teaming up with localhost research to create the first post-quantum cryptography unit within a major Bitcoin development organization + what they hope to accomplish This episode of Bitcoin Rails is brought to you by: LayerTwo Labs LayerTwo Labs — developing research, software, and technologies for scaling Bitcoin via the integration of Drivechains (BIP 300/301) Hashi on Sui — a primitive for executing Bitcoin DeFi transactions, without having to trust a federated bridge or other centralized entity BitBox BitBox — an open-source Bitcoin-only hardware wallet, with smooth UX and no compromises on security. Check out Bitbox [dot] swiss and use code BITCOINRAILS to get a discount TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 — Intro 00:22 — Benedikt's background 04:10 — How Benedikt got into Bitcoin and cryptography 07:42 — First ZK project: proving exchange solvency after Mt. Gox 16:01 — ZK proofs explained 27:43 — How security gets popular & ZK proofs in Bitcoin 35:49 — Other applications of ZK proofs for Bitcoin 40:15 — Why ZK proofs haven't been adopted in Bitcoin 50:46 — Why the Bitcoin post-quantum transition needs ZK proofs 01:07:00 — Cryptographic agility and why lattices win 01:18:00 — The size problem and how SNARKs solve it 01:33:57 — Proving a Bitcoin block in a laptop in 1.5 seconds 01:37:12 — Bitcoin as the primary quantum target 01:40:47 — ZK proofs for seed phrase recovery
1:43:41

BITCOIN RAILS #69: ZERO-KNOWLEDGE PROOFS FOR POST-QUANTUM BITCOIN | with Benedikt Bünz 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌿 SPOTIFY: While many Bitcoiners remain hopeful the network will embrace zero-knowledge proofs for protocol-level use cases, practical adoption has remained limited outside of BitVM and a handful of experimental proposals. Most of the world’s ZKP research has circled around Ethereum and other ecosystems, where significant resources have been dedicated to advancing these systems, particularly for scaling and privacy applications. One of the most notable contributors to this research is Benedikt Bünz ☕️ — professor of cryptography at NYU and collaborator of Dan Boneh, who together inarguably form one of the strongest blockchain-applied cryptography teams in the world. The pair recently announced they’ll be leading the new post-quantum cryptography unit localhost research — the first dedicated PQ research effort within a major Bitcoin development organization. With Benedikt leading the charge on the use of zero-knowledge proofs for post-quantum mitigation, the question emerges: will the post-quantum transition be the catalyst to finally bring zero-knowledge proofs to Bitcoin's core protocol? In more detail, Benedikt and I discuss: - Why ZKPs haven’t been widely adopted by the Bitcoin technical community — and why the threat of quantum computers may change that posture going forward - How ZKPs could be used for signature batching to address larger post-quantum signatures in Bitcoin’s post-quantum era - Why Bitcoiners will likely prioritize hash-based signatures as an initial post-quantum scheme — rather than more efficient but less proven alternatives (e.g., lattice-based) - How ZKPs have evolved over the last decade and may finally be ready for Bitcoin’s strict requirements around trust assumptions - Why Benedikt and Dan are teaming up with localhost research to create the first post-quantum cryptography unit within a major Bitcoin development organization + what they hope to accomplish This episode of Bitcoin Rails is brought to you by: LayerTwo Labs LayerTwo Labs — developing research, software, and technologies for scaling Bitcoin via the integration of Drivechains (BIP 300/301) Hashi on Sui — a primitive for executing Bitcoin DeFi transactions, without having to trust a federated bridge or other centralized entity BitBox BitBox — an open-source Bitcoin-only hardware wallet, with smooth UX and no compromises on security. Check out Bitbox [dot] swiss and use code BITCOINRAILS to get a discount TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 — Intro 00:22 — Benedikt's background 04:10 — How Benedikt got into Bitcoin and cryptography 07:42 — First ZK project: proving exchange solvency after Mt. Gox 16:01 — ZK proofs explained 27:43 — How security gets popular & ZK proofs in Bitcoin 35:49 — Other applications of ZK proofs for Bitcoin 40:15 — Why ZK proofs haven't been adopted in Bitcoin 50:46 — Why the Bitcoin post-quantum transition needs ZK proofs 01:07:00 — Cryptographic agility and why lattices win 01:18:00 — The size problem and how SNARKs solve it 01:33:57 — Proving a Bitcoin block in a laptop in 1.5 seconds 01:37:12 — Bitcoin as the primary quantum target 01:40:47 — ZK proofs for seed phrase recovery

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

19,872 views • 1 month ago