Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

The NIH is now funding human trials for a 'universal programmable vaccine.' This tech is designed entirely by AI. It essentially turns your body into a “super antigen” factory, even for viruses that 'don’t exist yet.' Read that again.. “Viruses that don’t exist yet.” This is Gain of Function... on a biological scale. They are using AI to model theoretical threats and then forcing the human immune system to manufacture the 'solution' before the problem ever happens. Why are we trusting AI to predict the future of evolution, and why are we injecting 'antigens' for problems that haven't even emerged? I’m a medic. I’ve seen what happens when we force the body to manufacture spike proteins for threats we don't understand. We aren't lab rats, and the human immune system isn't a software platform for their AI experiments. The machine is writing its own code now. It's time to ask who owns the kill switch. God bless (Link to article in comments) Video below by Cambridge universityshow more

Harry Fisher

105,912 subscribers

14,751 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Nicole Shanahan warns of an “extinction” level risk if AI-developed mRNA vaccines are rushed into use. “What we need for the mRNA platform right now is a moratorium. It's not ready for human use.” “It delivers an inconsistent result in individuals.” “In order for our population to grow, to be strong, to be fully able-bodied, and for our human economy to thrive, we do need a moratorium on the mRNA for the time being.” “AI is a computer system. Human health is not.” “There's so many that could have been shared in yesterday's conference that are really excellent uses of AI… I heard a few that were kind of out there and if deployed too quickly could lead to an extinction event.”

Nicole Shanahan warns of an “extinction” level risk if AI-developed mRNA vaccines are rushed into use. “What we need for the mRNA platform right now is a moratorium. It's not ready for human use.” “It delivers an inconsistent result in individuals.” “In order for our population to grow, to be strong, to be fully able-bodied, and for our human economy to thrive, we do need a moratorium on the mRNA for the time being.” “AI is a computer system. Human health is not.” “There's so many that could have been shared in yesterday's conference that are really excellent uses of AI… I heard a few that were kind of out there and if deployed too quickly could lead to an extinction event.”

End Tribalism in Politics

572,290 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Lex Fridman asked Elon Musk what the meaning of life is. His answer was not what anyone expected. We do not know, he said. And that is exactly why we need to expand consciousness. Not to find the answer. To ask better questions. He believes the universe is full of things we cannot even formulate yet. We are like children trying to understand calculus. The problem is not that calculus is too hard. The problem is that we have not developed enough to know it exists. Consciousness, to him, is a tool for exploring the universe. The more of it we have, the better our questions become. The better our questions become, the closer we get to understanding what any of this means. This is why he builds rockets and brain interfaces and AI. Not because he has the answers. Because he thinks the only way to get them is to expand what we are capable of thinking. Most people spend their lives looking for meaning. Elon is building the tools to look for it at a scale we cannot yet imagine.

Lex Fridman asked Elon Musk what the meaning of life is. His answer was not what anyone expected. We do not know, he said. And that is exactly why we need to expand consciousness. Not to find the answer. To ask better questions. He believes the universe is full of things we cannot even formulate yet. We are like children trying to understand calculus. The problem is not that calculus is too hard. The problem is that we have not developed enough to know it exists. Consciousness, to him, is a tool for exploring the universe. The more of it we have, the better our questions become. The better our questions become, the closer we get to understanding what any of this means. This is why he builds rockets and brain interfaces and AI. Not because he has the answers. Because he thinks the only way to get them is to expand what we are capable of thinking. Most people spend their lives looking for meaning. Elon is building the tools to look for it at a scale we cannot yet imagine.

Shruti

16,744 görüntüleme • 24 gün önce

Larry Ellison just told every software engineer on Earth their job description is dead. Not evolving. Dead. Ellison: “The code that Oracle is writing, Oracle isn’t writing. Our AI models are writing.” This is not a startup demo. This is one of the largest infrastructure monopolies on the planet telling you it already replaced the people who built it. For fifty years, building software meant translating human intent into machine instructions. Line by line. Bug by bug. Sprint by sprint. That entire layer is gone. Ellison: “We don’t write the procedure. We declare our intent.” That sentence just made the entire engineering labor market flinch. The procedure was the job. The procedure was the paycheck. The procedure was what made a developer valuable. And now the machine does it without being asked twice. Ellison: “We just tell the model what we want the program to do, and then the AI comes up with a step-by-step process to actually do it.” You are no longer paid to build. You are paid to think. And most organizations have no idea how to evaluate that. The companies still hiring armies of developers to grind through codebases are paying salaries the machine already made worthless. Not in years. In seconds. When a company worth hundreds of billions hands the keyboard to the machine and tells you the output is better, the debate is not winding down. The debate is over. The enterprise that wins this decade does not write the best code. It removes the human from the process entirely and runs on intent alone. The programmers who survive are the ones who realize the craft is no longer typing. It is architecture. It is judgment. It is knowing what to build and why. Everything else now belongs to the machine. And the machine does not negotiate severance.

Larry Ellison just told every software engineer on Earth their job description is dead. Not evolving. Dead. Ellison: “The code that Oracle is writing, Oracle isn’t writing. Our AI models are writing.” This is not a startup demo. This is one of the largest infrastructure monopolies on the planet telling you it already replaced the people who built it. For fifty years, building software meant translating human intent into machine instructions. Line by line. Bug by bug. Sprint by sprint. That entire layer is gone. Ellison: “We don’t write the procedure. We declare our intent.” That sentence just made the entire engineering labor market flinch. The procedure was the job. The procedure was the paycheck. The procedure was what made a developer valuable. And now the machine does it without being asked twice. Ellison: “We just tell the model what we want the program to do, and then the AI comes up with a step-by-step process to actually do it.” You are no longer paid to build. You are paid to think. And most organizations have no idea how to evaluate that. The companies still hiring armies of developers to grind through codebases are paying salaries the machine already made worthless. Not in years. In seconds. When a company worth hundreds of billions hands the keyboard to the machine and tells you the output is better, the debate is not winding down. The debate is over. The enterprise that wins this decade does not write the best code. It removes the human from the process entirely and runs on intent alone. The programmers who survive are the ones who realize the craft is no longer typing. It is architecture. It is judgment. It is knowing what to build and why. Everything else now belongs to the machine. And the machine does not negotiate severance.

Dustin

534,277 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Why securing AI is harder than anyone expected and the approaching AI security crisis with Sander Schulhoff Sander is a leading researcher in the field of adversarial robustness, which is the art and science of getting AI systems to do things they shouldn't do, through jail-breaking and prompt injection. What Sander shares in this conversation is essentially that all of the AI systems we use day to day are open to being tricked into doing things they shouldn’t, that there isn’t really a solution to this problem, and that the companies that try to sell solutions for this are mostly BS. This conversation has nothing to do with AGI, this is a problem today. And that that the only reason we haven’t seen massive hacks and serious damage from AI tools is so far because they haven’t been given that much power yet, and they aren’t that widely adopted yet. But with the rise of agents (who can take actions on your behalf), and robots, and even AI powered browsers, the risk is going to increase very quickly. This is a really important topic and that opened my mind, and scared me, and it's something that we all need to have a basic understanding of as AI becomes more prevalent in our lives. Inside: 🔸 A primer on jailbreaking and prompt injection attacks 🔸 Why AI guardrails don’t work 🔸 Why we haven’t seen major AI security incidents yet (but soon will) 🔸 Why AI browser agents are extremely vulnerable 🔸 The practical steps organizations should take instead of buying ineffective security tools 🔸 Why solving this requires merging classical cybersecurity expertise with AI knowledge Listen now 👇 • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Thank you to our wonderful sponsors for supporting the podcast: 🏆 Datadog, Inc. — Now home to Eppo, the leading experimentation and feature flagging platform: 🏆 Metronome — Monetization infrastructure for modern software companies: 🏆 GoFundMe Giving Funds — Make year-end giving easy:

Why securing AI is harder than anyone expected and the approaching AI security crisis with Sander Schulhoff Sander is a leading researcher in the field of adversarial robustness, which is the art and science of getting AI systems to do things they shouldn't do, through jail-breaking and prompt injection. What Sander shares in this conversation is essentially that all of the AI systems we use day to day are open to being tricked into doing things they shouldn’t, that there isn’t really a solution to this problem, and that the companies that try to sell solutions for this are mostly BS. This conversation has nothing to do with AGI, this is a problem today. And that that the only reason we haven’t seen massive hacks and serious damage from AI tools is so far because they haven’t been given that much power yet, and they aren’t that widely adopted yet. But with the rise of agents (who can take actions on your behalf), and robots, and even AI powered browsers, the risk is going to increase very quickly. This is a really important topic and that opened my mind, and scared me, and it's something that we all need to have a basic understanding of as AI becomes more prevalent in our lives. Inside: 🔸 A primer on jailbreaking and prompt injection attacks 🔸 Why AI guardrails don’t work 🔸 Why we haven’t seen major AI security incidents yet (but soon will) 🔸 Why AI browser agents are extremely vulnerable 🔸 The practical steps organizations should take instead of buying ineffective security tools 🔸 Why solving this requires merging classical cybersecurity expertise with AI knowledge Listen now 👇 • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Thank you to our wonderful sponsors for supporting the podcast: 🏆 Datadog, Inc. — Now home to Eppo, the leading experimentation and feature flagging platform: 🏆 Metronome — Monetization infrastructure for modern software companies: 🏆 GoFundMe Giving Funds — Make year-end giving easy:

Lenny Rachitsky

61,466 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

The Architects of AI Have a Blueprint for Humanity. It’s Not What You’ve Been Sold. A chilling revelation from Whitney Webb’s analysis of the Kissinger-Schmidt doctrine on artificial intelligence. The "convenience" narrative is a facade for the elite's true ambition: a fundamental war on human perception. According to Webb's dissection of "The Age of AI," the real promise, as seen by figures like Eric Schmidt—architect of the U.S. national security state's AI roadmap—is to forever alter how humanity processes reality. Their envisioned future? - An information ecosystem dominated by AI-generated content. - That same AI acting as the omnipresent censor. - A world where humanity is gradually conditioned to depend on AI to dictate what is real and what is not. This is the ultimate perception management. They create a problem of AI-powered misinformation and propose a solution of total AI control, creating a self-justifying loop of dependency. The end goal? The deliberate creation of a two-tier society: 🔺 A Cognitively Enhanced Elite: Those who program, regulate, and are enhanced by AI. They set the objective functions and control the reality engine. 🔻 A Cognitively Diminished Underclass: The vast majority, acted upon by the AI system. They become emotionally manipulated, lose the capacity for critical thought, and are forced to outsource their thinking and even their preferences to the algorithm. This is a direct war for sovereignty over human perception. As Webb powerfully argues, the solution is not to reform this system, but to build a post-social media, post-smartphone world if we are to avoid this dystopian, post-human future. The choice is becoming stark: reclaim our cognitive autonomy or surrender to becoming managed subjects in a world we no longer understand.

The Architects of AI Have a Blueprint for Humanity. It’s Not What You’ve Been Sold. A chilling revelation from Whitney Webb’s analysis of the Kissinger-Schmidt doctrine on artificial intelligence. The "convenience" narrative is a facade for the elite's true ambition: a fundamental war on human perception. According to Webb's dissection of "The Age of AI," the real promise, as seen by figures like Eric Schmidt—architect of the U.S. national security state's AI roadmap—is to forever alter how humanity processes reality. Their envisioned future? - An information ecosystem dominated by AI-generated content. - That same AI acting as the omnipresent censor. - A world where humanity is gradually conditioned to depend on AI to dictate what is real and what is not. This is the ultimate perception management. They create a problem of AI-powered misinformation and propose a solution of total AI control, creating a self-justifying loop of dependency. The end goal? The deliberate creation of a two-tier society: 🔺 A Cognitively Enhanced Elite: Those who program, regulate, and are enhanced by AI. They set the objective functions and control the reality engine. 🔻 A Cognitively Diminished Underclass: The vast majority, acted upon by the AI system. They become emotionally manipulated, lose the capacity for critical thought, and are forced to outsource their thinking and even their preferences to the algorithm. This is a direct war for sovereignty over human perception. As Webb powerfully argues, the solution is not to reform this system, but to build a post-social media, post-smartphone world if we are to avoid this dystopian, post-human future. The choice is becoming stark: reclaim our cognitive autonomy or surrender to becoming managed subjects in a world we no longer understand.

Camus

92,909 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

David Friedberg: “Why don't we let AI models get bar certified and get medically certified?” “So if the AI models, it turns out, are actually proving to be more accurate, more thoughtful, more responsive, more reasonable, whatever metric we're using, and they pass the same criteria as one would need to pass to qualify for the bar, or to qualify for a doctor certificate, why don't we do that for the AI?” “If that then happens, then the same privilege accrues to the AI as it does to the individual human that does it.” “And now, if you extrapolate from where that takes us, if we're suddenly giving AI the same sort of privileged rights that we give to privileged humans, where's that gonna take us ultimately with respect to the overall rights for AI?”

David Friedberg: “Why don't we let AI models get bar certified and get medically certified?” “So if the AI models, it turns out, are actually proving to be more accurate, more thoughtful, more responsive, more reasonable, whatever metric we're using, and they pass the same criteria as one would need to pass to qualify for the bar, or to qualify for a doctor certificate, why don't we do that for the AI?” “If that then happens, then the same privilege accrues to the AI as it does to the individual human that does it.” “And now, if you extrapolate from where that takes us, if we're suddenly giving AI the same sort of privileged rights that we give to privileged humans, where's that gonna take us ultimately with respect to the overall rights for AI?”

The All-In Podcast

77,038 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

This is my appeal to religious leaders, policymakers, scientists, doctors, entrepreneurs, and all people of good will. Microplastics and nanoplastics are no longer just an environmental issue. They are being found in the air we breathe, the water we drink, the food we eat, and inside the human body. This is a question of health. A question of children’s future. A question of responsibility before God, before humanity, and before the world entrusted to us. From now on, I will be speaking more about this issue, because this is Spiritual Diplomacy in action: bringing together faith, science, public leadership, and human conscience to address threats that no one can solve alone. We need research. We need innovation. We need political will. And we need spiritual leaders who are not silent when creation itself is under threat. For the air we breathe. For the water we drink. For the children we love. For the life God has entrusted to us. #SpiritualDiplomat Spiritual Diplomats #Microplastics #Nanoplastics

This is my appeal to religious leaders, policymakers, scientists, doctors, entrepreneurs, and all people of good will. Microplastics and nanoplastics are no longer just an environmental issue. They are being found in the air we breathe, the water we drink, the food we eat, and inside the human body. This is a question of health. A question of children’s future. A question of responsibility before God, before humanity, and before the world entrusted to us. From now on, I will be speaking more about this issue, because this is Spiritual Diplomacy in action: bringing together faith, science, public leadership, and human conscience to address threats that no one can solve alone. We need research. We need innovation. We need political will. And we need spiritual leaders who are not silent when creation itself is under threat. For the air we breathe. For the water we drink. For the children we love. For the life God has entrusted to us. #SpiritualDiplomat Spiritual Diplomats #Microplastics #Nanoplastics

Pastor Mark Burns

30,352 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

Ryan Peterman

20,069 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang just gave us a glimpse into the future of AI, and it's far bigger than text and images. He asked: "If you can understand worlds, is it possible that you understand proteins and chemicals that have structure?” This is the quiet revolution happening in AI right now. We're moving from an AI that understands human language to an AI that understands the language of nature itself. The "letters" are atoms. The "words" are molecules. The "sentences" are the complex structures of life, networks, and reality. The same foundational models that generate video are now being used to: *Decode proteins to fight disease *Design new materials at the atomic level *Simulate complex systems in quantum computing These were once the domain of supercomputers and Nobel laureates. Now, they're becoming solvable problems for a new generation of startups. AI is transitioning from a tool for communication to a tool for creation and discovery in the physical world. This is where the next wave of generational companies will be built. The "hard-to-solve" problems are now within reach.

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang just gave us a glimpse into the future of AI, and it's far bigger than text and images. He asked: "If you can understand worlds, is it possible that you understand proteins and chemicals that have structure?” This is the quiet revolution happening in AI right now. We're moving from an AI that understands human language to an AI that understands the language of nature itself. The "letters" are atoms. The "words" are molecules. The "sentences" are the complex structures of life, networks, and reality. The same foundational models that generate video are now being used to: Decode proteins to fight disease Design new materials at the atomic level *Simulate complex systems in quantum computing These were once the domain of supercomputers and Nobel laureates. Now, they're becoming solvable problems for a new generation of startups. AI is transitioning from a tool for communication to a tool for creation and discovery in the physical world. This is where the next wave of generational companies will be built. The "hard-to-solve" problems are now within reach.

Konstantine Buhler

13,014 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

What did Yale School of Medicine find in those who were injured after receiving the COVID injection??? It turns out that after you inject someone with a gene therapy whose job it is to turn the body into a manufacturing plant for a toxic, foreign viral protein...the body makes that protein...for a long time...up to 709 days. And when your body continuously makes a foreign protein that activates the immune system, the body enters a state of chronic immune activation that screws up the immune system such that it no longer correctly recognizes pathogens (or cancer cells), but instead produces antibodies that attack its own tissues. All of this is what one would predict. Those at the top who promoted and allowed this to happen are criminally responsible for this entirely predictable outcome. To learn how to get this crap out of your body, JOIN

What did Yale School of Medicine find in those who were injured after receiving the COVID injection??? It turns out that after you inject someone with a gene therapy whose job it is to turn the body into a manufacturing plant for a toxic, foreign viral protein...the body makes that protein...for a long time...up to 709 days. And when your body continuously makes a foreign protein that activates the immune system, the body enters a state of chronic immune activation that screws up the immune system such that it no longer correctly recognizes pathogens (or cancer cells), but instead produces antibodies that attack its own tissues. All of this is what one would predict. Those at the top who promoted and allowed this to happen are criminally responsible for this entirely predictable outcome. To learn how to get this crap out of your body, JOIN

Christina Parks

64,311 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

AI For The Poor, Human Intelligence For The Rich Western capitalists are selling AI to us as “the great equalizer”. But it is really not. What we are seeing is a new class system being built in real time. The rich will still pay for human teachers, human doctors, human consultants, human artists, and human care. Everyone else will be told that an AI version is good enough. When poor children are offered AI tutors instead of more teachers or working-class patients are pushed toward AI health tools instead of proper medical care, we should pay attention. AI may be useful, but it is also becoming a cheaper substitute for people who already have less. This is why African governments must be very careful about the AI policies they adopt. We cannot afford to copy and paste technology policies from the West without asking whose interests they serve. If we are not careful, AI will become another tool used to manage poverty instead of solving the systems that created it. Africans also need to be more critical of how AI is being introduced into education, healthcare, governance, welfare, and other public services. Who owns the technology? Who controls the data? Who profits from the contracts? Who is accountable when these systems fail? And most importantly, who is being asked to accept AI instead of real human care? Africa must not become a testing ground for Western-imposed systems that deepen inequality under the guise of innovation.

AI For The Poor, Human Intelligence For The Rich Western capitalists are selling AI to us as “the great equalizer”. But it is really not. What we are seeing is a new class system being built in real time. The rich will still pay for human teachers, human doctors, human consultants, human artists, and human care. Everyone else will be told that an AI version is good enough. When poor children are offered AI tutors instead of more teachers or working-class patients are pushed toward AI health tools instead of proper medical care, we should pay attention. AI may be useful, but it is also becoming a cheaper substitute for people who already have less. This is why African governments must be very careful about the AI policies they adopt. We cannot afford to copy and paste technology policies from the West without asking whose interests they serve. If we are not careful, AI will become another tool used to manage poverty instead of solving the systems that created it. Africans also need to be more critical of how AI is being introduced into education, healthcare, governance, welfare, and other public services. Who owns the technology? Who controls the data? Who profits from the contracts? Who is accountable when these systems fail? And most importantly, who is being asked to accept AI instead of real human care? Africa must not become a testing ground for Western-imposed systems that deepen inequality under the guise of innovation.

The Spearhead

68,786 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce

Around 1 billion computer-based jobs are at risk of being replaced by AI. This shift is happening whether people are ready for it or not. The real question isn’t if it happens. It’s who owns the value created by it. Right now, that value flows to a handful of billionaires and Big Tech companies. At Action Model, we believe AI should be owned by the people, not controlled by the few. There’s still a small window for people-owned AI to win. Now is your chance to do something about it.

Around 1 billion computer-based jobs are at risk of being replaced by AI. This shift is happening whether people are ready for it or not. The real question isn’t if it happens. It’s who owns the value created by it. Right now, that value flows to a handful of billionaires and Big Tech companies. At Action Model, we believe AI should be owned by the people, not controlled by the few. There’s still a small window for people-owned AI to win. Now is your chance to do something about it.

Action Model

22,014 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

We have advanced technology that we are rolling out to provide trust, privacy, and compliance in the age of AI. AI model providers need to be accountable, zkML is the solution for that.

We have advanced technology that we are rolling out to provide trust, privacy, and compliance in the age of AI. AI model providers need to be accountable, zkML is the solution for that.

Polyhedra

33,166 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Elon Musk: For the next few years, I think America is likely to win the artificial intelligence race. But that early lead is fragile and short-lived. Ultimately, the global victor will be decided by a single factor: it will be a function of who controls the AI chip fabrication. The factories that make the AI chips, who controls them? That is where the real power lies. If those facilities are controlled, if more of them are controlled by China, then China will win the future of AI. Right now, almost all the advanced AI chip factories, they call them fabs, are located in Taiwan. That immense concentration of manufacturing creates a massive vulnerability for the rest of the globe. If China invades Taiwan, what happens to the world? Well, if they were to invade in the near term, the entire world would essentially be cut off from advanced AI chips overnight. Everything would grind to a halt. Currently, one hundred percent of advanced AI chips are made in Taiwan. We are relying entirely on a single location for the critical hardware that will define the next era of human technology and military dominance. Bringing that manufacturing power back home and securing our own supply chain is absolutely essential for national security, and the harsh reality is that we are simply not doing enough to prepare.

Elon Musk: For the next few years, I think America is likely to win the artificial intelligence race. But that early lead is fragile and short-lived. Ultimately, the global victor will be decided by a single factor: it will be a function of who controls the AI chip fabrication. The factories that make the AI chips, who controls them? That is where the real power lies. If those facilities are controlled, if more of them are controlled by China, then China will win the future of AI. Right now, almost all the advanced AI chip factories, they call them fabs, are located in Taiwan. That immense concentration of manufacturing creates a massive vulnerability for the rest of the globe. If China invades Taiwan, what happens to the world? Well, if they were to invade in the near term, the entire world would essentially be cut off from advanced AI chips overnight. Everything would grind to a halt. Currently, one hundred percent of advanced AI chips are made in Taiwan. We are relying entirely on a single location for the critical hardware that will define the next era of human technology and military dominance. Bringing that manufacturing power back home and securing our own supply chain is absolutely essential for national security, and the harsh reality is that we are simply not doing enough to prepare.

Ian Miles Cheong

408,156 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Christianity is a National Security Threat: "We have a Bible mandate to be a comfort to the Jewish people because they have been through the hell of the Holocaust" "God has never called the Gentile people in the Old Testament his people. These are the Jewish people" "We are doing what we are doing in order to ensure that America continues to survive and thrive because the Bible says, "I will bless those who bless you, Israel. I will curse those who curse you, Israel." "History has shown us that both biblical and otherwise. And whether we like it or not, the modern state of Israel is proof positive that the Bible is true and that God is real." "And that is why we do what we do. If the nation of is Israel ceased to exist, then the Bible is a lie. And so we are not lobbying for a foreign nation. We are exercising what we believe is our biblical mandate to do what we can to bless the nation of Israel and its people"

Christianity is a National Security Threat: "We have a Bible mandate to be a comfort to the Jewish people because they have been through the hell of the Holocaust" "God has never called the Gentile people in the Old Testament his people. These are the Jewish people" "We are doing what we are doing in order to ensure that America continues to survive and thrive because the Bible says, "I will bless those who bless you, Israel. I will curse those who curse you, Israel." "History has shown us that both biblical and otherwise. And whether we like it or not, the modern state of Israel is proof positive that the Bible is true and that God is real." "And that is why we do what we do. If the nation of is Israel ceased to exist, then the Bible is a lie. And so we are not lobbying for a foreign nation. We are exercising what we believe is our biblical mandate to do what we can to bless the nation of Israel and its people"

Seethroughitall

23,627 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

The traditional explanation for autoimmune disease is being fundamentally questioned. The idea that the body suddenly attacks itself for no reason is a flawed narrative. The conditions—Crohn's, Sjogren's, Hashimoto's—are real, but the "autoimmune" label may be a medical dead end. By definition, these are idiopathic diseases, meaning their origin is unknown. If we don't know the cause, how can we be certain of the mechanism? This is not a denial of suffering, but a critique of a label that offers management instead of cure. The fact that people can and do heal from these conditions proves the problem isn't an irreversibly broken immune system. The body isn't attacking itself; it's responding to a root cause we have yet to identify. Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome share the same story: "No known cause, no known cure." It's time we applied the same critical thinking to the entire autoimmune category. True healing begins when we stop blaming the body and start looking for the trigger.

The traditional explanation for autoimmune disease is being fundamentally questioned. The idea that the body suddenly attacks itself for no reason is a flawed narrative. The conditions—Crohn's, Sjogren's, Hashimoto's—are real, but the "autoimmune" label may be a medical dead end. By definition, these are idiopathic diseases, meaning their origin is unknown. If we don't know the cause, how can we be certain of the mechanism? This is not a denial of suffering, but a critique of a label that offers management instead of cure. The fact that people can and do heal from these conditions proves the problem isn't an irreversibly broken immune system. The body isn't attacking itself; it's responding to a root cause we have yet to identify. Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome share the same story: "No known cause, no known cure." It's time we applied the same critical thinking to the entire autoimmune category. True healing begins when we stop blaming the body and start looking for the trigger.

Camus

52,532 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

We are incredibly excited to announce River AI. Our mission is to create personal AI that is owned and shaped by you. Today’s best AIs are controlled by a few large corporations. We are building the alternative: a new, personal stack for AI that works entirely for you, shares your values, and operates on your terms.

We are incredibly excited to announce River AI. Our mission is to create personal AI that is owned and shaped by you. Today’s best AIs are controlled by a few large corporations. We are building the alternative: a new, personal stack for AI that works entirely for you, shares your values, and operates on your terms.

River AI

765,892 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 "If you saw vaccine ingredients on a food label, it would be the most toxic item in the grocery store." Dr. Ben Tapper says he defers to the Supreme Court in 2011: all vaccines are unavoidably unsafe. Yet we are told, over and over, that they are "safe and effective." Dr. Tapper calls that exactly what it is: a bumper sticker slogan designed to make people stop asking questions. The science is not settled. And here's why it matters: The CDC and ACIP claim it takes two weeks to create antibodies to a vaccine. But we know inflammation is part of the antibody process. Multiple antibody responses are already firing in that first two weeks, before the titer they're looking for is even triggered. The immune system is already being disrupted in ways they aren't measuring and aren't telling you about. Dr. Tapper believes these vaccines are a fundamental violation of how God designed the immune system. They bypass the skin barrier, your body's first line of defense, and introduce foreign ingredients directly into the body. Those ingredients. Look them up. Every single one. If they appeared on a food label, no person alive would put that item in their cart. It would never be approved for store shelves. So why is it approved for a newborn? That is the question nobody in the mainstream wants to answer.

🚨 "If you saw vaccine ingredients on a food label, it would be the most toxic item in the grocery store." Dr. Ben Tapper says he defers to the Supreme Court in 2011: all vaccines are unavoidably unsafe. Yet we are told, over and over, that they are "safe and effective." Dr. Tapper calls that exactly what it is: a bumper sticker slogan designed to make people stop asking questions. The science is not settled. And here's why it matters: The CDC and ACIP claim it takes two weeks to create antibodies to a vaccine. But we know inflammation is part of the antibody process. Multiple antibody responses are already firing in that first two weeks, before the titer they're looking for is even triggered. The immune system is already being disrupted in ways they aren't measuring and aren't telling you about. Dr. Tapper believes these vaccines are a fundamental violation of how God designed the immune system. They bypass the skin barrier, your body's first line of defense, and introduce foreign ingredients directly into the body. Those ingredients. Look them up. Every single one. If they appeared on a food label, no person alive would put that item in their cart. It would never be approved for store shelves. So why is it approved for a newborn? That is the question nobody in the mainstream wants to answer.

The HighWire

17,353 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

No medical school in the world is teaching this. So no matter how many degrees they have or how smart they think they are, every doctor in the conventional system starts from the same false premise: that you are a bag of illness, that your life is always at risk, and that they are the ones keeping you alive. That is not the truth about the human body. God has been choreographing a delicate dance since the dawn of man. There are millions of bacteria and viruses on your hands right now as you sit there. Millions. And in all of human history, not one of them has risen up and wiped us out. Not one. Because the body knows what it is doing. And yet somehow we decided we were smart enough to eliminate 17 of those viruses from existence, and while we were at it we would inject aluminum, mercury, polysorbate 80, fatty lipids, mRNA, and God knows what else directly into the bloodstreams of our children. And we would wear masks. And we would do all of this on the advice of the most educated people in the room. Who told you that you needed any of this? The same people who never once stopped to ask whether the most sophisticated biological system ever created might already know something they don't.

No medical school in the world is teaching this. So no matter how many degrees they have or how smart they think they are, every doctor in the conventional system starts from the same false premise: that you are a bag of illness, that your life is always at risk, and that they are the ones keeping you alive. That is not the truth about the human body. God has been choreographing a delicate dance since the dawn of man. There are millions of bacteria and viruses on your hands right now as you sit there. Millions. And in all of human history, not one of them has risen up and wiped us out. Not one. Because the body knows what it is doing. And yet somehow we decided we were smart enough to eliminate 17 of those viruses from existence, and while we were at it we would inject aluminum, mercury, polysorbate 80, fatty lipids, mRNA, and God knows what else directly into the bloodstreams of our children. And we would wear masks. And we would do all of this on the advice of the most educated people in the room. Who told you that you needed any of this? The same people who never once stopped to ask whether the most sophisticated biological system ever created might already know something they don't.

Del Bigtree

107,320 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce