Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Why securing AI is harder than anyone expected and the approaching AI security crisis with Sander Schulhoff Sander is a leading researcher in the field of adversarial robustness, which is the art and science of getting AI systems to do things they shouldn't do, through jail-breaking and prompt injection....

61,414 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Inside Every 📧: The AI-native startup with 5 products, 7-figure revenue, and 100% AI-written code With just 15 people, Every 📧 publishes a daily AI newsletter, ships AI products, and operates a million-dollar-a-year consulting arm—all while their engineers write virtually zero code. It’s the most radical example of an AI-first company, and Dan Shipper 📧 (CEO) is a prolific writer who has become a leading voice on how AI is transforming the way we live and work. In this conversation, we discuss: 🔸 Why every company needs an “AI operations lead” 🔸 The most underrated AI tool for non-programmers 🔸 Why Dan thinks AI will reshore jobs to the U.S. 🔸 An inside look at Every’s AI-first workflow 🔸 How Dan’s team uses an arsenal of AI agents (Claude, Codex, “Friday,” “Charlie”) in parallel, treating each AI like a specialist with unique strengths 🔸 Why generalists will thrive in an AI-first world, as rigid job titles blur and everyone becomes a “manager” of AI tools 🔸 Dan’s playbook for making any company AI-first—from the CEO setting the example, to hosting internal prompt-sharing sessions, to upskilling teams on AI tools 🔸 Much more Listen now 👇 • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Thank you to our wonderful sponsors for supporting the podcast: 🏆 CodeRabbit—Cut code review time and bugs in half. Instantly: 🏆 DX—A platform for measuring and improving developer productivity: 🏆 PostHog—How developers build successful products:

Lenny Rachitsky

314,081 views • 11 months ago

Dr. Fei-Fei Li (Fei-Fei Li) is known as the “godmother of AI.” For the past two decades, she’s been at the center of AI’s most significant breakthroughs, including: - Spearheading ImageNet, the dataset that sparked the AI explosion we’re living through right now. - Leading work at Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (SAIL) - Serving as Chief Scientist of AI/ML at Google Cloud - Co-founding Stanford’s Institute for Human-Centered AI - Serving on the United Nations AI Scientific Advisory Board - Being named as Time's 100 most influential people in AI In this conversation, Fei-Fei shares the rarely told history of how we got to today—and what comes next. We discuss: 🔸 The backstory on ImageNet 🔸 Why robotics faces unique challenges compared with language models and what’s needed to overcome them 🔸 Why Fei-Fei believes AI won’t replace humans but will require us to take responsibility for ourselves 🔸 Why world models and spatial intelligence represent the next frontier in AI, beyond large language models 🔸 The surprising applications of Marble, from movie production to psychological research 🔸 How to participate in AI regardless of your role 🔸 Much more Listen now 👇 • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Thank you to our wonderful sponsors for supporting the podcast: 🏆 Figma Make — A prompt-to-code tool for making ideas real: 🏆 Justworks — The all-in-one HR solution for managing your small business with confidence: 🏆 Sinch — Build messaging, email, and calling into your product:

Lenny Rachitsky

250,455 views • 7 months ago

Microsoft CPO Aparna Chennapragada brought the 🔥 What you'll learn: 🔸 Why prompt sets are the new PRDs 🔸 Why the PM role isn’t dying in the AI era—it's actually becoming more important 🔸 How Aparna's teams live “one year in the future" 🔸 Why NLX (natural language experience) is the new UX 🔸 Why she believes Microsoft let other companies get so far ahead in the AI coding market 🔸 The three characteristics of AI agents: autonomy (delegation of tasks), complexity (handling multi-step challenges), and natural interaction (conversing beyond simple chat) 🔸 How to balance cutting-edge AI adoption with appropriate governance through dual-track approaches 🔸 Leadership differences between Microsoft’s Satya Nadella (known for multi-level thinking and early trendspotting) and Google’s Sundar Pichai (mastery of complex ecosystems) 🔸 A practical framework for evaluating zero-to-one product opportunities 🔸 Much more Listen now 👇 • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Aparna is CPO of AI at Work Microsoft, where she oversees AI product strategy for their productivity tools and their work on agents. Previously, she was the CPO at Robin Hood, spent 12 years at Google, and is also on the board of eBay and Capital One. Thank you to our wonderful sponsors for supporting the podcast: 🏆 @Get_Eppo — Run reliable, impactful experiments: 🏆 Pragmatic Institute (formerly Pragmatic Marketing) — Industry‑recognized product, marketing, and AI training and certifications: 🏆 Coda — The all-in-one collaborative workspace:

Lenny Rachitsky

104,583 views • 1 year ago

I was honored to share the TED AI stage with Ilya on Oct. 17. His speech video is out today (mine's still being edited). I think it provides relevant context tokens to the ongoing events. Transcript starting at ~10'20": As AI continues to progress, as technology advances, [...] What I claim will happen is that people will start to act in unprecedentedly collaborative ways out of their own self-interest. It's already happening right now. You see the leading AGI companies starting to collaborate, such as the Frontiers model forum. And we will expect that companies, even competitors, will share technical information to make their AI safe. We may even see governments do this. As another example, at OpenAI, we really believed in how dramatic AGI is going to be. So, one of the ideas that we were operating by, and it's been written on our website for 5 years now, is that when technology gets such that we are very close to AGI, to computers smarter than humans, if some other company is far ahead of us, then rather than compete with them, we will help them out, join them, in a sense. And why do that? Because we appreciate how incredibly dramatic AGI is going to be. And my claim is that with each generation of capability advancements, as AI gets better and as all of you experience what AI can do, as people who run AI efforts and AGI efforts, and people who work on them will experience it as well, this will change the way we see AI and AGI. And that will change collective behavior. And this is an important reason why I'm hopeful that, despite the great challenges posed by this technology, we will overcome them. @TEDAI2023

Jim Fan

846,450 views • 2 years ago

David Friedberg: The AI Jobs Panic Is a Crock of Sh*t Why? The revenue potential outweighs the cost savings by 100x. “There is no job loss with AI. I've said it a thousand times, and I will say it again, and again, and again. What I see on the ground, and what I've seen at dozens of companies, including my company that I run, there are two sides to a business. There is revenue and there’s costs. On the cost side of the equation, AI can be used to reduce humans doing things that cost money, to some extent. The effect there, I would argue, is nominal. The real opportunity with AI is on the revenue side, where suddenly one engineer can do 100x or 1000x what they used to be able to do, meaning you can make more products at your company, whether those are agricultural seed products, or boats and ships, or software for companies, or clothing, or what have you. Because of AI, everyone has the ability to expand their revenue base to create more products, and that is the foundation of good economic prosperity. It is called productivity. We can grow productivity in this country with AI. So where I see AI being used is on the revenue side 100x more than the cost side. And in that equation, people are hiring like crazy. We cannot hire enough people. I just had a review meeting with my product and engineering team two days ago, and they're like, ‘We want to add an extra 15 headcount to our engineering squads because we have all this opportunity to do stuff that we couldn't otherwise do.’ So we are going to hire more people. And to Sacks' point, we are seeing that show up in the jobs numbers. The idea that AI is going to destroy jobs is a Luddite idea that is being disproven every single day, and I see it on the ground. It is only a matter of time before people wake up to this and they realize that this narrative that they've all been sold is a crock of sh*t.”

The All-In Podcast

151,462 views • 19 days ago