Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

✨ The problem with US foreign aid ✨ My co-founder Faisal Saeed Al Mutar gave this TED Talks a month before the election last year, shedding light on why traditional aid just seems to disappear into an abyss without results to show for it and how to reform it....

19,443 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Faisal Saeed Al Mutar
Faisal Saeed Al Mutarvor 1 Jahr

@TEDTalks Thank you for posting! Here is our website:

Profilbild von Rarely Tolerable.
Rarely Tolerable.vor 1 Jahr

Do you support President Trump's 90 day pause and assesment of all foreign aid?

Profilbild von Andrew Gold
Andrew Goldvor 1 Jahr

@faisalalmutar @TEDTalks Such a lovely and intelligent man!

Profilbild von James Morrisroe
James Morrisroevor 1 Jahr

@faisalalmutar @TEDTalks I love this!

Profilbild von Nate B
Nate Bvor 1 Jahr

@faisalalmutar @TEDTalks DJ Grothe needs to watch this.

Profilbild von David Patrick🇺🇲
David Patrick🇺🇲vor 1 Jahr

@faisalalmutar @TEDTalks What a great presentation

Profilbild von Manuel Ramcanny
Manuel Ramcannyvor 1 Jahr

@faisalalmutar @TEDTalks Just give this lady a seat in the cabinet already.

Profilbild von Will Brewer
Will Brewervor 1 Jahr

@faisalalmutar @TEDTalks What was the last non-fiction book you read from the 1880s? Do you know who Henry Dunant was? How about Clara Barton?

Profilbild von Kyle
Kylevor 1 Jahr

@Theo_TJ_Jordan @faisalalmutar @TEDTalks Because it was mostly a front to mask Intel operations and buy loyalty

Profilbild von 2ndHarvest
2ndHarvestvor 1 Jahr

@faisalalmutar @TEDTalks I hope US tax dollars are not going to teaching people Turkish.

Ähnliche Videos

FACTS INDICATES THAT ABOVE 76% VISIONARY AFRICANS,NEEDS MORE LEADERS LIKE H.E KAGAME! 🔑Globally, Africa is the biggest foreign aid recipient. Every year, billions of dollars are sent in as foreign aid and development assistance to Africa , Why Africa ? 🔑The Aid Dependency Syndrome is almost to its last days in Africa! Standing Brave Africans like President Kagame of Rwanda are on it ! 🛟The aid we are introduced to , accounts for creating dependency on aid instead of fostering local economic growth, distorting market mechanisms, undermining local businesses, causing inflation, contributing to political instability. 🛟Do you know that ; Most of the times, aid is directed towards projects that benefit the donor country more than the recipient, such as tying aid to purchasing goods from the donor nation. 🛟Most of foreign aid do not address the root causes of the crisis, do you know why ? That’s the password! 🛟Donors do not want to adopt aid delivery mechanisms that promote ownership, transparency and stakeholders participation in development process , a big concern hidden from our sight! ✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿 To overcome foreign aid dependency, I think Africas , can focus on 🛃Investing in sectors like manufacturing, technology, and services, creating a broader economic base and reducing vulnerability to price fluctuations in raw materials. 🛃Implement efficient tax systems to maximize domestic revenue collection, reducing dependence on foreign aid. 🛃Implement transparent and accountable governance practices to attract investment, build trust with donors, and effectively utilize aid funds. 🛃Invest in education and healthcare to build a skilled workforce capable of driving innovation and economic growth. 🛃Promote intra-African trade by strengthening regional economic blocs, creating a larger market for African goods and services. 🛃So many not to mention Fellow Africans wake up ! ✊🏿

JULIUS MUGABO

40,067 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Secretary of State Marco Rubio exploded as ABC anchor George Stephanopoulos pressed him on his denial that people had died as a result of U.S. aid cuts. During the Tuedsay morning interview on Good Morning America Rubio painted the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), shuttered by Elon Musk’s DOGE initiative this year, as having been bloated and corrupt. We shut down U.S. aid because it was a dysfunctional organization,” Rubio began. “We moved it under the State Department,” he said. “We are going to do more foreign aid than any country in the world… but we’re going to do it the right way.” “That’s all in the future, but are you standing by that comment you’re saying that no one died because of the aid cuts are all those aid organizations?” Stephanopoulos asked. “That’s ridiculous,” Rubio snapped back. Rubio continued: “Well first of all, well then they died because England didn’t give enough money or Canada didn’t give more or China did. Let’s blame the other countries that don’t do any foreign aid. How about China? I mean China’s the second largest economy in the world. They don’t give money to these projects.” “I think anybody who tells you that somehow it’s the United States, if we cut a dollar, somehow we’re responsible for some horrific thing that’s going on in the world, it’s just not true,” Rubio replied. The secretary of state pivoted to blame corruption and “gangs” in the countries receiving aid. Rubio continued: “One of the reasons why some of the places didn’t get the aid is not because we cut the aid. It’s because there’s a war going on and the aid never got to the people. So in Sudan, for example, it’s not just a humanitarian catastrophe, it is a war zone. Okay, the aid is stolen, the aid is impeded, in fact they use aid as a tool against the people, and so blocking aid is a tool and an arm of war. So in some of these places, the reason why the aid isn’t getting there is it can’t be distributed.” He added: “Look at Haiti, one of the reasons why aid can’t be distributed in Haiti, is you can send all the aid in the world you want, it gets hijacked and stolen by criminal gangs that control the country. And so they’re the ones to blame for whatever is happening there, not us who provided more aid than anybody else.” Returning to his original question: “Stephanopoulos again replied, “Well let me just say one more time, are you standing by your contention that no one has died?” “No one has died because the United States has cut aid,” Rubio clapped back. “No, people have died because gangs steal the aid. People have died because the distributors of aid have not done well. People have died because other countries haven’t stepped up, but the United States has saved more lives and continues to save more lives than any other country in the world.” He concluded: “And we’re gonna continue to do it, but we’re going to do the right way and in a responsible way. We’re not going to continue to pour billions of dollars out the door of American taxpayer funds for programs that don’t work and in some cases were flat out corrupt.” Who loves Marco Rubio as Secretary of State? I do! 👍🏻

Victoria 🇺🇸⏳🗽🚔

73,432 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Mike Cuckabee is repeating the same lie he told Tucker Carlson during his interview: "Israel spends its US military aid in the US, supporting the US economy." This lie has become the default rebuttal to anyone who challenges the rationale behind US military aid to Israel. Under the current Memorandum of Understanding, Israel is required to spend a gradually increasing amount of US aid inside of the US, while gradually decreasing the amount of aid it spends with its own defense industry in Israel. In other words, every year, "off-shore procurement" (OSP) must be reduced until the entirety of the US aid is spent within the US. The problem is, Israeli defense contractors have opened up subsidiaries in the US, so they're technically no longer considered "off-shore." So, Israel can theoretically spend all $3.8B in aid it receives every year with its own defense contractors in the US. These Israeli defense contractors may employ some American workers in non-sensitive roles, but the parent companies in Israel are still benefiting through the profit and expertise of their American operations. Some of the Israeli defense contractors who have set up subsidiaries in the US include Elbit Systems, IAI North America, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, XTEND, etc. Further, Israel is one of only a few countries that is allowed to use its aid to contract directly with US-based defense contractors, instead of being forced to use the Pentagon as a middleman to buy its weapons. This process is called Direct Commercial Sales (as opposed to Foreign Military Sales) which decreases the transparency in how Israel is spending its aid money since these transactions usually have confidentiality agreements. Having said all of this, Israel does spend some of its aid money with US defense contractors. For example, it used its aid grants to purchase the F-35 from Lockheed Martin. But, what 99% of the American public doesn't know is that the contracts for these purchases have offset agreements that force Lcokheed Martin to buy billions of dollars worth of parts, systems, and services from Israeli defense contractors which "offsets" the cost of Israel's purchases from US contractors by generating money for its own defense industry. Incidentally, the offset mechanism is a good proxy for how the new provision in the 2027 NDAA will work, essentially creating a dependency on the Israeli defense industry for the US military. Even though Israel would no longer receive aid, they would be jointly developing technology with the US, similar to what Raytheon and Rafael did with the Iron Dome. The irony of this is that after the Iron Dome was completed, Israel refused to give the US the software source code for it, so it couldn't be integrated into the US defense network. Solid partner, right? Also, in light of the shortage of rare earths within the US defense industry due to China tightening its export controls, it seems absurd that the US wants to increase its dependency on another foreign country for its own national security. In reality, the NDAA provision is just a way for Jews to hide Israel's parasitical relationship with the US since the US will continue to keep billions of dollars of weapons stockpiles in its WRSA-I weapons depot in Israel, which the Israelis can use if needed. This weapon reserve is funded by American taxpayers but is not counted as aid to Israel despite the fact that Israel uses it. And of course, Congress will pass any emergency aid appropriations if Israel needs additional military aid, just like Congress did after Israel depleted its stockpiles of bombs on Palestinian women and children. To sum up, Israel spends a significant portion of its US aid on its own contractors located in the US, and even when it does spend US aid on US contractors, they use offsets to force those contractors to buy parts from Israeli contractors. Israel is a parasite and Mike Cuckabee is aiding and abetting the fleecing of America.

Curse

13,343 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

From July 2024: Nick Fuentes makes the case for sending foreign aid to Israel. -- TRANSCRIPT The president's policy is, let's make Israel independent from the United States. That's not good for the United States. And this is gonna sound, like, you know, counterintuitive, but you know, you could look it up. Last summer, all the Jews got—this sounds dumb the way I'm saying it—but look up Tablet Magazine. It's a Jewish paper. In July 2023, they did a symposium on foreign aid to Israel. And so, all of their contributors wrote, you know, for or against, whether we should get rid of it or not get rid of it. And—the guy's name is Siegel, he's, like, a prominent neocon, his dad's a big neocon, and they're connected to everybody. And the main article says, "We need to get rid of foreign aid to Israel," but not for the reason that you'd think. You know, we all thought we were based for being against foreign to aid to Israel, and for obvious reasons—"We need to spend the tax dollars here!"—True! But what Siegel—I think his name's Jacob Siegel; his dad's Fred Siegel—What Jacob Siegel argues is, no, we need to rid of foreign aid to Israel because it's acting as golden handcuffs. They're saying that as America, as the left becomes more anti-Israel—and the left is hegemonic—the United States will use the aid that they give to Israel to leverage Israel and restrain Israel. He said, "So, we need to get rid of the foreign aid so we can be completely independent. And we can do whatever we want. And the United States can't control us." So, the most militant Zionists are now actually arguing against the foreign aid. And that's why, by the way, you know, when Matt Walsh at Daily Wire says "We shouldn't send foreign to Israel," and Jeremy Boreing and Ben Shapiro say, "Oh, well, you know, you don't get fired for—" And Shapiro and Boreing say "Oh, see, we allow a rebuttal. We allow the different opinion on our show." Yeah, that's because that actually helps them. They don't want the foreign aid because they—some of these so-called revisionist Zionists, Jewish maximalists—they want to get rid of the foreign aid so they have the freedom of action. And JD Vance, looking to him—he runs a hedge fund, he was with Peter Thiel, the guy's like a Straussian—JD Vance says: We need to arm Israel so they can conduct an independent foreign policy. We need to arm them so that they can confront Iran. So like, this is the policy. And the policy is to make Israel independent of us. But, you know, we want these countries—It's actually ironically America First to make these countries dependent on us.

Max 📟

13,612 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

The Bizarre Gymnastics Of The Gaza Aid Pier So let me get this straight. The US wound up building its "floating pier" a few miles off the coast of Gaza to deliver humanitarian aid, but nobody will be able to ship the aid directly to the pier to get it to Gaza. Instead, the aid will be delivered to Cyprus via air or sea, and then from Cyprus the aid will be shipped 200 miles to the pier. From there the pallets of aid will be loaded onto smaller US army boats, which will then carry the aid from the pier to a long causeway on Gaza's actual coast. Those pallets will then be carried from the boats to the shore via the causeway - possibly by British troops or possibly by Israeli troops depending on what source you're reading - and taken into Gaza by IDF troops after careful examination and approval of their contents. All to deliver some 90 to 150 truckloads worth of aid per day, which is far short of the 500 truckloads the UN says Gaza needs. And this is all being done because Israel isn't simply letting people drive an adequate amount of aid through the custom-built gates directly into Gaza. Since Washington doesn't want to exert any pressure on Israel to allow such a self-evident move, this immensely complicated and expensive dance is being performed to deliver a pathetically inadequate amount of aid instead. Aid that is only necessary because Israel has been destroying Gaza in its genocidal bombing campaign which it has been carrying out with total impunity. Cool. Very normal and cool. Reading by Tim Foley.

Caitlin Johnstone

130,005 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren