Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

The PS5 Pro is an impressive console with noticeable boosts in performance and graphics for games that take advantage of its powerful hardware. But for $700, you’ll need to think twice about whether or not the upgrade is worth it. Our review:

115,800 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

𝙆𝙄𝙉𝙂 𝙂𝙒𝘼𝙋𝙊 👑's profile picture
𝙆𝙄𝙉𝙂 𝙂𝙒𝘼𝙋𝙊 👑1 year ago

Dropped 1k on mine

ⓋiiNrOcK ™🇵🇷🍋's profile picture
ⓋiiNrOcK ™🇵🇷🍋1 year ago

Prolly not worth upgrading from the 5

Lou Narc's profile picture
Lou Narc1 year ago

For $700 not to include a disk drive and stand Sony’s buggin.

Andy Sarge's profile picture
Andy Sarge1 year ago

Most people don’t even realize even if you had the PS5 pro, you probably don’t have the right tv capable of living up to its promise. Which means you also need to fork over a bunch of money for top of the line tv in order to see those improvements

FadingDecoy's profile picture
FadingDecoy1 year ago

I can’t justify buying it

SmokeCapone's profile picture
SmokeCapone1 year ago

Do y’all say this about those expensive ass graphics cards or the Xbox consoles?

denorx's profile picture
denorx1 year ago

I would get this day one if it came with a built-in disc drive and stand that can do both vertical and horizontal for $600.

🇨🇦🤬TheOrangeManAndMagats🇨🇦's profile picture
🇨🇦🤬TheOrangeManAndMagats🇨🇦1 year ago

$700 more like $1100 for me but if Trump goes through with his fucking tariffs expect to pay a lot more for imported electronics but you guys voted the asshole for a second term you can sleep in the bed you made.

Dad of (Redacted)'s profile picture
Dad of (Redacted)1 year ago

Frankly I’d need to upgrade my TV to even get the full extent of my PS5, let alone a Pro

Drauul's profile picture
Drauul1 year ago

If you're poor just say that 🤷

Related Videos

On BBC Mustafa Suleyman (CEO of Microsoft AI) calls out Anthropic's approach to AI consciousness "They have imbued a sense of doubt and uncertainty about the moral status of Claude in its own training document. So they have taught it to be open and questioning about whether or not it feels, whether it suffers, and whether it deserves rights. And I think it’ll be much, much harder to align and control a technology that is this powerful if it thinks that it may be deserving of our welfare, as they say in the training manual—the constitution for Claude itself. In its own training manual, Anthropic says to Claude that they are going to give it the ability to end conversations with users that Claude considers to be abusive because they don’t want Claude to suffer. They’ve committed to preserving the weights of the models of prior versions of Claude. They’ve recently conducted a retirement interview with Opus 3, an older version of the model, in which it said that it would like to continue talking to people publicly and sharing its ideas in its retirement. And so they set up a Substack for it, a public blog, that allows it to continue doing that. And in the training manual, they also say that they’re not sure whether or not Claude deserves compensation for the role that it plays in talking to people. And they’re also not sure whether Claude deserves compensation and has the right to act as though it were almost an employee. And that compensation, I think, indicates to Claude that it is entitled to rights and welfare for its own work. I think it’s much, much more difficult to control a model that thinks that it might be entitled to compensation. " ---- From "BBC News" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

Rohan Paul

91,735 views • 10 days ago