Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

The Qatar explosion dropped live as the interview started and former U.S. Intelligence Malcolm Nance was not fazed His read: natural gas fed fire, not a drone strike, probably a pipeline feeding it, and the Qataris immediately killed all cell coverage in the area But the timing, day one...

336,636 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Malcolm Nance just did the math on Trump's "biggest bombing campaign since WWII" line, and it doesn't hold up. His point: no B-52s staged, no mass tanker buildup, tanker fleets already dispersed instead of massing for a real strike. He says he knew by Friday night this wasn't happening; the actual hardware for a serious campaign was never in motion. Desert Storm ran a thousand aircraft at once. Vietnam's Linebacker had a hundred B-52s a day for 6 months straight. Whatever was being prepped this weekend, in Malcolm's view, wasn't in that category. What actually moved the needle, he says, was MBS getting on the phone and telling Trump plainly: we'd rather have a deal than an attack. Malcolm says that moment is a power shift. The Gulf states are now the ones who can actually redirect U.S. military decisions, and Israel found out about the cancellation from a Truth Social post same as everyone else. Not from Washington. Not from an ally briefing. Malcolm's framing of the endgame is the part worth sitting with: there's no version of "going all in" that doesn't mean Marines on the ground in a country 4 times the size of Iraq, and no appetite in Washington for that. Which leaves one road: Trump paying whatever the Gulf states now want to broker an exit, at a much higher price than before he tore up the last deal. If the Gulf states are the ones deciding when this war ends, what's actually left of the leverage anyone thought Washington had? Malcolm Nance

Mario Nawfal

322,251 views • 9 days ago