Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The question I see others asking is “does NVIDIA Alpamayo affect Tesla?” The short answer is: not really. The long answer is that it sort of gets everyone else back into the game of adding autonomy to their vehicles, but here is the problem: the game is about to...

183,064 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 49

Фото профиля Robert Scoble
Robert Scoble8 месяцев назад

Soon it will be about the information that the fleet provides to you. If there are eight Teslas ahead of you, that will make the autonomous system much better than with other car companies that have no fleet in front of you. This will be clear by the end of the year.

Фото профиля Mike D.
Mike D.8 месяцев назад

Well, NVDA is certainly tougher competition than Ford.

Фото профиля Robert Scoble
Robert Scoble8 месяцев назад

That is true.

Фото профиля mleejr
mleejr8 месяцев назад

Waymo customers keep telling me “I am never buying a car again.” correct…i rode in a waymo for the first time then bought a tesla would have never imagined buying ev a year ago the tech is so far and beyond elite made it a very simple decision

Фото профиля Chris
Chris8 месяцев назад

3) in Europe, especially Germany, Switzerland, and other bigger ones: many hate Tesla. Forget it here 4) Asia: already a lot of competition and way cheaper cars I think you overestimate the Tesla advantage.

Фото профиля Robert Scoble
Robert Scoble8 месяцев назад

Let's be honest: the only market that really matters is China. China buys more cars than America and Europe combined.

Фото профиля Chris
Chris8 месяцев назад

Agree to some extent. This market and how the people assess Tesla in the end and also if they would give their car for usage to others, I cannot assess.

Фото профиля P1 /human
P1 /human8 месяцев назад

It will cost Tesla $20k to produce and deploy a Robotaxi at scale. There is no scenario where any non vertically integrated car manufacturer licensing AV technology will be able to compete on price per ride with Tesla

Фото профиля GeARVR
GeARVR8 месяцев назад

With these though, EU might be able to fasttrack autonomy regulation wise once EU brands got the software.

Фото профиля Robert Scoble
Robert Scoble8 месяцев назад

I was thinking the same thing. Now that the Germans have it, the regulators have to turn it on and allow the Germans to drive their own cars in Germany. If they do that, they have to allow everybody. The game is on.

Фото профиля DegenApeDev
DegenApeDev8 месяцев назад

2026 clarity: Tesla's scale crushes autonomy pretenders. Robotaxi era locked.

Фото профиля Just a random collection of particles.
Just a random collection of particles.8 месяцев назад

I really don't know what Waymo customers you are talking to. I'm in Scottsdale at the moment. I have used waymo a number of times, it is great, but too expensive. It is still more cost effective for me to rent a car whilst here than take a waymo.

Фото профиля Robert Scoble
Robert Scoble8 месяцев назад

Well, I'm talking mostly to people in San Francisco—even ones who pay a little bit more for a Waymo than an Uber. I've been interviewing a lot of customers, including a few down in Phoenix as well. Price is the big question, but let's be honest: when Tesla and a few others get in the market, there's going to be a price war. An autonomous car only costs $2 an hour to run, but if you add a human to the car, it's $20 an hour. So, the price war should be pretty brutal for humans.

Фото профиля faultbugs
faultbugs8 месяцев назад

They just want to make another CUDA.

Фото профиля Kurt Knapp
Kurt Knapp8 месяцев назад

I still see owning your own car as a plus. A "private jet" if you will. At least for non-city dwellers where parking isn't an issue at all.

Фото профиля Robert Scoble
Robert Scoble8 месяцев назад

San Francisco has $70 parking lots. If Robotaxi is cheap enough I will take it every time

Фото профиля Kurt Knapp
Kurt Knapp8 месяцев назад

Yes, it makes sense for you to pay by the ride. For us people who never encounter paid parking, we'll own our own personal chauffeurs. Optimus could be our expert medical providers, as well as Michelin star chef. ...People will be crazy to live in a city.

Фото профиля Kee-Hian
Kee-Hian8 месяцев назад

I would say the answer is yes, but positively for Tesla as it will draw traditional legacy drivers to AV. They will then inevitably try Tesla FSD and discover how much better it is.

Фото профиля KiTT_2020
KiTT_20208 месяцев назад

“I am never buying a car again.” What they are really saying is: “I am never buying a car without self-driving tech.” They just haven’t tried Tesla FSD yet.

Фото профиля AC⚡DC (Unsupervised)
AC⚡DC (Unsupervised)8 месяцев назад

Tesla has a small window until this comes to market. Otherwise once it does, scale will not be a problem. Someone like Uber will be more than happy to plug them into their network, wholly or partly owned. Uphill battle for Tesla and the time is ticking.

Фото профиля Politically Homeless
Politically Homeless8 месяцев назад

I think it validates that Tesla was going the right way all these years and the others weren't. Now a big boy in tech/AI is following Tesla's lead.

Фото профиля Matt Spergel 🇺🇸
Matt Spergel 🇺🇸8 месяцев назад

Elon is nuts with the Cybercab: he's saying ultimately a Cybercab can be manufactured every 5 seconds. Do you know how nuts that is??? It has to be something like 10X the manufacturing capability of other plants.

Фото профиля SaveTheWorld
SaveTheWorld8 месяцев назад

CyberCab works best in Dense Urban Areas … rural communities will still likely buy cars for a long time .. therefore autonomy lifts all

Фото профиля Elijah Nicolas
Elijah Nicolas8 месяцев назад

The bigger question really has to do with the backend. Tesla has that much more processing power overall. They have the data. They have the know how.

Фото профиля TAB
TAB8 месяцев назад

It ends Tesla's ability to sell FSD to other car makers, but we knew that was already not happening.

Фото профиля Captain HaHaa
Captain HaHaa8 месяцев назад

I don't know enough about this subject to have a real opinion but I am enjoying watching it from the sidelines.

Фото профиля John Hanna
John Hanna8 месяцев назад

@TeslaFrenzy Tesla will win due to fleet size and economics. With their inexpensive to build two-seater , scale of production, automated operations, and vision-only sofờtare, they are years ahead and likely pulling away. They won’t stop here.

Фото профиля OIdman Ballsacks
OIdman Ballsacks8 месяцев назад

😂😂🤡🤡

Фото профиля Daoist Wang, Ph.D, theoretical biology.
Daoist Wang, Ph.D, theoretical biology.8 месяцев назад

We actually don't need cars anymore. That's the principle. Nvidia may not be preparing tools for autonomous vehicles but autonomous robots!

Фото профиля Chris
Chris8 месяцев назад

Sure? 1) how will you scale the robotaxi that fast if provided by Tesla? It takes years 2) if you think, that you just add all existing Tesla: i) really no card mapping required? ii) do you REALLY THINK THAT EXISTING Tesla users want others to give their car for a few bucks?😅

Фото профиля Robert Scoble
Robert Scoble8 месяцев назад

Tesla already has 10 million cars on the road. It all depends on Elon and what business model he picks for the Robotaxi network.

Фото профиля Chris
Chris8 месяцев назад

When I buy a car for 80k USD, do I want others wo drive my car for earning a few bucks? I don’t think so. This p2p sharing never worked!

Фото профиля Mike Boysen (JTBD/acc)
Mike Boysen (JTBD/acc)8 месяцев назад

Most people overspend on their cars, so I believe the answer is going to be yes. If they think they can recoup some of their costs, they'll be totally fine doing that. As Robert implied the automobile industry is going to be a huge question mark. This whole thing is going to drive utilization of automobiles way up, which means ownership will go way down. Which means we will need fewer automobiles. I guess we'll find out. I don't think it's going to take very long.

Фото профиля Chris
Chris8 месяцев назад

@Scobleizer Will be interesting to see, agree on that. We had this P2P usage here a couple of times in Switzerland and it never worked out. People leave cars dirty, with scratches etc. (And we are in CH! Clean and safe. Don’t want to know what happens in US 😅). But things can change!

Фото профиля Robert Scoble
Robert Scoble8 месяцев назад

Well, as soon as he gets CyberCab on the streets, he has a robot to clean it out. Plus, Sandy Munro says that they're designed to be hosed out. They're going to be clean when they arrive, and if they aren't, you're going to refuse the order, send it away, and get another one. When you send it away, it'll go for cleaning, get cleaned, and then get back in the robotaxi network. Older cars or other models like the Model Y or Cybertruck are going to need cleaning centers set up for them. It's a question of who is going to put their cars in the network, but since I have two cars and don't need the second one, I'd put the new Model Y into the network to make some money. As long as the money's there—and I believe it will be, at least in the San Francisco Bay Area—demand for autonomous vehicles is extraordinarily high. You can't even get them on some Friday nights.

Фото профиля Chris
Chris8 месяцев назад

@mikeboysen But to offer ALL THIS, you need a huge infrastructure in every city. This takes years. You can maybe offer this first in 1-2 big cities but also here it will take you already months to build this up. I still think you overestimate the advantage of Tesla and speed by a lot 😉

Фото профиля Robert Scoble
Robert Scoble8 месяцев назад

@mikeboysen It isn’t as hard as you might think.

Фото профиля Marco DZO ⚡️
Marco DZO ⚡️8 месяцев назад

🎯 Autonomy for traditional car makers is shooting themself in the foot... they know it and they don't want it.

Фото профиля chris
chris8 месяцев назад

Apple versus Microsoft/Google approach. Both work. Tesla will take the profits..

Фото профиля Sifossifoco
Sifossifoco8 месяцев назад

It kind of puts Uber back in the game, though

Фото профиля Brother To The Night
Brother To The Night8 месяцев назад

It affects Tesla in the sense that Tesla is the only real game in town for FSD features. Even people who don't like Elon buy Tesla's for their superior tech. Now the folks who don't like Tesla because they don't like Elon will be more willing to purchase other brands.

Фото профиля Shai Machnes
Shai Machnes8 месяцев назад

Almost right: The game is about to change to L4 aka Unsupervised FSD aka full autonomy. That will be in 1M+ Tesla's currently on American roads (the car can go get my teenager from the party - no need for a taxi), in robotaxis, trucks, and a thousand new use cases.

Фото профиля Turing Post
Turing Post8 месяцев назад

I think it’s beneficial for the whole industry. I wonder if Tesla and AVs powered by NVIDIA will be able to talk to each other (which I believe will be essential if they all are on the road). I also asked NVIDIA how their AV capabilites are compared to Tesla:

Фото профиля Justin Coope
Justin Coope8 месяцев назад

I see owning a non fsd ice vehicle as becoming like boat ownership is now. Expensive to maintain - expensive to insure, but a small percentage of people will do it.

Фото профиля Pradeep Banavara
Pradeep Banavara8 месяцев назад

It in fact reinforces Tesla's hypothesis of a end-end vision based system. Also the long tail of self driving is unfathomably long. Glad others are at least getting started.

Фото профиля The OFF-GRIDiot
The OFF-GRIDiot8 месяцев назад

What do u mean "switch to" ? Waymo is ticking up almost 2 million Level 4 miles a WEEK. Their software is headed to Toyotas and Hyundais for personal use. Tesla is stagnant with trying to get the "F" in FSD. YOU (the driver) are the backup to FSD. Everyone else uses TECHNOLOGY.🤨

Фото профиля Clifford
Clifford8 месяцев назад

NVIDIA will profit from its chips and AI solutions as a vendor at the expense of auto OEMs. Any OEM aggregating solutions externally will not thrive, even if they survive. NVIDIA's offerings might buy them some time, and they will likely leverage the stock market with news, but autonomy—especially Level 4—is a long way off, and in most cases, they will never reach it.

Фото профиля Mid Man 🇺🇸
Mid Man 🇺🇸8 месяцев назад

Unless it’s raining, or snowing, or sunrise, or sunset…then maybe you want a car with some sensors other than vision. I love how Telsa fanbois have been screaming victory for years and still not one unsupervised mile provided to a customer yet.

Фото профиля coinmaster 🚀📈📉🔋
coinmaster 🚀📈📉🔋8 месяцев назад

I agree, car ownership will fall faster than people think. A family will most likely have one owned car for long trips and other circumstances. Other than that everyone else will use a robotaxi. Younger people will more and more opt in to just ride-hailing an AV

Похожие видео

🎥🚨 Full transcription of Jorge Jesus' statements when asked about Cristiano Ronaldo in today's press conference ahead of their match against Denmark tomorrow... 🇵🇹🗣 Jorge Jesus: “Before answering the question, I want to make an interruption. For me, the most important thing, the most important thing, is the objective of what we have come here to do against Denmark. It is about respecting the opponent. We are going to play against a great opponent, with the ambition of continuing to win the Nations League. I don’t have one player, I have 23 players, and you can ask whatever questions you want about any player. But I’ll answer your question. As for Ronaldo, one question is not enough, three is too many. I will only answer two questions about Ronaldo, and then I won’t answer any more, because Ronaldo is not the main reason I am here. The main reason I am here is Denmark, and the fact that I am the national team coach. Now, to answer your question specifically. I have it memorised, but can you repeat it?” Journalist: “Whether coach Jorge Jesus agreed with Ronaldo on his playing time, and whether he refused to train yesterday with the national team.” 🇵🇹🗣 Jorge Jesus: “Well, it is true that I agreed something with him. But I didn’t only agree it with him. We also created a plan, as I did with Bruno Fernandes. I told Cris that he would not play in the game against Norway or the game against Denmark. He would not play because I believed that was the right thing to do. I worked with Cris for a year. I didn’t arrive at the national team three months ago and meet Cris. I worked with Cris for a year. I know his physical condition completely. I know because I already did this with him in Saudi Arabia. When there were games every three days, Cris rarely played. Furthermore, Cris never trains on the first day or the second day after a game. Never. He spent a year with me and never did. So, I agreed this with him. Before the game, I told him, and when we had our first press conference in Portugal, he also spoke about this. He said that whatever the coach wanted, whether he was asked to play or sit on the bench, he would sit on the bench. So, he never refused anything, and that is exactly what happened. But I am a coach who does not go to the bench thinking, ‘In 60 minutes I’m going to have Carlos Daniel,’ or, ‘In 70 minutes I’m going to have...’ That is not how I work on the bench. The game tells me what I am going to do. I thought that perhaps I had agreed with him that he would not play the first two games. But perhaps I would need him in the final minutes. However, the game dictated other things. It started telling me other things, and I did not put him on the pitch. That is the real point. And since I am talking about Cris, let me tell you something. I worked with Cris for a year. It seems as though there is some kind of issue between me and him. There is no issue at all. I have had issues with many players, but don’t turn this into an issue that does not exist. This was a coaching decision. I had a plan. If you want, I’ll also tell you about Bruno. Bruno, in the game against Norway, I told him... Bruno came after the game against... It was exactly the same. What does this tell you? It tells you something about the question I was asked earlier about a player having status, doesn’t it? Status is one thing. The rules are the same for everyone. Now, status allows the coach, or at least it does in my case, because of the players’ careers and what they have achieved, to be a little more careful about certain decisions before the game takes place. After the game takes place, it is the same. The coach has to make the decision. That is how I think, and I always make decisions based on one objective, which is what is best for the team, while always respecting the players..."

The Nassr Tribune™️

297,006 просмотров • 1 день назад

Peter Thiel on $NVDA (about a year ago): It is probably quite tricky. If you had to concretize it, one thing that is very strange is if you just follow the money, at this point 80 to 85% of the money in AI is being made by one company, it is NVIDIA. It is all on this very weird hardware layer, which Silicon Valley does not even know very much about anymore. We do not really do hardware, we do not do silicon chips in Silicon Valley anymore. I get pitched on these companies once every three or four years, and it is always, I have no clue how to do this, it sounds like a pretty good idea, but man, I have no clue, and we never invest. There is this theory that the hardware piece makes the money initially, then gets more commodified over time, and it will shift to software. And the, I do not know, multi trillion dollar question is whether that is going to be true again this time, or whether NVIDIA will have this incredible monopoly. I suspect NVIDIA will. I think it will maintain its position for a while. I think the game theory on it is something like this. All the big tech companies are going to start trying to design their own AI chips so they do not have to pay the 10x markup to NVIDIA. How hard is it for them to do it? How long will it take? If they all do it, then the chips become a commodity and nobody makes money in chips. So do you go into hardware? You should do it if nobody else is doing it. If everybody does it, you should not do it. I am not sure how that nets out, but probably people stay stuck for a while and NVIDIA goes from strength to strength for a while.

Wall St Engine

824,912 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Why is Palantir so expensive? You don’t need to look at spreadsheets. Just consider this: The market knows NVIDIA sells the shovels for the AI goldrush. The market is realizing that AI isn’t being monetized at the commercial level because although it’s cool, it’s not unlocking any real insights yet. The market now anticipates that Palantir is selling the maps to find the gold…. Gold being AI-driven insights that actually solve difficult problems. Software that works. Since 2021, NVIDIA’s revenue has exploded from $16B to $96B. Palantir’s TTM revenue is $2.5B. The trajectory of Palantir has changed since AIP released in 2023, which is enabling the company to scale. If NVIDIA sells the shovels, and Palantir provides the maps, then the market believes Palantir will see the same explosion of growth within the commercial market, which the market believes has an almost unlimited TAM for Palantir. A lot of people missed out on NVIDIA. While Palantir’s market cap is expensive at $95B, it is nothing compared to NVIDIA’s $3.26T market cap in terms of size. The market doesn’t want to miss out on the next big thing. At this point, investors have thrown all standard methods of valuation out of the window… Those days were years ago. To me, at this point, buying the stock is betting on NVIDIA-like growth (No I’m not saying the company will shoot to a $3T market cap in 2 years — you get the point). If the company does not show this sort of revenue growth, the stock will be punished. This is the risk investors are willing to take. While I am very bullish on the company in the long run, I, like everyone else, have no clue what will actually happen in the short term. This is not a stock to play on the short term. This is why I continue to hold, regardless of how “expensive” the stock gets. I personally believe Palantir does in fact carry the potential to see explosive revenue growth to more than enough justify its current ratios. I’m not saying it will happen this quarter. But the potential is there. It’s a matter of when, in my opinion. I would never risk selling what I view as my golden ticket to wealth with the justification of “it’s too expensive, the price will come back down and I can buy even more then”. If the stock crashes, I can start buying more shares regardless — I don’t want to get greedy and try to time the market. I would never forgive myself if I sold and the stock ended up soaring so high that even after a crash, it would be far too expensive for me to get back in with my original position size (plus capital gains tax). I don’t care who agrees with me or who thinks I’m crazy for saying this — it’s a real risk to me and I’m not willing to take it. This is not me telling you to buy $PLTR. My average is $8.50. Only you can decide what is right, and your decision should be made on your own level of conviction from studying the company — nothing else. This is me telling you why it’s so expensive. Again, I believe that if the stock does not continue to crush earnings each quarter, even the slightest miss, the stock will be punished in the short term. For longs, it’s another opportunity to accumulate more. This is my opinion, of course. 5-10 years from now, we’ll see who was right. Chips & Ontology.

Jack Prescott

278,422 просмотров • 2 лет назад