Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The second court hearing pertaining to a case I submitted before the Sindh High Court was held today. During the previous hearing, the honorable court issued notices to the Defense Minister, the FIA, and other relevant officials, and notified them to appear and submit their responses. However, none of...

SammiBaluch's profile picture

Sammi Deen Baloch

174,628 subscribers

57,583 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Jalila Haider#FreePalestine
Jalila Haider#FreePalestine1 год назад

More power to you 🌺

Фото профиля 1234
12341 год назад

آپ بہت پیاری ہو اور اتنی کم عمر میں اتنی جدوجہد کر رہی ہیں آپ اللہ پاک آپ کو کامیاب کرے اور بلوچستان کو اور بلوچستان میں رہنے والوں کو ان کا حق ملے، مجھے آپ سے ملنے کا بہت دل ہے

Фото профиля Munawar Khan sherani
Munawar Khan sherani1 год назад

We want justice for @SammiBaluch

Фото профиля Imran Khan
Imran Khan1 год назад

Sami Deen Baloch is a brave daughter of a brave nation❤️✌️

Фото профиля Nobat Baloch
Nobat Baloch1 год назад

Applying legal procedure for adjudication of a matter, specially when the applicant is a Baloch political worker, is a waste of time, where judiciary is a joke in this military State

Фото профиля Rajkumar (Jai Samvidhan)
Rajkumar (Jai Samvidhan)1 год назад

Judiciary is a joke in militarized pakistan esp for Baloch people..Judiciary works only for punjabis, ruling political leaders n military establishment..More n more power to you all that are fighting for your human rights for all..

Фото профиля It's X
It's X1 год назад

U should be permanently banned from flying.

Фото профиля Mir ماهدAli Al baloush🇶🇦♥️
Mir ماهدAli Al baloush🇶🇦♥️1 год назад

More power to you banok ♥️♥️✌🏼

Фото профиля Abdullah Rajput
Abdullah Rajput1 год назад

BLA ki Taxi

Фото профиля Salman Hamza
Salman Hamza1 год назад

More power to you

Похожие видео

VIDEO | Here's what senior advocate HS Phoolka said on Supreme Court hearing a plea challenging the Madras High Court judgment which held that watching pornographic content containing children in private is not an offence. "In the child pornography case, the Madras High Court had held that watching pornographic content containing children in private is not an offence. However, during the hearing in Supreme Court today, the CJI was shocked over the verdict of the Madras High Court. He said that it is a clear offence and has issued a notice over it."
2:12

VIDEO | Here's what senior advocate HS Phoolka said on Supreme Court hearing a plea challenging the Madras High Court judgment which held that watching pornographic content containing children in private is not an offence. "In the child pornography case, the Madras High Court had held that watching pornographic content containing children in private is not an offence. However, during the hearing in Supreme Court today, the CJI was shocked over the verdict of the Madras High Court. He said that it is a clear offence and has issued a notice over it."

Press Trust of India

43,055 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Article 25 of the Constitution on the right to fair hearing is sacrosanct. The High Court found that Honorable Rigathi Gachagua was not given a fair hearing in the impeachment process. In my view, after that finding, the proper and inevitable conclusion was to annul that impeachment. #Ukombozi
4:16

Article 25 of the Constitution on the right to fair hearing is sacrosanct. The High Court found that Honorable Rigathi Gachagua was not given a fair hearing in the impeachment process. In my view, after that finding, the proper and inevitable conclusion was to annul that impeachment. #Ukombozi

David Maraga

12,380 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Thabo Bester and co-accused case postponed to the 10th of February. They appeared before the Free State High Court for a pre-trial hearing.
5:06

Thabo Bester and co-accused case postponed to the 10th of February. They appeared before the Free State High Court for a pre-trial hearing.

MDN NEWS

140,684 просмотров • 2 лет назад

The constitution isn’t optional. The Supreme Court has issued multiple court orders to Homeland Security, and this Administration is flat-out ignoring them. Homeland Security officials need to uphold the law, not the political whims of President Trump.
1:36

The constitution isn’t optional. The Supreme Court has issued multiple court orders to Homeland Security, and this Administration is flat-out ignoring them. Homeland Security officials need to uphold the law, not the political whims of President Trump.

Sen. Elissa Slotkin

92,362 просмотров • 1 год назад

"Everyone Can't Come Directly to the Supreme Court" A dramatic exchange unfolded in the Supreme Court after a petitioner repeatedly insisted that her plea under Article 32 was maintainable, despite the Bench advising her to approach the jurisdictional High Court. As the arguments continued, the Court stressed the importance of following the judicial hierarchy, observing that parties cannot bypass High Courts and approach the Supreme Court directly in every case. The hearing ended with the Bench dismissing the plea while granting liberty to seek appropriate relief before the High Court. [ Lawbeat, Legal News, Supreme Court ] #SupremeCourt #CourtroomExchange #Article32 #HighCourt #LegalNews
2:13

"Everyone Can't Come Directly to the Supreme Court" A dramatic exchange unfolded in the Supreme Court after a petitioner repeatedly insisted that her plea under Article 32 was maintainable, despite the Bench advising her to approach the jurisdictional High Court. As the arguments continued, the Court stressed the importance of following the judicial hierarchy, observing that parties cannot bypass High Courts and approach the Supreme Court directly in every case. The hearing ended with the Bench dismissing the plea while granting liberty to seek appropriate relief before the High Court. [ Lawbeat, Legal News, Supreme Court ] #SupremeCourt #CourtroomExchange #Article32 #HighCourt #LegalNews

LawBeat

69,757 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

#WATCH | Delhi | On NEET (UG) 2026 paper leak case, Tanvi Dubey, Advocate representing Federation of All India Medical Association’s plea, says, “Today was an important hearing of NEET because NTA and the chairperson of the committees filed their affidavits. Supreme Court conducted a detailed hearing… The Supreme Court questioned the Chairman as to which areas are yet to comply. The SC also gave an important observation that accountability is important, as systemic failures are a result of a lack of accountability. The Solicitor General also gave the statement that the case is being monitored by PM Modi… The court has kept this matter pending as they want to observe the matter… The next hearing has been scheduled in July…”
2:05

#WATCH | Delhi | On NEET (UG) 2026 paper leak case, Tanvi Dubey, Advocate representing Federation of All India Medical Association’s plea, says, “Today was an important hearing of NEET because NTA and the chairperson of the committees filed their affidavits. Supreme Court conducted a detailed hearing… The Supreme Court questioned the Chairman as to which areas are yet to comply. The SC also gave an important observation that accountability is important, as systemic failures are a result of a lack of accountability. The Solicitor General also gave the statement that the case is being monitored by PM Modi… The court has kept this matter pending as they want to observe the matter… The next hearing has been scheduled in July…”

ANI

14,077 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

RTO officials entered the house and towed away his Lamborghini car. Some very interesting observations were made in court during the hearing. Watch 👇
10:30

RTO officials entered the house and towed away his Lamborghini car. Some very interesting observations were made in court during the hearing. Watch 👇

Kiran Aradhya

135,753 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Very happy and proud to note that the Queer Chennai Chronicles and TheNewsMinute led community glossary of LGBTQIA+ terms was submitted to the Supreme Court Constitution Bench hearing the #MarriageEquality petitions today by Senior Advocate Vrinda Grover.
0:37

Very happy and proud to note that the Queer Chennai Chronicles and TheNewsMinute led community glossary of LGBTQIA+ terms was submitted to the Supreme Court Constitution Bench hearing the #MarriageEquality petitions today by Senior Advocate Vrinda Grover.

TheNewsMinute

87,232 просмотров • 3 лет назад

The Karnataka High Court, before the single bench of Hon’ble Justice M. Nagaprasanna, heard petitions seeking transfer of the investigation into the alleged KPSC recruitment scam, including the probe against suspended KPSC Chairman Shivashankarappa Sahukar and the alleged irregularities in the recruitment of Veterinary Officers to the CBI. During the hearing, Advocate Venkatesh Dalawai appearing for the petitioners, submitted that one of the selected candidates is related to the suspended Chairman and alleged that bribes of around ₹80 lakh were paid to secure appointments. He further brought to the Court’s notice that the State Home Minister had publicly stated that the KPSC scam FIRs had been transferred to the CID for investigation. Expressing serious concern over the allegations, the Court observed that the matter appeared to be a case of “daylight robbery.” The bench questioned how candidates could have secured unusually high marks without the involvement of officials within the KPSC and remarked that the Commission had functioned efficiently until around 1998, after which several recruitment processes had become embroiled in controversy. The Court also observed that an investigation by the State’s own agency, the CID, may not inspire public confidence in a case of such magnitude. High Court directed the State Government to explain why the investigation should not be entrusted to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and ordered it to place the entire investigation material before the Court. The State has been granted one week’s time to file its response and produce the relevant records. The Court also directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners. Notices have been issued to the State Government and the CBI and the matter has been posted for further hearing on 7 August 2026.
9:05

The Karnataka High Court, before the single bench of Hon’ble Justice M. Nagaprasanna, heard petitions seeking transfer of the investigation into the alleged KPSC recruitment scam, including the probe against suspended KPSC Chairman Shivashankarappa Sahukar and the alleged irregularities in the recruitment of Veterinary Officers to the CBI. During the hearing, Advocate Venkatesh Dalawai appearing for the petitioners, submitted that one of the selected candidates is related to the suspended Chairman and alleged that bribes of around ₹80 lakh were paid to secure appointments. He further brought to the Court’s notice that the State Home Minister had publicly stated that the KPSC scam FIRs had been transferred to the CID for investigation. Expressing serious concern over the allegations, the Court observed that the matter appeared to be a case of “daylight robbery.” The bench questioned how candidates could have secured unusually high marks without the involvement of officials within the KPSC and remarked that the Commission had functioned efficiently until around 1998, after which several recruitment processes had become embroiled in controversy. The Court also observed that an investigation by the State’s own agency, the CID, may not inspire public confidence in a case of such magnitude. High Court directed the State Government to explain why the investigation should not be entrusted to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and ordered it to place the entire investigation material before the Court. The State has been granted one week’s time to file its response and produce the relevant records. The Court also directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners. Notices have been issued to the State Government and the CBI and the matter has been posted for further hearing on 7 August 2026.

ರವಿ ಕೀರ್ತಿ ಗೌಡ

16,148 просмотров • 3 дней назад

#WATCH | Delhi | On the Supreme Court's observations after hearing the petitions challenging the Waqf Amendment Act, Congress leader Imran Pratapgarhi says, "I am thankful to the Supreme Court for the interim relief. The Court raised almost all the issues that we raised in the parliamnet. Today's ruling shows that this law has been made against the Constitution. It's a win for the Constitution and not any side. In the days to come, the Court will provide more relief and will stop the government's conspiracy to grab the land."
0:45

#WATCH | Delhi | On the Supreme Court's observations after hearing the petitions challenging the Waqf Amendment Act, Congress leader Imran Pratapgarhi says, "I am thankful to the Supreme Court for the interim relief. The Court raised almost all the issues that we raised in the parliamnet. Today's ruling shows that this law has been made against the Constitution. It's a win for the Constitution and not any side. In the days to come, the Court will provide more relief and will stop the government's conspiracy to grab the land."

ANI

28,211 просмотров • 1 год назад

Sipapa and wife Shamirah have this morning been brought to Magistrates Court Makindye for the Nth hearing for another witness hearing. The case is expected to reach judgement in July.
0:30

Sipapa and wife Shamirah have this morning been brought to Magistrates Court Makindye for the Nth hearing for another witness hearing. The case is expected to reach judgement in July.

BigEyeUG

32,237 просмотров • 1 год назад

#WATCH | Kolkata | On ED sending a mail to the Acting Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court for urgent hearing of the matter and for change of judge in ED raid matter, Advocate Arka Kumar Nag says, "There were a lot of people and law interns unrelated to the matter, in the court when the matter was to be heard... Even MP Kalyan Banerjee was present and requested the advocates to disperse in lieu of the judge, but the chaos was high... Ultimately, the judge left the courtroom, and the hearing was postponed. After this, we heard that the ED approached the office of the Chief Justice for an early hearing, but the plea was not considered, and the matter will now be heard on 14th January." (09.01)
1:09

#WATCH | Kolkata | On ED sending a mail to the Acting Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court for urgent hearing of the matter and for change of judge in ED raid matter, Advocate Arka Kumar Nag says, "There were a lot of people and law interns unrelated to the matter, in the court when the matter was to be heard... Even MP Kalyan Banerjee was present and requested the advocates to disperse in lieu of the judge, but the chaos was high... Ultimately, the judge left the courtroom, and the hearing was postponed. After this, we heard that the ED approached the office of the Chief Justice for an early hearing, but the plea was not considered, and the matter will now be heard on 14th January." (09.01)

ANI

34,420 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Charlie Kirk’s cowardly killer, Tyler Robinson, appeared virtually before a judge in his first court hearing. There is nothing behind those eyes. That is the face of pure evil. He remained silent for the entire hearing...only leaning forward once to state his name. Robinson’s next court appearance is scheduled for September 29th, and he will remain in custody without bail.
3:34

Charlie Kirk’s cowardly killer, Tyler Robinson, appeared virtually before a judge in his first court hearing. There is nothing behind those eyes. That is the face of pure evil. He remained silent for the entire hearing...only leaning forward once to state his name. Robinson’s next court appearance is scheduled for September 29th, and he will remain in custody without bail.

Vigilant Fox 🦊

86,166 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

[WATCH] Lawyers representing the Society for the Protection of our Constitution say they've received instructions to approach the International Criminal Court regarding the standoff between law enforcement officials and illegal miners in Stilfontein. This is after the Pretoria High Court dismissed the organisation's case to compel the government to provide humanitarian aid to illegal miners who are still underground. Refiloe Fiffy Seboko has the details. #Newzroom405
6:54

[WATCH] Lawyers representing the Society for the Protection of our Constitution say they've received instructions to approach the International Criminal Court regarding the standoff between law enforcement officials and illegal miners in Stilfontein. This is after the Pretoria High Court dismissed the organisation's case to compel the government to provide humanitarian aid to illegal miners who are still underground. Refiloe Fiffy Seboko has the details. #Newzroom405

Newzroom Afrika

99,817 просмотров • 1 год назад

**Giggle v Tickle updates** • Tickle has applied to cross appeal, wanting the decision upgraded from “indirect discrimination” to “direct discrimination” + more $$$ in damages and $$$ in aggravated damages. • The Australian Human Rights sex discrimination Commissioner has once again applied to intervene. They intervened as amicus curiae in Tickle v Giggle and interpreted the law to favor gender identity over sex/legal sex over biological sex. • The Australian Christian Lobby has applied to intervene on the side of sex based rights. • The case management hearing is scheduled for February 12 at the Federal Court in Sydney. • It is likely that the appeal will be heard in August, 2025. This appeal is to the full Federal Court. That means 3 Federal Court judges not 1. Due to the cross appeal, the hearing is likely to go for 3-4 days rather than the usual 1 in an appeal. • The reason the Giggle appeal is to the full Federal Court and not the High Court is because the Tickle v Giggle decision got both facts about the case & facts about the law wrong. So it remains a Federal Court matter. • After a full Federal Court appeal decision, the side who didn’t get the decision in their favor can apply to go to the High Court. As I have said from the very beginning, I am willing to do that if that is what is necessary. • The Giggle legal team is Stuart Wood AM KC, Bridie Nolan, Anca Costin and Katherine Deves. • The next updates will be after the case management hearing & will address whether the cross appeal & interveners were permitted. • As always, thank you everyone for the endless support. It is invaluable to me. This has been a very long & stressful process for 3 years and it’s not over yet. Ultimately, I am very optimistic. In part because I know I am right - men are not women - but also because it is clear that the global capture of gender ideology is falling. • For more information & donations, please visit 🩷
1:02

**Giggle v Tickle updates** • Tickle has applied to cross appeal, wanting the decision upgraded from “indirect discrimination” to “direct discrimination” + more $$$ in damages and $$$ in aggravated damages. • The Australian Human Rights sex discrimination Commissioner has once again applied to intervene. They intervened as amicus curiae in Tickle v Giggle and interpreted the law to favor gender identity over sex/legal sex over biological sex. • The Australian Christian Lobby has applied to intervene on the side of sex based rights. • The case management hearing is scheduled for February 12 at the Federal Court in Sydney. • It is likely that the appeal will be heard in August, 2025. This appeal is to the full Federal Court. That means 3 Federal Court judges not 1. Due to the cross appeal, the hearing is likely to go for 3-4 days rather than the usual 1 in an appeal. • The reason the Giggle appeal is to the full Federal Court and not the High Court is because the Tickle v Giggle decision got both facts about the case & facts about the law wrong. So it remains a Federal Court matter. • After a full Federal Court appeal decision, the side who didn’t get the decision in their favor can apply to go to the High Court. As I have said from the very beginning, I am willing to do that if that is what is necessary. • The Giggle legal team is Stuart Wood AM KC, Bridie Nolan, Anca Costin and Katherine Deves. • The next updates will be after the case management hearing & will address whether the cross appeal & interveners were permitted. • As always, thank you everyone for the endless support. It is invaluable to me. This has been a very long & stressful process for 3 years and it’s not over yet. Ultimately, I am very optimistic. In part because I know I am right - men are not women - but also because it is clear that the global capture of gender ideology is falling. • For more information & donations, please visit 🩷

Sall Grover

1,641,421 просмотров • 1 год назад

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: AIMIM leader Waris Pathan arrives at the Goregaon Aarey Dargah demolition site. He says, “They are not allowing me to go inside the dargah premises. They have completely demolished it. An urgent petition was filed yesterday by the trustees of the dargah, and the matter was listed for a hearing at 2:00 PM today at the Dindoshi Court. However, before that could happen, authorities arrived at 9:00 AM this morning and began tearing down the entire structure. What is this? At least give us a fair opportunity to approach the judiciary. The matter was filed in court; it was sub judice and pending before the judge. The trustees have legally moved the court, yet you did not even allow them their day in court. The hearing was scheduled for 2:00 PM. Instead, you use your power, you misuse the courts, you deploy your police machinery, and you come here just to demolish everything. You are not allowing a single person to enter the premises, and even I am being barred from entering…”
2:41

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: AIMIM leader Waris Pathan arrives at the Goregaon Aarey Dargah demolition site. He says, “They are not allowing me to go inside the dargah premises. They have completely demolished it. An urgent petition was filed yesterday by the trustees of the dargah, and the matter was listed for a hearing at 2:00 PM today at the Dindoshi Court. However, before that could happen, authorities arrived at 9:00 AM this morning and began tearing down the entire structure. What is this? At least give us a fair opportunity to approach the judiciary. The matter was filed in court; it was sub judice and pending before the judge. The trustees have legally moved the court, yet you did not even allow them their day in court. The hearing was scheduled for 2:00 PM. Instead, you use your power, you misuse the courts, you deploy your police machinery, and you come here just to demolish everything. You are not allowing a single person to enter the premises, and even I am being barred from entering…”

ANI

60,926 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨COURT REPORT - RYAN FIRESTONE Firestone Actual Address Dispute Leads to Shock Custody Decision at St Albans Crown Court! I attended a hearing today at St Albans Crown Court involving Ryan Firestone - and what unfolded in court was unexpected. A dispute over something as basic as his address ultimately resulted in Ryan being remanded in custody until Monday’s hearing. Presiding over the hearing was Judge Mann. From the public gallery, I have to say I was surprised to see how the hearing unfolded, particularly the decision to keep Ryan in custody until next week. The issue centred on the address Ryan had previously given the court. Judge Mann raised concerns that the address appeared to be a business or office address rather than a residential one, and pressed Ryan to explain where he actually lives. Ryan told the court the office address is currently the only place he is able to stay and receive correspondence. Without it, he explained, he would effectively have nowhere else to stay. Ryan also told the court he owns a separate residential property outright, but said he has been unable to live there. According to Ryan, every time he has attempted to return to that property he has been faced with possible arrest, preventing him from accessing the home. “I would like nothing more than to go back to that house,” he told the court. When the address of that property was checked during the hearing, information suggested the house had apparently been sold last July. Ryan strongly disputed that claim and said he holds Land Registry documents confirming the property is still in his name, although he did not have the documents with him in court. He asked whether he could access his email to retrieve the documents there and then, but that request was not granted. The court also questioned Ryan about council tax, utilities and residency at the property. At one stage Ryan attempted to show the court his driving licence displaying the address he currently uses, but the judge declined to review it and expressed surprise that the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) would issue a licence linked to what appeared to be a business premises. Judge Mann also questioned why the address had not been properly verified at a previous hearing, expressing some surprise that the issue had not already been resolved earlier in proceedings. Ryan then asked the judge directly whether, if he could provide Land Registry proof of ownership at the next hearing, the court would consider issuing an order allowing him to return to the property he says he owns. The judge indicated that if ownership were proven, such an order could be considered. However, the hearing concluded with the court ruling that Ryan would remain in custody until Monday at 10am, while checks are carried out regarding the property and its ownership. The prosecution were directed to make enquiries before the case returns to court. Watching from the public gallery, one question stood out: If someone cannot currently access their home, what address are they expected to give the court if the only place they can stay is a business premises? The case returns to court Monday morning, where the ownership of the disputed property is expected to be clarified. I’ll continue to follow developments. #Lawfare #TwoTierJustice
2:54

🚨COURT REPORT - RYAN FIRESTONE Firestone Actual Address Dispute Leads to Shock Custody Decision at St Albans Crown Court! I attended a hearing today at St Albans Crown Court involving Ryan Firestone - and what unfolded in court was unexpected. A dispute over something as basic as his address ultimately resulted in Ryan being remanded in custody until Monday’s hearing. Presiding over the hearing was Judge Mann. From the public gallery, I have to say I was surprised to see how the hearing unfolded, particularly the decision to keep Ryan in custody until next week. The issue centred on the address Ryan had previously given the court. Judge Mann raised concerns that the address appeared to be a business or office address rather than a residential one, and pressed Ryan to explain where he actually lives. Ryan told the court the office address is currently the only place he is able to stay and receive correspondence. Without it, he explained, he would effectively have nowhere else to stay. Ryan also told the court he owns a separate residential property outright, but said he has been unable to live there. According to Ryan, every time he has attempted to return to that property he has been faced with possible arrest, preventing him from accessing the home. “I would like nothing more than to go back to that house,” he told the court. When the address of that property was checked during the hearing, information suggested the house had apparently been sold last July. Ryan strongly disputed that claim and said he holds Land Registry documents confirming the property is still in his name, although he did not have the documents with him in court. He asked whether he could access his email to retrieve the documents there and then, but that request was not granted. The court also questioned Ryan about council tax, utilities and residency at the property. At one stage Ryan attempted to show the court his driving licence displaying the address he currently uses, but the judge declined to review it and expressed surprise that the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) would issue a licence linked to what appeared to be a business premises. Judge Mann also questioned why the address had not been properly verified at a previous hearing, expressing some surprise that the issue had not already been resolved earlier in proceedings. Ryan then asked the judge directly whether, if he could provide Land Registry proof of ownership at the next hearing, the court would consider issuing an order allowing him to return to the property he says he owns. The judge indicated that if ownership were proven, such an order could be considered. However, the hearing concluded with the court ruling that Ryan would remain in custody until Monday at 10am, while checks are carried out regarding the property and its ownership. The prosecution were directed to make enquiries before the case returns to court. Watching from the public gallery, one question stood out: If someone cannot currently access their home, what address are they expected to give the court if the only place they can stay is a business premises? The case returns to court Monday morning, where the ownership of the disputed property is expected to be clarified. I’ll continue to follow developments. #Lawfare #TwoTierJustice

Gauci Reports

15,381 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад