Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The Trolley Problem, explained [🎞️ Zack D. Films]

85,612 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Dr Vineet Govinda Gupta
Dr Vineet Govinda Gupta1 год назад

It is a false analogy because the survival of the 5 transplant recipients is not 100% assured, and also their future life expectancy will be diminished compared to a healthy person. This differs from the original trolley problem.

Фото профиля Нягтлан бодогч нь байна аа
Нягтлан бодогч нь байна аа1 год назад

I would use brakes

Фото профиля Rajit
Rajit1 год назад

Another way to look at this: If you decide to not do anything, then you're *letting* 5 people die. If you change the trolley's direction, then you're saving 5 people, but actively choosing to kill 1 person in the process.

Фото профиля Mike Hibbert
Mike Hibbert1 год назад

Who does this? I've never seen a train rescue on the news!

Фото профиля James Hurst
James Hurst1 год назад

I would call this example false equivalence.

Фото профиля equilibrium
equilibrium1 год назад

If I have the option to harvest the organ from a healthy person, there must be a reason why that's an option for me. So it would be important to know why that option is on the table for me to consider.

Фото профиля Mօʀɖɛռ iֆ Aʟɨʋɛ
Mօʀɖɛռ iֆ Aʟɨʋɛ1 год назад

How do I make the train run over them all?

Фото профиля Stillbonking - feline Fella 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿❤️🇺🇦
Stillbonking - feline Fella 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿❤️🇺🇦1 год назад

As an ex train driver who has hit 2 people driving trains (suicides), first one at 50mph, second one at 85mph, there isn't much left of the body to harvest. (I was alright, shaky for 5 minutes or so but it was their choice)

Фото профиля dkzz4
dkzz41 год назад

The very formulation of the question is manipulation. You are not required to make any choice.)

Фото профиля Deep Kamal Singh
Deep Kamal Singh1 год назад

This ancient moral dilemma has been very well solved by capitalism: “ just Save those who can pay the most”

Похожие видео