正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

The Trolley Problem, explained [🎞️ Zack D. Films]

85,612 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Dr Vineet Govinda Gupta 的头像
Dr Vineet Govinda Gupta1 年前

It is a false analogy because the survival of the 5 transplant recipients is not 100% assured, and also their future life expectancy will be diminished compared to a healthy person. This differs from the original trolley problem.

Нягтлан бодогч нь байна аа 的头像
Нягтлан бодогч нь байна аа1 年前

I would use brakes

Rajit 的头像
Rajit1 年前

Another way to look at this: If you decide to not do anything, then you're *letting* 5 people die. If you change the trolley's direction, then you're saving 5 people, but actively choosing to kill 1 person in the process.

Mike Hibbert 的头像
Mike Hibbert1 年前

Who does this? I've never seen a train rescue on the news!

James Hurst 的头像
James Hurst1 年前

I would call this example false equivalence.

equilibrium 的头像
equilibrium1 年前

If I have the option to harvest the organ from a healthy person, there must be a reason why that's an option for me. So it would be important to know why that option is on the table for me to consider.

Mօʀɖɛռ iֆ Aʟɨʋɛ 的头像
Mօʀɖɛռ iֆ Aʟɨʋɛ1 年前

How do I make the train run over them all?

Stillbonking - feline Fella 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿❤️🇺🇦 的头像
Stillbonking - feline Fella 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿❤️🇺🇦1 年前

As an ex train driver who has hit 2 people driving trains (suicides), first one at 50mph, second one at 85mph, there isn't much left of the body to harvest. (I was alright, shaky for 5 minutes or so but it was their choice)

dkzz4 的头像
dkzz41 年前

The very formulation of the question is manipulation. You are not required to make any choice.)

Deep Kamal Singh 的头像
Deep Kamal Singh1 年前

This ancient moral dilemma has been very well solved by capitalism: “ just Save those who can pay the most”

相关视频