Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Then came a move that few presidents would touch. This was a mini revolution. Instead of dancing around the DEI issue, Trump simply walked in and ended it. Hanson called it “the third rail”—the issue no one dares confront. But Trump didn’t hesitate. He pointed to a Supreme Court...

407,898 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 16

Фото профиля The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 год назад

🚨 Victor Davis Hanson just exposed what the media refuses to admit about Trump's first 100 days. This was a masterclass breakdown—and it changes everything you think you know about Trump's second term. If you want the raw truth about Trump, not media spin, read this thread. 🧵

Фото профиля The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 год назад

📍And don’t forget to bookmark the post above—you won’t hear these wins from the media, but you’ll want to revisit every single one of them. Now, onto the clips!

Фото профиля The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 год назад

Victor Davis Hanson kicked off the list with the most jaw-dropping revelation of all. In just 100 days, Trump pulled off a border miracle that the so-called experts said was impossible. “He has completely reversed 10,000 people coming in a day, over 300,000 a month, 12,000,000 in 4 years to essentially 97. 98% of the border is secure,” Hanson said. “In fact, there is no open border now.” And Trump’s just getting started. Hanson explained that the next battle is already underway: “Now, he has pivoted to try to address the 12 million people that Joe Biden not only let in, but scattered all over the United States on often state federal local subsidy.” It’s a massive mess. But if Trump could shut the border when everyone said it couldn’t be done — what’s stopping him now? “That's going to be a task,” Hanson admitted. “But he has shut the border. No comprehensive immigration reform, none of the things they said was necessary, none of the things that said that it was impossible, that hampered by. He just did it. We've never seen anything like it.” He didn’t ask for permission. He didn’t wait for Congress. He just got it done.

Фото профиля The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 год назад

Next up: energy. Hanson said Trump hasn’t just altered America’s energy strategy—he’s completely transformed it. The Green New Deal is gone. The electric vehicle mandates? Dead in the water. Instead of wasting billions on failed climate fantasies, Trump is tapping back into the energy sources that made America strong. Clean coal is being revived. Fracking is expanding. O il and gas fields are being reopened. And America is once again exporting LNG to Europe, which desperately needs it. During the Biden years, oil prices soared to $120 a barrel. Today, they’ve dropped by half—and Trump isn’t draining the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to fake those numbers like Biden did before the midterms. He’s preparing to refill it. The message is clear: under Trump, energy independence isn’t a dream—it’s reality.

Фото профиля The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 год назад

Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical updates. Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed. → @VigilantFox Now, back to the story you came for.

Фото профиля The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 год назад

On the economy, Trump has shattered expectations and flipped the global trade order on its head. “Everybody said he wiped out the stock market because he insisted on not just free trade, but fair trade,” Hanson said. They mocked him for taking on China. Now the world is lining up to make deals. “And he said he was going to sanction China. And he did. Now all of a sudden we have 70 countries trying to negotiate. And as I’m speaking, nations such as Italy or Japan want to make a deal,” Hanson explained. So what’s the plan? “A deal is they’re not going to run up surpluses at the same extent. We have a $1.1 trillion trade deficit.” And Trump’s momentum is just beginning. “Donald Trump is going to get in the next few weeks a few major nations. And once he does to make a deal, all the others will not want to be without a chair. When the music stops, they will want to follow. When they follow. China will be eager to negotiate because its efforts to get Europe on its side have failed.” Trump isn’t just fixing America’s economy — he’s rewriting the global rules of the game.

Фото профиля The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 год назад

On foreign policy, Trump is restoring America's strength — and making peace possible again. “If you look very quickly abroad, Donald Trump is still trying to find peace. And no, he’s not Putin’s puppet. He’s been very tough on Putin,” Hanson said. And Trump’s strategy is tough where it counts. “He suggests he would have a secondary oil boycott on nations that bought Russian oil, something Biden never imagined. But he is getting frustrated by both sides, and he’s putting renewed pressure in the Middle East.” Iran is crumbling. And Trump isn’t playing games. “Iran is at its weakest point. Israel is ready to take out the nuclear facilities to the extent it cannot without sophisticated heavy bombers. And Donald Trump is not looking for an optional war. He’s telling the Iranians, time is running out. Settle, dismantle.” The Red Sea is open for navigation. The Houthis are in retreat,” Hanson explained. There’s no appeasement here — no deals with terrorists. “There is nobody in the United States who wants to negotiate with Hamas or Hezbollah. It’s an entirely new game.” Meanwhile, China is starting to sweat. “China is very worried that its companies are going to be delisted, that are fraudulent from the stock market in the United States. They’re very worried,” Hanson added.

Фото профиля The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 год назад

And finally, Hanson closed with this: Trump’s first 100 days have been revolutionary. Not since Reagan or FDR has a president driven this much change in so little time. That, Hanson said, is exactly why the system is panicking. “No one in their right mind thought anybody would try to stage a counter-revolution and be so successful in the first hundred days.” This isn’t just another shift in policy. It’s the end of an era—and the beginning of something new.

Фото профиля The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 год назад

Thanks for reading. If you appreciate this kind of reporting, follow me for more daily threads. —> @VigilantFox Craving another political thread? Leavitt and Bessent just unveiled the kickoff to Trump’s golden age of the U.S. economy!

Фото профиля Slingshot News
Slingshot News2 лет назад

🚨EXCLUSIVE: ‘One Of The Greatest Villains In American History’: Democrats Releases Scathing Statement On RFK Jr. What do YOU think about RFK's Campaign? Let us know in the comments ⬇️ Be sure to follow @NewsSlingshot for more exclusive reports!

Фото профиля Skatvedt
Skatvedt1 год назад

Correction: We were doing precisely the opposite of what Dr Martin Luther King said we should do. Dr King said we should be colorblind, and work on merit, not skin colour.

Фото профиля Cayla Carter
Cayla Carter1 год назад

Actually for decades we were told NOT TO JUDGE BY THE COLOR OF SKIN, BUT THE CONTENT OF CHARACTER. For the last 4 years we were told character and experience didn't matter but the color of the skin or gender identity mattered. MOST U.S. citizens did not buy into DEI

Фото профиля letsgo4kindness
letsgo4kindness1 год назад

Fox, could you correct something here? You misspoke on the DEI point. Hanson said we WERE doing the opposite of what MLK taught us. You phrased it as “NOW” we ARE doing the opposite of what MLK taught. I don’t want people to get the incorrect idea!

Фото профиля Margarethe
Margarethe1 год назад

This is wrong. Martin Luther King urged us to judge people by their character, not the color of their skin.

Фото профиля LuAnne
LuAnne1 год назад

Not to mention the cost of DEI. It permeated every crack & crevice and costing a fortune. It was just another boondoggle.

Фото профиля D
D1 год назад

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE are on Donald Trump’s side

Похожие видео

Victor Davis Hanson unpacked why Donald Trump has taken aim at Harvard University—and made clear that this is no impulsive move. It’s a calculated stand, rooted in a long list of grievances. “Recently, Donald Trump has escalated his struggle with Harvard University,” Hanson began, setting the stage. At the center of the clash is Harvard’s response to a 2022 Supreme Court ruling that struck down affirmative action in college admissions. The Court ordered schools like Harvard and UNC to stop giving preference in admissions, hiring, and promotion based on race or gender. But Hanson argued Harvard simply sidestepped the ruling. “They were by court order to stop giving preference... what we would call DEI,” he said. “Harvard has been skirting that, and I think the data is pretty clear... there’s no question they’ve been doing it.” That was just the beginning. Hanson pointed to other long-standing issues: undisclosed foreign money, often from countries like Communist China and Qatar, and campus practices that seem increasingly radical. “There have been, in the past, graduations and dorms that have a racial basis—almost a segregation element to them,” he said. And when it comes to speech? Hanson claimed Harvard hasn’t exactly protected the First Amendment. “You can make the argument that they don’t fully honor the First Amendment when you have guest speakers,” he noted, describing how students are often allowed—if not outright encouraged—to shut down viewpoints they don’t agree with. Then came the most explosive accusation: a growing climate of antisemitism. Hanson recalled two Harvard students who assaulted a Jewish peer—one was later given a $65,000 honorarium through the law school, the other honored as a graduation marshal at the Divinity School. “That sent the wrong message,” he said.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

194,702 просмотров • 1 год назад

VDH Pointing At Megyn Kelly Morphing Into A Zombie: “They’ve Lost Their Minds” “It reminds me of all of these movies like The Invasion of the Body Snatchers or The Last of Us or The Walking Dead... you never really know who’s a zombie until they turn." Victor Davis Hanson, the historian and national speaker, addressed the evolving landscape of American attitudes toward Israel and antisemitism in a recent in today's episode of the Victor Davis Hanson In His Own Words, highlighting what he described as a troubling shift across the political spectrum. Hanson argued that while the Democratic Party and elements of the cultural left had long embraced antisemitic tendencies, certain voices on the right were now joining in, leaving staunch support for Israel primarily in the hands of former President Donald Trump and the MAGA base. Hanson traced the roots of the problem to the political left, noting that during the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, and further intensified by diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, “they became anti-semitic.” In contrast, he emphasized, “It was the Republican party that stood up for Israel.”He expressed particular disappointment with figures once aligned with conservative or Republican circles who have recently voiced skepticism toward Israel. Citing Megyn Kelly as an example, Hanson recounted her public reflection: “I think I’ve been mistaken. And I might have been affected too much by people who were pro-Israel. And now I think we’ve been a little bit too hard on Islam and Netanyahu did this and Netanyahu did this.” Hanson grouped her alongside others including Steve Bannon, Candace Owens, and Tucker Carlson. Of Carlson, Hanson observed that the podcaster is “very informed” and “very bright,” yet still questions strong support for Israel despite knowing key historical threats. “He knows that Roth and Johnny said that Israel was a one bomb state. One bomb could kill all the Jews. He knows what Akmanagen Akminad [Ahmadinejad] said he wanted to wipe,” Hanson stated, adding pointedly, “Why would he say it would be helpful if Iran had a bomb?” Hanson noted the absence of forceful pushback within conservative circles. “There’s no party that says, ‘How dare you?’ They’re both in on it, their bases,” he said, referring to growing tolerance for anti-Israel rhetoric on both sides. Hanson contrasted this with the unexpected defenders of Jewish communities amid rising campus harassment and demonization: “The only people now in the United States who will stand up and say, ‘No more. We’re not going to let you demonize a whole people and push them around and rough them up on campus and call them all these names’ is who? It’s Donald Trump and the MAGA base, the irredeemables, the clingers. They’re the people who are still supporting Israel. They still support Jews and evangelicals.” Hanson explicitly rejected other factions as reliable allies. “It is not the Democratic Party. It is not the podcaster right base. It is not the DEI people. It is not the bicoastal leftwing elite teachers unions,” Hanson declared. To illustrate the sudden, widespread nature of the shift, he invoked pop-culture metaphors of infection and transformation. “It reminds me of all of these movies like The Invasion of the Body Snatchers or The Last of Us or The Walking Dead that certain people, you know, get infected and now they’re lost and they’re zombies and the other people, you never really know who’s a zombie until they turn,” he said. “Well, now they’re all turning and they’ve lost their minds.”

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

89,759 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Megyn Kelly’s Antithetical Turn on Islam: 8-Year Reversal Exposed! "Six months earlier she had delivered “a very good incisive critique” that focused not so much on “Israel versus Islam” but on Islam itself as “rightly suspicious..." Victor Davis Hanson highlighted a dramatic shift in the views of several prominent conservative voices on Jews and Israel. “If you took tapes of all these people,” he said, “and you look what Candace Owens was saying about Jews in Israel 8 years ago and now or Steve Bannon 8 years ago and now or Tucker Carlson 8 years ago and now,” their positions have changed radically. Hanson singled out Megyn Kelly, whom he likes “a lot,” noting that roughly six months earlier she had delivered “a very good incisive critique” that focused not so much on “Israel versus Islam” but on Islam itself as “rightly suspicious,” spotlighting “the seclusion of women and they couldn’t express themselves and the lack of free expression and rigidity.” Hanson observed that her current remarks stand “almost antithetical” to those earlier statements. He questioned what has driven “this radical change” and why there is “no push back.” Recalling the Iraq War era, Hanson remembered accusations that “the neocons planned it,” pointing to figures like Bill Kristol “in his glory days” and Richard Perle. While at the Naval Academy when the war broke out and supporting it, he was frequently asked if he was Jewish. “I said, ‘No, why?’” he recounted. “‘Well, the Jews support this.’ And I said, ‘Actually, Israel doesn’t.’” Hanson added that Israel had wanted the U.S. to stay out of Iraq and focus on Iran instead, “which might have been wiser, by the way.” Hanson warned that such sentiments have now become mainstreamed and are gaining momentum. Criticism has evolved into a “continuum” where it is acceptable to “damn” not only Israel but Jews, often masked by qualifiers such as “Well, I’m not against Jews. I’m just against Israel. I’m not against Israel. I’m just against Netanyahu.” Hanson found the surge in antisemitism on the left especially strange in the age of DEI. Hanson attributed it to “a combination of three factors that have coalesced in a synergy,” with DEI; Obama’s creation, serving as a key driver. It moved beyond the traditional Black-white historical problem of slavery and Jim Crow to a broader framework requiring, in his words, “a DNA test to verify this crackpot theory.” Under DEI logic, “67% of the country is white. Therefore they’re oppressors and they’re victimizers and the others are victims,” regardless of wealth, class, or actual circumstances. “It doesn’t matter,” he said. “You’re they are victims by the color of their skin… even if they’re whiter than the people on the other side by their ethnicity or the religion.”

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

82,954 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Victor Davis Hanson didn’t waste any time. He opened with a bombshell—and then spent the rest of the segment showing his work. He said the polls weren’t just off about Trump. They were being used to manipulate the public. For weeks, headlines have screamed that Trump is trailing by four or five points. But Hanson wasn’t buying it. He pointed to polling from Rasmussen and even Democrat Mark Penn that showed the race was actually neck and neck. Then he zeroed in on a New York Times poll. The headline claimed Trump was way behind, but only 37% of respondents had voted for him in 2024. That, Hanson said, made no sense. “Don’t you think it should have been—I don’t know—51, 49%?” he asked. It wasn’t an isolated problem. The Washington Post polled over 2,000 people—but only 840 were Trump voters. That’s not even close to a representative sample. Hanson laid out the pattern. “In 2016, the polls were completely wrong. In 2020, they overestimated Biden’s strength by 4 or 5 points. And even in 2024, NPR had Kamala Harris winning by four points.” He brought up one of the worst misses in recent memory: “The Des Moines Register had Iowa lost to Trump by three points. He won it by 12.” So what’s going on? Hanson didn’t chalk it up to bad methodology. He called it strategy. “The pollsters are trying to create momentum, fundraising, and jazz up opposition,” he said. These polls weren’t designed to measure public opinion—they were designed to shape it.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

355,527 просмотров • 1 год назад

Victor Davis Hanson drops a brutal metaphor that perfectly encapsulates the socialist takeover that is devouring the Democrat Party from within. He said Democrats created a monster they thought they could control. Now that monster is turning on them. HANSON: “Yeah, it’s the proverbial Dr. Frankenstein. He thought it was cute to make a monster, and the monster devoured them.” “They were the ones that destroyed the border. They’re the ones that talked about packing the court, getting rid of the Electoral College, defunding the police.” “And then these socialists came along and said, ‘That’s a good start, but you lost the Senate, you lost the House, you lost the presidency, you lost the Supreme Court…we’re going to take over and we’re going to go to the next level.’” “Thank you for the boost and the electrical shock to bring us to life…and now we don’t need you anymore.” “That’s their attitude.” HANSON: “Yeah, it’s the proverbial Dr. Frankenstein. Thought it was cute to make a monster, and the monster devoured them.” “They were the ones that destroyed the border, they’re the ones that talked about packing the court, getting rid of the Electoral College, defunding the police.” “And then these socialists came along and said that’s a good start, but you lost the Senate, you lost the House, you lost the presidency, you lost the Supreme Court… we’re going to take over and we’re going to go to the next level.” “Thank you for the boost and the electrical shock to bring us to life, and now we don’t need you anymore. That’s their attitude.”

Overton

21,856 просмотров • 5 дней назад