Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

There was a time when Canada had it all: freedom, democracy, bountiful resources, and safe communities. However now it's become a place that would be unrecognizable to the previous generations that helped build it. The good news is that we can have that Canadian dream once again. Will you...

16,552 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Western Canadian Girl
Western Canadian Girlvor 1 Jahr

Not much hope left if Ontario and Kaybec keep messing things up for the rest of us

Profilbild von David McGown
David McGownvor 1 Jahr

Stephanie, don’t know where you live, but my Canada has freedom, democracy, bountiful resources and safe communities. Not without challenges. But don’t tell me please that we don’t have the Canadian dream today.

Profilbild von Jeff
Jeffvor 1 Jahr

Alberta and Saskatchewan is leaving Canada soon. Rest of Canada can go to hell!

Profilbild von I Love Tea
I Love Teavor 1 Jahr

Nope. I’ve given up on Canada. The damage is irreparable. I’m now fighting for #AlbertaIndependence.

Profilbild von Nana0000
Nana0000vor 1 Jahr

Prayers it’s sooner than later. Carney hellbent on our complete destruction

Profilbild von Brenda L White
Brenda L Whitevor 1 Jahr

I remember the 100th anniversary - it was a time of joy and youth, freedom, celebration in our little park beside the house (no one said back then - you cannot do that). Safety in our streets would indeed be a wonderful thing again.

Profilbild von Geraldine 🍁
Geraldine 🍁vor 1 Jahr

Happy Canada Day Stephanie ♥️

Profilbild von Mikie66
Mikie66vor 1 Jahr

My Grandfather who fought in WW II would not be happy.

Profilbild von Sir Newton
Sir Newtonvor 1 Jahr

Only western GenXers know how good it once was !

Profilbild von Brander 🇺🇸
Brander 🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

Agree. I remember how it used to be.

Ähnliche Videos

🔥 Confirmation: UAPDA to be Reintroduced 🔥 Rounds: "I've been informed that Senator Schumer would like to partner once again, and that we would offer it again this year in the [NDAA]. I have no objections to submitting the legislation in its current form, but I would also work with my House counterparts to allay any concerns." Ross Coulthart: "Are we going to see a reintroduction of the UAP Disclosure Act? Are you going to try and get it through the Congress once again this year?" Senator Mike Rounds: "I've been informed that Senator Schumer would like to partner once again, and that we would offer it again this year in the National Defense Authorization Act, which we'll begin working on here in the next few weeks. So the answer is yes, we intend to move forward once again. "And we modeled this originally after the Kennedy assassination reports and the committee that was established to release the timely information that we had available. But to make a decision on when to release information based on its not only its need, but its appropriateness. We thought the same type of approach that successfully released a huge amount of information on the Kennedy assassination would be the appropriate way to look at any information that was available on the issue of what was at that time, UFOs." Ross: "Perhaps the most significant thing about that original legislation was that, as well as it being an incredible 64 pages of proposed UAP disclosure legislation, it was an incredibly powerful piece of legislation, if it had gone through in the form, in the original form that was proposed. It mentioned Non-Human Intelligence - NHI - 24 times. It's a very bold statement - isn't it - by the Senate and by the Congress, of intention. You seem to be suggesting there, that there is a there, there to be found." Rounds: "You know, our intent was to make sure that there wasn't an assumption by folks who were following it that we were trying to hide anything. And our goal was to say, look, if there is any of this, which, you know, a lot of folks out there have questioned whether or not, after all these years, there was contact that we had with entities, intelligence that was not of this Earth and so forth, we just thought, rather than beating around the bush, let's just say, 'Look, if there's any of that out there, then let's disclose it. Let's make that available, or at least collect it. And then at some point, based upon a commission's review of it, to determine any national security concerns, to be able to share that information at the appropriate time.' It was not put in there because of any evidence that I had, or that I believe Senator Schumer had, that would suggest that we had a smoking gun. But rather, let's have clarity. Let's lay this thing out and make sure that the American public would know, that if there was such information that existed, we were directing that it be preserved and then it be delivered for appropriate persons and for review by this select committee." Ross: "Senator, would you like to see the original legislation passed in its original, proposed form? Is that a possibility, or are you looking at changing that legislation in any way from what was originally proposed, I think in July 2023?" Rounds:"I have no objections to submitting the legislation in its current form, but I would also work with my House counterparts to allay any concerns that they may have. And once again, look, my background on this is working on the Senate Intel Committee, the Intelligence Committee, but also on the Armed Services Committee. And I can tell you that that we do a lot of research, and we've got advanced projects going on all the time,. And what we didn't want to have happen was a demand for exposure on weapon-systems capabilities and so forth, that that might otherwise be found or reported out or disclosed in an inappropriate way. "Many people have talked now about the development of stealth, and I think now there's more and more discussion on the fact that there were some plans out there that allowed some of these stealth weapons to be unidentified for an extended period of time, on purpose. And the reason for it was, is because for national-defense purposes. In those particular cases where we have items out there that might very well be ours, we may very well not wanna be able...we may not wanna disclose that information, and it's appropriate to keep it private. The same if we know of other weapon systems by other countries. We may not want to disclose it, but we wanted a place where it could at least be collected, and an independent organization could look at it and be able to disclose that which was not subject to. National Defense concerns." (We're not asking for OUR secret tech to be revealed and I'm tired of hearing that. However, what if there's a technological breakthrough that will make our lives better on this planet and be better for the environment? Then what?)

Joe Murgia

109,300 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"'Caddyshack' (1980) was a little disappointing when it came out and now it's just a miraculous irony that people have continued to embrace the film and love it." --- Harold Ramis Full Excerpt: "The fact that people are still watching 'Caddyshack' (1980) & showing it to their kids, their grandchildren and still talking about it amazes me because when the movie came out, we actually were a little disappointed because Doug Kenney and I had just done 'Animal House' (1978) and we were so arrogant at the time as we were writing 'Animal House' with Chris Miller. We would actually think to ourselves that it would be the most successful comedy of all time; which it turned out to be . It was like a grandiose delusion that was turned real on us. So then we thought well now we'll do 'Caddyshack' & that it will be the most successful comedy ever. we will do better than 'Animal House' and it didn't. It did half as well and a lot of critics scorned us. The New York Times called it an "amiable mess" which I kind of liked. I thought "all right I'll take amiable and the mess I can live with." So, it was a little disappointing when it came out and now it's just a miraculous irony that people have continued to embrace the film and love it. I once recognized the strange fact that when people used to read TV Guide and they would rate movies. 'Caddyshack' was a two-star movie for the first 10 years. Then at some point I noticed that it got a third star in the same publication and I thought "maybe it's like wine, the longer you keep it in, it just gets a little better."" (Harold Ramis' interview to AFI, 2009)

DepressedBergman

42,447 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten