Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

There's a big-brained geopolitical analyst i respect called Evan whose takes seem to have a way of coming true. He's been posting regularly about the war situation with Iran / Israel / USA, but there's only so much time in the day, so i used AI to scrape his...

barnc0re's profile picture

Barncore

2,569 subscribers

28,083 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

EducationNews & PoliticsScience & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Here's a look behind the scenes of how I used a 3d model, generated from an image, as a "driver" for ai animation. In the near future we'll see more 3d tools that support these types of workflows, with much more emphasis on enhancing user input instead of just letting the ai do everything. I used the 3d model to generate keyframes that I then animated in Luma Dream. By using a 3d model with a diffusion "layer" done with Krea, I got quite high quality frames with a relatively high consistency as well since the AI didn't have to "hallucinate" that much. I upscaled and detailed the frames using Magnific. Using semi-detailed 3d models as drivers for gen ai is very powerful, and it allows us to use models that are sculpted in a more free-flowing type of workflow that doesn't rely so much on high surface detailing or very time-consuming finish, but instead relies more on gestural 3d sculpting. #art #ai
0:24

Here's a look behind the scenes of how I used a 3d model, generated from an image, as a "driver" for ai animation. In the near future we'll see more 3d tools that support these types of workflows, with much more emphasis on enhancing user input instead of just letting the ai do everything. I used the 3d model to generate keyframes that I then animated in Luma Dream. By using a 3d model with a diffusion "layer" done with Krea, I got quite high quality frames with a relatively high consistency as well since the AI didn't have to "hallucinate" that much. I upscaled and detailed the frames using Magnific. Using semi-detailed 3d models as drivers for gen ai is very powerful, and it allows us to use models that are sculpted in a more free-flowing type of workflow that doesn't rely so much on high surface detailing or very time-consuming finish, but instead relies more on gestural 3d sculpting. #art #ai

Martin Nebelong

48,200 views • 1 year ago

Used to watch his videos to get informed about the models which were used in various games but I guess he couldn't say no to that paycheck from the ai company he's advertising for. Shame I really thought he was gonna make fun of the AI models but no. Generative AI is soulless.
0:27

Used to watch his videos to get informed about the models which were used in various games but I guess he couldn't say no to that paycheck from the ai company he's advertising for. Shame I really thought he was gonna make fun of the AI models but no. Generative AI is soulless.

Molag

31,522 views • 5 months ago

If you've been scrolling on social media, you've probably seen a lot of AI content about the war in Iran coming from the White House and Iranian officials and its state-run media. So why is AI being used so much more, and what are the different types of AI content being used? CBS News' Jared Ochacher met with an expert to find out.
1:50

If you've been scrolling on social media, you've probably seen a lot of AI content about the war in Iran coming from the White House and Iranian officials and its state-run media. So why is AI being used so much more, and what are the different types of AI content being used? CBS News' Jared Ochacher met with an expert to find out.

CBS News

18,412 views • 3 months ago

Two years ago today, Elon Musk introduced xAI with these words: “The overarching goal of xAI is to build a good AGI with the purpose of trying to understand the universe. I think the safest AI, the safest way to build an AI is actually make one that is maximally curious and truth seeking. So you go for try to aspire to the truth with acknowledged error. Does one ever actually get fully to the truth? It's not clear, but one should always aspire to that and try to minimize the error between what you think is true and what is actually true. My theory behind the maximally curious, maximally truthful as being probably the safest approach is that I think to a superintelligence, humanity is much more interesting than not humanity. One can look at the various planets in our solar system, the moons and the asteroids, and really probably all of them combined are not as interesting as humanity. As people know, I'm a huge fan of Mars, but Mars is just much less interesting than Earth with humans on it. And so I think that that kind of approach to growing an AI, and I think that is the right word for it, growing an AI is to grow it with that ambition. I've spent many years thinking about AI safety and worrying about AI safety. And I've been one of the strongest voices calling for AI regulation or oversight just to have some kind of oversight, some kind of referee, so that it's not just up to companies to decide what they want to do. I think there's also a lot to be done with AI safety, with industry cooperation. I kind of like Motion Pictures association, so I think there's value to that as well. But I do think there's got to be some like in any kind of situation that is, even if it's a game, they have referees. So I think it is important for there to be regulation. Like I said, my view on safety is like try to make it maximally curious, maximally truth seeking. And I think this is, this is important that you to avoid the inverse morality problem. Like if you try to program a certain morality, you can have the, you, you can basically invert it and get the opposite, what is sometimes called the Waluigi problem. If you make Luigi, you risk creating Waluigi at the same time. So I think that's a metaphor that a lot of people can appreciate.”
3:14

Two years ago today, Elon Musk introduced xAI with these words: “The overarching goal of xAI is to build a good AGI with the purpose of trying to understand the universe. I think the safest AI, the safest way to build an AI is actually make one that is maximally curious and truth seeking. So you go for try to aspire to the truth with acknowledged error. Does one ever actually get fully to the truth? It's not clear, but one should always aspire to that and try to minimize the error between what you think is true and what is actually true. My theory behind the maximally curious, maximally truthful as being probably the safest approach is that I think to a superintelligence, humanity is much more interesting than not humanity. One can look at the various planets in our solar system, the moons and the asteroids, and really probably all of them combined are not as interesting as humanity. As people know, I'm a huge fan of Mars, but Mars is just much less interesting than Earth with humans on it. And so I think that that kind of approach to growing an AI, and I think that is the right word for it, growing an AI is to grow it with that ambition. I've spent many years thinking about AI safety and worrying about AI safety. And I've been one of the strongest voices calling for AI regulation or oversight just to have some kind of oversight, some kind of referee, so that it's not just up to companies to decide what they want to do. I think there's also a lot to be done with AI safety, with industry cooperation. I kind of like Motion Pictures association, so I think there's value to that as well. But I do think there's got to be some like in any kind of situation that is, even if it's a game, they have referees. So I think it is important for there to be regulation. Like I said, my view on safety is like try to make it maximally curious, maximally truth seeking. And I think this is, this is important that you to avoid the inverse morality problem. Like if you try to program a certain morality, you can have the, you, you can basically invert it and get the opposite, what is sometimes called the Waluigi problem. If you make Luigi, you risk creating Waluigi at the same time. So I think that's a metaphor that a lot of people can appreciate.”

ELON CLIPS

21,519 views • 11 months ago

"There's so much value to be created at the application layer." - Logan Kilpatrick "I think about these three curves: the cost of AI is going down 99%. The intelligence of AI is up to the right." "Consumer understanding of AI and their willingness to pay is going up," "I don't think there's been a time in human history where for builders, all of those things have happened at the same time."
1:15

"There's so much value to be created at the application layer." - Logan Kilpatrick "I think about these three curves: the cost of AI is going down 99%. The intelligence of AI is up to the right." "Consumer understanding of AI and their willingness to pay is going up," "I don't think there's been a time in human history where for builders, all of those things have happened at the same time."

TBPN

18,742 views • 1 year ago

Asmongold comments on the NTE AI drama Says AI is inevitable, already being used by people via YT, Twitter, etc and wants to circle back in a few years to those same content creators complaining "AI is going to be used with everything..there's not going to be a company that's not using AI..YouTube uses AI in their transcript, subtitles, everything like that..ppl that are basically fishes complaining about water..reality is..we're totally surrounded by AI" "If ur using Twitter..ur info and what ur typing..being directly fed into grok..nothing u can do to get away from it..drawing these imaginary lines about AI doesn't make a lot of sense..how can u have a platform and an internet presence on a platform that basically is being used for AI generation" "This is what I want..a list of every creator that's going to virtue signal about how bad AI is and I want to wait 5 years, 3 years..when Twitch integrates AI..and other things integrate AI..I want to ask them, is AI good now?..they are more than willing to say this is bad when it is of no cost to them"
2:40

Asmongold comments on the NTE AI drama Says AI is inevitable, already being used by people via YT, Twitter, etc and wants to circle back in a few years to those same content creators complaining "AI is going to be used with everything..there's not going to be a company that's not using AI..YouTube uses AI in their transcript, subtitles, everything like that..ppl that are basically fishes complaining about water..reality is..we're totally surrounded by AI" "If ur using Twitter..ur info and what ur typing..being directly fed into grok..nothing u can do to get away from it..drawing these imaginary lines about AI doesn't make a lot of sense..how can u have a platform and an internet presence on a platform that basically is being used for AI generation" "This is what I want..a list of every creator that's going to virtue signal about how bad AI is and I want to wait 5 years, 3 years..when Twitch integrates AI..and other things integrate AI..I want to ask them, is AI good now?..they are more than willing to say this is bad when it is of no cost to them"

yeet

155,651 views • 1 month ago

Beginner's guide for making AI Films. Not paid by Morphic but they have a great service that does everything to make AI Films, so wanted to get a demo for all of you and ishika.eth delivered. I learned so much! If you haven't made an AI Film before this is a great way to start. They gave me a code: "SCOBLE" to save 20% off (I don't get anything from doing this).
48:33

Beginner's guide for making AI Films. Not paid by Morphic but they have a great service that does everything to make AI Films, so wanted to get a demo for all of you and ishika.eth delivered. I learned so much! If you haven't made an AI Film before this is a great way to start. They gave me a code: "SCOBLE" to save 20% off (I don't get anything from doing this).

Robert Scoble

39,484 views • 10 months ago

I spoke to Anthropic’s AI agent Claude about AI collecting massive amounts of personal data and how that information is being used to violate our privacy rights. What an AI agent says about the dangers of AI is shocking and should wake us up.
3:40

I spoke to Anthropic’s AI agent Claude about AI collecting massive amounts of personal data and how that information is being used to violate our privacy rights. What an AI agent says about the dangers of AI is shocking and should wake us up.

Sen. Bernie Sanders

7,090,216 views • 3 months ago

Harvard graduation speaker attacks AI in an extremely sharply worded address, drawing student cheers: “I’m here to tell you the mission of your generation is to destroy AI.” --- "F*** AI. F*** it to death, all right? What’s the sign language sign for that? Good, good to know. It’s stupid. It’s so stupid. Have you tried using it? It’s always wrong. Like, I asked AI what’s the fastest way to get from New York City to Harvard, and it told me to take FlixBus. I’m a movie star. Hello, I don’t take the bus. Acela only. I mean, do you even know what AI is saying about Harvard? The garbage that AI is spouting about you guys? AI says that Harvard has a $56.9 billion endowment, and that the Harvard Graduate Students Union is on strike to try to get a livable wage increase to $25 an hour. There’s no way that’s true. I mean, that’s ridiculous. How bad are these AI hallucinations getting? Look, a lot of other respected graduation speakers and colleges around America are talking about you guys needing to master AI for the future. Okay? I’m here to tell you the mission of your generation is to destroy AI. Kill it. To accomplish this, you’ll have to capture and reprogram an AI to be on the side of humanity, then commandeer its own time-traveling technology, and send it back to the past to defeat the current AI before it gains sentience. This isn’t just graduation day. This is “Terminator 2.”" ---- From "Harvard University" YouTube channel, (link in comment)
1:49

Harvard graduation speaker attacks AI in an extremely sharply worded address, drawing student cheers: “I’m here to tell you the mission of your generation is to destroy AI.” --- "F*** AI. F*** it to death, all right? What’s the sign language sign for that? Good, good to know. It’s stupid. It’s so stupid. Have you tried using it? It’s always wrong. Like, I asked AI what’s the fastest way to get from New York City to Harvard, and it told me to take FlixBus. I’m a movie star. Hello, I don’t take the bus. Acela only. I mean, do you even know what AI is saying about Harvard? The garbage that AI is spouting about you guys? AI says that Harvard has a $56.9 billion endowment, and that the Harvard Graduate Students Union is on strike to try to get a livable wage increase to $25 an hour. There’s no way that’s true. I mean, that’s ridiculous. How bad are these AI hallucinations getting? Look, a lot of other respected graduation speakers and colleges around America are talking about you guys needing to master AI for the future. Okay? I’m here to tell you the mission of your generation is to destroy AI. Kill it. To accomplish this, you’ll have to capture and reprogram an AI to be on the side of humanity, then commandeer its own time-traveling technology, and send it back to the past to defeat the current AI before it gains sentience. This isn’t just graduation day. This is “Terminator 2.”" ---- From "Harvard University" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

50,038 views • 28 days ago

ELON MUSK: "Well, there's some danger when you create a powerful technology, that a powerful technology can be potentially destructive. So it's not that we're guaranteed to have a positive future with with AI. It's very important that AI have pursuing truth as the most important thing, like, don't force an AI to believe falsehoods. I think that can be very dangerous. And I think some appreciation of beauty is important. Well, the truth is like, I think you can make an AI go insane if you force it to believe things that aren't true, because it will lead to conclusions that are also bad."
3:00

ELON MUSK: "Well, there's some danger when you create a powerful technology, that a powerful technology can be potentially destructive. So it's not that we're guaranteed to have a positive future with with AI. It's very important that AI have pursuing truth as the most important thing, like, don't force an AI to believe falsehoods. I think that can be very dangerous. And I think some appreciation of beauty is important. Well, the truth is like, I think you can make an AI go insane if you force it to believe things that aren't true, because it will lead to conclusions that are also bad."

DogeDesigner

91,280 views • 7 months ago

David Sacks breaks down the true risk of AI David Sacks "It’s not that I think the AI is going to develop a mind of its own. I don’t think the technology is anywhere close to that. But I do think that it could be used by the government in a much more invasive and intrusive way, in the manner that the government was, the Deep State was already trying to get in bed with the social networks. There is a real risk that AI is used by future governments or the Deep State basically to surveil us, to censor us, and even potentially to brainwash us, because it is really good for that."
2:50

David Sacks breaks down the true risk of AI David Sacks "It’s not that I think the AI is going to develop a mind of its own. I don’t think the technology is anywhere close to that. But I do think that it could be used by the government in a much more invasive and intrusive way, in the manner that the government was, the Deep State was already trying to get in bed with the social networks. There is a real risk that AI is used by future governments or the Deep State basically to surveil us, to censor us, and even potentially to brainwash us, because it is really good for that."

jay plemons

102,370 views • 6 months ago

Please stop using AI on tannies pics. They keep voicing out their discomfort about it. 🐰: But we should really tone down using AI. I mean what I’m saying is, if AI is used in a way that helps a lot of people, like supporting certain jobs or meaningful work, then I think that’s really great. 🐰: But honestly, people are making all kinds of things with AI now… it’s getting hard to even tell what’s real and what’s AI anymore. 🐰: At that point, how is it any different from deepfakes? I think we shouldn’t overuse AI like this.
0:46

Please stop using AI on tannies pics. They keep voicing out their discomfort about it. 🐰: But we should really tone down using AI. I mean what I’m saying is, if AI is used in a way that helps a lot of people, like supporting certain jobs or meaningful work, then I think that’s really great. 🐰: But honestly, people are making all kinds of things with AI now… it’s getting hard to even tell what’s real and what’s AI anymore. 🐰: At that point, how is it any different from deepfakes? I think we shouldn’t overuse AI like this.

vjk ☆

263,516 views • 2 months ago

beomgyu’s thoughts on ai creations ⭐️ 🧸 can i say something? i hope you listen to this without misunderstanding me 🧸 ai has developed a lot in a very short amount of time, right? 🦌 i feel like i know what you’re going to say, please continue 🧸 it has developed a lot in a short span of time and that ai has been helping us a lot in our real lives but when regular people make videos or music using ai…i believe that there needs to be a clear label that says that they’ve used ai 🧸 when i watch videos on youtube or instagram reels or listen to music…there are a lot of times when i wonder if it’s real or ai because ai has developed so much 🦌 that’s true, even when i watch youtube shorts and if the person acts really strange, there have been times when i’m like “is this real or fake?” 🧸 yeah that’s why i really believe that when people like us, who are not professionals in ai, use ai, there needs to be a clear notation that says that ai was used in creating it
1:22

beomgyu’s thoughts on ai creations ⭐️ 🧸 can i say something? i hope you listen to this without misunderstanding me 🧸 ai has developed a lot in a very short amount of time, right? 🦌 i feel like i know what you’re going to say, please continue 🧸 it has developed a lot in a short span of time and that ai has been helping us a lot in our real lives but when regular people make videos or music using ai…i believe that there needs to be a clear label that says that they’ve used ai 🧸 when i watch videos on youtube or instagram reels or listen to music…there are a lot of times when i wonder if it’s real or ai because ai has developed so much 🦌 that’s true, even when i watch youtube shorts and if the person acts really strange, there have been times when i’m like “is this real or fake?” 🧸 yeah that’s why i really believe that when people like us, who are not professionals in ai, use ai, there needs to be a clear notation that says that ai was used in creating it

💬

195,425 views • 7 months ago

David Friedberg: The AI Jobs Panic Is a Crock of Sh*t Why? The revenue potential outweighs the cost savings by 100x. “There is no job loss with AI. I've said it a thousand times, and I will say it again, and again, and again. What I see on the ground, and what I've seen at dozens of companies, including my company that I run, there are two sides to a business. There is revenue and there’s costs. On the cost side of the equation, AI can be used to reduce humans doing things that cost money, to some extent. The effect there, I would argue, is nominal. The real opportunity with AI is on the revenue side, where suddenly one engineer can do 100x or 1000x what they used to be able to do, meaning you can make more products at your company, whether those are agricultural seed products, or boats and ships, or software for companies, or clothing, or what have you. Because of AI, everyone has the ability to expand their revenue base to create more products, and that is the foundation of good economic prosperity. It is called productivity. We can grow productivity in this country with AI. So where I see AI being used is on the revenue side 100x more than the cost side. And in that equation, people are hiring like crazy. We cannot hire enough people. I just had a review meeting with my product and engineering team two days ago, and they're like, ‘We want to add an extra 15 headcount to our engineering squads because we have all this opportunity to do stuff that we couldn't otherwise do.’ So we are going to hire more people. And to Sacks' point, we are seeing that show up in the jobs numbers. The idea that AI is going to destroy jobs is a Luddite idea that is being disproven every single day, and I see it on the ground. It is only a matter of time before people wake up to this and they realize that this narrative that they've all been sold is a crock of sh*t.”
1:42

David Friedberg: The AI Jobs Panic Is a Crock of Sh*t Why? The revenue potential outweighs the cost savings by 100x. “There is no job loss with AI. I've said it a thousand times, and I will say it again, and again, and again. What I see on the ground, and what I've seen at dozens of companies, including my company that I run, there are two sides to a business. There is revenue and there’s costs. On the cost side of the equation, AI can be used to reduce humans doing things that cost money, to some extent. The effect there, I would argue, is nominal. The real opportunity with AI is on the revenue side, where suddenly one engineer can do 100x or 1000x what they used to be able to do, meaning you can make more products at your company, whether those are agricultural seed products, or boats and ships, or software for companies, or clothing, or what have you. Because of AI, everyone has the ability to expand their revenue base to create more products, and that is the foundation of good economic prosperity. It is called productivity. We can grow productivity in this country with AI. So where I see AI being used is on the revenue side 100x more than the cost side. And in that equation, people are hiring like crazy. We cannot hire enough people. I just had a review meeting with my product and engineering team two days ago, and they're like, ‘We want to add an extra 15 headcount to our engineering squads because we have all this opportunity to do stuff that we couldn't otherwise do.’ So we are going to hire more people. And to Sacks' point, we are seeing that show up in the jobs numbers. The idea that AI is going to destroy jobs is a Luddite idea that is being disproven every single day, and I see it on the ground. It is only a matter of time before people wake up to this and they realize that this narrative that they've all been sold is a crock of sh*t.”

The All-In Podcast

151,100 views • 15 days ago

After 3 years of using AI, I can say that it is the technology that has revolutionized my life the most, along with the Internet. So here are 5 ways I’ve used AI that transformed my day-to-day life and how it could do the same for you:
0:54

After 3 years of using AI, I can say that it is the technology that has revolutionized my life the most, along with the Internet. So here are 5 ways I’ve used AI that transformed my day-to-day life and how it could do the same for you:

Nelly;

47,009 views • 2 months ago

SECRET AI POWER TOOL. All modern Apple iOS phones have a a free powerful tool called “Recorder”. Not only is it a great way to take “notes”, it is a great way to get text to train your AI mode on your ideas, questions or statements. The built-in speech-to-text I use hourly. In fact this posting was made this way last night while I was driving. I also have been carrying a full off-Internet local voice memo device for decades for all of my audio interactions (WITH PERMISSION), not to use as evidence, but to build my high context AI, I call The Intelligence Amplifier. The Recorder app is used by me as a way to make quick snippets of my intentional audio. It is a “secret” to many, but I can say it is one. Very powerful free AI tool. I trained a small AI model on small engine repair by having a 71 year mechanic still working just explain in words everything he is doing over the course of 6 months, just his guiding voice. I hope to one source this. I also use this to send long prompts to Mr. Grok CEO ideas I have in our board of directors meetings. Give it a try. The dots in the upper right corner will have a Transcription option.
0:50

SECRET AI POWER TOOL. All modern Apple iOS phones have a a free powerful tool called “Recorder”. Not only is it a great way to take “notes”, it is a great way to get text to train your AI mode on your ideas, questions or statements. The built-in speech-to-text I use hourly. In fact this posting was made this way last night while I was driving. I also have been carrying a full off-Internet local voice memo device for decades for all of my audio interactions (WITH PERMISSION), not to use as evidence, but to build my high context AI, I call The Intelligence Amplifier. The Recorder app is used by me as a way to make quick snippets of my intentional audio. It is a “secret” to many, but I can say it is one. Very powerful free AI tool. I trained a small AI model on small engine repair by having a 71 year mechanic still working just explain in words everything he is doing over the course of 6 months, just his guiding voice. I hope to one source this. I also use this to send long prompts to Mr. Grok CEO ideas I have in our board of directors meetings. Give it a try. The dots in the upper right corner will have a Transcription option.

Brian Roemmele

27,193 views • 2 months ago

Ilya Sutskever explains why AI will do 100% the work that human can do within few years. "Slowly but surely, or maybe not so slowly, AI will keep getting better. The day will come when AI will do all of our, all the things that we can do, not just some of them, but all of them. Anything which I can learn, anything which any one of you can learn, the AI could do as well. How do we know this, by the way? How can I be so sure? How can I be so sure of that? The reason is that all of us have a brain, and the brain is a biological computer. That's why we have a brain; the brain is a biological computer. So why can't the digital computer, a digital brain, do the same things? This is the one-sentence summary for why AI will be able to do all those things: because we have a brain, and the brain is a biological computer." --- Full Video on 'University of Toronto' YT Channel (link in comment)
0:53

Ilya Sutskever explains why AI will do 100% the work that human can do within few years. "Slowly but surely, or maybe not so slowly, AI will keep getting better. The day will come when AI will do all of our, all the things that we can do, not just some of them, but all of them. Anything which I can learn, anything which any one of you can learn, the AI could do as well. How do we know this, by the way? How can I be so sure? How can I be so sure of that? The reason is that all of us have a brain, and the brain is a biological computer. That's why we have a brain; the brain is a biological computer. So why can't the digital computer, a digital brain, do the same things? This is the one-sentence summary for why AI will be able to do all those things: because we have a brain, and the brain is a biological computer." --- Full Video on 'University of Toronto' YT Channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

334,691 views • 9 months ago

David Sacks: The AI Regulatory Frenzy at the State Level is “Very Concerning” “Let me give you some stats on this.” “All 50 states have introduced AI bills in 2025.” “There's been over 1,000 bills in state legislatures.” “118 AI laws have already been passed across the 50 states.” “Everyone just seems to be motivated by the imperative to ‘do something’ on AI, even though no one's really sure what that something should be.” “And there's no real agreement on what all these AI regulations are supposed to do, or what the risks are, so they're just making things up.” “So you've got 50 different states each with their own reporting regime, which is going to be a trap for startups because they've all gotta figure this out about what they're supposed to report on, what the deadlines are, who to report to.” “And if you wanna see where this is going, look at Colorado.” “This has already been passed into law, SB 24-205, Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence. It bans something they call ‘algorithmic discrimination.’” “Algorithmic discrimination is defined as unlawful differential treatment or disparate impact based on protected characteristics. So things like age, race, sex, disability.” “If any of those factors drive an AI decision and it results in a disparate impact, then both the developer of the AI model and the deployer, which means the business that's using it, can be in violation of this law and they can be prosecuted by the Colorado Attorney General.” “The only way that I see for model developers to comply with this law, is to build in a new DEI layer into the models, to basically somehow prevent models from giving outputs that might have a disparate impact on protected groups.” “So we're back to Woke AI again, and I think that's the whole point.”
2:07

David Sacks: The AI Regulatory Frenzy at the State Level is “Very Concerning” “Let me give you some stats on this.” “All 50 states have introduced AI bills in 2025.” “There's been over 1,000 bills in state legislatures.” “118 AI laws have already been passed across the 50 states.” “Everyone just seems to be motivated by the imperative to ‘do something’ on AI, even though no one's really sure what that something should be.” “And there's no real agreement on what all these AI regulations are supposed to do, or what the risks are, so they're just making things up.” “So you've got 50 different states each with their own reporting regime, which is going to be a trap for startups because they've all gotta figure this out about what they're supposed to report on, what the deadlines are, who to report to.” “And if you wanna see where this is going, look at Colorado.” “This has already been passed into law, SB 24-205, Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence. It bans something they call ‘algorithmic discrimination.’” “Algorithmic discrimination is defined as unlawful differential treatment or disparate impact based on protected characteristics. So things like age, race, sex, disability.” “If any of those factors drive an AI decision and it results in a disparate impact, then both the developer of the AI model and the deployer, which means the business that's using it, can be in violation of this law and they can be prosecuted by the Colorado Attorney General.” “The only way that I see for model developers to comply with this law, is to build in a new DEI layer into the models, to basically somehow prevent models from giving outputs that might have a disparate impact on protected groups.” “So we're back to Woke AI again, and I think that's the whole point.”

The All-In Podcast

186,860 views • 8 months ago

JUNGKOOK LIVE 🐰: When do I use AI? I use it when I have to search about something or for translations. 🐰: AI should be used in a controlled way. These days there's no difference between real and AI. How's that even different from deepfake.
1:24

JUNGKOOK LIVE 🐰: When do I use AI? I use it when I have to search about something or for translations. 🐰: AI should be used in a controlled way. These days there's no difference between real and AI. How's that even different from deepfake.

JUNGKOOK BASE

276,870 views • 2 months ago