Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

There’s something wrong with the DLSS implementation in #007FirstLight. In Quality mode, the game defaults to Preset K, and the internal resolution looks correct. but for some reason, DLSS is noticeably slower than FSR 3 and delivers much smaller performance gains than expected.

BenchmarKing

5,957 subscribers

31,789 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I've tested several scenes on the 3060 Ti, and DLSS is still nowhere near FSR 3 in terms of performance. What's even weirder is that DLSS Quality seems to handle certain elements better than DLAA. that's a pretty clear sign that something is wrong. #007FirstLight

I've tested several scenes on the 3060 Ti, and DLSS is still nowhere near FSR 3 in terms of performance. What's even weirder is that DLSS Quality seems to handle certain elements better than DLAA. that's a pretty clear sign that something is wrong. #007FirstLight

BenchmarKing

60,380 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

DLSS 4.5 performance cost on the RTX 4070 Super, tested in #TheLastOfUs, #ArcRaiders, and #RedDeadRedemption2 at 2160p (4K). This time, I replaced the games default CNN models with native 4K to show how the DLSS Transformer model compares against native TAA / TSR. I also included a comparison between the new presets using Performance mode and Preset K in Quality mode. The Last of Us Part I Performance mode – Native (TAA) → Transformer Preset K: ~59% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~13% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~7% hit Quality mode – Native (TAA) → Transformer Preset K: ~35% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~23% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~17% hit Preset K Quality mode vs Preset L & M Performance mode – Preset K → Preset L: ~5% gain – Preset K → Preset M: ~13% gain Arc Raiders Performance mode – Native (TSR) → Transformer Preset K: ~80% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~11% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~7% hit Quality mode – Native (TSR) → Transformer Preset K: ~47% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~21% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~16% hit Preset K Quality mode vs Preset L & M Performance mode – Preset K → Preset L: ~5% gain – Preset K → Preset M: ~13% gain Red Dead Redemption 2 Performance mode – Native (TAA) → Transformer Preset K: ~15% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~11% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~4% hit Preset K Quality mode vs Preset L & M Performance mode – Preset K → Preset L: ~0% gain – Preset K → Preset M: ~6% gain At 4K, The performance cost of the new presets is more significant than at 1440p, especially in Quality mode, which to be fair, doesn’t really make much sense to use at this resolution on a mid range GPU even with Preset K. In most cases, Preset L and M offer good image quality at 4K in Performance Mode. But right now, I think the biggest and most noticeable visual issue with these new presets is the oversharpening in some games, like The Last of Us. This problem is even more obvious at this resolution especially with Preset M.

DLSS 4.5 performance cost on the RTX 4070 Super, tested in #TheLastOfUs, #ArcRaiders, and #RedDeadRedemption2 at 2160p (4K). This time, I replaced the games default CNN models with native 4K to show how the DLSS Transformer model compares against native TAA / TSR. I also included a comparison between the new presets using Performance mode and Preset K in Quality mode. The Last of Us Part I Performance mode – Native (TAA) → Transformer Preset K: ~59% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~13% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~7% hit Quality mode – Native (TAA) → Transformer Preset K: ~35% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~23% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~17% hit Preset K Quality mode vs Preset L & M Performance mode – Preset K → Preset L: ~5% gain – Preset K → Preset M: ~13% gain Arc Raiders Performance mode – Native (TSR) → Transformer Preset K: ~80% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~11% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~7% hit Quality mode – Native (TSR) → Transformer Preset K: ~47% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~21% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~16% hit Preset K Quality mode vs Preset L & M Performance mode – Preset K → Preset L: ~5% gain – Preset K → Preset M: ~13% gain Red Dead Redemption 2 Performance mode – Native (TAA) → Transformer Preset K: ~15% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~11% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~4% hit Preset K Quality mode vs Preset L & M Performance mode – Preset K → Preset L: ~0% gain – Preset K → Preset M: ~6% gain At 4K, The performance cost of the new presets is more significant than at 1440p, especially in Quality mode, which to be fair, doesn’t really make much sense to use at this resolution on a mid range GPU even with Preset K. In most cases, Preset L and M offer good image quality at 4K in Performance Mode. But right now, I think the biggest and most noticeable visual issue with these new presets is the oversharpening in some games, like The Last of Us. This problem is even more obvious at this resolution especially with Preset M.

BenchmarKing

31,003 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

DLSS 4 Performance preset looks better than DLSS 3.8's Quality. The upgrade we all got is really nuts. This is Avowed on Performance mode with every setting maxed + ray tracing. Solid 120+ frames aside from occasional stuttering and it's gorgeous. MAGIC!

DLSS 4 Performance preset looks better than DLSS 3.8's Quality. The upgrade we all got is really nuts. This is Avowed on Performance mode with every setting maxed + ray tracing. Solid 120+ frames aside from occasional stuttering and it's gorgeous. MAGIC!

Hutch

11,363 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

DLSS 4.5 performance cost on the RTX 4070 Super, tested in #TheLastOfUs, #ArcRaiders, and #RedDeadRedemption2 at 1440p. I added Red Dead Redemption 2 since it’s one of the cases where the new presets really shine, especially in terms of motion clarity. It’s not easy to showcase the visual differences because of the capture, export, and the extra compression from Twitter and YouTube but If the difference isn’t obvious, focus on the tree at the end of the run. The Last of Us Part I Performance mode – CNN (Preset A) → Transformer Preset K: ~3% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~4% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~3% hit Balanced mode – CNN (Preset A) → Transformer Preset K: ~6% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~8% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~3% hit Quality mode – CNN (Preset A) → Transformer Preset K: ~4% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~11% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~6% hit Arc Raiders Performance mode – CNN (Preset E) → Transformer Preset K: ~4% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~8% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~2% hit Balanced mode – CNN (Preset E) → Transformer Preset K: ~5% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~11% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~4% hit Quality mode – CNN (Preset E) → Transformer Preset K: ~4% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~13% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~8% hit Red Dead Redemption 2 Quality mode – CNN (DLSS 2) → Transformer Preset K: ~2% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~12% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~7% hit Unlike what we saw with the 3060 Ti, the performance hit on the 4070 Super is much smaller, and this is where the new presets start to make a lot more sense. The hit isn’t that large, and you’ll likely get better image quality compared to Preset K. But Is it always worth it? That largely depends on the game and the target resolution. Generally, I recommend trying the new presets and seeing for yourself, but do this only if you have an RTX 40/50 series GPU.

DLSS 4.5 performance cost on the RTX 4070 Super, tested in #TheLastOfUs, #ArcRaiders, and #RedDeadRedemption2 at 1440p. I added Red Dead Redemption 2 since it’s one of the cases where the new presets really shine, especially in terms of motion clarity. It’s not easy to showcase the visual differences because of the capture, export, and the extra compression from Twitter and YouTube but If the difference isn’t obvious, focus on the tree at the end of the run. The Last of Us Part I Performance mode – CNN (Preset A) → Transformer Preset K: ~3% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~4% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~3% hit Balanced mode – CNN (Preset A) → Transformer Preset K: ~6% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~8% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~3% hit Quality mode – CNN (Preset A) → Transformer Preset K: ~4% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~11% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~6% hit Arc Raiders Performance mode – CNN (Preset E) → Transformer Preset K: ~4% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~8% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~2% hit Balanced mode – CNN (Preset E) → Transformer Preset K: ~5% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~11% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~4% hit Quality mode – CNN (Preset E) → Transformer Preset K: ~4% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~13% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~8% hit Red Dead Redemption 2 Quality mode – CNN (DLSS 2) → Transformer Preset K: ~2% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~12% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~7% hit Unlike what we saw with the 3060 Ti, the performance hit on the 4070 Super is much smaller, and this is where the new presets start to make a lot more sense. The hit isn’t that large, and you’ll likely get better image quality compared to Preset K. But Is it always worth it? That largely depends on the game and the target resolution. Generally, I recommend trying the new presets and seeing for yourself, but do this only if you have an RTX 40/50 series GPU.

BenchmarKing

53,027 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

DLSS 4.5 performance cost on the RTX 3060 Ti, tested in #TheLastOfUs and #ArcRaiders at 1440p. The Last of Us Part I Performance mode – CNN (Preset A) → Transformer Preset K: ~9% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~16% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~10% hit Balanced mode – CNN (Preset A) → Transformer Preset K: ~9% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~23% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~14% hit Quality mode – CNN (Preset A) → Transformer Preset K: ~9% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~23% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~20% hit Arc Raiders Performance mode – CNN (Preset E) → Transformer Preset K: ~9% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~20% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~15% hit Balanced mode – CNN (Preset E) → Transformer Preset K: ~8% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~25% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~21% hit Quality mode – CNN (Preset E) → Transformer Preset K: ~7% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~28% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~25% hit Preset L and M are brutal on the 3060 Ti , which is expected since the 20/30 series GPUs lack native FP8 Tensor Core support, and the performance cost increases even further in Balanced and Quality modes. Visually, unlike the jump from the CNN model to the Transformer, I’m not seeing enough improvement to justify this massive performance hit. Most of the time it’s just a small sharpness boost (which can sometimes look overly sharp) and slightly reduced ghosting. On the flip side, the newer presets also introduce issues that Preset K doesn’t have (check the distant Salt Lake City sign in The last of Us comparison).

DLSS 4.5 performance cost on the RTX 3060 Ti, tested in #TheLastOfUs and #ArcRaiders at 1440p. The Last of Us Part I Performance mode – CNN (Preset A) → Transformer Preset K: ~9% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~16% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~10% hit Balanced mode – CNN (Preset A) → Transformer Preset K: ~9% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~23% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~14% hit Quality mode – CNN (Preset A) → Transformer Preset K: ~9% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~23% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~20% hit Arc Raiders Performance mode – CNN (Preset E) → Transformer Preset K: ~9% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~20% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~15% hit Balanced mode – CNN (Preset E) → Transformer Preset K: ~8% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~25% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~21% hit Quality mode – CNN (Preset E) → Transformer Preset K: ~7% cost – Preset K → Preset L: ~28% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~25% hit Preset L and M are brutal on the 3060 Ti , which is expected since the 20/30 series GPUs lack native FP8 Tensor Core support, and the performance cost increases even further in Balanced and Quality modes. Visually, unlike the jump from the CNN model to the Transformer, I’m not seeing enough improvement to justify this massive performance hit. Most of the time it’s just a small sharpness boost (which can sometimes look overly sharp) and slightly reduced ghosting. On the flip side, the newer presets also introduce issues that Preset K doesn’t have (check the distant Salt Lake City sign in The last of Us comparison).

BenchmarKing

138,748 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

For the people that didn't understand what I meant before when I said that TAA blur was basically gone when using DLSS 4 and wasn't only for Cyberpunk 2077, this is the difference in God of War, Native 1440P UW vs FSR 3.1 Quality vs DLSS 4 Quality. Both Native and FSR have the "Blur" in motion, while DLSS4 doesn't (not even mentioning the quality here). DLSS raised the bar here in terms of upscaling, even when just swapping dlls.

For the people that didn't understand what I meant before when I said that TAA blur was basically gone when using DLSS 4 and wasn't only for Cyberpunk 2077, this is the difference in God of War, Native 1440P UW vs FSR 3.1 Quality vs DLSS 4 Quality. Both Native and FSR have the "Blur" in motion, while DLSS4 doesn't (not even mentioning the quality here). DLSS raised the bar here in terms of upscaling, even when just swapping dlls.

Ancient Gameplays

29,078 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

There’s a major issue with DLSS 4.5 that I haven’t seen many people talk about. Any RT effect looks noticeably noisier and more flickery with DLSS 4.5 compared to DLSS 4. This applies across the board, from full path tracing to standard Ray Tracing and even software Lumen.

There’s a major issue with DLSS 4.5 that I haven’t seen many people talk about. Any RT effect looks noticeably noisier and more flickery with DLSS 4.5 compared to DLSS 4. This applies across the board, from full path tracing to standard Ray Tracing and even software Lumen.

BenchmarKing

39,839 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

One of the biggest visual upgrades with DLSS 4.5 is how it handles disocclusion. The new presets, even when upscaling from a lower internal resolution, do a better job reconstructing newly exposed/previously occluded objects and fine details compared to Preset K.

One of the biggest visual upgrades with DLSS 4.5 is how it handles disocclusion. The new presets, even when upscaling from a lower internal resolution, do a better job reconstructing newly exposed/previously occluded objects and fine details compared to Preset K.

BenchmarKing

53,633 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Best Settings for NTE !! > Use Maxed Settings ( Native FSR/DlSS ) > Use Quality FSR / DLSS for more performance Note - Reduce Render Distance , Foliage or Texture Mapping if you need more performance ! #NTE #Ntecreator

Best Settings for NTE !! > Use Maxed Settings ( Native FSR/DlSS ) > Use Quality FSR / DLSS for more performance Note - Reduce Render Distance , Foliage or Texture Mapping if you need more performance ! #NTE #Ntecreator

Kaito

65,003 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Here's a comparison between FSR 4 and Native TAA in The Last Of Us Part 2, a Game that supported FSR 4 day-one. As you can see in this comparison (Hopefully X compression hasn't ruined it) FSR 4 Performance Mode holds up extremely well. The second part of the Video showcases FSR 4 Balanced Mode. I've been playing this Game at 4K and switched between different FSR 4 Modes (Performance, Balanced, Quality and Native) and the differences are not noticeable at all except for the fact that FSR 4 Native AA looks miles better than Native TAA

Here's a comparison between FSR 4 and Native TAA in The Last Of Us Part 2, a Game that supported FSR 4 day-one. As you can see in this comparison (Hopefully X compression hasn't ruined it) FSR 4 Performance Mode holds up extremely well. The second part of the Video showcases FSR 4 Balanced Mode. I've been playing this Game at 4K and switched between different FSR 4 Modes (Performance, Balanced, Quality and Native) and the differences are not noticeable at all except for the fact that FSR 4 Native AA looks miles better than Native TAA

NikTek

39,200 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Best Optimized Settings for NTE , Tested More than 3 hours > FSR / DLSS Quality > or TAA 1.0 ( Rendering Scale ) #NTE #NteCreator

Best Optimized Settings for NTE , Tested More than 3 hours > FSR / DLSS Quality > or TAA 1.0 ( Rendering Scale ) #NTE #NteCreator

Kaito

59,467 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Samson launches April 8th with ray tracing and DLSS 4.5 Super Resolution to enhance image quality and performance. #RTXON →

Samson launches April 8th with ray tracing and DLSS 4.5 Super Resolution to enhance image quality and performance. #RTXON →

NVIDIA GeForce

40,166 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

FSR 4 Redstone VS DLSS 4.5 tested in Black Myth: Wukong at super-low resolutions In this comparison I've set the following settings: 720p output resolution and render scale at 50% (360p) for all the upscalers. I've also included other upscalers that the game offers like NXSR, TSR and FSR 3 so you can see how each one does its job at reconstructing the image. DLSS 4.5 definitely takes the cake here by showing the most pleasing image of them all, followed closely by FSR 4 Redstone. TSR also looks surprisingly good, however the edges around the character are much rougher.

FSR 4 Redstone VS DLSS 4.5 tested in Black Myth: Wukong at super-low resolutions In this comparison I've set the following settings: 720p output resolution and render scale at 50% (360p) for all the upscalers. I've also included other upscalers that the game offers like NXSR, TSR and FSR 3 so you can see how each one does its job at reconstructing the image. DLSS 4.5 definitely takes the cake here by showing the most pleasing image of them all, followed closely by FSR 4 Redstone. TSR also looks surprisingly good, however the edges around the character are much rougher.

NikTek

44,354 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

#PRAGMATA Demo. Ray Tracing Off vs On. Ray Tracing in this game is quite efficient and doesn’t cost much but at the same time its quality is not particularly high. At native 1440p, there is noticeable noise in RT reflections. The game could definitely benefit from additional RT quality settings, or support for DLSS Ray Reconstruction and FSR Ray Regeneration.

#PRAGMATA Demo. Ray Tracing Off vs On. Ray Tracing in this game is quite efficient and doesn’t cost much but at the same time its quality is not particularly high. At native 1440p, there is noticeable noise in RT reflections. The game could definitely benefit from additional RT quality settings, or support for DLSS Ray Reconstruction and FSR Ray Regeneration.

BenchmarKing

194,710 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Targeting 9x resolution upscaling, DLSS 4.5 Preset L is Nvidia's most advanced transformer model - so how much does it cost computationally, what are the quality wins vs other models and how does 720p to 4K and 480p (!) to 1440p look?

Targeting 9x resolution upscaling, DLSS 4.5 Preset L is Nvidia's most advanced transformer model - so how much does it cost computationally, what are the quality wins vs other models and how does 720p to 4K and 480p (!) to 1440p look?

Digital Foundry

42,692 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The GeForce RTX 4060 with the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture and DLSS 3 delivers an incredible increase to performance and power efficiency versus prior generations.

The GeForce RTX 4060 with the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture and DLSS 3 delivers an incredible increase to performance and power efficiency versus prior generations.

NVIDIA GeForce

329,551 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Here's a direct comparison between native TAA VS DLSS 4.5 VS FSR 4 Redstone in Cyberpunk 2077. For this comparison I've used the same in-game save file, game settings and the latest drivers on both machines. The first clip shows Cyberpunk 2077 running at 1080p using native TAA. The second clip shows the game rendered at 1080p then using DLSS 4.5 preset M to upscale it to 4k Third clip shows the game rendered at 1080p then using FSR 4 Redstone to upscale it to 4k

Here's a direct comparison between native TAA VS DLSS 4.5 VS FSR 4 Redstone in Cyberpunk 2077. For this comparison I've used the same in-game save file, game settings and the latest drivers on both machines. The first clip shows Cyberpunk 2077 running at 1080p using native TAA. The second clip shows the game rendered at 1080p then using DLSS 4.5 preset M to upscale it to 4k Third clip shows the game rendered at 1080p then using FSR 4 Redstone to upscale it to 4k

NikTek

111,325 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Xbox announces automatic super resolution mode is coming to the Xbox Ally in April. Leverages AI to scale resolution up in real time to improve performance. Auto SR "fills in the gaps" by existing upscaling tools like DLSS.

Xbox announces automatic super resolution mode is coming to the Xbox Ally in April. Leverages AI to scale resolution up in real time to improve performance. Auto SR "fills in the gaps" by existing upscaling tools like DLSS.

AmericanTruckSongs9

93,095 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

RoadCraft is launching May 20th with DLSS Frame Generation, Super Resolution, DLAA, and Reflex! And GeForce RTX 50 Series gamers can enable DLSS 4 with Multi Frame Generation via the NVIDIA app to further multiply performance. See it in action in our exclusive #RTXOn trailer.

RoadCraft is launching May 20th with DLSS Frame Generation, Super Resolution, DLAA, and Reflex! And GeForce RTX 50 Series gamers can enable DLSS 4 with Multi Frame Generation via the NVIDIA app to further multiply performance. See it in action in our exclusive #RTXOn trailer.

NVIDIA GeForce

53,114 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Kingdom Come: Deliverance II is #RTXOn with DLSS Super Resolution. NVIDIA app users can upgrade to our new DLSS Super Resolution transformer AI model to further enhance image quality and activate DLAA.

Kingdom Come: Deliverance II is #RTXOn with DLSS Super Resolution. NVIDIA app users can upgrade to our new DLSS Super Resolution transformer AI model to further enhance image quality and activate DLAA.

NVIDIA GeForce

43,483 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr