They do it every single time. The debate starts with a policy: Sports. Prisons. Changing rooms. Data collection. Safeguarding. Sex-based rights. And then suddenly we’re no longer talking about the policy. We’re told we’re debating someone’s existence. No. We’re debating a policy. We’re debating rules. We’re debating competing rights... and competing interests. Changing the subject from policy to existence is one of the most effective rhetorical tricks in this entire debate because it instantly turns disagreement into cruelty. The moment someone says: “Why are you debating my existence?” Stop them. Bring it right back. “No. We’re debating a policy.” Again. And again. And again. Because if they can convince people that policy disagreement equals denying someone’s existence, they’ve already won the argument without having to defend the policy. Who’s willing to start calling this out? Not next year. Not when it’s convenient. Now. Every time it happens. “No. That’s not what we’re debating.” Watch how often the conversation changes the moment you refuse to let them switch the subject.show more

Yes, but the reality is that “trans people” do not exist as a category of humans— other than a category of people who claim something without any empirical evidence. Humans are an immutably-sexed species. No human transcends sex. No human is beyond human, but these lying people are demanding that all believe they have transcended the human condition.

@Moshery1971 You are not wrong

You’re arguing against a literal interpretation that almost nobody means. When people say women are being erased, they mean sex is being erased as a meaningful legal and social category. Females don’t disappear. Recognition of females can. When a man can be a woman in law, women no longer have women’s rights and protections. This is erasure.

Christopher Rufo is on record saying that they went after sports to challenge trans people as a whole. Shut the fuck up

Win every gender ideology debate!!!

Ann nailed this too!

Trans people exist obviously, but women are no longer defined in law in Australia. Our own commissioners state that men are included in the definition. Females are punished with fines and if they state the truth.

It's BS that it is hateful commentary. The Australian is the ONLY MSM that reports AT ALL on the women's rights side of the debate. That is literally what he is characterising as 'hateful.' All the other MSM here frame it is as 'anti-trans rights'

@AussieMAGABot Australia sees this. Australia thanks you. I’m SO glad someone, *finally* is applying an NLP based approach, to identifying & explaining the woke mind virus. This is absolutely powerful.

@AussieMAGABot Neuro linguistic programming

Agreed. I don't even care if someone feels like "presenting" as the opposite sex in their daily lives. Gender identity, as currently defined, has ZERO importance in ANY context, so go ahead, perform masculinity/femininity. Just stay out of women's spaces if you're a man.

Nope. I do not let them do this any longer. I turn it around right back at them and tell then they are violating little girls rights to feel safe in a bathroom. WTF are they going to say to that?

The most key point made here is the lack of specifics. Boy, do they hate specifics, examples, details, evidence, clarification of terms, in a phrase, 'nitty gritty.' The conversation is never allowed to go there. They become annoyed, start looking physically ill, if you try.

No. Men exist and have rights. I'm a man so I should know. We're not letting some men have a special right to watch women in toilets or use their sports to cheat. Frankly, people should be embarrassed to complain about this.

Australian here and you say everything i believe Its like banging our heads against the wall We cannot even have a NORMAL debate with these insane Marxists the language is doing my head in ITS DYSTOPIAN Thankyou 🙌👏

This lunatic Sex Discrimination Commissioner also said transwomen (sic) should be afforded discrimination rights re pregnancy. If you cannot define SEX then how is it possible in law for ANYONE to be discriminated against because of their SEX? SEX becomes a circular argument.

That's just a lie in the first sentence. No national newspaper in Australia has "pages and pages" of stories about trans. None.

So embarrassed to be Australian right now 🙄

As an Aussie, it’s so embarrassing and frustrating!

It IS a debate about existence: About the existence of women and girls as a sex class

Another brilliant analysis 😙👌

@Anne_on_gd I always say the whining about existence is precisely because “they” don’t exist. There is no category or kind of human besides male and female.

@thebistorian I’ve been putting policy into operations my entire working life…the policies of erasing women and refusing to respect sex based facilities are unoperational in any circumstances…

Point of contention. They're not only arguing for "trans" rights without ever defining wtf that means, they've slyly expanded it to now be "trans and gender diverse", which is even more vague and meaningless, but makes the overall concept sound like a larger, more legitimate class of people. We keep being manipulated to start from a point that we all know what these words mean and agree to an understanding.

It is also is reversing the agenda. These policies aid in removal of women from public life. Nouns, pronouns, spaces, sports have been given to men and sex category replaced by 'gender' which will allow them to give all jobs to men and we're home relying on them to feed us.

@V_de_vaginaa Every time! This one blocked me for noticing he was stupid.

debate among yourselves, we're not interested, stop metaphorically ranting in our faces about your wishful thinking fever dreams like unhinged whackos.

We're not debating COMPETING rights or interests. Men have no competing rights to penetrate spaces reserved for women, compared to women who have those rights.Or used to. Similarly, men have no competing interest to observe naked or vulnerable women and girls against their will.

Remember 10 years ago when they said “wE JUsT wANt 2 pEEEeeeeeeee”… remember that? We all said it’s a trojan horse. Then they infiltrated ever single possible place they could to change laws and internal HR processes. We were right

Love you doing these 👏👏👏

Welcome to the clown show called Australia.

As far as I understand, the two world wars led to the creation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Whereas the rights conferred by the Australian government to men claiming to be women are 'Civic Rights'.

The left loses every argument if they stick to facts, so they resort to emotions to manipulate people. Politicians, media, advertisers do the same. Most human decisions are based on emotions.

You’re so good at this.

@Glinner Excellent.

You amazing summary at the end should be at the beginning. ?ost people dont watch entire videos unfortunately. Start with the end first then the rest of the video is your breakdown of the evidence that brought you to the conclusion shared. Your words are important and more 1/2

Or…watch till the end. Content is free.

I always watch til the end. Wasn't a criticism at all, a suggestion to get your words heard more.