Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

They say, Any Sufficiently advanced engineering is indistinguishable from art. This is what that looks like. A 5-axis Hermle machining centre isn't simply shaping metal. It is coordinating five axes of motion simultaneously while its spindle turns at up to 18,500-41,000 RPM, following tool-paths that can contain hundreds of...

39,111 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Pi was built when there were already agent harnesses around. Here’s why Mario Zechner(Mario Zechner), found them suboptimal and built Pi, a minimalist self-modifying agent: #1 - Mario initially was a believer in Claude Code: "I was a believer in Claude code because they were the first that packaged agentic search up in a really compelling package. And at the time that fit my workflow really well. Everything around the LLM was kind of nice and tidy and easy to understand. I was super happy. I was proselytising Claude code." #2 - Reverse engineering Claude Code highlighted the degradation that Mario felt as a user: "I personally like simple tools that are stable and that I can rely on. Even if they have non-deterministic parts, all the deterministic parts should be as stable as possible. That was just not the experience with Claude Code around summer 2025. They would take away your control of the context. They would inject stuff behind your back, which is bad. Then, your workflows stopped working because there's now a system reminder that you don't even see in the UI that would modify the behaviour of the model. They would also do this to the system prompt. I built a little service where I can track the progression or evolution of the system, prompt and tool definitions and, with every release, it was messing with stuff. That just messed with my workflows and I don't appreciate that." #3 - PI was built with an appreciation for simple and reliable tools: "If I commit to a development tool, I want it to be a stable, reliable thing like a hammer. I don't want my hammer to break a different spot every day. That's terrible. We need somebody who goes the full velocity kind of way. But I don't want to work with a tool like that."

The Pragmatic Engineer

62,825 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Two data points dropped in the last few months that should terrify every software company that thinks its codebase is a moat. First, one engineer at Cloudflare, working with Claude via AI agents, rebuilt 94% of Next.js, one of the most widely used frontend frameworks on the internet, built over 10 years by a large engineering team in a single week. Total cost was $1,100 in API tokens. The result, called Vinext, is a drop-in replacement that builds production apps up to 4x faster and produces client bundles 57% smaller and customers are already running it in production. Second is Cursor CEO Michael Truell deployed a swarm of hundreds of GPT-5.2 agents that ran uninterrupted for an entire week and built a fully functional web browser from scratch called FastRender. 3 million lines of code, thousands of files and a custom Rust rendering engine with HTML parsing, CSS layout, text shaping, and a custom JavaScript VM. Total cost was roughly $30,000. For context, Google has spent billions of dollars and decades of engineering building Chrome. And the benchmarks say by next year, you will be able to one-shot prompt anything. The moat that software companies spent decades building, the complexity of their codebase, the years it would take a competitor to replicate it, the switching costs that moat assumed humans were the unit of production. AI does not care how long it took you to build it, it only cares how long it takes to rebuild it. And right now, the answer is one week.

Milk Road AI

16,781 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Spiritual Transformation Is The Only Mechanism To Go Beyond This World Science fiction, and even many whistleblowers in Ufology, often claim that incredible feats can be achieved through technology alone. Technology can be Psychic! Machines exist that can take you into the higher dimensions! You can augment yourself with technology to gain spiritual abilities! Any serious student of Spirituality should be able to see, from a mile away, that a machine cannot seriously achieve these things. The modern day spiritualization of technology is a clear symptom of a society that has lost its spiritual underpinning. It is a sign of a world that has yet to turn inward. What we are really seeing with the spiritualization of technology is human beings that are trying to externalize, and project, inner, spiritual processes and capacities onto machines. This is because it is far easier to externalize something, to project it outward, than to actually understand it's inner meaning and process within ourselves. Ultimately, externalization and projection mean that we can avoid our personal responsibilities. The reality is that machines cannot truly be psychic. Machines cannot take you anywhere you want to go in time and space. Machines cannot create spiritual abilities for you. The only reason why we believe this as a society is because we do not acknowledge the soul. And, even if we do not, as a collective, acknowledge the existence of the soul, we will still yearn for it. We will still seek it even if we do not believe it exists. And, it is this innate seeking to experience Spirit that will lead us to project it where it could not possibly exist. The Esoteric Keys to Disclosure: Audience Questions

Gigi Young

17,200 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren