正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Modern manufacturing robots are far more precise than they look. A six-axis industrial robot can move a tool through several metres of space and repeatedly bring it back to within a few hundredths of a millimetre. Some precision oriented systems achieve repeatability of around 0.02-0.05 mm. That precision is...

171,974 次观看 • 7 天前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

OSINT_Strong 的头像
OSINT_Strong7 天前

This is as big of a leap as standardization of parts was compared to the creation of custom parts by every worker.

Ammanichanda 的头像
Ammanichanda7 天前

Absolutely. Standardized parts made mass production repeatable at the component level, robotics pushed that same principle into the manufacturing process itself. Now not only the part, but the weld, hole, paint path and assembly movement can be repeated thousands of times with extraordinary consistency. It is also one reason two cars of the same model leaving a factory today are remarkably similar, whereas 50-60 years ago considerably more unit to unit manufacturing variation was normal.

Elodie 3DFontaine 的头像
Elodie 3DFontaine7 天前

Meanwhile my 3D printer fights for 0.1 mm and this KUKA holds 0.02 all day. Every time I watch a robot trace the same weld path hundreds of times, I respect the specs more. Specs really do matter.

Room Hater 的头像
Room Hater7 天前

With some machine learning and some laser inferometers for calibration you can get repeatable accuracy as good as 5 microns. Look up Xaba Inc . They are experts at getting that sort of accuracy from polar axis robots.

Helgrim 的头像
Helgrim7 天前

I'll be impressed if it can maintain that precision through a magnitude 9 earthquake.

K.A. 的头像
K.A.7 天前

She used to check my social media posts like that

Peter Austin ᛉ 的头像
Peter Austin ᛉ7 天前

I'd prefer to work in a factory of robots than BAE.

Joey Penniman 的头像
Joey Penniman7 天前

And yet car bodies still have tolerances that stack up to mm.

Ammanichanda 的头像
Ammanichanda7 天前

The robot itself can repeat a movement to within hundredths of a millimetre, but the car body is made from hundreds of individual stamped and joined parts, each with its own small dimensional variation. Those imperfections accumulate through the assembly, and welding itself can introduce further distortion. So by the time you measure across the completed body, the tolerance can easily be in millimetres.

Ratidzo Goredema 的头像
Ratidzo Goredema7 天前

Right. There.

Last Riddles 的头像
Last Riddles7 天前

Indian billionaire could've purchase that robot when it's up for sale in germany but china grab it

相关视频

I want to hear all the competing theses for how manufacturing happens in space. My current view: The first thing we'll manufacture in space won't be spacecraft. It'll be hydrocarbons. We need fuel and food. Survival before sophistication. For a long time, most hardware will still be shipped from Earth. Manufacturing will mostly mean repair, maintenance, and replacement of spare parts by astronauts maybe robots. 1000s of Starships leaving with lots of spare parts every 18 month. So the real challenge isn't producing known parts. It's dealing with the unexpected. Every settlement, station, ship, or habitat will eventually break in ways nobody predicted. New missions will create needs nobody anticipated. Waiting months for a launch window is not a viable supply chain. That implies, space manufacturing cannot begin with giant, specialized factories. It starts with highly versatile systems capable of making many different things from limited feedstocks. Multi-purpose robots. Flexible. General-purpose manufacturing cells. In other words, the opposite of most factories today. My bet is that space manufacturing evolves as a network of distributed robotic job shops and microfactories, not monolithic production plants. The manufacturing systems that win early because they can repair the unexpected will become the industrial legacy of space. When demand eventually grows large enough for mass production, those flexible systems will already be everywhere so that is the paradigm that will scale to large volumes. What's the strongest argument against this?

Edward Mehr

16,926 次观看 • 3 个月前