Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

They silenced Dr. Peter McCullough, the most published cardiologist in history, for questioning the COVID vaccine. But this playbook isn't new. Dr. Andrew Wakefield reveals it happened to him decades ago. He claims his research linking vaccines to illness made him a target of a coordinated media hit. The...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

368,092 subscribers

20,450 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & WellnessNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Dr. Andy Wakefield — highly esteemed physician turned filmmaker — is a FEATURED SPEAKER at the 2025 Children’s Health Defense Conference in Austin, Texas this November. Dr. Wakefield is a trailblazer in the medical freedom movement as his FAMOUS 1999 paper, “MMR vaccination and autism” published in The Lancet, began uncovering the dark web of lies linking MMR vaccines to autism, instigating an all out war on Wakefield’s credentials and character. Now, years later, he continues to fight for the truth, regardless of the attacks that come his way. Register today to see Dr. Wakefield speak in person! 👇
1:38

Dr. Andy Wakefield — highly esteemed physician turned filmmaker — is a FEATURED SPEAKER at the 2025 Children’s Health Defense Conference in Austin, Texas this November. Dr. Wakefield is a trailblazer in the medical freedom movement as his FAMOUS 1999 paper, “MMR vaccination and autism” published in The Lancet, began uncovering the dark web of lies linking MMR vaccines to autism, instigating an all out war on Wakefield’s credentials and character. Now, years later, he continues to fight for the truth, regardless of the attacks that come his way. Register today to see Dr. Wakefield speak in person! 👇

Children’s Health Defense

35,415 views • 1 year ago

NOW: President Trump JUST said the Andrew Wakefield part out loud Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell asked President Trump if he supported spacing out combination vaccines like MMR. He said "YES". This is a Monumental, and it's what Andrew Wakefield proposed decades ago. When Andrew Wakefield investigated the evidence, he found a lack of safety testing for the combined vaccines. Andrew Wakefield - "When they put the three together (MMR), did they conduct the safety studies to determine whether 1 and 3 were equal, in terms of their safety profile? No they didn't" At that time, Big Pharma forced parents into MMR, by stopping the availability. Andrew Wakefield said - "you could no longer get it [so] the option for parents was taken away [and in the U.S.] Merck unilaterally made the policy decision that they were going to sop making the singles".
2:30

NOW: President Trump JUST said the Andrew Wakefield part out loud Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell asked President Trump if he supported spacing out combination vaccines like MMR. He said "YES". This is a Monumental, and it's what Andrew Wakefield proposed decades ago. When Andrew Wakefield investigated the evidence, he found a lack of safety testing for the combined vaccines. Andrew Wakefield - "When they put the three together (MMR), did they conduct the safety studies to determine whether 1 and 3 were equal, in terms of their safety profile? No they didn't" At that time, Big Pharma forced parents into MMR, by stopping the availability. Andrew Wakefield said - "you could no longer get it [so] the option for parents was taken away [and in the U.S.] Merck unilaterally made the policy decision that they were going to sop making the singles".

Humanspective

69,136 views • 11 months ago

The troubling history of the MMR vaccine ⬇️ We’ve been told to “trust the science,” but the vaccine industry’s fair share of troubling incidents surrounding vaccines doesn’t instill much faith in the public. For decades, manufacturers of the MMR vaccine continued giving versions of their vaccine they knew were injuring people, as Dr Suzanne Humphries points out. “The vaccine that came in 1963 was a formalin-inactivated vaccine and it caused such horrible, disastrous problems that it was often injected alongside of immune serum globulin. And then they made a vaccine after that that was a live viral vaccine, but it wasn't attenuated, it wasn't dampened down. And so it was causing basically measles in people.”
1:31

The troubling history of the MMR vaccine ⬇️ We’ve been told to “trust the science,” but the vaccine industry’s fair share of troubling incidents surrounding vaccines doesn’t instill much faith in the public. For decades, manufacturers of the MMR vaccine continued giving versions of their vaccine they knew were injuring people, as Dr Suzanne Humphries points out. “The vaccine that came in 1963 was a formalin-inactivated vaccine and it caused such horrible, disastrous problems that it was often injected alongside of immune serum globulin. And then they made a vaccine after that that was a live viral vaccine, but it wasn't attenuated, it wasn't dampened down. And so it was causing basically measles in people.”

Children’s Health Defense

13,035 views • 1 year ago

Dr. Andrew Wakefield: Exposing the MMR Vaccine and Autism Link In a gripping interview with Michael Knowles, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, a courageous scientist who sparked global debate with his 1998 Lancet paper suggesting a potential MMR vaccine-autism link, revealed shocking details about his research and the CDC’s alleged cover-up. Wakefield shared how, in the late 1990s, the UK banned single-dose measles vaccines, enforcing the MMR. This period saw rising concerns about a vaccine-autism connection, amplified by voices like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., now Secretary of Health and Human Services. Wakefield’s team published 15-17 papers investigating this hypothesis, focusing on early MMR exposure as a risk factor. In 2001, Wakefield presented to the CDC and the Oversight Committee on Government Reform, hypothesizing that MMR vaccination at 12-15 months could heighten autism risk compared to later doses. The CDC’s study confirmed a highly significant risk in children vaccinated on time versus later. Yet, Wakefield alleges, they buried these findings for 14 years, destroying documents and falsifying data to shield their reputation and the vaccine program. Dr. William Thompson, a senior CDC scientist, later contacted Wakefield’s wife, confessing, “We could have salvaged your husband’s career if we’d been honest.” Tormented by guilt, Thompson preserved the original data, revealing the CDC’s fraud to scientist Brian Hooker. This exposed how the agency hid evidence, risking millions of children’s neurological health. Wakefield’s belief in the MMR-autism link was cemented not only by his own research but by the CDC’s desperate efforts to discredit him and suppress their findings. He spoke with heartbreak, not for his own sacrifices, but for the children harmed without a voice. “It’s not about me,” he declared. “It’s about those children who had no choice.” Wakefield’s story is a testament to the cost of seeking truth against powerful institutions.
7:11

Dr. Andrew Wakefield: Exposing the MMR Vaccine and Autism Link In a gripping interview with Michael Knowles, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, a courageous scientist who sparked global debate with his 1998 Lancet paper suggesting a potential MMR vaccine-autism link, revealed shocking details about his research and the CDC’s alleged cover-up. Wakefield shared how, in the late 1990s, the UK banned single-dose measles vaccines, enforcing the MMR. This period saw rising concerns about a vaccine-autism connection, amplified by voices like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., now Secretary of Health and Human Services. Wakefield’s team published 15-17 papers investigating this hypothesis, focusing on early MMR exposure as a risk factor. In 2001, Wakefield presented to the CDC and the Oversight Committee on Government Reform, hypothesizing that MMR vaccination at 12-15 months could heighten autism risk compared to later doses. The CDC’s study confirmed a highly significant risk in children vaccinated on time versus later. Yet, Wakefield alleges, they buried these findings for 14 years, destroying documents and falsifying data to shield their reputation and the vaccine program. Dr. William Thompson, a senior CDC scientist, later contacted Wakefield’s wife, confessing, “We could have salvaged your husband’s career if we’d been honest.” Tormented by guilt, Thompson preserved the original data, revealing the CDC’s fraud to scientist Brian Hooker. This exposed how the agency hid evidence, risking millions of children’s neurological health. Wakefield’s belief in the MMR-autism link was cemented not only by his own research but by the CDC’s desperate efforts to discredit him and suppress their findings. He spoke with heartbreak, not for his own sacrifices, but for the children harmed without a voice. “It’s not about me,” he declared. “It’s about those children who had no choice.” Wakefield’s story is a testament to the cost of seeking truth against powerful institutions.

Camus

19,975 views • 1 year ago

Largest peer reviewed autopsy series in the World. William Makis: "A Tsunami of evidence". Dr Peter McCullough: "In the largest autopsy series published to date [in] 73.9% of individuals, it was determined that the [mod RNA] vaccine was the cause of death".
1:36

Largest peer reviewed autopsy series in the World. William Makis: "A Tsunami of evidence". Dr Peter McCullough: "In the largest autopsy series published to date [in] 73.9% of individuals, it was determined that the [mod RNA] vaccine was the cause of death".

Humanspective

160,266 views • 9 months ago

Dr. Andy Wakefield: A U.S. Government Document Once Declared That “Criticism of the Vaccine Cannot Be Allowed to Exist.” That line, buried deep in the Federal Register years ago, stopped Dr. Andy Wakefield cold. It was about the polio vaccine—but it revealed something much darker. The U.S. government had written, in plain language, that any evidence—no matter how rigorous, honest, or true—must not be allowed to exist if it questions the vaccine. For Wakefield, that was the moment the illusion shattered. The moment he saw that the battle wasn’t scientific—it was political, ideological, total. “That is the matrix,” he said. “The world they allow you to see. Anything that challenges it must be erased.” That realization chilled him. As a scientist, he realized it meant the end of open inquiry. The death of debate. The rise of control disguised as consensus. A system that forbids questions isn’t defending public health—it’s defending power.
0:59

Dr. Andy Wakefield: A U.S. Government Document Once Declared That “Criticism of the Vaccine Cannot Be Allowed to Exist.” That line, buried deep in the Federal Register years ago, stopped Dr. Andy Wakefield cold. It was about the polio vaccine—but it revealed something much darker. The U.S. government had written, in plain language, that any evidence—no matter how rigorous, honest, or true—must not be allowed to exist if it questions the vaccine. For Wakefield, that was the moment the illusion shattered. The moment he saw that the battle wasn’t scientific—it was political, ideological, total. “That is the matrix,” he said. “The world they allow you to see. Anything that challenges it must be erased.” That realization chilled him. As a scientist, he realized it meant the end of open inquiry. The death of debate. The rise of control disguised as consensus. A system that forbids questions isn’t defending public health—it’s defending power.

Camus

95,031 views • 9 months ago

Dr. Andy Wakefield says the new study linking vaccines to autism will be a major boost for RFK Jr.’s efforts in the White House. Dr. Andy Wakefield: “I think it’s tremendously supportive of Bobby Kennedy’s initiative in the White House at the moment.” “There’s a lot of pressure on him to stop doing what he’s doing, to get rid of him completely — and it’s coming from both sides of the aisle.” “He’s now got something in his armamentum that can say, no, there is a very sound reason for doing this.” “This paper definitively says vaccines are a modifiable risk factor.” “Parents need to be told about this study — about the potential risks — and then they need to be allowed to make up their own minds.” Dr. Andy Wakefield Brian Hooker, PhD
1:42

Dr. Andy Wakefield says the new study linking vaccines to autism will be a major boost for RFK Jr.’s efforts in the White House. Dr. Andy Wakefield: “I think it’s tremendously supportive of Bobby Kennedy’s initiative in the White House at the moment.” “There’s a lot of pressure on him to stop doing what he’s doing, to get rid of him completely — and it’s coming from both sides of the aisle.” “He’s now got something in his armamentum that can say, no, there is a very sound reason for doing this.” “This paper definitively says vaccines are a modifiable risk factor.” “Parents need to be told about this study — about the potential risks — and then they need to be allowed to make up their own minds.” Dr. Andy Wakefield Brian Hooker, PhD

Children’s Health Defense

19,438 views • 10 months ago

NEW: Joe Rogan says Dr. Peter McCullough was RIGHT about everything all along. “Five years later, we know he’s right. We know he was right.” But he didn’t stop there. Rogan praised Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Peter McCullough as fearless truth-tellers, saying both felt “morally obligated to tell the truth.” “Dr. Robert Malone, who has nine patents in the invention of mRNA vaccine technology. Like, he took it himself. Yeah. He was reporting his insane adverse side effect where he almost died. He was telling about it, and they labeled him a kook for that.” He then turned to McCullough. “Dr. Peter McCullough is the most published physician in his field in human history. Like, this is an incredibly well-respected doctor up until he took a moral and ethical stand saying that this is not what they’re saying, this is not what we should be doing. They tried to destroy his career… But the man has incredible courage.” Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®, Robert W Malone, MD
2:02

NEW: Joe Rogan says Dr. Peter McCullough was RIGHT about everything all along. “Five years later, we know he’s right. We know he was right.” But he didn’t stop there. Rogan praised Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Peter McCullough as fearless truth-tellers, saying both felt “morally obligated to tell the truth.” “Dr. Robert Malone, who has nine patents in the invention of mRNA vaccine technology. Like, he took it himself. Yeah. He was reporting his insane adverse side effect where he almost died. He was telling about it, and they labeled him a kook for that.” He then turned to McCullough. “Dr. Peter McCullough is the most published physician in his field in human history. Like, this is an incredibly well-respected doctor up until he took a moral and ethical stand saying that this is not what they’re saying, this is not what we should be doing. They tried to destroy his career… But the man has incredible courage.” Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®, Robert W Malone, MD

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

422,927 views • 1 year ago

25 years ago, a British doctor paid the ultimate price for challenging the system. Dr. Andy Wakefield dared to raise concerns about the MMR shot and suggest the need for caution due to the link he found between the combination shot and autism. For speaking this truth, he was stripped of his medical license, mocked and vilified worldwide for decades—his career erased. Now, decades later, President Donald J. Trump is calling for the same action that ended Wakefield’s career: separating the MMR doses due to its plausible link to autism. This is how corruption works—silence the messenger, bury the truth. The question isn’t “was Wakefield right?” The question is: why was he silenced? This is a must-watch video.
7:05

25 years ago, a British doctor paid the ultimate price for challenging the system. Dr. Andy Wakefield dared to raise concerns about the MMR shot and suggest the need for caution due to the link he found between the combination shot and autism. For speaking this truth, he was stripped of his medical license, mocked and vilified worldwide for decades—his career erased. Now, decades later, President Donald J. Trump is calling for the same action that ended Wakefield’s career: separating the MMR doses due to its plausible link to autism. This is how corruption works—silence the messenger, bury the truth. The question isn’t “was Wakefield right?” The question is: why was he silenced? This is a must-watch video.

Children’s Health Defense

140,627 views • 11 months ago

DR. ANDY WAKEFIELD: “THE MOTHERS WERE RIGHT.” In a new interview with, Dr. Andy Wakefield reflected on the decades-long debate over vaccines and autism, arguing that parents who raised concerns were dismissed instead of being heard. “The mothers were right. Medicine ignored them, and now the case has been proven.” Wakefield pointed to a review of 136 scientific papers that he says supports further scrutiny of childhood vaccination schedules and autism rates. He also criticized health authorities for failing to adequately investigate concerns raised by families over the past three decades. “All I asked for was further research. That research was sabotaged.” After 30+ years of controversy, Wakefield says the conversation is far from over.
4:23

DR. ANDY WAKEFIELD: “THE MOTHERS WERE RIGHT.” In a new interview with, Dr. Andy Wakefield reflected on the decades-long debate over vaccines and autism, arguing that parents who raised concerns were dismissed instead of being heard. “The mothers were right. Medicine ignored them, and now the case has been proven.” Wakefield pointed to a review of 136 scientific papers that he says supports further scrutiny of childhood vaccination schedules and autism rates. He also criticized health authorities for failing to adequately investigate concerns raised by families over the past three decades. “All I asked for was further research. That research was sabotaged.” After 30+ years of controversy, Wakefield says the conversation is far from over.

LindellTV

18,737 views • 2 months ago

Dr. Andrew Wakefield exposes critical flaws in vaccine safety assumptions in a riveting discussion with Dr. Paul Marik. "The cumulative toxic load from multiple vaccines is very important," Wakefield asserts, pointing to the staggering 70+ vaccines, many with adjuvants, that children receive today. He emphasizes the need to listen to parents who report their children regressing shortly after receiving the MMR vaccine. "Is MMR the straw that breaks the camel’s back?" Wakefield asks, stressing that the science to investigate this should have been done long ago. He proposes a robust study comparing single vaccines, spaced adequately apart, against the combined MMR, including an unvaccinated control group—a study that should have been conducted from the start. Shockingly, Wakefield recounts a conversation with Dr. David Salisbury, then-UK Director of Vaccination Policy, who admitted no safety comparison between single and triple vaccines was ever done because "we had no reason to assume it would be a problem." Wakefield’s response is scathing: "You do NOT assume. You do not make assumptions on behalf of every child in the UK and, by proxy, the world, because it’s inconvenient to find an association." This "kindergarten thinking" in public health, Wakefield warns, mirrors the reckless assumption that the COVID vaccine would remain at the injection site—only to later discover it spreads throughout the body after targeting billions. The failure to rigorously test vaccine safety has led us to an "unhappy pass," he laments. It’s time to demand accountability and proper science. Listen to parents. Stop assuming. Start studying. The health of our children depends on it.
3:17

Dr. Andrew Wakefield exposes critical flaws in vaccine safety assumptions in a riveting discussion with Dr. Paul Marik. "The cumulative toxic load from multiple vaccines is very important," Wakefield asserts, pointing to the staggering 70+ vaccines, many with adjuvants, that children receive today. He emphasizes the need to listen to parents who report their children regressing shortly after receiving the MMR vaccine. "Is MMR the straw that breaks the camel’s back?" Wakefield asks, stressing that the science to investigate this should have been done long ago. He proposes a robust study comparing single vaccines, spaced adequately apart, against the combined MMR, including an unvaccinated control group—a study that should have been conducted from the start. Shockingly, Wakefield recounts a conversation with Dr. David Salisbury, then-UK Director of Vaccination Policy, who admitted no safety comparison between single and triple vaccines was ever done because "we had no reason to assume it would be a problem." Wakefield’s response is scathing: "You do NOT assume. You do not make assumptions on behalf of every child in the UK and, by proxy, the world, because it’s inconvenient to find an association." This "kindergarten thinking" in public health, Wakefield warns, mirrors the reckless assumption that the COVID vaccine would remain at the injection site—only to later discover it spreads throughout the body after targeting billions. The failure to rigorously test vaccine safety has led us to an "unhappy pass," he laments. It’s time to demand accountability and proper science. Listen to parents. Stop assuming. Start studying. The health of our children depends on it.

Camus

49,483 views • 1 year ago

TRUMP'S RECENT ANNOUNCEMENT IS A VINDICATION FOR WAKEFIELD For 30 years, Andrew Wakefield was vilified for calling for the same actions our President just called for regarding vaccines and autism, among them: 1) Split MMR 2) Remove mercury & aluminum 3) Study childhood vaccines + autism In 1998, Wakefield’s career was destroyed. He became the longest-running news story in history for questioning this science and demanding more. Decades later, it is becoming U.S. policy. As Dr. Wakefield says, "It's pro-safety, pro-transparency, pro-child, and pro-informed consent." And, as the saying goes, 'Wakefield was right.'
1:41

TRUMP'S RECENT ANNOUNCEMENT IS A VINDICATION FOR WAKEFIELD For 30 years, Andrew Wakefield was vilified for calling for the same actions our President just called for regarding vaccines and autism, among them: 1) Split MMR 2) Remove mercury & aluminum 3) Study childhood vaccines + autism In 1998, Wakefield’s career was destroyed. He became the longest-running news story in history for questioning this science and demanding more. Decades later, it is becoming U.S. policy. As Dr. Wakefield says, "It's pro-safety, pro-transparency, pro-child, and pro-informed consent." And, as the saying goes, 'Wakefield was right.'

The HighWire

42,509 views • 10 months ago

Dr. Andy Wakefield was attacked like no other scientist in history for questioning vaccines. Now, President Trump and RFK Jr. have shown he was right — and Wakefield says the fight for children’s health must continue. “For three decades, I’ve stood by the principle that we must protect our children by questioning a vaccine schedule that has grown unchecked and untested.” “President Trump announced a sweeping plan to reform the childhood vaccine schedule. And he did it by adopting the very recommendation I made back in 1998.” “That includes splitting the MMR vaccine into individual measles, mumps, and rubella shots… delaying the hepatitis B vaccine until age 12… removing mercury and aluminum… spacing out vaccines… and eliminating Tylenol use around vaccination.” “For the millions of parents whose children were injured, ignored, gaslit, and shamed — this is vindication. But more importantly, it’s hope.” “This is about being pro-safety, pro-transparency, and pro-child — and particularly pro the right of parents to choose on behalf of their children.” “The autism epidemic is real — and it’s time we confronted it with honesty.” Dr. Andy Wakefield
1:56

Dr. Andy Wakefield was attacked like no other scientist in history for questioning vaccines. Now, President Trump and RFK Jr. have shown he was right — and Wakefield says the fight for children’s health must continue. “For three decades, I’ve stood by the principle that we must protect our children by questioning a vaccine schedule that has grown unchecked and untested.” “President Trump announced a sweeping plan to reform the childhood vaccine schedule. And he did it by adopting the very recommendation I made back in 1998.” “That includes splitting the MMR vaccine into individual measles, mumps, and rubella shots… delaying the hepatitis B vaccine until age 12… removing mercury and aluminum… spacing out vaccines… and eliminating Tylenol use around vaccination.” “For the millions of parents whose children were injured, ignored, gaslit, and shamed — this is vindication. But more importantly, it’s hope.” “This is about being pro-safety, pro-transparency, and pro-child — and particularly pro the right of parents to choose on behalf of their children.” “The autism epidemic is real — and it’s time we confronted it with honesty.” Dr. Andy Wakefield

Children’s Health Defense

189,169 views • 10 months ago

So, Wakefield was right. A team of 13 highly regarded specialists in their fields actually published a study after taking biopsies of severely Autistic children with major gut and bowel issues finding high levels of inflammation with the measles vaccine virus in gut and bowel linings... But that was debunked and the leader of that team, Dr Andrew Wakefield, was ostracized for his findings. He lost everything including his high ranking job/career at a world renowned hospital. However, 2 years later the study was exonerated but he was never apologised to and it was never picked up by the media, go figure.
1:02

So, Wakefield was right. A team of 13 highly regarded specialists in their fields actually published a study after taking biopsies of severely Autistic children with major gut and bowel issues finding high levels of inflammation with the measles vaccine virus in gut and bowel linings... But that was debunked and the leader of that team, Dr Andrew Wakefield, was ostracized for his findings. He lost everything including his high ranking job/career at a world renowned hospital. However, 2 years later the study was exonerated but he was never apologised to and it was never picked up by the media, go figure.

Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

679,933 views • 2 years ago

The COVID Vaccine That Could Have Ended the Pandemic—And Stopped a Looming "Pandemic of Cancer." The FDA Blocked It. In a stunning account, Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong reveals the story of the vaccine that was—a true sterilizing shot designed not just to reduce symptoms, but to eliminate the COVID-19 virus from the body entirely. While "Operation Warp Speed" championed antibody-based vaccines, Dr. Soon-Shiong's "BioStrike/BioShield" took a different path. It was engineered to activate T-cells and Natural Killer cells—the body's elite forces for hunting and destroying viruses. His vaccine was the only candidate in a key primate trial that successfully cleared the virus. It promised not just temporary protection, but long-term immunity that could prevent transmission and stop the virus in its tracks. Yet, when he applied to the FDA for a Phase II trial to deploy it as a crucial booster, he was met with a wall of silence and refusal. At the same time, the manufacturing ecosystem was entirely consumed by the major players, leaving no resources for this superior alternative. Dr. Soon-Shiong issues a dire warning rooted in science: COVID-19 is a systemic vascular virus. When it lingers, it causes chronic inflammation. This inflammation, he states, has a "sad, sad chance" of triggering a looming global pandemic of cancer with a 5-10 year latency. The world was given a tool to reduce immediate mortality. But it was denied the tool that could have cleared the virus, potentially prevented long COVID, and averted a future cancer crisis. This is not just a story of a missed opportunity; it's a warning we must now heed.
7:57

The COVID Vaccine That Could Have Ended the Pandemic—And Stopped a Looming "Pandemic of Cancer." The FDA Blocked It. In a stunning account, Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong reveals the story of the vaccine that was—a true sterilizing shot designed not just to reduce symptoms, but to eliminate the COVID-19 virus from the body entirely. While "Operation Warp Speed" championed antibody-based vaccines, Dr. Soon-Shiong's "BioStrike/BioShield" took a different path. It was engineered to activate T-cells and Natural Killer cells—the body's elite forces for hunting and destroying viruses. His vaccine was the only candidate in a key primate trial that successfully cleared the virus. It promised not just temporary protection, but long-term immunity that could prevent transmission and stop the virus in its tracks. Yet, when he applied to the FDA for a Phase II trial to deploy it as a crucial booster, he was met with a wall of silence and refusal. At the same time, the manufacturing ecosystem was entirely consumed by the major players, leaving no resources for this superior alternative. Dr. Soon-Shiong issues a dire warning rooted in science: COVID-19 is a systemic vascular virus. When it lingers, it causes chronic inflammation. This inflammation, he states, has a "sad, sad chance" of triggering a looming global pandemic of cancer with a 5-10 year latency. The world was given a tool to reduce immediate mortality. But it was denied the tool that could have cleared the virus, potentially prevented long COVID, and averted a future cancer crisis. This is not just a story of a missed opportunity; it's a warning we must now heed.

Camus

300,407 views • 10 months ago