Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

“They’re lying to you about Climate Change” “These engineered disasters are pushing people off their lands” Powerful 45 second clip which I’ve had independently fact checked by 30,000 Fact Checkers & it was unanimously Fact Checked True ✅ (Okay I made the last bit up - was only 25,000...

52,844 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 4

Фото профиля The Liberation Project
The Liberation Project1 год назад

𝐔𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐇𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐬 𝐋𝐨𝐬𝐭 The liberal establishment has abandoned their base and emboldened Trump to capture voters who are disillusioned with the status quo. We need to move forward to build a legitimate working class coalition... ★ NEW ARTICLE ⬇️

Фото профиля Gabi 🇦🇶
Gabi 🇦🇶1 год назад

GM 😮‍💨😌 look at my lovely water vapor crystal lines they gifted my morning with here in the middle of nowhere 😍 these ppl truly love ❤️ me

Фото профиля Tape
Tape1 год назад

They also use crisis actors like the people in the quoted video. They're controlling both sides. They're committing the crimes and organizing the great awakening, with the intention of coming to our rescue by taking away our rights for our protection.

Фото профиля gary wallis
gary wallis1 год назад

Watch, Climate the movie (the cold truth ) Very fascinating watch

Похожие видео

David Sacks criticizes the presidential debate fact-checking, noting Kamala Harris pushed debunked hoaxes like "Very Fine People," "Suckers and Losers," and "Bloodbath," while Springfield, Ohio's city manager acknowledged complaints in March about pets being eaten. "You basically had a three-on-one situation. It turns out that Linsey Davis is Kamala's sorority sister. David Muir was fact-checking him constantly, and some of those fact-checks weren't even correct. For example, we now know that the Springfield city manager has acknowledged complaints about pets being eaten. As far back as March, there are videos of him talking about the complaints." "You can say you don't believe those stories or whatever, but those reports were real. But David Muir fact-checked in real-time, saying that Trump was wrong, and there was an effort to gaslight and make him sound crazy during the debate when there were, in fact, sources for what he was saying." "And they only fact-check one candidate. For example, when Kamala Harris repeated numerous hoaxes like the Very Fine People hoax, the Bloodbath hoax, and the Suckers and Losers hoax. I mean, these are things that were already addressed in the last debate. And, you know, even left-wing sites like Snopes have said the Very Fine People thing is totally made up. The Bloodbath one was really egregious, too, because he was talking about the auto industry. She was able to say these things and never got fact-checked once." Follow -> David Sacks

KanekoaTheGreat

16,893,950 просмотров • 1 год назад

This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate. There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span. This is not “bias." It’s much worse. This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information. When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is. The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed. In this clip: 1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange. 2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check. 3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check. 4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check. 5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check. 6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check. 7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check. To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators: "They did exactly what their bosses wanted."

Western Lensman

41,368,958 просмотров • 1 год назад