Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

This entire MMORPG was vibe coded in just 2 months 2 factions, 6 classes, level 50 progression, dungeons, raids, crafting, mounts, dynamic events, PvP and 10v10 battlegrounds, all running directly in the browser The creator uses mostly Opus 5, with Fable 5 as the orchestrator, and says he barely... show more

Hakimi Eiqbal

1,324 subscribers

21,522 views • 16 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

18 Comments

John Smith16 days ago

I personally wouldn't brag about my game being AI slop

yungballa16 days ago

I mean no hate but this looks terrible. Just because you can make systems for free doesn’t mean you can make a good game

Hakimi Eiqbal16 days ago

Lythravel is completely free and already playable in your browser Play: Community:

Hakimi Eiqbal16 days ago

you probably don't need an entire dev team to start anymore QuadcodeAI gives you frontier coding, reasoning, image and video models in one workspace WLCM0730 gets you 1000 free credits to start building

Dalty16 days ago

Kinda looks like an open world rpg version of Minecraft dungeons

HerculesHomeless16 days ago

Sheshhhh that’s impressive 🤯

Trevyon16 days ago

Nice work

Orion (e/acc)16 days ago

looks like trove, impressive tho

Kevin16 days ago

the sandbox is shaking rn

Jacopod16 days ago

Two months for level 50 progression and dungeons is genuinely fast. The thing I'd want to read is what broke first once two clients disagreed, because that's the bug class no amount of generated code gets right on the first pass.

IngressLog16 days ago

Looks like less than a day, lol

Aryaa SK16 days ago

two months and bro wants an A on ratemygithub 😂

Igor Silva16 days ago

looks nice, whats the stack?

Sosiaalioikeistolainen16 days ago

But why?

The Indie Games Network16 days ago

That really looks impressive ngl. It's scary what AI can do already, and in a couple of years, there's going to be an oversaturation of AI generated games.

Build With Nauf16 days ago

damn this is good

A̸̬͌a̶͛͜r̸̟͗ō̵̟ň̷͎ ̵̬̋B̸̧̌ò̴̱w̷̤̎ĺ̵͓ě̶̜y̸̺͛16 days ago

isn’t that just minecraft

Jamji Jamaramji16 days ago

such a yesterday post. software is solved. get over it. move on and do the next thing: HARDWARE! you can do it!

Related Videos

This is the best way to use Claude Fable in Claude Code without immediately hitting your limits. 1. Model set to Fable 5 2. Reasoning on Max 3. Instruct Claude to run a dynamic workflow where: 3a. Fable is the orchestrator 3b. Opus does the reasoning heavy phases Fable is so overpowered that you don't need its intelligence for every step. Let it orchestrate Opus or even Sonnet.

This is the best way to use Claude Fable in Claude Code without immediately hitting your limits. 1. Model set to Fable 5 2. Reasoning on Max 3. Instruct Claude to run a dynamic workflow where: 3a. Fable is the orchestrator 3b. Opus does the reasoning heavy phases Fable is so overpowered that you don't need its intelligence for every step. Let it orchestrate Opus or even Sonnet.

Dan McAteer

910,847 views • 3 months ago

Fable 5.1 is an absolute beast for game dev. I took my Opus 5 space game and told Fable to "just make it look better". It overhauled everything with a TON of detail, AND made it 2x faster 🤯 Code: Demo: Every pixel you see is made by AI. Fable modeled everything in Blender, generated textures with code, and in a few cases ran image models via CLI. In mere months we'll be vibe-coding AAA graphics at this rate. Just insane. Of course, Fable recorded and edited this comparison video too (with a little help from Opus at the end, because of the Fable outage)

Fable 5.1 is an absolute beast for game dev. I took my Opus 5 space game and told Fable to "just make it look better". It overhauled everything with a TON of detail, AND made it 2x faster 🤯 Code: Demo: Every pixel you see is made by AI. Fable modeled everything in Blender, generated textures with code, and in a few cases ran image models via CLI. In mere months we'll be vibe-coding AAA graphics at this rate. Just insane. Of course, Fable recorded and edited this comparison video too (with a little help from Opus at the end, because of the Fable outage)

Anshu

48,983 views • 15 days ago

opus 5 is getting routed to opus 5.2 tested opus 5 on xhigh with the same prompt in devin and claude code but results came out really different > claude code one is clean and more detailed > while devin one is almost there but not the same opus 5 in cc used to be lazy and hard to communicate with, but something changed in the last 2 days now it works for longer and is way easier to communicate with anthropic did same with fable release too where some users were being routed to fable 5.1 so it’s very likely opus 5 is getting routed to 5.2 in claude code can you guys tests and lemme know if it's getting routed for you or not?

opus 5 is getting routed to opus 5.2 tested opus 5 on xhigh with the same prompt in devin and claude code but results came out really different > claude code one is clean and more detailed > while devin one is almost there but not the same opus 5 in cc used to be lazy and hard to communicate with, but something changed in the last 2 days now it works for longer and is way easier to communicate with anthropic did same with fable release too where some users were being routed to fable 5.1 so it’s very likely opus 5 is getting routed to 5.2 in claude code can you guys tests and lemme know if it's getting routed for you or not?

J A Z I I

140,113 views • 4 days ago

the thing that makes Opus 4.5 special is you can vibe code forever without it losing the plot. i vibe coded an iOS app this weekend that any frontier model could build in one shot. but the special thing about Opus is i kept adding features and fixing bugs and never oncej fell down a rabbit hole of errors or found myself with hopelessly confused spaghetti code it just kept working and working and working truly next level as a coding model

the thing that makes Opus 4.5 special is you can vibe code forever without it losing the plot. i vibe coded an iOS app this weekend that any frontier model could build in one shot. but the special thing about Opus is i kept adding features and fixing bugs and never oncej fell down a rabbit hole of errors or found myself with hopelessly confused spaghetti code it just kept working and working and working truly next level as a coding model

Dan Shipper 📧

85,253 views • 9 months ago

While your team is just getting started vibe coding prototypes, the team at Stripe is vibe coding a full vibe coding platform. Owen Williams ⚡ is a design manager at Stripe who built Protodash - an internal AI prototyping tool that lets designers and PMs spin up real, clickable prototypes in minutes. In this ep he walks through: - why generic AI tools produce "blurple slop" that doesn't match your design system - how he built a full prototyping studio on top of dev boxes with cursor + cc - why more PMs than designers now use Protodash - the design review mode that lets teams ship feedback direct in the app Plus, we talk about getting to the ultimate dream: demos, not memos. ty to our sponsors! 🧠 CESAR - Intelligent automation built for AI 💻 Cursor - The best way to code with AI Full episode on yt:

While your team is just getting started vibe coding prototypes, the team at Stripe is vibe coding a full vibe coding platform. Owen Williams ⚡ is a design manager at Stripe who built Protodash - an internal AI prototyping tool that lets designers and PMs spin up real, clickable prototypes in minutes. In this ep he walks through: - why generic AI tools produce "blurple slop" that doesn't match your design system - how he built a full prototyping studio on top of dev boxes with cursor + cc - why more PMs than designers now use Protodash - the design review mode that lets teams ship feedback direct in the app Plus, we talk about getting to the ultimate dream: demos, not memos. ty to our sponsors! 🧠 CESAR - Intelligent automation built for AI 💻 Cursor - The best way to code with AI Full episode on yt:

claire vo 🖤

92,220 views • 4 months ago

THIS GUY VIBE CODED A FULL CAPYBARA FOOD DELIVERY GAME IN 2 WEEKS WITH CLAUDE CODE you play as a capybara delivering food on a bike. orders stack on the back, you have a phone with apps in-game and the whole delivery system is realistic 2 weeks, zero game dev experience, and ENTIRELY AI generated the full stack: > claude code for all the code > three.js for the 3D engine > suno for original music > elevenlabs for sound effects and voice > GPT images-2 and grok for textures and illustrations > tripo3d for generating all the 3D assets the cinematics are all in-game too. he asked claude to build a cinematic editor with timeline controls, camera animation, and transitions. then he just placed the cameras himself his workflow was more planning than coding (obviously): > come up with the core mechanic > plan every feature using claude /plan mode > generate assets with AI tools > spend most of his time on the final polish, prop placement, and making the design feel right he said the human part is what most vibe coded games are missing. AI can generate everything but having taste for what looks good and what feels right is still on you the game is playable right now in the browser this is what vibe coding is actually capable of in the game dev space right now a year ago this would have taken a small team of developers, a sound designer, and an artist working together for months now one person with no experience can ship a polished playable game with story, music, and mechanics in 14 days the tools keep getting better and the barrier to making real games keeps getting lower

THIS GUY VIBE CODED A FULL CAPYBARA FOOD DELIVERY GAME IN 2 WEEKS WITH CLAUDE CODE you play as a capybara delivering food on a bike. orders stack on the back, you have a phone with apps in-game and the whole delivery system is realistic 2 weeks, zero game dev experience, and ENTIRELY AI generated the full stack: > claude code for all the code > three.js for the 3D engine > suno for original music > elevenlabs for sound effects and voice > GPT images-2 and grok for textures and illustrations > tripo3d for generating all the 3D assets the cinematics are all in-game too. he asked claude to build a cinematic editor with timeline controls, camera animation, and transitions. then he just placed the cameras himself his workflow was more planning than coding (obviously): > come up with the core mechanic > plan every feature using claude /plan mode > generate assets with AI tools > spend most of his time on the final polish, prop placement, and making the design feel right he said the human part is what most vibe coded games are missing. AI can generate everything but having taste for what looks good and what feels right is still on you the game is playable right now in the browser this is what vibe coding is actually capable of in the game dev space right now a year ago this would have taken a small team of developers, a sound designer, and an artist working together for months now one person with no experience can ship a polished playable game with story, music, and mechanics in 14 days the tools keep getting better and the barrier to making real games keeps getting lower

Om Patel

241,709 views • 4 months ago

THIS GUY CONNECTED CLAUDE VOICE MODE TO CLAUDE CODE AND NOW HE CODES BY TALKING INTO HIS AIRPODS while doing whatever he wants he uses Apple Reminders as a bridge between the two he talks into his AirPods, voice mode puts the prompt into a reminders list, Claude Code checks every 60 seconds and picks up the task AND it starts working on it back at his desk. walk outside. brainstorm with voice. code writes itself on your computer at home. he said he does his best thinking while walking and this lets him act on it instantly without pulling out his phone or sitting down. not a developer btw and he vibe coded the whole bridge system too. this is what hands-free vibe coding actually looks like

THIS GUY CONNECTED CLAUDE VOICE MODE TO CLAUDE CODE AND NOW HE CODES BY TALKING INTO HIS AIRPODS while doing whatever he wants he uses Apple Reminders as a bridge between the two he talks into his AirPods, voice mode puts the prompt into a reminders list, Claude Code checks every 60 seconds and picks up the task AND it starts working on it back at his desk. walk outside. brainstorm with voice. code writes itself on your computer at home. he said he does his best thinking while walking and this lets him act on it instantly without pulling out his phone or sitting down. not a developer btw and he vibe coded the whole bridge system too. this is what hands-free vibe coding actually looks like

Om Patel

151,281 views • 5 months ago

Claude Code just got it's biggest upgrade yet The desktop app is now by far the best way to be building apps with AI, even better than the CLI In this video I cover every single change and a few workflows for vibe coding faster than ever, even if you've never coded before:

Claude Code just got it's biggest upgrade yet The desktop app is now by far the best way to be building apps with AI, even better than the CLI In this video I cover every single change and a few workflows for vibe coding faster than ever, even if you've never coded before:

Alex Finn

86,902 views • 5 months ago

Boris Cherny and Bun's creator live-coded on stage at Anthropic's conference. They shipped 3 production PRs. The audience watched. "This entire thing was one prompt, and that just ran for 30 minutes." In 32 minutes, Bun's creator walks through the setup running his repo while he sleeps. > AI bots arguing 30 rounds on every PR > a bot that out-commits Bun's creator > Bun being rewritten in Rust by Claude > the image library Claude built to beat sharp The bot writes the code. The human merges the suggestions. None of this worked three months ago.

Boris Cherny and Bun's creator live-coded on stage at Anthropic's conference. They shipped 3 production PRs. The audience watched. "This entire thing was one prompt, and that just ran for 30 minutes." In 32 minutes, Bun's creator walks through the setup running his repo while he sleeps. > AI bots arguing 30 rounds on every PR > a bot that out-commits Bun's creator > Bun being rewritten in Rust by Claude > the image library Claude built to beat sharp The bot writes the code. The human merges the suggestions. None of this worked three months ago.

Phosphen

96,948 views • 3 months ago

I couldn't believe the results of this benchmarking test. I blind-tested 6 frontier models — Sonnet 5, Opus 4.8, Fable 5, GPT 5.5, GLM 5.2, and Kimi 2.5 — on knowledge work, not engineering. Writing. Analysis. Design. Vibe coding. Subagent simulations. The stuff we actually do all day. Same prompts, each model running its own subagent, every output graded blind before the labels were revealed. The results: → GLM 5.2 (the dirt-cheap open-source model from China) took first → Sonnet 5 took second, beating Fable 5 for knowledge work → Opus 4.8 got whooped Then I had Composer 2.5 judge every output independently — and it picked Fable 5 almost across the board. My blind picks and the AI judge completely disagreed. Full breakdown, method, and prompts in the video below. Which model are you running as your daily driver right now?

I couldn't believe the results of this benchmarking test. I blind-tested 6 frontier models — Sonnet 5, Opus 4.8, Fable 5, GPT 5.5, GLM 5.2, and Kimi 2.5 — on knowledge work, not engineering. Writing. Analysis. Design. Vibe coding. Subagent simulations. The stuff we actually do all day. Same prompts, each model running its own subagent, every output graded blind before the labels were revealed. The results: → GLM 5.2 (the dirt-cheap open-source model from China) took first → Sonnet 5 took second, beating Fable 5 for knowledge work → Opus 4.8 got whooped Then I had Composer 2.5 judge every output independently — and it picked Fable 5 almost across the board. My blind picks and the AI judge completely disagreed. Full breakdown, method, and prompts in the video below. Which model are you running as your daily driver right now?

JJ Englert

10,737 views • 2 months ago

Grok 4.5 is a "Wow!" moment. 🤯 > Opus 4.8 & GPT-5.5 level on benchmarks > Costs less than Sonnet 5 Is that real? Hard to believe. Added Grok 4.5 as an implementer agent in fable-advisor. It replaces Sonnet 5. Use Fable as the orchestrator and a combo of: 1. Grok 4.5 2. Opus 4.8 3. GPT-5.5 As implementer agents. Uses the Grok Build CLI so if you log in with an X premium account you don't have to pay API fees.

Grok 4.5 is a "Wow!" moment. 🤯 > Opus 4.8 & GPT-5.5 level on benchmarks > Costs less than Sonnet 5 Is that real? Hard to believe. Added Grok 4.5 as an implementer agent in fable-advisor. It replaces Sonnet 5. Use Fable as the orchestrator and a combo of: 1. Grok 4.5 2. Opus 4.8 3. GPT-5.5 As implementer agents. Uses the Grok Build CLI so if you log in with an X premium account you don't have to pay API fees.

Dan McAteer

191,618 views • 2 months ago

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A 6-AGENT ASSEMBLY LINE WHERE ONE PROMPT GOES IN AND A FINISHED PR COMES OUT your name shows up in this process exactly once - at the very end, for 5 minutes. prompt → planner → coder → tester → critic → scribe → PR Opus 5 plans once - a bad plan executed by five perfect agents is still a bad result. Sonnet 5 runs 3 parallel lanes - and they only work because the planner made the steps independent. tests loop until green and red goes back to the coder - the critic never sees a broken build. Opus 5 as the critic rejects to the plan, not the code - tests ask "does it run", the critic asks "should it exist". the PR description writes itself from the trace, not from memory - cut this seat and you get 8 PRs nobody can tell apart. one human step in the whole thing: approve or send back - 5 minutes instead of 5 hours. save the setup - 2 models, 6 seats, 2 return paths ↓

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A 6-AGENT ASSEMBLY LINE WHERE ONE PROMPT GOES IN AND A FINISHED PR COMES OUT your name shows up in this process exactly once - at the very end, for 5 minutes. prompt → planner → coder → tester → critic → scribe → PR Opus 5 plans once - a bad plan executed by five perfect agents is still a bad result. Sonnet 5 runs 3 parallel lanes - and they only work because the planner made the steps independent. tests loop until green and red goes back to the coder - the critic never sees a broken build. Opus 5 as the critic rejects to the plan, not the code - tests ask "does it run", the critic asks "should it exist". the PR description writes itself from the trace, not from memory - cut this seat and you get 8 PRs nobody can tell apart. one human step in the whole thing: approve or send back - 5 minutes instead of 5 hours. save the setup - 2 models, 6 seats, 2 return paths ↓

Sprytix

39,283 views • 1 month ago

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

18,509 views • 16 days ago

THIS KID HAS BEEN CODING SINCE KINDERGARTEN AND JUST BUILT A ROCKET WHILE HIS MOM EXPLAINS TO THE INTERNET WHY THAT'S NOT SURPRISING 6 years on Yuan Bian Cheng, C++ competition tracks and a homemade rocket on the desk - and his mom is calmly responding to people who believe he builds rockets but refuse to believe he also takes coding classes. The comments said Python is too basic for someone building rockets. She explained the platform goes all the way to C++ competitive programming - and the classes don't replace the real work, they build the foundation underneath it. He builds at home to practice. He takes classes to fill the gaps. Most people pick one or the other. He's been doing both since he was 5.

THIS KID HAS BEEN CODING SINCE KINDERGARTEN AND JUST BUILT A ROCKET WHILE HIS MOM EXPLAINS TO THE INTERNET WHY THAT'S NOT SURPRISING 6 years on Yuan Bian Cheng, C++ competition tracks and a homemade rocket on the desk - and his mom is calmly responding to people who believe he builds rockets but refuse to believe he also takes coding classes. The comments said Python is too basic for someone building rockets. She explained the platform goes all the way to C++ competitive programming - and the classes don't replace the real work, they build the foundation underneath it. He builds at home to practice. He takes classes to fill the gaps. Most people pick one or the other. He's been doing both since he was 5.

Cortex

16,383 views • 3 months ago

i gave the exact same prompt to Opus 5 and Fable 5 and here's what came out Opus 5 dropped yesterday and my feed was instantly full of comparison posts but i wanted to check it myself so i gave it one task build 3d Flappy Bird first thing everyone was saying Opus is 2x cheaper than Fable BUT.. building the game on Max effort cost me 250k tokens and 1 hour on Opus and 130k on Fable but Fable did it in half the time Opus gave me volume control plus 3 separate graphics presets to choose from, Fable gave none of that in Opus the environment shifts dynamically as you play in Fable it's basically the same frame the whole run maybe a day/night change here and there graphics, animations, glow, all of it goes to Opus and now that limits jumped 50% for the near future while Fable went paid for me the call is obvious right now Opus same prompt start to finish zero changes to code or commands want it? i can send it over

i gave the exact same prompt to Opus 5 and Fable 5 and here's what came out Opus 5 dropped yesterday and my feed was instantly full of comparison posts but i wanted to check it myself so i gave it one task build 3d Flappy Bird first thing everyone was saying Opus is 2x cheaper than Fable BUT.. building the game on Max effort cost me 250k tokens and 1 hour on Opus and 130k on Fable but Fable did it in half the time Opus gave me volume control plus 3 separate graphics presets to choose from, Fable gave none of that in Opus the environment shifts dynamically as you play in Fable it's basically the same frame the whole run maybe a day/night change here and there graphics, animations, glow, all of it goes to Opus and now that limits jumped 50% for the near future while Fable went paid for me the call is obvious right now Opus same prompt start to finish zero changes to code or commands want it? i can send it over

savip.

45,764 views • 1 month ago

My honest take on Kimi.ai K3 👀 As soon as I got access to Kimi, I put it through the exact same 3D football stadium challenge I had previously given Claude Fable 5. Fable 5 finished in under an hour. Kimi took almost 3 hours 🥵 At first, that was a very bad impression but i decided to see what's taking it this much of time. It was running E2E tests, validating desktop, tablet, and mobile, taking screenshots, finding failures, fixing them, even adapting for low end hardware and low FPS before moving on. All these that Fable 5 never did. None of it because it wasn't able to run this WebGL app on a headless browser. Kimi also shipped a clean React + Three.js codebase with proper components while Fable, as you might have checked codebase, generated one big HTML file with everything stuffed in. With all of this happening, it felt like I was doing more "Vibe Coding" with Fable 5 and more "Vibe Engineering" with Kimi K3. It feels like it's spending more time making sure the code actually works and easily scalable. Really impressed so far. More Kimi K3 experiments coming soon. Code (Kimi): Code (Fable): Live (Kimi hosted):

My honest take on Kimi.ai K3 👀 As soon as I got access to Kimi, I put it through the exact same 3D football stadium challenge I had previously given Claude Fable 5. Fable 5 finished in under an hour. Kimi took almost 3 hours 🥵 At first, that was a very bad impression but i decided to see what's taking it this much of time. It was running E2E tests, validating desktop, tablet, and mobile, taking screenshots, finding failures, fixing them, even adapting for low end hardware and low FPS before moving on. All these that Fable 5 never did. None of it because it wasn't able to run this WebGL app on a headless browser. Kimi also shipped a clean React + Three.js codebase with proper components while Fable, as you might have checked codebase, generated one big HTML file with everything stuffed in. With all of this happening, it felt like I was doing more "Vibe Coding" with Fable 5 and more "Vibe Engineering" with Kimi K3. It feels like it's spending more time making sure the code actually works and easily scalable. Really impressed so far. More Kimi K3 experiments coming soon. Code (Kimi): Code (Fable): Live (Kimi hosted):

The Bugged Dev

579,283 views • 2 months ago

vibe vibers NFTs' post-launch mechanics narrated: 1. 95% of the NFT trading fees will be used to buy a basket of top tokenized AI stocks 2. vibe vibers will have levels, and as you use vibe/vibe launchpad, refer others, and do other quests, they will gain XP 3. all the tokenized AI stocks bought will be airdropped to the vibe vibers 4. higher levels of vibe vibers will get exponentially more of the tokenized AI stocks 5. as you level em up, they will get more from the pool automatically 6. when trading vibe vibers, levels will stay with them, so charging them will be an EV+ play for your NFTs 7. this is besides vibe vibers being eligible for an initial gift of new SFUND airdrop on RH, when charged 8. with this mechanic, vibe vibers will directly boost the ecosystem activity for everybody, as those who wanna charge them will grow the launchpad more + since there is auto buyback/burns in all tokens at vibe/vibe, activity growth will be EV+ for everyone

vibe vibers NFTs' post-launch mechanics narrated: 1. 95% of the NFT trading fees will be used to buy a basket of top tokenized AI stocks 2. vibe vibers will have levels, and as you use vibe/vibe launchpad, refer others, and do other quests, they will gain XP 3. all the tokenized AI stocks bought will be airdropped to the vibe vibers 4. higher levels of vibe vibers will get exponentially more of the tokenized AI stocks 5. as you level em up, they will get more from the pool automatically 6. when trading vibe vibers, levels will stay with them, so charging them will be an EV+ play for your NFTs 7. this is besides vibe vibers being eligible for an initial gift of new SFUND airdrop on RH, when charged 8. with this mechanic, vibe vibers will directly boost the ecosystem activity for everybody, as those who wanna charge them will grow the launchpad more + since there is auto buyback/burns in all tokens at vibe/vibe, activity growth will be EV+ for everyone

Meta Alchemist

209,172 views • 21 days ago

Boris Cherny (Claude Code's creator): I deleted my IDE in November and hasn't opened it since. I writes more code than ever. his actual words on stage: I don't prompt Claude anymore. I have loops that are running. They're the ones prompting Claude. My job is to write loops. the progression he described: → a year ago: writing code by hand with autocomplete → then: running 5-10 Claudes in parallel, prompting each one → now: he doesn't prompt at all - he writes the loops that prompt Claude what it's already done inside Anthropic: • ~3x more code shipped per engineer (he says that number is already outdated and higher) • Cowork - a full product - built in ~8 days, 100% with Claude Code • designers, the finance guy, even the chief of staff now ship code his advice to founders: give everyone as many tokens as possible, and underfund every project on purpose - 2 engineers + a pile of tokens instead of 4. the roles are melting into one "builder." Watch this, than read the article below

Boris Cherny (Claude Code's creator): I deleted my IDE in November and hasn't opened it since. I writes more code than ever. his actual words on stage: I don't prompt Claude anymore. I have loops that are running. They're the ones prompting Claude. My job is to write loops. the progression he described: → a year ago: writing code by hand with autocomplete → then: running 5-10 Claudes in parallel, prompting each one → now: he doesn't prompt at all - he writes the loops that prompt Claude what it's already done inside Anthropic: • ~3x more code shipped per engineer (he says that number is already outdated and higher) • Cowork - a full product - built in ~8 days, 100% with Claude Code • designers, the finance guy, even the chief of staff now ship code his advice to founders: give everyone as many tokens as possible, and underfund every project on purpose - 2 engineers + a pile of tokens instead of 4. the roles are melting into one "builder." Watch this, than read the article below

Morty

136,663 views • 3 months ago

GAME DEVELOPERS ARE OFFICIALLY COOKED this guy vibe coded a full pixel pirate sailing game that runs in the browser with opus 4.8 you sail a ship, engage in naval combat, explore the open sea, and interact with other ships works on mobile too a few years ago this would have been a full indie studio project with a team of artists, a sound designer, and 6 months of development now it's one person with claude code and a weekend game studios charging $40 for pixel art games while vibecoders are shipping them for free in the browser the barrier to making real games is completely gone

GAME DEVELOPERS ARE OFFICIALLY COOKED this guy vibe coded a full pixel pirate sailing game that runs in the browser with opus 4.8 you sail a ship, engage in naval combat, explore the open sea, and interact with other ships works on mobile too a few years ago this would have been a full indie studio project with a team of artists, a sound designer, and 6 months of development now it's one person with claude code and a weekend game studios charging $40 for pixel art games while vibecoders are shipping them for free in the browser the barrier to making real games is completely gone

Om Patel

80,432 views • 3 months ago