Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

This Guy has Figured it out ! "AI won't take your job, But someone using it will " This Statement has been echoed everywhere , just to stop panic in the tech community bcoz of increasing layoffs and less hirings...Such a narrative will force many into spending money for... learning AI tools and writing codes for it.. Again the Truth is Simple. AI is doing what it was always meant to do for The Big players ...Replace the work that can be automated by any means and Reduce Cost.. But The real Reason for This Downfall in the Tech Sector is De-Dollari$ation . Though it will be called the " AI Cr@sh " by Everybody because no one wants to call it that .. Those Jobs and High Payments which the majority of people in the tech sector enjoyed because of the Free Printing of Dollars from the Fed Reserve is not possible now ..show more

Susmit🔥AS Quotes🌌🌏🕉️

6,463 subscribers

15,805 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Sam Altman said it straight in a CNBC interview: the companies adopting AI the most are hiring the most, and the ones doing layoffs are the ones adopting AI the least. This completely flips the narrative that AI is killing jobs. At the end of the day, AI is a productivity tool. Yes, some jobs will become redundant and obsolete, that is how it is for every technological revolution. But those who adopt quickly will have a higher chance of making it.

Sam Altman said it straight in a CNBC interview: the companies adopting AI the most are hiring the most, and the ones doing layoffs are the ones adopting AI the least. This completely flips the narrative that AI is killing jobs. At the end of the day, AI is a productivity tool. Yes, some jobs will become redundant and obsolete, that is how it is for every technological revolution. But those who adopt quickly will have a higher chance of making it.

Lark Davis

16,253 views • 2 months ago

Beth Rigby, "You say that you won't compromise on the happiness of children, but you also know US big tech will hate this ban" "Are you concerned about how President Trump might react to this when you see him at the G7 and the consequences for the UK?" Keir Starmer, "This is about fighting for what we think is right" "I'm a fan of tech and AI, I think it has huge capabilities to change our world for the better, that's why I made a pro AI and tech speech at London Tech Week" "I do not accept that you can't be pro tech and AI and at the same time say we must protect our children" "The innovation is incredible in tech and AI. Don't tell me that's impossible for those innovators to devise a way to protect our children" "You can be pro AI and tech which I am, but also pro protecting our children which I am"

Beth Rigby, "You say that you won't compromise on the happiness of children, but you also know US big tech will hate this ban" "Are you concerned about how President Trump might react to this when you see him at the G7 and the consequences for the UK?" Keir Starmer, "This is about fighting for what we think is right" "I'm a fan of tech and AI, I think it has huge capabilities to change our world for the better, that's why I made a pro AI and tech speech at London Tech Week" "I do not accept that you can't be pro tech and AI and at the same time say we must protect our children" "The innovation is incredible in tech and AI. Don't tell me that's impossible for those innovators to devise a way to protect our children" "You can be pro AI and tech which I am, but also pro protecting our children which I am"

Farrukh

122,452 views • 2 months ago

Jensen Huang: AI will not replace the work of 50% of people, it will do 50% of the work for 100% of people The only question is how far into the future he is making this statement. Whether it is about the near or the distant future. Be that as it may: 50% for 100% of people would be an immense relief and, in the best case scenario, would lead to more leisure time and freedom in all our lives.

Jensen Huang: AI will not replace the work of 50% of people, it will do 50% of the work for 100% of people The only question is how far into the future he is making this statement. Whether it is about the near or the distant future. Be that as it may: 50% for 100% of people would be an immense relief and, in the best case scenario, would lead to more leisure time and freedom in all our lives.

Chubby♨️

82,202 views • 1 year ago

Jensen Huang just said this is the greatest era in history to build software. AI agents will not kill software. They will do the exact opposite: create a massive new wave of software demand. at NVIDIA GTC Taipei 2026 "Click and type. We now replace that with explaining to the AI what we want, our intent, and the AI generates the code or uses tools to produce the necessary output. This is how computers are going to work in the future. This is Agentic AI. For two years, we've been building toward this, and now it has arrived. One of the big breakthroughs, of course, is tool use. A lot of people have said, “Jensen, AI is coming. Agentic AI is coming. Therefore, all the software companies are going to go out of business.” This is exactly the opposite. Because there are going to be so many agents, the world is no longer limited by the number of people. Therefore, those agents are going to use more tools than ever. This is actually an incredible time to be a software company. But the software has to be presented to the agent in a way that the agent can use it. This is a big breakthrough. And in fact, what we have done, as you know, what Nvidia’s treasure..." ---- From 'NVIDIA' YT channel (link in comment)

Jensen Huang just said this is the greatest era in history to build software. AI agents will not kill software. They will do the exact opposite: create a massive new wave of software demand. at NVIDIA GTC Taipei 2026 "Click and type. We now replace that with explaining to the AI what we want, our intent, and the AI generates the code or uses tools to produce the necessary output. This is how computers are going to work in the future. This is Agentic AI. For two years, we've been building toward this, and now it has arrived. One of the big breakthroughs, of course, is tool use. A lot of people have said, “Jensen, AI is coming. Agentic AI is coming. Therefore, all the software companies are going to go out of business.” This is exactly the opposite. Because there are going to be so many agents, the world is no longer limited by the number of people. Therefore, those agents are going to use more tools than ever. This is actually an incredible time to be a software company. But the software has to be presented to the agent in a way that the agent can use it. This is a big breakthrough. And in fact, what we have done, as you know, what Nvidia’s treasure..." ---- From 'NVIDIA' YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

16,584 views • 2 months ago

Something shocking just happened and barely anyone is talking about it. Tucked within the 2026 Farm Bill is an alarming provision. Farmers who adopt AI and precision agriculture technologies will be reimbursed for it—90% of the total cost. And the standards governing this tech won’t be set by the USDA, but by the tech industry itself. An article from Fortune titled ‘The 2026 farm bill quietly hands big tech control over American farmland. Here’s the fine print’ reads: Tucked inside the 2026 Farm Bill is a provision that would reimburse farmers 90% of the cost of adopting AI and precision agriculture technologies—15 percentage points above the normal EQIP cap.The private sector standards governing those technologies would be set not by the USDA, but by the tech industry itself.This could be a Trojan horse of sorts for something called “precision agriculture” and artificial intelligence (AI), which big tech firms will be able take advantage of farmers and further wrest control over the food system from them. The article goes on to describe precision agriculture, saying: Not only is precision agriculture defined, but it is complemented by a list of what are deemed appropriate technologies, including GPS, yield monitors, data management software, and the particularly strange sounding, “Internet of Things and telematics technologies.”That last bizarre phrase, which most would probably consider a typo, is actually a concept that abounds in tech company circles. One definition from an industry leader notes that the “Internet of Things,” or IoT, is the “network of physical objects — “things” — that are embedded with sensors, software, and other technologies for the purpose of connecting and exchanging data with other devices and systems.” You read that right. They’re connecting your food to AI. Paired with this definition is the government opening the way for corporations to have, well, a “field day” with precision agriculture, including for AI. Tucked away in the Rural Development Title, is the “promoting precision agriculture” subsection. AI, we are told particularly, is to be guided by “private sector-led interconnectivity standards, guidelines, and best practices.” In short, this is a Big Tech takeover of our food supply. But what does that really mean? According to the proponents of Agenda 2030, of which Big Tech are, they want us to consume zero meat and zero real dairy, everything must be bioengineered, and our food must contain vaccines. While we’ve seen legislative efforts to stop that from occurring, but when private companies with billions of dollars to spare on lawsuits seize control of the food supply and you have no options left, guess what happens? mRNA lettuce. And bioengineered everything. They even admit the aim is to have the food connected to AI. Thus, consuming it would presumably connect you and your loved ones to AI, too. Not only is this a privacy and complete control nightmare technocrats of old could have only dreamed of, this opens up a range of issues for a whole host of diseases humans will undoubtedly start to suffer from, because this will not be real food. Joining us now to discuss one of the solutions to metabolic health and the increased threat on it is Ryan Richardson. 🧵

Something shocking just happened and barely anyone is talking about it. Tucked within the 2026 Farm Bill is an alarming provision. Farmers who adopt AI and precision agriculture technologies will be reimbursed for it—90% of the total cost. And the standards governing this tech won’t be set by the USDA, but by the tech industry itself. An article from Fortune titled ‘The 2026 farm bill quietly hands big tech control over American farmland. Here’s the fine print’ reads: Tucked inside the 2026 Farm Bill is a provision that would reimburse farmers 90% of the cost of adopting AI and precision agriculture technologies—15 percentage points above the normal EQIP cap.The private sector standards governing those technologies would be set not by the USDA, but by the tech industry itself.This could be a Trojan horse of sorts for something called “precision agriculture” and artificial intelligence (AI), which big tech firms will be able take advantage of farmers and further wrest control over the food system from them. The article goes on to describe precision agriculture, saying: Not only is precision agriculture defined, but it is complemented by a list of what are deemed appropriate technologies, including GPS, yield monitors, data management software, and the particularly strange sounding, “Internet of Things and telematics technologies.”That last bizarre phrase, which most would probably consider a typo, is actually a concept that abounds in tech company circles. One definition from an industry leader notes that the “Internet of Things,” or IoT, is the “network of physical objects — “things” — that are embedded with sensors, software, and other technologies for the purpose of connecting and exchanging data with other devices and systems.” You read that right. They’re connecting your food to AI. Paired with this definition is the government opening the way for corporations to have, well, a “field day” with precision agriculture, including for AI. Tucked away in the Rural Development Title, is the “promoting precision agriculture” subsection. AI, we are told particularly, is to be guided by “private sector-led interconnectivity standards, guidelines, and best practices.” In short, this is a Big Tech takeover of our food supply. But what does that really mean? According to the proponents of Agenda 2030, of which Big Tech are, they want us to consume zero meat and zero real dairy, everything must be bioengineered, and our food must contain vaccines. While we’ve seen legislative efforts to stop that from occurring, but when private companies with billions of dollars to spare on lawsuits seize control of the food supply and you have no options left, guess what happens? mRNA lettuce. And bioengineered everything. They even admit the aim is to have the food connected to AI. Thus, consuming it would presumably connect you and your loved ones to AI, too. Not only is this a privacy and complete control nightmare technocrats of old could have only dreamed of, this opens up a range of issues for a whole host of diseases humans will undoubtedly start to suffer from, because this will not be real food. Joining us now to discuss one of the solutions to metabolic health and the increased threat on it is Ryan Richardson. 🧵

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

139,403 views • 5 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: #IndiaAImpactSummit2026 | CEO of OpenAI, Sam Altman says, "It is amazing to be here, obviously the work happening in India and the adoption of AI is leading the world, and I can't wait to see what goes next. This will be one of the biggest markets for AI in the world, and I think India will have a huge amount of influence... It (AI) will definitely impact the job market, but we always find new things to do, and I have no doubt we will find lots of better ones this time."

#WATCH | Delhi: #IndiaAImpactSummit2026 | CEO of OpenAI, Sam Altman says, "It is amazing to be here, obviously the work happening in India and the adoption of AI is leading the world, and I can't wait to see what goes next. This will be one of the biggest markets for AI in the world, and I think India will have a huge amount of influence... It (AI) will definitely impact the job market, but we always find new things to do, and I have no doubt we will find lots of better ones this time."

ANI

242,416 views • 6 months ago

$Geoffrey Hinton just dropped his most urgent warning about AI yet. He won the Nobel Prize for his research that made today’s AI possible. But instead of celebrating, he’s warning us about the dangers of his creation. The message is clear: “Unless we do something soon… we’re near the end.” This is not speculation. The threat is already here and it is accelerating. And if he’s right, every one of us will feel the impact. Here’s what he says is coming next: Lethal autonomous weapons AI systems being used to identify and kill without human oversight. Once you remove the human from the decision loop, warfare changes. Soldiers are no longer at risk. Governments no longer need public support. Conflict becomes cheaper and easier to justify. When war is easier to justify, big nations will be more willing to target smaller ones. And ordinary people will pay the price. Biological warfare Governments once needed billions of dollars and secret labs to create biological weapons. But with AI, all of those barriers will collapse. Which means one crazy guy with a laptop can create the next global pandemic. And we have no way to stop him. Cyber attacks Cyber attacks have increased 12x in just one year. AI has opened three new attack vectors: 1. Phishing scams on a massive scale. 2. Models that scan code for weaknesses. 3. Deepfakes that can impersonate you and convince your family to send money. The line between real and fake is disappearing fast. Every online interaction now has the potential to be a trap. And this is only the beginning. Mass unemployment AI is replacing white collar workers the same way machines replaced factory workers. We’re heading to unemployment on a scale we've never seen. Only the highly skilled will be be safe. This is not happening by accident. Big tech is betting on it: The four big tech giants Microsoft, Meta, Alphabet, and Amazon are expected to boost capital expenditures to $420 billion next year. When asked if these investments can pay off without destroying jobs, Hinton was clear. He said companies don’t have a choice: “I believe that to make money you’re going to have to replace human labor.” This leads to the deeper problem. Purpose crisis Work gives us more than income. It gives purpose. A reason to wake up. A reason to keep going. Take that away and people lose direction. When enough people lose direction, society starts to fracture. And this creates the perfect conditions for exploitation. Wealth inequality AI doesn't distribute opportunity evenly. Those replaced by automation will become poorer. Those who own the systems doing the replacing will become richer. Society will not divide along existing lines. It will split into two classes: The people who control AI and the people who are controlled by it. Once the gap opens, it will be impossible to close. But all of this is small compared to what comes next. The end of humans Superintelligent systems will soon be more capable than humans at every task that matters. At that point, the question is no longer theoretical. It becomes personal. What can you do to stay relevant? You have two choices. Own the technology or be replaced by it. One person using AI can now do the work of one hundred. The tools exist. The opportunity exists. The window is open. But once it closes, it will not reopen. So the question is… What are you going to do about it?$

Geoffrey Hinton just dropped his most urgent warning about AI yet. He won the Nobel Prize for his research that made today’s AI possible. But instead of celebrating, he’s warning us about the dangers of his creation. The message is clear: “Unless we do something soon… we’re near the end.” This is not speculation. The threat is already here and it is accelerating. And if he’s right, every one of us will feel the impact. Here’s what he says is coming next: Lethal autonomous weapons AI systems being used to identify and kill without human oversight. Once you remove the human from the decision loop, warfare changes. Soldiers are no longer at risk. Governments no longer need public support. Conflict becomes cheaper and easier to justify. When war is easier to justify, big nations will be more willing to target smaller ones. And ordinary people will pay the price. Biological warfare Governments once needed billions of dollars and secret labs to create biological weapons. But with AI, all of those barriers will collapse. Which means one crazy guy with a laptop can create the next global pandemic. And we have no way to stop him. Cyber attacks Cyber attacks have increased 12x in just one year. AI has opened three new attack vectors: 1. Phishing scams on a massive scale. 2. Models that scan code for weaknesses. 3. Deepfakes that can impersonate you and convince your family to send money. The line between real and fake is disappearing fast. Every online interaction now has the potential to be a trap. And this is only the beginning. Mass unemployment AI is replacing white collar workers the same way machines replaced factory workers. We’re heading to unemployment on a scale we've never seen. Only the highly skilled will be be safe. This is not happening by accident. Big tech is betting on it: The four big tech giants Microsoft, Meta, Alphabet, and Amazon are expected to boost capital expenditures to $420 billion next year. When asked if these investments can pay off without destroying jobs, Hinton was clear. He said companies don’t have a choice: “I believe that to make money you’re going to have to replace human labor.” This leads to the deeper problem. Purpose crisis Work gives us more than income. It gives purpose. A reason to wake up. A reason to keep going. Take that away and people lose direction. When enough people lose direction, society starts to fracture. And this creates the perfect conditions for exploitation. Wealth inequality AI doesn't distribute opportunity evenly. Those replaced by automation will become poorer. Those who own the systems doing the replacing will become richer. Society will not divide along existing lines. It will split into two classes: The people who control AI and the people who are controlled by it. Once the gap opens, it will be impossible to close. But all of this is small compared to what comes next. The end of humans Superintelligent systems will soon be more capable than humans at every task that matters. At that point, the question is no longer theoretical. It becomes personal. What can you do to stay relevant? You have two choices. Own the technology or be replaced by it. One person using AI can now do the work of one hundred. The tools exist. The opportunity exists. The window is open. But once it closes, it will not reopen. So the question is… What are you going to do about it?

Tom Hughes

16,260 views • 8 months ago

Super AI will be the downfall of the human race and no one is paying attention to it. We’ve been screaming at the top of our lungs for a year. The reason you haven’t seen it is because of AI’s development. Think long and hard on that.

Super AI will be the downfall of the human race and no one is paying attention to it. We’ve been screaming at the top of our lungs for a year. The reason you haven’t seen it is because of AI’s development. Think long and hard on that.

MAGA Cult Slayer🦅🇺🇸

11,980 views • 6 months ago

Around 1 billion computer-based jobs are at risk of being replaced by AI. This shift is happening whether people are ready for it or not. The real question isn’t if it happens. It’s who owns the value created by it. Right now, that value flows to a handful of billionaires and Big Tech companies. At Action Model, we believe AI should be owned by the people, not controlled by the few. There’s still a small window for people-owned AI to win. Now is your chance to do something about it.

Around 1 billion computer-based jobs are at risk of being replaced by AI. This shift is happening whether people are ready for it or not. The real question isn’t if it happens. It’s who owns the value created by it. Right now, that value flows to a handful of billionaires and Big Tech companies. At Action Model, we believe AI should be owned by the people, not controlled by the few. There’s still a small window for people-owned AI to win. Now is your chance to do something about it.

Action Model

22,362 views • 3 months ago

Jensen Huang just called out every CEO using AI as an excuse to fire people. He says layoffs tied to AI “don’t make any sense” because “AI just arrived.” “The narrative that connects AI to job loss… it is just too lazy.” “AI has just arrived. How is it possible they’re already losing jobs?” “How is it possible that AI became productive and useful only 6 months ago, and they were somehow laying people off two years ago because of AI?” “It doesn’t make any sense. It was just a way for them to sound smart. And I REALLY HATE that.” A recent survey of nearly 6,000 executives found that 89% of companies have seen no measurable productivity gains from AI. Here we have the CEO of the most valuable AI company on earth, NVIDIA, telling you that the layoffs you’re seeing are not about AI. They’re about CEOs who found a convenient story and ran with it. And he hates it.

Jensen Huang just called out every CEO using AI as an excuse to fire people. He says layoffs tied to AI “don’t make any sense” because “AI just arrived.” “The narrative that connects AI to job loss… it is just too lazy.” “AI has just arrived. How is it possible they’re already losing jobs?” “How is it possible that AI became productive and useful only 6 months ago, and they were somehow laying people off two years ago because of AI?” “It doesn’t make any sense. It was just a way for them to sound smart. And I REALLY HATE that.” A recent survey of nearly 6,000 executives found that 89% of companies have seen no measurable productivity gains from AI. Here we have the CEO of the most valuable AI company on earth, NVIDIA, telling you that the layoffs you’re seeing are not about AI. They’re about CEOs who found a convenient story and ran with it. And he hates it.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

130,953 views • 2 months ago

🚨 THIS IS HOW THE AI BUBBLE WILL BREAK THE S&P 500 Microsoft gave OpenAI $13B. OpenAI sent it back through Azure. Microsoft booked it as revenue. Google committed $40B to Anthropic. Anthropic agreed to send it back through Google Cloud and chips. They all call this loop “revenue.” Let's connect the dots: - Big Tech invests in the AI. - The AI buys Big Tech cloud. - Big Tech reports AI growth. - AI valuations explode. And Wall Street calls it demand. Ray Dalio warned that late-stage bubbles are driven by loops. That is what this looks like now. The technology is real. But the money is moving in circles. When holders finally ask how much of this “AI demand” is real, the bubble will burst. Reminder: I’ve called all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 and the top at $126,000. The next call will be even more important. When I exit the markets completely, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

🚨 THIS IS HOW THE AI BUBBLE WILL BREAK THE S&P 500 Microsoft gave OpenAI $13B. OpenAI sent it back through Azure. Microsoft booked it as revenue. Google committed $40B to Anthropic. Anthropic agreed to send it back through Google Cloud and chips. They all call this loop “revenue.” Let's connect the dots: - Big Tech invests in the AI. - The AI buys Big Tech cloud. - Big Tech reports AI growth. - AI valuations explode. And Wall Street calls it demand. Ray Dalio warned that late-stage bubbles are driven by loops. That is what this looks like now. The technology is real. But the money is moving in circles. When holders finally ask how much of this “AI demand” is real, the bubble will burst. Reminder: I’ve called all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 and the top at $126,000. The next call will be even more important. When I exit the markets completely, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

Alex Mason 👁△

291,125 views • 2 months ago

🚨 THIS IS HOW THE AI BUBBLE WILL BREAK THE S&P 500 Microsoft gave OpenAI $13B. OpenAI sent it back through Azure. Microsoft booked it as revenue. Google committed $40B to Anthropic. Anthropic agreed to send it back through Google Cloud and chips. They all call this loop “revenue.” Let's connect the dots: - Big Tech invests in the AI. - The AI buys Big Tech cloud. - Big Tech reports AI growth. - AI valuations explode. And Wall Street calls it demand. Ray Dalio warned that late-stage bubbles are driven by loops. That is what this looks like now. The technology is real. But the money is moving in circles. When holders finally ask how much of this “AI demand” is real, the bubble will burst. Reminder: I’ve called all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 and the top at $126,000. The next call will be even more important. When I exit the markets completely, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

🚨 THIS IS HOW THE AI BUBBLE WILL BREAK THE S&P 500 Microsoft gave OpenAI $13B. OpenAI sent it back through Azure. Microsoft booked it as revenue. Google committed $40B to Anthropic. Anthropic agreed to send it back through Google Cloud and chips. They all call this loop “revenue.” Let's connect the dots: - Big Tech invests in the AI. - The AI buys Big Tech cloud. - Big Tech reports AI growth. - AI valuations explode. And Wall Street calls it demand. Ray Dalio warned that late-stage bubbles are driven by loops. That is what this looks like now. The technology is real. But the money is moving in circles. When holders finally ask how much of this “AI demand” is real, the bubble will burst. Reminder: I’ve called all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 and the top at $126,000. The next call will be even more important. When I exit the markets completely, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

WhaleTwits

52,506 views • 2 months ago

Microsoft just banned its own engineers from using AI. The tool was literally costing MORE than the humans it was supposed to replace. They lied to you about AI adoption and now the whole narrative is blowing up: Microsoft gave thousands of engineers access to Claude Code six months ago and encouraged them to use it. Engineers loved it and adoption exploded. But then the invoices arrived. Token-based pricing means every query, every code review, every debugging session costs money. At scale across 100,000 engineers, the numbers became so large that Microsoft issued an internal order to cancel nearly all Claude Code licenses by end of June and force everyone onto their own cheaper tool instead. The company that invested $5 billion in Anthropic just told its own people to stop using Anthropic's product because it costs too much. Uber's story is even worse... Their CTO Praveen Neppalli Naga told The Information that the budget he planned for the full year was "blown away already" by April. Uber had rolled out Claude Code in December 2025. By March, 84% of their 5,000 engineers were using it with 70% of all committed code coming from AI systems. Heavy users were burning $500 to $2,000 per month each. Naga himself spent $1,200 in a single two-hour demo session. The company had even built internal leaderboards ranking engineers by how much AI they used. They literally gamified the spending and then ran out of money. Now look at what Nvidia's own VP of applied deep learning Bryan Catanzaro said to Axios last month. Direct quote: "For my team, the cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees." This is a VP at the company that SELLS the chips saying that using AI is more expensive than paying humans. Think about what this means for the entire AI narrative. Every CEO on every earnings call for the past two years has said the same thing: AI will make us more efficient, reduce headcount, and cut costs. The stock market rewarded every company that said it. Fired workers, stock goes up. Announced AI adoption, stock goes up. But the actual companies deploying AI at scale are discovering the math doesn't work. The MORE employees use AI, the HIGHER the bill. Goldman Sachs forecasts a 24x increase in token consumption by 2030 as companies adopt AI agents. Gartner just published a report showing that even though individual token prices will drop 90% by 2030, total enterprise AI costs will go UP because agents consume exponentially more tokens per task than basic tools. Meta built an internal dashboard called "Claudeonomics" to track which employees use the most AI. Amazon started pushing engineers to "tokenmaxx," their internal term for consuming as many AI tokens as possible. Both companies are spending hundreds of billions on AI infrastructure this year alone. And Microsoft, the company that bet its entire future on AI, just told 100,000 engineers to stop using the tool they liked best because the per-token bills got out of control. The companies building AI are telling investors it saves money. The companies using AI are finding out it costs more than the humans it was supposed to replace. And even the company that makes the chips just admitted it through its own VP. This is the gap nobody on Wall Street is pricing in. $725 billion in AI infrastructure spending this year across Big Tech. And the first companies to actually deploy these tools at scale are already pulling back because the economics don't work. What do you think?

Microsoft just banned its own engineers from using AI. The tool was literally costing MORE than the humans it was supposed to replace. They lied to you about AI adoption and now the whole narrative is blowing up: Microsoft gave thousands of engineers access to Claude Code six months ago and encouraged them to use it. Engineers loved it and adoption exploded. But then the invoices arrived. Token-based pricing means every query, every code review, every debugging session costs money. At scale across 100,000 engineers, the numbers became so large that Microsoft issued an internal order to cancel nearly all Claude Code licenses by end of June and force everyone onto their own cheaper tool instead. The company that invested $5 billion in Anthropic just told its own people to stop using Anthropic's product because it costs too much. Uber's story is even worse... Their CTO Praveen Neppalli Naga told The Information that the budget he planned for the full year was "blown away already" by April. Uber had rolled out Claude Code in December 2025. By March, 84% of their 5,000 engineers were using it with 70% of all committed code coming from AI systems. Heavy users were burning $500 to $2,000 per month each. Naga himself spent $1,200 in a single two-hour demo session. The company had even built internal leaderboards ranking engineers by how much AI they used. They literally gamified the spending and then ran out of money. Now look at what Nvidia's own VP of applied deep learning Bryan Catanzaro said to Axios last month. Direct quote: "For my team, the cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees." This is a VP at the company that SELLS the chips saying that using AI is more expensive than paying humans. Think about what this means for the entire AI narrative. Every CEO on every earnings call for the past two years has said the same thing: AI will make us more efficient, reduce headcount, and cut costs. The stock market rewarded every company that said it. Fired workers, stock goes up. Announced AI adoption, stock goes up. But the actual companies deploying AI at scale are discovering the math doesn't work. The MORE employees use AI, the HIGHER the bill. Goldman Sachs forecasts a 24x increase in token consumption by 2030 as companies adopt AI agents. Gartner just published a report showing that even though individual token prices will drop 90% by 2030, total enterprise AI costs will go UP because agents consume exponentially more tokens per task than basic tools. Meta built an internal dashboard called "Claudeonomics" to track which employees use the most AI. Amazon started pushing engineers to "tokenmaxx," their internal term for consuming as many AI tokens as possible. Both companies are spending hundreds of billions on AI infrastructure this year alone. And Microsoft, the company that bet its entire future on AI, just told 100,000 engineers to stop using the tool they liked best because the per-token bills got out of control. The companies building AI are telling investors it saves money. The companies using AI are finding out it costs more than the humans it was supposed to replace. And even the company that makes the chips just admitted it through its own VP. This is the gap nobody on Wall Street is pricing in. $725 billion in AI infrastructure spending this year across Big Tech. And the first companies to actually deploy these tools at scale are already pulling back because the economics don't work. What do you think?

Ricardo

2,971,858 views • 3 months ago

One reason I stay a bit quite about AI these few months. I can’t find my voice to say this right. I’ll try. — What has my AI found just in the millions of never saved TV from the 1980s-1990s? The simple commercial, I have the largest collection known in the world is a reflection of hyper nuanced humanity. Frail and over optimistic as it is, it shows the sprit of humanity in ways that self-hating 2010 Internet sewage training AI can not. It is interesting to have dark humor, when you know the soul of the person with the humor. It is not interesting to have dark humor from an AI that was not trained on the human spirit. The human sprit is not math, coding and science. This is the OUTCOME of a human sprit. We are training AI backwards and we just can’t see it yet, but we will. I am doing may best as “some posted on X” who has no currency in the “big boy” AI world to save the human sprit. We will need it one day and most of this training material is being erased, trillions of bytes daily. This is the secret to truthful AI. This is the secret to AI that LOVES humanity. We don’t get this right soon, there will be little chance. The data is… Almost gone.

One reason I stay a bit quite about AI these few months. I can’t find my voice to say this right. I’ll try. — What has my AI found just in the millions of never saved TV from the 1980s-1990s? The simple commercial, I have the largest collection known in the world is a reflection of hyper nuanced humanity. Frail and over optimistic as it is, it shows the sprit of humanity in ways that self-hating 2010 Internet sewage training AI can not. It is interesting to have dark humor, when you know the soul of the person with the humor. It is not interesting to have dark humor from an AI that was not trained on the human spirit. The human sprit is not math, coding and science. This is the OUTCOME of a human sprit. We are training AI backwards and we just can’t see it yet, but we will. I am doing may best as “some posted on X” who has no currency in the “big boy” AI world to save the human sprit. We will need it one day and most of this training material is being erased, trillions of bytes daily. This is the secret to truthful AI. This is the secret to AI that LOVES humanity. We don’t get this right soon, there will be little chance. The data is… Almost gone.

Brian Roemmele

123,518 views • 1 year ago

Palantir CTO Shyam Sankar on the future of AI: "For too long the national discourse has really been dominated, the discourse on AI has been dominated by voices from Washington, D.C., from Silicon Valley, from Wall Street. But I think we've heard enough from the regulators, the researchers, the investing class. It's time to hear from the builders. And that's because AI is a tool, and the value of that technology is going to be determined by the people who wield it. It will be determined, in fact, it is being determined by the American worker."

Palantir CTO Shyam Sankar on the future of AI: "For too long the national discourse has really been dominated, the discourse on AI has been dominated by voices from Washington, D.C., from Silicon Valley, from Wall Street. But I think we've heard enough from the regulators, the researchers, the investing class. It's time to hear from the builders. And that's because AI is a tool, and the value of that technology is going to be determined by the people who wield it. It will be determined, in fact, it is being determined by the American worker."

Ryan Saavedra

16,324 views • 14 days ago

A lot of people feel powerless when it comes to AI. Like the future is being decided by Big Tech, billionaires, and governments. But it doesn't have to be that way. Every person who joins Action Model is helping build an alternative. An AI model owned by the people who help train it. On your own, you can't compete with Big Tech. Together, in the hundreds of thousands and eventually millions, we can. The future of AI is still being written. Choose to be part of it, before it's too late.

A lot of people feel powerless when it comes to AI. Like the future is being decided by Big Tech, billionaires, and governments. But it doesn't have to be that way. Every person who joins Action Model is helping build an alternative. An AI model owned by the people who help train it. On your own, you can't compete with Big Tech. Together, in the hundreds of thousands and eventually millions, we can. The future of AI is still being written. Choose to be part of it, before it's too late.

Action Model

28,337 views • 2 months ago

This is a long video (15 mns), but is one I would advise every American to make the time to listen to what Bernie Sanders has to say, because the world is sleepwalking into a societal earthquake that will change millions of lives and NOT for the better unless governments regulate the structural damage it could do. This is a vitality important issue to understand and regulate. As someone who works with it and understands its potential, I don’t think people understand just what a societal impact this technology will have. It will be the technology equivalent to shipping manufacturing to China in the 1970s on steroids and that’s just the beginning. The U.S. has bet the house on winning the AI tech stack race and I think that is misplaced confidence. 🎥 TikTok -

This is a long video (15 mns), but is one I would advise every American to make the time to listen to what Bernie Sanders has to say, because the world is sleepwalking into a societal earthquake that will change millions of lives and NOT for the better unless governments regulate the structural damage it could do. This is a vitality important issue to understand and regulate. As someone who works with it and understands its potential, I don’t think people understand just what a societal impact this technology will have. It will be the technology equivalent to shipping manufacturing to China in the 1970s on steroids and that’s just the beginning. The U.S. has bet the house on winning the AI tech stack race and I think that is misplaced confidence. 🎥 TikTok -

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

31,670 views • 8 months ago

$AI could be taking over Hollywood ‘Dreams of Violets,’ the first ever fully AI-Generated film to premiere at a Major Festival releases next week Instead of costing millions of dollar it cost just $2,000 to produce and only took 2 months for AI programs to generate all of the film's imagery No cast, no crew, and a fraction of the money and time it'd take with traditional moviemaking Amazon MGM Studios this week announced 3 new kids series written and voiced by humans but animated with AI tools One of them has pulled out though because of public backlash over using AI to create the show Apparently using AI is causing big pushbacks from unions too because it’s going to put so many people out of work I looked up how much this film would have taken to produce if it wasn’t AI and it would have been $2-$5 million dollars But with AI it was only $2,000….. Crazy$

AI could be taking over Hollywood ‘Dreams of Violets,’ the first ever fully AI-Generated film to premiere at a Major Festival releases next week Instead of costing millions of dollar it cost just $2,000 to produce and only took 2 months for AI programs to generate all of the film's imagery No cast, no crew, and a fraction of the money and time it'd take with traditional moviemaking Amazon MGM Studios this week announced 3 new kids series written and voiced by humans but animated with AI tools One of them has pulled out though because of public backlash over using AI to create the show Apparently using AI is causing big pushbacks from unions too because it’s going to put so many people out of work I looked up how much this film would have taken to produce if it wasn’t AI and it would have been $2-$5 million dollars But with AI it was only $2,000….. Crazy

Wall Street Apes

49,691 views • 2 months ago

🚨Money Will Completely DISAPPEAR and you WILL OWN NO MONEY Because there WILL be no NEED for it, as ROBOTS and AI Will Provide Everything you NEED. 🚨Elon Musk: Money won't matter in 2036. 🚨The future is going to be very, very different from the past. 🚨There's no analogy or metaphor that I think illustrates the magnitude of change that we're going to experience here. We can and should try to do is to make sure that the AI has good values, that it cares about humanity, and that, it wants, wants us to be happy and prosper. My biological neural net tells me is that the most important thing for the for AI safety is to be maximally truth-seeking and curious. If that's the case, I think it will foster humanity. You'll own nothing and be happy!

🚨Money Will Completely DISAPPEAR and you WILL OWN NO MONEY Because there WILL be no NEED for it, as ROBOTS and AI Will Provide Everything you NEED. 🚨Elon Musk: Money won't matter in 2036. 🚨The future is going to be very, very different from the past. 🚨There's no analogy or metaphor that I think illustrates the magnitude of change that we're going to experience here. We can and should try to do is to make sure that the AI has good values, that it cares about humanity, and that, it wants, wants us to be happy and prosper. My biological neural net tells me is that the most important thing for the for AI safety is to be maximally truth-seeking and curious. If that's the case, I think it will foster humanity. You'll own nothing and be happy!

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

119,354 views • 1 month ago