Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

“This idea that if we regulate AI, that China will win, is not true. And the way that we know that is because China regulates AI. They have the most regulation of their AI than any country in the world. And they're moving very, very fast. They're almost at...

40,885 görüntüleme • 18 saat önce •via X (Twitter)

23 Yorum

Rational profil fotoğrafı
Rational17 saat önce

@RubenGallego Hysterical! “Isn’t China just so sincere & thoughtful!” My God you gullible idiots.

Anton profil fotoğrafı
Anton14 saat önce

This sounds like something a CCP operative would say, you’re not fooling anybody chief

Taylor profil fotoğrafı
Taylor15 saat önce

This is literally all fake news.

The DEEP Marcellus profil fotoğrafı
The DEEP Marcellus14 saat önce

Please delete this tweet…you couldn’t be further from the truth here….

Matt Bartholomew profil fotoğrafı
Matt Bartholomew14 saat önce

I’m surprised you’d quote yourself showing that your argument is terrible. Don’t speak of regulation if you aren’t being consistent in its meaning. Also, you say that China is moving fast yet imply that it isn’t moving fast enough to surpass the US based companies? Competition is inherently self-serving, so you advocate withdrawing from the competition, correct?

Kate O'Hehir profil fotoğrafı
Kate O'Hehir17 saat önce

Yes, bad bad China. If it's made in China it must be bad. They built green energy wind farms in Mongolia and solar farms in the Gobi desert AND THEN BUILT THE DATA CENTERS UP NORTH IN UNPOPULATED AREAS next to the green energy providing ALL the AI needs without touching exisiting electrical systems that power the rest of the country.

_relativity _ profil fotoğrafı
_relativity _13 saat önce

How many Chinese women has this guy slept with or married, and how many seeds has he sown to come up with such a brain-dead take? It reads like a textbook case of ideological castration through genetic conquest. The sheer submissiveness here is just incredible.🫴

hidewatchlaugh profil fotoğrafı
hidewatchlaugh14 saat önce

He's worried a competitor or open source will beat him. He does not care about China in the least.

Mark profil fotoğrafı
Mark13 saat önce

What an Incompetent moron

Weaver profil fotoğrafı
Weaver13 saat önce

There is zero logical reason to create a new regulatory regime for ai. ZERO!

Asa Hidmark profil fotoğrafı
Asa Hidmark13 saat önce

US AI are already regulated by EU AI act GPAI and by california law since February 2026. US AI is already regulated

kdrecon profil fotoğrafı
kdrecon14 saat önce

China has "moved fast" in part because they have drafted off US innovation.

Egbert Aethelbald profil fotoğrafı
Egbert Aethelbald13 saat önce

No, China is not "almost at where we are." This is dumb guy stuff.

soph s, profil fotoğrafı
soph s,13 saat önce

Well said!

RamenFreak profil fotoğrafı
RamenFreak14 saat önce

Gee, I wonder who you work for?

𝕏𝕏𝕏𝕏𝕏𝕏 - e/acc profil fotoğrafı
𝕏𝕏𝕏𝕏𝕏𝕏 - e/acc13 saat önce

I can't believe someone posting something that dumb can get on TV. 🤦‍♂️

Pascal J profil fotoğrafı
Pascal J13 saat önce

"Must gives us all your money" or we lose geopolitical power is always a fraud. Must bankrupt the US or Iran wins is another version of this fraud. Far greater than 10% extinction risk, because AI race is actually a Skynet race. No one should care where you buy productivity.

TM🌕 profil fotoğrafı
TM🌕13 saat önce

Have you seen how the u.s. and the west does regulation? Chinas regulation is we want this build it and dont say anything bad about the ccp. The U.S., I want to build this oh well that will be a 10 year review we will get back to you

Steve profil fotoğrafı
Steve13 saat önce

LOL China’s regulations are not the regulations you want here in the US, but I feel you know that 😂🖕

Steve Stanton profil fotoğrafı
Steve Stanton13 saat önce

Wut? There is no meaningful distinction between govt as a regulator, govt as a shareholder, and govt as a manager in China. The regulations will be whatever the government wants them to be... For whatever purpose the government prioritizes... Whether it's the success of the company, the advancement of a particular technology, the benefit of the Chinese people, the defense of the mainland and the party, international strategic considerations, or product safety. Yes of course there are vibrant private and public companies. Literally every company of any significant size has representation by the party. And every significant decision made by those companies is made with the knowledge and tacit approval of the party. And anything done by these parties to embarrass China or the party... Whether the action was legal or not... Creates potentially serious consequences for the managers who took those actions (or inaction). Imagine if you gave Donald Trump a brand new "Department of Large Companies"... And he had board seats and Senior managers of his own choosing at every single large company in the United States... Public or private... As well as people inside every significant foreign company operating in the United States... And he could make any regulations he wanted on the fly without a comment period... At the same rate he makes executive orders... Without judicial review. And he could choose to selectively enforce these new regulations however, he wished... That is not too far from the current China model. Yes regulated But what does regulated mean? And is that a model you want to follow? At the advantage of this " department of large companies" approach... You gain the flexibility of making regulations in real time, adapting them dynamically and enforcing them selectively based on government discretion... So you do gain a nimbleness to dial up or dial down controls... And accelerate or decelerate the pacing... The disadvantage of course is that very few people would be happy with Trump controlling a " department of large companies"... And among the people who would be happy with that... Pretty much none of them would be happy with the other party controlling it in 2/6/10/14 years.

Dale profil fotoğrafı
Dale13 saat önce

China regulates political content only! They’re a communist country, you dumbass, of course they regulate that🤬

Kevlar profil fotoğrafı
Kevlar13 saat önce

Yours is also a self serving argument. So no credibility for you.

Christopher James profil fotoğrafı
Christopher James13 saat önce

How much does communist China pay you to push their propaganda?

Benzer Videolar