正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

THIS IS A BLATANT LIE: They are gaslighting us again. Under the Second Amendment and MN Stat. 624.714, permit holders may legally carry firearms in public, including during protests. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that public carry is a constitutional right. Carrying a firearm does not legally constitute "inciting

Brian Krassenstein

996,575 subscribers

70,487 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Is this right? A woman can’t carry pepper spray legally, but Sikhs can carry large swords or kirpans in public spaces.

Is this right? A woman can’t carry pepper spray legally, but Sikhs can carry large swords or kirpans in public spaces.

Harman Singh Kapoor

66,355 次观看 • 29 天前

Is it legally acceptable to carry a sword on a public train and openly threaten passengers? Or is this privilege reserved only for BJP supporters,carry weapons wherever they want and intimidate people without consequences? #गोवर्धनपरिक्रमा_केअनसुनेरहस्य

Is it legally acceptable to carry a sword on a public train and openly threaten passengers? Or is this privilege reserved only for BJP supporters,carry weapons wherever they want and intimidate people without consequences? #गोवर्धनपरिक्रमा_केअनसुनेरहस्य

Jotti Verma

24,126 次观看 • 13 天前

Members of the public carry a man fatally shot during protests in the Nairobi CBD

Members of the public carry a man fatally shot during protests in the Nairobi CBD

Daily Nation

30,095 次观看 • 1 年前

"Carrying a firearm in public A firearm can only be carried in public if it is in a holster or similar holder, or in a rucksack. The firearm must be completely covered and the person carrying it must be able to control it." 🤷‍♂️

"Carrying a firearm in public A firearm can only be carried in public if it is in a holster or similar holder, or in a rucksack. The firearm must be completely covered and the person carrying it must be able to control it." 🤷‍♂️

Peché Africa 🇿🇦

117,004 次观看 • 1 年前

NOWHERE in the Constitution does it say that a court has a "right" to "temporarily remove a firearm." Americans have the right to due process and your gun confiscation orders are not exempt! #SHALLNOTBEINFRINGED

NOWHERE in the Constitution does it say that a court has a "right" to "temporarily remove a firearm." Americans have the right to due process and your gun confiscation orders are not exempt! #SHALLNOTBEINFRINGED

Gun Owners of America

17,103 次观看 • 3 年前

🚨Biden Says Supreme Court is "Not a Normal Court" After Race-Based College Admissions are Ruled Unconstitutional Today, the Supreme Court ruled that race-based admissions to college are unconstitutional and instructed colleges to stop considering the race of applicants for admission. The 6-3 majority stated that the two programs "unavoidably employ race in a negative manner" and "involve racial stereotyping" in a way that violates the Constitution. Biden responded to this decision by stating "discrimination still exists in America," and added that "today's decision does not change that." As Biden was leaving the room, a reporter asked if the court is "broken," to which Biden replied "this is not a normal court." Agree with Biden's Criticism of the Supreme Court? Does the court’s decision promote RACIAL EQUALITY, or does it have the opposite effect?

🚨Biden Says Supreme Court is "Not a Normal Court" After Race-Based College Admissions are Ruled Unconstitutional Today, the Supreme Court ruled that race-based admissions to college are unconstitutional and instructed colleges to stop considering the race of applicants for admission. The 6-3 majority stated that the two programs "unavoidably employ race in a negative manner" and "involve racial stereotyping" in a way that violates the Constitution. Biden responded to this decision by stating "discrimination still exists in America," and added that "today's decision does not change that." As Biden was leaving the room, a reporter asked if the court is "broken," to which Biden replied "this is not a normal court." Agree with Biden's Criticism of the Supreme Court? Does the court’s decision promote RACIAL EQUALITY, or does it have the opposite effect?

Mario Nawfal

9,893,075 次观看 • 3 年前

BREAKING: Kilmar Abrego Garcia still isn’t home and the Trump administration keeps ignoring court orders. Once again they were chastised by Judge Xinis today. We are on the verge of a Constitutional Crisis and Trump’s inaction might lead to the death of Garcia. Remember, Garcia was legally living in the US, is a loving father and husband, who has no criminal record.

BREAKING: Kilmar Abrego Garcia still isn’t home and the Trump administration keeps ignoring court orders. Once again they were chastised by Judge Xinis today. We are on the verge of a Constitutional Crisis and Trump’s inaction might lead to the death of Garcia. Remember, Garcia was legally living in the US, is a loving father and husband, who has no criminal record.

Ed Krassenstein

268,487 次观看 • 1 年前

Although this is an obvious improvement, it is still unconstitutional. A license/permit is permission to engage in an activity that would otherwise be unlawful. Concealing a firearm is protected under the Second Amendment. Thus, any law infringing upon that right is facially invalid and can be disregarded as such. When faced with an unconstitutional law, you "may ignore it and engage with impunity in the exercise of the right" which the law infringes upon. See 𝘚𝘩𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘩 𝘷. 𝘊𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘉𝘪𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘩𝘢𝘮.

Although this is an obvious improvement, it is still unconstitutional. A license/permit is permission to engage in an activity that would otherwise be unlawful. Concealing a firearm is protected under the Second Amendment. Thus, any law infringing upon that right is facially invalid and can be disregarded as such. When faced with an unconstitutional law, you "may ignore it and engage with impunity in the exercise of the right" which the law infringes upon. See 𝘚𝘩𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘩 𝘷. 𝘊𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘉𝘪𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘩𝘢𝘮.

Witsit

10,517 次观看 • 1 年前

Is it legal to call an ICE agent a “neo-Nazi piece of shit, un-American mother fucker”? Yes, explains that it’s your First Amendment right. The Supreme Court protects offensive profanity in political expression directed at officers of the law. FIGHT ICE LEGALLY:

Is it legal to call an ICE agent a “neo-Nazi piece of shit, un-American mother fucker”? Yes, explains that it’s your First Amendment right. The Supreme Court protects offensive profanity in political expression directed at officers of the law. FIGHT ICE LEGALLY:

Joe Walsh

29,760 次观看 • 16 天前

The Tokyo High Court has ruled that Japan's ban on same-sex marriage is constitutional. The court found on November 27 that Japan's refusal to legalise same-sex marriage was constitutional, with a definitive ruling expected to be brought to the Supreme Court in the coming months.

The Tokyo High Court has ruled that Japan's ban on same-sex marriage is constitutional. The court found on November 27 that Japan's refusal to legalise same-sex marriage was constitutional, with a definitive ruling expected to be brought to the Supreme Court in the coming months.

PinkNews

26,645 次观看 • 7 个月前

This is the incident that ultimately led to the effective five-year prison sentence handed to Julius Malema, after he was found guilty of discharging a firearm in public. The court ruled that the offence was serious and warranted direct imprisonment, despite arguments that he is a first-time offender. WATCH:

This is the incident that ultimately led to the effective five-year prison sentence handed to Julius Malema, after he was found guilty of discharging a firearm in public. The court ruled that the offence was serious and warranted direct imprisonment, despite arguments that he is a first-time offender. WATCH:

Yusuf Abramjee

58,134 次观看 • 2 个月前

BREAKING: Trump brags about disobeying the U.S. courts, including a 9-0 order by the Supreme Court of the United States. "I judge wasn't elected to do that. I was elected to do that." THIS IS A CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS!

BREAKING: Trump brags about disobeying the U.S. courts, including a 9-0 order by the Supreme Court of the United States. "I judge wasn't elected to do that. I was elected to do that." THIS IS A CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS!

Ed Krassenstein

1,640,763 次观看 • 1 年前

The Supreme Court has ruled that the public has the right to camp anywhere on Dartmoor without landowner permission. Five judges unanimously dismissed a legal challenge by two landowners, who said it's vital they have the power "to ask irresponsible and anti-social campers to move".

The Supreme Court has ruled that the public has the right to camp anywhere on Dartmoor without landowner permission. Five judges unanimously dismissed a legal challenge by two landowners, who said it's vital they have the power "to ask irresponsible and anti-social campers to move".

Channel 4 News

20,568 次观看 • 1 年前

BREAKING: Supreme Court In UK Delivers Big Blow To The Left: Court Rules Trans Women Not Legally Biological Women In a major victory for common sense, the Supreme Court in the UK unanimously ruled that "woman" and "sex" in the Equality Act 2010 mean men are men and women are women. The decision, shuts down the left’s push for self identification, ensuring biological men who claim they are women cannot claim legal status as biological women. This ruling, sparked by a challenge from For Women Scotland, protects women’s spaces like bathrooms and sports from woke overreach. The court emphasized that sex is binary; male or female, restoring clarity to a law muddied by leftists. As J.K. Rowling celebrated, this is a win for women and girls across the UK and beyond.

BREAKING: Supreme Court In UK Delivers Big Blow To The Left: Court Rules Trans Women Not Legally Biological Women In a major victory for common sense, the Supreme Court in the UK unanimously ruled that "woman" and "sex" in the Equality Act 2010 mean men are men and women are women. The decision, shuts down the left’s push for self identification, ensuring biological men who claim they are women cannot claim legal status as biological women. This ruling, sparked by a challenge from For Women Scotland, protects women’s spaces like bathrooms and sports from woke overreach. The court emphasized that sex is binary; male or female, restoring clarity to a law muddied by leftists. As J.K. Rowling celebrated, this is a win for women and girls across the UK and beyond.

MAGA Resource

473,993 次观看 • 1 年前

ROAD RAGE: Two motorists, including a taxi driver, were involved in a physical altercation on Mandume Ndemufayo Avenue in Windhoek at around 07h30 this morning, during which one of the men was seen drawing a firearm and pointing it at his opponent. The circumstances that triggered the confrontation remain unclear. Under Namibia's Arms and Ammunition Act 7 of 1996, the unlawful display of a firearm in public may result in arrest, criminal prosecution and the revocation of a firearm licence. Videos: Contributed.

ROAD RAGE: Two motorists, including a taxi driver, were involved in a physical altercation on Mandume Ndemufayo Avenue in Windhoek at around 07h30 this morning, during which one of the men was seen drawing a firearm and pointing it at his opponent. The circumstances that triggered the confrontation remain unclear. Under Namibia's Arms and Ammunition Act 7 of 1996, the unlawful display of a firearm in public may result in arrest, criminal prosecution and the revocation of a firearm licence. Videos: Contributed.

Namibian Sun

113,937 次观看 • 11 天前

🚨BREAKING: Another ICE agent has been caught on video illegally pointing a firearm at a U.S. citizen, in Lemonwood, California. In the video, an unmarked ICE vehicle is stopped in the middle of the road… no vehicles are in front of it, and nothing is preventing them from driving forward. Instead of continuing to drive down the road, the ICE agent is blocking a pickup truck from turning, while pointing a gun, out their window, directly at the driver of that truck. The truck backs up, but the agent still keeps the firearm pointed at the driver. Only AFTER people begin honking their horns does the agent lower their weapon, and drive away. The law states that pointing a firearm at someone is considered a serious threat of deadly force. It is only justified when an officer has an objectively reasonable belief that they are facing an immediate threat of death, or serious bodily harm. It is not legally allowed to be used to control traffic, and it is not legally allowed to be used as intimidation. And that’s exactly why this video should be alarming to you. The agent is not boxed in… nothing is preventing them from driving down the street. Meanwhile, the agent is the one preventing the truck from continuing its turn. And they are doing so while pointing a gun at the driver. So, the question becomes… What immediate threat justified the ICE agent to stop their car, and point a firearm at a U.S. citizen? Because we are seeing a growing pattern, of publicly documented incidents, where ICE agents point firearms at legal observers, journalists, and bystanders during enforcement encounters… when they are not facing an immediate threat of death. That is not how public safety works. Pointing a firearm at someone is one of the most serious things an officer can do, because it instantly escalates an encounter into a potential deadly force situation. And that is exactly why the law is supposed to restrict it. Every unnecessary drawn gun increases the risk of a wrong judgment, and a fatal mistake. And when there is no accountability, for when that line gets crossed, drawing a gun because the normal for every situation. And when it becomes normal, more people’s lives are put in danger.

🚨BREAKING: Another ICE agent has been caught on video illegally pointing a firearm at a U.S. citizen, in Lemonwood, California. In the video, an unmarked ICE vehicle is stopped in the middle of the road… no vehicles are in front of it, and nothing is preventing them from driving forward. Instead of continuing to drive down the road, the ICE agent is blocking a pickup truck from turning, while pointing a gun, out their window, directly at the driver of that truck. The truck backs up, but the agent still keeps the firearm pointed at the driver. Only AFTER people begin honking their horns does the agent lower their weapon, and drive away. The law states that pointing a firearm at someone is considered a serious threat of deadly force. It is only justified when an officer has an objectively reasonable belief that they are facing an immediate threat of death, or serious bodily harm. It is not legally allowed to be used to control traffic, and it is not legally allowed to be used as intimidation. And that’s exactly why this video should be alarming to you. The agent is not boxed in… nothing is preventing them from driving down the street. Meanwhile, the agent is the one preventing the truck from continuing its turn. And they are doing so while pointing a gun at the driver. So, the question becomes… What immediate threat justified the ICE agent to stop their car, and point a firearm at a U.S. citizen? Because we are seeing a growing pattern, of publicly documented incidents, where ICE agents point firearms at legal observers, journalists, and bystanders during enforcement encounters… when they are not facing an immediate threat of death. That is not how public safety works. Pointing a firearm at someone is one of the most serious things an officer can do, because it instantly escalates an encounter into a potential deadly force situation. And that is exactly why the law is supposed to restrict it. Every unnecessary drawn gun increases the risk of a wrong judgment, and a fatal mistake. And when there is no accountability, for when that line gets crossed, drawing a gun because the normal for every situation. And when it becomes normal, more people’s lives are put in danger.

Jesus Freakin Congress

230,245 次观看 • 8 天前

German public media is so biased they ask people if they “deny” Israel’s “right to exist”, a concept which does not exist under law

German public media is so biased they ask people if they “deny” Israel’s “right to exist”, a concept which does not exist under law

James Jackson

389,097 次观看 • 5 个月前

How epic would it be if Trumps ‘little secret’ is the Supreme Courts ruling on the Brunson case and it being made public by the Military and Supreme Court. Proving that Trump won the 2020 election in a landslide and overturning the 2020 election. Invalidating everything that the frauds known as Biden, Harris and congress have been doing in the last 4 years. Space force has it all, and the Brunson case can overturn it. The Supreme Court has already ruled in Trumps favour. Could this be the Trump card? Whatever happens, expect fireworks.

How epic would it be if Trumps ‘little secret’ is the Supreme Courts ruling on the Brunson case and it being made public by the Military and Supreme Court. Proving that Trump won the 2020 election in a landslide and overturning the 2020 election. Invalidating everything that the frauds known as Biden, Harris and congress have been doing in the last 4 years. Space force has it all, and the Brunson case can overturn it. The Supreme Court has already ruled in Trumps favour. Could this be the Trump card? Whatever happens, expect fireworks.

The Yorkshire Lass

1,565,410 次观看 • 1 年前

🇩🇪 German NRW Interior Minister Reul admits that the purpose of a house search is to intimidate the public. It's not about finding evidence, the legally intended purpose of a search, but rather about sending a "clear message to the public" They’re intimidating Germans to not post against the narrative online. 1/

🇩🇪 German NRW Interior Minister Reul admits that the purpose of a house search is to intimidate the public. It's not about finding evidence, the legally intended purpose of a search, but rather about sending a "clear message to the public" They’re intimidating Germans to not post against the narrative online. 1/

Lord Bebo

36,504 次观看 • 8 个月前

🇰🇷🏫University Students Rise Up South Korea’s youth are furious. Student councils from 12 major universities across the country, including Yonsei University, Seoul National University, and Korea University, announced that they will launch simultaneous picket protests and issue a joint declaration starting tomorrow, June 10. They emphasized that the right to vote is a fundamental constitutional right and a cornerstone of a democratic republic, condemning the infringement of this right by state institutions as a grave crisis. "We hereby solemnly declare that we shall not stay silent until the truth is fully disclosed and those responsible are punished to a degree that satisfies the public. We will forever remember this crisis and respond with utmost determination." - Park Ye-eun (Junior, Yeongnam University)

🇰🇷🏫University Students Rise Up South Korea’s youth are furious. Student councils from 12 major universities across the country, including Yonsei University, Seoul National University, and Korea University, announced that they will launch simultaneous picket protests and issue a joint declaration starting tomorrow, June 10. They emphasized that the right to vote is a fundamental constitutional right and a cornerstone of a democratic republic, condemning the infringement of this right by state institutions as a grave crisis. "We hereby solemnly declare that we shall not stay silent until the truth is fully disclosed and those responsible are punished to a degree that satisfies the public. We will forever remember this crisis and respond with utmost determination." - Park Ye-eun (Junior, Yeongnam University)

ViiV

93,991 次观看 • 25 天前