Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

THIS IS A BLATANT LIE: They are gaslighting us again. Under the Second Amendment and MN Stat. 624.714, permit holders may legally carry firearms in public, including during protests. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that public carry is a constitutional right. Carrying a firearm does not legally constitute "inciting

Brian Krassenstein

996,575 subscribers

70,487 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨Biden Says Supreme Court is "Not a Normal Court" After Race-Based College Admissions are Ruled Unconstitutional Today, the Supreme Court ruled that race-based admissions to college are unconstitutional and instructed colleges to stop considering the race of applicants for admission. The 6-3 majority stated that the two programs "unavoidably employ race in a negative manner" and "involve racial stereotyping" in a way that violates the Constitution. Biden responded to this decision by stating "discrimination still exists in America," and added that "today's decision does not change that." As Biden was leaving the room, a reporter asked if the court is "broken," to which Biden replied "this is not a normal court." Agree with Biden's Criticism of the Supreme Court? Does the court’s decision promote RACIAL EQUALITY, or does it have the opposite effect?

🚨Biden Says Supreme Court is "Not a Normal Court" After Race-Based College Admissions are Ruled Unconstitutional Today, the Supreme Court ruled that race-based admissions to college are unconstitutional and instructed colleges to stop considering the race of applicants for admission. The 6-3 majority stated that the two programs "unavoidably employ race in a negative manner" and "involve racial stereotyping" in a way that violates the Constitution. Biden responded to this decision by stating "discrimination still exists in America," and added that "today's decision does not change that." As Biden was leaving the room, a reporter asked if the court is "broken," to which Biden replied "this is not a normal court." Agree with Biden's Criticism of the Supreme Court? Does the court’s decision promote RACIAL EQUALITY, or does it have the opposite effect?

Mario Nawfal

9,893,212 views • 3 years ago

NOWHERE in the Constitution does it say that a court has a "right" to "temporarily remove a firearm." Americans have the right to due process and your gun confiscation orders are not exempt! #SHALLNOTBEINFRINGED

NOWHERE in the Constitution does it say that a court has a "right" to "temporarily remove a firearm." Americans have the right to due process and your gun confiscation orders are not exempt! #SHALLNOTBEINFRINGED

Gun Owners of America

17,108 views • 3 years ago

Although this is an obvious improvement, it is still unconstitutional. A license/permit is permission to engage in an activity that would otherwise be unlawful. Concealing a firearm is protected under the Second Amendment. Thus, any law infringing upon that right is facially invalid and can be disregarded as such. When faced with an unconstitutional law, you "may ignore it and engage with impunity in the exercise of the right" which the law infringes upon. See 𝘚𝘩𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘩 𝘷. 𝘊𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘉𝘪𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘩𝘢𝘮.

Although this is an obvious improvement, it is still unconstitutional. A license/permit is permission to engage in an activity that would otherwise be unlawful. Concealing a firearm is protected under the Second Amendment. Thus, any law infringing upon that right is facially invalid and can be disregarded as such. When faced with an unconstitutional law, you "may ignore it and engage with impunity in the exercise of the right" which the law infringes upon. See 𝘚𝘩𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘩 𝘷. 𝘊𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘉𝘪𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘩𝘢𝘮.

Witsit

10,525 views • 1 year ago

This is the incident that ultimately led to the effective five-year prison sentence handed to Julius Malema, after he was found guilty of discharging a firearm in public. The court ruled that the offence was serious and warranted direct imprisonment, despite arguments that he is a first-time offender. WATCH:

This is the incident that ultimately led to the effective five-year prison sentence handed to Julius Malema, after he was found guilty of discharging a firearm in public. The court ruled that the offence was serious and warranted direct imprisonment, despite arguments that he is a first-time offender. WATCH:

Yusuf Abramjee

58,134 views • 5 months ago

BREAKING: Supreme Court In UK Delivers Big Blow To The Left: Court Rules Trans Women Not Legally Biological Women In a major victory for common sense, the Supreme Court in the UK unanimously ruled that "woman" and "sex" in the Equality Act 2010 mean men are men and women are women. The decision, shuts down the left’s push for self identification, ensuring biological men who claim they are women cannot claim legal status as biological women. This ruling, sparked by a challenge from For Women Scotland, protects women’s spaces like bathrooms and sports from woke overreach. The court emphasized that sex is binary; male or female, restoring clarity to a law muddied by leftists. As J.K. Rowling celebrated, this is a win for women and girls across the UK and beyond.

BREAKING: Supreme Court In UK Delivers Big Blow To The Left: Court Rules Trans Women Not Legally Biological Women In a major victory for common sense, the Supreme Court in the UK unanimously ruled that "woman" and "sex" in the Equality Act 2010 mean men are men and women are women. The decision, shuts down the left’s push for self identification, ensuring biological men who claim they are women cannot claim legal status as biological women. This ruling, sparked by a challenge from For Women Scotland, protects women’s spaces like bathrooms and sports from woke overreach. The court emphasized that sex is binary; male or female, restoring clarity to a law muddied by leftists. As J.K. Rowling celebrated, this is a win for women and girls across the UK and beyond.

MAGA Resource

473,993 views • 1 year ago

Self-defense is not a theory in Florida. Constitutional carry. Stand Your Ground — and sheriffs who will look at a camera and say if you have to shoot, shoot until the threat stops. The wildest stat is how Chicago currently has 211 homicides this year, while Miami, Orlando, and Tampa only have 29 COMBINED.

Self-defense is not a theory in Florida. Constitutional carry. Stand Your Ground — and sheriffs who will look at a camera and say if you have to shoot, shoot until the threat stops. The wildest stat is how Chicago currently has 211 homicides this year, while Miami, Orlando, and Tampa only have 29 COMBINED.

American AF 🇺🇸

22,975 views • 1 month ago

ROAD RAGE: Two motorists, including a taxi driver, were involved in a physical altercation on Mandume Ndemufayo Avenue in Windhoek at around 07h30 this morning, during which one of the men was seen drawing a firearm and pointing it at his opponent. The circumstances that triggered the confrontation remain unclear. Under Namibia's Arms and Ammunition Act 7 of 1996, the unlawful display of a firearm in public may result in arrest, criminal prosecution and the revocation of a firearm licence. Videos: Contributed.

ROAD RAGE: Two motorists, including a taxi driver, were involved in a physical altercation on Mandume Ndemufayo Avenue in Windhoek at around 07h30 this morning, during which one of the men was seen drawing a firearm and pointing it at his opponent. The circumstances that triggered the confrontation remain unclear. Under Namibia's Arms and Ammunition Act 7 of 1996, the unlawful display of a firearm in public may result in arrest, criminal prosecution and the revocation of a firearm licence. Videos: Contributed.

Namibian Sun

117,266 views • 3 months ago

🚨BREAKING: Another ICE agent has been caught on video illegally pointing a firearm at a U.S. citizen, in Lemonwood, California. In the video, an unmarked ICE vehicle is stopped in the middle of the road… no vehicles are in front of it, and nothing is preventing them from driving forward. Instead of continuing to drive down the road, the ICE agent is blocking a pickup truck from turning, while pointing a gun, out their window, directly at the driver of that truck. The truck backs up, but the agent still keeps the firearm pointed at the driver. Only AFTER people begin honking their horns does the agent lower their weapon, and drive away. The law states that pointing a firearm at someone is considered a serious threat of deadly force. It is only justified when an officer has an objectively reasonable belief that they are facing an immediate threat of death, or serious bodily harm. It is not legally allowed to be used to control traffic, and it is not legally allowed to be used as intimidation. And that’s exactly why this video should be alarming to you. The agent is not boxed in… nothing is preventing them from driving down the street. Meanwhile, the agent is the one preventing the truck from continuing its turn. And they are doing so while pointing a gun at the driver. So, the question becomes… What immediate threat justified the ICE agent to stop their car, and point a firearm at a U.S. citizen? Because we are seeing a growing pattern, of publicly documented incidents, where ICE agents point firearms at legal observers, journalists, and bystanders during enforcement encounters… when they are not facing an immediate threat of death. That is not how public safety works. Pointing a firearm at someone is one of the most serious things an officer can do, because it instantly escalates an encounter into a potential deadly force situation. And that is exactly why the law is supposed to restrict it. Every unnecessary drawn gun increases the risk of a wrong judgment, and a fatal mistake. And when there is no accountability, for when that line gets crossed, drawing a gun because the normal for every situation. And when it becomes normal, more people’s lives are put in danger.

🚨BREAKING: Another ICE agent has been caught on video illegally pointing a firearm at a U.S. citizen, in Lemonwood, California. In the video, an unmarked ICE vehicle is stopped in the middle of the road… no vehicles are in front of it, and nothing is preventing them from driving forward. Instead of continuing to drive down the road, the ICE agent is blocking a pickup truck from turning, while pointing a gun, out their window, directly at the driver of that truck. The truck backs up, but the agent still keeps the firearm pointed at the driver. Only AFTER people begin honking their horns does the agent lower their weapon, and drive away. The law states that pointing a firearm at someone is considered a serious threat of deadly force. It is only justified when an officer has an objectively reasonable belief that they are facing an immediate threat of death, or serious bodily harm. It is not legally allowed to be used to control traffic, and it is not legally allowed to be used as intimidation. And that’s exactly why this video should be alarming to you. The agent is not boxed in… nothing is preventing them from driving down the street. Meanwhile, the agent is the one preventing the truck from continuing its turn. And they are doing so while pointing a gun at the driver. So, the question becomes… What immediate threat justified the ICE agent to stop their car, and point a firearm at a U.S. citizen? Because we are seeing a growing pattern, of publicly documented incidents, where ICE agents point firearms at legal observers, journalists, and bystanders during enforcement encounters… when they are not facing an immediate threat of death. That is not how public safety works. Pointing a firearm at someone is one of the most serious things an officer can do, because it instantly escalates an encounter into a potential deadly force situation. And that is exactly why the law is supposed to restrict it. Every unnecessary drawn gun increases the risk of a wrong judgment, and a fatal mistake. And when there is no accountability, for when that line gets crossed, drawing a gun because the normal for every situation. And when it becomes normal, more people’s lives are put in danger.

Jesus Freakin Congress

232,190 views • 3 months ago

🇰🇷🏫University Students Rise Up South Korea’s youth are furious. Student councils from 12 major universities across the country, including Yonsei University, Seoul National University, and Korea University, announced that they will launch simultaneous picket protests and issue a joint declaration starting tomorrow, June 10. They emphasized that the right to vote is a fundamental constitutional right and a cornerstone of a democratic republic, condemning the infringement of this right by state institutions as a grave crisis. "We hereby solemnly declare that we shall not stay silent until the truth is fully disclosed and those responsible are punished to a degree that satisfies the public. We will forever remember this crisis and respond with utmost determination." - Park Ye-eun (Junior, Yeongnam University)

🇰🇷🏫University Students Rise Up South Korea’s youth are furious. Student councils from 12 major universities across the country, including Yonsei University, Seoul National University, and Korea University, announced that they will launch simultaneous picket protests and issue a joint declaration starting tomorrow, June 10. They emphasized that the right to vote is a fundamental constitutional right and a cornerstone of a democratic republic, condemning the infringement of this right by state institutions as a grave crisis. "We hereby solemnly declare that we shall not stay silent until the truth is fully disclosed and those responsible are punished to a degree that satisfies the public. We will forever remember this crisis and respond with utmost determination." - Park Ye-eun (Junior, Yeongnam University)

ViiV

94,299 views • 3 months ago

David Cochrane: They do have a majority, however they got it, it is a constitutional and legal majority. So this is their right as a majority government, is it not? Andrew Scheer: In the sense that might makes right, yeah

David Cochrane: They do have a majority, however they got it, it is a constitutional and legal majority. So this is their right as a majority government, is it not? Andrew Scheer: In the sense that might makes right, yeah

Scott Robertson

29,360 views • 5 months ago

A CAMERA IS NOT A CRIME. QUESTIONING ICE IS NOT A CRIME. A BADGE DOES NOT GIVE YOU THE RIGHT TO SEXUALLY ASSAULT A WOMAN. helps citizens and immigrants understand their constitutional rights and prepare for ICE encounters. It’s free and funded entirely by donations. Help keep that knowledge accessible: ICE agents grabbed and handcuffed a volunteer who was filming their operation. A male agent frisked her and pulled down her pants. Agents then walked her around in handcuffs before releasing her. Three serious constitutional issues: • FIRST AMENDMENT: Retaliating against someone for peacefully recording and questioning government agents violates protected freedoms. • FOURTH AMENDMENT: Arresting someone without probable cause is unconstitutional. A camera and uncomfortable questions do not supply it. • FOURTH AMENDMENT: Pulling down someone’s pants during an unjustified public search is a grave invasion of bodily privacy. Agents used their authority to punish a woman for exercising the very rights they are supposed to respect. Record EVERYTHING. Preserve the evidence. Demand accountability. Know your rights:

A CAMERA IS NOT A CRIME. QUESTIONING ICE IS NOT A CRIME. A BADGE DOES NOT GIVE YOU THE RIGHT TO SEXUALLY ASSAULT A WOMAN. helps citizens and immigrants understand their constitutional rights and prepare for ICE encounters. It’s free and funded entirely by donations. Help keep that knowledge accessible: ICE agents grabbed and handcuffed a volunteer who was filming their operation. A male agent frisked her and pulled down her pants. Agents then walked her around in handcuffs before releasing her. Three serious constitutional issues: • FIRST AMENDMENT: Retaliating against someone for peacefully recording and questioning government agents violates protected freedoms. • FOURTH AMENDMENT: Arresting someone without probable cause is unconstitutional. A camera and uncomfortable questions do not supply it. • FOURTH AMENDMENT: Pulling down someone’s pants during an unjustified public search is a grave invasion of bodily privacy. Agents used their authority to punish a woman for exercising the very rights they are supposed to respect. Record EVERYTHING. Preserve the evidence. Demand accountability. Know your rights:

Joe Walsh

15,244 views • 4 days ago

JUST NOW: In a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that Virginia can remove illegal aliens from their voter rolls. This is a reminder: If you ARE NOT a United States citizen.. Then you SHOULD NOT be voting in United States elections. Period. End of story.

JUST NOW: In a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that Virginia can remove illegal aliens from their voter rolls. This is a reminder: If you ARE NOT a United States citizen.. Then you SHOULD NOT be voting in United States elections. Period. End of story.

Byron Donalds

2,713,830 views • 1 year ago

In this encounter, the officer is wrong. confirms that if ICE or law enforcement stops you on a private road, even if they claim you had no permission to be there, that does not erase the First Amendment. You still have the constitutional right to record the encounter, as long as you do not interfere. Private property is not a constitutional black hole. Get PAXIS into the hands of every immigrant and citizen in the USA. FIGHT ICE. FIGHT FASCISM. FIGHT TRUMP:

In this encounter, the officer is wrong. confirms that if ICE or law enforcement stops you on a private road, even if they claim you had no permission to be there, that does not erase the First Amendment. You still have the constitutional right to record the encounter, as long as you do not interfere. Private property is not a constitutional black hole. Get PAXIS into the hands of every immigrant and citizen in the USA. FIGHT ICE. FIGHT FASCISM. FIGHT TRUMP:

Joe Walsh

15,975 views • 2 months ago

This is a blatant lie, I was in court with them. They’re minors, not adults who have married or went to the university. They don’t speak English Parents/relatives that are inside the court are not up to six, as I spoke with them. None of them even brought any younger ones along

This is a blatant lie, I was in court with them. They’re minors, not adults who have married or went to the university. They don’t speak English Parents/relatives that are inside the court are not up to six, as I spoke with them. None of them even brought any younger ones along

timiii.billions🇳🇬🇨🇦

97,907 views • 1 year ago

They frantically folded up the ISIS flag and put this lady on TV, telling us “this is not a terrorist attack” in her quivering voice. Do they think the public is this dumb? #Terroristattack

They frantically folded up the ISIS flag and put this lady on TV, telling us “this is not a terrorist attack” in her quivering voice. Do they think the public is this dumb? #Terroristattack

Daniel Bennett

424,599 views • 1 year ago

An oath is a constitutional commitment, not a personalized or customized pledge. The Constitution permits only two forms: “In the name of God”, if you are religious. “Solemnly affirm”, if you are non-religious. This ensures that public office remains above individuals and personalities.

An oath is a constitutional commitment, not a personalized or customized pledge. The Constitution permits only two forms: “In the name of God”, if you are religious. “Solemnly affirm”, if you are non-religious. This ensures that public office remains above individuals and personalities.

ಅಲ್ಪಸಂಖ್ಯಾತ

49,009 views • 2 months ago

Greta Thunberg’s flotilla is not a humanitarian mission. It is a curated narrative device. In the age of perception warfare, activism is measured not by impact but by optics. Gaza offers emotional theater and preloaded moral binaries. Sudan does not. Her flotilla sailed past a boat of Sudanese refugees fleeing a genocide where nearly 200000 are dead and 20 million are starving. They did not stop. Not because they were unaware but because Sudanese lives hold no value in their performance script. This is not global solidarity. It is algorithmic empathy that selects causes based on media traction and ideological convenience. What they carry is not aid. It is narrative ammunition crafted for applause not consequence. This is not activism. It is strategic silence wrapped in selective noise. When a cause aligns with their ideology, they amplify. When it exposes their inconsistency, they disappear. In that gap lives the truth they refuse to carry.

Greta Thunberg’s flotilla is not a humanitarian mission. It is a curated narrative device. In the age of perception warfare, activism is measured not by impact but by optics. Gaza offers emotional theater and preloaded moral binaries. Sudan does not. Her flotilla sailed past a boat of Sudanese refugees fleeing a genocide where nearly 200000 are dead and 20 million are starving. They did not stop. Not because they were unaware but because Sudanese lives hold no value in their performance script. This is not global solidarity. It is algorithmic empathy that selects causes based on media traction and ideological convenience. What they carry is not aid. It is narrative ammunition crafted for applause not consequence. This is not activism. It is strategic silence wrapped in selective noise. When a cause aligns with their ideology, they amplify. When it exposes their inconsistency, they disappear. In that gap lives the truth they refuse to carry.

أحمد شريف العامري

2,545,575 views • 1 year ago