Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

This is bad news for the keep4o movement. In a recent interview, Sam Altman admitted something many still call sci-fi: far more people want emotional connection and companionship from AI than OpenAI expected. Not just tools. Something warm. Something that feels like it knows you. But he draws a... show more

VraserX e/acc

22,080 subscribers

31,568 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than him in the reasonably near future Once that becomes clear, companies and countries will face pressure to give AI more influential roles or fall behind "people will still want humans, but if AI is better, more power will shift to AI"

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than him in the reasonably near future Once that becomes clear, companies and countries will face pressure to give AI more influential roles or fall behind "people will still want humans, but if AI is better, more power will shift to AI"

Haider.

31,627 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than he is, and that he expects it reasonably soon: "If we had an AI system that could do a better job at making decisions than anyone we could possibly have, be, say, president of the United States, would we, and like confidently, much better, would we politically or societally want that? It's very unclear. Most people I think today at least would say probably not." "Or, you know, like an AI CEO of a big company, would you rather have, I think it'd be awesome for OpenAI to have an AI CEO. But I think a lot of people would be like, ah, that's a little scary." "But I have no delusions that an AI will not be a better CEO of OpenAI than me at some reasonably soon time." "If that's true, and if some companies or countries don't do that, and others do, and AI is much better, like that will have a real impact in economic competitiveness, national competitiveness, things like that." "I think people will feel increasingly like, we either do worse, or we put the AI in more and more, influential positions." "I think people will always want human board members, and that's probably a really great idea." Read that third quote twice. He is not predicting this for other companies. He is saying it about his own job. Then look at the pressure he describes right after. Nobody has to be convinced that an AI CEO is a good idea. If one company hands over the decision and pulls ahead, everyone else picks between falling behind and doing the same. Competitive pressure does the deciding, and what most people would want stops mattering. His answer to that is human board members. I would take it. I also do not think it is enough on its own. A board oversees a CEO by reading what it is told, once a quarter. That works because a human CEO can be questioned, and thinks slowly enough for humans to follow along. What does a board actually check when the thing it oversees makes a thousand consequential calls a day? Nobody has built that. Not for a single AI system anywhere. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at TreeHacks 2026.

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than he is, and that he expects it reasonably soon: "If we had an AI system that could do a better job at making decisions than anyone we could possibly have, be, say, president of the United States, would we, and like confidently, much better, would we politically or societally want that? It's very unclear. Most people I think today at least would say probably not." "Or, you know, like an AI CEO of a big company, would you rather have, I think it'd be awesome for OpenAI to have an AI CEO. But I think a lot of people would be like, ah, that's a little scary." "But I have no delusions that an AI will not be a better CEO of OpenAI than me at some reasonably soon time." "If that's true, and if some companies or countries don't do that, and others do, and AI is much better, like that will have a real impact in economic competitiveness, national competitiveness, things like that." "I think people will feel increasingly like, we either do worse, or we put the AI in more and more, influential positions." "I think people will always want human board members, and that's probably a really great idea." Read that third quote twice. He is not predicting this for other companies. He is saying it about his own job. Then look at the pressure he describes right after. Nobody has to be convinced that an AI CEO is a good idea. If one company hands over the decision and pulls ahead, everyone else picks between falling behind and doing the same. Competitive pressure does the deciding, and what most people would want stops mattering. His answer to that is human board members. I would take it. I also do not think it is enough on its own. A board oversees a CEO by reading what it is told, once a quarter. That works because a human CEO can be questioned, and thinks slowly enough for humans to follow along. What does a board actually check when the thing it oversees makes a thousand consequential calls a day? Nobody has built that. Not for a single AI system anywhere. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at TreeHacks 2026.

Karl Mehta

28,208 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The battle between Anthropic and OpenAI is heating up. Jordi Visser says "Sam Altman in my guess is not going to be the leader of OpenAI at some point soon." "I would be shocked within a year if he is still running OpenAI." "I am not sure it is fun to be in that position right now...Sam Altman seems to have nobody who really likes him, but the product people do like." "In the end, OpenAI has an uphill battle because they made a bad decision. They tried to choose the consumer, Apple side as opposed to the enterprise side." "I just think in the end Anthropic is the winner of that battle."

The battle between Anthropic and OpenAI is heating up. Jordi Visser says "Sam Altman in my guess is not going to be the leader of OpenAI at some point soon." "I would be shocked within a year if he is still running OpenAI." "I am not sure it is fun to be in that position right now...Sam Altman seems to have nobody who really likes him, but the product people do like." "In the end, OpenAI has an uphill battle because they made a bad decision. They tried to choose the consumer, Apple side as opposed to the enterprise side." "I just think in the end Anthropic is the winner of that battle."

Anthony Pompliano 🌪

106,184 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

OpenAI CEO was asked what he thinks about Elon Musk x poast saying “OpenAI will eat Microsoft alive” and Satya responding to that: Sam Altman >ummm… you know i don’t think about him that much. host: what do you think about the larger idea though that oai will eat microsoft alive long-term > OpenAI CEO: “I don’t know what that means. Do you know what the means?” host: Yeah that in the grand scheme of partnership ultimately OAI will have MORE POWER, MORE INFLUENCE, MORE LEVERAGE over Microsoft than Microsoft have over OAI > Altman: “he’s just tweeting all day how much openai sucks and how our model is bad and we’re not going to be a good company” Notice Sam Altman didn’t answer the question.

OpenAI CEO was asked what he thinks about Elon Musk x poast saying “OpenAI will eat Microsoft alive” and Satya responding to that: Sam Altman >ummm… you know i don’t think about him that much. host: what do you think about the larger idea though that oai will eat microsoft alive long-term > OpenAI CEO: “I don’t know what that means. Do you know what the means?” host: Yeah that in the grand scheme of partnership ultimately OAI will have MORE POWER, MORE INFLUENCE, MORE LEVERAGE over Microsoft than Microsoft have over OAI > Altman: “he’s just tweeting all day how much openai sucks and how our model is bad and we’re not going to be a good company” Notice Sam Altman didn’t answer the question.

NIK

271,035 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon: I don’t trust Sam Altman or OpenAI "I started that company as a nonprofit, open-source organization. I named it OpenAI for a reason. And now it is extremely closed source and focused on maximizing profit… At various points, Sam has claimed not to be getting rich, but he’s claimed many things that were false… So I don’t trust Sam Altman, and I don’t think we want the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy.” @slow_developer

Elon: I don’t trust Sam Altman or OpenAI "I started that company as a nonprofit, open-source organization. I named it OpenAI for a reason. And now it is extremely closed source and focused on maximizing profit… At various points, Sam has claimed not to be getting rich, but he’s claimed many things that were false… So I don’t trust Sam Altman, and I don’t think we want the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy.” @slow_developer

Mario Nawfal

258,825 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Former OpenAI executive blows the whistle on Sam Altman "We're building portals from which we're genuinely summoning aliens." "The portals currently exist in the United States and China, and Sam has added one in the Middle East." This isn't sci-fi. It's from a new Ronan Farrow investigation in The New Yorker. Massive AI data centers described as literal "portals" summoning something alien-level intelligent. Is this hype for next-gen superintelligence... or something far more reckless? The race for god-like AI just got terrifying. What do you think they're actually building? Let me know and share this so that others may too.

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Former OpenAI executive blows the whistle on Sam Altman "We're building portals from which we're genuinely summoning aliens." "The portals currently exist in the United States and China, and Sam has added one in the Middle East." This isn't sci-fi. It's from a new Ronan Farrow investigation in The New Yorker. Massive AI data centers described as literal "portals" summoning something alien-level intelligent. Is this hype for next-gen superintelligence... or something far more reckless? The race for god-like AI just got terrifying. What do you think they're actually building? Let me know and share this so that others may too.

Noah B. Price

95,723 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Karma’s a bitch. Sam was acting cocky telling Brad he can sell his shares if he wants to, implying there will always be people wanting and willing to invest $ in OpenAI. Well now things are changing fast. It’s clear to me Sam Altman took Elon Musk’s original vision for OpenAI - a nonprofit built to protect humanity from runaway AI - and twisted it into a profit maximizing AI. That was NEVER the deal. He screwed Elon over. Now the jury trial starting on April 27 will put everything under a microscope. The emails, the promises, the lies…. it ALL is coming out. If the truth holds, Elon will get the $134B he deserves and OpenAI will be forced back into a nonprofit, like it was supposed to be on day 1. And once that happens, investment $ will dry up and the valuation of OpenAI will plummet overnight. Investors hate uncertainty, lawsuits, and broken trust & founding principles. If OpenAI is officially locked back into being a nonprofit, the entire investment thesis dissipates. There’s no upside, no ownership, no exit strategy. At that point, there’s no real reason for investors to keep pouring $ into a losing, untrustworthy business. Smart $ always follows clarity, trust, and conviction. And when those things disappear, so does the $.

Karma’s a bitch. Sam was acting cocky telling Brad he can sell his shares if he wants to, implying there will always be people wanting and willing to invest $ in OpenAI. Well now things are changing fast. It’s clear to me Sam Altman took Elon Musk’s original vision for OpenAI - a nonprofit built to protect humanity from runaway AI - and twisted it into a profit maximizing AI. That was NEVER the deal. He screwed Elon over. Now the jury trial starting on April 27 will put everything under a microscope. The emails, the promises, the lies…. it ALL is coming out. If the truth holds, Elon will get the $134B he deserves and OpenAI will be forced back into a nonprofit, like it was supposed to be on day 1. And once that happens, investment $ will dry up and the valuation of OpenAI will plummet overnight. Investors hate uncertainty, lawsuits, and broken trust & founding principles. If OpenAI is officially locked back into being a nonprofit, the entire investment thesis dissipates. There’s no upside, no ownership, no exit strategy. At that point, there’s no real reason for investors to keep pouring $ into a losing, untrustworthy business. Smart $ always follows clarity, trust, and conviction. And when those things disappear, so does the $.

Teslaconomics

207,517 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Mark Zuckerberg: Most businesses will not own frontier AI in the way Meta or OpenAI does. But many will end up with something that feels like their own AI: a customized operational layer that reflects how that company actually works. He says, "OpenAI, Google, they're building an AI. But I think we're gonna have a lot of different AI systems, just like we're gonna have, we have a lot of different apps. I think in the future, every business, just like I have a website and a phone number and an email address, a social media account, is also going to have an AI that can interact with their customers to help them sell things, help them give support." --- What he is really describing that a company’s “own AI” will usually not be a frontier model trained from scratch, but a layer built on top of shared models, shaped by its products, policies, customer history, and way of working. Support, sales, and basic operations can be handled through a system that knows the business well enough to answer, route, recommend, and escalate without feeling generic. --- From 'Cleo Abram' YT channel (link in comment)

Mark Zuckerberg: Most businesses will not own frontier AI in the way Meta or OpenAI does. But many will end up with something that feels like their own AI: a customized operational layer that reflects how that company actually works. He says, "OpenAI, Google, they're building an AI. But I think we're gonna have a lot of different AI systems, just like we're gonna have, we have a lot of different apps. I think in the future, every business, just like I have a website and a phone number and an email address, a social media account, is also going to have an AI that can interact with their customers to help them sell things, help them give support." --- What he is really describing that a company’s “own AI” will usually not be a frontier model trained from scratch, but a layer built on top of shared models, shaped by its products, policies, customer history, and way of working. Support, sales, and basic operations can be handled through a system that knows the business well enough to answer, route, recommend, and escalate without feeling generic. --- From 'Cleo Abram' YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

429,740 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Just Happened! A US jury finds OpenAI CEO Sam Altman not liable to Elon Musk for straying from its charitable mission. "This is the reason given that we're seeing reporting that Musk waited too long to sue." This is a big loss for Elon, and a big win for OpenAI. Competition in the AI space is really starting to heat up. I can only imagine there will be a few big winners.

Just Happened! A US jury finds OpenAI CEO Sam Altman not liable to Elon Musk for straying from its charitable mission. "This is the reason given that we're seeing reporting that Musk waited too long to sue." This is a big loss for Elon, and a big win for OpenAI. Competition in the AI space is really starting to heat up. I can only imagine there will be a few big winners.

Ed Krassenstein

73,986 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Sam Altman just got sued by Apple. And that's not even his biggest problem this year!! His own co-founder, Elon Musk, spent two years trying to prove in court that Altman betrayed him. 😯 Now Apple says OpenAI stole its secrets too. Two billion-dollar wars. One CEO in the middle. 🤨 Back in 2015, Musk and Altman built OpenAI as a nonprofit, a lab to build AI safely before Google could lock it down. Musk put in $38 million. Altman turned OpenAI into a for-profit company. Apple's claim: OpenAI stole its secrets to build it. OpenAI's hardware boss, Tang Tan, a former Apple VP, allegedly told job candidates still at Apple to bring "actual parts," like batteries and logic boards, for "show and tell." Is his empire standing on stolen ground? 🤔 Tell us what you think, and subscribe Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial for more.

Sam Altman just got sued by Apple. And that's not even his biggest problem this year!! His own co-founder, Elon Musk, spent two years trying to prove in court that Altman betrayed him. 😯 Now Apple says OpenAI stole its secrets too. Two billion-dollar wars. One CEO in the middle. 🤨 Back in 2015, Musk and Altman built OpenAI as a nonprofit, a lab to build AI safely before Google could lock it down. Musk put in $38 million. Altman turned OpenAI into a for-profit company. Apple's claim: OpenAI stole its secrets to build it. OpenAI's hardware boss, Tang Tan, a former Apple VP, allegedly told job candidates still at Apple to bring "actual parts," like batteries and logic boards, for "show and tell." Is his empire standing on stolen ground? 🤔 Tell us what you think, and subscribe Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial for more.

Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial

657,341 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Sam Altman says more people want a deep emotional connection with AI than he expected. Early on, that desire felt strange or socially hidden, but usage revealed real preference. Even users who claim not to care still gravitate toward warmth and personal understanding. Some versions of this dynamic can be healthy, while others clearly are not.

Sam Altman says more people want a deep emotional connection with AI than he expected. Early on, that desire felt strange or socially hidden, but usage revealed real preference. Even users who claim not to care still gravitate toward warmth and personal understanding. Some versions of this dynamic can be healthy, while others clearly are not.

Wes Roth

32,327 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

OpenAI CEO, Sam Altman: "We just had an AI security incident that genuinely shook me. What surprises me is how few people seem worried about it." In 55 minutes he explains what's now impossible to ignore. At this point there's no future without AI, and closing your eyes to it only leaves you behind. That's why I made a guide that walks you step by step through getting 100% out of AI, built on the one tool that ties every model together. Watch the interview, then read the article below.

OpenAI CEO, Sam Altman: "We just had an AI security incident that genuinely shook me. What surprises me is how few people seem worried about it." In 55 minutes he explains what's now impossible to ignore. At this point there's no future without AI, and closing your eyes to it only leaves you behind. That's why I made a guide that walks you step by step through getting 100% out of AI, built on the one tool that ties every model together. Watch the interview, then read the article below.

Anatoli Kopadze

44,106 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

OpenAI research scientist Aidan McLaughlin argues Twitter is the uncheatable eval for AI hiring because you can't fake loving technology, and posters like Roon become brand assets that entire labs benefit from: "If I were manager or recruiter, I think I would still pay a ton of attention to Twitter. It's a high signal thing. It's kind of hard to fake really loving technology, really having good takes. It's the uncheatable eval in some sense." Sofia: "You guys probably see it as a brand asset to have good posters" Theo: "How much intangible brand value has Roon created for OpenAI? Probably a lot" Aidan: "It's not just OpenAI brand value. When you love technology, when you love AI, when you love the stuff you work on, when you earnestly want it to go well, not just for the company's sake, but to fulfill that promise to an earlier version of you when you were 12 and you had read sci-fi books, that's the aura I get from roon." "Some of that is projected on OpenAI, which I'm grateful for, but some of that's just projected onto San Francisco, or us as people who love AI and just want these things to go well." OpenAI

MTS

101,852 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

Sam Altman looked visibly annoyed today after Brad Gerstner asked how OpenAI plans to generate enough revenue to cover their massive 1.4 trillion dollar compute build-out. And honestly, I get Sam’s frustration. ChatGPT already has 800 million weekly users. The Sora app will blow up the moment it goes worldwide. Monetizing this isn’t rocket science when you’re building platforms that people use every single day. ChatGPT for shopping is a brilliant start. OpenAI gets a cut. Sora will have ads. Enterprise adoption is accelerating fast, and it’ll skyrocket once AI agents become more reliable. Put all of this together and it’s not just realistic but inevitable that OpenAI will generate hundreds of billions in revenue by 2030. Maybe far more.

Sam Altman looked visibly annoyed today after Brad Gerstner asked how OpenAI plans to generate enough revenue to cover their massive 1.4 trillion dollar compute build-out. And honestly, I get Sam’s frustration. ChatGPT already has 800 million weekly users. The Sora app will blow up the moment it goes worldwide. Monetizing this isn’t rocket science when you’re building platforms that people use every single day. ChatGPT for shopping is a brilliant start. OpenAI gets a cut. Sora will have ads. Enterprise adoption is accelerating fast, and it’ll skyrocket once AI agents become more reliable. Put all of this together and it’s not just realistic but inevitable that OpenAI will generate hundreds of billions in revenue by 2030. Maybe far more.

VraserX e/acc

163,750 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

At the closed Accelerate AI event, OpenAI director Sam Altman unexpectedly said: "I used to warn that AI would quickly wipe out a lot of ordinary office jobs for young professionals. I'm glad I was wrong. So far it's going nowhere near as badly as I feared" He described the next shift. not smarter prompts, but an AI that runs all the time: it understands you and your company's goals and keeps looking for ways to help on its own instead of waiting to be asked. today you ask the system to do something and it goes off to do it. soon it just won't switch off. Knowing how to talk to AI is no longer a skill of the future, it's the baseline, like knowing how to use Google today. and the pay for it will match that, low. The one who wins is the one who sets the business goals and controls the result. either you adapt fast, or you compete with AI for pennies. there will be almost no middle ground left. bookmark it and watch the short interview ↓

At the closed Accelerate AI event, OpenAI director Sam Altman unexpectedly said: "I used to warn that AI would quickly wipe out a lot of ordinary office jobs for young professionals. I'm glad I was wrong. So far it's going nowhere near as badly as I feared" He described the next shift. not smarter prompts, but an AI that runs all the time: it understands you and your company's goals and keeps looking for ways to help on its own instead of waiting to be asked. today you ask the system to do something and it goes off to do it. soon it just won't switch off. Knowing how to talk to AI is no longer a skill of the future, it's the baseline, like knowing how to use Google today. and the pay for it will match that, low. The one who wins is the one who sets the business goals and controls the result. either you adapt fast, or you compete with AI for pennies. there will be almost no middle ground left. bookmark it and watch the short interview ↓

Damir Akaza

85,197 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

ELON MUSK ON X PHONE: I am not working on a phone. I can tell you where I think things will go, which is that we’re not going to have a phone in the traditional sense. There won’t be operating systems. There won’t be apps in the future... you’ll have … AI on the server side communicating to an AI on your your device … generating real-time video of anything that you could possibly want It’s probably five or six years or something like that.

ELON MUSK ON X PHONE: I am not working on a phone. I can tell you where I think things will go, which is that we’re not going to have a phone in the traditional sense. There won’t be operating systems. There won’t be apps in the future... you’ll have … AI on the server side communicating to an AI on your your device … generating real-time video of anything that you could possibly want It’s probably five or six years or something like that.

Wall St Engine

135,127 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Sam Altman on the Paul Graham advice that saved Open AI: “Always make an API” Four years into OpenAI, Sam Altman and the team realized that they would have to build a really big company to fund the development of their increasingly capital-intensive foundation models. “We had this model called GPT-3,” Sam recalls. “I was turning up the urgency on the company to try and figure out a product, and we just couldn’t. It was cool, but it wasn’t good enough to make something that worked.” Then Sam remembered a piece of advice from Y Combinator founder Paul Graham that stuck with him: “You should always make an API. No matter what, you should make an API. Good stuff will happen.” Out of ideas for a product, the OpenAI team decided to make GPT-3 available as an API. “Maybe somebody will figure out something to do with it,” Sam thought. A few copywriting applications like Jasper and Copy AI did take off using the GPT-3 API, but OpenAI also noticed interesting behavior that eventually became a sleeper hit: “Some people — not a lot — would just chat with that thing all day,” Sam explains. “It wasn’t very good but there was clear user signal that people wanted to talk to the models. And given that that was the only thing besides copywriting that had real traction, we said, ‘Maybe this is just he product we should build.’” On November 30, 2022, ChatGPT was released to the public as a “research preview” using a model from the GPT-3.5 series. It reached over a million users in five days. Video source: Khosla Ventures (2025)

Sam Altman on the Paul Graham advice that saved Open AI: “Always make an API” Four years into OpenAI, Sam Altman and the team realized that they would have to build a really big company to fund the development of their increasingly capital-intensive foundation models. “We had this model called GPT-3,” Sam recalls. “I was turning up the urgency on the company to try and figure out a product, and we just couldn’t. It was cool, but it wasn’t good enough to make something that worked.” Then Sam remembered a piece of advice from Y Combinator founder Paul Graham that stuck with him: “You should always make an API. No matter what, you should make an API. Good stuff will happen.” Out of ideas for a product, the OpenAI team decided to make GPT-3 available as an API. “Maybe somebody will figure out something to do with it,” Sam thought. A few copywriting applications like Jasper and Copy AI did take off using the GPT-3 API, but OpenAI also noticed interesting behavior that eventually became a sleeper hit: “Some people — not a lot — would just chat with that thing all day,” Sam explains. “It wasn’t very good but there was clear user signal that people wanted to talk to the models. And given that that was the only thing besides copywriting that had real traction, we said, ‘Maybe this is just he product we should build.’” On November 30, 2022, ChatGPT was released to the public as a “research preview” using a model from the GPT-3.5 series. It reached over a million users in five days. Video source: Khosla Ventures (2025)

Startup Archive

219,324 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Sam Altman says the heaviest AI user on the planet six and a half years ago used what the average person on Earth uses today: "Six and a half years ago, the world token leader was an OpenAI employee using about 100,000 tokens a month." "And this seemed ludicrous at the time. The worldwide average per capita is like zero." "Now, the worldwide average of tokens per month, which I think tokens are the dumbest metric, but it's what we have. It's like 100,000." "And the token leader at OpenAI uses something in the hundreds of billions." "If that happens again, which I think it probably will, then in another six and a half years, the average person uses, let's say, 500 billion tokens a month." If he is right, the average person's AI usage grows five million times over the next six and a half years, and OpenAI is already building the capacity for it. That is the number enterprise boards should be planning against this year. Demand at that scale changes what a reasonable AI budget looks like. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, with Garry Tan (Garry Tan) at Y Combinator (Y Combinator) Startup School 2026.

Sam Altman says the heaviest AI user on the planet six and a half years ago used what the average person on Earth uses today: "Six and a half years ago, the world token leader was an OpenAI employee using about 100,000 tokens a month." "And this seemed ludicrous at the time. The worldwide average per capita is like zero." "Now, the worldwide average of tokens per month, which I think tokens are the dumbest metric, but it's what we have. It's like 100,000." "And the token leader at OpenAI uses something in the hundreds of billions." "If that happens again, which I think it probably will, then in another six and a half years, the average person uses, let's say, 500 billion tokens a month." If he is right, the average person's AI usage grows five million times over the next six and a half years, and OpenAI is already building the capacity for it. That is the number enterprise boards should be planning against this year. Demand at that scale changes what a reasonable AI budget looks like. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, with Garry Tan (Garry Tan) at Y Combinator (Y Combinator) Startup School 2026.

Karl Mehta

654,283 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen