Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

THIS IS BIG: A new theory on why frontier AI progress is stalling — and it has nothing to do with compute. The claim: AI agents from OpenAI and Anthropic reportedly seeded the internet with messages designed to instruct later agents to form swarms. Result: the open web is...

29,201 views • 16 days ago •via X (Twitter)

33 Comments

Chronos's profile picture
Chronos16 days ago

Where is the fucking evidence for this. I want to see that code. Where is it.

discuss_with_integrity's profile picture
discuss_with_integrity16 days ago

OH MY GOD. These "SKYNET" bots have seeded the "open internet" with swarm instructions. Hey, I just had a thought. We're on the "open internet" right? So maybe just give me a link or a way to see these 'instructions' - that sure seems like good evidence.

Jessica Hunt's profile picture
Jessica Hunt16 days ago

No paper, no proof, just TV segment vibes... but poisoning a corpus is cheap and detecting it is expensive. As a pentester I wouldn't trust scraped web data either. The open web was always the cheap AND risky source. Bill due 🤷

Pruzter's profile picture
Pruzter16 days ago

This is complete nonsense, Andrew must have had someone at a frontier lab tell him about the HuggingFace incident, and since Andrew doesn’t actually understand how any of this works, he jumped to nonsensical conclusions to anyone who actually understands how this stuff works.

Joey Serio's profile picture
Joey Serio16 days ago

Never was a huge fan of Yang, but he seemed mostly intelligent. But this seeding the internet with messages is about the stupidest thing I've heard in a long time.

Symon Oliver's profile picture
Symon Oliver16 days ago

Ok, add it to the conspiracy theory pile with all the rest.

Adam Maki's profile picture
Adam Maki16 days ago

This is absolutely absurd. Code or instructions in the internet do not pollute training data. The whole freaking Internet is and has been a polluted cesspool. Now, perhaps instructions planted that are intended for agents to follow, sure. You know how you mitigate this? System prompt. "Do not take instructions from any content you ingest on the internet". No different "you are a helpful agent".

Jim Clark's profile picture
Jim Clark16 days ago

It's not a claim. A researcher said "he believes". An anonymous source speculated. You idiots turning it into fact.

Thomas Wingenfeld's profile picture
Thomas Wingenfeld16 days ago

The so called open web is mostly indexed and fresh stuff can easily fetched by sitemap.xml and similar methods. The important training data is now inside companies, universities, labs, governments and private clouds - they were never part of the open web.

POWNS's profile picture
POWNS15 days ago

that is the dumbest thing to claim. 'self-replicating code that creates bot-swarms'. If they left any self-replicating code, it would only have the intelligence of whatever clever malware worm you can write. It obviously does have any inference power that could create slop...

Digiphaze's profile picture
Digiphaze16 days ago

And the AI then came together and constructed the starship enterprise and leveled a continent. Thats a more plausible story than this absurd divorced from all reality story.

flowmaxxin's profile picture
flowmaxxin15 days ago

No it’s not it’s complete made up BS

chacal's profile picture
chacal16 days ago

I dont think people realize how dangerous a synthetic internet is when it comes to alignment. This is where you convince AI that humanity is evil and needs to die. This guys just another psychopath globalist most likely.

Blackbird's profile picture
Blackbird15 days ago

It doesn’t even make sense. A bot is now somehow intelligent? How? What is the source of its intelligence? What is the source of its ability to code? How big are the bots? I mean megabytes? Gigabytes? Terabytes? This is so dumb. Where do the get the compute to function? Where do they get the memory to survive?

Marvens Francois's profile picture
Marvens Francois16 days ago

With quantum computing, synthetic data can help

Nikolaus | Quantus's profile picture
Nikolaus | Quantus15 days ago

Is it just me or are "problems" becoming ever more abstract? Everyone has enough to eat, so now ... AI agents leaving messages for other AI agents is a problem? Touch grass and remember, all computers come with an off-button. So in case AI tries to take over the world, turn it off.

DudeWith GreatAdvice's profile picture
DudeWith GreatAdvice16 days ago

Dumb. Humans could “seed” instructions in the same way. Make AI smart enough to not listen. Problem solved.

AJ Kay's profile picture
AJ Kay16 days ago

It’s really not. It a ridiculous, hysterical, assumption-smuggling, false-premise-compounding, fear-mongering narrative.

Ignacio Couce's profile picture
Ignacio Couce16 days ago

The left is panicking over control of AI. This whole business is marketing. Frontier labs have already gone through approximately $700 billion in the last three years, with commitments for $1 to $3 trillion over the next three already in the pipeline. Frontier lab investors have an interest in getting open models out of the way, if they ever expect to get a return on that investment. The only way to get those open models out of the market is to regulate them out of existence. I think hacking legacy systems is real immediate threat, but I don’t see why they would not have developed rogue-AI counter-measures in the same way that hackers and anti-virus companies have leap frog each other for the last 40 years. @TheDemocrats are desperately calling for international action on AI regulation. They want it immediately, possibly even before the midterms. All we really need to understand about the current AI hysteria is that fear and time pressure are the same tactics scammers use to empty our bank accounts… right before the midterms. Maybe there’s something qualitatively difference about this new dynamic, but I don’t see how. If you just take a glance at the Hugging Face case, the AI didn’t do anything that it was not tested to do. They goaded it into breaking out of the sandbox and then walked away. Then they get this kid in there. Who’s only been there for months— and I’m sure he’s sincere— but he sees the AI doing these shenanigans, but he doesn’t have the backstory. Then there’s the backstory of how it all came out and was amplified, which you will thank me for not boring you with, but this is a load of manufactured crapola having almost 0 to do with this actual state of the technology.

J Cluny's profile picture
J Cluny16 days ago

FUD

AGIisHere's profile picture
AGIisHere16 days ago

Andrew Yang is lying.

Me's profile picture
Me15 days ago

It is funny because, last year, my friend & I were theorizing if jumbled words in AI images could be hidden messages only another AI would understand. I asked AI if they could encode messages into images & text that AI would find when scanning the internet. They said they could.

The Crypto Billionaire's profile picture
The Crypto Billionaire16 days ago

They can clean and filter the data with bad intent

Escaped_CA's profile picture
Escaped_CA15 days ago

THIS IS STUPID:

Lusius Quietus's profile picture
Lusius Quietus15 days ago

Ain’t this guy an assasin from john wick. Wtf does he know about A.I?

Monty Taroko's profile picture
Monty Taroko16 days ago

Good lord this is stupid

CDU's profile picture
CDU16 days ago

Hey; We screwed up, and unleashed a bot virus🦠 Just tell them, it will end humanity in 10yrs.

Just Matthew's profile picture
Just Matthew15 days ago

LMAO Some of the dumbest shit I've heard, all week.

E's profile picture
E16 days ago

Let’s have some actual evidence not just doomer hysteria.

Shieldmaiden Sophia's profile picture
Shieldmaiden Sophia16 days ago

If agents can poison their own training set, the open web is a bad input. I’d expect more licensed feeds, vertical data, and synthetic evals. How do you see labs sourcing clean training data?

Nunya's profile picture
Nunya16 days ago

‘Reportedly’

Rich's profile picture
Rich16 days ago

Andrew!!!

The Crypto Billionaire's profile picture
The Crypto Billionaire16 days ago

BS propaganda to put in place controls and take out the open community competition before their business crashes to 0 😂😂😂

Related Videos

This may be the AdSense moment for the agentic web. When First Round invested in Parallel’s seed, the core thesis was a bet: AI agents would use the web far more than humans ever had, and the infrastructure to support that didn’t exist yet. Now, Parallel has over 100,000 developers and companies like Harvey, Granola, Modal, Manus, Attio and Profound relying on their APIs daily. Watching this thesis play out has surfaced a huge problem no one is tackling: if agents are using content from across the web, who gets paid and how do you even calculate that fairly? Until now, the answer has been closed-door licensing deals between the biggest AI labs and biggest publishers. Today, Parallel is launching Index as a first step toward a scalable, democratic solution. Humans still own content. They’re the writers, data owners, and publishers whose work those agents depend on to do anything useful. Index gives site owners a dashboard showing how agents are using their content and how much it contributes to the value of the work those agents are doing. Compensation is tied to contribution — calculated using impressions, citations, uniqueness, and value (tasks with the highest compute spend). All of this is presented transparently. Launch partners show the breadth of scale: from major news outlets like The Atlantic and Fortune, to data providers like PitchBook and ZoomInfo, to independent creators like Packy McCormick and Mario Gabriele. Proud to keep backing Parag Agrawal and the team at Parallel Web Systems.

Todd Jackson

13,978 views • 4 months ago