Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
This is epic 🤩🥹🥵 Periyoney en Rahmaaney🤲 Sung by Deva, Ilayaraja, AR Rahman, Yuvan, MSV, SPB, Anirudh using AI🤌
10 Yorum
Navneeth Ravichandran2 yıl önce
Instant emotional wave hits when we hear SPB sir voice....he is something else.... absolute angel of God!!! Miss him!! 🥺
Ranjith2 yıl önce
Request to remove the last voice from AI database
🤢Dr.Squalor Dustking, Ph.D.,😈2 yıl önce
Deva always top...👌🏻
திவினோ I.N.D.I.A🖤❤️2 yıl önce
SPB Sir...🥹🥹🥹
appuloganathan2 yıl önce
Spb
Syed2 yıl önce
SPB voice 😍😍😍
¢яαzу ℓσνє❦ツ2 yıl önce
I wonder about the voice of MSV hits different😇
Cine Freak2 yıl önce
Yaen ya azhavekreenga 🥺🥺🥺
Elangovan2 yıl önce
Spb voice 🔥🔥🔥🔥
Tweeter2 yıl önce
exact spb voice
![🚨Medical coder/whistleblower: Here's how Palantir's "KILL CHAIN" programs were used to target and "EXECUTE" American citizens with COVID jabs/remdesivir/ventilators. "They identified different hospitals or different individual patients based on [their 'threat risk score'] and [that's how they] determined [who]...to execute...with their AI kill-chain Gotham program." This clip of author, former medical coder, and whistleblower Zowe Smith (Sheldon Diedericks) is taken from an interview with James Corbett posted to Rumble on June 17, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So there was a program called HHS Protect during Operation Warp Speed, was part of Operation Warp Speed. That's where I think most of the public-facing infrastructure began. Although I was looking into Operation Stargate, and I'm seeing documentation on CIA databases that say it's more than 10 years in the making. So, definitely it's, it's a planned thing. It didn't just come out with day two, Trump administration. "But, so this HHS Protect program is really interesting because what it did, it used two different Palantir programs. So the AMA, HHS, the CDC specifically, all partnered with Palantir. And then Palantir developed a program for Operation Warp Speed. And that program, what it did was it assigned people a Threat Risk Score. And then that was a program called Tiberius, which they also use for other purposes. "So I want to make this point about AI, because when I was a medical coder, I was using a program which is a partner of Palantir, both 3M and Epic, and those are two different programs that I use that both have AI built into them that are partners of Palantir. And so all of these AI databases talk to each other as a condition of working with each other. So this has been going on for a very long time. But within Epic there are programs and you can rename them whatever you want, but it's the same program at any hospital across the country. So, like your program, Epic, might not be named Epic at Johns Hopkins or Mayo, it might have a different name at Johns Hopkins or Mayo, but it's still the same program. "So this program from Palantir called Tiberius, they can rename that whatever they want, but the program will still do what it was programmed to do. It's, it's just a function really. And HHS had two programs built in. Tiberius was the thing that assigned you a Threat Risk score. And that was if you were following lockdown criteria, if you were actually distancing from people, if you had been vaccinated, if you were masking, you know, how obedient were you, that was your threat risk score. They also could determine down to the zip code where you were and how compliant areas were. "And so, as Whitney Webb covers from the Unlimited Hangout, she wrote a article covering this program, HHS Protect, and highlights how this was used to target ethnic groups. So this threat risk score also incorporated your ethnicity and they thought, you know, you're higher risk if you're certain ethnic groups. So of course that was part of the risk score. And then Gotham is the AI kill chain program created by Palantir and that was used within HHS Protect to execute. "So the Gotham program, it takes the threat risk score from Tiberius and then it executes the threat or tells, does an AI decision making process and decides when and how and where to deploy the countermeasures. Which was your vaccine, your remdesivir and your ventilator. That is why HHS Protect was created so that they could monitor all of this. And that is how they identified different hospitals or different individual patients based on some algorithm and determined that's how we're going to execute people with their AI kill chain Gotham program."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1935812481127260318/amplify_video_thumb/1935810337950867456/img/2xiaDpXG_Lvfqnr4.jpg)
![I HAVE AN ANSWER TO THE AI HACKING COMPUTER THREAT! HyperY2K I had this song made by my AI in real-time while I was writing. It is all local AI using a highly modified ACE AI engine. The real-time lyrics and music kept me focused. I thinks its mid… It should be our new Safety Dance! These are the lyrics. HyperY2k [Intro] (Low, urgent spoken word over ticking clock / modem static sounds) "Frontier models... not in years, but in months... Whole-of-society response... existential." [Verse 1] Shadows in the wire, ghosts in the machine Legacy code rotting, vulnerabilities unseen Criminals and empires, chaining exploits old EternalBlue still singing its deadly song Five Eyes sounding the alarm, midnight drawing near AI's dual blade is cutting crystal clear Offense gets the speed, but defenders rise the same We don't chain the future, we ignite the flame [Pre-Chorus] Technical debt's a mountain, decades in the making Patched holes still bleeding, foundations shaking No time for retreat, no room for fear The clock is striking hyper — the hour is here! [Chorus] Hyper Y2K! Mobilize the fire! AI on the frontline, lift the wire! Patch at machine speed, close the gates tonight Accelerate the fix, hold the future bright! No surrender, no chains on innovation's might America's edge — we code through the fight! Hyper Y2K! Rise up, remediate! Turn the threat to triumph — it's never too late! [Verse 2] Y2K was the warning, billions on the line Councils, partnerships, testing 'round the clock time Expanded the fields, bridged the ancient code Public-private warriors on the global road Now the stakes are higher, AI supercharges the war Millions of lines audited, patches at the core Fuzzing, verifying, anomaly response Legacy systems falling — we break the old course [Pre-Chorus] From WinRAR to WannaCry, the old ghosts return But AI sees the patterns that the humans never learn No prohibition folly, that hands the win away We weaponize the future — live to fight another day! [Chorus] Hyper Y2K! Mobilize the fire! AI on the frontline, lift the wire! Patch at machine speed, close the gates tonight Accelerate the fix, hold the future bright! No surrender, no chains on innovation's might America's edge — we code through the fight! Hyper Y2K! Rise up, remediate! Turn the threat to triumph — it's never too late! [Bridge] (Slower, heavier, spoken/sung with building intensity) They say slow it down, restrict the American dream Hand the keys to rivals who plot in the machine China, Russia, shadows — laughing as we fall But ingenuity's our weapon, we answer freedom's call Inventory the darkness, forge the patches new Tax credits, councils, liability shields true Out-innovate the darkness, out-fix the broken past This is Hyper Y2K — make resilience last! [Guitar Solo] (Fast, technical runs mimicking code execution → soaring melodic triumph) [Final Chorus – Bigger, Key Up] Hyper Y2K! (Hyper Y2K!) Mobilize the fire! AI on the frontline, lift the wire higher! Patch the world at speed, secure our children's night Accelerate the vision, into abundance light! No surrender! (No chains!) Innovation's might! We code the new frontier — we win this fight! Hyper Y2K! Rise up, remediate! From the ashes of debt — a hardened future awaits! [Outro] (Fading with gang vocals and electronic resolve) Patch the fire... accelerate... never too late... Hyper Y2K... we rise.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2069268986278392058/amplify_video_thumb/2069268634275573760/img/f1FBSiE4JuNcScsI.jpg)
![[Trans] 🐰: Sawadee krub 🙏🏻 🎤: Let’s talk about your new song? 🐰: I have already released a song called "YOURS" under #RISERMUSIC label. Please give it a listen.😊 🎤: You look so handsome in the music video. You were dancing in it too. 🐰: Have you seen it? Yes, I danced a little bit 🕺 🎤: How long has it been since you last released a song? 🐰: I think it’s been more than a year. I worked on it before, but every time I finished, I ended up redoing it again and again. I really wanted the final result to be exactly the way I liked it, so I kept adjusting it until it finally became this song. 🎶 🎤: What is the song about? 🐰: It’s about a hopelessly in-love guy who’s deeply in love with a woman and is willing to do anything for her.🥹💚 🎤: Was it inspired by your own experience? 🐰: No, it was from P’Kangsom 😄 I really like the vibe of the song.🎶 🎤: Is it related to your life? 🐰: Not at all. I now concentrate only on sword fighting ⚔️ 😆 🎤: How do you manage to look so handsome while singing? 🐰: I just wake up like this. I don't know if I look handsome or not. 😂 🎤: Let’s talk about the recent case. What do you think about people using your face for their own benefit using AI? 🐰: I don't think they should do that. Technology can be both good and bad. It's not right to use it in a way that can mislead others. I have already taken legal action against those who have done it. 🎤: Are you angry about it? 🐰: Not really angry, but I'm uncomfortable with it. It's not right. 🎤: Are there any victims yet? 🐰: Not that I know of. 🎤: Have the people who did it contacted you? 🐰: No. We are still in the process of identifying them. 🎤: Are you going to take legal action against them to the fullest extent of the law? 🐰: Yes, definitely. 🎤: Do you have anything to say to the people who are doing this? 🐰: Stop it. It's not right to do this to anyone eventually you will be caught and face legal consequences. 🐰: Thank you krub. 🙏🏻 WIN X AMAZING THAILAND #AmazingThailand #AmazingThailandExclusiveNight #winmetawin Winmetawin](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2016538760708780410/amplify_video_thumb/2016538605402128384/img/8peYX-QpYopqEyDo.jpg)
![The most epic 13 minute AI rant I've heard in 2026 PS: My parent's heard this when I was playing it in the car and thought Jason ✨👾SaaStr.Ai✨ Lemkin went OFF like Stephen A Smith does on first take PPS: Full transcript below [17:00] Harry Stebbings: I I just wanted to ask Jason, if the people that we want are fundamentally different, the developers that we used to hire, we don't because AI writes the code for us. The marketers we don't want, the sales people we don't want—who who do we want genuinely? Like what is the attractive profile? Because your Anthropic’s and your OpenAIs are hiring, so so what are the people that we want in the companies of the future? [17:18] Jason Lemkin: Look, I know it sounds trite, but but the answer is simple. It's just the expression each year changes. We want folks that are genuinely AI fluent. It's pretty simple. Now you know, maybe last year we called them prompt engineers, right? That used to be a job. I don't know if you remember that actually used to be the hottest job on planet earth. Now no one needs a prompt engineer because it's pretty easy to prompt all these tools. That job died. Okay. Um and now we need go-to-market engineers. Um I think that job's going to die. We need—everyone needs so many forward deployed engineers. Like you can't hire enough forward deployed engineers. But uh you know um but Palantir just announced in whatever their their big their big event—they've gotten their deployment times down over 90% with forward deployed engineers. So that may become—so the this wave of disruption for the titles and the specificity, it's also exhaustingly accelerating. But it's really simple. You meet anyone for any role—sales, marketing, engineering, product, QA—they're they're either they're either they can't keep all of the ways they use AI to accelerate their job from spewing out of their mouth, or they're staring at you. It's there's nowhere in the middle. Like, and the person that comes in and says—it's it's it sounds Captain Obvious—but like, you know, you just had the whatever from Lovable, the the marketing head that was super popular on the show, right? She's just spewing AI-native insights into Lovable, right? It's not that complicated. You hire her, Elena, or whatever it is. You just hire her. It doesn't matter whether she's still in college or a junior or a senior or a middler, a left or right. And honestly, if you interview people, I would say of all even of the best startups I've invested in, maybe 30% of the management team meets this standard at best. 30%. Maybe less. And of the interviews I do in general, it's single-digit percents. It's just and in in that sense, it's the same as ever. Like you either lower the bar in hiring or you hire someone that's actually great. And someone that's actually great is so far ahead of you in how to apply to to employ the efficiencies of AI in their role, your jaw falls on the table. The difference is we used to need warm bodies. That's what's changing. We used to need warm bodies to answer the call, to do QA, to do code review, to to get the blue pixel to go from the upper left to the lower right. You laugh, but you need you literally needed to brute force this with humans. With AI, every day that goes by, the AI—you do not need brute force human beings on your team. And that's another reason they're shrinking. Why are all these new companies so efficient? They're just not brute forcing things with humans. They're just not. They're choosing not to. And so these team—all the brute forcers out there—everyone talks about how bloated teams got in 2021. I don't agree with that. I think they got as big as they needed to be when growth was high and you needed humans to do everything. All you look at these teams that that doubled—well if growth continued at 60% like the rate in early 2021 for 5 years or can help me do the math and every single thing a software company did required a human. You were understaffed by your 2021 headcount. You'd be sitting here in 2026. You every office in SoMa would be triple packed and you there wouldn't be enough humans to staff your company. It's just the world changed. [20:33] Harry Stebbings: Jason, you live on the bleeding edge. I think me and Rory see that and I think the world sees that when they hear you every week in terms of how you run SaaS. For all of the CEOs and execs who listen to the show, what would you advise them in terms of determining whether someone is AI fluent when they meet them for jobs, for talent? [20:51] Jason Lemkin: Here's I realized I was just asked this. I just did a review with a super fast startup growing just crossing 100 million and I was asked this question. And one of my favorite executives, I thought his answer was pretty dated and because he gave me an answer that was about 6 months old. The answer 6 months old is: "I look for folks in my team, I look for you know at what tools they play with." Okay, that was a great answer in like summer of 2025. Okay, I tried Lovable last week. Okay, the answer in 2026 is: "What commercial AI tool have you brought into your organization this month?" That's the test. Anyone that is on the bleeding edge that you would want to hire—now there are so many great products in the market. Okay, there is no excuse in any role to have not brought one tool a month into your organization. Okay, there—now there's going to be better and better tools and better and better products as the year goes on. What's the one you did? And you will see folks with their deer in the headlights to this question. What what sales tool? What marketing tool? What product tool? What engineering tool? What did you bring in? Why did you pick it? How does it working? Because if you're at remotely at the cutting edge, you're all over this. You're looking for the next agentic tools that will radically improve how you do business. This is—you think everyone thinks SaaS is at the bleeding edge, right? You know, you know, all we do is we're just looking for the tools and trying them. Okay? Okay, we're one year ahead of everybody else because we did the simplest thing in the world. Like we tried the tools early and we trained them. We trained them for a month. Okay, I'll give you—want hear a horrible example from this week? Super hot AI company valued at 6 billion. Okay, I'm not going to name it. Um, this week yesterday told us we had to quadruple what we spent on their product. Okay, their agent told us, right? And why did this happen? Okay. Well, at this $6 billion company, no one had trained the agent on its pricing properly. No one had tested it. They said, "Well, well, we've been in beta." And we said, "Well, when did the beta launch? A year ago." Okay, these are people asleep at at the wheel. You want somebody who the instant this comes up, they exactly know what the issue is. And "Hey, when I was at Lovable Replit, we trained the agent. This is how we did it. I brought in this tool. I brought in this tool that that Rory invested in last week. It solved all these issues." That's what you want to hear. And if they haven't brought in a tool in the last 30 days, at least deeply evaluated it. I don't really care whether they bought it, but gone so far down the funnel they can tell you—pick whatever tool: Fixie, Regie, GC, AIGC—I don't care how you went through it, you looked at it, you can tell me the eight ways it would improve the productivity of your business and three you didn't. Just don't hire that person because they're going to run your company to the ground. This is the job today. The job today is not to screw around on ChatGPT and to be a prompt engineer. The job today is to bring the best AI and agentic products into your organization and leverage all the hard work that the engineers have done building those products. That's your job. You don't have to screw around. You don't have to be a prompt engineer anymore. You have to be an agent deployment expert. A—this is the new job we're making up today. An Agentic Deployment Expert. That's your job from C-level to junior. Agentic Deployment Expert. Don't hire anybody else. You're going to regret it. They're going to stare at the camera. He's good. Stare at the camera. He's honorable. We could probably just I could slip away, get a coffee, and come back. No. And I I sound exasperated, Rory. And I—but the reason I am is I can just see I can see my best companies doing it. And I can see some companies I've invested in not doing it. And I want to cry. I just want to cry when they have no ADs on their team. I just—like you're flushing your years of your life down the toilet by not approaching your how you're building this company this way. [24:33] Rory: Yes. And at the risk of being positive, it's worth pointing out two things he didn't say. Well, something implicit why he said—Jason didn't do the only hire, you know, he didn't commit the um employment law, I think it's a civil penalty of saying only employ people below X who get the new new thing because he implicitly said anyone can do it provided you're willing to learn. And I think that's the big aha that's one of the positive statements to make here right? Look and I think it applies—I'm always wary of being "Hey, coming across, hey this this is the things that you all have to do." I think it applies to everyone including investors right? I mean I will say I have found that unless you're willing to invest the time learning these tools you actually shouldn't be investing in them. One of my partners Andy had this expression: "You know, if you decide you want to stop learning new things you probably should retire within 6 to 12 months and never write another check again." Maybe that's down to 3 to 6 months at this stage, right? And I think, you know, it's— [25:27] Harry Stebbings: Yeah, I actually I actually had a meeting with mine and Jason's biggest investor the other day and I—pretend he's not here—I said I think he's the most equipped investor for this generation of investing because I don't think anyone quite sits at the bleeding edge like he does on the investor side. [25:42] Harry Stebbings: Why in terms of using the equip stuff? Yeah. Yeah. In terms of using the stuff, understanding understanding bottlenecks, constraints. For sure. [25:51] Jason Lemkin: But can I just add one point? We can just cuz it's so important if it helps people. Okay, we are—and thank you Harry. We're going through these phases. Okay, and when AI started to blow up for real for us, uh call it early 2024, right? Maybe late '23, I wasn't equipped. It was too technical. I wasn't going to go in and figure out—I wasn't smart enough to figure out how to deal with a massively hallucinating LLM API and turn that and turn that into something magical. Kudos to investors and others that that got it in early '23, '22. I mean I remember I—I guess it was maybe SaaStr Annual '23. I was with David Sacks and I did a Q&A and I said, "How you thinking about AI at Craft?" He's like, "Well we're all in. We want 80% of '23 of investments to be AI." I'm like, "Great but like show me the show me the great ones in market." He's like, "They're all prototypes. We're all they're all they're all proof of concepts but we're all in anyway." That's where you kind of had to be in '23 if you weren't investing at like the LLM level. Okay, I wasn't smart enough. Then we went through this weird-ass prompt engineer era where like you you could torture these products to do something good, right? But you had to torture them. You had to like craft these crazy things that made no sense. Now we are in the era where mere ordinarily smart generalists can make these tools do magical things. And literally I go to these meetings and people be like, "I don't know how to like this is so scary. I don't know how to do this." And we show them our backends. Do you know how to do a workflow generator? Do you know how to do a a decision tree? Like we've been building these since software in the '90s. Okay, if you—I can show you all of our agents. The how they work is novel. They do have to be trained. You can't be lazy and have these agents work. But honestly, the the UI, the UX, the way we interact with them, it's just software. And so my point is: Pick yourself off the ground. This is your time now. If you felt lost in AI era, if you felt like you're behind, you don't understand what all these people are saying on X and Twitter and their Claude and and their and talking about all the 4.6 point Nano point and it's over—like you just it's not your world. This is your time. This is your time for the generalist that knows how to use software tools really really well. And I—this is my last point but it's so important. If ever in your recent life—and this is why you could be all you need to be is young at heart to Rory's point—if in the last three to five years you have successfully deployed a piece of enterprise software of any sort you yourself, not some agency you hired, but if you have deployed it, you can deploy any agentic tool. Any. And you can become the hero in your company and you can become the hero in your functional area. But I watch folks—I'm literally helping a company now that they're adding hundreds of sales folks this year with a new pre-IPO COO—he's not hasn't brought in a single tool, totally scared of it. Okay, it's not that hard. Did you use SalesLoft? Did you use Outreach? Did you use HubSpot? Do you know these tools? If you can deploy these tools, you can deploy a world-changing AI agent. And so this is the time for people like the folks that that were shut out of the AI revolution right now. The generalist folks that are not that know how to deploy software that don't even know how to build software. Like vibe coding for me was folks who knew how to build software, but you didn't have to be an engineer. Now, you just need to know how to deploy software to win with AI agents. That's all you need to know. So many people have these skills and they're petrified of AI. "How did you do that? How did you deploy an AI BDR?" Well, we bought a piece of software, we figured out how it worked for a day, we set it up in an afternoon, and then and then we did spend 30 months training it, which you didn't do with this old software because in the old days, we just had to manually upload all the data, right? And there was no training. The the only non-intuitive part is training these things. And it's it's it's just work. So that's why when I see folks on the management team not doing this, there's no excuse. You do not need to be technical to win with AI agents in Q2 of '26. You do not need to be even 1% technical. Not at all. So it's your time. Or you're going to get laid off. Or you're going to get laid off because you're not going to matter.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2036795243681423518/amplify_video_thumb/2036794127560613888/img/52_cdbzzL6_foTSI.jpg)
