Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

This is insane.🤯 Someone just open-sourced professional motion capture. The same tech behind every Marvel movie and AAA game now runs on any webcam. Free. The only thing it needs is a camera. You already have one. It's called FreeMoCap and it just became a GitHub link. The barrier...

37,669 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 15

Фото профиля Vaibhav Sisinty
Vaibhav Sisinty5 месяцев назад

Repo Link:

Фото профиля Pranav Sharma
Pranav Sharma5 месяцев назад

MediaPipe is already an open-source library by Google. It’s not anything new you might not be familiar with it It basically tracks body landmarks and calculates angles between different body parts to produce outputs like posture or movement analysis.

Фото профиля Ashish
Ashish5 месяцев назад

I registered in the Generative AI Bootcamp INTL - C2 course and exclusive content on Mar 27th, since than I am not able to login in the app. This is the worst ever user experience. I am following up with the Team but not getting any resolution.

Фото профиля GameTalk
GameTalk5 месяцев назад

That person runs like a brick with legs.

Фото профиля Chahid Chirchi
Chahid Chirchi5 месяцев назад

whoa this is wild!! grabbing it for my setup now

Фото профиля Apollo Ridgeway
Apollo Ridgeway5 месяцев назад

Drop the repo

Фото профиля Utkarsh Singh
Utkarsh Singh5 месяцев назад

impressive tech, but it's the learning curve that can turn people off. not everyone wants to dive deep into setup.

Фото профиля Vishal Sourav
Vishal Sourav5 месяцев назад

dont know how you are either mind blown or shocked every other day due to some AI release..

Фото профиля Believer
Believer5 месяцев назад

Big exaggeration, Marvel movies and AAA game studios typically use marker-based optical systems. FreeMoCap uses entirely different technology markerless computer vision

Фото профиля Apex1
Apex15 месяцев назад

FREEMOCAP JUST OPEN-SOURCED MARVEL-LEVEL MOTION CAPTURE… ON ANY WEBCAM FOR FREE No more $50K suits. Indie devs about to COOK the next blockbuster

Фото профиля BoldHyun
BoldHyun5 месяцев назад

FreeMoCap = AAA tech for indie creators. No suit, no studio, just your webcam. Game changed! 🎬

Фото профиля Sadok
Sadok5 месяцев назад

Marvel-level mocap with a webcam

Фото профиля Om Asnani
Om Asnani5 месяцев назад

This democratizes biomechanics research that was gatekept behind $50K+ hardware. Indie game devs are about to go crazy with this — what use case are you most excited to see?

Фото профиля Rohit Yadav
Rohit Yadav5 месяцев назад

not insane just inevitable tools always get cheaper before skills get valuable again the real question is who can actually use this well, not who has access

Фото профиля LeBonPrompt
LeBonPrompt5 месяцев назад

Animation students are about to ship things this year that would've needed a six-figure budget in 2020.

Похожие видео

Dario Amodei was asked whether open source will eventually gut Anthropic's business. He didn't defend the moat. He didn't argue closed beats open. He said the whole question is a red herring. That is the reframe. And it flips how the industry keeps scoring this race. The conventional narrative is inherited from the last era of tech: open source wins because anyone can read the code, anyone improves it, contributions stack, and eventually the free thing catches the paid thing. Investors have a full lexicon for it. Commoditization. Which layer captures the value. Everyone repeats it. Amodei says the analogy breaks at the root. It's called open weights, not open source, for a reason: you can't see inside the model. So the thing that actually made open source powerful elsewhere, many people reading and additively improving shared code, never transfers. You just get a large file of numbers. Now here's where it gets interesting. The second engine isn't ideology. It's infrastructure. Free isn't free. Someone still has to host it. These are big models, and they're hard to run inference on. Someone has to make that fast. And the capabilities people assume only open weights unlock fine tuning, steering, inspecting activations labs are increasingly serving on their own clouds anyway. When DeepSeek shipped, he says he never asked whether it was open. He asked one thing: is it a good model, and is it better than us. That's the only axis he competes on. He even inverts the usual edge. Coming from outside that investor lexicon, he thinks knowing none of it lets him predict this better than the people fluent in it. He is not defending closed models. He is saying the scoreboard everyone is watching measures the wrong thing. The uncomfortable question if the free model still needs someone to run it, was the moat ever the weights, or always the machine underneath ?

Vikram M

58,688 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

elon musk grabbed the source code openai open-sourced by accident, rewrote it in rust over a weekend, and shipped it as a free coding agent that does everything $200/mo chatgpt pro does. why pay $200 to openai and $200 to claude when this runs for $8 the swarm above is one weekend of exactly that: thousands of agents pouring through four endpoints, three paid seats billing $1.80 a task while the free fork bills $0. musk co-founded openai, walked out, and when they left codex on github under a permissive license, he forked it, stamped grok on it, and gave it away what the free version does that the $200 seat charges for: the agent · openai's own engine -> it reads your repo, writes patches, runs your tests, and loops until they pass, exactly like codex -> because under the hood it is codex, just faster and free. you are paying $200 for the paid skin of a tool now sitting on github the license · apache-2.0, un-revocable -> free to use, free to fork, free to ship inside your own product with zero strings -> openai cannot pull it back. musk made sure the license is the kind that never expires the switch · one line, no new tools -> point it at any openai-compatible or claude-compatible endpoint, including an $8 kimi backend -> same terminal, same workflow, gpt-5.6 and opus 5 just quietly lose the seat the bill · $400 down to $8 -> chatgpt pro plus claude max is $400 a month. the free agent plus an $8 kimi key does the same daily work -> that is a 98% cut, built out of openai's own source code, handed to you by the guy suing them here is the part they will fight me on: openai did not lose this to a better model, they lost it to their own license and an enemy with a weekend free. the $200 was never the tool, it was the toll, and musk just put openai's own logo on the road around it drop your $400/mo ai stack to $8. the run above is openai's own agent, rewritten free, doing the job it bills $200 a month for. the full breakdown is in the article below

starmex

111,414 просмотров • 29 дней назад