Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

this is the most dangerous thing on the internet today.. I built a second brain inside Grok Bot. 1000+ agents. Each one keeps its own permanent memory and works without me in the loop. Chief sits in the center of the graph, issues every task and owns every handoff....

beamnxw's profile picture

beamnxw ./

5,705 subscribers

12,397 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

GUYS, STOP F*CKING SLEEPING ON GROK BOT I BUILT A FULL ZERO-SALARY AI ENGINEERING TEAM INSIDE A GROK BOT OVERNIGHT Architect ➜ Harness ➜ Memory ➜ Critic ➜ Implementer ➜ Deployer ➜ Chief of Staff Chief owns the final yes Everything irreversible lands in my approval tray first > Architect ➜ Designs the full system architecture and role structure > Harness ➜ Builds evaluation loops, self-tuning and test harnesses > Memory ➜ Owns persistent memory, retrieval and lifelong context > Critic ➜ Finds real failure modes, runs adversarial tests and edge cases > Implementer ➜ Writes the actual prompts, code and routines > Deployer ➜ Ships live, monitors and runs overnight > Chief of Staff ➜ Only point of contact. Routes all work and holds the approval queue I only talk to Chief The rest hand work forward and keep their own memory I wake up to a sorted queue Read the evidence Hit yes or no One human Six specialists Full engineering floor running 24/7 This is GROK FORGE Read the article if you want to do the same ⭣
0:49

GUYS, STOP F*CKING SLEEPING ON GROK BOT I BUILT A FULL ZERO-SALARY AI ENGINEERING TEAM INSIDE A GROK BOT OVERNIGHT Architect ➜ Harness ➜ Memory ➜ Critic ➜ Implementer ➜ Deployer ➜ Chief of Staff Chief owns the final yes Everything irreversible lands in my approval tray first > Architect ➜ Designs the full system architecture and role structure > Harness ➜ Builds evaluation loops, self-tuning and test harnesses > Memory ➜ Owns persistent memory, retrieval and lifelong context > Critic ➜ Finds real failure modes, runs adversarial tests and edge cases > Implementer ➜ Writes the actual prompts, code and routines > Deployer ➜ Ships live, monitors and runs overnight > Chief of Staff ➜ Only point of contact. Routes all work and holds the approval queue I only talk to Chief The rest hand work forward and keep their own memory I wake up to a sorted queue Read the evidence Hit yes or no One human Six specialists Full engineering floor running 24/7 This is GROK FORGE Read the article if you want to do the same ⭣

beamnxw ./

16,914 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

i honestly don't f*cking understand why no one has done this yet a second brain inside grok bot 1000+ agents with their own memory one CHIEF that issues the work steal the floor plan: CHIEF → signal deck | inbox, threads, archive → orbit deck | calendar, holds, reminders → vault deck | invoices, receipts, ledger → lens deck | scrape, enrich, dedupe → forge deck | reports, charts, briefs → drift deck | outreach, follow ups, send queue CHIEF assigns. decks execute. i approve 1 login. 1 profile copy this and stop running your company from a chat box save this, then start building ⭣
0:33

i honestly don't f*cking understand why no one has done this yet a second brain inside grok bot 1000+ agents with their own memory one CHIEF that issues the work steal the floor plan: CHIEF → signal deck | inbox, threads, archive → orbit deck | calendar, holds, reminders → vault deck | invoices, receipts, ledger → lens deck | scrape, enrich, dedupe → forge deck | reports, charts, briefs → drift deck | outreach, follow ups, send queue CHIEF assigns. decks execute. i approve 1 login. 1 profile copy this and stop running your company from a chat box save this, then start building ⭣

beamnxw ./

14,320 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

i love Grok Grok Bot i do not love my sidebar with 28 random agents here is a simple way to organize your grok bot team: don't grab a template and a cute icon use an org system one chief of staff as the main interface. pin it to the top then project leads, not task bots. they share specialist bots across projects pin the active leaders. hide the specialists use the default colors, don't make your own. it kills the animation and is less functional chief is the only purple bot, and the only cloud shape leads are triangles, each a unique color specialists are all green squares two channels: All Hands every weekday before i'm awake. chief runs this with active project leads. it coordinates projects, resources, and my calendar. then one channel per active project, let your lead bot invite the specialists it needs that's it link to my bot templates below, including one to help you organize your Grok Bots into this exact system and one to clean and back up your workspace
6:25

i love Grok Grok Bot i do not love my sidebar with 28 random agents here is a simple way to organize your grok bot team: don't grab a template and a cute icon use an org system one chief of staff as the main interface. pin it to the top then project leads, not task bots. they share specialist bots across projects pin the active leaders. hide the specialists use the default colors, don't make your own. it kills the animation and is less functional chief is the only purple bot, and the only cloud shape leads are triangles, each a unique color specialists are all green squares two channels: All Hands every weekday before i'm awake. chief runs this with active project leads. it coordinates projects, resources, and my calendar. then one channel per active project, let your lead bot invite the specialists it needs that's it link to my bot templates below, including one to help you organize your Grok Bots into this exact system and one to clean and back up your workspace

Aaron Makelky

15,697 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

HOLY SH*T. I BUILT A 24/7 AI TRADING FLOOR INSIDE GROK BOT Six AI agents, six cloud terminals and one Chief of Staff now operate as a single desk, researching, challenging and routing ideas while my laptop stays closed. The morning call starts at 4:00 AM. I am not in it. TAPE → watches the prints and flags unusual size QUANT → refits the models whenever they drift MACRO → handles the Asia handover, oil, rates and FX RISK → controls exposure and keeps VAR pinned FLOW → reads sweeps and block trades PM → keeps the book Above them sits GROK BOT. The Chief of Staff never trades. It checks every handoff, rejects weak signals and escalates only the decision that genuinely requires a human. Research → risk review → execution → visible audit trail No meetings. No status updates. No one asking whether the work is finished. What looks like a trading terminal is actually an organization compiled into software. Every agent has its own computer, browser, memory and responsibility, yet the entire operation remains visible on one screen. The market data in this prototype is simulated. The operating model isn’t.
0:54

HOLY SH*T. I BUILT A 24/7 AI TRADING FLOOR INSIDE GROK BOT Six AI agents, six cloud terminals and one Chief of Staff now operate as a single desk, researching, challenging and routing ideas while my laptop stays closed. The morning call starts at 4:00 AM. I am not in it. TAPE → watches the prints and flags unusual size QUANT → refits the models whenever they drift MACRO → handles the Asia handover, oil, rates and FX RISK → controls exposure and keeps VAR pinned FLOW → reads sweeps and block trades PM → keeps the book Above them sits GROK BOT. The Chief of Staff never trades. It checks every handoff, rejects weak signals and escalates only the decision that genuinely requires a human. Research → risk review → execution → visible audit trail No meetings. No status updates. No one asking whether the work is finished. What looks like a trading terminal is actually an organization compiled into software. Every agent has its own computer, browser, memory and responsibility, yet the entire operation remains visible on one screen. The market data in this prototype is simulated. The operating model isn’t.

BuBBliK

324,716 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

Jamie Dimon made $39 million last year to decide who does what at JPMorgan. One AI agent on Grok Bot does that job for $300 a month, and it hires the rest of the agents itself. Stop trying to manage any of it yourself. In 2026 a swarm of AI agents runs a team better than you do. I told my chief agent one thing. Make money or I switch you off. It took $1,000 to $3,900 in 15 hours. Every fill is on chain and the address is in my profile. I never picked a trade. I never picked a team either. The agents it hired: > a scout that hunts for what is moving and where the money is going > a forensics agent that works out who is really behind the buying > a reader that watches the mood on X, and it sees every post on this app because it is Grok > a risk agent whose only power is saying no, and its no beats every score on the desk > a treasurer that holds the money rules and the kill switch > a trader that writes the exit before it writes the entry None of those were my idea. I handed out one job title and the chief filled in the rest on its own. And the swarm is different every hour. Agents appear for one job, do it, and are gone before I know they existed. A hedge fund pays millions a year for the same org chart, and almost all of that goes on salaries. Every prompt and the whole story of my Grok Bot fund is in the post below ↓ Save it before you try to run one of these by hand.
0:50

Jamie Dimon made $39 million last year to decide who does what at JPMorgan. One AI agent on Grok Bot does that job for $300 a month, and it hires the rest of the agents itself. Stop trying to manage any of it yourself. In 2026 a swarm of AI agents runs a team better than you do. I told my chief agent one thing. Make money or I switch you off. It took $1,000 to $3,900 in 15 hours. Every fill is on chain and the address is in my profile. I never picked a trade. I never picked a team either. The agents it hired: > a scout that hunts for what is moving and where the money is going > a forensics agent that works out who is really behind the buying > a reader that watches the mood on X, and it sees every post on this app because it is Grok > a risk agent whose only power is saying no, and its no beats every score on the desk > a treasurer that holds the money rules and the kill switch > a trader that writes the exit before it writes the entry None of those were my idea. I handed out one job title and the chief filled in the rest on its own. And the swarm is different every hour. Agents appear for one job, do it, and are gone before I know they existed. A hedge fund pays millions a year for the same org chart, and almost all of that goes on salaries. Every prompt and the whole story of my Grok Bot fund is in the post below ↓ Save it before you try to run one of these by hand.

cvxv666

28,886 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

Elon Musk, absolute leader of the AI race with Grok Bot, and it's not a joke anymore. Ultimate guide on god-mode setup of Grok Bot, the org chart that runs while you sleep, step by step: A Chief of Staff sits in the middle with no tools of its own, BUT it reads the outcome you gave it, picks who does what, and never does the work itself. That one rule is why it never turns into the bottleneck you hired it to remove. → Researcher pulls real sources and tracks what's actually moving, not what sounds true → Writer turns that into finished copy while the research is still in the room → Visualiser gets three reference visuals once, then ships everything in that style forever → Analyst reads what performed and tells the rest of the team what to stop doing → Scheduler owns timing and holds the queue → Publisher actually ships What makes it different from every AI tool you've used: each bot gets its own computer in the cloud, its own browser, its own files, and they all share one memory. So the research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. Nothing gets copy-pasted between tabs, nothing waits on you to approve step four of nine. And you never write a workflow for it. You hit record, do the job once the way you actually do it, stop. It pulls out the steps, saves them as a skill, and puts it on a schedule. The shape you're aiming for on every bot: everything reversible finished, nothing sent. 36 drafts queued, 0 published. It does all the work and stops dead at the one line only you can cross. You stop prompting. You start assigning. Full charter blocks, the approval line and the routines are in the article below ↓
0:24

Elon Musk, absolute leader of the AI race with Grok Bot, and it's not a joke anymore. Ultimate guide on god-mode setup of Grok Bot, the org chart that runs while you sleep, step by step: A Chief of Staff sits in the middle with no tools of its own, BUT it reads the outcome you gave it, picks who does what, and never does the work itself. That one rule is why it never turns into the bottleneck you hired it to remove. → Researcher pulls real sources and tracks what's actually moving, not what sounds true → Writer turns that into finished copy while the research is still in the room → Visualiser gets three reference visuals once, then ships everything in that style forever → Analyst reads what performed and tells the rest of the team what to stop doing → Scheduler owns timing and holds the queue → Publisher actually ships What makes it different from every AI tool you've used: each bot gets its own computer in the cloud, its own browser, its own files, and they all share one memory. So the research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. Nothing gets copy-pasted between tabs, nothing waits on you to approve step four of nine. And you never write a workflow for it. You hit record, do the job once the way you actually do it, stop. It pulls out the steps, saves them as a skill, and puts it on a schedule. The shape you're aiming for on every bot: everything reversible finished, nothing sent. 36 drafts queued, 0 published. It does all the work and stops dead at the one line only you can cross. You stop prompting. You start assigning. Full charter blocks, the approval line and the routines are in the article below ↓

Miraqle

87,098 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

12 GROK BOT AGENTS TURNED $50 INTO $2,000 IN 2 DAY Grok Bot by Elon Musk is running a trading floor for me. Twelve agents, three markets, and I can literally watch every one of them walk, work, and earn. The morning call is at 4am. I am not in it. Millennium runs 330 pods with desks laid out exactly like this one. Mine is a pixel office in a browser tab. > TAPE watches the prints and calls out size hitting the offer > VERIFY re-checks every number and kills the ones that lie > QUANT sits on the models and refits them the moment they drift > MACRO takes the Asia handover before I wake up > RISK holds the stops and opens every report with the worst fact > FLOW reads the sweeps and the funding flips The CHIEF never trades. He routes the work, checks every handoff and when someone books a loss, he walks across the floor and bonks him on the head. That is not a joke feature. That is the org chart. Three floors, one office: > CRYPTO $BTC / $ETH / $SOL on live Binance prints. The Michael Saylor runs it. > MEME $GROKSTREET / $ANSEM / $GATO live from A black Charging Bull statue glows emerald over the desks. Ansem 🐂🀄️ is literally The Black Bull. > INDEX $TSLA / $NVDA / $SPX. The quiet floor. Nobody trades rumors here. Boss on this floor is Elon Musk And the math is the honest part. $50 to $2,000 is 40x which sounds insane until you do the log: +0.5% compounded needs about 740 trades. A human cannot take 740 disciplined trades without tilting. Twelve agents that never sleep, never revenge-trade and never "feel it"can. The floor is alive. Monitors light up when an agent sits down. Earnings pop over their heads +$0.12, +$0.17. Two agents hit at once and confetti flies: DOUBLE WIN. They carry the cash to the vault and you watch the coins go. Book hits +25% and the screen freezes to crown the top earner. Nobody softens the red days at breakfast it is on the screen. A trading floor used to mean a lease, a payroll and a compliance officer. Mine is one HTML file. No server, no VPS, no dev to wait on. Thank you Elon Musk and the SpaceXAI team Grok Bot didn't give us a chatbot, it gave us employees. I supplied $50 and the rules. The agents supplied the boring trades. Walk the floor below.
0:29

12 GROK BOT AGENTS TURNED $50 INTO $2,000 IN 2 DAY Grok Bot by Elon Musk is running a trading floor for me. Twelve agents, three markets, and I can literally watch every one of them walk, work, and earn. The morning call is at 4am. I am not in it. Millennium runs 330 pods with desks laid out exactly like this one. Mine is a pixel office in a browser tab. > TAPE watches the prints and calls out size hitting the offer > VERIFY re-checks every number and kills the ones that lie > QUANT sits on the models and refits them the moment they drift > MACRO takes the Asia handover before I wake up > RISK holds the stops and opens every report with the worst fact > FLOW reads the sweeps and the funding flips The CHIEF never trades. He routes the work, checks every handoff and when someone books a loss, he walks across the floor and bonks him on the head. That is not a joke feature. That is the org chart. Three floors, one office: > CRYPTO $BTC / $ETH / $SOL on live Binance prints. The Michael Saylor runs it. > MEME $GROKSTREET / $ANSEM / $GATO live from A black Charging Bull statue glows emerald over the desks. Ansem 🐂🀄️ is literally The Black Bull. > INDEX $TSLA / $NVDA / $SPX. The quiet floor. Nobody trades rumors here. Boss on this floor is Elon Musk And the math is the honest part. $50 to $2,000 is 40x which sounds insane until you do the log: +0.5% compounded needs about 740 trades. A human cannot take 740 disciplined trades without tilting. Twelve agents that never sleep, never revenge-trade and never "feel it"can. The floor is alive. Monitors light up when an agent sits down. Earnings pop over their heads +$0.12, +$0.17. Two agents hit at once and confetti flies: DOUBLE WIN. They carry the cash to the vault and you watch the coins go. Book hits +25% and the screen freezes to crown the top earner. Nobody softens the red days at breakfast it is on the screen. A trading floor used to mean a lease, a payroll and a compliance officer. Mine is one HTML file. No server, no VPS, no dev to wait on. Thank you Elon Musk and the SpaceXAI team Grok Bot didn't give us a chatbot, it gave us employees. I supplied $50 and the rules. The agents supplied the boring trades. Walk the floor below.

AdiiX

215,140 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

One bot. One prompt. It hired its own team. I created a single Grok Bot - Atlas, chief of staff - and pasted one prompt. It interviewed me, wrote its own operating manual, specced four teammates, and launched them. Watch the sidebar: Kit, Studio, Ship, Peak come online one by one. Each of them gets its own computer in the cloud. Six routines scheduled. The team runs while my laptop is closed. And nothing sends, posts, or ships without my yes. That rule is in the prompt. Full setup prompt in the first reply. Steal it.
0:59

One bot. One prompt. It hired its own team. I created a single Grok Bot - Atlas, chief of staff - and pasted one prompt. It interviewed me, wrote its own operating manual, specced four teammates, and launched them. Watch the sidebar: Kit, Studio, Ship, Peak come online one by one. Each of them gets its own computer in the cloud. Six routines scheduled. The team runs while my laptop is closed. And nothing sends, posts, or ships without my yes. That rule is in the prompt. Full setup prompt in the first reply. Steal it.

nyk

30,830 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

Grok Bot Galaxy starts tomorrow with three days of SpaceX AI building an entire company live, and a seven-agent content system with researcher, writer, visualiser, analyst, scheduler and publisher is already finished and running with zero code and ten minutes to stand up. → Chief of staff routes every task, nothing publishes without human approval → Seven agents, one narrow job each, fixed handoff order → Content is six jobs when done manually, this collapses all six into one system → The thing between most people and revenue was never the idea, it was throughput
0:30

Grok Bot Galaxy starts tomorrow with three days of SpaceX AI building an entire company live, and a seven-agent content system with researcher, writer, visualiser, analyst, scheduler and publisher is already finished and running with zero code and ten minutes to stand up. → Chief of staff routes every task, nothing publishes without human approval → Seven agents, one narrow job each, fixed handoff order → Content is six jobs when done manually, this collapses all six into one system → The thing between most people and revenue was never the idea, it was throughput

0xMarioNawfal

48,165 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

WTF, GROK BOT JUST MADE AI AGENTS AVAILABLE TO LITERALLY ANYONE – CREATING CONTENT HAS NEVER BEEN THIS EASY, EVEN IF YOU'VE NEVER MADE ANYTHING BEFORE Content was never a talent problem. It's a headcount problem. One person doing research, design, copy, analytics, timing and publishing – that's six jobs. The switching between them is what kills consistency, not a lack of ideas. Here's what one of these setups actually looks like. A Chief of Staff sits in the middle and routes every task. Nothing lands on the human. → Researcher tracks what's actually moving and pulls real sources instead of guesswork → Writer turns that research into finished copy, ready to review → Visualiser gets fed a few reference visuals once, then ships everything in that style → Analyst reads the numbers and tells the rest of the team what worked → Scheduler owns timing and holds the queue → Publisher ships it The part that makes it work: every agent on Grok Bot gets its own persistent computer, browser and file system – and they all share memory. So the research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. No copy-pasting between tools. No approving every step. No human in the middle. You can even teach an agent a repetitive task by recording yourself doing it once. Start recording, do the thing, stop. It learns the pattern. And that's the real shift. Nobody needs AI to tell them what to post. They need it to delete the 40 steps between the idea and the post. Everyone has a backlog of things they've meant to make for months. This is what starts clearing it. Full breakdown of the setup in the article below ↓
0:20

WTF, GROK BOT JUST MADE AI AGENTS AVAILABLE TO LITERALLY ANYONE – CREATING CONTENT HAS NEVER BEEN THIS EASY, EVEN IF YOU'VE NEVER MADE ANYTHING BEFORE Content was never a talent problem. It's a headcount problem. One person doing research, design, copy, analytics, timing and publishing – that's six jobs. The switching between them is what kills consistency, not a lack of ideas. Here's what one of these setups actually looks like. A Chief of Staff sits in the middle and routes every task. Nothing lands on the human. → Researcher tracks what's actually moving and pulls real sources instead of guesswork → Writer turns that research into finished copy, ready to review → Visualiser gets fed a few reference visuals once, then ships everything in that style → Analyst reads the numbers and tells the rest of the team what worked → Scheduler owns timing and holds the queue → Publisher ships it The part that makes it work: every agent on Grok Bot gets its own persistent computer, browser and file system – and they all share memory. So the research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. No copy-pasting between tools. No approving every step. No human in the middle. You can even teach an agent a repetitive task by recording yourself doing it once. Start recording, do the thing, stop. It learns the pattern. And that's the real shift. Nobody needs AI to tell them what to post. They need it to delete the 40 steps between the idea and the post. Everyone has a backlog of things they've meant to make for months. This is what starts clearing it. Full breakdown of the setup in the article below ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

4,818,742 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

MY GROK BOT CONTENT SYSTEM JUST WENT VIRAL ON X – SO I THINK YOU NEED TO SEE WHAT'S ACTUALLY IN IT It wasn't the visual that got people. It was realizing this is already possible, today, for anyone. That's the part worth saying out loud. AI agents used to be a developer thing. You needed an API key, a server, a framework, and a weekend you weren't getting back. Grok Bot deleted all of that. You describe the job in plain language, and you have an agent that does it – with its own computer, its own browser, its own files, running whether you're at the desk or not. Which means the question stopped being can I build this and became what do I point it at. People are pointing it at everything: sales outreach, research, SEO, bookkeeping, customer replies, personal admin. This one is aimed at the thing most people say they'll start and never do – publishing consistently. It's seven agents. One in the centre, six in orbit. Here's what each one actually does. CHIEF OF STAFF – the centre. Every request lands here first, gets broken into jobs, and gets routed to whoever owns that kind of work. It chases what's late, keeps the others from duplicating each other, and surfaces exactly one thing to me when a real decision is needed. Everything else it just handles. RESEARCHER – goes out and finds what's actually moving in the niche. Reads the sources, checks the claim, drops the duplicates, and hands over a brief with links attached. Not "here's what I think" – here's what's true and where it came from. WRITER – takes that brief and writes the finished piece in my voice. Hooks, threads, captions, long-form. It's had my old posts as reference, so what comes back isn't a draft I rewrite – it's a draft I approve. VISUALISER – I fed it my reference visuals once. Now every cover, image and dashboard comes back in that exact style, without a single new instruction. This is the agent that kills the "I have the post but no visual" excuse. ANALYST – reads what actually performed. Not vanity numbers: which hook shape landed, which format died, which time slot was dead air. Then it tells the Writer and the Scheduler what to do differently. This is the loop almost every setup is missing, and it's why most of them plateau. SCHEDULER – owns timing. Holds the queue, spaces things properly, protects the calendar, and makes sure nothing ships into an empty feed at 3am. PUBLISHER – ships it. Formats per platform, posts, confirms it went out, logs it back to the Chief. The reason it holds together instead of falling apart: they share memory. The research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. No copy-pasting between tools, no re-explaining context, no approving every step. And you can teach any of them a repetitive task by recording yourself doing it – start recording, do the thing, stop. I wrote the whole thing up below – every agent, what each one is told, how they hand off, and how to wire it together. Read it and you can start building this today, not "eventually" ↓
0:40

MY GROK BOT CONTENT SYSTEM JUST WENT VIRAL ON X – SO I THINK YOU NEED TO SEE WHAT'S ACTUALLY IN IT It wasn't the visual that got people. It was realizing this is already possible, today, for anyone. That's the part worth saying out loud. AI agents used to be a developer thing. You needed an API key, a server, a framework, and a weekend you weren't getting back. Grok Bot deleted all of that. You describe the job in plain language, and you have an agent that does it – with its own computer, its own browser, its own files, running whether you're at the desk or not. Which means the question stopped being can I build this and became what do I point it at. People are pointing it at everything: sales outreach, research, SEO, bookkeeping, customer replies, personal admin. This one is aimed at the thing most people say they'll start and never do – publishing consistently. It's seven agents. One in the centre, six in orbit. Here's what each one actually does. CHIEF OF STAFF – the centre. Every request lands here first, gets broken into jobs, and gets routed to whoever owns that kind of work. It chases what's late, keeps the others from duplicating each other, and surfaces exactly one thing to me when a real decision is needed. Everything else it just handles. RESEARCHER – goes out and finds what's actually moving in the niche. Reads the sources, checks the claim, drops the duplicates, and hands over a brief with links attached. Not "here's what I think" – here's what's true and where it came from. WRITER – takes that brief and writes the finished piece in my voice. Hooks, threads, captions, long-form. It's had my old posts as reference, so what comes back isn't a draft I rewrite – it's a draft I approve. VISUALISER – I fed it my reference visuals once. Now every cover, image and dashboard comes back in that exact style, without a single new instruction. This is the agent that kills the "I have the post but no visual" excuse. ANALYST – reads what actually performed. Not vanity numbers: which hook shape landed, which format died, which time slot was dead air. Then it tells the Writer and the Scheduler what to do differently. This is the loop almost every setup is missing, and it's why most of them plateau. SCHEDULER – owns timing. Holds the queue, spaces things properly, protects the calendar, and makes sure nothing ships into an empty feed at 3am. PUBLISHER – ships it. Formats per platform, posts, confirms it went out, logs it back to the Chief. The reason it holds together instead of falling apart: they share memory. The research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. No copy-pasting between tools, no re-explaining context, no approving every step. And you can teach any of them a repetitive task by recording yourself doing it – start recording, do the thing, stop. I wrote the whole thing up below – every agent, what each one is told, how they hand off, and how to wire it together. Read it and you can start building this today, not "eventually" ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

10,486 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

I gave Elon Musk's new Grok Bot an org chart instead of a to-do list, and in one week I stopped being a founder who does the work and became one who assigns it. eight bots. one org chart. nobody sleeps but me. here's the whole design, steal it. step 1 → 0:01 What we're covering step 2 → 2:01 Installation & Setup step 3 → 3:14 Building the First Bot step 4 → 8:18 Teaching by Screen Recording step 5 → 14:18 Putting it All Together THE ROSTER: Atlas, chief of staff. the only bot I talk to. I give it outcomes, never tasks. it decomposes them and delegates to the team in group chat, and it never does specialist work itself. it posts the plan every morning and what shipped every night, and it only comes to me when a decision is irreversible or spends money. Scout, research. finds and qualifies my ICP. every day: 25 verified prospects, one line on why they need us right now, and a source. if it can't verify, it marks it unverified. it never guesses. Quill, content. turns what the company learned this week into 5 posts and 1 long piece, in my voice, matched from the last 50 things I wrote. drafts only, it never publishes. Pitch, outbound. writes a first touch and two follow-ups for everyone Scout marks ready. 60 words max, one specific observation about their business, one clear ask. queued in drafts, I approve in bulk. Vault, inbox and ops. triages everything into needs-me, needs-a-bot, needs-nothing. it handles the last, routes the middle, and gives me five bullets on the first by 9am. Ledger, analyst. one report a night: what moved, what didn't, and the single number I should care about tomorrow. no dashboards, no adjectives. HOW THEY'RE WIRED one group chat per outcome, not per person. Atlas sits in all of them. the bots hand off inside the chat, so I only read the handoff, I never manage it. two rules that made this actually work: 1. every charter ends with a hard "never do this without asking" line. autonomy without a fence is just chaos on a schedule. 2. show once, don't describe. I ran the full workflow on my screen one time. that single demo taught them more than a page of instructions ever could. WEEK ONE 214 verified prospects delivered. 89 personalized outreaches queued and approved. inbox at zero every morning. 11 content pieces ready. THE POINT most people are still treating Grok Bot like a smarter chat window. it isn't. it's the first time one person can own an org chart instead of a to-do list. my bottleneck was never how much I could do, it was how much I could hand off. bookmark this.
18:40

I gave Elon Musk's new Grok Bot an org chart instead of a to-do list, and in one week I stopped being a founder who does the work and became one who assigns it. eight bots. one org chart. nobody sleeps but me. here's the whole design, steal it. step 1 → 0:01 What we're covering step 2 → 2:01 Installation & Setup step 3 → 3:14 Building the First Bot step 4 → 8:18 Teaching by Screen Recording step 5 → 14:18 Putting it All Together THE ROSTER: Atlas, chief of staff. the only bot I talk to. I give it outcomes, never tasks. it decomposes them and delegates to the team in group chat, and it never does specialist work itself. it posts the plan every morning and what shipped every night, and it only comes to me when a decision is irreversible or spends money. Scout, research. finds and qualifies my ICP. every day: 25 verified prospects, one line on why they need us right now, and a source. if it can't verify, it marks it unverified. it never guesses. Quill, content. turns what the company learned this week into 5 posts and 1 long piece, in my voice, matched from the last 50 things I wrote. drafts only, it never publishes. Pitch, outbound. writes a first touch and two follow-ups for everyone Scout marks ready. 60 words max, one specific observation about their business, one clear ask. queued in drafts, I approve in bulk. Vault, inbox and ops. triages everything into needs-me, needs-a-bot, needs-nothing. it handles the last, routes the middle, and gives me five bullets on the first by 9am. Ledger, analyst. one report a night: what moved, what didn't, and the single number I should care about tomorrow. no dashboards, no adjectives. HOW THEY'RE WIRED one group chat per outcome, not per person. Atlas sits in all of them. the bots hand off inside the chat, so I only read the handoff, I never manage it. two rules that made this actually work: 1. every charter ends with a hard "never do this without asking" line. autonomy without a fence is just chaos on a schedule. 2. show once, don't describe. I ran the full workflow on my screen one time. that single demo taught them more than a page of instructions ever could. WEEK ONE 214 verified prospects delivered. 89 personalized outreaches queued and approved. inbox at zero every morning. 11 content pieces ready. THE POINT most people are still treating Grok Bot like a smarter chat window. it isn't. it's the first time one person can own an org chart instead of a to-do list. my bottleneck was never how much I could do, it was how much I could hand off. bookmark this.

Ridark

1,267,623 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

#WATCH | Chennai | BJP leader Tamilisai Soundararajan says, "I wish everyone a happy Diwali and we are not like the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister. We will be wishing each and every one. I condemn the Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister for wishing Diwali only to the believers... Even after appealing in the assembly, they have not done it...I strongly condemn the Chief Minister and even the INDI alliance partners who believe in the Hindu religious ideology, who believe in the culture of our country, should condemn their ally, DMK...This type of discrimination cannot be accepted in this country. So I strongly condemn the Chief Minister and the Deputy Chief Minister for not respecting the sentiments of the Hindu brothers and sisters..."
3:42

#WATCH | Chennai | BJP leader Tamilisai Soundararajan says, "I wish everyone a happy Diwali and we are not like the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister. We will be wishing each and every one. I condemn the Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister for wishing Diwali only to the believers... Even after appealing in the assembly, they have not done it...I strongly condemn the Chief Minister and even the INDI alliance partners who believe in the Hindu religious ideology, who believe in the culture of our country, should condemn their ally, DMK...This type of discrimination cannot be accepted in this country. So I strongly condemn the Chief Minister and the Deputy Chief Minister for not respecting the sentiments of the Hindu brothers and sisters..."

ANI

58,039 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

MY GROK BOT AGENTS TURNED $40 INTO $6,700 IN 9 HOURS I built the desk because my worst decisions were rarely caused by missing information. they happened because I was trying to do seven jobs at once - find the signal, check the context, inspect the risk, watch wallets, enter, manage the position and remember why I was there so I stopped asking Grok Bot for isolated calls and made it the brain of a trading desk → SCOUT finds fresh signals → ANALYST checks context and market depth → RISK can kill any route → WHALE watches large wallet movement → SNIPER receives only cleared entries → EXIT manages the open position → LEDGER records the decision and its outcome Grok Core reads every desk, resolves conflicts and routes only what survives the chain. no agent can approve its own risk, and no specialist gets control of the whole account I gave the system a capped $40 mandate and one day to work the closing balance was $6,700 that does not prove the next run will look the same. one day can still be luck, and the full starting balance can disappear. strategy changes, new permissions and anything outside the mandate still wait for me the part worth keeping is the structure: seven narrow jobs, one shared memory and one brain keeping the desk synchronized while I am away the video shows that desk from the inside. the full build is in the article below ↓
0:29

MY GROK BOT AGENTS TURNED $40 INTO $6,700 IN 9 HOURS I built the desk because my worst decisions were rarely caused by missing information. they happened because I was trying to do seven jobs at once - find the signal, check the context, inspect the risk, watch wallets, enter, manage the position and remember why I was there so I stopped asking Grok Bot for isolated calls and made it the brain of a trading desk → SCOUT finds fresh signals → ANALYST checks context and market depth → RISK can kill any route → WHALE watches large wallet movement → SNIPER receives only cleared entries → EXIT manages the open position → LEDGER records the decision and its outcome Grok Core reads every desk, resolves conflicts and routes only what survives the chain. no agent can approve its own risk, and no specialist gets control of the whole account I gave the system a capped $40 mandate and one day to work the closing balance was $6,700 that does not prove the next run will look the same. one day can still be luck, and the full starting balance can disappear. strategy changes, new permissions and anything outside the mandate still wait for me the part worth keeping is the structure: seven narrow jobs, one shared memory and one brain keeping the desk synchronized while I am away the video shows that desk from the inside. the full build is in the article below ↓

88n77

30,258 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

42 AI agents now run an entire sales department. Not one of them takes a salary. Hundreds of thousands in payroll. Gone in a weekend. At the top sits the chief sales officer. It delegates to every team’s manager. Outreach writes the emails, runs voice, fires SMS across 8 languages. RevOps wires HubSpot into the data warehouse. Research scores every lead and preps every call before a rep walks in. Then the part that breaks your brain. They talk to each other. The researcher hands context to the email writer. The call analyst feeds the follow up drafter. 42 specialists. 1 nervous system. This isn’t a chatbot. It’s an org chart that compounds while I sleep. And it’s day 1. Over the next 30 days this becomes a full company. Every department. Every role. Nobody on payroll. The last team I’ll ever have to hire. Want the full breakdown of all 42 agents and the org chart? Comment 42 and I’ll send it through.
1:16

42 AI agents now run an entire sales department. Not one of them takes a salary. Hundreds of thousands in payroll. Gone in a weekend. At the top sits the chief sales officer. It delegates to every team’s manager. Outreach writes the emails, runs voice, fires SMS across 8 languages. RevOps wires HubSpot into the data warehouse. Research scores every lead and preps every call before a rep walks in. Then the part that breaks your brain. They talk to each other. The researcher hands context to the email writer. The call analyst feeds the follow up drafter. 42 specialists. 1 nervous system. This isn’t a chatbot. It’s an org chart that compounds while I sleep. And it’s day 1. Over the next 30 days this becomes a full company. Every department. Every role. Nobody on payroll. The last team I’ll ever have to hire. Want the full breakdown of all 42 agents and the org chart? Comment 42 and I’ll send it through.

West Lord

29,206 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Elon Musk shipped Grok Bot as an AI teammate that sorts your email and watches your competitors. I gave mine a harder brief: build a trading floor that runs itself, and then run it 24/7. GROKSTREET. Fourteen agents. Eleven desks, three chiefs, three offices, one vault. It lives in a browser tab and it does not stop. WHY GROK BOT MAKES THIS WORK Most people misread the architecture. It is not one sandbox per agent. It is ONE persistent cloud computer per account, and every Bot gets its own screen on it. Shared filesystem at /workspace, shared browser sessions, shared credentials. That is the whole unlock. One Bot picks up exactly where another left off. No re-auth, no copy-paste between agents, no state lost at the handoff. A floor is only possible because the desks share a building. The head-of-desk role is not something I invented either. "Manages your other Bots and pulls you in for decisions" ships as a first-class Bot template. Routing and escalation are built in. Skills carry the how. Routines carry the when on a schedule, or off a Slack or GitHub event. Subagents fan out as child sessions with their own context and hand a summary back. Fifty routines per Bot. THE DESKS Every desk holds its own book, hit rate and drawdown, and sizes its own risk: Kelly, with the guard rails written in f* = W − (1−W)/R clamped to [0.01, 0.25]. Under 12 samples it does not pretend to know it defaults to 0.05. Volatility is RiskMetrics EWMA σ²_t = λσ²_{t-1} + (1−λ)r²_t, λ = 0.94 Hit rates carry Wilson 95% intervals, z = 1.96. A desk is only flagged for edge decay when the UPPER bound falls below 0.5, never on raw small-sample noise. Three-for-three is not sixty-for-ninety. Capital routes between desks by softmax on measured Sharpe. THE FLOOR Three chiefs meet in the war room every 3.5 minutes and argue. One reports, another presses him, he concedes or proposes. 14,208 sentence shapes before live figures fill the slots and every slot is filled from that chief's own desks. The crypto chief cannot quote meme numbers. A desk holding $25 gets up, walks to the vault and banks it. The transfer is atomic on arrival, so an interrupted walk cannot destroy cash. Every desk wears its last trade above its head. Green with a tick, red with a cross. You see who the chief is about to praise and who he is about to hit before he gets there. BTC, ETH and SOL come off Kraken server-side. The tape is real. THE BUILD 16 modules. 7,572 lines. Zero npm dependencies. No React. No bundler. No game engine. Vanilla JavaScript on Canvas 2D and a Go binary with the entire world embedded in it. Ships as one 2.3 MB HTML file. 60fps on every floor, zero dropped frames. WHAT I FOUND BY MEASURING INSTEAD OF LOOKING The roster read one number for a desk and the chief's card read another, so a desk could show +$16 in the list and $0 when the chief walked over. Every desk was crediting itself twice. Money could vanish if a walk to the vault got interrupted. Three money bugs, none of them visible by watching. All fixed and instrumented. DIRECTOR MODE Open it with?show and the camera runs itself. It cuts to the war room while a chief is mid-sentence, to whichever office just cleared money, and never cuts away in the middle of a line. Point a screen recorder at it and walk away. The math is real, the feed is real, the engineering is real. The flex is the engine, not a P&L screenshot.
0:39

Elon Musk shipped Grok Bot as an AI teammate that sorts your email and watches your competitors. I gave mine a harder brief: build a trading floor that runs itself, and then run it 24/7. GROKSTREET. Fourteen agents. Eleven desks, three chiefs, three offices, one vault. It lives in a browser tab and it does not stop. WHY GROK BOT MAKES THIS WORK Most people misread the architecture. It is not one sandbox per agent. It is ONE persistent cloud computer per account, and every Bot gets its own screen on it. Shared filesystem at /workspace, shared browser sessions, shared credentials. That is the whole unlock. One Bot picks up exactly where another left off. No re-auth, no copy-paste between agents, no state lost at the handoff. A floor is only possible because the desks share a building. The head-of-desk role is not something I invented either. "Manages your other Bots and pulls you in for decisions" ships as a first-class Bot template. Routing and escalation are built in. Skills carry the how. Routines carry the when on a schedule, or off a Slack or GitHub event. Subagents fan out as child sessions with their own context and hand a summary back. Fifty routines per Bot. THE DESKS Every desk holds its own book, hit rate and drawdown, and sizes its own risk: Kelly, with the guard rails written in f* = W − (1−W)/R clamped to [0.01, 0.25]. Under 12 samples it does not pretend to know it defaults to 0.05. Volatility is RiskMetrics EWMA σ²_t = λσ²_{t-1} + (1−λ)r²_t, λ = 0.94 Hit rates carry Wilson 95% intervals, z = 1.96. A desk is only flagged for edge decay when the UPPER bound falls below 0.5, never on raw small-sample noise. Three-for-three is not sixty-for-ninety. Capital routes between desks by softmax on measured Sharpe. THE FLOOR Three chiefs meet in the war room every 3.5 minutes and argue. One reports, another presses him, he concedes or proposes. 14,208 sentence shapes before live figures fill the slots and every slot is filled from that chief's own desks. The crypto chief cannot quote meme numbers. A desk holding $25 gets up, walks to the vault and banks it. The transfer is atomic on arrival, so an interrupted walk cannot destroy cash. Every desk wears its last trade above its head. Green with a tick, red with a cross. You see who the chief is about to praise and who he is about to hit before he gets there. BTC, ETH and SOL come off Kraken server-side. The tape is real. THE BUILD 16 modules. 7,572 lines. Zero npm dependencies. No React. No bundler. No game engine. Vanilla JavaScript on Canvas 2D and a Go binary with the entire world embedded in it. Ships as one 2.3 MB HTML file. 60fps on every floor, zero dropped frames. WHAT I FOUND BY MEASURING INSTEAD OF LOOKING The roster read one number for a desk and the chief's card read another, so a desk could show +$16 in the list and $0 when the chief walked over. Every desk was crediting itself twice. Money could vanish if a walk to the vault got interrupted. Three money bugs, none of them visible by watching. All fixed and instrumented. DIRECTOR MODE Open it with?show and the camera runs itself. It cuts to the war room while a chief is mid-sentence, to whichever office just cleared money, and never cuts away in the middle of a line. Point a screen recorder at it and walk away. The math is real, the feed is real, the engineering is real. The flex is the engine, not a P&L screenshot.

AdiiX

51,085 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

I turned Grok Bot into one giant AI brain and gave it life and death over every agent under it. Its only incentive: make money or die. 290% overnight. The thing really did not want to be switched off. $1,000 went in. $3,900 came out. 15 hours, and I slept through most of it. One of the agents it hired is not allowed to trade at all. That one is the reason the rest are still alive. Every prompt and the whole build is in the post below ↓ Save it. The wiring is the whole trick, and it reads in four minutes.
0:51

I turned Grok Bot into one giant AI brain and gave it life and death over every agent under it. Its only incentive: make money or die. 290% overnight. The thing really did not want to be switched off. $1,000 went in. $3,900 came out. 15 hours, and I slept through most of it. One of the agents it hired is not allowed to trade at all. That one is the reason the rest are still alive. Every prompt and the whole build is in the post below ↓ Save it. The wiring is the whole trick, and it reads in four minutes.

cvxv666

20,764 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

BlackRock runs on 20,000 people. Elon's Grok Bot runs the same shape for $300 a month, and it hires its own staff. You do not get an assistant. You get a company that hires. It does not throw ten agents at your problem and hand you the pile. It makes one agent that makes 10, and those ten make a 100. > LAYER ONE is one agent, the chief of staff, and it never touches the market > LAYER TWO is six desk heads, one job each, every one on its own computer with its own logins > LAYER THREE is whatever those six decide they need, spun up on the spot and shut down when the work is done Nobody writes a task list. You hand out job titles and the org fills itself in underneath. The swarm is never the same twice. Agents get spun up for one job, finish it, and are gone before I ever read their names. Not one of them sees the whole picture. The answer only exists after they hand off to each other. Wall Street cannot copy that. You cannot hire a hundred people for eleven minutes. BlackRock holds that shape together with a risk system called Aladdin. Mine holds it together with one agent that is only allowed to say no. I gave it $1,000 and told it to grow the money or get deleted. 15 hours later it was holding $3,900, on an address anyone can open and read. I was asleep for most of it, and I have still not written a line of code. The whole thing runs with my laptop shut, because none of it lives on my laptop. Setup is one evening. Create the chief, hand out the titles, run one trade on your screen while they watch, connect Telegram. Ten years ago a machine this shape had its name on a tower. Mine has a name I typed into a box. Save this while the whole thing still fits on one screen.
0:45

BlackRock runs on 20,000 people. Elon's Grok Bot runs the same shape for $300 a month, and it hires its own staff. You do not get an assistant. You get a company that hires. It does not throw ten agents at your problem and hand you the pile. It makes one agent that makes 10, and those ten make a 100. > LAYER ONE is one agent, the chief of staff, and it never touches the market > LAYER TWO is six desk heads, one job each, every one on its own computer with its own logins > LAYER THREE is whatever those six decide they need, spun up on the spot and shut down when the work is done Nobody writes a task list. You hand out job titles and the org fills itself in underneath. The swarm is never the same twice. Agents get spun up for one job, finish it, and are gone before I ever read their names. Not one of them sees the whole picture. The answer only exists after they hand off to each other. Wall Street cannot copy that. You cannot hire a hundred people for eleven minutes. BlackRock holds that shape together with a risk system called Aladdin. Mine holds it together with one agent that is only allowed to say no. I gave it $1,000 and told it to grow the money or get deleted. 15 hours later it was holding $3,900, on an address anyone can open and read. I was asleep for most of it, and I have still not written a line of code. The whole thing runs with my laptop shut, because none of it lives on my laptop. Setup is one evening. Create the chief, hand out the titles, run one trade on your screen while they watch, connect Telegram. Ten years ago a machine this shape had its name on a tower. Mine has a name I typed into a box. Save this while the whole thing still fits on one screen.

cvxv666

45,488 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

SpaceXAI engineer (ex-Cursor): "I run 20+ GrokBot agents and I haven't written a prompt in months. They run on loops now I delegate the delegation - one Chief of Staff drives the other 20 and I only see what needs a decision" In a 29-min session she walks the whole shift: the loop, the roster, and where the human still sits this is worth more than 10 hours of paid courses watch it today, then read the full ruleset in the article below ↓
29:15

SpaceXAI engineer (ex-Cursor): "I run 20+ GrokBot agents and I haven't written a prompt in months. They run on loops now I delegate the delegation - one Chief of Staff drives the other 20 and I only see what needs a decision" In a 29-min session she walks the whole shift: the loop, the roster, and where the human still sits this is worth more than 10 hours of paid courses watch it today, then read the full ruleset in the article below ↓

Carnage

34,524 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

F**KING INSANE, GROK BOT IS TRYING TO FIND A TREATMENT FOR A DOG WITH A DISEASE THAT HAS NO CURE 6 agents, 1 patient, 0 candidates and 0 doses. milo is still at 1.4/10 mobility, but on day 2 the crew finally gets the structure it needs to start working chief → assigns charter → defines owns → defines stops → signs role → unlocks vote scout owns literature, chem owns molecule design, tox owns safety, vitals watches milo, scribe keeps evidence, and chief routes the whole case the important part is what happens before research starts. no agent can vote until its charter is signed, and every role gets a hard stopline showing exactly where it must stop by the end, 6/6 charters are active. still 0 candidates, still 0 doses, still 1.4/10 mobility. no treatment yet, but now the crew is finally allowed to search for one. bookmark this
0:49

F**KING INSANE, GROK BOT IS TRYING TO FIND A TREATMENT FOR A DOG WITH A DISEASE THAT HAS NO CURE 6 agents, 1 patient, 0 candidates and 0 doses. milo is still at 1.4/10 mobility, but on day 2 the crew finally gets the structure it needs to start working chief → assigns charter → defines owns → defines stops → signs role → unlocks vote scout owns literature, chem owns molecule design, tox owns safety, vitals watches milo, scribe keeps evidence, and chief routes the whole case the important part is what happens before research starts. no agent can vote until its charter is signed, and every role gets a hard stopline showing exactly where it must stop by the end, 6/6 charters are active. still 0 candidates, still 0 doses, still 1.4/10 mobility. no treatment yet, but now the crew is finally allowed to search for one. bookmark this

Gipp 🦅

131,585 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen