Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

THIS is why when the third party culprits/McAlberts all testify with some elaborate & contrived story about how they all coincidentally & inexplicably didn’t see the body on the front lawn when leaving 34 Fairview, it completely strains credulity. Here’s a disinterested, non-McAlbert witness, Heather Maxon, who testifies like...

OliviaLambo_'s profile picture

Olivia

28,183 subscribers

74,151 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & WellnessNachrichten & PolitikBildung
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von SavageInviteDeadPool
SavageInviteDeadPoolvor 1 Jahr

What was the CW trying to accomplish with the endless "did you see anyone walk to the house" questions? She saw him in the SUV before they arrived. He was not in the SUV when they left. Does it really matter that she didn't see him walking? He didn't vaporize. He left the SUV.

Profilbild von Olivia
Oliviavor 1 Jahr

Exactly. Common sense.

Profilbild von The Daily Muck
The Daily Muckvor 1 Jahr

Read our next article in this ongoing investigation that shows how the government's seizure of this private property and arrest of its owner further exposes the eco-tyranny happening in California...

Profilbild von Steph 🏴‍☠️
Steph 🏴‍☠️vor 1 Jahr

He’s not in the car. Or walking on the lawn or laying on the lawn. Unless he’s hiding in the freakin bushes… he’s already in the house.

Profilbild von Kimberly Templeton
Kimberly Templetonvor 1 Jahr

They were very credible in my opinion. It’s crazy that every witness the CW calls ends up being better for the defense. Shows you just how ridiculous this whole thing is. It’s despicable and evil they would do this to another human being

Profilbild von Dizzy
Dizzyvor 1 Jahr

You always make the best points!

Profilbild von NattieJ
NattieJvor 1 Jahr

And she doesn’t pretend that she wasn’t intoxicated

Profilbild von Mike
Mikevor 1 Jahr

Yeah, but they didn't have the Peanut butter to strike up a memorable and lively conversation.

Profilbild von Son of the South
Son of the Southvor 1 Jahr

Not to mention the unbelievable amount of "Butt Dials" made, all from smart phones. I have never seen a smart phone butt dial.

Profilbild von tm
tmvor 1 Jahr

Notice Sarah now says the bread 🥖 was for the storm and not for Jenn’s easy lunch making.

Profilbild von Karen Groves
Karen Grovesvor 1 Jahr

Exactly, and when Matt, Jen and the girls backed out of the driveway and turned to go past the flagpole, at one point the headlights would have been pointing right at John, if he was there.

Ähnliche Videos

NEW: Brian Higgins apparently told investigators during his interview that the reason he couldn’t see John O’Keefe’s body on the front lawn when he was leaving 34 Fairview that night was because “he didn’t see a body because it was hidden by a snowbank.” There was hardly a dusting of snow on the ground when Brian Higgins left 34 Fairview. That’s a huge problem. #KarenRead #BrianHiggins #YuriBukhenik #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
0:34

NEW: Brian Higgins apparently told investigators during his interview that the reason he couldn’t see John O’Keefe’s body on the front lawn when he was leaving 34 Fairview that night was because “he didn’t see a body because it was hidden by a snowbank.” There was hardly a dusting of snow on the ground when Brian Higgins left 34 Fairview. That’s a huge problem. #KarenRead #BrianHiggins #YuriBukhenik #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

158,238 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“We did not take Michael Proctor’s word for that! And thank god we didn’t! Because, WE. LEARNED. THAT. WAS. A. LIE!” — Attorney David Yannetti If Karen Read were so guilty and thus Officer #JohnOKeefe’s body would’ve had to have been in front of 34 Fairview from 12:25am to 6:03am, during which snowplows would’ve passed by, then why did Lead Investigator Michael Proctor lie and say that Fairview Road had not been plowed during that time? (Because then he would have to reveal a witness—the snowplow driver—who could and would exculpate Karen Read). Why hide witnesses if you’re prosecuting the right person? If #KarenRead were guilty of striking and leaving Officer O’Keefe for dead in front of 34 Fairview, then why would she go out of her way to find out who was snowplowing Fairview Road that night, when that person could potentially incriminate her? If Karen Read were guilty, then why would Michael Proctor want to hide and lie about all of this evidence, and these witnesses, that could incriminate her? Why hide evidence when you’re prosecuting the right person? #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption
1:44

“We did not take Michael Proctor’s word for that! And thank god we didn’t! Because, WE. LEARNED. THAT. WAS. A. LIE!” — Attorney David Yannetti If Karen Read were so guilty and thus Officer #JohnOKeefe’s body would’ve had to have been in front of 34 Fairview from 12:25am to 6:03am, during which snowplows would’ve passed by, then why did Lead Investigator Michael Proctor lie and say that Fairview Road had not been plowed during that time? (Because then he would have to reveal a witness—the snowplow driver—who could and would exculpate Karen Read). Why hide witnesses if you’re prosecuting the right person? If #KarenRead were guilty of striking and leaving Officer O’Keefe for dead in front of 34 Fairview, then why would she go out of her way to find out who was snowplowing Fairview Road that night, when that person could potentially incriminate her? If Karen Read were guilty, then why would Michael Proctor want to hide and lie about all of this evidence, and these witnesses, that could incriminate her? Why hide evidence when you’re prosecuting the right person? #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

69,914 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The Commonwealth’s alleging that at 12:31/12:32am, #KarenRead’s vehicle struck and incapacitated John O’Keefe, causing his death. Ryan Nagel testified this morning to having arrived at 34 Fairview behind Karen Read, at around 12:30am, and was there for at minimum 5 minutes. This means that Ryan Nagel and the other two people with him, Richard D'Antuono and Heather Maxon, were all in front of 34 Fairview from 12:30am to at least 12:35am. None of them saw any vehicle pedestrian collision around 12:31/12:32am like the Commonwealth alleges. This is a huge hole in the DA’s case. Moreover, it highlights the importance and necessity of obtaining digital data and third party records as evidence, particularly in a case where the timeline is so tight. Had investigators or the DA’s Office done the proper thing, as seen in normal murder investigations, aka pulling cell phone data and records for all witnesses at the time—specifically those of Ryan Nagel’s, for instance, then we could have the exact, precise phone location data to see exactly when he arrived and left the scene that night—and we wouldn’t have to be relying on vague and imprecise memories. But, they deliberately avoided retrieving any such evidence and steadfastly opposed the defense’s attempts at accessing it. #RyanNagel #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
1:36

The Commonwealth’s alleging that at 12:31/12:32am, #KarenRead’s vehicle struck and incapacitated John O’Keefe, causing his death. Ryan Nagel testified this morning to having arrived at 34 Fairview behind Karen Read, at around 12:30am, and was there for at minimum 5 minutes. This means that Ryan Nagel and the other two people with him, Richard D'Antuono and Heather Maxon, were all in front of 34 Fairview from 12:30am to at least 12:35am. None of them saw any vehicle pedestrian collision around 12:31/12:32am like the Commonwealth alleges. This is a huge hole in the DA’s case. Moreover, it highlights the importance and necessity of obtaining digital data and third party records as evidence, particularly in a case where the timeline is so tight. Had investigators or the DA’s Office done the proper thing, as seen in normal murder investigations, aka pulling cell phone data and records for all witnesses at the time—specifically those of Ryan Nagel’s, for instance, then we could have the exact, precise phone location data to see exactly when he arrived and left the scene that night—and we wouldn’t have to be relying on vague and imprecise memories. But, they deliberately avoided retrieving any such evidence and steadfastly opposed the defense’s attempts at accessing it. #RyanNagel #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

47,802 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

When a witness says twice—they were at C.F. McCarthy’s to meet their sister, but we know their sister was actually at 34 Fairview, it raises a bigger question, Were some of these “harmless” details actually coached to fit a narrative? Small lies about times, places and people aren’t random they’re often meant to distance someone from a bigger truth. If these stories truly lined up, there would be no need to adjust the tiniest details. Were these witnesses simply mistaken… or were they all told the “safe” version to repeat?
0:34

When a witness says twice—they were at C.F. McCarthy’s to meet their sister, but we know their sister was actually at 34 Fairview, it raises a bigger question, Were some of these “harmless” details actually coached to fit a narrative? Small lies about times, places and people aren’t random they’re often meant to distance someone from a bigger truth. If these stories truly lined up, there would be no need to adjust the tiniest details. Were these witnesses simply mistaken… or were they all told the “safe” version to repeat?

Dixie Normus

35,339 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

#KarenReadRetrial Here are two videos of Aidan Kearney threatening Lucky Loughran, the plow truck driver who testified in the Read trial this morning. What the defense needed from this witness is for him to say he saw no body on the lawn of 34 Fairview and that he saw a Ford Edge in front of Fairview. These were two key aspects Kearney used to push the defense cOnSpIrAcY propaganda. Lucky denied the videos were threats under oath.
1:30

#KarenReadRetrial Here are two videos of Aidan Kearney threatening Lucky Loughran, the plow truck driver who testified in the Read trial this morning. What the defense needed from this witness is for him to say he saw no body on the lawn of 34 Fairview and that he saw a Ford Edge in front of Fairview. These were two key aspects Kearney used to push the defense cOnSpIrAcY propaganda. Lucky denied the videos were threats under oath.

Julie Carpenter

43,648 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Can you even imagine how many more lies these “witnesses” would be telling if they didn’t know about the Feds being involved? The only reason any of the McAlberts, or the Commonwealth, ever conceded any of the truth in this case was due to the threat of potential federal perjury charges. #KarenRead #JenMcCabe #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
1:01

Can you even imagine how many more lies these “witnesses” would be telling if they didn’t know about the Feds being involved? The only reason any of the McAlberts, or the Commonwealth, ever conceded any of the truth in this case was due to the threat of potential federal perjury charges. #KarenRead #JenMcCabe #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

63,922 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Why is this Judge YET AGAIN improperly and inappropriately interjecting herself to protect witnesses like Jen McCabe—witnesses who lied to the FBI, no less!? Here she literally answers for the witness! This is so inappropriate and disgusting to see how eager she is to protect obviously deceitful witnesses and keep the truth from the jury. Judge Beverly Cannone is so completely out of line. She apparently doesn’t care about judicial erring all over the place! #KarenRead #JenMcCabe #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
0:36

Why is this Judge YET AGAIN improperly and inappropriately interjecting herself to protect witnesses like Jen McCabe—witnesses who lied to the FBI, no less!? Here she literally answers for the witness! This is so inappropriate and disgusting to see how eager she is to protect obviously deceitful witnesses and keep the truth from the jury. Judge Beverly Cannone is so completely out of line. She apparently doesn’t care about judicial erring all over the place! #KarenRead #JenMcCabe #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

88,661 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The 7am family meeting at 34 Fairview is where they decided to put the blame on Karen Read for the murder of John O'Keefe. This is why Lank was called back. Their original story had holes and could easily be questioned. Karen had a broken taillight. She was the easiest target.
0:24

The 7am family meeting at 34 Fairview is where they decided to put the blame on Karen Read for the murder of John O'Keefe. This is why Lank was called back. Their original story had holes and could easily be questioned. Karen had a broken taillight. She was the easiest target.

BoozeyBeauty

32,453 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

On October 3, 2022, the defense for #KarenRead vigorously argued its Rule 17 Motion (filed September 16, 2022) addressing the fact that none of the several witnesses who left 34 Fairview saw the dead body on the front lawn. Surely, if there were any possible witnesses who could’ve seen Officer #JohnOKeefe’s body there—in the investigation of the murder of a fellow Police Officer—investigators would’ve interviewed them promptly, right? Certainly, if someone possessed such critical information, honest homicide detectives would want to know it, right? This would be pertinent information in a murder investigation, right? Presumably, they wouldn’t wait until over 8 months to speak with such an individual—whose existence they were aware of on day 1, since January 29, 2022, right? WRONG! Enter: Julie Nagel. Is it convenient or just a coincidence that only AFTER the defense argued this Rule 17 Motion—requesting cell records of all the individuals who were present at the Albert residence on the night in question—conflicted Lead Investigator Michael Proctor miraculously is able to produce a witness who would say she “observed a dark object in the white snow by the flagpole”? In fact, it was just 2 days later (on October 5, 2022) that Proctor for the first time interviewed this individual, Julie Nagel, despite being aware of her identity/presence at 34 Fairview since January 29, 2022. Seems awfully convenient, doesn’t it? When looking at the procedural history of the #KarenRead case, it becomes clear that much of the Commonwealth’s (CW) actual case was reactionary—contrived in response to the actual factual basis of events brought forth & slowly trickled out by the defense. This seems to be, in large part, reflected in their trial strategy. We’re three weeks into trial & have seen little, if any, case or evidence whatsoever regarding how the defendant, Karen Read, was supposedly on the “outs” with her boyfriend, had a toxic, tumultuous relationship, was intoxicated, was fighting so badly with her boyfriend that she wanted to murder him, or how she supposedly murdered him with her taillight. The defense points out the obvious problems with the CW’s case—like the fact that a body not being on the front lawn from approximately 12:30am onward, means Karen Read did not kill Officer O’Keefe—and days/weeks later, the CW gets a witness to say they saw a blob on the lawn to assuage the Court. …Because the last thing they want is to have to turn over Brian Albert or Colin Albert’s cellphone data to the defense, pursuant to their Rule 17 filing. But, there’s a few problems with the credulity of Julie Nagel’s claims: 1) She self-admittedly was drunk 2) She wasn’t interviewed until at least eight months after the fact 3) She’s close enough to Jen McCabe to have: provided child- and dog-care for her, been to her house, and had a nickname for her—a fact that Nagel was hardly forthcoming about But, we’re supposed to believe that this witness, who was drunk at the time, had such astute recall, of a mere flash in time over 8 months ago, to remember seeing—over Sara Levinson’s shoulder (from the opposite side of the car) out the window, while in a moving car—a black blob where Officer O’Keefe’s body was later found. And after months & months of having presumably heard the state’s story that Karen hit John, leaving his body in the front lawn before Nagel would’ve left 34 Fairview. How accurate is one’s memory after 8 months anyway? How accurate is Nagel’s memory given she was intoxicated at the time? And how reliable is her testimony, as it’s presumably biased by her relationship with the McCabes? My question is: If Julie Nagel truly saw a black blob, where she would’ve been well aware Officer O’Keefe’s body was found as early as January 29, 2022—obviously critical information for investigators—why would she wait for them to come to her, over 8 months later, to share it? #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup
0:39

On October 3, 2022, the defense for #KarenRead vigorously argued its Rule 17 Motion (filed September 16, 2022) addressing the fact that none of the several witnesses who left 34 Fairview saw the dead body on the front lawn. Surely, if there were any possible witnesses who could’ve seen Officer #JohnOKeefe’s body there—in the investigation of the murder of a fellow Police Officer—investigators would’ve interviewed them promptly, right? Certainly, if someone possessed such critical information, honest homicide detectives would want to know it, right? This would be pertinent information in a murder investigation, right? Presumably, they wouldn’t wait until over 8 months to speak with such an individual—whose existence they were aware of on day 1, since January 29, 2022, right? WRONG! Enter: Julie Nagel. Is it convenient or just a coincidence that only AFTER the defense argued this Rule 17 Motion—requesting cell records of all the individuals who were present at the Albert residence on the night in question—conflicted Lead Investigator Michael Proctor miraculously is able to produce a witness who would say she “observed a dark object in the white snow by the flagpole”? In fact, it was just 2 days later (on October 5, 2022) that Proctor for the first time interviewed this individual, Julie Nagel, despite being aware of her identity/presence at 34 Fairview since January 29, 2022. Seems awfully convenient, doesn’t it? When looking at the procedural history of the #KarenRead case, it becomes clear that much of the Commonwealth’s (CW) actual case was reactionary—contrived in response to the actual factual basis of events brought forth & slowly trickled out by the defense. This seems to be, in large part, reflected in their trial strategy. We’re three weeks into trial & have seen little, if any, case or evidence whatsoever regarding how the defendant, Karen Read, was supposedly on the “outs” with her boyfriend, had a toxic, tumultuous relationship, was intoxicated, was fighting so badly with her boyfriend that she wanted to murder him, or how she supposedly murdered him with her taillight. The defense points out the obvious problems with the CW’s case—like the fact that a body not being on the front lawn from approximately 12:30am onward, means Karen Read did not kill Officer O’Keefe—and days/weeks later, the CW gets a witness to say they saw a blob on the lawn to assuage the Court. …Because the last thing they want is to have to turn over Brian Albert or Colin Albert’s cellphone data to the defense, pursuant to their Rule 17 filing. But, there’s a few problems with the credulity of Julie Nagel’s claims: 1) She self-admittedly was drunk 2) She wasn’t interviewed until at least eight months after the fact 3) She’s close enough to Jen McCabe to have: provided child- and dog-care for her, been to her house, and had a nickname for her—a fact that Nagel was hardly forthcoming about But, we’re supposed to believe that this witness, who was drunk at the time, had such astute recall, of a mere flash in time over 8 months ago, to remember seeing—over Sara Levinson’s shoulder (from the opposite side of the car) out the window, while in a moving car—a black blob where Officer O’Keefe’s body was later found. And after months & months of having presumably heard the state’s story that Karen hit John, leaving his body in the front lawn before Nagel would’ve left 34 Fairview. How accurate is one’s memory after 8 months anyway? How accurate is Nagel’s memory given she was intoxicated at the time? And how reliable is her testimony, as it’s presumably biased by her relationship with the McCabes? My question is: If Julie Nagel truly saw a black blob, where she would’ve been well aware Officer O’Keefe’s body was found as early as January 29, 2022—obviously critical information for investigators—why would she wait for them to come to her, over 8 months later, to share it? #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup

Olivia

127,152 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

BREAKING: Jen McCabe called her sister, Nicole Albert, at 34 Fairview at 5:07am the morning of January 29, 2022, and spoke with her for 38 seconds nearly 1 hour BEFORE Officer John O’Keefe’s body was found dying in the cold on Nicole Albert’s front yard! Then Jen McCabe proceeded to delay and divert #KarenRead for as long as possible from finding John O’Keefe or going to 34 Fairview Road. Why? Because “hos long to die in cold”. #JenMcCabe #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
0:58

BREAKING: Jen McCabe called her sister, Nicole Albert, at 34 Fairview at 5:07am the morning of January 29, 2022, and spoke with her for 38 seconds nearly 1 hour BEFORE Officer John O’Keefe’s body was found dying in the cold on Nicole Albert’s front yard! Then Jen McCabe proceeded to delay and divert #KarenRead for as long as possible from finding John O’Keefe or going to 34 Fairview Road. Why? Because “hos long to die in cold”. #JenMcCabe #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

185,353 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The evolving story of Karen Read arriving at 34 Fairview. What do you notice about this?
1:06

The evolving story of Karen Read arriving at 34 Fairview. What do you notice about this?

John DePetro Show

19,560 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

#KarenReadRetrial On cross examination, after testifying that he could see all the way up to the front door of 34 Fairview and he that he saw nothing near the flagpole, Lucky Loughran was asked if he remembered seeing any dumpsters in front of any houses while plowing. Lucky said he did not. Later, he was shown video that clearly showed a large red dumpster in the driveway across from 34 Fairview. A body is far smaller than a dumpster and that will be seared into the juror's memories when weighing Lucky's testimony.
0:27

#KarenReadRetrial On cross examination, after testifying that he could see all the way up to the front door of 34 Fairview and he that he saw nothing near the flagpole, Lucky Loughran was asked if he remembered seeing any dumpsters in front of any houses while plowing. Lucky said he did not. Later, he was shown video that clearly showed a large red dumpster in the driveway across from 34 Fairview. A body is far smaller than a dumpster and that will be seared into the juror's memories when weighing Lucky's testimony.

Julie Carpenter

20,342 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Kim Fair said she’s screenshotting every one of my posts, so Kim, screenshot this one nice and clear. I’ve been saying this all along, Allie, Colin, and Higgins are not three separate stories. Their timelines overlap. If Higgins’ Jeep was where they say it was, Allie should have seen it when she pulled in. Allie Could not tell MSP how Colin was at Fairview ummm well.... colin told us in court Allie drove him!!!!! Higgins should have seen Allie arrive. Colin should have seen Higgins’ Jeep when he came out. This was not some complicated maze. There are only so many ways to get to 34 Fairview. Yet Allie could not clearly remember the route she took to pick Colin up, and now the filing says Life360 data from Jennifer McCabe’s phone showed Allie did not travel straight home after dropping Colin off and even more importantly, showed no evidence of Allie arriving at or departing from 34 Fairview or Colin’s house on January 29. So once again, the “simple explanation” is not simple at all. If Colin left the house exactly how they said he did, why does the data make the story messier instead of clearer? If Allie picked him up at 34 Fairview, why does the record not cleanly show that? If Higgins’ Jeep was there, why does nobody’s testimony cleanly account for who saw who? A normal pickup does not need this much explaining. Screenshot that.
3:34

Kim Fair said she’s screenshotting every one of my posts, so Kim, screenshot this one nice and clear. I’ve been saying this all along, Allie, Colin, and Higgins are not three separate stories. Their timelines overlap. If Higgins’ Jeep was where they say it was, Allie should have seen it when she pulled in. Allie Could not tell MSP how Colin was at Fairview ummm well.... colin told us in court Allie drove him!!!!! Higgins should have seen Allie arrive. Colin should have seen Higgins’ Jeep when he came out. This was not some complicated maze. There are only so many ways to get to 34 Fairview. Yet Allie could not clearly remember the route she took to pick Colin up, and now the filing says Life360 data from Jennifer McCabe’s phone showed Allie did not travel straight home after dropping Colin off and even more importantly, showed no evidence of Allie arriving at or departing from 34 Fairview or Colin’s house on January 29. So once again, the “simple explanation” is not simple at all. If Colin left the house exactly how they said he did, why does the data make the story messier instead of clearer? If Allie picked him up at 34 Fairview, why does the record not cleanly show that? If Higgins’ Jeep was there, why does nobody’s testimony cleanly account for who saw who? A normal pickup does not need this much explaining. Screenshot that.

Dixie Normus

54,840 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

Did you know our soldiers have to return all their gear when they leave the military? For some reason I always thought they got to keep most if not all of it. Why do we do that when they earned the right to keep it? If everyone gets new when they enlisted, makes you wonder where all the used stuff goes.🤔
0:54

Did you know our soldiers have to return all their gear when they leave the military? For some reason I always thought they got to keep most if not all of it. Why do we do that when they earned the right to keep it? If everyone gets new when they enlisted, makes you wonder where all the used stuff goes.🤔

Bobbi

95,177 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

Seeing Lt. Mike Lank at the Canton High hockey game reminded me of one of those little details from the Karen Read trial that somehow never gets less strange the more you look at it. Jennifer McCabe testified that on the morning of January 30th she left 1 Meadows, drove to Mike Lank’s house on Oakdale, and only went past 34 Fairview because that’s the normal way to get there. And to be fair, from 1 Meadows to Oakdale, yes… you could pass Fairview depending on the route. No problem there. Except for one small issue. Her Life360 data shows she didn’t go straight from 1 Meadows to Lank’s. It shows she went from 1 Meadows to Country Lane (her house) then she left her house and drove past 34 Fairview, then to Oakdale (Lank’s) Once you go to Country Lane first, driving past Fairview is no longer the natural route to Oakdale. Not even close. You would have to go out of your way to go by 34 Fairview. But in court, the explanation was simple…“We drove by Fairview because that’s the way we go to Lank’s.” Right. That works… only if you ignore the part where the phone data shows you went home first. Just one of those little coincidences in this case where the phones keep telling one story…and the witnesses keep telling another. But sure. Totally normal morning. Nothing to see here.
2:20

Seeing Lt. Mike Lank at the Canton High hockey game reminded me of one of those little details from the Karen Read trial that somehow never gets less strange the more you look at it. Jennifer McCabe testified that on the morning of January 30th she left 1 Meadows, drove to Mike Lank’s house on Oakdale, and only went past 34 Fairview because that’s the normal way to get there. And to be fair, from 1 Meadows to Oakdale, yes… you could pass Fairview depending on the route. No problem there. Except for one small issue. Her Life360 data shows she didn’t go straight from 1 Meadows to Lank’s. It shows she went from 1 Meadows to Country Lane (her house) then she left her house and drove past 34 Fairview, then to Oakdale (Lank’s) Once you go to Country Lane first, driving past Fairview is no longer the natural route to Oakdale. Not even close. You would have to go out of your way to go by 34 Fairview. But in court, the explanation was simple…“We drove by Fairview because that’s the way we go to Lank’s.” Right. That works… only if you ignore the part where the phone data shows you went home first. Just one of those little coincidences in this case where the phones keep telling one story…and the witnesses keep telling another. But sure. Totally normal morning. Nothing to see here.

Dixie Normus

24,482 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This is the scene right after a 15-year old was shot so for all these leftists who are going on about how these were kids enjoying the good weather. At some point the majority of Chicagoans need to be asking why we accept this behavior.
0:30

This is the scene right after a 15-year old was shot so for all these leftists who are going on about how these were kids enjoying the good weather. At some point the majority of Chicagoans need to be asking why we accept this behavior.

Libs Of Chicago

18,484 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This kid is crying because ICE will deport him someday, but I have some questions. These people have been living in the USA for a couple of years. Why didn’t They legally registered their documents; why didn’t they come here in a legal manner? If they’re scared this much, why don’t they obey the laws of the USA? President Trump is doing to save America and make it great again, and that’s only possible when all the illegals return to their home country.
2:50

This kid is crying because ICE will deport him someday, but I have some questions. These people have been living in the USA for a couple of years. Why didn’t They legally registered their documents; why didn’t they come here in a legal manner? If they’re scared this much, why don’t they obey the laws of the USA? President Trump is doing to save America and make it great again, and that’s only possible when all the illegals return to their home country.

GABRIEL 🪽

11,591 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Why are they doing all this on the highway? And recording and posting it for the whole world to see? What would their parents feel like when they see it?
0:36

Why are they doing all this on the highway? And recording and posting it for the whole world to see? What would their parents feel like when they see it?

︎ ︎venom

4,323,066 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING: Commonwealth expert, Ian Whiffin, just confirmed that the GPS/location data from the phone of John O’Keefe shows that he could have been inside the house at 34 Fairview. Right now on cross examination of Ian Whiffin, #KarenRead defense Attorney Alessi gets Whiffin to admit that he did not include the GPS/location data showing John O’Keefe’s phone overlapping with a substantial portion of the house at 34 Fairview, thus establishing that he very much in fact could have been inside the house, despite the Commonwealth’s claims to the contrary. John O’Keefe’s Apple Health data showing him climbing flights of stairs after his arrival at 34 Fairview further corroborate that he got outside of the car at the house he drove to to go to an after party, and unsurprisingly entered that house as planned. Shocker! #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
0:41

BREAKING: Commonwealth expert, Ian Whiffin, just confirmed that the GPS/location data from the phone of John O’Keefe shows that he could have been inside the house at 34 Fairview. Right now on cross examination of Ian Whiffin, #KarenRead defense Attorney Alessi gets Whiffin to admit that he did not include the GPS/location data showing John O’Keefe’s phone overlapping with a substantial portion of the house at 34 Fairview, thus establishing that he very much in fact could have been inside the house, despite the Commonwealth’s claims to the contrary. John O’Keefe’s Apple Health data showing him climbing flights of stairs after his arrival at 34 Fairview further corroborate that he got outside of the car at the house he drove to to go to an after party, and unsurprisingly entered that house as planned. Shocker! #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

150,170 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr