Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

“We did not take Michael Proctor’s word for that! And thank god we didn’t! Because, WE. LEARNED. THAT. WAS. A. LIE!” — Attorney David Yannetti If Karen Read were so guilty and thus Officer #JohnOKeefe’s body would’ve had to have been in front of 34 Fairview from 12:25am to...

OliviaLambo_'s profile picture

Olivia

28,291 subscribers

69,914 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

#JohnOKeefe
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Why is Michael Proctor still employed by the Massachusetts State Police? Why is his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, commenting on an open investigation he’s involved in and heavily conflicted on? Why does Elizabeth Proctor—someone who doesn’t, nor did she ever, know #KarenRead have such illogical animus toward her when it was her own husband whose conduct was reprehensible & created all of the problems in this case? Yet she “fully supports” her husband? 😂 Why does Elizabeth Proctor clearly appear to have a personal stake in the outcome of this case, or Karen Read being found guilty when she says “Karen Read is a murderer”? It’s no wonder Michael Proctor felt so comfortable to say and do such immoral and unethical things in this case. His own wife emboldens him! Have these people no shame? It is because of Michael Proctor and HIS actions that Officer #JohnOKeefe will never get proper justice, but apparently Michael and Elizabeth Proctor are the victims. QUESTION: Do you feel safer knowing Michael Proctor is a State Police Officer? #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption
0:55

Why is Michael Proctor still employed by the Massachusetts State Police? Why is his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, commenting on an open investigation he’s involved in and heavily conflicted on? Why does Elizabeth Proctor—someone who doesn’t, nor did she ever, know #KarenRead have such illogical animus toward her when it was her own husband whose conduct was reprehensible & created all of the problems in this case? Yet she “fully supports” her husband? 😂 Why does Elizabeth Proctor clearly appear to have a personal stake in the outcome of this case, or Karen Read being found guilty when she says “Karen Read is a murderer”? It’s no wonder Michael Proctor felt so comfortable to say and do such immoral and unethical things in this case. His own wife emboldens him! Have these people no shame? It is because of Michael Proctor and HIS actions that Officer #JohnOKeefe will never get proper justice, but apparently Michael and Elizabeth Proctor are the victims. QUESTION: Do you feel safer knowing Michael Proctor is a State Police Officer? #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

160,413 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

If Lead Investigator Michael Proctor is depraved enough to unlawfully search #KarenRead’s cellphone for nude photographs of her on January 29, 2022, then what’s not to say he wouldn’t delete the Ring cam videos that subsequently went missing, too? FACT: Both the videos in the Ring cam system & the photographs on Karen Read’s cellphone were accessed unlawfully, without search warrants, by Michael Proctor. Proctor also hid his conflict, failed to recuse himself & then lied for the next 2 years, steadfastly defending the falsehood that he wasn’t lifelong family friends with the Albert’s & McCabe’s. We now know that was a lie. But here’s the thing: Karen immediately turned over her cellphone to Trooper Proctor. So if there’s evidence that Ring cam videos were deleted from her cellphone after Michael Proctor seized it, then it’d be pretty damning proof that he deleted the videos. —————— How did Proctor access Karen Read’s cellphone so quickly, on day 1, when he was searching it for nude photos of her? Fully cooperative & eager to help in the investigation, Karen Read promptly accessed her cellphone in front of investigators to provide them with the contact info of everyone who was present the night before with her & John. Notably, Karen Read voluntarily turned her cellphone over to investigators, without a search warrant, when she was FIRST able to speak with them. These are the actions of an honest & forthcoming witness. Not a murderer. —————— The Commonwealth tells on itself, revealing just how Proctor accessed her cellphone without a search warrant (below) in its own filings: “The troopers further asked the defendant for contact information relating to the people she had indicated were present at the bars. The defendant obliged, and prior to providing said information, the troopers observed the defendant to enter a numerical passcode into her phone to unlock it, prior to retrieving said data.” —————— If Proctor preyed upon Karen Read’s trust by secretly watching her enter her passcode to unlock her cellphone, and remembering it for later so he could go through her phone, without a search warrant, looking for nude photos & other things unrelated to the investigation, then we already know he’s perfectly willing to unlawfully access things on her cellphone for nefarious purposes. If Karen had the Ring app on her cellphone, what’s not to say Proctor didn’t access it to delete videos? Ask yourself this: If Karen Read were guilty, would she be asking for Ring data & videos that’d incriminate her? If Trooper Proctor didn’t unlawfully access the Ring app from either John or Karen’s phones to delete videos, then why would he contact & ask Ring wanting to know how long until their stored user data & videos are deleted from their servers for LE? Which is exactly what Proctor did on February 10, 2022, just days after arresting Karen Read, when he contacted them in an email from subpoenas@ring.com stating that the Ring videos had been deleted from DropBox after 90 days. If Proctor’s theory was that Karen struck & killed John with her taillight, breaking it into 45 pieces left at the scene, wouldn’t he be immediately filing a search warrant for those Ring videos to show that proof? If Proctor had unlawfully deleted those Ring videos himself though, he’d probably want to know how long until they’d be gone from Ring’s servers—evidence of HIS consciousness of guilt—so he could run out the clock so that they’re unable to be obtained, even when he does ultimately file a search warrant. Might that explain why he lied, purporting to have had a search warrant when he didn’t, knowing that the defense would’ve immediately filed an emergency motion to preserve that evidence? They ran out the clock & even lied to the defense so that there was no possible way for them to intervene before the evidence was fully destroyed & irretrievable. #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption
1:39

If Lead Investigator Michael Proctor is depraved enough to unlawfully search #KarenRead’s cellphone for nude photographs of her on January 29, 2022, then what’s not to say he wouldn’t delete the Ring cam videos that subsequently went missing, too? FACT: Both the videos in the Ring cam system & the photographs on Karen Read’s cellphone were accessed unlawfully, without search warrants, by Michael Proctor. Proctor also hid his conflict, failed to recuse himself & then lied for the next 2 years, steadfastly defending the falsehood that he wasn’t lifelong family friends with the Albert’s & McCabe’s. We now know that was a lie. But here’s the thing: Karen immediately turned over her cellphone to Trooper Proctor. So if there’s evidence that Ring cam videos were deleted from her cellphone after Michael Proctor seized it, then it’d be pretty damning proof that he deleted the videos. —————— How did Proctor access Karen Read’s cellphone so quickly, on day 1, when he was searching it for nude photos of her? Fully cooperative & eager to help in the investigation, Karen Read promptly accessed her cellphone in front of investigators to provide them with the contact info of everyone who was present the night before with her & John. Notably, Karen Read voluntarily turned her cellphone over to investigators, without a search warrant, when she was FIRST able to speak with them. These are the actions of an honest & forthcoming witness. Not a murderer. —————— The Commonwealth tells on itself, revealing just how Proctor accessed her cellphone without a search warrant (below) in its own filings: “The troopers further asked the defendant for contact information relating to the people she had indicated were present at the bars. The defendant obliged, and prior to providing said information, the troopers observed the defendant to enter a numerical passcode into her phone to unlock it, prior to retrieving said data.” —————— If Proctor preyed upon Karen Read’s trust by secretly watching her enter her passcode to unlock her cellphone, and remembering it for later so he could go through her phone, without a search warrant, looking for nude photos & other things unrelated to the investigation, then we already know he’s perfectly willing to unlawfully access things on her cellphone for nefarious purposes. If Karen had the Ring app on her cellphone, what’s not to say Proctor didn’t access it to delete videos? Ask yourself this: If Karen Read were guilty, would she be asking for Ring data & videos that’d incriminate her? If Trooper Proctor didn’t unlawfully access the Ring app from either John or Karen’s phones to delete videos, then why would he contact & ask Ring wanting to know how long until their stored user data & videos are deleted from their servers for LE? Which is exactly what Proctor did on February 10, 2022, just days after arresting Karen Read, when he contacted them in an email from [email protected] stating that the Ring videos had been deleted from DropBox after 90 days. If Proctor’s theory was that Karen struck & killed John with her taillight, breaking it into 45 pieces left at the scene, wouldn’t he be immediately filing a search warrant for those Ring videos to show that proof? If Proctor had unlawfully deleted those Ring videos himself though, he’d probably want to know how long until they’d be gone from Ring’s servers—evidence of HIS consciousness of guilt—so he could run out the clock so that they’re unable to be obtained, even when he does ultimately file a search warrant. Might that explain why he lied, purporting to have had a search warrant when he didn’t, knowing that the defense would’ve immediately filed an emergency motion to preserve that evidence? They ran out the clock & even lied to the defense so that there was no possible way for them to intervene before the evidence was fully destroyed & irretrievable. #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

153,132 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

THIS is why when the third party culprits/McAlberts all testify with some elaborate & contrived story about how they all coincidentally & inexplicably didn’t see the body on the front lawn when leaving 34 Fairview, it completely strains credulity. Here’s a disinterested, non-McAlbert witness, Heather Maxon, who testifies like a normal human being observant of their surroundings. Between Maxon, Ryan Nagel and Richard D’Antuano, these three witnesses all were observant of things on the front lawn and to the right of the roadway as they drove past it when leaving 34 Fairview. Notice how none of these witnesses provide some ridiculous story to explain why they were looking anywhere BUT where John’s body would later be found? Why did all of the witnesses that left 34 Fairview AFTER this point have some elaborate story for why they weren’t looking somewhere, but for consciousness of guilt? #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
0:41

THIS is why when the third party culprits/McAlberts all testify with some elaborate & contrived story about how they all coincidentally & inexplicably didn’t see the body on the front lawn when leaving 34 Fairview, it completely strains credulity. Here’s a disinterested, non-McAlbert witness, Heather Maxon, who testifies like a normal human being observant of their surroundings. Between Maxon, Ryan Nagel and Richard D’Antuano, these three witnesses all were observant of things on the front lawn and to the right of the roadway as they drove past it when leaving 34 Fairview. Notice how none of these witnesses provide some ridiculous story to explain why they were looking anywhere BUT where John’s body would later be found? Why did all of the witnesses that left 34 Fairview AFTER this point have some elaborate story for why they weren’t looking somewhere, but for consciousness of guilt? #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

74,151 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

WOW. JUST WOW. Michael Proctor is confronted with his text messages from August of 2022 where a photo of #KarenRead’s Attorney David Yannetti was sent & he replies “I truly hate him”. In a jaw dropping moment Attorney Alan Jackson asks Proctor: “How do you feel about him (Attorney Yannetti) now? He’s sitting right there” Shockingly, Proctor responds: “I still don’t care for him now!” ——————— Wow. What a classy, unbiased professional. Look at the absolute “shock and horrah” on everyone’s faces upon hearing such a response! What a total piece of human garbage. If this wasn’t a coverup, then why did Michael Proctor clearly have such vitriol and emotional disdain for some Attorney of a defendant he didn’t know, in an investigation with other people he supposedly didn’t know? Oh wait, we now know that was a lie and this “unbiased” Lead Investigator was anything but! Question: Why would a Lead Investigator on a homicide have such disdain for the legal counsel a defendant hires, if he doesn’t have a personal stake in the outcome like he would if he were covering up a murder for his friends and framing an innocent woman so that THEY, his “second family” don’t go down? Did he have such disdain for Attorney David Yannetti because he is one of the top criminal defense attorneys in the country, and Proctor became scared knowing his sloppy coverup was more likely to become exposed with the better the Attorneys Karen Read retained? And that angered him because he just wanted her to keel over and submit—be their scapegoat goddamn*t! Well Michael Proctor, welcome to hell! Because Attorneys Alan Jackson, David Yannetti and Elizabeth Little—WE AIN’T GOT NO QUIT! #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption #MichaelProctor #MassachusettsStatePolice
0:31

WOW. JUST WOW. Michael Proctor is confronted with his text messages from August of 2022 where a photo of #KarenRead’s Attorney David Yannetti was sent & he replies “I truly hate him”. In a jaw dropping moment Attorney Alan Jackson asks Proctor: “How do you feel about him (Attorney Yannetti) now? He’s sitting right there” Shockingly, Proctor responds: “I still don’t care for him now!” ——————— Wow. What a classy, unbiased professional. Look at the absolute “shock and horrah” on everyone’s faces upon hearing such a response! What a total piece of human garbage. If this wasn’t a coverup, then why did Michael Proctor clearly have such vitriol and emotional disdain for some Attorney of a defendant he didn’t know, in an investigation with other people he supposedly didn’t know? Oh wait, we now know that was a lie and this “unbiased” Lead Investigator was anything but! Question: Why would a Lead Investigator on a homicide have such disdain for the legal counsel a defendant hires, if he doesn’t have a personal stake in the outcome like he would if he were covering up a murder for his friends and framing an innocent woman so that THEY, his “second family” don’t go down? Did he have such disdain for Attorney David Yannetti because he is one of the top criminal defense attorneys in the country, and Proctor became scared knowing his sloppy coverup was more likely to become exposed with the better the Attorneys Karen Read retained? And that angered him because he just wanted her to keel over and submit—be their scapegoat goddamn*t! Well Michael Proctor, welcome to hell! Because Attorneys Alan Jackson, David Yannetti and Elizabeth Little—WE AIN’T GOT NO QUIT! #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption #MichaelProctor #MassachusettsStatePolice

Olivia

479,831 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

CAUGHT IN A LIE: Tough sell for the Commonwealth, whose only evidence regarding if Officer #JohnOKeefe’s body was possibly on Brian Albert’s front lawn when it would’ve needed to be there for #KarenRead to even potentially be culpable—“evidence” that was problematic and unreliable at best—comes from a witness whose credibility quickly disintegrated on the witness stand today. Information the prosecution notably avoided eliciting on direct examination of Julie Nagel—as if they’re hiding something—that could speak to her bias, was assuredly brought out by the defense on cross. That information was regarding if Julie Nagel knew the McCabe’s, had ever been to the McCabe’s house, and what the extent of her relationship with the McCabe’s was. When asked if she’d ever been to the McCabe’s house, what possible reason could Julie Nagle have to lie if she wasn’t hiding something? Well, as it turns out, she lied about this despite not only having been to the McCabe’s house, but also having provided childcare and dog-care for them. She was on a nickname-basis with Jen McCabe. Yet lies about knowing her? Why? Why lie about that? That’s a “no-stakes” question. If a witness would lie about something like that, what wouldn’t they lie about? Falsus in uno, Falsus in omnibus. ————— Video clip courtesy of: “The Alternate Corner” YouTube channel by Dylan streaming with Sean McDonough, NOT the other guy! #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption
0:50

CAUGHT IN A LIE: Tough sell for the Commonwealth, whose only evidence regarding if Officer #JohnOKeefe’s body was possibly on Brian Albert’s front lawn when it would’ve needed to be there for #KarenRead to even potentially be culpable—“evidence” that was problematic and unreliable at best—comes from a witness whose credibility quickly disintegrated on the witness stand today. Information the prosecution notably avoided eliciting on direct examination of Julie Nagel—as if they’re hiding something—that could speak to her bias, was assuredly brought out by the defense on cross. That information was regarding if Julie Nagel knew the McCabe’s, had ever been to the McCabe’s house, and what the extent of her relationship with the McCabe’s was. When asked if she’d ever been to the McCabe’s house, what possible reason could Julie Nagle have to lie if she wasn’t hiding something? Well, as it turns out, she lied about this despite not only having been to the McCabe’s house, but also having provided childcare and dog-care for them. She was on a nickname-basis with Jen McCabe. Yet lies about knowing her? Why? Why lie about that? That’s a “no-stakes” question. If a witness would lie about something like that, what wouldn’t they lie about? Falsus in uno, Falsus in omnibus. ————— Video clip courtesy of: “The Alternate Corner” YouTube channel by Dylan streaming with Sean McDonough, NOT the other guy! #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

73,982 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

During Emily D. Baker ⚖️ 💜’s reading of Karen Read’s Motion to Compel, a significant allegation emerged. According to former MSP Trooper Michael Proctor’s own notes, he knew Colin Albert was inside 34 Fairview on the night Officer John O’Keefe was found dying on Brian Albert’s lawn on January 29, 2022. Yet Colin Albert was reportedly omitted from Proctor’s report and was not formally interviewed until approximately 18 months later. Think about that. A person Proctor allegedly knew was present inside the house was left out of his report and wasn’t questioned for a year and a half. If these allegations are accurate, they raise serious questions about the thoroughness and objectivity of the investigation. Why would someone known to be inside the house not be included in the report? Why the 18-month delay? Transparency matters. Accountability matters. And the public deserves answers. #KarenRead #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #Proctor #proctored
0:49

During Emily D. Baker ⚖️ 💜’s reading of Karen Read’s Motion to Compel, a significant allegation emerged. According to former MSP Trooper Michael Proctor’s own notes, he knew Colin Albert was inside 34 Fairview on the night Officer John O’Keefe was found dying on Brian Albert’s lawn on January 29, 2022. Yet Colin Albert was reportedly omitted from Proctor’s report and was not formally interviewed until approximately 18 months later. Think about that. A person Proctor allegedly knew was present inside the house was left out of his report and wasn’t questioned for a year and a half. If these allegations are accurate, they raise serious questions about the thoroughness and objectivity of the investigation. Why would someone known to be inside the house not be included in the report? Why the 18-month delay? Transparency matters. Accountability matters. And the public deserves answers. #KarenRead #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #Proctor #proctored

Kelly💚🌴

42,738 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

In the process of defending Colin Albert, Judge Cannone exonerated #KarenRead, and her own ruling proves Karen couldn’t have killed John O’Keefe. She claims Colin’s “screenshot” alibi removes his opportunity to have killed John. Well that means Karen connecting to the WiFi at 1 Meadows Ave at 12:36am also proves she couldn’t have killed John either, warranting dismissal of the charges. Specifically, Judge Beverly Cannone validated Colin Albert’s alibi, stating: “There is no evidence that [he] was at 34 Fairview when the defendant and Mr. O’Keefe arrived at the home.” “Evidence at the first trial was that Colin Albert had already been picked up by the time O’Keefe and the defendant arrived at 34 Fairview.” She’s apparently playing “fact finder” (the jury’s role) now to deny more constitutional rights of Karen Read’s, and preclude her from raising a third party culprit defense involving Colin Albert based on nothing more than some flimsy, unverifiable, metadata-stripped screenshots of alleged “text messages” as an alibi, provided 2 years after the fact by un-credible witnesses. Well, guess what Beverly? I’d say you just provided excellent grounds for a subsequent Motion to Dismiss, per the Commonwealth’s evidence proving the defendant’s alibi—that Karen Read was back home and connected to the WiFi at 1 Meadows Ave by 12:36am. Not only is this far more credible and reliable alibi evidence (data don’t lie) than a purported screenshot, but the Commonwealth’s own timeline and the evidentiary timeline make it physically impossible for Karen Read to have killed John O’Keefe—she was nowhere near John nor 34 Fairview during the time that he was killed, and thus categorically had no opportunity to do so. In Karen’s case, not only is the evidence of opportunity wholly inadequate, but digital forensic data evidence from both the WiFi system at 1 Meadows Ave and Karen Read’s cellphone unequivocally prove she did not and could not have killed John O’Keefe. Dismiss the case and lock this disgraceful, tyrannical Judge up! #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead
0:25

In the process of defending Colin Albert, Judge Cannone exonerated #KarenRead, and her own ruling proves Karen couldn’t have killed John O’Keefe. She claims Colin’s “screenshot” alibi removes his opportunity to have killed John. Well that means Karen connecting to the WiFi at 1 Meadows Ave at 12:36am also proves she couldn’t have killed John either, warranting dismissal of the charges. Specifically, Judge Beverly Cannone validated Colin Albert’s alibi, stating: “There is no evidence that [he] was at 34 Fairview when the defendant and Mr. O’Keefe arrived at the home.” “Evidence at the first trial was that Colin Albert had already been picked up by the time O’Keefe and the defendant arrived at 34 Fairview.” She’s apparently playing “fact finder” (the jury’s role) now to deny more constitutional rights of Karen Read’s, and preclude her from raising a third party culprit defense involving Colin Albert based on nothing more than some flimsy, unverifiable, metadata-stripped screenshots of alleged “text messages” as an alibi, provided 2 years after the fact by un-credible witnesses. Well, guess what Beverly? I’d say you just provided excellent grounds for a subsequent Motion to Dismiss, per the Commonwealth’s evidence proving the defendant’s alibi—that Karen Read was back home and connected to the WiFi at 1 Meadows Ave by 12:36am. Not only is this far more credible and reliable alibi evidence (data don’t lie) than a purported screenshot, but the Commonwealth’s own timeline and the evidentiary timeline make it physically impossible for Karen Read to have killed John O’Keefe—she was nowhere near John nor 34 Fairview during the time that he was killed, and thus categorically had no opportunity to do so. In Karen’s case, not only is the evidence of opportunity wholly inadequate, but digital forensic data evidence from both the WiFi system at 1 Meadows Ave and Karen Read’s cellphone unequivocally prove she did not and could not have killed John O’Keefe. Dismiss the case and lock this disgraceful, tyrannical Judge up! #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

101,136 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING: New group text message revealed from Matt McCabe to Jen McCabe, Brian Albert and Nicole Albert, that was sent after Officer John O’Keefe was found murdered at 34 Fairview: “Yep, if she pleads out, it will end. If she fights it, it will be an episode.” The “she” is referring to Karen Read. That’s all these people wanted when they decided to frame Karen Read. They just wanted her to take it. Take the fall. Plead out and spare them from accountability. #KarenRead #JenMcCabe #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
0:22

BREAKING: New group text message revealed from Matt McCabe to Jen McCabe, Brian Albert and Nicole Albert, that was sent after Officer John O’Keefe was found murdered at 34 Fairview: “Yep, if she pleads out, it will end. If she fights it, it will be an episode.” The “she” is referring to Karen Read. That’s all these people wanted when they decided to frame Karen Read. They just wanted her to take it. Take the fall. Plead out and spare them from accountability. #KarenRead #JenMcCabe #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

308,873 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

#KarenRead || That awkward moment when ADA Adam Lally was asking Julie Albert about her morning donuts run to 34 Fairview when she went inside the house, if anything seemed different, “out of place or off from the evening before when [she] was there”. 🍩 Without missing a beat, Julie Albert replied: “Nothing”. But I thought Julie Albert didn’t go to 34 Fairview the evening before? Did ADA Adam Lally and Julie Albert momentarily forget the script? This is interesting because Julie and Chris Albert’s whereabouts after the bar always seem to be conflicting. —————— In the official Police report of Lead Investigator Michael Proctor and Yuri Bukhenik’s unrecorded & unsigned group interview (on February 10, 2022), of Julie and Chris Albert, it states: “Both Julie and Chris were present at the Waterfall Bar and Grill the night of January 28, 2022 and then followed to Brian Albert's home in the early morning hours of January 29, 2022. The purpose of the interview was to get their recollection of events both at the bar and then from 34 Fairview Rd.” (See attached). —————— Later in that same interview, Julie then happens to mention leaving the bar to go home due to a migraine. But, interestingly enough, there’s no information about where Chris Albert goes, how he gets there, etc., upon leaving the Bar. —————— So, did Julie and/or Chris Albert go to 34 Fairview after the Waterfall Bar? Why do their and the Commonwealth’s statements constantly seem to change regarding this fact? #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #JohnOKeefe
0:26

#KarenRead || That awkward moment when ADA Adam Lally was asking Julie Albert about her morning donuts run to 34 Fairview when she went inside the house, if anything seemed different, “out of place or off from the evening before when [she] was there”. 🍩 Without missing a beat, Julie Albert replied: “Nothing”. But I thought Julie Albert didn’t go to 34 Fairview the evening before? Did ADA Adam Lally and Julie Albert momentarily forget the script? This is interesting because Julie and Chris Albert’s whereabouts after the bar always seem to be conflicting. —————— In the official Police report of Lead Investigator Michael Proctor and Yuri Bukhenik’s unrecorded & unsigned group interview (on February 10, 2022), of Julie and Chris Albert, it states: “Both Julie and Chris were present at the Waterfall Bar and Grill the night of January 28, 2022 and then followed to Brian Albert's home in the early morning hours of January 29, 2022. The purpose of the interview was to get their recollection of events both at the bar and then from 34 Fairview Rd.” (See attached). —————— Later in that same interview, Julie then happens to mention leaving the bar to go home due to a migraine. But, interestingly enough, there’s no information about where Chris Albert goes, how he gets there, etc., upon leaving the Bar. —————— So, did Julie and/or Chris Albert go to 34 Fairview after the Waterfall Bar? Why do their and the Commonwealth’s statements constantly seem to change regarding this fact? #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #JohnOKeefe

Olivia

130,533 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Seeing Lt. Mike Lank at the Canton High hockey game reminded me of one of those little details from the Karen Read trial that somehow never gets less strange the more you look at it. Jennifer McCabe testified that on the morning of January 30th she left 1 Meadows, drove to Mike Lank’s house on Oakdale, and only went past 34 Fairview because that’s the normal way to get there. And to be fair, from 1 Meadows to Oakdale, yes… you could pass Fairview depending on the route. No problem there. Except for one small issue. Her Life360 data shows she didn’t go straight from 1 Meadows to Lank’s. It shows she went from 1 Meadows to Country Lane (her house) then she left her house and drove past 34 Fairview, then to Oakdale (Lank’s) Once you go to Country Lane first, driving past Fairview is no longer the natural route to Oakdale. Not even close. You would have to go out of your way to go by 34 Fairview. But in court, the explanation was simple…“We drove by Fairview because that’s the way we go to Lank’s.” Right. That works… only if you ignore the part where the phone data shows you went home first. Just one of those little coincidences in this case where the phones keep telling one story…and the witnesses keep telling another. But sure. Totally normal morning. Nothing to see here.
2:20

Seeing Lt. Mike Lank at the Canton High hockey game reminded me of one of those little details from the Karen Read trial that somehow never gets less strange the more you look at it. Jennifer McCabe testified that on the morning of January 30th she left 1 Meadows, drove to Mike Lank’s house on Oakdale, and only went past 34 Fairview because that’s the normal way to get there. And to be fair, from 1 Meadows to Oakdale, yes… you could pass Fairview depending on the route. No problem there. Except for one small issue. Her Life360 data shows she didn’t go straight from 1 Meadows to Lank’s. It shows she went from 1 Meadows to Country Lane (her house) then she left her house and drove past 34 Fairview, then to Oakdale (Lank’s) Once you go to Country Lane first, driving past Fairview is no longer the natural route to Oakdale. Not even close. You would have to go out of your way to go by 34 Fairview. But in court, the explanation was simple…“We drove by Fairview because that’s the way we go to Lank’s.” Right. That works… only if you ignore the part where the phone data shows you went home first. Just one of those little coincidences in this case where the phones keep telling one story…and the witnesses keep telling another. But sure. Totally normal morning. Nothing to see here.

Dixie Normus

24,482 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

BREAKING: Jen McCabe called her sister, Nicole Albert, at 34 Fairview at 5:07am the morning of January 29, 2022, and spoke with her for 38 seconds nearly 1 hour BEFORE Officer John O’Keefe’s body was found dying in the cold on Nicole Albert’s front yard! Then Jen McCabe proceeded to delay and divert #KarenRead for as long as possible from finding John O’Keefe or going to 34 Fairview Road. Why? Because “hos long to die in cold”. #JenMcCabe #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
0:58

BREAKING: Jen McCabe called her sister, Nicole Albert, at 34 Fairview at 5:07am the morning of January 29, 2022, and spoke with her for 38 seconds nearly 1 hour BEFORE Officer John O’Keefe’s body was found dying in the cold on Nicole Albert’s front yard! Then Jen McCabe proceeded to delay and divert #KarenRead for as long as possible from finding John O’Keefe or going to 34 Fairview Road. Why? Because “hos long to die in cold”. #JenMcCabe #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

185,389 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

You may be wondering why one of the MSP Troopers who investigated Officer #JohnOKeefe’s murder is glaringly absent from the prosecutions witness list in the #KarenReadTrial. Is that because her testimony might be devastating for the claim that Jen McCabe didn’t make that google search at 2:27am? Yes, it’d appear so! (Part 1 of 2). Attorney Yannetti gave us some insight yesterday into why Massachusetts State Police Trooper Kathleen Prince is notably missing from the state’s witness list, but is on the defense’s witness list. Why would the state want to avoid calling the Trooper that interviewed star “witness” Jen McCabe on February 1, 2022? After all, unlike Lead Investigator Michael Proctor’s unrecorded & unsigned interview of Jen, Trooper Prince’s interview is far more detailed and thorough, and Prince also didn’t wait several months to write down & document her interview like Proctor did. Well, perhaps it’s because Trooper Prince’s is the only interview of Jen McCabe’s that ever even mentions anything about the Google search & from Jen McCabe herself. However, this is not the only lie seemingly told by Jen McCabe that Trooper Prince’s interview will expose. McCabe claims that: “Karen was told to sit in a car. Jen went over to Karen when she was in the car…Jen also stated that while her and Karen were in the back of the car, Karen was yelling and screaming one moment and then completely calm the next. Jen said that they prayed the "Our Father" together. Karen then immediately yelled at Jen two times to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?" That’s a big problem for McCabe, which the state probably later realized, hence why they took the creative liberty to completely distort & change Jen’s statements in their later court filings, particularly about how the Google search came about. Why? Jen probably didn’t realize when making this statement to Trooper Prince, who she’s not close friends with unlike Michael Proctor, that the Police cars have dash-cams in them. Thus, if this conversation ever actually happened, like Jen claims, then it’d all be recorded on dash-cam footage. It’s convenient how Jen’s story about when #KarenRead purportedly asked her to Google such a thing also happened inside a car where nobody else would be able to hear it to corroborate Jen’s story. But again, in this early stage of the investigation, Jen likely was unaware that her entire claim would be debunked by the dash-cams that would’ve captured it as proof. So to her, being inside a car was the perfect explanation for why no one else at the scene heard Karen ask that. Because Karen never actually asked it! THIS is Jen McCabe framing Karen Read. But beyond this, we also now have confirmation from Officer Mullaney that Karen & Jen never got into a car together while he was there. So this entire story seems to have been fabricated altogether. In a desperate attempt to remedy this critical fact issue, the state just completely fabricated new testimony in its documents, stating that immediately upon finding John’s body, ‘The defendant then yelled at Ms. McCabe twice to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?’, or something to that effect.” What else was fabricated? The claim that Jen McCabe was taking any measures to try to help save Officer O’Keefe’s life, unlike Read who was. In her interview with Prince, Jen claims: “[She] observed Karen to have blood on her hands and face. Karen was holding her hands up and was saying, ‘I have my period.’ Jen said that she told Karen that was not her blood that it was John's blood from them doing CPR.” Jen McCabe’s trying to win favor for trying to help save John’s life—something she did not do—when she says that the blood on Karen’s face “was John’s blood from them doing CPR”. Except “they” didn’t do CPR. Only Karen Read did CPR as confirmed by yesterday’s 3 state’s first responder witnesses who confirmed as such. #FreeKarenRead
0:47

You may be wondering why one of the MSP Troopers who investigated Officer #JohnOKeefe’s murder is glaringly absent from the prosecutions witness list in the #KarenReadTrial. Is that because her testimony might be devastating for the claim that Jen McCabe didn’t make that google search at 2:27am? Yes, it’d appear so! (Part 1 of 2). Attorney Yannetti gave us some insight yesterday into why Massachusetts State Police Trooper Kathleen Prince is notably missing from the state’s witness list, but is on the defense’s witness list. Why would the state want to avoid calling the Trooper that interviewed star “witness” Jen McCabe on February 1, 2022? After all, unlike Lead Investigator Michael Proctor’s unrecorded & unsigned interview of Jen, Trooper Prince’s interview is far more detailed and thorough, and Prince also didn’t wait several months to write down & document her interview like Proctor did. Well, perhaps it’s because Trooper Prince’s is the only interview of Jen McCabe’s that ever even mentions anything about the Google search & from Jen McCabe herself. However, this is not the only lie seemingly told by Jen McCabe that Trooper Prince’s interview will expose. McCabe claims that: “Karen was told to sit in a car. Jen went over to Karen when she was in the car…Jen also stated that while her and Karen were in the back of the car, Karen was yelling and screaming one moment and then completely calm the next. Jen said that they prayed the "Our Father" together. Karen then immediately yelled at Jen two times to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?" That’s a big problem for McCabe, which the state probably later realized, hence why they took the creative liberty to completely distort & change Jen’s statements in their later court filings, particularly about how the Google search came about. Why? Jen probably didn’t realize when making this statement to Trooper Prince, who she’s not close friends with unlike Michael Proctor, that the Police cars have dash-cams in them. Thus, if this conversation ever actually happened, like Jen claims, then it’d all be recorded on dash-cam footage. It’s convenient how Jen’s story about when #KarenRead purportedly asked her to Google such a thing also happened inside a car where nobody else would be able to hear it to corroborate Jen’s story. But again, in this early stage of the investigation, Jen likely was unaware that her entire claim would be debunked by the dash-cams that would’ve captured it as proof. So to her, being inside a car was the perfect explanation for why no one else at the scene heard Karen ask that. Because Karen never actually asked it! THIS is Jen McCabe framing Karen Read. But beyond this, we also now have confirmation from Officer Mullaney that Karen & Jen never got into a car together while he was there. So this entire story seems to have been fabricated altogether. In a desperate attempt to remedy this critical fact issue, the state just completely fabricated new testimony in its documents, stating that immediately upon finding John’s body, ‘The defendant then yelled at Ms. McCabe twice to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?’, or something to that effect.” What else was fabricated? The claim that Jen McCabe was taking any measures to try to help save Officer O’Keefe’s life, unlike Read who was. In her interview with Prince, Jen claims: “[She] observed Karen to have blood on her hands and face. Karen was holding her hands up and was saying, ‘I have my period.’ Jen said that she told Karen that was not her blood that it was John's blood from them doing CPR.” Jen McCabe’s trying to win favor for trying to help save John’s life—something she did not do—when she says that the blood on Karen’s face “was John’s blood from them doing CPR”. Except “they” didn’t do CPR. Only Karen Read did CPR as confirmed by yesterday’s 3 state’s first responder witnesses who confirmed as such. #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

193,892 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Did Sergeant Michael Lank have John O’Keefe’s phone? See Samantha’s episode below this quote. If the phone was transferred to Lank before he arrived at 34 Fairview, it could explain the 400+ steps recorded at 6:04 a.m. and the phone’s activity that entire morning. Lank met with Jen McCabe later that morning and she had her “Did I hit him?” recollection. He also makes a call to Gallagher after this meeting to put on the record the scene officers heard Karen say this, to which they all later testified they did not. Lank also appears to admit having John’s phone in Officer Saraf’s cruiser. Jen McCabe and Kerry Roberts also met with Lank the next morning. That meeting was never disclosed to the defense or documented, which gave us Jen McCabe’s awkward cross examination “OH MY GOSH” testimony. Guarino claimed in his police report that Proctor secured John’s phone on the 29th at the scene, which we know was not accurate. Still, questions remain: ✨How else would so many steps be recorded before their arrival at 34 Fairview if this is not correct? ✨Why transfer the phone to Lank instead of placing it under John? Kerry does appear to hand over a phone at this time in question. ✨Why would Kerry and Lank be so evasive about having John’s phone? ✨Why would such an important piece of evidence have so many false statements.
1:34

Did Sergeant Michael Lank have John O’Keefe’s phone? See Samantha’s episode below this quote. If the phone was transferred to Lank before he arrived at 34 Fairview, it could explain the 400+ steps recorded at 6:04 a.m. and the phone’s activity that entire morning. Lank met with Jen McCabe later that morning and she had her “Did I hit him?” recollection. He also makes a call to Gallagher after this meeting to put on the record the scene officers heard Karen say this, to which they all later testified they did not. Lank also appears to admit having John’s phone in Officer Saraf’s cruiser. Jen McCabe and Kerry Roberts also met with Lank the next morning. That meeting was never disclosed to the defense or documented, which gave us Jen McCabe’s awkward cross examination “OH MY GOSH” testimony. Guarino claimed in his police report that Proctor secured John’s phone on the 29th at the scene, which we know was not accurate. Still, questions remain: ✨How else would so many steps be recorded before their arrival at 34 Fairview if this is not correct? ✨Why transfer the phone to Lank instead of placing it under John? Kerry does appear to hand over a phone at this time in question. ✨Why would Kerry and Lank be so evasive about having John’s phone? ✨Why would such an important piece of evidence have so many false statements.

Lara

37,034 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten