Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

This only gets better. The same RCMP officer that emailed me below saying I was confused about Level 2 vs Level 3 gave an interview on CTV News Vancouver proudly proclaiming that FSD is illegal, and that just because you talk to your friends or talk on social media... show more

Drive Tesla 🇨🇦

73,595 subscribers

72,046 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

My Model Y drove it itself from New Hampshire to New York City and back again. I just sat in the driver seat and supervised it. Tesla’s FSD is currently the only system that enables you to do this. 500 mile FSD streak milestone:

My Model Y drove it itself from New Hampshire to New York City and back again. I just sat in the driver seat and supervised it. Tesla’s FSD is currently the only system that enables you to do this. 500 mile FSD streak milestone:

Sawyer Merritt

355,790 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

We just updated our internal market research system It's the ONE THING that will make your ads, copy and landing pages 100x better And the best thing is that it takes only 30 minutes Like + Comment "research" and I'll DM the guide to you (must follow)

We just updated our internal market research system It's the ONE THING that will make your ads, copy and landing pages 100x better And the best thing is that it takes only 30 minutes Like + Comment "research" and I'll DM the guide to you (must follow)

🍀 Federico Bartoli

10,882 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Searching for relevancy or even attention makes one scratch their head. …Or is it that your behaviour precedes you and no one want’s to be associated with that level of toxicity.

Searching for relevancy or even attention makes one scratch their head. …Or is it that your behaviour precedes you and no one want’s to be associated with that level of toxicity.

Julius . D

89,728 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I'd be careful in how you talk about this subject. It is very easy, even if you are familiar with it, to spread misinformation. The Vril Droning process involves cloning and exposing the clone to a Vril parasite that takes over the central nervous system. It is very possible. It is said to be one of the darkest masonic secrets, and that they inhabit the hollow earth through the entrance in Antarctica. I find it really interesting, but it could just be something created to excuse behaviors. I have a video that explains how they actually use adrenochrome for nutrition. It is a theory but I think it has some ground to stand on. It is said that it is the reason for the floods/storms because they are waging war on them and they inhabit the deep underground bases. It is a subterranean war. It is a fun subject to talk about.

I'd be careful in how you talk about this subject. It is very easy, even if you are familiar with it, to spread misinformation. The Vril Droning process involves cloning and exposing the clone to a Vril parasite that takes over the central nervous system. It is very possible. It is said to be one of the darkest masonic secrets, and that they inhabit the hollow earth through the entrance in Antarctica. I find it really interesting, but it could just be something created to excuse behaviors. I have a video that explains how they actually use adrenochrome for nutrition. It is a theory but I think it has some ground to stand on. It is said that it is the reason for the floods/storms because they are waging war on them and they inhabit the deep underground bases. It is a subterranean war. It is a fun subject to talk about.

Mofobian

127,903 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Running your mouth and not doing any research is what’s about to have you owing Megan for the rest of your life. That tweet was about a very specific situation and there was a whole back and forth that followed with the party it was referencing. On the timeline. I want to be very clear that sympathy is never wanted or needed from you btches. Cuz what we gon do with it? Life will carry on, money will still be made, shit will still sell. Y’all gonna talk anyway. You work for us fr 😂

Running your mouth and not doing any research is what’s about to have you owing Megan for the rest of your life. That tweet was about a very specific situation and there was a whole back and forth that followed with the party it was referencing. On the timeline. I want to be very clear that sympathy is never wanted or needed from you btches. Cuz what we gon do with it? Life will carry on, money will still be made, shit will still sell. Y’all gonna talk anyway. You work for us fr 😂

KenBarbie™

142,314 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The problem with lane filtering laws in Colorado is that motorcyclists think this is legal (or don’t care). This is Lane Splitting. This is illegal. And I see it daily. 😑

The problem with lane filtering laws in Colorado is that motorcyclists think this is legal (or don’t care). This is Lane Splitting. This is illegal. And I see it daily. 😑

Zero Tolerance Policy

44,963 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

“You should not defend everything that the Israeli government does. Period. You are loyal to one thing only. You are loyal to Jesus Christ. And that is it. That is your standard.” — Charlie Kirk ✝️

“You should not defend everything that the Israeli government does. Period. You are loyal to one thing only. You are loyal to Jesus Christ. And that is it. That is your standard.” — Charlie Kirk ✝️

Travis

58,388 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This whole comment and its reply section lol 😂 "Srsly, this is my first time seeing someone liven '이윽고' up" > "I was like 'Hmm..is he actually on that level' and he actually is on that level" > "I was like 'What a fcking bullsh!t' and then listened to it and it actually is dope" >> ㅋㅋㅋ fr ㅋㅋㅋ >> ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ > "I judge it by whether I get goosebumps or not and this one actually gives me goosebumps" For a little context, the song that they're talking about is Sung sikyung's song called "Every moment of you". For Sung sikyung's fans or GP, the very beginning, the very first word of that song which is "이윽고 (Yet)" is just sacred if I must say because they think only Sung sikyung, the original singer, can liven that part up. But when they see Kyungsoo sing that song, that specific part, they just can't help but to admit it 😌

This whole comment and its reply section lol 😂 "Srsly, this is my first time seeing someone liven '이윽고' up" > "I was like 'Hmm..is he actually on that level' and he actually is on that level" > "I was like 'What a fcking bullsh!t' and then listened to it and it actually is dope" >> ㅋㅋㅋ fr ㅋㅋㅋ >> ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ > "I judge it by whether I get goosebumps or not and this one actually gives me goosebumps" For a little context, the song that they're talking about is Sung sikyung's song called "Every moment of you". For Sung sikyung's fans or GP, the very beginning, the very first word of that song which is "이윽고 (Yet)" is just sacred if I must say because they think only Sung sikyung, the original singer, can liven that part up. But when they see Kyungsoo sing that song, that specific part, they just can't help but to admit it 😌

🐶 AURA 🐧 큥됴 ♡

21,825 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Contrail lesson! 1. “Chemtrails” don’t exist. Just to get that out of the way. 2. Observe the satellite loop and Skew-T chart. In the IR satellite loop you can see yesterday, the West Coast had a decent short wave ridge suppressing moisture over California and Nevada. Today, you can see moisture from a low pressure over the Pacific spilling over the ridge that is now moving east of California. This is upper level moisture ADVECTING into the area. This upper level moisture is mainly above the 500mb level, or 20,000ft. 3. Now observe the Skew-T chart. Particularly clue into the 300mb level. This is a perfect example of what I talk about all the time, and why it’s important to pay attention to the 300mb level. This moisture layer is advecting particularly at the 300mb level, and synoptic scale cirrus development, and advection, typically occurs at 300mb. This is key because aircraft are flying at and above the 300mb level. 4. So, lastly, observe the pictures that I took of the sky over northern Nevada at the time of this post. You can see the layer of cirrus as well as contrails persisting in that moisture layer, exactly as depicted in the satellite shot AND confirmed by the Skew-T chart. Keep in mind that temperatures at this level of the atmosphere are typically -20 to -50°C. In this case, you can see that the temperature at 300mb is -40°C and relative humidities at this level are far different than what you experience at the surface. Any decrease in the gap between temperature and dewpoint at this level can significantly increase the relative humidity. This is why it’s referred to as “relative”because it’s far different than temperatures and dew points at the surface. So, to bring it all together, aircraft flying at these altitudes, which most commercial and military aircraft do, injecting warm, moist air from the engines rapidly into the super cooled environment, not only instantly form contrails, but when relative humidities are as depicted in this example, will enable contrails to persist for hours at a time supported by the moisture existing in that layer. This is what causes persistent contrails. These ARE NOT “chemtrails” and because they persist, does not, and will not ever, make them “chemtrails.” Now that you all needed your government to tell you that climate change was a hoax and I’ve been telling you for years that the “Geoengineering” and “chemtrail” nonsense are propaganda directly related to the climate change hoax, hopefully you can take some time to learn the basics of the atmosphere and understand what I’m showing you here, and how it works, so you’re not fooled by climate propaganda going forward. Thank you for your attention to this matter. 💪🏼🇺🇸

Contrail lesson! 1. “Chemtrails” don’t exist. Just to get that out of the way. 2. Observe the satellite loop and Skew-T chart. In the IR satellite loop you can see yesterday, the West Coast had a decent short wave ridge suppressing moisture over California and Nevada. Today, you can see moisture from a low pressure over the Pacific spilling over the ridge that is now moving east of California. This is upper level moisture ADVECTING into the area. This upper level moisture is mainly above the 500mb level, or 20,000ft. 3. Now observe the Skew-T chart. Particularly clue into the 300mb level. This is a perfect example of what I talk about all the time, and why it’s important to pay attention to the 300mb level. This moisture layer is advecting particularly at the 300mb level, and synoptic scale cirrus development, and advection, typically occurs at 300mb. This is key because aircraft are flying at and above the 300mb level. 4. So, lastly, observe the pictures that I took of the sky over northern Nevada at the time of this post. You can see the layer of cirrus as well as contrails persisting in that moisture layer, exactly as depicted in the satellite shot AND confirmed by the Skew-T chart. Keep in mind that temperatures at this level of the atmosphere are typically -20 to -50°C. In this case, you can see that the temperature at 300mb is -40°C and relative humidities at this level are far different than what you experience at the surface. Any decrease in the gap between temperature and dewpoint at this level can significantly increase the relative humidity. This is why it’s referred to as “relative”because it’s far different than temperatures and dew points at the surface. So, to bring it all together, aircraft flying at these altitudes, which most commercial and military aircraft do, injecting warm, moist air from the engines rapidly into the super cooled environment, not only instantly form contrails, but when relative humidities are as depicted in this example, will enable contrails to persist for hours at a time supported by the moisture existing in that layer. This is what causes persistent contrails. These ARE NOT “chemtrails” and because they persist, does not, and will not ever, make them “chemtrails.” Now that you all needed your government to tell you that climate change was a hoax and I’ve been telling you for years that the “Geoengineering” and “chemtrail” nonsense are propaganda directly related to the climate change hoax, hopefully you can take some time to learn the basics of the atmosphere and understand what I’m showing you here, and how it works, so you’re not fooled by climate propaganda going forward. Thank you for your attention to this matter. 💪🏼🇺🇸

Dylan Tucker

26,804 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Is your toddler suddenly throwing (or dropping) everything they get their hands on? Food, toys… you name it. You’re not alone. This week I’ve been introducing play schemas, 9 common patterns that can help to demystify your toddler’s seemingly random behaviors. And you guessed it: this is one. We call it the trajectory schema. If you take nothing else away from this post, let it be this: your little one doesn’t throw things because they are misbehaving or “bad.” Babies throw things because they are babies. And they are learning as they do so. Learning about cause and effect. Learning about gravity. Learning what (and practicing something new) they can do with their bodies. Learning hand-eye coordination. It’s a completely normal part of development. And the fascination won’t last forever. The real question is, how do you manage it? First, be proactive. Expect that anything your little one handles might reasonably be thrown or dropped. So choose wisely, avoiding items that are valuable or might pose a danger to them or others if they suddenly took flight. Second, depending on the age of your child, begin introducing some natural consequences. Put the toy/object away temporarily after it is thrown (if throwing it is dangerous or inappropriate). And involve your child in the subsequent clean-up. You can also redirect. Explain which things are and are not for throwing. Model the correct use of these objects. Finally, lean into it. Recognizing that young children are drawn to throwing, provide items that are safe and acceptable to throw. Soft toys. Socks. Balls. And look for opportunities and settings for your little one to explore this urge safely and appropriately. How did you manage your toddler’s throwing phase? Welcome your tips and tricks! This sweet little throwing machine was posted to TT by kristinnicole122.

Is your toddler suddenly throwing (or dropping) everything they get their hands on? Food, toys… you name it. You’re not alone. This week I’ve been introducing play schemas, 9 common patterns that can help to demystify your toddler’s seemingly random behaviors. And you guessed it: this is one. We call it the trajectory schema. If you take nothing else away from this post, let it be this: your little one doesn’t throw things because they are misbehaving or “bad.” Babies throw things because they are babies. And they are learning as they do so. Learning about cause and effect. Learning about gravity. Learning what (and practicing something new) they can do with their bodies. Learning hand-eye coordination. It’s a completely normal part of development. And the fascination won’t last forever. The real question is, how do you manage it? First, be proactive. Expect that anything your little one handles might reasonably be thrown or dropped. So choose wisely, avoiding items that are valuable or might pose a danger to them or others if they suddenly took flight. Second, depending on the age of your child, begin introducing some natural consequences. Put the toy/object away temporarily after it is thrown (if throwing it is dangerous or inappropriate). And involve your child in the subsequent clean-up. You can also redirect. Explain which things are and are not for throwing. Model the correct use of these objects. Finally, lean into it. Recognizing that young children are drawn to throwing, provide items that are safe and acceptable to throw. Soft toys. Socks. Balls. And look for opportunities and settings for your little one to explore this urge safely and appropriately. How did you manage your toddler’s throwing phase? Welcome your tips and tricks! This sweet little throwing machine was posted to TT by kristinnicole122.

Dan Wuori

168,975 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The scoreboard doesn’t care about your intentions. Your competitors don’t care about your excuses. And your potential doesn’t care about your promises. So here’s the question: Are you committed to the process… or just attached to the outcome? Talk is easy. Do the work.

The scoreboard doesn’t care about your intentions. Your competitors don’t care about your excuses. And your potential doesn’t care about your promises. So here’s the question: Are you committed to the process… or just attached to the outcome? Talk is easy. Do the work.

The Winning Difference

43,193 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Friends, today I want to speak to you from the heart. You can choose to look at Ukraine’s struggle with compassion — feeling the weight of unimaginable suffering its people are enduring. Or you can look at it with pragmatic clarity — realizing that supporting Ukraine is not just charity, but an investment in our shared safety and the future of our world. Everyone has their own perspective. But there is one truth that cannot be denied: we must stand together, and we must give everything we can. It is no longer about blaming hesitant leaders or pointing to failed diplomacy. That time has passed. Now it is about us. About you and me. About ordinary people who understand that the future depends on our choices today. I ask you — not just to donate, but to make a statement. To say with your action: I refuse to stand aside. I choose to protect the future. I choose to help. Find your reason. Make it personal. And let’s show the world what unity truly means. Together, we will endure. Together, we will win

Friends, today I want to speak to you from the heart. You can choose to look at Ukraine’s struggle with compassion — feeling the weight of unimaginable suffering its people are enduring. Or you can look at it with pragmatic clarity — realizing that supporting Ukraine is not just charity, but an investment in our shared safety and the future of our world. Everyone has their own perspective. But there is one truth that cannot be denied: we must stand together, and we must give everything we can. It is no longer about blaming hesitant leaders or pointing to failed diplomacy. That time has passed. Now it is about us. About you and me. About ordinary people who understand that the future depends on our choices today. I ask you — not just to donate, but to make a statement. To say with your action: I refuse to stand aside. I choose to protect the future. I choose to help. Find your reason. Make it personal. And let’s show the world what unity truly means. Together, we will endure. Together, we will win

Дмитро (Ісус) Щипков

71,451 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

I don't care about what you want. I care about what you repeat. Because your brain does not run on intention. It runs on repetition. Every thought you keep returning to, your brain treats as a signal. And the more you send that signal, the stronger and faster that neural pathway becomes. Here is the science behind it. When you repeatedly activate a neural pathway, your brain wraps a fatty substance called myelin around it. Think of it like insulation around an electrical wire. The more myelin, the faster the signal travels. The faster the signal travels, the more automatic that thought or behavior becomes. This is Hebb's Law. Neurons that fire together, wire together. And here is the part most people miss. Your brain does not care what you are reinforcing. It does not filter for good or bad. It just responds to what you keep repeating. Repeat confidence. Your brain builds it. Repeat self-doubt. Your brain builds that too. The same biological process that wires in focus, discipline, and certainty is the exact same one wiring in anxiety, fear, and limitation. You are not wired a certain way forever. You are wired for whatever you keep practicing. So stop asking what you want to change. Start asking what you are willing to repeat. ✨🙌🏾💫

I don't care about what you want. I care about what you repeat. Because your brain does not run on intention. It runs on repetition. Every thought you keep returning to, your brain treats as a signal. And the more you send that signal, the stronger and faster that neural pathway becomes. Here is the science behind it. When you repeatedly activate a neural pathway, your brain wraps a fatty substance called myelin around it. Think of it like insulation around an electrical wire. The more myelin, the faster the signal travels. The faster the signal travels, the more automatic that thought or behavior becomes. This is Hebb's Law. Neurons that fire together, wire together. And here is the part most people miss. Your brain does not care what you are reinforcing. It does not filter for good or bad. It just responds to what you keep repeating. Repeat confidence. Your brain builds it. Repeat self-doubt. Your brain builds that too. The same biological process that wires in focus, discipline, and certainty is the exact same one wiring in anxiety, fear, and limitation. You are not wired a certain way forever. You are wired for whatever you keep practicing. So stop asking what you want to change. Start asking what you are willing to repeat. ✨🙌🏾💫

🧬Maxpein🧬

53,929 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

taylor singing "is it really your anxiety that stops you from giving me everything, or do you just .. not want to?" and then smiling like that ... while the lyrics are onscreen in her handwriting ... are you seeing this

taylor singing "is it really your anxiety that stops you from giving me everything, or do you just .. not want to?" and then smiling like that ... while the lyrics are onscreen in her handwriting ... are you seeing this

taylor

266,016 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Sky News, "If the government agrees, with everyone from the Bank of England, to the OBR, to their own treasury research, that Brexit is a drag on economic growth" "And that Labour's number one priority is that very growth itself" "Why not do something about it?" #RejoinEU

Sky News, "If the government agrees, with everyone from the Bank of England, to the OBR, to their own treasury research, that Brexit is a drag on economic growth" "And that Labour's number one priority is that very growth itself" "Why not do something about it?" #RejoinEU

Farrukh

77,764 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨 BOOM! AG Todd Blanche just MIC DROPPED Fake News NBC as Democrats keep claiming President Trump and Pete Hegseth are committing illegal acts "Suggesting that President Trump or this administration or the Department of War is violating the law is just completely WRONG. It's not appropriate to say that. We are not!" "We are complying with the law. I can tell you that as the acting attorney general. We are doing exactly what we're supposed to do legally and President Trump will continue to do that." 🔥

🚨 BOOM! AG Todd Blanche just MIC DROPPED Fake News NBC as Democrats keep claiming President Trump and Pete Hegseth are committing illegal acts "Suggesting that President Trump or this administration or the Department of War is violating the law is just completely WRONG. It's not appropriate to say that. We are not!" "We are complying with the law. I can tell you that as the acting attorney general. We are doing exactly what we're supposed to do legally and President Trump will continue to do that." 🔥

Eric Daugherty

59,873 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Dawah is deception. Why are you leaving out the context SeerahPro ? You know right after this he says he doesn’t remember well what he wrote in that entry on Muhaymin. Why leave that part out? He even goes on to say that section seems to be non-committal and he needs to go back and re-read it. So since you don’t want to show every one the full context, I’ll do it, and expose how you are lying now and lied in the debate. Sinai doesn’t help your claim that the Quran believes the previous scriptures were textually corrupted. He says he doesn’t think the Quran believes the previous scriptures were corrupted in the deep past and that they are unrecoverable (Clip 1). Now let’s look at the short clip you pulled in context (Clip 2). First, what he says does not affirm why you cited him to begin with, which is that the Quran is supposed to be a supreme authority and determine which parts of our scriptures are corrupt and which are not. In the very clip you pulled he says, “The Quran is claiming to be able to sort of determine the correct reading of these previous scriptures and to remedy misreading and misunderstandings.” So by arbiter he means it is not determining what parts of our scriptures are true or corrupted, it is only an arbiter in determining meaning. You just buried yourself by citing this, because you implied Sinai was saying the Quran is an arbiter for determining textual corruption, which he doesn’t say. It’s like you didn’t even pay attention to what you pulled. That is embarrassing. Second, right after this (in what you left out) the interviewer reminds him he entertained two possibilities in his book and was noncommittal. Sinai says he doesn’t remember what he said and was probably leaving open possibilities, which is what I already had to correct you on. If you go back to the book, once again, he said on page 707 essentially what I said, “Muhaymin, meanwhile, is derived from Syriac mhaymnā (or conceivably from its equivalent in some other form of Aramaic), a passive participle of the verb haymen and meaning ‘trustworthy, faithful, loyal.’” After this all he does in the book is mention other possibilities and the one you want is more contingent on non-canonical readings. But even if that interpretation is correct (which Sinai confirms in this interview is his view) it doesn’t help you, because you misunderstood what Sinai means by ‘arbiter.’ In Clip 3 he first says, “So I need to reread that entry. I guess it seems to be very non-committal.” But remember you said (Clip 4), “In his 'Key Terms of the Quran' he explicitly says that Muhaymin means the Quran is the arbiter of the contents.” That is incorrect. He did not explicitly say that. Why did you lie? In Clip 3 he goes on to say “But I think entrusted with authority can mean, authorized to sort of authoritatively interpret and determine especially theological significance.” So you don’t even understand what Sinai means by “arbiter.” He doesn’t mean what you mean, that the Quran is determining which parts of our scriptures are true and corrupted, but that it is an arbiter of meaning. The fact that you still do not see this means you are beyond delusional. You never should have cited Sinai because he doesn’t help you at all. The funny thing is we were already planning to go live tomorrow to review this interview because he doesn’t help you at all and unintentionally helps with the Islamic Dilemma.

Dawah is deception. Why are you leaving out the context SeerahPro ? You know right after this he says he doesn’t remember well what he wrote in that entry on Muhaymin. Why leave that part out? He even goes on to say that section seems to be non-committal and he needs to go back and re-read it. So since you don’t want to show every one the full context, I’ll do it, and expose how you are lying now and lied in the debate. Sinai doesn’t help your claim that the Quran believes the previous scriptures were textually corrupted. He says he doesn’t think the Quran believes the previous scriptures were corrupted in the deep past and that they are unrecoverable (Clip 1). Now let’s look at the short clip you pulled in context (Clip 2). First, what he says does not affirm why you cited him to begin with, which is that the Quran is supposed to be a supreme authority and determine which parts of our scriptures are corrupt and which are not. In the very clip you pulled he says, “The Quran is claiming to be able to sort of determine the correct reading of these previous scriptures and to remedy misreading and misunderstandings.” So by arbiter he means it is not determining what parts of our scriptures are true or corrupted, it is only an arbiter in determining meaning. You just buried yourself by citing this, because you implied Sinai was saying the Quran is an arbiter for determining textual corruption, which he doesn’t say. It’s like you didn’t even pay attention to what you pulled. That is embarrassing. Second, right after this (in what you left out) the interviewer reminds him he entertained two possibilities in his book and was noncommittal. Sinai says he doesn’t remember what he said and was probably leaving open possibilities, which is what I already had to correct you on. If you go back to the book, once again, he said on page 707 essentially what I said, “Muhaymin, meanwhile, is derived from Syriac mhaymnā (or conceivably from its equivalent in some other form of Aramaic), a passive participle of the verb haymen and meaning ‘trustworthy, faithful, loyal.’” After this all he does in the book is mention other possibilities and the one you want is more contingent on non-canonical readings. But even if that interpretation is correct (which Sinai confirms in this interview is his view) it doesn’t help you, because you misunderstood what Sinai means by ‘arbiter.’ In Clip 3 he first says, “So I need to reread that entry. I guess it seems to be very non-committal.” But remember you said (Clip 4), “In his 'Key Terms of the Quran' he explicitly says that Muhaymin means the Quran is the arbiter of the contents.” That is incorrect. He did not explicitly say that. Why did you lie? In Clip 3 he goes on to say “But I think entrusted with authority can mean, authorized to sort of authoritatively interpret and determine especially theological significance.” So you don’t even understand what Sinai means by “arbiter.” He doesn’t mean what you mean, that the Quran is determining which parts of our scriptures are true and corrupted, but that it is an arbiter of meaning. The fact that you still do not see this means you are beyond delusional. You never should have cited Sinai because he doesn’t help you at all. The funny thing is we were already planning to go live tomorrow to review this interview because he doesn’t help you at all and unintentionally helps with the Islamic Dilemma.

InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones

36,857 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat