正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

This portable microscope was designed by Opus 5 I gave it a few simple requirements, and it generated the whole design in code Lots of details and interactions It looks sci-fi, but it can be easily 3D printed Some of the code can even run on a Raspberry Pi...

35,446 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

34 条评论

Dilum Sanjaya 的头像
Dilum Sanjaya1 个月前

I don't usually share live links because it takes extra effort to get models to optimize performance and test everything, which is the boring part. But for something like this, performance isn't really the goal, and it's fun to play around with. So here's the "it works on my machine" version 😉

Eric Mono 的头像
Eric Mono1 个月前

This can be done purely with code? Any other plugins/connectors needed?

Dilum Sanjaya 的头像
Dilum Sanjaya1 个月前

yes, you don't need plugins or connectors

Aria Tech 的头像
Aria Tech1 个月前

opus 5 just designed a 3d printable microscope from scratch

Gabriel 的头像
Gabriel1 个月前

This is fucking awesome!.

Dilum Sanjaya 的头像
Dilum Sanjaya1 个月前

thanks Gabriel

Joebed Arts 的头像
Joebed Arts1 个月前

@threejs I love this!! Thanks for sharing

Dilum Sanjaya 的头像
Dilum Sanjaya1 个月前

thanks Joebed

Rugova 的头像
Rugova1 个月前

that's pure skill

Dilum Sanjaya 的头像
Dilum Sanjaya1 个月前

@aliuagon_ thanks

INK 的头像
INK1 个月前

so cool !

Dilum Sanjaya 的头像
Dilum Sanjaya1 个月前

thanks INK

NPCSlayer 的头像
NPCSlayer1 个月前

wow this is crazy! great work

Dilum Sanjaya 的头像
Dilum Sanjaya1 个月前

thanks

Ricole Bayes 的头像
Ricole Bayes1 个月前

time to find old optics to repurpose

JungheonLee | 이정헌 的头像
JungheonLee | 이정헌1 个月前

@threejs This is awesome! I’m curious how you made it. Did you use Blender MCP?

Dilum Sanjaya 的头像
Dilum Sanjaya1 个月前

No, this was made purely with three.js. In terms of looks, I'm sure if I started with Blender MCP and then imported it into three.js, I'd get a better result. The issue is that during that process, the model loses context around things like why it added a button in a certain place and what that button is supposed to do. So when it comes to making everything interactive in three.js, it becomes much more difficult. There's probably a better workflow for this, but I haven't found one yet.

JungheonLee | 이정헌 的头像
JungheonLee | 이정헌1 个月前

@threejs Thanks for your kind response!

Refil 的头像
Refil1 个月前

So amazing🔥

Dilum Sanjaya 的头像
Dilum Sanjaya1 个月前

thanks

Curtin Liu 的头像
Curtin Liu1 个月前

cooooool!

Dilum Sanjaya 的头像
Dilum Sanjaya1 个月前

thanks Curtin

Sofiia Matsiutsia 的头像
Sofiia Matsiutsia1 个月前

simple requirements = detailed architecture description of the microscope?! Brilliant as always, @DilumSanjaya 👏

Dilum Sanjaya 的头像
Dilum Sanjaya1 个月前

thanks Sofiia!

Pitchfork & Torch ♞ 的头像
Pitchfork & Torch ♞1 个月前

I want it and I don’t even know what it’s for

Dilum Sanjaya 的头像
Dilum Sanjaya1 个月前

😂

BuildWahab 的头像
BuildWahab1 个月前

Wow seeing you first till share the link to test 😅

Dilum Sanjaya 的头像
Dilum Sanjaya1 个月前

haha, most of my posts about things I coded myself do have CodePen/live links. but those were more for developers who are familiar with issues around performance and responsiveness. now my focus is on getting people who aren’t familiar with code to build cool stuff. to them, those might feel like issues with vibe coding rather than me just choosing not to spend time fixing them, since I’d rather use that time to experiment with different ideas. anyway, I might start posting links to at least some of the demos 😅

AI Mastery Guide 的头像
AI Mastery Guide1 个月前

Designed straight from requirements into 3D printable code

SomacoSF 的头像
SomacoSF1 个月前

HECK FN YEAH - this is dope. THIS IS FN AMAZING How can I get the UI/UX prompt -- meaning the UX of buttons and sliders and joystick Should be components for all sorts of experiences. This is one of the best things ive seem in a while.

Damir Wallener 的头像
Damir Wallener1 个月前

Does it work?

oy 的头像
oy1 个月前

提示词是什么

Gabriel 的头像
Gabriel1 个月前

just curious, can i get the prompt you used, if thats ok?

Nicolo 的头像
Nicolo1 个月前

Can you share the cad?

相关视频

I just compared Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor CLI The task was to build a Next.js app with Tailwind 4 and shadcn components to collect customer feedback and showcase it with a widget. I gave all three the same prompt and let them go for 30 minutes to see what they came up with. Claude Code with Opus 4.1 Even though I told it to set up the app in the existing project folder, it tried to create a directory for it. After I interrupted and told it not to do that, it built a demo form and landing page with no errors. I had to ask it to make the demo interactive so users could submit a testimonial and preview it. The landing page looked like AI and was pretty basic, but it worked and it was done in a fraction of the time of the others. Total tokens used: 33k Codex with GPT-5 At the end of the 30 minutes I just could not get Codex to produce a working app. It got stuck in a loop of not being able to set up Tailwind 4 and despite many, MANY, attempts, I ended up with a "failed to compile" error. Total tokens used: 102k Cursor Agent with GPT-5 This was the slowest agent by far and a couple of times I actually thought it got stuck in a loop and was close to Ctrl+C'ing to cancel it. The TUI is really nice though, especially how it shows diffs and it did eventually build a working app (after one or two slight errors that needed fixing) The demo was interactive and it had a very minimal design that looked bare but also a lot less like an "AI generated" app than the Opus 4.1 design. It also wasn't too chatty and just did what it needed to do! Code quality was on a par with Opus 4.1, but it did use 5.5x as many tokens to get there. Still cheaper than Opus on a direct comparison but not when you factor in a Claude Code Max subscription. Total tokens: 188k I'll be able to do a proper comparison and record some videos when I'm back from holiday but for now, Opus is still the more capable model out of the box and Claude Code is the more complete CLI product. It will be interesting to see how Cursor evolve their CLI though with commands and subagents because I think with GPT-5 they have a real shot at providing competition for Claude Code if they can optimise output to get similar quality with less tokens. Jump to 0:40 in the video to see the two apps. Which do you think is which? ;)

Ian Nuttall

195,173 次观看 • 1 年前