Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

This statement from Asad, a close associate of Hadi, is not a protest slogan or a call for an economic boycott alone; it is a direct incitement to mass violence. By openly calling for artists, public figures, and members of civil society to be “dragged,” “torn apart,” and “killed...

col_chaubey's profile picture

Colonel Mayank Chaubey

21,943 subscribers

58,717 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

As leaders of Nairobi City County, we condemn any acts of violence in the city. The current protests perpetuated by the tribalists and civil society are not meaningful to the people of Kenya. Every wannabe tribalist, politician and civil society leader has weaponised the anger of young people and is using it to bring chaos to the country. We say NO!
10:51

As leaders of Nairobi City County, we condemn any acts of violence in the city. The current protests perpetuated by the tribalists and civil society are not meaningful to the people of Kenya. Every wannabe tribalist, politician and civil society leader has weaponised the anger of young people and is using it to bring chaos to the country. We say NO!

Robert ALAI, HSC

61,286 views • 1 year ago

When public servants are attacked in their office, it is not just a breakdown of governance; it is a breakdown of trust in the very system meant to protect the people. In a shocking incident from Bhuvanagiri, a public servant was verbally abused and physically assaulted by a VCK Councillor, a member of the DMK Alliance. Threats of further attacks also followed this attack. This isn’t just an isolated act of lawlessness in the last 4 years in TN; it is a reflection of a political culture perpetrated by DMK that has normalised intimidation, violence, and absolute disregard for public institutions.
2:09

When public servants are attacked in their office, it is not just a breakdown of governance; it is a breakdown of trust in the very system meant to protect the people. In a shocking incident from Bhuvanagiri, a public servant was verbally abused and physically assaulted by a VCK Councillor, a member of the DMK Alliance. Threats of further attacks also followed this attack. This isn’t just an isolated act of lawlessness in the last 4 years in TN; it is a reflection of a political culture perpetrated by DMK that has normalised intimidation, violence, and absolute disregard for public institutions.

K.Annamalai

160,622 views • 1 year ago

Mehdi, here is a video by Palestinians for Palestinians - teaching them how to board public buses and execute all the Jews. Palestinians are making their choices as a society. It is a choice to try to destroy Israel instead of building their own paradise. You can call me a racist for understanding this, but it will still be the truth. Until Palestinians renounce violence as a society, Israel would be insane to invite them in.
0:59

Mehdi, here is a video by Palestinians for Palestinians - teaching them how to board public buses and execute all the Jews. Palestinians are making their choices as a society. It is a choice to try to destroy Israel instead of building their own paradise. You can call me a racist for understanding this, but it will still be the truth. Until Palestinians renounce violence as a society, Israel would be insane to invite them in.

Brianna Wu

316,368 views • 5 months ago

In light of recent events, I’m thinking about the First Amendment and how religion needs to present itself as a peaceful contributor to civil society. One condition for religious freedom is that believers seek to participate in the public square without recourse to violence.
3:33

In light of recent events, I’m thinking about the First Amendment and how religion needs to present itself as a peaceful contributor to civil society. One condition for religious freedom is that believers seek to participate in the public square without recourse to violence.

Bishop Robert Barron

39,670 views • 7 months ago

This is what incitement of violence sounds like. These are not insults or ridicule. These are incitements of violence. This type of rhetoric is meant to make people believe that Trump and his supporters are a direct threat to them, their families, and the country. Democrats create imaginary threats and then promise to save people from said threats. Look no further than the No Kings rallies. A bunch of people protesting a king that does not exist. When a political party is constantly preaching to the country that the other side is out to hurt them and to hurt the most vulnerable people in society, it shouldn't be a surprise when some people attempt to end the threats that they actually believe exist.
2:13

This is what incitement of violence sounds like. These are not insults or ridicule. These are incitements of violence. This type of rhetoric is meant to make people believe that Trump and his supporters are a direct threat to them, their families, and the country. Democrats create imaginary threats and then promise to save people from said threats. Look no further than the No Kings rallies. A bunch of people protesting a king that does not exist. When a political party is constantly preaching to the country that the other side is out to hurt them and to hurt the most vulnerable people in society, it shouldn't be a surprise when some people attempt to end the threats that they actually believe exist.

MAZE

109,074 views • 3 months ago

We are deeply concerned by the scenes that unfolded at the so-called “Resistance Festival” in Brussels, where masked men in military-style clothing and keffiyehs, carrying fake rifles, staged a performance that glorified terrorism. Such imagery, which evokes the rhetoric and symbols of terrorist groups like Hamas, has no place in a European capital, especially in a context where antisemitism is rising at alarming levels. The event, held in a public space and tolerated by local authorities, sends a deeply troubling message, not only to the Jewish community but to all those committed to democratic values and peaceful coexistence. We echo the concerns expressed by the CCOJB and FJO: Belgian Jews are being made scapegoats for a distant conflict, while scenes that glorify violence are allowed to unfold openly. This undermines social cohesion and contributes to a climate of fear and exclusion. We call on political leaders, local authorities and civil society to speak out clearly: Glorifying terror is not acceptable, it is incitement and it must be condemned.
1:28

We are deeply concerned by the scenes that unfolded at the so-called “Resistance Festival” in Brussels, where masked men in military-style clothing and keffiyehs, carrying fake rifles, staged a performance that glorified terrorism. Such imagery, which evokes the rhetoric and symbols of terrorist groups like Hamas, has no place in a European capital, especially in a context where antisemitism is rising at alarming levels. The event, held in a public space and tolerated by local authorities, sends a deeply troubling message, not only to the Jewish community but to all those committed to democratic values and peaceful coexistence. We echo the concerns expressed by the CCOJB and FJO: Belgian Jews are being made scapegoats for a distant conflict, while scenes that glorify violence are allowed to unfold openly. This undermines social cohesion and contributes to a climate of fear and exclusion. We call on political leaders, local authorities and civil society to speak out clearly: Glorifying terror is not acceptable, it is incitement and it must be condemned.

European Jewish Congress

12,465 views • 1 year ago

This is incitement wrapped in religious language. It deserves firm and public condemnation. When a senior Saudi cleric signals support for another October 7-style attack, the message travels far beyond a sermon or a lecture hall. Such rhetoric legitimizes violence in the minds of those already vulnerable to extremist narratives. Responsible religious authority carries the duty to calm tensions, protect civilian life, and elevate ethical discourse. Sheikh Saad Al-Shathri holds positions of significant influence. He is a member of the Council of Senior Scholars in Saudi Arabia, a minister-rank advisor at the Royal Court, a faculty member at King Saud University, and one of the eight preachers entrusted to deliver the Arafah sermon during the Saudi era. Words delivered from platforms of this magnitude shape perceptions across regions and audiences. Describing Israel as an “entity planted by the USA” and invoking the language of renewed attacks feeds a dangerous ecosystem of antisemitism and mobilization. This rhetoric erodes stability, inflames tensions, and empowers the very forces that responsible leadership across the region has worked to contain. Incitement to violence and antisemitic agitation violate the basic norms expected by international partners in Europe and the United States. Public figures who engage in such rhetoric invite scrutiny regarding their access to Western platforms and travel privileges. Condemning this language is a matter of principle and security. Clear accountability, firm rejection of extremist incitement, and sustained pressure against voices that promote violence remain essential for any serious path toward regional stability and durable peace.
0:43

This is incitement wrapped in religious language. It deserves firm and public condemnation. When a senior Saudi cleric signals support for another October 7-style attack, the message travels far beyond a sermon or a lecture hall. Such rhetoric legitimizes violence in the minds of those already vulnerable to extremist narratives. Responsible religious authority carries the duty to calm tensions, protect civilian life, and elevate ethical discourse. Sheikh Saad Al-Shathri holds positions of significant influence. He is a member of the Council of Senior Scholars in Saudi Arabia, a minister-rank advisor at the Royal Court, a faculty member at King Saud University, and one of the eight preachers entrusted to deliver the Arafah sermon during the Saudi era. Words delivered from platforms of this magnitude shape perceptions across regions and audiences. Describing Israel as an “entity planted by the USA” and invoking the language of renewed attacks feeds a dangerous ecosystem of antisemitism and mobilization. This rhetoric erodes stability, inflames tensions, and empowers the very forces that responsible leadership across the region has worked to contain. Incitement to violence and antisemitic agitation violate the basic norms expected by international partners in Europe and the United States. Public figures who engage in such rhetoric invite scrutiny regarding their access to Western platforms and travel privileges. Condemning this language is a matter of principle and security. Clear accountability, firm rejection of extremist incitement, and sustained pressure against voices that promote violence remain essential for any serious path toward regional stability and durable peace.

أحمد شريف العامري

2,431,670 views • 5 months ago

As the right throw around accusations of liberal activists being ‘terrorists’. Aside from it being utter nonsense, this is all part of a carefully crafted narrative designed to not only stoke division, it is an inferred call to violent action. I can tell you without fear of contradiction that Charlie Kirk was a stochastic terrorist. Stochastic terrorism is a form of political violence instigated by hostile public rhetoric directed at a group or an individual. Unlike incitement to terrorism, stochastic terrorism is accomplished with indirect, vague or coded language, which grants the instigator plausible deniability for any associated violence. This is a textbook definition of the president, the vice president and every major right wing talking head. And there was I thinking the US does not negotiate with terrorists. Might that be because the government itself is a terrorist organization? Thanks to Danielle Kramer for this excellent explanation. 🎥 TikTok -
1:35

As the right throw around accusations of liberal activists being ‘terrorists’. Aside from it being utter nonsense, this is all part of a carefully crafted narrative designed to not only stoke division, it is an inferred call to violent action. I can tell you without fear of contradiction that Charlie Kirk was a stochastic terrorist. Stochastic terrorism is a form of political violence instigated by hostile public rhetoric directed at a group or an individual. Unlike incitement to terrorism, stochastic terrorism is accomplished with indirect, vague or coded language, which grants the instigator plausible deniability for any associated violence. This is a textbook definition of the president, the vice president and every major right wing talking head. And there was I thinking the US does not negotiate with terrorists. Might that be because the government itself is a terrorist organization? Thanks to Danielle Kramer for this excellent explanation. 🎥 TikTok -

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

158,968 views • 10 months ago

A Circulated Video as Further Evidence of the Terrorist Nature of the Rapid Support Militia, and Why What Is Happening in Sudan Is Not a Civil War A recently circulated video has spread widely across Sudanese social media platforms, adding to an accumulating body of evidence documenting the violence and threats endured by Sudanese civilians for more than three years at the hands of the Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed), which is backed by the United Arab Emirates. The footage shows three individuals. One of them, wearing the uniform of the Rapid Support Militia, is speaking to a well-known figure within the militia known by the nickname “Yajooj and Majooj.” This exchange is marked by explicit threats directed at the city of Omdurman. It begins with repeated statements about their intention to “enter on asphalt,” accompanied by assertions that they will not back down, followed by talk of “returning” to Omdurman as they had entered it before. This rhetoric, with its direct threats against civilians, clearly reflects the terrorist mindset prevailing within the militia. Within this exchange, the speaker addresses the people of Omdurman directly, stating that they have heard that residents “have gained weight, put on fat, rebuilt the city, and made it flourish again.” This statement constitutes an explicit admission that the Rapid Support Militia had previously destroyed the city, and that subsequent recovery came as a result of civilians returning and rebuilding after liberation by the Sudanese Armed Forces. This admission is immediately weaponized within a provocative threat, through the claim that the militia withdrew and deliberately allowed residents to “grow their feathers,” in preparation for returning to cut those feathers. It is widely known that the Rapid Support Militia left Khartoum and Omdurman after suffering a crushing defeat at the hands of the Sudanese Armed Forces. Nevertheless, this rhetoric is used to terrorize civilians, by threatening return, destruction, and revenge, and by transforming a military withdrawal into a tool of psychological intimidation directed at the population. The discourse then escalates to an even more explicit and dangerous level, as Yajooj and Majooj openly embraces looting, stating, “If you call us shafshafa, then we are shafshafa.” The term shafshafa is a colloquial expression referring to thugs and highway robbers who carry out violent looting outside any legal framework. This is followed by a direct threat of total destruction, as he declares that they will leave nothing behind, not even the bricks of Omdurman itself, expressing a clear intent to physically erase the city. The threats extend further to include historical and religious landmarks, with talk of removing them and taking them to Nyala. This rhetoric reflects a consistent pattern in the militia’s behavior, in which looting is presented as a deliberate choice, destruction is framed as an objective, cities are treated as spoils of war, and civilians are addressed as targets for collective punishment. These statements align with what has been documented on the ground across Sudan. Omdurman, Khartoum, Wad Madani, and large parts of Darfur have been subjected to systematic looting, arson, killings, sexual violence, and campaigns of intimidation that directly targeted civilians. What is said in this video corresponds closely with survivor testimonies, journalistic investigations, satellite imagery, and reports by humanitarian organizations. This video, along with many others, confirms that what is happening in Sudan is not a “civil war” between equal parties. Rather, it is organized violence carried out by an armed terrorist militia against civilian populations. This violence would not have reached its scale or persistence without direct external support from the authorities in Abu Dhabi, which enabled the militia to continue killing, looting, and terrorizing civilians. This support has manifested through funding, logistical assistance, the provision of weapons and mobility, as well as political and media cover, effectively prolonging the violence, turning cities into zones of systematic abuse, and forcing civilians to pay the price for this empowerment. This context further underscores that there is no moral, legal, or factual equivalence between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Militia. The former is a state institution, while the latter is built on looting, intimidation, and destruction. For Sudanese people, this video is not shocking. However, it adds yet another documented piece of evidence to a long and well-established record of violations. #Sudan #RSFisTerroristOrganization #UAEKillsSudanesePeople #UAESponsorsTerrorism
0:51

A Circulated Video as Further Evidence of the Terrorist Nature of the Rapid Support Militia, and Why What Is Happening in Sudan Is Not a Civil War A recently circulated video has spread widely across Sudanese social media platforms, adding to an accumulating body of evidence documenting the violence and threats endured by Sudanese civilians for more than three years at the hands of the Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed), which is backed by the United Arab Emirates. The footage shows three individuals. One of them, wearing the uniform of the Rapid Support Militia, is speaking to a well-known figure within the militia known by the nickname “Yajooj and Majooj.” This exchange is marked by explicit threats directed at the city of Omdurman. It begins with repeated statements about their intention to “enter on asphalt,” accompanied by assertions that they will not back down, followed by talk of “returning” to Omdurman as they had entered it before. This rhetoric, with its direct threats against civilians, clearly reflects the terrorist mindset prevailing within the militia. Within this exchange, the speaker addresses the people of Omdurman directly, stating that they have heard that residents “have gained weight, put on fat, rebuilt the city, and made it flourish again.” This statement constitutes an explicit admission that the Rapid Support Militia had previously destroyed the city, and that subsequent recovery came as a result of civilians returning and rebuilding after liberation by the Sudanese Armed Forces. This admission is immediately weaponized within a provocative threat, through the claim that the militia withdrew and deliberately allowed residents to “grow their feathers,” in preparation for returning to cut those feathers. It is widely known that the Rapid Support Militia left Khartoum and Omdurman after suffering a crushing defeat at the hands of the Sudanese Armed Forces. Nevertheless, this rhetoric is used to terrorize civilians, by threatening return, destruction, and revenge, and by transforming a military withdrawal into a tool of psychological intimidation directed at the population. The discourse then escalates to an even more explicit and dangerous level, as Yajooj and Majooj openly embraces looting, stating, “If you call us shafshafa, then we are shafshafa.” The term shafshafa is a colloquial expression referring to thugs and highway robbers who carry out violent looting outside any legal framework. This is followed by a direct threat of total destruction, as he declares that they will leave nothing behind, not even the bricks of Omdurman itself, expressing a clear intent to physically erase the city. The threats extend further to include historical and religious landmarks, with talk of removing them and taking them to Nyala. This rhetoric reflects a consistent pattern in the militia’s behavior, in which looting is presented as a deliberate choice, destruction is framed as an objective, cities are treated as spoils of war, and civilians are addressed as targets for collective punishment. These statements align with what has been documented on the ground across Sudan. Omdurman, Khartoum, Wad Madani, and large parts of Darfur have been subjected to systematic looting, arson, killings, sexual violence, and campaigns of intimidation that directly targeted civilians. What is said in this video corresponds closely with survivor testimonies, journalistic investigations, satellite imagery, and reports by humanitarian organizations. This video, along with many others, confirms that what is happening in Sudan is not a “civil war” between equal parties. Rather, it is organized violence carried out by an armed terrorist militia against civilian populations. This violence would not have reached its scale or persistence without direct external support from the authorities in Abu Dhabi, which enabled the militia to continue killing, looting, and terrorizing civilians. This support has manifested through funding, logistical assistance, the provision of weapons and mobility, as well as political and media cover, effectively prolonging the violence, turning cities into zones of systematic abuse, and forcing civilians to pay the price for this empowerment. This context further underscores that there is no moral, legal, or factual equivalence between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Militia. The former is a state institution, while the latter is built on looting, intimidation, and destruction. For Sudanese people, this video is not shocking. However, it adds yet another documented piece of evidence to a long and well-established record of violations. #Sudan #RSFisTerroristOrganization #UAEKillsSudanesePeople #UAESponsorsTerrorism

Sudanese Echo

19,343 views • 6 months ago

🇵🇸 🇧🇦 “By the aforementioned convention on the prevention and punishment of genocide. A part of the world's political public closes its eyes and keeps silent about this extremely terrible fact. And there is no political interest or even economic interest motivated by the intention to exploit natural resources, such as oil or natural gas in that part of the Mediterranean, which could justify such a high level of genocidal violence against the local Palestinian population. Such violence is unjustified and unacceptable. Equally unacceptable is the silence and occasional approval that comes from various political circles around the world.”
0:47

🇵🇸 🇧🇦 “By the aforementioned convention on the prevention and punishment of genocide. A part of the world's political public closes its eyes and keeps silent about this extremely terrible fact. And there is no political interest or even economic interest motivated by the intention to exploit natural resources, such as oil or natural gas in that part of the Mediterranean, which could justify such a high level of genocidal violence against the local Palestinian population. Such violence is unjustified and unacceptable. Equally unacceptable is the silence and occasional approval that comes from various political circles around the world.”

State of Palestine

16,314 views • 10 months ago

⁩⁨How long will minorities continue to pay the price for politics of vengeance? --- The brutal assault on Shri Pallab Das, a Hindu and former Bangladesh Chhatra League activist from Mymensingh, has raised serious concerns about the safety of religious minorities and politically targeted violence in Bangladesh. According to the allegations, after a theft accusation against him could not be substantiated, he was attacked by a mob allegedly linked to local BNP activists, tied to a tree, and severely beaten. Every allegation of politically motivated violence and intimidation deserves a thorough, impartial investigation. No one should face violence because of their political beliefs or religious identity.⁩ #Bangladesh #HumanRights
2:14

⁩⁨How long will minorities continue to pay the price for politics of vengeance? --- The brutal assault on Shri Pallab Das, a Hindu and former Bangladesh Chhatra League activist from Mymensingh, has raised serious concerns about the safety of religious minorities and politically targeted violence in Bangladesh. According to the allegations, after a theft accusation against him could not be substantiated, he was attacked by a mob allegedly linked to local BNP activists, tied to a tree, and severely beaten. Every allegation of politically motivated violence and intimidation deserves a thorough, impartial investigation. No one should face violence because of their political beliefs or religious identity.⁩ #Bangladesh #HumanRights

Bangladesh Awami League

22,810 views • 14 days ago

🚨EXCLUSIVE: Rep. Jamie Raskin just revealed a chilling plan by the Trump administration - to ARREST and terrorize Democratic members of Congress to silence dissent. “They use violence and intimidation…for political repression.” This is not normal. This is FASCISM. 🧵
0:31

🚨EXCLUSIVE: Rep. Jamie Raskin just revealed a chilling plan by the Trump administration - to ARREST and terrorize Democratic members of Congress to silence dissent. “They use violence and intimidation…for political repression.” This is not normal. This is FASCISM. 🧵

CALL TO ACTIVISM

848,123 views • 1 year ago

INCITEMENT: From the age of 10, Tyler Robinson was steeped in a steady stream of hate and calls for political violence from Democrats and their allies in the drive-by media. During his formative years, he heard Democrat leaders urge him to act, to fight, and even to kill if necessary. This is why it is accurate to call the left the party of murder, they bear responsibility for the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
2:22

INCITEMENT: From the age of 10, Tyler Robinson was steeped in a steady stream of hate and calls for political violence from Democrats and their allies in the drive-by media. During his formative years, he heard Democrat leaders urge him to act, to fight, and even to kill if necessary. This is why it is accurate to call the left the party of murder, they bear responsibility for the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

@amuse

14,646 views • 10 months ago

STRAWMAN: THE NATURE OF THE CAGE John K. Webster Here is a deep dive documentary that took 18 months of research to complete this film. No stone is left unturned. By the end of this film you will be well informed of the legal fiction that has been used to manipulate our society. “A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight. If the alternative is to keep all just men in prison, or give up war and slavery, the State will not hesitate which to choose. If a thousand men were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. This is, in fact, the definition of a peaceable revolution, if any such is possible.” – Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience
2:06:27

STRAWMAN: THE NATURE OF THE CAGE John K. Webster Here is a deep dive documentary that took 18 months of research to complete this film. No stone is left unturned. By the end of this film you will be well informed of the legal fiction that has been used to manipulate our society. “A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight. If the alternative is to keep all just men in prison, or give up war and slavery, the State will not hesitate which to choose. If a thousand men were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. This is, in fact, the definition of a peaceable revolution, if any such is possible.” – Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience

Redpill Drifter

104,419 views • 2 years ago

“Right now, this is as close as you’re going to get to the White House if you’re a member of the public”: Matt Viser reports from outside the White House, where fortifications are growing in tandem with the threat of political violence.
1:53

“Right now, this is as close as you’re going to get to the White House if you’re a member of the public”: Matt Viser reports from outside the White House, where fortifications are growing in tandem with the threat of political violence.

The Atlantic

10,987 views • 2 months ago

My heart goes out to Charlie Kirk's family. This is a tragic shooting and from all appearances, it is an act of political violence. Political violence is on the rise and it is a sign of crisis and weakness in a democracy. I condemn all forms of political violence. We all must take responsibility for working to end it, to secure our democracy and to promote peace and strength in our nation and beyond.
0:49

My heart goes out to Charlie Kirk's family. This is a tragic shooting and from all appearances, it is an act of political violence. Political violence is on the rise and it is a sign of crisis and weakness in a democracy. I condemn all forms of political violence. We all must take responsibility for working to end it, to secure our democracy and to promote peace and strength in our nation and beyond.

Sen. Cory Booker

202,848 views • 10 months ago

The recent assault on Professor Lovemore Madhuku represents a profoundly troubling incident that underscores a disturbing trend in our society. It is imperative that the Zimbabwe Republic Police (ZRP) take decisive action to ensure that those responsible are held accountable. Such an act of violence is an affront to civil discourse and has no place in contemporary society, where robust debate should flourish without the specter of intimidation. It is my firm belief that this type of behavior is indefensible, and it is incumbent upon the ruling party to denounce such actions unequivocally, as the optics of silence would not serve them well. We must recognize our evolution as a mature democracy, and it is crucial that we reject any behavior that threatens the foundations of open dialogue and intellectual exchange.
3:05

The recent assault on Professor Lovemore Madhuku represents a profoundly troubling incident that underscores a disturbing trend in our society. It is imperative that the Zimbabwe Republic Police (ZRP) take decisive action to ensure that those responsible are held accountable. Such an act of violence is an affront to civil discourse and has no place in contemporary society, where robust debate should flourish without the specter of intimidation. It is my firm belief that this type of behavior is indefensible, and it is incumbent upon the ruling party to denounce such actions unequivocally, as the optics of silence would not serve them well. We must recognize our evolution as a mature democracy, and it is crucial that we reject any behavior that threatens the foundations of open dialogue and intellectual exchange.

Sabhuku Temba P. Mliswa

28,753 views • 5 months ago

The hacking of One India, a major regional network, by a group calling themselves True Muslim Afghans is a significant development in the region. By displaying the original Afghan flag, these individuals are sending a direct and public message to the leadership in Kabul. It appears a segment of the Afghan population is growing increasingly vocal against the current administration's diplomatic engagements with the Indian government. This incident suggests a deep-seated rejection of any alignment with the Modi administration, framed by the hackers as a defense of their national and religious identity. The use of the genuine Afghan flag during the breach serves as a symbolic revolt against the Taliban's authority. This act signals that many Afghans see through the current regime's rhetoric, viewing their shift toward India as a betrayal of the values they claim to uphold.
1:00

The hacking of One India, a major regional network, by a group calling themselves True Muslim Afghans is a significant development in the region. By displaying the original Afghan flag, these individuals are sending a direct and public message to the leadership in Kabul. It appears a segment of the Afghan population is growing increasingly vocal against the current administration's diplomatic engagements with the Indian government. This incident suggests a deep-seated rejection of any alignment with the Modi administration, framed by the hackers as a defense of their national and religious identity. The use of the genuine Afghan flag during the breach serves as a symbolic revolt against the Taliban's authority. This act signals that many Afghans see through the current regime's rhetoric, viewing their shift toward India as a betrayal of the values they claim to uphold.

Wajahat Kazmi

17,630 views • 3 months ago