Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

This tiny bird doesn’t build its nest. It sews it. The Common Tailorbird picks a living leaf still attached to the plant, folds the edges together, then uses its needle-sharp beak to punch tiny holes along the seam. Then it starts stitching. It pulls spider silk and plant fibers...

14,004 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

7 Yorum

Oldschool 🇳🇱 profil fotoğrafı
Oldschool 🇳🇱3 gün önce

AI as fuck. I can see the magical appearance of silk 9 seconds in the video.

GasMan profil fotoğrafı
GasMan3 gün önce

That bird is dope.

Peanut the Shepherd profil fotoğrafı
Peanut the Shepherd3 gün önce

It can use cotton fiber too for stitching

Danielle Kaeser profil fotoğrafı
Danielle Kaeser3 gün önce

I’m telling you, GOD IS THE MASTER CREATOR!!! Every single living creature, including HUMANS, has a distinct characteristic and unique purpose on His planet. Of COURSE Noah’s Ark has been found. Another INDISPUTABLE FACT of His Wonders. Humans are “fearfully and wonderfully MADE.”God made every single creature, slithering and otherwise to come to the Ark in order that they would be saved and reproduce FOR US!!! Repent people. Jesus IS COMING!! And I for one AM SO FREAKING READY!!!!✝️🙏🏻🇺🇸♥️

K0nd1s profil fotoğrafı
K0nd1s3 gün önce

AI clickbait. Very annoying.

Houarno profil fotoğrafı
Houarno3 gün önce

@EmmaM56343533

Ariane Page profil fotoğrafı
Ariane Page2 gün önce

Before saying it is AI, why don’t you ask Grok ? This is true.

Benzer Videolar

After the floodwaters began to disappear, a man noticed a tiny creature swimming in a pool of water left behind. He gently picked it up, and the little bird immediately started crying out. At first, he couldn’t even tell what kind of bird it was. Its body had unusual black and yellow markings, and its feet had strange webbed toes that almost looked like little leaves. The man tried putting it back in the water, but every time he did, the tiny bird swam straight back to his hand. Realizing it probably wouldn’t survive alone without its mother, he decided to take it home. He made a warm little nest out of a towel and gave the hungry bird small pieces of shrimp. As it grew stronger, he even filled a bucket with water so it could practice swimming, diving, and catching fish. Day by day, the little bird grew. Soon, it was flying around the house, and whenever it made a perfect landing, it got a fish as a reward. Eventually, its feathers had fully grown, and the man knew it was time to let it go. He took the bird back to the water and watched as it took off, flying low across the surface until it disappeared into the distance. But their story wasn’t over. The very next day, the man returned to the river and found the same little bird tangled in an abandoned fishing net. It was completely exhausted and barely moving. He quickly picked it up and carefully cut away every piece of fishing line. For a moment, he wasn’t sure the little bird was going to survive. When he finally placed it back in the water, it simply floated there without moving. Then suddenly… its little webbed feet started paddling. Within seconds, it was swimming away as fast as it could, heading back toward the open water. After everything this little survivor went through, it still refused to give up. But can you guess what kind of bird it is?

Rescue Hearts

337,207 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Culture is genetic because behavior is genetic. This beaver never saw a dam in its life. No beavers or anything else ever taught it to build a dam. It wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Many beavers together build a big dam. That is beaver culture. Humans are not different. Nothing is different. This is what life is. This is how life works. Your body is your mind. A caterpillar wants to build a chrysalis. A bee wants to build a hive. A lion wants to build a pride. You are not special. You are not above your nature. you are INSIDE of it. The thoughts that we think are genetic thoughts. The crimes we commit are genetic crimes. The art we create is genetic art. Just like this beaver, you can give the animal different sticks and it will build a different dam, but it will always build a dam. And you can give humans different "education," but the human will always use it to do what its genes tell it to do. This is the first big answer that you need. This is the biggest piece of the puzzle. This is how to understand people 90% of the way. You just... notice what they do, and get out of the way, and watch them do it. And if they need sticks, you give them sticks. And if you don't like what they do, you have to get away from them. You cannot train dam-building into them or out of them any more than you can with a beaver. A beaver wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Whatever you see people build, that's what they wanted to build from the sticks they got in the river they were in. Stop pretending you can change it.

hoe_math = PsychoMath

1,191,649 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

WHAT IS AN AI "SOFTWARE FACTORY" AND IS IT HYPE (31 MINUTE BREAKDOWN) I think it's a silly name for a genuinely USEFUL idea! A software factory is 5-6 markdown files that sit next to your code and tell your agents how you like to work, so you can build high quality apps 24/7. It's going viral because AI coding has a trust problem. The model can build the feature, but with no structure around it you end up babysitting the agent, wondering what changed and hoping it didn't break something important. So you build with agents the same way a factory builds physical products! 1. Each feature gets its own station, which in software means its own branch, so multiple agents can work at the same time without stepping on each other. 2. The build station gives the agent rules for how to write the code, because "it works" is very different from "a developer could open this repo next month and understand what happened." 3. The proof station makes the agent show evidence. Screenshots, videos, speed numbers, before-and-after states. It has to prove the thing works instead of saying it works. 4. The review station runs the work through a code review agent, and if it doesn't clear the bar, it goes back through the line. 5. Then you show up at the end to merge. For a 100+ years people have run production this way, and it worked because the structure is good. The full episode on what’s a software factory is NOW live on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 with the wonderful Micky Watch: So is it hype?!? I don't think it is, because of what it does to your output! WITHOUT a factory, you build ONE feature at a time and you're the bottleneck at every step, prompting, checking the diff, testing it yourself, hoping nothing else broke (spoiler alert it often does). WITH a factory, EACH feature runs in its own isolated copy of the app, so you can have 10+ of them going at once, and each agent has to prove its own work and pass a code review before it ever reaches you. Instead of supervising the work, you're APPROVING finished work that already has evidence attached. REALLY interesting to see how work with agents is evolving to be….well, similar to working with people!

GREG ISENBERG

30,787 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce

"I don't add bananas to my smoothies because they contain polyphenol oxidase, an enzyme that can break down polyphenols." A banana. A threat. Because it might, in the blender, slightly dent the level of a plant compound you were only chasing because these same people spent a decade insisting plant compounds are the secret to eternal life. There's a turf war in your smoothie and you're losing. This is the entire grift. They have to build these fragile little cathedrals of biochemistry, enzyme by enzyme, because it's the only way to make a leaf sound like a miracle. Chop the broccoli and wait forty minutes to "activate the sulforaphane." Steam it, don't boil it. Add this, but never with that. It's not eating, it's a chemistry exam, and if it doesn't work, well, you must have blended the banana wrong. That's the tell. A food that actually worked wouldn't need a user manual and fourteen disclaimers. Now aim all that frantic energy at beef. Nothing happens. There's nothing to build. No enzyme window, no activation ritual, no "don't pair it with." You cook it, you eat it, and your body has known exactly what to do with it for two million years. Beef doesn't need a health claim. It puts its record on the table. What built the brain. What you actually absorb from a steak versus what you wave goodbye to from kale. The complete protein, the iron, the B12, all of it in a form that needs no unlocking. No cathedral. No banana police. Just food. Do the sum.

Sama Hoole

51,080 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨 SOMETHING STRANGE IS HAPPENING TO THE MOON — AND THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO NOTICE A woman gets on camera and says this isn’t a one-time thing. She saw it last month, the moon looked completely off, like the orientation made no sense, but she brushed it off and kept it moving. Now it’s happening again. Same exact look. So this time she actually checks, pulls up NASA charts for her exact location and shows what the moon is supposed to look like… and what she’s seeing doesn’t match it, not even close. The charts show it side to side, but what everyone actually saw was a flipped moon, straight up upside down, like something changed and everyone’s acting like it didn’t. Then she calls people across the country to verify it, and they come back saying the same thing. It looks upside down to them too, which is where this stops being “just her” and starts feeling like the same exact thing showing up in multiple places at the same time. And it’s not just her, people all over social media are saying the same thing: "Something isn't right." And this is where it stops making any sense. She says if the moon is a crescent, you’re only supposed to see the lit part… so why can she still see the entire outline of it, faint but clearly there, like the shadow isn’t even doing what it’s supposed to do? And she’s already calling it out before anyone can spin it: don’t say it’s lighting, don’t say it’s angle, don’t say it’s photoshopped, because she checked the charts, showed the receipts, and had other people confirm it. So now you’ve got the same “flip,” the same upside down moon, same visibility issue, second month in a row, multiple locations… and it still doesn’t match what we’re being shown. She ignored it once. Now it’s back again. So what exactly are we looking at… and why does it feel like we’re not supposed to question it?

HustleBitch

731,335 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce