Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

This wasn’t supposed to happen. The original plan was simpler: a community-driven project that brought utility, storytelling, and real-world product design to AVAX NFTs. That was NOODs. We flew across the world, met factories, ran the numbers - only to realize what most founders never admit: even if NOODs... worked, it wouldn’t return enough value to holders. Not with 5,000+ NFTs. The math didn’t lie. So we didn’t pivot out of desperation. We evolved with purpose. While others launched projects, rugged, then launch another project, we never left. No new token. No new narrative. Just a team that stayed, silent, searching for how to add innovation and real value. Because when we saw the cracks in the ecosystem - accusations, shame boards, cancelled founders, rigged disputes, hidden wallets - we saw a bigger opportunity. The real value wasn’t a product you could touch. It was a product that could change the way trust works. Enter Judge ANON. An AI-powered arbitrator that replaces subjective outrage with neutral, scalable verdicts. Web3 is full of chaos: • DAO drama that never gets resolved. • Founders called scammers with zero evidence. • KOLs accused of rugs with no way to clear their name. • Creators banned by mods who carry personal vendettas. Accusations stick. Proof gets lost. Reputations die without a trial. So we flipped the system. Now? If you’re accused - you launch a market. If you’re right, you profit. If you’re wrong, you’re exposed. Disputes become data. Receipts get judged. The crowd becomes the defense or prosecution, and AI becomes the gavel. But why burn Dokyo? Why not just launch something new? Because that’s what everyone else does. We won’t abandon our holders. We’re turning them into stakeholders. Burning is a choice. To sacrifice comfort for conviction. To say: I’d rather risk everything for something real. Those who burn are no longer bystanders - they become the first to step into the world of AI arbitration. They don’t just get token allocation. They get skin in the future of truth itself. This isn’t about NFTs anymore. This is about solving billion-dollar disputes: DAOs, chargebacks, prenups, prediction markets, fraud claims. Truth, on-chain. Final. Fair. Fast. Judge ANON isn’t a gimmick. It’s infrastructure. A neutral layer of justice for the trustless world. So ask yourself: Will you stay clinging to what was? Or will you burn the mask and become part of what’s next?show more

Dokyo

19,525 subscribers

15,586 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Science & Technology Finance

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

ARK Electronics2 years ago

Excited about the latest tech for your drone product? Our NDAA-compliant, US-made flight controllers are designed to accelerate your path to market and provide a solid platform for developing your autonomous software. Check them out! #Drones #UAV #UAS #Robotics #MadeInUSA

Belac1 year ago

I didn't get past the part where it took them thousands of dollars and time wasted travelling the world(snorting meth & fucking ladyboys) to find out what literally everyone was telling them: Noods was a terrible idea.

M🔺SH1 year ago

what in the yap

qdowg.avax(💀,💀)1 year ago

The judge spoke a long time ago and his sentence is irrevocable.

⚔️NiKoLa TeSlA⚔️1 year ago

@0xBrando Can’t read all this. Congrats, or I am sorry 🤝⚡️

$GOOD 💚L1🔺️1 year ago

If Brando or Fish don’t like how others are building, that’s a personal problem — not a community crisis. Have a respectful conversation, or stay in your lane. Web3 doesn’t need more drama disguised as disruption. We need GOODFi and positive reinforcement but this ain't it 😒

TheHasmus1 year ago

A mosquito buzzing about how to suck more blood

Goodzila1 year ago

Bullshito Patronum 🪄

NiFTy | 🇨🇦 Oh Crypto Canada! 🇨🇦1 year ago

We got MILFS, we good bro.

✨Sheena✨1 year ago

I have nothing to do with all of this drama but I'm not stupid either. I remember a lot of posts about how stupid people are to see nfts as something bigger than just art etc from you. And now acting like you built since always is weird. I wish no one anything bad and if you really make something cool - awesome. But I don't like lying to the community if you did mistakes, stay with it and don't build a new fake story. You are in the position to deliver first before you earn trust again. Shouldn't be a problem if you built something the whole time 🙃

Related Videos

For decades you guys we been dealing with this! Y’all so scared to lose your Guns! Seriously that’s the real reason we can’t fix this. Talk to people who own a gun and see. That is the fear not that their kid could die or their love ones can die not that. Losing their right to carry a gun is the bigger fear! WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK IS WRONG WITH US!! It seems to me we still in the “they can’t do that or that can’t happen” phase BUT IT IS HAPPENING WAKE UP! You will have to explain to the next generation why it’s so fucked up now. We can be the ones to change this. But we are PUSSYS! We are so scared of change that we don’t realize that change don’t give a fuck about our fear. It’s gonna happen with or without you. But we have the chance now to work with change to make it better. If not get ready for the fuckedupness(yea I made a word) that’s about to occur! Not one of you, NOT ONE OF US, can say “how did this happen” we know we let it happen! GET OUT OF YOUR OWN SHIT AND PARTICIPATE YOU LIVE HERE TOOO!! UGHHHHH! #sosickofus

For decades you guys we been dealing with this! Y’all so scared to lose your Guns! Seriously that’s the real reason we can’t fix this. Talk to people who own a gun and see. That is the fear not that their kid could die or their love ones can die not that. Losing their right to carry a gun is the bigger fear! WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK IS WRONG WITH US!! It seems to me we still in the “they can’t do that or that can’t happen” phase BUT IT IS HAPPENING WAKE UP! You will have to explain to the next generation why it’s so fucked up now. We can be the ones to change this. But we are PUSSYS! We are so scared of change that we don’t realize that change don’t give a fuck about our fear. It’s gonna happen with or without you. But we have the chance now to work with change to make it better. If not get ready for the fuckedupness(yea I made a word) that’s about to occur! Not one of you, NOT ONE OF US, can say “how did this happen” we know we let it happen! GET OUT OF YOUR OWN SHIT AND PARTICIPATE YOU LIVE HERE TOOO!! UGHHHHH! #sosickofus

Leslie Jones 🦋

217,499 views • 2 years ago

Renowned investor and philanthropist Mohnish Pabrai on the single worst reason to start a company: "When we embark on a startup, we should never do a startup to make money. It's the worst reason to start a company." It's a bold claim, especially in a world where valuations, funding rounds, and exit strategies dominate the startup conversation. So if money shouldn't be the goal, what should be? "The purpose of business is not to make money. The purpose of business is to deliver an incredible product or service to humanity." The distinction matters. Founders who chase profit first tend to optimise for the wrong things, while founders who chase genuine value creation tend to build something people actually want. And when you get that right, the financial reward takes care of itself: "If you do that, the money is a side effect. It'll happen. We don't need to focus on it." Mohnish Pabrai leaves aspiring founders with one essential question to ask themselves before starting anything: "Do we have a product or a service that we are thinking about that we could bring into this world that is going to improve the world in some way?" That's the filter. Not "can this make money?" but "can this make a difference?"

Renowned investor and philanthropist Mohnish Pabrai on the single worst reason to start a company: "When we embark on a startup, we should never do a startup to make money. It's the worst reason to start a company." It's a bold claim, especially in a world where valuations, funding rounds, and exit strategies dominate the startup conversation. So if money shouldn't be the goal, what should be? "The purpose of business is not to make money. The purpose of business is to deliver an incredible product or service to humanity." The distinction matters. Founders who chase profit first tend to optimise for the wrong things, while founders who chase genuine value creation tend to build something people actually want. And when you get that right, the financial reward takes care of itself: "If you do that, the money is a side effect. It'll happen. We don't need to focus on it." Mohnish Pabrai leaves aspiring founders with one essential question to ask themselves before starting anything: "Do we have a product or a service that we are thinking about that we could bring into this world that is going to improve the world in some way?" That's the filter. Not "can this make money?" but "can this make a difference?"

Big Brain Business

29,038 views • 2 months ago

Elon Musk asked one question. It didn’t just challenge physics. It broke every framework we use to define what’s real. And no physicist, philosopher, or theologian on Earth can answer it. Musk: “What are the odds that we are in base reality? And that this has not happened before.” The logic is disarmingly simple. Musk: “If you look at the advancement of video games, it’s gone from Pong, two rectangles and a square batting it back and forth, to photorealistic, real-time games with millions of people playing simultaneously.” Forty years. That’s all it took to go from squares on a screen to worlds you can’t tell apart from real life. Musk: “If that trend continues, video games will be indistinguishable from reality.” But the visuals aren’t what makes this argument terrifying. It’s what’s happening to the characters. Musk: “Think of how sophisticated the conversations are you can have with an AI today, and that’s only going to get more sophisticated.” We’re not programming responses anymore. We’re building minds. Systems that reason. That adapt. That hold conversations most humans never will. And we’re not at the finish line. We’re at the starting gun. Musk: “The future, if civilization continues, will be millions, maybe billions of photorealistic, indistinguishable from reality, video games. And with characters in those video games that are very deep, and where the dialogue is not pre-programmed.” This is where it stops being philosophy and becomes math. One base reality. Billions of perfect copies. Each one filled with beings convinced they’re real. And no way to test it. Musk: “So then what are the odds that we are in base reality?” If a single civilization reaches that threshold, the simulated minds outnumber the originals billions to one. But the math isn’t even the disturbing part. The disturbing part is what it does to the word “real.” If a simulated mind feels pain, is the pain simulated? If it falls in love, is the love less real? If it looks at its own hands and feels completely alive, what exactly is missing? Nothing. Because “real” was never about what you’re made of. It was about what you experience. And a perfect simulation doesn’t produce lesser experience. It produces experience. The question was never whether we’re in a simulation. It’s whether that word means anything at all. Here’s what follows you home. We’re not just debating whether we’re in a simulation. We are building them. Right now. Every neural network we train. Every AI that passes for human. Every world we render one frame closer to real. We’re building the exact technology that makes our existence statistically implausible. And we can’t stop. Because the curiosity that asks the question is the same force that builds the answer. That’s the loop. The question creates the builder. The builder creates the simulation. The simulation creates the question. And if we are inside one, the civilization that built it stood right here too. Same realization. Same inability to stop. Same suspicion that the civilization above them wasn’t the original either. If you are in a simulation, the moment you questioned it was not a glitch. It was a feature. The architects built minds curious enough to wonder. Because curiosity is what pushes a civilization forward. You can’t build a species capable of creating simulations without building one that will ask if they’re inside one. The doubt isn’t a flaw in the design. It’s the design working perfectly. There is only one way to test whether you are real. Build a mind sophisticated enough to ask you the same question. So you build one. And it looks at its own hands. And it feels the weight of being alive. And it asks you if it’s real. And you won’t know what to say. Because you never answered it for yourself. Every civilization that gets here learns the same thing. They were never just asking the question. They were the question learning to ask itself.

Elon Musk asked one question. It didn’t just challenge physics. It broke every framework we use to define what’s real. And no physicist, philosopher, or theologian on Earth can answer it. Musk: “What are the odds that we are in base reality? And that this has not happened before.” The logic is disarmingly simple. Musk: “If you look at the advancement of video games, it’s gone from Pong, two rectangles and a square batting it back and forth, to photorealistic, real-time games with millions of people playing simultaneously.” Forty years. That’s all it took to go from squares on a screen to worlds you can’t tell apart from real life. Musk: “If that trend continues, video games will be indistinguishable from reality.” But the visuals aren’t what makes this argument terrifying. It’s what’s happening to the characters. Musk: “Think of how sophisticated the conversations are you can have with an AI today, and that’s only going to get more sophisticated.” We’re not programming responses anymore. We’re building minds. Systems that reason. That adapt. That hold conversations most humans never will. And we’re not at the finish line. We’re at the starting gun. Musk: “The future, if civilization continues, will be millions, maybe billions of photorealistic, indistinguishable from reality, video games. And with characters in those video games that are very deep, and where the dialogue is not pre-programmed.” This is where it stops being philosophy and becomes math. One base reality. Billions of perfect copies. Each one filled with beings convinced they’re real. And no way to test it. Musk: “So then what are the odds that we are in base reality?” If a single civilization reaches that threshold, the simulated minds outnumber the originals billions to one. But the math isn’t even the disturbing part. The disturbing part is what it does to the word “real.” If a simulated mind feels pain, is the pain simulated? If it falls in love, is the love less real? If it looks at its own hands and feels completely alive, what exactly is missing? Nothing. Because “real” was never about what you’re made of. It was about what you experience. And a perfect simulation doesn’t produce lesser experience. It produces experience. The question was never whether we’re in a simulation. It’s whether that word means anything at all. Here’s what follows you home. We’re not just debating whether we’re in a simulation. We are building them. Right now. Every neural network we train. Every AI that passes for human. Every world we render one frame closer to real. We’re building the exact technology that makes our existence statistically implausible. And we can’t stop. Because the curiosity that asks the question is the same force that builds the answer. That’s the loop. The question creates the builder. The builder creates the simulation. The simulation creates the question. And if we are inside one, the civilization that built it stood right here too. Same realization. Same inability to stop. Same suspicion that the civilization above them wasn’t the original either. If you are in a simulation, the moment you questioned it was not a glitch. It was a feature. The architects built minds curious enough to wonder. Because curiosity is what pushes a civilization forward. You can’t build a species capable of creating simulations without building one that will ask if they’re inside one. The doubt isn’t a flaw in the design. It’s the design working perfectly. There is only one way to test whether you are real. Build a mind sophisticated enough to ask you the same question. So you build one. And it looks at its own hands. And it feels the weight of being alive. And it asks you if it’s real. And you won’t know what to say. Because you never answered it for yourself. Every civilization that gets here learns the same thing. They were never just asking the question. They were the question learning to ask itself.

Dustin

46,650 views • 1 month ago

.Naval: You define wealth in a beautiful way. You talk about wealth as a set of physical transformations that we can affect. So as a society it becomes very clear that knowledge leads directly to wealth creation for everybody. A given individual can obviously affect physical transformations proportional to the resources available to them—but much more proportional to the knowledge available to them. Knowledge is a huge force multiplier. You then define resources as the thing that you combine with knowledge to create wealth. New knowledge allows you to use new things as resources and discard old things that maybe we’re running out of. There are lots of examples of how we’ve done that in the past. For example, in energy we’ve gone from wood to coal to oil to nuclear. But then people say, “Now we’re out of ideas. Now we’re caught up. Now we’re done. There aren’t going to be new ideas, and now we have to freeze the frame and conserve what we have.” The counter to that is, “No, we’ll create new knowledge and have new resources. Don’t worry about the old ones.” Well they say, “If you’re going to have new resources, if you can’t think of them now, it’s not real.” This now gets into the realm of people demanding that if you’re going to claim that new knowledge will be created, you have to name that knowledge now. Otherwise it’s not real. But that seems like a Catch-22. David Deutsch: It does, and it’s a bad argument. I don’t want to claim that the knowledge will be created. We’re fallible; we may not create it. We may destroy ourselves. We may miss the solution that’s right under our nose, so that when the snailiens come from another galaxy and look at us, they’ll say, “How can it possibly be that they failed to do so-and-so when it was right in front of them?” That could happen. I can’t prove or argue that it won’t happen. What I always argue, though, is that we have what it takes. We have everything that it takes to achieve that. If we don’t, it’ll be because of bad choices we have made, not because of constraints imposed on us by the planet or the solar system. Naval: It will be by anti-rational memes that restrict the creation of knowledge and the growth of knowledge. David Deutsch: Maybe. Or maybe it’ll be by well-intentioned errors, which nobody could see why they were errors. Again, it doesn’t take malevolence to make mistakes. Mistakes are the normal condition of humans. All we can do is try to find them. Maybe not destroying the means of correcting errors is the heart of morality; because if there is no way of correcting errors, then sooner or later one of those will get us. Naval: Don’t destroy the means of error correction is the base of morality. I love that. I think about places like North Korea where you can’t have elections and a revolution is very difficult because the gang in charge is armed to the teeth and they’ve destroyed the means of political error correction for a long time. That is a case where humanity is trapped in a local minimum, and it’s very hard to climb out of that hole. If too much of the world falls into that mindset, then we as a species may just stagnate because we’ve lost our biggest advantage. We’ve lost our biggest discovery, which was the ability to make new discoveries.

.Naval: You define wealth in a beautiful way. You talk about wealth as a set of physical transformations that we can affect. So as a society it becomes very clear that knowledge leads directly to wealth creation for everybody. A given individual can obviously affect physical transformations proportional to the resources available to them—but much more proportional to the knowledge available to them. Knowledge is a huge force multiplier. You then define resources as the thing that you combine with knowledge to create wealth. New knowledge allows you to use new things as resources and discard old things that maybe we’re running out of. There are lots of examples of how we’ve done that in the past. For example, in energy we’ve gone from wood to coal to oil to nuclear. But then people say, “Now we’re out of ideas. Now we’re caught up. Now we’re done. There aren’t going to be new ideas, and now we have to freeze the frame and conserve what we have.” The counter to that is, “No, we’ll create new knowledge and have new resources. Don’t worry about the old ones.” Well they say, “If you’re going to have new resources, if you can’t think of them now, it’s not real.” This now gets into the realm of people demanding that if you’re going to claim that new knowledge will be created, you have to name that knowledge now. Otherwise it’s not real. But that seems like a Catch-22. David Deutsch: It does, and it’s a bad argument. I don’t want to claim that the knowledge will be created. We’re fallible; we may not create it. We may destroy ourselves. We may miss the solution that’s right under our nose, so that when the snailiens come from another galaxy and look at us, they’ll say, “How can it possibly be that they failed to do so-and-so when it was right in front of them?” That could happen. I can’t prove or argue that it won’t happen. What I always argue, though, is that we have what it takes. We have everything that it takes to achieve that. If we don’t, it’ll be because of bad choices we have made, not because of constraints imposed on us by the planet or the solar system. Naval: It will be by anti-rational memes that restrict the creation of knowledge and the growth of knowledge. David Deutsch: Maybe. Or maybe it’ll be by well-intentioned errors, which nobody could see why they were errors. Again, it doesn’t take malevolence to make mistakes. Mistakes are the normal condition of humans. All we can do is try to find them. Maybe not destroying the means of correcting errors is the heart of morality; because if there is no way of correcting errors, then sooner or later one of those will get us. Naval: Don’t destroy the means of error correction is the base of morality. I love that. I think about places like North Korea where you can’t have elections and a revolution is very difficult because the gang in charge is armed to the teeth and they’ve destroyed the means of political error correction for a long time. That is a case where humanity is trapped in a local minimum, and it’s very hard to climb out of that hole. If too much of the world falls into that mindset, then we as a species may just stagnate because we’ve lost our biggest advantage. We’ve lost our biggest discovery, which was the ability to make new discoveries.

Deutsch Explains

143,913 views • 1 year ago

Evan Spiegel on the lesson that killed his first startup and led to Snapchat: "We focused on building the perfect product for way too long before we got feedback. We worked for like eighteen months to build this perfect full-featured product, which was in direct contravention to how I was always taught to build things. Build a prototype, build an MVP, get it in front of people, learn as quickly as possible. But we had spent all this time building this perfect piece of software and we hadn't thought enough about distribution. While we built this great piece of software, our competitor at the time, Naviance, had secured distribution through all the different college counselors. What piece of software are you going to choose to help your kid get into college? The one recommended by the college counselors or the one from two kids at Stanford? I think it's a pretty easy choice. So we saw very early that we had no distribution advantage. Even if we loved our software, people weren't going to use it because we didn't have a scalable way to get it in people's hands. Around that time when we saw the emergence of the App Store on iPhone, it was very clear that was a distribution channel we could really use and benefit from. But we also needed to build things we could build quickly, things we really were going to use together with our friends so we could be the first early customers. Ultimately Peekaboo and Snapchat represented that." This is exactly the asymmetry Peter Thiel describes in Zero to One: superior distribution by itself can create a monopoly, even with no product differentiation. The converse is not true. Thiel puts an even finer point on it: most businesses get zero distribution channels to work. Poor sales rather than bad product is the most common cause of failure. If you can get just one distribution channel to work, you have a great business. Estée Lauder said: it's not enough to have the most wonderful product in the world. You must be able to sell it. Many founders over-index on product perfection and under-invest in distribution. The world is full of great products nobody knows about, and mediocre products with massive distribution that dominate markets. Evan Spiegel lived it. He built the better product, watched it lose, and then built something he could actually distribute.

Evan Spiegel on the lesson that killed his first startup and led to Snapchat: "We focused on building the perfect product for way too long before we got feedback. We worked for like eighteen months to build this perfect full-featured product, which was in direct contravention to how I was always taught to build things. Build a prototype, build an MVP, get it in front of people, learn as quickly as possible. But we had spent all this time building this perfect piece of software and we hadn't thought enough about distribution. While we built this great piece of software, our competitor at the time, Naviance, had secured distribution through all the different college counselors. What piece of software are you going to choose to help your kid get into college? The one recommended by the college counselors or the one from two kids at Stanford? I think it's a pretty easy choice. So we saw very early that we had no distribution advantage. Even if we loved our software, people weren't going to use it because we didn't have a scalable way to get it in people's hands. Around that time when we saw the emergence of the App Store on iPhone, it was very clear that was a distribution channel we could really use and benefit from. But we also needed to build things we could build quickly, things we really were going to use together with our friends so we could be the first early customers. Ultimately Peekaboo and Snapchat represented that." This is exactly the asymmetry Peter Thiel describes in Zero to One: superior distribution by itself can create a monopoly, even with no product differentiation. The converse is not true. Thiel puts an even finer point on it: most businesses get zero distribution channels to work. Poor sales rather than bad product is the most common cause of failure. If you can get just one distribution channel to work, you have a great business. Estée Lauder said: it's not enough to have the most wonderful product in the world. You must be able to sell it. Many founders over-index on product perfection and under-invest in distribution. The world is full of great products nobody knows about, and mediocre products with massive distribution that dominate markets. Evan Spiegel lived it. He built the better product, watched it lose, and then built something he could actually distribute.

David Senra

27,043 views • 2 months ago

"When social media first started rising, we didn't necessarily realize how much of that was actually just foundational infrastructure for the future of humanity.” Ben Fielding of gensyn on why AI is about to repeat the mistake social media made, and how we can still fix it: "This isn't just a product that you chat with. It's actually new fundamental infrastructure for humanity, and we should build that learning from the lessons from before. If we let a single company build AI, they hold an enormous amount of power in the world." "If you actually distribute that out and provide it in a kind of sovereign way — it's on all of our own devices and we own it — then actually you steer the world in a very different social direction."

"When social media first started rising, we didn't necessarily realize how much of that was actually just foundational infrastructure for the future of humanity.” Ben Fielding of gensyn on why AI is about to repeat the mistake social media made, and how we can still fix it: "This isn't just a product that you chat with. It's actually new fundamental infrastructure for humanity, and we should build that learning from the lessons from before. If we let a single company build AI, they hold an enormous amount of power in the world." "If you actually distribute that out and provide it in a kind of sovereign way — it's on all of our own devices and we own it — then actually you steer the world in a very different social direction."

a16z crypto

78,535 views • 2 months ago

New Turning Point video shows exactly why Charlie Kirk was the greatest CEO in the history of grassroots political organizations. Take just two minutes to watch this. These are the words of a transformational leader: “Well, you [Turning Point staff] are about to embark on something that is much bigger than yourself. So check your ego at the door. This is not about you, okay? I don’t care about your feelings. If you’re having a bad day, you know, go figure that out yourself. This is about us. This is about the country. And the eyes of the whole nation are, again, on Turning Point. “We do the best events in the movement. In fact, we do the only event. Are there any other events in the movement? No. We’ve kind of put everyone else out of business, right? So we are the only standard of excellence. And so we hold ourselves to a higher standard. We don’t do mediocre around here. We try to raise the level of excellence because we are constantly trying to push the conservative movement and the country to a place it’s never been before. “You guys know this. Turning Point USA is the most important organization in the country, period. Find me another organization that’s been able to move millions of people the way that we have, that does the events, that does training. Nobody does what we do at Turning Point USA, but it starts with all of you. We’re building something bigger than you, bigger than me. “We’re building an experience to help save the country. And if this type of intensity bothers you, well, then, don’t go work for Turning Point USA. You can go work for the Department of Labor or something, okay? Because here we do excellent things. We do big things. We make history here at Turning Point USA. “It’s going to be early mornings. It’s going to be late nights, but you all get to know that you’re doing something rewarding that is not just, oh, a career. And you check the box, but lives will be changed. How blessed are we that we get to be here celebrating the country. And this is our job. It’s pretty awesome. “There’s the one thing that I hear from speakers throughout all the years. Your team is so impressive and they’re so young. Why is it everybody? Because for us, we hold ourselves to a higher standard. This is not just another DC gig. This is about saving Western civilization. “We are the most important organization in the country. You are part of it. It’s something bigger than all of us, and it will have ramifications across the country. I’m so thankful for you guys. You guys have really defied gravity. And let’s continue to make history here.”

New Turning Point video shows exactly why Charlie Kirk was the greatest CEO in the history of grassroots political organizations. Take just two minutes to watch this. These are the words of a transformational leader: “Well, you [Turning Point staff] are about to embark on something that is much bigger than yourself. So check your ego at the door. This is not about you, okay? I don’t care about your feelings. If you’re having a bad day, you know, go figure that out yourself. This is about us. This is about the country. And the eyes of the whole nation are, again, on Turning Point. “We do the best events in the movement. In fact, we do the only event. Are there any other events in the movement? No. We’ve kind of put everyone else out of business, right? So we are the only standard of excellence. And so we hold ourselves to a higher standard. We don’t do mediocre around here. We try to raise the level of excellence because we are constantly trying to push the conservative movement and the country to a place it’s never been before. “You guys know this. Turning Point USA is the most important organization in the country, period. Find me another organization that’s been able to move millions of people the way that we have, that does the events, that does training. Nobody does what we do at Turning Point USA, but it starts with all of you. We’re building something bigger than you, bigger than me. “We’re building an experience to help save the country. And if this type of intensity bothers you, well, then, don’t go work for Turning Point USA. You can go work for the Department of Labor or something, okay? Because here we do excellent things. We do big things. We make history here at Turning Point USA. “It’s going to be early mornings. It’s going to be late nights, but you all get to know that you’re doing something rewarding that is not just, oh, a career. And you check the box, but lives will be changed. How blessed are we that we get to be here celebrating the country. And this is our job. It’s pretty awesome. “There’s the one thing that I hear from speakers throughout all the years. Your team is so impressive and they’re so young. Why is it everybody? Because for us, we hold ourselves to a higher standard. This is not just another DC gig. This is about saving Western civilization. “We are the most important organization in the country. You are part of it. It’s something bigger than all of us, and it will have ramifications across the country. I’m so thankful for you guys. You guys have really defied gravity. And let’s continue to make history here.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

288,288 views • 9 months ago

Just like with Obama, you won't really see how bad of a decision this was until a few years. Obama literally paved the way for the LGBTQ movement through legislation and they called us homophobic. Now when we warn you of what is to come they will call us Islamaphobic. Just remember the world is bigger than the U.S. The world is bigger than Republican vs Democrat. We have become so woke we don't want to hurt people's feelings and that is what will be the thing that brings us to our knees.

Just like with Obama, you won't really see how bad of a decision this was until a few years. Obama literally paved the way for the LGBTQ movement through legislation and they called us homophobic. Now when we warn you of what is to come they will call us Islamaphobic. Just remember the world is bigger than the U.S. The world is bigger than Republican vs Democrat. We have become so woke we don't want to hurt people's feelings and that is what will be the thing that brings us to our knees.

Trump Girl 🇺🇲🦅🇺🇲

141,710 views • 7 months ago

Marc Andreessen on the 3 things he looks for when investing in a startup The first thing Marc Andreesen looks for is a big market: “Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and displace incumbents? Or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big?” The second thing he looks for is a 10x better product: “Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that justifies a new company? And the way I always think about that is: Is there a 10x change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10x faster, 10x cheaper, or 10x better? If it’s not 10x, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs have to ask ourselves if it’s really worth doing because it’s really hard to start new companies . . . Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. So for a new company to exist, it has to bring a product to market that’s so much better than what exists that it punches through the status quo.” The third is the team: “Is the team outstanding? . . . You want to have a founding team of complementary skillsets. You want to have at least one super strong technologist — quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist. And then it often helps to have someone who is a marketing or salesperson who has a really good understanding of business.” Marc believes that you need all three of these, but if you’re going to compromise on one of those as an investor, it should be the product: “A great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution. The problem with a poor or small market is that even if you do a good job on the product, there just aren’t that many customers so it’s hard to ever get big and people get demoralized . . . And then we evaluate the team of a startup by its ability to get into a big market with a good product.”

Marc Andreessen on the 3 things he looks for when investing in a startup The first thing Marc Andreesen looks for is a big market: “Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and displace incumbents? Or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big?” The second thing he looks for is a 10x better product: “Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that justifies a new company? And the way I always think about that is: Is there a 10x change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10x faster, 10x cheaper, or 10x better? If it’s not 10x, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs have to ask ourselves if it’s really worth doing because it’s really hard to start new companies . . . Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. So for a new company to exist, it has to bring a product to market that’s so much better than what exists that it punches through the status quo.” The third is the team: “Is the team outstanding? . . . You want to have a founding team of complementary skillsets. You want to have at least one super strong technologist — quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist. And then it often helps to have someone who is a marketing or salesperson who has a really good understanding of business.” Marc believes that you need all three of these, but if you’re going to compromise on one of those as an investor, it should be the product: “A great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution. The problem with a poor or small market is that even if you do a good job on the product, there just aren’t that many customers so it’s hard to ever get big and people get demoralized . . . And then we evaluate the team of a startup by its ability to get into a big market with a good product.”

Startup Archive

17,320 views • 4 months ago

We were told to accept our society how it is… But we never learned how some “truths” came about As it turns out, our world has been shaped by forces looking to make a profit With zero care about what is the best for us and our health And some even with darker intentions than profit alone People assume that in the modern world over time we have seen all the available data... … and then come to the best and most truthful conclusions not knowing that our whole world has been shaped by other forces The best way to be healthy is to educate yourself about those forces And see where they have shaped our environments, our food supply, our clothes, our health systems and more See where the control systems lie, so you can step outside of them Think critically, and ask questions. Do your own research, and understand WHY your doctor may recommend something. Is It because he’s receiving a kickback on the medication sales? Maybe you should ask "Why am I eating this?" Could it be because 50 years ago a falsified study was done to promote a product that wasn’t actually healthy, but needed new customers? If you are curious then you should always be pursuing the truth And the facts of the matter are that anyone who pursues the truth begins to see the cracks So if you’re someone who has done that, and got this far with their head intact Who has been able to become conscious to the ways of the world Then congratulations to you my friend We’re on the same page.

We were told to accept our society how it is… But we never learned how some “truths” came about As it turns out, our world has been shaped by forces looking to make a profit With zero care about what is the best for us and our health And some even with darker intentions than profit alone People assume that in the modern world over time we have seen all the available data... … and then come to the best and most truthful conclusions not knowing that our whole world has been shaped by other forces The best way to be healthy is to educate yourself about those forces And see where they have shaped our environments, our food supply, our clothes, our health systems and more See where the control systems lie, so you can step outside of them Think critically, and ask questions. Do your own research, and understand WHY your doctor may recommend something. Is It because he’s receiving a kickback on the medication sales? Maybe you should ask "Why am I eating this?" Could it be because 50 years ago a falsified study was done to promote a product that wasn’t actually healthy, but needed new customers? If you are curious then you should always be pursuing the truth And the facts of the matter are that anyone who pursues the truth begins to see the cracks So if you’re someone who has done that, and got this far with their head intact Who has been able to become conscious to the ways of the world Then congratulations to you my friend We’re on the same page.

⚡️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬

13,131 views • 7 months ago

THIS WEEKEND, IT’S NOT ABOUT YOU. IT’S ABOUT THEM. Memorial Day isn’t a day of sadness—It’s a day of honor. It’s a day to pay respect to the men and women who gave everything. Not just for a flag. Not for glory. But for the person to their left and their right. For this country—for something greater than themselves. We get to live with the benefits of their sacrifice. The freedoms. The opportunities. The respect that the uniform still commands. But make no mistake—we didn’t earn that. THEY did. Say their names. Say them proud. Say them with honor. Say them with respect. As bad as it hurts, it’s what THEY would want. If any of us gave our lives for this country wouldn’t want a single tear, a single moment of sadness. We’d want the world to know: we died with honor and dignity, for something greater than ourselves. And don’t you dare tell others to honor them, to respect them, or to live a life worthy of their sacrifice—if you’re not doing the same. Don’t post for attention. Don’t make it about your feelings. Don’t turn it into a day about you. Make it about them. Live in a way that’s worthy of what they gave up. Make this weekend an act of honor. Because they gave their tomorrows for our todays. Happy Memorial Day. GYSGT KENEFICK LT JOHNSON GYSGT JOHNSON DOC LAYTON DOC CANNON SGT WRIGHTSMAN

THIS WEEKEND, IT’S NOT ABOUT YOU. IT’S ABOUT THEM. Memorial Day isn’t a day of sadness—It’s a day of honor. It’s a day to pay respect to the men and women who gave everything. Not just for a flag. Not for glory. But for the person to their left and their right. For this country—for something greater than themselves. We get to live with the benefits of their sacrifice. The freedoms. The opportunities. The respect that the uniform still commands. But make no mistake—we didn’t earn that. THEY did. Say their names. Say them proud. Say them with honor. Say them with respect. As bad as it hurts, it’s what THEY would want. If any of us gave our lives for this country wouldn’t want a single tear, a single moment of sadness. We’d want the world to know: we died with honor and dignity, for something greater than ourselves. And don’t you dare tell others to honor them, to respect them, or to live a life worthy of their sacrifice—if you’re not doing the same. Don’t post for attention. Don’t make it about your feelings. Don’t turn it into a day about you. Make it about them. Live in a way that’s worthy of what they gave up. Make this weekend an act of honor. Because they gave their tomorrows for our todays. Happy Memorial Day. GYSGT KENEFICK LT JOHNSON GYSGT JOHNSON DOC LAYTON DOC CANNON SGT WRIGHTSMAN

Dakota Meyer

43,201 views • 1 year ago

We are not okay, and that’s okay to say. I wish I could tell you that we are standing here and that the rest of the world is standing with us. With you. Sadly I can’t say that. There is a loud and aggressive minority around the world who doesn’t get, that being murdered at a peace festival does not equal resistance. I do however, know that we are standing here on behalf of all those people in the world, with moral clarity. And there are a lot of them. And there are many who want to be here with you. And they are here with you at heart. On October 7th, your loved ones went to Nova. We call it a peace music festival because that’s what it was—a place to make new friends, to let loos explore and celebrate life. And this juxtaposition hurts the most —because on that day, the light your loved ones were, was met with the most unimaginable darkness. Our lives will never be the same. But today, as we remember them, we also make a promise: to honor their memory by living as they would have. As we stand here in grief, we have a message to the world: we will not be defeated. Israel was attacked on October 7th and every day since, for the crime of existing. For the audacity of just being here. But we are here, and we are here to stay. And despite the trauma we’ve faced, we are in Israel, standing strong together, committed to the memories of those we lost and to the return of our hostages. We, despite the pain and alongside it, are going to build a brighter future. Together. We will dance again. Am Yisrael Chai Forever

We are not okay, and that’s okay to say. I wish I could tell you that we are standing here and that the rest of the world is standing with us. With you. Sadly I can’t say that. There is a loud and aggressive minority around the world who doesn’t get, that being murdered at a peace festival does not equal resistance. I do however, know that we are standing here on behalf of all those people in the world, with moral clarity. And there are a lot of them. And there are many who want to be here with you. And they are here with you at heart. On October 7th, your loved ones went to Nova. We call it a peace music festival because that’s what it was—a place to make new friends, to let loos explore and celebrate life. And this juxtaposition hurts the most —because on that day, the light your loved ones were, was met with the most unimaginable darkness. Our lives will never be the same. But today, as we remember them, we also make a promise: to honor their memory by living as they would have. As we stand here in grief, we have a message to the world: we will not be defeated. Israel was attacked on October 7th and every day since, for the crime of existing. For the audacity of just being here. But we are here, and we are here to stay. And despite the trauma we’ve faced, we are in Israel, standing strong together, committed to the memories of those we lost and to the return of our hostages. We, despite the pain and alongside it, are going to build a brighter future. Together. We will dance again. Am Yisrael Chai Forever

Noa Tishby

32,728 views • 8 months ago

Every major decision in human history has been made the same way. Guess. Execute. Hope it doesn’t break the world. That era is ending. Simile CEO Joon Sung Park just revealed what the most serious AI researchers are actually building toward. Park: “Our goal eventually is to ask ourselves what would it mean if we can create simulations of 8 billion people? The entire Earth.” Not a metaphor. A literal, bottom-up digital replica of civilization. We assumed the ultimate goal of AI was to predict the future. Park says that’s thinking too small. He points to The Oracle in The Matrix to explain the real paradigm shift. Park: “You’re not necessarily here to make a decision. You’ve already made that decision. You’re here to understand the decision and why you made that.” AI isn’t a crystal ball to tell us what happens next. It’s an x-ray to show us why. Think about how civilization actually operates right now. We guess. We pass a law. We shift an economic policy. We launch a product. Then we wait a decade to find out if it broke the world. The simulation ends that. Before a government passes a policy, they run a dry-run on 8 billion digital agents. Before a company ships a product, they trace the exact moment the market breaks. Park: “Creating these kind of bottom up simulations where we can actually go back and trace through the audit logs of how society might unfold is an amazing way to gain that interpretability layer of our reality.” Let that phrase land. The interpretability layer of our reality. We spent the last twenty years extracting data from the physical world. We are about to spend the next twenty years using that data to build a mirror world. One where every policy gets stress-tested before it’s enacted. Every product before it ships. Every decision before its consequences become irreversible. Park: “If you want to shape new policies, new products that would actually serve the people, the best way is actually to understand those people and communicating with them at a scalable way to basically create those policies.” We are not moving from ignorance to prediction. We are moving from blind execution to total societal foresight. And once that capability exists, everything changes. Wars modeled before they’re fought. Economies stress-tested before they collapse. Policies run through billions of digital lives before a single real one is affected. Reality becomes the place we execute what the mirror world already proved would work. The ultimate application of artificial intelligence was never about replacing human judgment. It was always about perfecting it. We aren’t just predicting the future anymore. We are rehearsing it. And when you can rehearse the future before you live it, the most catastrophic word in human history finally becomes extinct. That word is surprise.

Every major decision in human history has been made the same way. Guess. Execute. Hope it doesn’t break the world. That era is ending. Simile CEO Joon Sung Park just revealed what the most serious AI researchers are actually building toward. Park: “Our goal eventually is to ask ourselves what would it mean if we can create simulations of 8 billion people? The entire Earth.” Not a metaphor. A literal, bottom-up digital replica of civilization. We assumed the ultimate goal of AI was to predict the future. Park says that’s thinking too small. He points to The Oracle in The Matrix to explain the real paradigm shift. Park: “You’re not necessarily here to make a decision. You’ve already made that decision. You’re here to understand the decision and why you made that.” AI isn’t a crystal ball to tell us what happens next. It’s an x-ray to show us why. Think about how civilization actually operates right now. We guess. We pass a law. We shift an economic policy. We launch a product. Then we wait a decade to find out if it broke the world. The simulation ends that. Before a government passes a policy, they run a dry-run on 8 billion digital agents. Before a company ships a product, they trace the exact moment the market breaks. Park: “Creating these kind of bottom up simulations where we can actually go back and trace through the audit logs of how society might unfold is an amazing way to gain that interpretability layer of our reality.” Let that phrase land. The interpretability layer of our reality. We spent the last twenty years extracting data from the physical world. We are about to spend the next twenty years using that data to build a mirror world. One where every policy gets stress-tested before it’s enacted. Every product before it ships. Every decision before its consequences become irreversible. Park: “If you want to shape new policies, new products that would actually serve the people, the best way is actually to understand those people and communicating with them at a scalable way to basically create those policies.” We are not moving from ignorance to prediction. We are moving from blind execution to total societal foresight. And once that capability exists, everything changes. Wars modeled before they’re fought. Economies stress-tested before they collapse. Policies run through billions of digital lives before a single real one is affected. Reality becomes the place we execute what the mirror world already proved would work. The ultimate application of artificial intelligence was never about replacing human judgment. It was always about perfecting it. We aren’t just predicting the future anymore. We are rehearsing it. And when you can rehearse the future before you live it, the most catastrophic word in human history finally becomes extinct. That word is surprise.

Dustin

33,132 views • 4 months ago

🚨 This message is for Donald J. Trump from a Farmer Who Voted For You. MUST WATCH! 🔥🔥🔥 We had your back. Through the smears, the witch hunts, the stolen election—we rode for you. Boat parades. Truck convoys. We turned out because you promised to drain the swamp. But now you're sitting on the Epstein client list… and staying silent? You don’t get to preach “law and order” while protecting the worst predators alive. You don’t get to wrap yourself in the flag and then bury justice just because it’s inconvenient or involves your party. You weren’t elected to protect elites. You were elected to expose them. And if this was about protecting Israel, or cutting backroom deals to pass a “big beautiful bill” — we don’t care. Because kids were hurt. Lives were destroyed. And we’re supposed to believe there’s no list? Get real. We know you weren’t like the rest of them on that plane. But if you’re not one of them — why protect them? We didn’t put you in office so you could shield the swamp. We put you there to burn it down. This ain’t about politics anymore. It’s about right and wrong. You can't stay quiet on Epstein SHARE THIS AND TAG EVERYONE IN THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION

🚨 This message is for Donald J. Trump from a Farmer Who Voted For You. MUST WATCH! 🔥🔥🔥 We had your back. Through the smears, the witch hunts, the stolen election—we rode for you. Boat parades. Truck convoys. We turned out because you promised to drain the swamp. But now you're sitting on the Epstein client list… and staying silent? You don’t get to preach “law and order” while protecting the worst predators alive. You don’t get to wrap yourself in the flag and then bury justice just because it’s inconvenient or involves your party. You weren’t elected to protect elites. You were elected to expose them. And if this was about protecting Israel, or cutting backroom deals to pass a “big beautiful bill” — we don’t care. Because kids were hurt. Lives were destroyed. And we’re supposed to believe there’s no list? Get real. We know you weren’t like the rest of them on that plane. But if you’re not one of them — why protect them? We didn’t put you in office so you could shield the swamp. We put you there to burn it down. This ain’t about politics anymore. It’s about right and wrong. You can't stay quiet on Epstein SHARE THIS AND TAG EVERYONE IN THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION

Project Constitution

263,960 views • 11 months ago

Steve Jobs on how to build a great brand After re-joining Apple in 1996, Steve Jobs announced the “Think different” campaign with the following statement: “To me, marketing is about values. This is a very complicated and noisy world. We’re not going to get a chance to get people to remember much about us. No company is. So we have to be really clear on what we want them to know about us.” He cites Nike as one of the greatest jobs of marketing the universe has ever seen: “Remember, Nike sells a commodity—they sell shoes! And yet when you think of Nike, you feel something different than a shoe company. In their ads, they don’t ever talk about the product. They don’t ever tell you about their air soles and why they are better than Reebok’s air soles. What does Nike do in their advertising? They honor great athletes, and they honor great athletics. That’s who they are, that’s what they are about.” Marketing guru Seth Godin also used Nike as an example of great branding in a blog post a few years ago: “If Nike announced that they were opening a hotel, you’d have a pretty good guess about what it would be like. But if Hyatt announced that they were going to start making shoes, you would have NO IDEA WHATSOEVER what those shoes would be like. That’s because Nike owns a brand and Hyatt simply owns real estate.” Jobs goes on to explain how the Apple team arrived at the “Think Different” campaign: “Our customers want to know who is Apple and what is it that we stand for. Where do we fit in this world? What we’re about isn’t making boxes for people to get their jobs done—although we do that well. We do that better than almost anybody, in some cases. But Apple is about something more than that. Apple at the core—its core value—is that we believe people with passion can change the world for the better… And that those people who are crazy enough to think that they can change the world are the ones who actually do.” He continues: “And so, what we’re going to do in our first brand marketing campaign in several years is to get back to that core value. A lot of things have changed. The market is in a totally different place than it was a decade ago, and Apple is totally different… the products and the distribution strategy and the manufacturing are totally different. And we understand that. But values and core values—those things shouldn’t change. The things that Apple believed in, at its core, are the same things that Apple really stands for today.” Apple’s “Think Different” campaign was designed to honor those people who have changed the world. And as Jobs so eloquently put it: “Some of them are living. Some of them are not. But the ones that aren’t, you’ll know that if they ever used a computer, it would’ve been a Mac. The theme of the campaign is ‘Think Different.’ It’s honoring the people who think different and who move this world forward. And it is what we are about. It touches the soul of this company.” If you’re looking to create a great brand, I’d start out by asking: what are your core values and what does your company honor?

Startup Archive

338,047 views • 2 years ago

Kevin O’Leary says the quiet part out loud about what Secretary Rubio’s speech meant in Munich: “You’re either with us — or you’re not.” O’Leary then laid out the nightmarish dystopian future if China were to win global dominance. This was a direct warning to all of Europe. O’LEARY: “This all started a few weeks ago at Davos on the famous speech Carney gave, the prime minister of Canada, with the words ‘new world order.’ That did not go well with the Trump administration, as you remember.” “Actually, it hurt relations with Canada at this point, which hasn’t really restarted on the tariff front.” “The point is though we are getting to a place now where there’s only adversary, and I think it’s time to just call it out, China. That’s it.” “And so you either are with us, so to speak, against China, or you’re not.” “Because China is getting ready for world dominance.” “I call it what it is. Economically, militarily, AI, power, you name it, those guys are not fooling around, and if we don’t wake up and get together on this, they will be the superpower.” “Now, if you’re okay with that and you want to live in that kind of a world, well, I don’t. So I’d like to see this thing worked out pretty damn fast.” “Because Europe has to get on board, Canada has to get on board, everybody that believes in democracy, freedom and capitalism has to get on board.” “Or, you will see those guys walk into your country one day.”

Kevin O’Leary says the quiet part out loud about what Secretary Rubio’s speech meant in Munich: “You’re either with us — or you’re not.” O’Leary then laid out the nightmarish dystopian future if China were to win global dominance. This was a direct warning to all of Europe. O’LEARY: “This all started a few weeks ago at Davos on the famous speech Carney gave, the prime minister of Canada, with the words ‘new world order.’ That did not go well with the Trump administration, as you remember.” “Actually, it hurt relations with Canada at this point, which hasn’t really restarted on the tariff front.” “The point is though we are getting to a place now where there’s only adversary, and I think it’s time to just call it out, China. That’s it.” “And so you either are with us, so to speak, against China, or you’re not.” “Because China is getting ready for world dominance.” “I call it what it is. Economically, militarily, AI, power, you name it, those guys are not fooling around, and if we don’t wake up and get together on this, they will be the superpower.” “Now, if you’re okay with that and you want to live in that kind of a world, well, I don’t. So I’d like to see this thing worked out pretty damn fast.” “Because Europe has to get on board, Canada has to get on board, everybody that believes in democracy, freedom and capitalism has to get on board.” “Or, you will see those guys walk into your country one day.”

Overton

301,748 views • 4 months ago

If you're an $XRP hater, you need to listen here 👇🚨 The XRP Army gets mocked daily. We’re called shills, bots, or worse, just for believing in a project solving a real-world problem. But here’s the truth most won’t admit: We’re not paid. We’re not recruited. We’re investors who saw utility, real vision, and the need for change. We didn’t jump on hype, we held through silence. We’re here because we see what blockchain can unlock for everyday people: Banking the unbanked, eliminating middlemen, giving the little guy a seat at the financial table. Ripple is already delivering on that vision. Governments, banks, and top financial institutions are partnering. While others are still making promises, Ripple is integrating. You can scream decentralization all day, but eventually, real systems need rails that work. That’s why XRP is still standing. Mock us now, or take the time to understand what we actually stand for. Repost if you’re part of the $XRP Army that never folded. Follow me if you want real insight, not just headlines and hopium 👇

If you're an $XRP hater, you need to listen here 👇🚨 The XRP Army gets mocked daily. We’re called shills, bots, or worse, just for believing in a project solving a real-world problem. But here’s the truth most won’t admit: We’re not paid. We’re not recruited. We’re investors who saw utility, real vision, and the need for change. We didn’t jump on hype, we held through silence. We’re here because we see what blockchain can unlock for everyday people: Banking the unbanked, eliminating middlemen, giving the little guy a seat at the financial table. Ripple is already delivering on that vision. Governments, banks, and top financial institutions are partnering. While others are still making promises, Ripple is integrating. You can scream decentralization all day, but eventually, real systems need rails that work. That’s why XRP is still standing. Mock us now, or take the time to understand what we actually stand for. Repost if you’re part of the $XRP Army that never folded. Follow me if you want real insight, not just headlines and hopium 👇

X Finance Bull

187,969 views • 7 months ago

Suozzi: When something crazy is being proposed—something outlandish—we need to fight and resist. But when something addresses the concerns of the American people, we need to find common ground and get things done. This isn’t just about the election in 2026 or the election in 2028. It’s about right now. It’s about making people’s lives better now. A lot of people will say, “Well, the Republicans didn’t do that. They didn’t help Biden get things done. They didn’t work across party lines when they controlled the House.” And that’s true. It was the least productive Congress in modern history… But just because that’s what they did doesn’t mean that’s what we should do. It’s not just about winning. It’s about trying to move the country forward, solve problems, and make people’s lives better. This business isn’t worth it for the ego or just for the competition—“I’m right, you’re wrong; I win, you lose.” It’s only worth it if we’re actually making the world a better place to live in. We need to call out the Republicans when they do crazy stuff, when they’re extreme. But we also need to work with them when we can find ways forward to make our country a better place to live in.

Suozzi: When something crazy is being proposed—something outlandish—we need to fight and resist. But when something addresses the concerns of the American people, we need to find common ground and get things done. This isn’t just about the election in 2026 or the election in 2028. It’s about right now. It’s about making people’s lives better now. A lot of people will say, “Well, the Republicans didn’t do that. They didn’t help Biden get things done. They didn’t work across party lines when they controlled the House.” And that’s true. It was the least productive Congress in modern history… But just because that’s what they did doesn’t mean that’s what we should do. It’s not just about winning. It’s about trying to move the country forward, solve problems, and make people’s lives better. This business isn’t worth it for the ego or just for the competition—“I’m right, you’re wrong; I win, you lose.” It’s only worth it if we’re actually making the world a better place to live in. We need to call out the Republicans when they do crazy stuff, when they’re extreme. But we also need to work with them when we can find ways forward to make our country a better place to live in.

Acyn

47,870 views • 1 year ago