Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

THIS WHITE HACKER FINDS PUBLIC WI-FI SECURITY FLAWS AND CAN GET PAID $10K FOR IT. A tiny device. One fake “Free Wi-Fi” network. One login page that looks real. That’s enough to test if employees will enter credentials into the wrong place. He doesn’t steal passwords. He runs authorized...

thegreatest_sv's profile picture

kiosa

2,396 subscribers

12,680 views • 24 days ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The first thing many of us do when we arrive somewhere is connect to Wi-Fi — airports, cafés, offices, lounges. But here’s the reality: Wi-Fi can be faked. With just a phone, cybercriminals can clone a network, force your device to disconnect from the real one, and redirect you to a fake login page that captures your personal details. Public Wi-Fi isn’t always what it seems. ✔️ Verify network names ✔️ Avoid duplicate hotspots ✔️ Be cautious with “free” Wi-Fi Awareness is your first layer of security. #CyberSecurity #DigitalSafety #PublicWiFi #TechAwareness #InfoSec
2:04

The first thing many of us do when we arrive somewhere is connect to Wi-Fi — airports, cafés, offices, lounges. But here’s the reality: Wi-Fi can be faked. With just a phone, cybercriminals can clone a network, force your device to disconnect from the real one, and redirect you to a fake login page that captures your personal details. Public Wi-Fi isn’t always what it seems. ✔️ Verify network names ✔️ Avoid duplicate hotspots ✔️ Be cautious with “free” Wi-Fi Awareness is your first layer of security. #CyberSecurity #DigitalSafety #PublicWiFi #TechAwareness #InfoSec

Bright Mawudor,PhD

13,731 views • 6 months ago

Not all Wi-Fi is safe Wi-Fi. Especially the WPA2 protocols Public networks can be intercepted, meaning someone on the same Wi-Fi could potentially see what you’re doing including login credentials and sensitive data. This is done on an unexpected traffic which they can depreciate your portal or redirect you to a fake login page if you are a primary target. If you’re sending sensitive information: • Use your phone as hotspot • Use a trusted private Wi-Fi • Avoid public networks and forget them when done with it. . If the page looks real or depreciating to HTTP, look again.
1:13

Not all Wi-Fi is safe Wi-Fi. Especially the WPA2 protocols Public networks can be intercepted, meaning someone on the same Wi-Fi could potentially see what you’re doing including login credentials and sensitive data. This is done on an unexpected traffic which they can depreciate your portal or redirect you to a fake login page if you are a primary target. If you’re sending sensitive information: • Use your phone as hotspot • Use a trusted private Wi-Fi • Avoid public networks and forget them when done with it. . If the page looks real or depreciating to HTTP, look again.

Bright Mawudor,PhD

21,339 views • 5 months ago

THIS DEVELOPER JUST REVEALED THE WEIRD LITTLE GADGET HE USES TO COLLECT WI-FI HANDSHAKES. Some security researchers reportedly earn up to $15,000/month finding vulnerabilities companies missed. At first glance it looks like a Tamagotchi. But instead of eating food… it “eats” Wi-Fi networks. The more Wi-Fi handshakes it captures, the more effective it becomes at finding nearby networks. Security researchers use tools like this to audit wireless security and identify weaknesses before attackers do. The surprising part? Companies pay real money for valid security findings. Some bug bounty rewards can range from hundreds to thousands of dollars depending on the impact. Here’s how you can build the same workflow with Claude
0:55

THIS DEVELOPER JUST REVEALED THE WEIRD LITTLE GADGET HE USES TO COLLECT WI-FI HANDSHAKES. Some security researchers reportedly earn up to $15,000/month finding vulnerabilities companies missed. At first glance it looks like a Tamagotchi. But instead of eating food… it “eats” Wi-Fi networks. The more Wi-Fi handshakes it captures, the more effective it becomes at finding nearby networks. Security researchers use tools like this to audit wireless security and identify weaknesses before attackers do. The surprising part? Companies pay real money for valid security findings. Some bug bounty rewards can range from hundreds to thousands of dollars depending on the impact. Here’s how you can build the same workflow with Claude

kiosa

11,730 views • 1 month ago

THIS GUY WALKS AROUND WITH A SMALL DEVICE LOOKING FOR WI-FI WEAKNESSES AND REPORTEDLY MAKES UP TO $15,000/MONTH. Some companies pay thousands of dollars for valid security findings. it's called Claude-BugHunter. free. MIT license. installs in 3 minutes. it turns Claude into a security researcher with: > 51 specialist skills > 574 real-world attack patterns > 24 vulnerability classes > Built-in validation > Auto-generated bounty reports The killer feature? /triage Before you submit anything, Claude tries to kill your finding. One failed check = no report. That’s the difference between getting paid and getting ignored. Bug bounties range from $50 to $25,000+ per valid vulnerability. Cost to start: ~$20/month. Full setup below
0:29

THIS GUY WALKS AROUND WITH A SMALL DEVICE LOOKING FOR WI-FI WEAKNESSES AND REPORTEDLY MAKES UP TO $15,000/MONTH. Some companies pay thousands of dollars for valid security findings. it's called Claude-BugHunter. free. MIT license. installs in 3 minutes. it turns Claude into a security researcher with: > 51 specialist skills > 574 real-world attack patterns > 24 vulnerability classes > Built-in validation > Auto-generated bounty reports The killer feature? /triage Before you submit anything, Claude tries to kill your finding. One failed check = no report. That’s the difference between getting paid and getting ignored. Bug bounties range from $50 to $25,000+ per valid vulnerability. Cost to start: ~$20/month. Full setup below

kiosa

77,255 views • 1 month ago

“I will predict with total certainty that Trump hasn’t read this national security strategy. He signed an introduction to it. I doubt he read the introduction. He doesn’t care about it, anyway. He doesn’t have a philosophy. He, himself, doesn’t have a design for American national security, doesn’t even really do policy the way we underhand it in Washington. And that’s why the ramifications of Trump’s approach are so dangerous.” — Amb. John Bolton, former national security advisor for Trump, at the Renew Democracy Initiative 2025 Frontlines of Freedom Conference
1:23

“I will predict with total certainty that Trump hasn’t read this national security strategy. He signed an introduction to it. I doubt he read the introduction. He doesn’t care about it, anyway. He doesn’t have a philosophy. He, himself, doesn’t have a design for American national security, doesn’t even really do policy the way we underhand it in Washington. And that’s why the ramifications of Trump’s approach are so dangerous.” — Amb. John Bolton, former national security advisor for Trump, at the Renew Democracy Initiative 2025 Frontlines of Freedom Conference

Charlotte Clymer 🇺🇦

559,893 views • 7 months ago

Here’s the truth: not everyone gets in. Brands have to bring something new, limited editions, global launches, real experiences. If it doesn’t move the needle for collectors, it doesn’t make the cut. That’s why this works. The Seddiqi family has the scale, the network, and the credibility to pull this off and they’ve taken it to a level nobody else has. Running one of the largest authorized dealer groups in the world and building a global watch event? That’s not easy. But when you do it right, the industry follows. Watch Full Youtube Video:
2:19

Here’s the truth: not everyone gets in. Brands have to bring something new, limited editions, global launches, real experiences. If it doesn’t move the needle for collectors, it doesn’t make the cut. That’s why this works. The Seddiqi family has the scale, the network, and the credibility to pull this off and they’ve taken it to a level nobody else has. Running one of the largest authorized dealer groups in the world and building a global watch event? That’s not easy. But when you do it right, the industry follows. Watch Full Youtube Video:

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

15,735 views • 6 months ago

THIS GUY REPLACED HIS ENTIRE CONTENT TEAM WITH A FREE AI AGENT - NOW GETS 340K VIEWS PER POST ALONE 😳 he uses hermes + obsidian and it's completely free - runs on the claude plan he already had you give it one idea and it splits into a team one part researches, one finds the angle, one writes the post, one turns it into a newsletter, one makes the captions all of that from a single sentence it already knows his voice, his audience, his business - so nothing it makes sounds generic he doesn't manage it, remind it, or babysit it 7,100 bookmarks, 340K views, 20 minutes per post, zero team, zero paid tools ↓ he wrote the full guide so you can copy the exact setup from zero:
17:04

THIS GUY REPLACED HIS ENTIRE CONTENT TEAM WITH A FREE AI AGENT - NOW GETS 340K VIEWS PER POST ALONE 😳 he uses hermes + obsidian and it's completely free - runs on the claude plan he already had you give it one idea and it splits into a team one part researches, one finds the angle, one writes the post, one turns it into a newsletter, one makes the captions all of that from a single sentence it already knows his voice, his audience, his business - so nothing it makes sounds generic he doesn't manage it, remind it, or babysit it 7,100 bookmarks, 340K views, 20 minutes per post, zero team, zero paid tools ↓ he wrote the full guide so you can copy the exact setup from zero:

Isra

25,653 views • 1 month ago

Gupta: He says he doesn’t want to exercise because he finds it boring, so he doesn’t really do aerobic activity. He walks on the golf course—that’s kind of the most that he does. And he eats frequent hamburgers and French fries, according to this article. In one sitting, a hamburger and French fries can be up to 80% of your sodium intake and saturated fat intake. That’s not healthy.
1:08

Gupta: He says he doesn’t want to exercise because he finds it boring, so he doesn’t really do aerobic activity. He walks on the golf course—that’s kind of the most that he does. And he eats frequent hamburgers and French fries, according to this article. In one sitting, a hamburger and French fries can be up to 80% of your sodium intake and saturated fat intake. That’s not healthy.

Acyn

160,533 views • 7 months ago

The $1B one-man company the The New York Times just profiled runs a system that got him to 833x growth. 300 users → 250,000. In 12 months. Everyone read the article and picked a side: “It’s fraud.” “It’s genius.” “It should be illegal.” I read it and saw a blueprint. Not the fake doctors. Not the AI-generated faces. Not the testimonials from people who don’t exist. I saw the layer underneath. A production system that turns one brief into hundreds of ad variants — no creative team, no studio, no media agency. One input. Hundreds of outputs. All running at once. That’s not marketing. That’s on-demand ad infrastructure. And it comes down to 5 steps. Step 1 is the architecture decision most brands skip because it doesn’t feel like “marketing.” Get it right → the other 4 become completely mechanical. That’s why he runs 800 ads while most brands struggle to ship 20 a week. Comment “Notch” and I’ll send you the full 5-step breakdown.
0:20

The $1B one-man company the The New York Times just profiled runs a system that got him to 833x growth. 300 users → 250,000. In 12 months. Everyone read the article and picked a side: “It’s fraud.” “It’s genius.” “It should be illegal.” I read it and saw a blueprint. Not the fake doctors. Not the AI-generated faces. Not the testimonials from people who don’t exist. I saw the layer underneath. A production system that turns one brief into hundreds of ad variants — no creative team, no studio, no media agency. One input. Hundreds of outputs. All running at once. That’s not marketing. That’s on-demand ad infrastructure. And it comes down to 5 steps. Step 1 is the architecture decision most brands skip because it doesn’t feel like “marketing.” Get it right → the other 4 become completely mechanical. That’s why he runs 800 ads while most brands struggle to ship 20 a week. Comment “Notch” and I’ll send you the full 5-step breakdown.

Vinay Jain

20,786 views • 4 months ago

Tucker Carlson was shocked when a hacker turned an ordinary light bulb into a device capable of spying on a Wi-Fi network. Ryan Montgomery: He took a regular bulb off of Amazon, it’s called uh Wyze. Like, and then he made a bunch of different ones. So, like you could buy this smart bulb on Amazon and make it change colors. Essentially, all that it does. He, uh, he put modified software or firmware onto this bulb. Tucker Carlson: And I can communicate with that light bulb from afar? Ryan Montgomery: Um, in in this this bulb, no, I have to you have to be within Wi-Fi range. There are other devices, they are implants that you could, at a distance, with SIM cards or or other means. Um, or if they’re plugged directly into the back of a computer, you know, like I do have one of those in my bag that you would never know, you would never unplug it because it looks like it’s it’s supposed to be there. That one connects, you know, I could be in Guatemala, and I can have complete control over that device from Guatemala. Tucker Carlson: Wow.
2:55

Tucker Carlson was shocked when a hacker turned an ordinary light bulb into a device capable of spying on a Wi-Fi network. Ryan Montgomery: He took a regular bulb off of Amazon, it’s called uh Wyze. Like, and then he made a bunch of different ones. So, like you could buy this smart bulb on Amazon and make it change colors. Essentially, all that it does. He, uh, he put modified software or firmware onto this bulb. Tucker Carlson: And I can communicate with that light bulb from afar? Ryan Montgomery: Um, in in this this bulb, no, I have to you have to be within Wi-Fi range. There are other devices, they are implants that you could, at a distance, with SIM cards or or other means. Um, or if they’re plugged directly into the back of a computer, you know, like I do have one of those in my bag that you would never know, you would never unplug it because it looks like it’s it’s supposed to be there. That one connects, you know, I could be in Guatemala, and I can have complete control over that device from Guatemala. Tucker Carlson: Wow.

Ruzy.hl

671,031 views • 1 month ago

This man hired this company to redo the concrete in his back patio area. They agreed on a price and signed a contract. The company was almost done when the customer claimed that they did it wrong, the company then said they would demolish it if he wouldn’t or couldn’t pay. The customer then threatens to call the police if they remove or damage the work already done even though he hasn’t paid them a dime yet. The company at this point has paid for all materials. Since he won’t pay them, are they free to do what they want including demolishing the work they did?
1:31

This man hired this company to redo the concrete in his back patio area. They agreed on a price and signed a contract. The company was almost done when the customer claimed that they did it wrong, the company then said they would demolish it if he wouldn’t or couldn’t pay. The customer then threatens to call the police if they remove or damage the work already done even though he hasn’t paid them a dime yet. The company at this point has paid for all materials. Since he won’t pay them, are they free to do what they want including demolishing the work they did?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

1,697,770 views • 5 months ago

Nico Leonard ‘watch expert’ reveals he as expose Rick Ross for buying fake watches ‘That was embarrassing but he can afford the real one so why would it matter if it’s the fake one’ ‘He as like $20M house in Florida you can’t find a watch of that magnitude,that watch is part of a set of 10 watches that’s like $12 or $14M’ ‘You couldn’t get that watch individually that’s how I knew it was fake so he bought it after market it was fully custom’ ‘You have a watch and it as an AP movement but not made by them is that watch real or fake’
1:17

Nico Leonard ‘watch expert’ reveals he as expose Rick Ross for buying fake watches ‘That was embarrassing but he can afford the real one so why would it matter if it’s the fake one’ ‘He as like $20M house in Florida you can’t find a watch of that magnitude,that watch is part of a set of 10 watches that’s like $12 or $14M’ ‘You couldn’t get that watch individually that’s how I knew it was fake so he bought it after market it was fully custom’ ‘You have a watch and it as an AP movement but not made by them is that watch real or fake’

zaza

126,077 views • 3 months ago

A guy installed a mini Nvidia AI data center on his house and gets paid monthly The box is the size of a small fridge and bolts right onto the wall. Inside it is packed with Nvidia GPUs running AI workloads 24/7. He hooked it up next to his AC and that was it. Now the company pays him a flat fee for the power and Wi-Fi it uses. He says it lands him around $2,500 a month straight into his account. The unit even helps cool the side of his house, dropping his AC bill by $150. That stacks to over $30,000 a year for doing literally nothing. His mortgage is now fully paid by a box in his yard. The crazy part is regular homes are quietly becoming AI infrastructure. Save this, you are watching the next gold rush hit the suburbs.
0:33

A guy installed a mini Nvidia AI data center on his house and gets paid monthly The box is the size of a small fridge and bolts right onto the wall. Inside it is packed with Nvidia GPUs running AI workloads 24/7. He hooked it up next to his AC and that was it. Now the company pays him a flat fee for the power and Wi-Fi it uses. He says it lands him around $2,500 a month straight into his account. The unit even helps cool the side of his house, dropping his AC bill by $150. That stacks to over $30,000 a year for doing literally nothing. His mortgage is now fully paid by a box in his yard. The crazy part is regular homes are quietly becoming AI infrastructure. Save this, you are watching the next gold rush hit the suburbs.

winkle.

7,178,423 views • 2 months ago

He knows that’s Ronnie baby that’s why he not trying hard to fight for him he making up every excuse in the book to not see that child he claims Chrisean is a unstable mother which she is but gonna continue to let his “son” in her care ???? He scared to do the dna test for real bc he knows the truth gonna come out and say that jr is not his! I fear he knows Chrisean is a suspect in Ronnie death bc he coving for her he knows she got him killed and don’t want her to go to jail so he lying for her and avoiding the dna test ! He knows she had something to do with it and then he protecting Zeus too bc they gave him a fake dna test and if he takes a real one and it says the truth Zeus can get in trouble I know what’s going on here !!
1:32

Sensitive content

He knows that’s Ronnie baby that’s why he not trying hard to fight for him he making up every excuse in the book to not see that child he claims Chrisean is a unstable mother which she is but gonna continue to let his “son” in her care ???? He scared to do the dna test for real bc he knows the truth gonna come out and say that jr is not his! I fear he knows Chrisean is a suspect in Ronnie death bc he coving for her he knows she got him killed and don’t want her to go to jail so he lying for her and avoiding the dna test ! He knows she had something to do with it and then he protecting Zeus too bc they gave him a fake dna test and if he takes a real one and it says the truth Zeus can get in trouble I know what’s going on here !!

imthehatedfanpage

180,986 views • 8 months ago

Palace Confidential thread. 1/5. Rebecca saying she was told that, at the time of the Sandringham summit Harry not only knew he'd lose MET police protection if he moved to Nth America, that he'd accepted it. And that the negotiations were then around what private security he'd get, and who would pay for it. It turned out King Charles paid for at least a year of private security. Full ep
2:22

Palace Confidential thread. 1/5. Rebecca saying she was told that, at the time of the Sandringham summit Harry not only knew he'd lose MET police protection if he moved to Nth America, that he'd accepted it. And that the negotiations were then around what private security he'd get, and who would pay for it. It turned out King Charles paid for at least a year of private security. Full ep

mrc 🦇

427,137 views • 1 year ago

President Tinubu’s Yacht Purchase Is A Security Matter That Shouldn’t Be Open For Public Discussion He uses Air Force One in the case of the Air Force, and if there's a need for him to have a yacht, it is not for us to discuss such a security matter Former DG, BPP, Emeka Eze Full Clip:
3:05

President Tinubu’s Yacht Purchase Is A Security Matter That Shouldn’t Be Open For Public Discussion He uses Air Force One in the case of the Air Force, and if there's a need for him to have a yacht, it is not for us to discuss such a security matter Former DG, BPP, Emeka Eze Full Clip:

ARISE NEWS

506,474 views • 2 years ago

THIS GUY BUILT A SYSTEM THAT GETS SMARTER EVERY TIME HE USES IT AND IT LOOKS LIKE A GALAXY he types one command into Claude Code it finds sources, runs analysis through NotebookLM, saves everything to Obsidian automatically graph in the background is every idea he's ever researched - all linked together system handles the research so he only has to think about what to do with it most people are still copy-pasting into Notion and losing everything by next week full setup in the article
0:48

THIS GUY BUILT A SYSTEM THAT GETS SMARTER EVERY TIME HE USES IT AND IT LOOKS LIKE A GALAXY he types one command into Claude Code it finds sources, runs analysis through NotebookLM, saves everything to Obsidian automatically graph in the background is every idea he's ever researched - all linked together system handles the research so he only has to think about what to do with it most people are still copy-pasting into Notion and losing everything by next week full setup in the article

monokern

45,181 views • 2 months ago

Tim Pool rant about Candace Owens wasn’t just a meltdown. It was something far more calculated and far more dangerous. Anyone who’s watched enough online drama knows the difference between venting and engineering a message. Tim wasn’t venting. He was building a breadcrumb trail. Every few minutes he kept circling back to one topic that had nothing to do with his supposed argument: Candace Owens’ home security. Not her politics Not her commentary Not her feud with him Her security. Her house. Her lack of walls. Her one guard. Her neighborhood. And he made damn sure to repeat it. Influencers don’t repeat something by accident. Repetition is a tactic. It’s how you plant an idea into millions of minds without ever openly endorsing the idea. It’s how you signal the paranoid unstable guys in your audience without saying their name. This is how it works: Say it once and it’s a detail. Say it twice and it’s emphasis. Say it three or four times and it becomes a suggestion. He hammers the same points again and again: “She has no security.” “She doesn’t give a s*** about her security.” “She’s got a four foot wall and one fat guy.” “No wall no barrier suburban neighborhood.” “She’s lying about all this.” “You told me she had no security.” Why keep returning to that? Why drill it in with that level of detail? Why paint such a vivid picture of her house and her level of protection? Because this wasn’t commentary. This was "Stochastic Intimidation." That’s the academic term for when someone uses a large platform to hint at a target’s vulnerability hoping one of their unhinged followers “connects the dots.” It gives the speaker deniability while putting the target in real danger. Tim Pool has millions of followers. He knows the parasocial dynamic. He knows how many of his viewers treat him like a leader or a father figure. He knows unstable people latch onto repeated cues. So when he repeats someone’s security setup like a GPS readout he isn’t “just talking.” He is broadcasting a weak point to an audience that contains a non-zero number of obsessives conspiracy addicts and lonely guys desperate to impress him. He even framed it as inside information: “You told me you went to her house.” “She has no security.” “She doesn’t care.” “She’s lying.” This gives his words the weight of clarification, not speculation. It makes listeners feel like they’ve learned a secret. That’s how you activate a mob without calling for one. That’s how you dox-by-proxy. That’s how you throw a match without holding it long enough to get blamed for the fire. When someone with Tim’s reach keeps broadcasting security info about a woman he’s feuding with he stops being a commentator. He becomes a liability in a beanie feeding breadcrumbs to the wrong people. Candace Owens has plenty of critics. She’s used to heat. That’s normal for someone in her line of work. But what Tim did is not normal. You don’t repeat someone’s home security setup to millions of people unless you’re trying to make sure the right kind of listener hears it. This wasn’t outrage. It wasn’t debate. It was a signal. And anyone who’s been around internet culture long enough recognizes the tactic when they see it.
1:37

Tim Pool rant about Candace Owens wasn’t just a meltdown. It was something far more calculated and far more dangerous. Anyone who’s watched enough online drama knows the difference between venting and engineering a message. Tim wasn’t venting. He was building a breadcrumb trail. Every few minutes he kept circling back to one topic that had nothing to do with his supposed argument: Candace Owens’ home security. Not her politics Not her commentary Not her feud with him Her security. Her house. Her lack of walls. Her one guard. Her neighborhood. And he made damn sure to repeat it. Influencers don’t repeat something by accident. Repetition is a tactic. It’s how you plant an idea into millions of minds without ever openly endorsing the idea. It’s how you signal the paranoid unstable guys in your audience without saying their name. This is how it works: Say it once and it’s a detail. Say it twice and it’s emphasis. Say it three or four times and it becomes a suggestion. He hammers the same points again and again: “She has no security.” “She doesn’t give a s*** about her security.” “She’s got a four foot wall and one fat guy.” “No wall no barrier suburban neighborhood.” “She’s lying about all this.” “You told me she had no security.” Why keep returning to that? Why drill it in with that level of detail? Why paint such a vivid picture of her house and her level of protection? Because this wasn’t commentary. This was "Stochastic Intimidation." That’s the academic term for when someone uses a large platform to hint at a target’s vulnerability hoping one of their unhinged followers “connects the dots.” It gives the speaker deniability while putting the target in real danger. Tim Pool has millions of followers. He knows the parasocial dynamic. He knows how many of his viewers treat him like a leader or a father figure. He knows unstable people latch onto repeated cues. So when he repeats someone’s security setup like a GPS readout he isn’t “just talking.” He is broadcasting a weak point to an audience that contains a non-zero number of obsessives conspiracy addicts and lonely guys desperate to impress him. He even framed it as inside information: “You told me you went to her house.” “She has no security.” “She doesn’t care.” “She’s lying.” This gives his words the weight of clarification, not speculation. It makes listeners feel like they’ve learned a secret. That’s how you activate a mob without calling for one. That’s how you dox-by-proxy. That’s how you throw a match without holding it long enough to get blamed for the fire. When someone with Tim’s reach keeps broadcasting security info about a woman he’s feuding with he stops being a commentator. He becomes a liability in a beanie feeding breadcrumbs to the wrong people. Candace Owens has plenty of critics. She’s used to heat. That’s normal for someone in her line of work. But what Tim did is not normal. You don’t repeat someone’s home security setup to millions of people unless you’re trying to make sure the right kind of listener hears it. This wasn’t outrage. It wasn’t debate. It was a signal. And anyone who’s been around internet culture long enough recognizes the tactic when they see it.

Mr. Gerald Wayne

99,263 views • 7 months ago

These women rented an Airbnb, the owner of the home demanded a $500 security deposit. The women reluctantly agree and they ask the owner if they will get the money back after they leave. The women clarify, and ask him if they will get the full amount they put down and if it worked as a true security deposit. The owner said no, they would only get some of it back because he uses the security deposit he charges to pay for the utilities that they consume, mainly electricity and gas. The women feel like they are being scammed and only want to pay for the day they were in it instead of an extended visit as they originally planned. If we stay at a hotel, we pay one price for the room, they don’t charge us for the water for showers and electricity to charge our phones. So do you think the owner was and has been scamming people with his security deposit?
1:54

These women rented an Airbnb, the owner of the home demanded a $500 security deposit. The women reluctantly agree and they ask the owner if they will get the money back after they leave. The women clarify, and ask him if they will get the full amount they put down and if it worked as a true security deposit. The owner said no, they would only get some of it back because he uses the security deposit he charges to pay for the utilities that they consume, mainly electricity and gas. The women feel like they are being scammed and only want to pay for the day they were in it instead of an extended visit as they originally planned. If we stay at a hotel, we pay one price for the room, they don’t charge us for the water for showers and electricity to charge our phones. So do you think the owner was and has been scamming people with his security deposit?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

1,868,157 views • 4 months ago

I just interviewed a guy who did $100,000 in his first 100 days placing overseas talent with blue collar business owners. He started with $200. No tech background. No recruiting experience. His entire tech stack to launch the company was QuickBooks, Wi-Fi, a computer, and Lovable. That's it. What does he do? He runs a staffing agency that connects plumbers, electricians, and landscapers with full-time admins and marketers from Latin America. The talent costs the business owner around $1,200 to $1,600 a month full-time. He charges his clients $4,500 to $5,200 one time to make the placement. Then he offers a $200 a month membership for ongoing support. 75% of his clients pay for the membership. In this episode Alex: - Breaks down exactly how he finds great overseas talent on LinkedIn and Facebook - Shows the specific interview questions he asks to spot reliability before he ever hires - Walks through how to close your first client with a three-sentence text - Explains why 90% of his placements are brand new hires, not replacements for somebody who got fired - Gives the exact payment tools and onboarding process he uses with every client This one was really good!
1:48

I just interviewed a guy who did $100,000 in his first 100 days placing overseas talent with blue collar business owners. He started with $200. No tech background. No recruiting experience. His entire tech stack to launch the company was QuickBooks, Wi-Fi, a computer, and Lovable. That's it. What does he do? He runs a staffing agency that connects plumbers, electricians, and landscapers with full-time admins and marketers from Latin America. The talent costs the business owner around $1,200 to $1,600 a month full-time. He charges his clients $4,500 to $5,200 one time to make the placement. Then he offers a $200 a month membership for ongoing support. 75% of his clients pay for the membership. In this episode Alex: - Breaks down exactly how he finds great overseas talent on LinkedIn and Facebook - Shows the specific interview questions he asks to spot reliability before he ever hires - Walks through how to close your first client with a three-sentence text - Explains why 90% of his placements are brand new hires, not replacements for somebody who got fired - Gives the exact payment tools and onboarding process he uses with every client This one was really good!

Chris Koerner

118,082 views • 1 month ago