Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

this WHITEBOARD explainer just leveled up. now it's a real person standing at the board, lip-synced, actually writing while she talks her eyes stay on the board the whole time she's mid-stroke, only glancing at the camera between marks. that one detail is what makes it read as a...

ladprofit's profile picture

Lad

2,552 subscribers

75,555 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieBildungComedy
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

the whiteboard ad just became a PIXAR movie holding a pointer stick instead of a marker, same persona, same script, same product the board doesn't come pre-written anymore either. content appears live as she talks, the stick literally leads each word into existence at its tip before the text shows up quick workflow: - locked the same persona as an animated pixar character, same script, same product - built the board as a progressive reveal instead of fully written upfront, synced to the exact line being spoken - frame-chained all 3 clips the same way as the live-action version, last frame becomes the next clip's anchor - locked the voice across clips the same way too, timbre only, dialogue never repeats the one thing that took the most fixing: getting the stick to point at the right spot low on the board. RT + reply 'PIXAR' and i'll send you the full doc, every prompt, every fix (must follow so i can DM)
0:41

the whiteboard ad just became a PIXAR movie holding a pointer stick instead of a marker, same persona, same script, same product the board doesn't come pre-written anymore either. content appears live as she talks, the stick literally leads each word into existence at its tip before the text shows up quick workflow: - locked the same persona as an animated pixar character, same script, same product - built the board as a progressive reveal instead of fully written upfront, synced to the exact line being spoken - frame-chained all 3 clips the same way as the live-action version, last frame becomes the next clip's anchor - locked the voice across clips the same way too, timbre only, dialogue never repeats the one thing that took the most fixing: getting the stick to point at the right spot low on the board. RT + reply 'PIXAR' and i'll send you the full doc, every prompt, every fix (must follow so i can DM)

Lad

29,199 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

i built a way to generate realistic AI influencer vlogs without ever touching a camera. this was supposed to stay internal but f*ck it, i'm leaking the entire production system. pick any topic. or paste in a script. a few minutes later you've got a finished influencer-style vlog with: > a consistent AI character > cinematic shots > natural dialogue > realistic iPhone footage > b-roll here's how it works: the workflow first breaks your script into a complete scene-by-scene storyboard with timestamps, camera directions, dialogue, environments, pacing, and shot planning so every clip has a purpose instead of feeling randomly generated. each scene gets its own reference image prompt for Higgsfield that locks the character's identity, clothing, camera angle, lighting, and environment to keep the person looking the same across the entire vlog. those reference images are then animated in Seedance 2.5 using scene-specific prompts that control movement, lip sync, ambient audio, dialogue, camera motion, and timing so every clip feels like it was filmed on an iPhone instead of generated by AI. finally everything gets assembled in CapCut with b-roll, subtitles, transitions, music, pacing, and final polish into a complete vlog that's ready to upload. you're not filming,hiring actors or recording voiceovers. the whole thing goes from idea → finished AI influencer vlog. the document i'm sharing includes: > the complete scene breakdown framework > every Higgsfield image prompt > every Seedance 2.5 animation prompt > dialogue for every scene > b-roll prompts > editing workflow inside capcut > structural notes that make the vlog feel real instead of AI RT + reply "AI VLOG", i'll DM you the entire production blueprint.(must be following so i can DM.)
2:30

i built a way to generate realistic AI influencer vlogs without ever touching a camera. this was supposed to stay internal but f*ck it, i'm leaking the entire production system. pick any topic. or paste in a script. a few minutes later you've got a finished influencer-style vlog with: > a consistent AI character > cinematic shots > natural dialogue > realistic iPhone footage > b-roll here's how it works: the workflow first breaks your script into a complete scene-by-scene storyboard with timestamps, camera directions, dialogue, environments, pacing, and shot planning so every clip has a purpose instead of feeling randomly generated. each scene gets its own reference image prompt for Higgsfield that locks the character's identity, clothing, camera angle, lighting, and environment to keep the person looking the same across the entire vlog. those reference images are then animated in Seedance 2.5 using scene-specific prompts that control movement, lip sync, ambient audio, dialogue, camera motion, and timing so every clip feels like it was filmed on an iPhone instead of generated by AI. finally everything gets assembled in CapCut with b-roll, subtitles, transitions, music, pacing, and final polish into a complete vlog that's ready to upload. you're not filming,hiring actors or recording voiceovers. the whole thing goes from idea → finished AI influencer vlog. the document i'm sharing includes: > the complete scene breakdown framework > every Higgsfield image prompt > every Seedance 2.5 animation prompt > dialogue for every scene > b-roll prompts > editing workflow inside capcut > structural notes that make the vlog feel real instead of AI RT + reply "AI VLOG", i'll DM you the entire production blueprint.(must be following so i can DM.)

Sulfur

72,892 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

google flow + claude + gpt image is actually f*cking cracked i figured out how to lock one AI character across an entire video. same face, same voice, same outfit, every single shot. zero drift. everyone making AI video right now hits the same wall. the character looks different in every clip so you can never tell an actual story. you get 5 second clips, not films. the fix isn't better prompting. it's building the character ONCE before you ever touch video, then referencing it everywhere. here's the workflow: > build the character inside Flow's character section, not a per-clip prompt > design the voice + personality one time and reuse it across every clip > generate a full turnaround sheet (Claude writes the prompt, GPT image renders the angles) > pull the character into any scene with a single @ tag > ingredients vs frames: when to let a shot float vs lock it to your source image > the end-frame loop that chains 4-10 sec clips into one seamless scene > stitch + trim in the timeline editor and export the whole thing as one film i packaged the entire thing. every prompt, the exact tool order, the character sheet template, and the continuity loop nobody actually explains. RT + reply "FLOW" and i'll send it over (must be following so i can dm)
0:25

google flow + claude + gpt image is actually f*cking cracked i figured out how to lock one AI character across an entire video. same face, same voice, same outfit, every single shot. zero drift. everyone making AI video right now hits the same wall. the character looks different in every clip so you can never tell an actual story. you get 5 second clips, not films. the fix isn't better prompting. it's building the character ONCE before you ever touch video, then referencing it everywhere. here's the workflow: > build the character inside Flow's character section, not a per-clip prompt > design the voice + personality one time and reuse it across every clip > generate a full turnaround sheet (Claude writes the prompt, GPT image renders the angles) > pull the character into any scene with a single @ tag > ingredients vs frames: when to let a shot float vs lock it to your source image > the end-frame loop that chains 4-10 sec clips into one seamless scene > stitch + trim in the timeline editor and export the whole thing as one film i packaged the entire thing. every prompt, the exact tool order, the character sheet template, and the continuity loop nobody actually explains. RT + reply "FLOW" and i'll send it over (must be following so i can dm)

Sulfur

35,672 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

i built a way to make full ai films with seedance 2.5 + higgsfield without shooting a single frame in real life you start with a screenplay, a treatment, or even just an idea and it gives you an actual production plan: scenes, shots, character references, locations, dialogue, b-roll, sound, captions, everything you need to turn it into a finished film this was supposed to stay internal but f*ck it, i’m sharing the whole workflow here’s how it works: the script gets broken down scene by scene, then every scene gets turned into a proper shot list with prompts that account for character continuity, wardrobe, lighting, locations, camera movement, pacing, and what needs to happen before and after that shot those prompts get run through seedance 2.5, using reference assets and longer generations to keep the film feeling like one world instead of a thousand random ai clips stitched together then the footage gets assembled with voice, sound design, music, dialogue, captions, and transitions into an actual watchable film the whole system is built to take you from script to a finished film seedance 2.5 is coming soon on higgsfield, but i’m sharing the full breakdown before it so you can be prepared: the script-to-scene system that turns a screenplay into a real production plan seedance 2.5 prompt setup for cinematic shots and consistent characters the reference-asset workflow for keeping faces, wardrobe, locations, and visual style locked in the editing, voice, sound, and caption workflow that turns generated clips into a finished movie RT + reply “FILM” and (i’ll send it over must follow so i can dm)
0:39

i built a way to make full ai films with seedance 2.5 + higgsfield without shooting a single frame in real life you start with a screenplay, a treatment, or even just an idea and it gives you an actual production plan: scenes, shots, character references, locations, dialogue, b-roll, sound, captions, everything you need to turn it into a finished film this was supposed to stay internal but f*ck it, i’m sharing the whole workflow here’s how it works: the script gets broken down scene by scene, then every scene gets turned into a proper shot list with prompts that account for character continuity, wardrobe, lighting, locations, camera movement, pacing, and what needs to happen before and after that shot those prompts get run through seedance 2.5, using reference assets and longer generations to keep the film feeling like one world instead of a thousand random ai clips stitched together then the footage gets assembled with voice, sound design, music, dialogue, captions, and transitions into an actual watchable film the whole system is built to take you from script to a finished film seedance 2.5 is coming soon on higgsfield, but i’m sharing the full breakdown before it so you can be prepared: the script-to-scene system that turns a screenplay into a real production plan seedance 2.5 prompt setup for cinematic shots and consistent characters the reference-asset workflow for keeping faces, wardrobe, locations, and visual style locked in the editing, voice, sound, and caption workflow that turns generated clips into a finished movie RT + reply “FILM” and (i’ll send it over must follow so i can dm)

Sulfur

48,621 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Every trader thinks the hard part is predicting the future. an Argentine mathematician proved on a chalkboard in Rio that the opposite is true, and it is the reason most of them blow up. her field is stochastic programming. the idea is cold and simple: you will never know what tomorrow does, so stop guessing it and find the one decision that survives every version of it. that is position sizing. that is bankroll. that is the whole game. this is not chalk-dust theory. EDF and Petrobras handed her the real thing, decide now, pay for it when the future shows up, billions on the line. she solved it for them, then gave the method to a room full of strangers for nothing. go to the middle of the board. she takes a future no one can forecast, cuts it into scenarios, and lands on the single move that wins across all of them at once. there is no prediction anywhere in it. I put the practical aspects of this lecture into practice and developed a strategy that generates income, the results surprised me. 22 days. $100 → $24,600. 76% win rate. Sharpe 2.45. I'm giving away the full configuration of my bot for free. 24 hours only. Here's how: >Like and Follow me >Send me a direct message with the word “Bot” All you need to do to get the information is send me a single word!
1:26:32

Every trader thinks the hard part is predicting the future. an Argentine mathematician proved on a chalkboard in Rio that the opposite is true, and it is the reason most of them blow up. her field is stochastic programming. the idea is cold and simple: you will never know what tomorrow does, so stop guessing it and find the one decision that survives every version of it. that is position sizing. that is bankroll. that is the whole game. this is not chalk-dust theory. EDF and Petrobras handed her the real thing, decide now, pay for it when the future shows up, billions on the line. she solved it for them, then gave the method to a room full of strangers for nothing. go to the middle of the board. she takes a future no one can forecast, cuts it into scenarios, and lands on the single move that wins across all of them at once. there is no prediction anywhere in it. I put the practical aspects of this lecture into practice and developed a strategy that generates income, the results surprised me. 22 days. $100 → $24,600. 76% win rate. Sharpe 2.45. I'm giving away the full configuration of my bot for free. 24 hours only. Here's how: >Like and Follow me >Send me a direct message with the word “Bot” All you need to do to get the information is send me a single word!

Voltex

34,888 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

We're changing up our editorial process for the PFF big boards and mock draft sim this year to make things on both ends as genuine and realistic as possible. The way we've done that is by separating my personal big board from the one the MDS will run off. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN: The video below shows how to understand and navigate PFF's big boards page properly. When you go to the landing page, the first big board you will see will be our new "PFF's 2026 Predictive Board". This is the board the MDS will run off, and currently has 449 prospects ranked for you to draft (the top 255 have been personally ranked by me with the rest of the names gathered from All-Star Bowl watch lists with early consensus thoughts taken into player placement). The purpose of this board is to give us the freedom to let the MDS be as realistic as possible, even if we/I don't see a player as high or as low as the NFL might. This board will be updated weekly throughout the college football season, and then continuously throughout draft season. If you go to the right side of the screen you will see a setting button labeled "sources". If you click that you can go over to the "version" tab and see my personal big board to click and load. I will never have a player on my board who I have not personally watched. Right now there are 255 ranked on my board with many more coming with every passing week. I'll also do plenty of re-checks throughout the year to make it as up-to-date as possible. As stated before, this new process allows me to be as genuine as possible with my personal rankings while giving PFF subscribers enhanced realism and depth when using the MDS at any point of the year. Hope y'all enjoy the changes, and happy drafting!
0:20

We're changing up our editorial process for the PFF big boards and mock draft sim this year to make things on both ends as genuine and realistic as possible. The way we've done that is by separating my personal big board from the one the MDS will run off. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN: The video below shows how to understand and navigate PFF's big boards page properly. When you go to the landing page, the first big board you will see will be our new "PFF's 2026 Predictive Board". This is the board the MDS will run off, and currently has 449 prospects ranked for you to draft (the top 255 have been personally ranked by me with the rest of the names gathered from All-Star Bowl watch lists with early consensus thoughts taken into player placement). The purpose of this board is to give us the freedom to let the MDS be as realistic as possible, even if we/I don't see a player as high or as low as the NFL might. This board will be updated weekly throughout the college football season, and then continuously throughout draft season. If you go to the right side of the screen you will see a setting button labeled "sources". If you click that you can go over to the "version" tab and see my personal big board to click and load. I will never have a player on my board who I have not personally watched. Right now there are 255 ranked on my board with many more coming with every passing week. I'll also do plenty of re-checks throughout the year to make it as up-to-date as possible. As stated before, this new process allows me to be as genuine as possible with my personal rankings while giving PFF subscribers enhanced realism and depth when using the MDS at any point of the year. Hope y'all enjoy the changes, and happy drafting!

Trevor Sikkema

219,624 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

the best AD FORMAT i've seen in months came from scrolling past dave ramsey on instagram a call-in advice show. authoritative host behind a desk takes a live call from a woman who can't sleep, diagnoses her problem on air, and recommends the fix with the kind of quiet confidence that makes you forget you're watching an ad quick workflow: - generated a single studio shot of the host at his desk and used it as the identity lock for all six clips - the caller is audio-only through his headset, so there's no second face to keep consistent across cuts - wrote full performance direction into every Omni prompt: the southern drawl, the listening beats where his mouth stays shut, the product pickup - rendered all six clips and stitched in CapCut, nothing reshot the format works because the host sounds like he's run this show for twenty years, and the caller's exhaustion is relatable RT + reply 'DAVE' and i'll send you the full workflow (must follow so i can dm)
0:40

the best AD FORMAT i've seen in months came from scrolling past dave ramsey on instagram a call-in advice show. authoritative host behind a desk takes a live call from a woman who can't sleep, diagnoses her problem on air, and recommends the fix with the kind of quiet confidence that makes you forget you're watching an ad quick workflow: - generated a single studio shot of the host at his desk and used it as the identity lock for all six clips - the caller is audio-only through his headset, so there's no second face to keep consistent across cuts - wrote full performance direction into every Omni prompt: the southern drawl, the listening beats where his mouth stays shut, the product pickup - rendered all six clips and stitched in CapCut, nothing reshot the format works because the host sounds like he's run this show for twenty years, and the caller's exhaustion is relatable RT + reply 'DAVE' and i'll send you the full workflow (must follow so i can dm)

Lad

101,678 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

ANTHROPIC LEAKED 8 RULES THAT GIVE ONE ENGINEER 8X FROM A SINGLE CHANGE the engineers built it so nothing adds up - it multiplies, and that's the 8x task → split → verify → score → write back one queue means you wait for every step in turn - three workers together cost you the slowest one, not the sum of all. as long as you're the one reading the diff, the bottleneck is you, not the model. state is written at every step - a crash mid-run costs you one step, not the whole session. history gets compressed 25 times over - the next pass starts at 8k instead of 200k. nothing moves forward without a number - "it got better" isn't a result, and the breakage comes back when you're no longer watching. the eighth rule is the only one that writes back into CLAUDE.md - the agent records what it learned, and the next run doesn't start from zero. copy this into Claude Code today - and tomorrow you work like an engineer on $1.5M a year ↓
1:05

ANTHROPIC LEAKED 8 RULES THAT GIVE ONE ENGINEER 8X FROM A SINGLE CHANGE the engineers built it so nothing adds up - it multiplies, and that's the 8x task → split → verify → score → write back one queue means you wait for every step in turn - three workers together cost you the slowest one, not the sum of all. as long as you're the one reading the diff, the bottleneck is you, not the model. state is written at every step - a crash mid-run costs you one step, not the whole session. history gets compressed 25 times over - the next pass starts at 8k instead of 200k. nothing moves forward without a number - "it got better" isn't a result, and the breakage comes back when you're no longer watching. the eighth rule is the only one that writes back into CLAUDE.md - the agent records what it learned, and the next run doesn't start from zero. copy this into Claude Code today - and tomorrow you work like an engineer on $1.5M a year ↓

Noisy

37,058 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

This woman was out for a jog with her dog on the Appalachian trail. She pulls out her camera to document a tree that was recently uprooted when she hears a woman’s voice. She quickly recites one of the rules for Appalachia and she immediately makes a run to the car so she can leave. I never knew the rules applied during the day time as well, I always thought that was only for at night, would you have left as well, or just thought it was another person enjoying the trail?
0:27

This woman was out for a jog with her dog on the Appalachian trail. She pulls out her camera to document a tree that was recently uprooted when she hears a woman’s voice. She quickly recites one of the rules for Appalachia and she immediately makes a run to the car so she can leave. I never knew the rules applied during the day time as well, I always thought that was only for at night, would you have left as well, or just thought it was another person enjoying the trail?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

4,562,496 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

14 Year Old EXPOSES Overpaid Corrupt Superintendent & School Board. Tax Payers Are Getting Destroyed - Superintendent Making $400k Per Year - Every Councilor $100k Per Year - Every Principal $100k Per Year - Every Media Specialist $100k Per Year - Every Director $100k Per Year - Every coordinator $100k Per Year - Every Supervisor $100k Per Year “According to a chart on Chippewa Valley Schools' own website, every single teacher in the district is making well over $100,000 per year. So is every counselor, principal, media specialist, director, coordinator, and supervisor, it seems the only ones not making over a $100,000 are the lunch ladies. At the November meeting, I outed superintendent Robert's salary for of almost $400,000, which is nearly as much as the US president. With these types of salaries, parents should expect extremely high proficiency scores and academic excellence, but that's not the case. More money it does not equal better education. Proficiency scores are as low as 20% in this district. Chippewa Valley High School is ranked 3 you're 84th out of 7 hun 735 Michigan high schools. In 2018, your average standard score it was 59.42 but went down to 21.68 last year. Your Michigan State percentile is only 18%, meaning 82% of Michigan students scored better on standardized tests than those at Chippewa Valley, you have a one star rating on the largest school evaluation website, and you're failing your special needs students too. Their score is only the 12th, and their Michigan state percentile is now only 3.4%, which is 0 stars on the rating website. Some of you have been on this board for years and things have gotten worse in this district. One thing has remained unchanged since to 2011, and that's mister Roberts being superintendent. Every parent in this district should be asking campus board, why is mister Roberts still the superintendent here? Another question is, why is mister Roberts running these board meetings? Why is he blocking controlling information to a board member, he's not a member of this board. Things have gotten really con convoluted here and boundaries have been crossed. The school board is the governing body of the school district, and mister Roberts is only an advisor to this board. Mister Pearl, as board President, it's actually your job to preside over and conduct these meetings, not the superintendent. Mister Roberts should not even be speaking unless giving a report on district issues or if a question is posed to him. And he definitely does not have the authority County to control information or access or ban specific board members from anything. So, mister Pearl, why are you allowing the superintendent to usurp your authority at these meetings? Maybe you shouldn't be the board president. So no wonder this District is failing, you can't even conduct a school board meeting correctly. It's a new year now and time for a new direction for the sport. Put student academic success at your priority, and start following proper procedures in the schools for these meetings. Thank you.”
3:32

14 Year Old EXPOSES Overpaid Corrupt Superintendent & School Board. Tax Payers Are Getting Destroyed - Superintendent Making $400k Per Year - Every Councilor $100k Per Year - Every Principal $100k Per Year - Every Media Specialist $100k Per Year - Every Director $100k Per Year - Every coordinator $100k Per Year - Every Supervisor $100k Per Year “According to a chart on Chippewa Valley Schools' own website, every single teacher in the district is making well over $100,000 per year. So is every counselor, principal, media specialist, director, coordinator, and supervisor, it seems the only ones not making over a $100,000 are the lunch ladies. At the November meeting, I outed superintendent Robert's salary for of almost $400,000, which is nearly as much as the US president. With these types of salaries, parents should expect extremely high proficiency scores and academic excellence, but that's not the case. More money it does not equal better education. Proficiency scores are as low as 20% in this district. Chippewa Valley High School is ranked 3 you're 84th out of 7 hun 735 Michigan high schools. In 2018, your average standard score it was 59.42 but went down to 21.68 last year. Your Michigan State percentile is only 18%, meaning 82% of Michigan students scored better on standardized tests than those at Chippewa Valley, you have a one star rating on the largest school evaluation website, and you're failing your special needs students too. Their score is only the 12th, and their Michigan state percentile is now only 3.4%, which is 0 stars on the rating website. Some of you have been on this board for years and things have gotten worse in this district. One thing has remained unchanged since to 2011, and that's mister Roberts being superintendent. Every parent in this district should be asking campus board, why is mister Roberts still the superintendent here? Another question is, why is mister Roberts running these board meetings? Why is he blocking controlling information to a board member, he's not a member of this board. Things have gotten really con convoluted here and boundaries have been crossed. The school board is the governing body of the school district, and mister Roberts is only an advisor to this board. Mister Pearl, as board President, it's actually your job to preside over and conduct these meetings, not the superintendent. Mister Roberts should not even be speaking unless giving a report on district issues or if a question is posed to him. And he definitely does not have the authority County to control information or access or ban specific board members from anything. So, mister Pearl, why are you allowing the superintendent to usurp your authority at these meetings? Maybe you shouldn't be the board president. So no wonder this District is failing, you can't even conduct a school board meeting correctly. It's a new year now and time for a new direction for the sport. Put student academic success at your priority, and start following proper procedures in the schools for these meetings. Thank you.”

Wall Street Apes

1,304,880 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨TPUSA admits Bowyer's board service IS the payment. That's the disclosed arrangement. The nonprofit gets a discount. Bowyer gives his time. Deal done. So if Bowyer's board service IS the compensation structure... and Bowyer works for TPUSA during business hours... then TPUSA is functionally subsidizing Superfeed's board with donor money. 🚨 Superfeed gets a functioning board chairman. For free. Paid for by conservative donors who have no idea. And what does Superfeed get beyond a chairman? The data. That's the only other thing flowing in this deal. There's no disclosed cash payment from Superfeed to TPUSA. No royalty. No revenue share on the IP they own. They own the IP. They take the data. Bowyer's time is the fee. 👀 Here's the version of the post with that question centered: 😒 Superfeed Technologies owns the intellectual property for Early Vote Action. TPUSA is one of their biggest clients. Tyler Bowyer is TPUSA's COO and Superfeed's board chairman at the same time. A TPUSA spokesman admitted on record that the nonprofit gets a "discount" on Superfeed services "in exchange for" Bowyer's board service. They said that to a reporter. Openly. That is a documented quid pro quo. 😤 So here is the question nobody is asking. If Superfeed isn't getting paid cash and Bowyer's board time IS the exchange... who is actually paying for Bowyer's time? TPUSA donors are. Conservative grassroots donors are subsidizing Superfeed's board of directors. 🤯 So what does Superfeed actually get out of this deal? The data‼️ 📲The App Store privacy disclosure for Early Vote Action says collected data "may be used to track you across apps and websites owned by other companies." Names. Contacts. Location data. Political preferences. All of it flowing through an app Superfeed owns the IP on. And the backend? Built by nCube Software in Kyiv, Ukraine. Active warzone. Active Russian military operations next door. 💀 Lori Frantzve, Charlie Kirk's mother-in-law and a defense contractor with critical infrastructure vulnerability patents, also sits on Superfeed's board. Two Kirk-connected board seats. One data company. Zero public scrutiny. ❌ In 2022 Superfeed had its Arizona business authority revoked. Could not pay basic state fees. Was employing Kari Lake and Jeff DeWit at the time. This is the company trusted with millions of conservative voter records. 😳 Nobody audited it. Nobody ran penetration tests. Nobody asked who holds repo credentials in Kyiv right now. Bowyer's time was the price. The data was the prize. Does that sound like a technology partnership to you or does it sound like something else? 👀 Watch the breakdown below. Drop in the comments your thoughts on if...⬇️ This should trigger a federal counterintelligence referral... or something else entirely? NOTHING at all? What's your take? 👇
0:59

🚨TPUSA admits Bowyer's board service IS the payment. That's the disclosed arrangement. The nonprofit gets a discount. Bowyer gives his time. Deal done. So if Bowyer's board service IS the compensation structure... and Bowyer works for TPUSA during business hours... then TPUSA is functionally subsidizing Superfeed's board with donor money. 🚨 Superfeed gets a functioning board chairman. For free. Paid for by conservative donors who have no idea. And what does Superfeed get beyond a chairman? The data. That's the only other thing flowing in this deal. There's no disclosed cash payment from Superfeed to TPUSA. No royalty. No revenue share on the IP they own. They own the IP. They take the data. Bowyer's time is the fee. 👀 Here's the version of the post with that question centered: 😒 Superfeed Technologies owns the intellectual property for Early Vote Action. TPUSA is one of their biggest clients. Tyler Bowyer is TPUSA's COO and Superfeed's board chairman at the same time. A TPUSA spokesman admitted on record that the nonprofit gets a "discount" on Superfeed services "in exchange for" Bowyer's board service. They said that to a reporter. Openly. That is a documented quid pro quo. 😤 So here is the question nobody is asking. If Superfeed isn't getting paid cash and Bowyer's board time IS the exchange... who is actually paying for Bowyer's time? TPUSA donors are. Conservative grassroots donors are subsidizing Superfeed's board of directors. 🤯 So what does Superfeed actually get out of this deal? The data‼️ 📲The App Store privacy disclosure for Early Vote Action says collected data "may be used to track you across apps and websites owned by other companies." Names. Contacts. Location data. Political preferences. All of it flowing through an app Superfeed owns the IP on. And the backend? Built by nCube Software in Kyiv, Ukraine. Active warzone. Active Russian military operations next door. 💀 Lori Frantzve, Charlie Kirk's mother-in-law and a defense contractor with critical infrastructure vulnerability patents, also sits on Superfeed's board. Two Kirk-connected board seats. One data company. Zero public scrutiny. ❌ In 2022 Superfeed had its Arizona business authority revoked. Could not pay basic state fees. Was employing Kari Lake and Jeff DeWit at the time. This is the company trusted with millions of conservative voter records. 😳 Nobody audited it. Nobody ran penetration tests. Nobody asked who holds repo credentials in Kyiv right now. Bowyer's time was the price. The data was the prize. Does that sound like a technology partnership to you or does it sound like something else? 👀 Watch the breakdown below. Drop in the comments your thoughts on if...⬇️ This should trigger a federal counterintelligence referral... or something else entirely? NOTHING at all? What's your take? 👇

Danks

15,361 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Candace Owens attempted to pull off the MOST RIDICULOUS double down of all time on today’s show !!! Her Fort Huachuca story has completely FALLEN APART right before our eyes. But instead of letting it go… Candace had a BRIGHT idea 💡 The idea !? Now that everyone Mitch claimed to see has provided an alibi to prove they weren’t there… Candace is REPLACING them with people who she says look the same. So when one person DEBUNKS her and provides PROOF they weren’t at Fort Huachuca she just blames an entirely new person linked to TPUSA for being at Fort Huachuca. AND OF COURSE… Her fake “whistleblower” is all the way on board. All she has to do is send him a picture and SUDDENLY HE REMEMBERS also seeing that person at Fort Huachuca. It’s all so obviously FAKE and ridiculous. But this is the BEST she could come up with in the two weeks she took off from her show.
0:39

Candace Owens attempted to pull off the MOST RIDICULOUS double down of all time on today’s show !!! Her Fort Huachuca story has completely FALLEN APART right before our eyes. But instead of letting it go… Candace had a BRIGHT idea 💡 The idea !? Now that everyone Mitch claimed to see has provided an alibi to prove they weren’t there… Candace is REPLACING them with people who she says look the same. So when one person DEBUNKS her and provides PROOF they weren’t at Fort Huachuca she just blames an entirely new person linked to TPUSA for being at Fort Huachuca. AND OF COURSE… Her fake “whistleblower” is all the way on board. All she has to do is send him a picture and SUDDENLY HE REMEMBERS also seeing that person at Fort Huachuca. It’s all so obviously FAKE and ridiculous. But this is the BEST she could come up with in the two weeks she took off from her show.

Cinema Shogun

50,040 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

the one thing i am most impressed about agents is how they can run the full production like if they were a big team they start the script and i see how they are surgically working on each part and validate at each stage... there is a researcher, there is a guy that iterates on the hook until it is perfect, it gives scores for each part, and won't jump into the next part until approved then it gets passed to another agent who takes care of the storyboard... this guy then sends it to another guy who create the visuals, another one who is an expert cinematographer, and so on... all this happening in front of my eyes, a team working together with minimal human input, and the only part i have to take care of, is the part i enjoy the most which is the visuals
0:20

the one thing i am most impressed about agents is how they can run the full production like if they were a big team they start the script and i see how they are surgically working on each part and validate at each stage... there is a researcher, there is a guy that iterates on the hook until it is perfect, it gives scores for each part, and won't jump into the next part until approved then it gets passed to another agent who takes care of the storyboard... this guy then sends it to another guy who create the visuals, another one who is an expert cinematographer, and so on... all this happening in front of my eyes, a team working together with minimal human input, and the only part i have to take care of, is the part i enjoy the most which is the visuals

Boring Always Bored

38,908 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

I just cracked the code on AI UGC ads 🤯 51 seconds long. One creator across the entire ad: same face, same voice, same product packaging in every single shot. Talking-head delivery, b-roll cutaways, voiceover running over the b-roll, and the creator moving through different settings. A fully edited, multi-shot ad that actually holds. If you've been stuck generating 8-second clips that look fine but fall apart the second you try to string them into a real ad, no character that holds, no voice that stays the same clip to clip, no product that survives more than one shot, this is the workflow you're missing. Here's exactly how I did it: → Pull a winning authority ad and rewrite the script for your product → Build your creator in ChatGPT Images 2.0 to match the exact buyer demographic → Lock the creator + product as reusable Elements so they stay identical across every shot → Break the script into single-scene shots so each one is a clean generation → Lock the voice on the first clip, then carry that same voice through every shot after → Tag your b-roll shots as voiceover so the line plays over the cutaway instead of lip-syncing → Edit in CapCut: cut the dead air, nudge to 1.1x → Drop the final cut in Captions, add subtitles, export Consistent character, consistent voice, consistent packaging — across talking head, b-roll, voiceover, and multiple settings. No character drift. No robotic voice swap. No disconnected 8-second clips. I put together the full step-by-step playbook with the exact ChatGPT Images 2.0 and Seedance prompts, the element-tagging setup, and the voice trick most people miss. Want it? > Like this post > Comment "UGC" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)
0:51

I just cracked the code on AI UGC ads 🤯 51 seconds long. One creator across the entire ad: same face, same voice, same product packaging in every single shot. Talking-head delivery, b-roll cutaways, voiceover running over the b-roll, and the creator moving through different settings. A fully edited, multi-shot ad that actually holds. If you've been stuck generating 8-second clips that look fine but fall apart the second you try to string them into a real ad, no character that holds, no voice that stays the same clip to clip, no product that survives more than one shot, this is the workflow you're missing. Here's exactly how I did it: → Pull a winning authority ad and rewrite the script for your product → Build your creator in ChatGPT Images 2.0 to match the exact buyer demographic → Lock the creator + product as reusable Elements so they stay identical across every shot → Break the script into single-scene shots so each one is a clean generation → Lock the voice on the first clip, then carry that same voice through every shot after → Tag your b-roll shots as voiceover so the line plays over the cutaway instead of lip-syncing → Edit in CapCut: cut the dead air, nudge to 1.1x → Drop the final cut in Captions, add subtitles, export Consistent character, consistent voice, consistent packaging — across talking head, b-roll, voiceover, and multiple settings. No character drift. No robotic voice swap. No disconnected 8-second clips. I put together the full step-by-step playbook with the exact ChatGPT Images 2.0 and Seedance prompts, the element-tagging setup, and the voice trick most people miss. Want it? > Like this post > Comment "UGC" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

37,888 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

THIS GUY CONNECTED HIS AI AGENTS TO HIS OBSIDIAN AND BUILT A BRAIN THAT LEARNS ON ITS OWN. HERE'S HOW TO BUILD IT Obsidian is just markdown files sitting in a folder. That turns out to be the perfect memory for an AI agent, because an agent can read and write those files directly. He wired his agents into the vault so they pull context from it, do the work, and write what they learned back. The notes aren't the point. The loop is, and it gets sharper every cycle How to build it: 1. Point an agent at your vault. The fastest way, no plugins, no API keys: open a terminal and run npx obsidian-mcp /path/to/your/vault. That exposes your Obsidian folder to Claude as a tool it can read, search, and write to. Add it to your Claude Code or Cowork config and restart 2. Confirm it can see the brain. Ask it: "list the notes in my vault and summarize what's in them." If it reads them back, the connection is live. Now it starts every task with everything the vault already holds instead of from zero 3. Give each agent one job and a write-back rule. Tell it: "research this, then save what you found as a new note in /brain with links to related notes." One agent researches, one summarizes, one plans. Each writes its output back into the vault 4. Close the loop. Add one line to every agent's instructions: "read /brain before starting, write your result back when done." Now each task leaves the vault richer, and the next run reads that before it works. It compounds instead of resetting 5. You only steer. Review what the brain produces, point it at the next thing. The agents handle the reading, writing, and connecting The edge isn't better notes. It's a brain that feeds itself, so the work gets sharper every cycle instead of starting over Bookmark this
0:24

THIS GUY CONNECTED HIS AI AGENTS TO HIS OBSIDIAN AND BUILT A BRAIN THAT LEARNS ON ITS OWN. HERE'S HOW TO BUILD IT Obsidian is just markdown files sitting in a folder. That turns out to be the perfect memory for an AI agent, because an agent can read and write those files directly. He wired his agents into the vault so they pull context from it, do the work, and write what they learned back. The notes aren't the point. The loop is, and it gets sharper every cycle How to build it: 1. Point an agent at your vault. The fastest way, no plugins, no API keys: open a terminal and run npx obsidian-mcp /path/to/your/vault. That exposes your Obsidian folder to Claude as a tool it can read, search, and write to. Add it to your Claude Code or Cowork config and restart 2. Confirm it can see the brain. Ask it: "list the notes in my vault and summarize what's in them." If it reads them back, the connection is live. Now it starts every task with everything the vault already holds instead of from zero 3. Give each agent one job and a write-back rule. Tell it: "research this, then save what you found as a new note in /brain with links to related notes." One agent researches, one summarizes, one plans. Each writes its output back into the vault 4. Close the loop. Add one line to every agent's instructions: "read /brain before starting, write your result back when done." Now each task leaves the vault richer, and the next run reads that before it works. It compounds instead of resetting 5. You only steer. Review what the brain produces, point it at the next thing. The agents handle the reading, writing, and connecting The edge isn't better notes. It's a brain that feeds itself, so the work gets sharper every cycle instead of starting over Bookmark this

Yarchi

58,186 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Hollywood isn't dead. It's evolving. And we're leading that evolution. We just shipped Koyal v2.5: The best Agentic AI filmmaking platform. It goes from your script or music to full video with consistent characters, settings & storylines. Large Production houses, music labels & ad agencies use koyal.ai (YC F25) for storyboarding & pre-viz. Smaller studios use it for making content they never had the time, budget or resources to create. Write a scene. Direct the camera. Build a world. koyal.ai (YC F25) brings it to life. Here's what's new: - Go from script to video: Write a scene with dialogue, pacing, emotion. Koyal fully realizes it. Using the best voice models on the planet. - Direct the camera: Push in. Pull back. Drift through a scene. Real 3D camera blocking. Shape the shot the way you see it in your head. - Build a world that stays:Lock in a location and return to it. Your scenes stay consistent from the first frame to the last. Plus: dialogue, SFX, annotations for editing, and more control over every shot. Under the hood, we benchmark 40+ models weekly with real humans so Koyal always uses the best available (more on that next week!) Our agents pick the best models for each scene in run-time so you focus on the story, we handle the complexity. You don't need to prompt a film, you can direct it. With Koyal, we're looking to replace the camera, not the filmmaker behind it. Try it now at beta [dot] koyal [dot] ai DM me for credits!
3:23

Hollywood isn't dead. It's evolving. And we're leading that evolution. We just shipped Koyal v2.5: The best Agentic AI filmmaking platform. It goes from your script or music to full video with consistent characters, settings & storylines. Large Production houses, music labels & ad agencies use koyal.ai (YC F25) for storyboarding & pre-viz. Smaller studios use it for making content they never had the time, budget or resources to create. Write a scene. Direct the camera. Build a world. koyal.ai (YC F25) brings it to life. Here's what's new: - Go from script to video: Write a scene with dialogue, pacing, emotion. Koyal fully realizes it. Using the best voice models on the planet. - Direct the camera: Push in. Pull back. Drift through a scene. Real 3D camera blocking. Shape the shot the way you see it in your head. - Build a world that stays:Lock in a location and return to it. Your scenes stay consistent from the first frame to the last. Plus: dialogue, SFX, annotations for editing, and more control over every shot. Under the hood, we benchmark 40+ models weekly with real humans so Koyal always uses the best available (more on that next week!) Our agents pick the best models for each scene in run-time so you focus on the story, we handle the complexity. You don't need to prompt a film, you can direct it. With Koyal, we're looking to replace the camera, not the filmmaker behind it. Try it now at beta [dot] koyal [dot] ai DM me for credits!

Mehul Agarwal

74,482 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Here’s the workflow I used with Seedance 2.5: - Lock the dancer, outfit and location. - Use ChatGPT to Choreograph the full sequence first, then turn it into a 12-frame storyboard. - Use the storyboard only for shot order, body positions, movement progression and camera angles. - Describe the movement between every frame: foot plant → weight transfer → body hit → recovery → next move. - Give every shot a purpose: wide for full-body choreography, low angle for footwork, close-up for isolations, tracking for travel. - Make the end pose of every shot the exact starting pose of the next. - When extending the video, use the previous video as the continuity master. Match its final pose, camera, lighting, direction and momentum before starting new choreography. - Lock the mistakes you don’t want: no teleporting, no random spins, no foot sliding, no body warping, no camera resets. . . . prompt + storyboard are shared below
0:30

Here’s the workflow I used with Seedance 2.5: - Lock the dancer, outfit and location. - Use ChatGPT to Choreograph the full sequence first, then turn it into a 12-frame storyboard. - Use the storyboard only for shot order, body positions, movement progression and camera angles. - Describe the movement between every frame: foot plant → weight transfer → body hit → recovery → next move. - Give every shot a purpose: wide for full-body choreography, low angle for footwork, close-up for isolations, tracking for travel. - Make the end pose of every shot the exact starting pose of the next. - When extending the video, use the previous video as the continuity master. Match its final pose, camera, lighting, direction and momentum before starting new choreography. - Lock the mistakes you don’t want: no teleporting, no random spins, no foot sliding, no body warping, no camera resets. . . . prompt + storyboard are shared below

Beginnersblog

79,881 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

Richard Feynman, Nobel Prize-winning physicist: "You can know the name of every pattern in the market and understand nothing about why a single one works. I won a Nobel on that one distinction. it is the whole difference between an edge and a story you tell yourself." this free film is a Nobel laureate teaching you how to actually think, recorded by the BBC and free ever since. at the board it's simple. Feynman's obsession was the gap between naming a thing and understanding it. You can memorize the word for why a stock moved, "momentum", "mean reversion", and still know nothing about whether it will happen again. Real understanding means you can say why, from the mechanism up, and name what would break it. Everything else is a label pasted over ignorance. That's the whole "edge", minus the marketing. Feynman's rule was that the first principle is you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool. Same point as my casino piece above: the market is a machine for handing you convincing stories, and the only defense is refusing to believe one you cannot explain. the film is free and anyone can watch it tonight. what nobody can give you is the discipline to admit "I named it but I don't understand it" before you put money on it. That honesty is the edge, and it is the rarest thing there is.
1:06:19

Richard Feynman, Nobel Prize-winning physicist: "You can know the name of every pattern in the market and understand nothing about why a single one works. I won a Nobel on that one distinction. it is the whole difference between an edge and a story you tell yourself." this free film is a Nobel laureate teaching you how to actually think, recorded by the BBC and free ever since. at the board it's simple. Feynman's obsession was the gap between naming a thing and understanding it. You can memorize the word for why a stock moved, "momentum", "mean reversion", and still know nothing about whether it will happen again. Real understanding means you can say why, from the mechanism up, and name what would break it. Everything else is a label pasted over ignorance. That's the whole "edge", minus the marketing. Feynman's rule was that the first principle is you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool. Same point as my casino piece above: the market is a machine for handing you convincing stories, and the only defense is refusing to believe one you cannot explain. the film is free and anyone can watch it tonight. what nobody can give you is the discipline to admit "I named it but I don't understand it" before you put money on it. That honesty is the edge, and it is the rarest thing there is.

Rossst.03

20,025 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat