Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

TimeVault automates finding information disclosure vulnerabilities by effortlessly filtering sensitive files and uncovering hidden data. Check it out: Team: @coffinxp7 @hexsh1dow haq enver #CyberSecurity #BugBounty #OSINT #hackingtools #InfoSec

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von AnonKryptiQuz
AnonKryptiQuzvor 1 Jahr

If you want to know more about this, check out the video below

Profilbild von HUDI
HUDIvor 2 Jahren

🚀 Introducing the free HUDI DataMask Breach Check! 🔍 Quickly find out if your personal data has been compromised in any breaches. Take control of your privacy effortlessly – it’s simple, secure, and entirely free. 🛡🔒 Check now and stay safe: #HUDI #DataPrivacy #BreachCheck #CyberSecurity

Profilbild von F͞a͞h͟ad
F͞a͞h͟advor 1 Jahr

@coffinxp7 @hexsh1dow @1hehaq @NahoXSS Impressive effort!

Profilbild von AnonKryptiQuz
AnonKryptiQuzvor 1 Jahr

@coffinxp7 @hexsh1dow @1hehaq @NahoXSS Thanks.

Profilbild von Paradox hunt (N.u)
Paradox hunt (N.u)vor 1 Jahr

@coffinxp7 @hexsh1dow @1hehaq @NahoXSS impressive dude

Profilbild von CNDA
CNDAvor 1 Jahr

@coffinxp7 @hexsh1dow @1hehaq @NahoXSS Will it do .org?

Profilbild von AnonKryptiQuz
AnonKryptiQuzvor 1 Jahr

@coffinxp7 @hexsh1dow @1hehaq @NahoXSS I think you're asking if the tool works on the .org top-level domain. If so, then yes.

Profilbild von baloblack
baloblackvor 1 Jahr

@coffinxp7 @hexsh1dow @1hehaq @NahoXSS Smatching

Profilbild von War observer ☢️
War observer ☢️vor 1 Jahr

@coffinxp7 @hexsh1dow @1hehaq @NahoXSS Can you report this as a bug ?

Profilbild von AnonKryptiQuz
AnonKryptiQuzvor 1 Jahr

@coffinxp7 @hexsh1dow @1hehaq @NahoXSS Yes, you could do that.

Profilbild von CNDA
CNDAvor 1 Jahr

@coffinxp7 @hexsh1dow @1hehaq @NahoXSS Anon… I have a piece of script to add to this tool if you want… it’s not as good as straight downloading the 404s…but it’s still helpful. But it’s in bash. Let me know if you want it and where I can send it to you.

Ähnliche Videos

How Health New Zealand (Te Whatu Ora) Buried Whistleblower Barry Young's Protected Disclosure. Barry Young details how he made a protected disclosure to Health New Zealand’s executive leadership team with statistical evidence suggesting serious vaccine safety issues. After extensive review with epidemiologists, doctors, and statisticians, he calculated odds of 100 billion to one against the vaccine not causing the observed signals. The handling of his Protected Disclosure reveals suppression of evidence, which would be potentially serious illegality, at the highest levels of the Ministry of Health. Barry had to raise several OIA (Official Information Act) requests to obtain the evidence that Health New Zealand had indeed received his original Protected Disclosure email, despite the evidence being "buried away in an Accenture Report, which was a Forensics Report." This is essential viewing for anyone who has concerns about government transparency, public health accountability, and Whistleblower Protections in New Zealand and beyond. Transcript: "I gave it to Health New Zealand, that was my protected disclosure... And only after doing a lot of due diligence with a lot of experts and statisticians and doctors who looked at it and I found out in hindsight I'm perfectly allowed to do that under the act to see how and whether that's important, whether to make a protected disclosure. It was all... red flag, red flag, red flag. So yes, I did put all that together, I did some crude analysis back then, getting a lot better at it now. And I just came up with some numbers that was 100 billion to one against the vaccine not causing this. I can't say for sure, I can never say that. And I sent that in an email to the executive leadership team at Health New Zealand. So of course, yeah, yeah, to make them aware of what I was saying and that formed the protected disclosure which was the whole purpose of the act, which is why we're here. Of course, they just ignored that and retaliated. In the police disclosures, I didn't even see a sign of that original email that I sent, they tried to bury it, they tried to withhold it from evidence because it was a protected disclosure. The original ELT email, the only one they did provide as evidence was the email I sent to the MPs, not knowing that that wasn't a protected disclosure. I didn't know the act at the time, but they withheld the one I sent to the executive leadership team. And the only reason that I can think of they did that was to try and avoid saying that it was a protected disclosure. They tried to bury it. I... emailed them, the Crown, the police, where's the email that I sent to the executive team? Oh no, we've sent you everything that we have. So I thought, that's a bit strange. I did send an email. ... I had to resort to writing OIA's to Health New Zealand, which they denied. They said, oh no, we didn't, there's no email sent from you at that time to these people. Your request is denied because it doesn't exist. And I wrote back to them. I said, check again, please. These are the times. These are the dates. And they said, we've gone back and we've done a thorough check and we stand by original decision. The email doesn't exist. So Health New Zealand said twice that email doesn't exist. I found it. The evidence buried away in an Accenture report, which was a forensics report. I said, hang on a minute. There's the email there in that report. Only after that did the police and the Crown reply to me. And lo and behold, there it was. The protected disclosure email... produced nearly a year after I was charged. It should have been the very first thing that they sent and [that] they dealt with. ...Looking at a protected disclosure, the way it's meant to be, they're meant to receive it and acknowledge it and reply to it. They tried to bury it."

Liz Gunn

12,711 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

‼️ BREAKING: The Revolut hacker has shared with Duel's investigation team, for the first time, a complete video showing the scale of his information treasure trove. Multiple celebrities are included in the leaks. The hacker plans to announce his ransom demands today. Here's everything we know about the case so far: - As we established in our previous posts, the hacker gained access to an Italian government email address through an infostealer. - Over the course of several months, using fake European Investigation orders, the hacker would submit large numbers of cryptocurrency transaction IDs to Revolut asking for all personal information associated with the accounts to be sent over. Revolut complied, sending hundreds of files, all belonging to high value crypto holders or transferors. - The hacker's goal was to obtain high value crypto targets. This has various potential use cases in the cyber criminal world, such as online social engineering, conducting IRL robberies, reselling the information to other criminal groups, or blackmailing Revolut directly. - The hacker says that any individual can "buy themselves" out of the data leaks. He will be publishing the ransom note without 24 hours outlining his demands from Revolut. We do not currently know what amount he will be demanding. - We asked the hacker if he feels bad about what he did and the effects this will have on victims and their privacy. His reply was: "If the ransom is not paid, then the data will be sold, and their blood will be on Revolut's hands, not mine." - A member of the hacking group known as "Smilik" had a falling out with Villain. They splintered into two channels, each one claiming to be the hacker. Smilik was unable to provide our team with sufficient evidence proving he was the original hacker. Villain provided videos, original emails with attachments, and proof that he had originally sent a subset of files to Smilik. We are satisfied that Villain is the original hacker and that his narrative is consistent. - The hacker will be contacting other journalists and investigation groups today to release the same information, allowing for the existence of the files and authenticity of the emails to be independently corroborated - Our team is under the impression that this is an amateur group that got lucky due to Revolut's lack of checks and continued incompetence over several months. This does not seem to be a professionally organized hacking group. - The partial files sent to us contained details of a famous Swedish singer and Idol finalist, a prominent Armenian academic, an Indian cricket star, and several founders and CEOs. To balance public disclosure with user privacy, our team redacted every piece of personal information from the original video before publication. We have also deleted the original information from our end. - Our understanding is that the files sent to us were just one of dozens. Each file, which comes with full banking and transaction history, would allow hackers to establish the target's daily spending patterns, location data, people they send money to (likely family, employees, or other close contacts) and more, leading to highly damaging personal disclosures. We are releasing this information in the interest of public transparency. The breach is real, and Revolut was not forthcoming enough about it in enough time. We hope Revolut takes all legal and necessary steps available to them to prevent this data from being either publicly released or sold to criminal groups, as it would be highly damaging and disastrous for victims involved. This is most of what we have for now. We'll keep an eye for any further updates, including when the ransom demand comes out.

Korra

205,400 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Last year, during tax season. I had 50+ receipts. Some in my email. Some on WhatsApp. Some in my gallery. And a few, I couldn’t even remember where I saved them. What should’ve taken a few hours turned into late nights, frustration, and second-guessing everything. Because the real problem isn’t filing taxes. It’s this: → Collecting documents → Organizing them → Verifying if everything is correct That’s where most people struggle. This year, I tried something different. Instead of chasing files everywhere, I built a simple, clean system using Wondershare PDFelement. And honestly, it changed everything. Here’s how my workflow looked. I started by scanning all my paper receipts directly from my phone using the Receipt Assistant. No manual typing. No guesswork. It automatically extracted details like: • Merchant • Date • Amount • Taxes Everything turned into searchable PDFs instantly. Then came the best part. All files were automatically saved to the cloud. So, I could: → Scan on mobile → Manage on desktop → Access everything, anytime No more “where did I save that?” moments. But what impressed me most. Every extracted detail is traceable. I could click any number and instantly jump back to the exact spot in the original receipt. No more cross-checking line by line. And when it was time to organize everything. • Exported all data into Excel → full expense overview • Merged multiple files into one clean PDF • Edited tax documents directly (no extra tools needed) Before final submission, I used: • AI Assistant → to summarize & cross-check documents • Smart Redact → to hide sensitive information Everything felt controlled, clean, and secure. That’s when it hit me: A good tax system isn’t about working harder. It’s about having a clear, traceable workflow that removes chaos. Suppose your files are still scattered across folders, emails, and screenshots. That is exactly why tax season feels exhausting. Search Wondershare PDFelement and try it free → #wondersharepdfelement #pdfelement #FileWithPDFelement #TaxSeason

Vikas Singh

11,795 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 ANTHROPIC JUST REVEALED CLAUDE MYTHOS ABILITIES Anthropic just formally announced "Claude Mythos Preview" and launched "Project Glasswing" to deploy it for cybersecurity defense. The models are unlocking completely new, autonomous behaviors. This isn't about slightly better benchmark scores. This is about what the model can do. Here are the direct quotes from Anthropic’s research team (including Dario) on exactly what Mythos is capable of: • Chaining Exploits: "It has the ability to chain together vulnerabilities... this model is able to create exploits out of three, four, sometimes five vulnerabilities that in sequence give you some kind of very sophisticated end outcome." • The Professional Standard: "The model that we're experimenting with is, by and large, as good as a professional human at identifying bugs." • Unprecedented Autonomy: "It's just generally better at pursuing really long-range tasks that are kind of like the tasks that a human security researcher would do throughout the course of an entire day." The Reality Check: Dario Amodei flat out said: "There's a kind of accelerating exponential... Claude Mythos Preview is a particularly big jump along that point." Because this model has become so capable at identifying zero-days, they are restricting its release to top tech partners to try to patch the world's software before these capabilities leak out. The autonomous researcher era has officially arrived. It’s over 💀

Chris

46,155 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Anthropic’s model found a molecular shape sitting in public data for forty years that nobody had bothered to name It was not hidden. It appears across thousands of deposited structures, in proteins that share no function and no ancestry. > SWEEP - every deposited structure read as geometry, with the biology labels stripped off > FORM - recurring three dimensional arrangements grouped purely by shape > CHECK - each group tested against the known motif catalogue to filter out the obvious > ORPHAN - the shapes that match no catalogued motif kept instead of discarded > WHERE - each orphan mapped onto what surrounds it in every protein it appears in Structural biology names motifs the way it finds them: one protein at a time, by someone who noticed. A shape that spans unrelated families gets missed. Each specialist sees it once and files it as a quirk of their own protein. Read without labels, the repetition is obvious. The same arrangement, hundreds of times, across proteins that do nothing alike. Where it sits is the interesting part. It keeps showing up at boundaries, right where one part of a protein hands off to another. That suggests it is doing something structural rather than chemical. Not a function, but a joint. Nothing is proven here. It is a named shape and a list of where to look, which is how every motif started. Public data has been scanned for sequences for decades. Almost nobody scans it for shapes nobody asked about. The shape, every family it appears in and the boundary pattern are laid out underneath.

wast3

21,278 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

A single tweet just vaporized BILLIONS from cybersecurity stocks. CrowdStrike down 8%. Cloudflare down 8.1%. Okta down 9.2%. SailPoint down 9.4%. The Global X Cybersecurity ETF just hit its lowest level since November 2023. What happened? Anthropic dropped Claude Code Security. It scans your entire codebase for vulnerabilities and suggests patches. Sounds boring. Until you read what it actually did: In testing, Claude found over 500 HIGH-SEVERITY BUGS in production open-source codebases. Bugs that had been sitting there for DECADES. Despite years of expert review. Despite fuzzing campaigns. Despite penetration testing. Despite million-dollar security audits. Nobody found them. An AI did. In hours. Here's the terrifying part: Traditional security tools work by pattern matching. They look for known vulnerabilities in a database. Claude doesn't do that. It READS code the way a human security researcher would. Traces data flows. Understands how components interact. Catches logic flaws that rule-based tools can't see. And it just outperformed every cybersecurity tool on the market. Combined. Wall Street figured this out fast. If an AI can find what your $500k/year security team missed... Why do you need the team? If an AI catches bugs that CrowdStrike, Okta, and Cloudflare couldn't... Why are you paying those subscriptions? Barclays came out saying the selloff was "illogical" and Claude "doesn't compete" with these companies. But here's what Barclays missed: It's not about what Claude competes with TODAY. It's about what it replaces TOMORROW. The SaaS apocalypse hit legal software 3 weeks ago. Thomson Reuters dropped 18% in one day. $285 billion wiped from software stocks. Now it's cybersecurity's turn. The pattern is obvious: Every industry that sells "expertise as a service" is about to get repriced. Legal research? Done. Code vulnerability scanning? Done. Compliance checking? Coming soon. Financial analysis? On deck. Companies that spent 20 years building "moats" around specialized knowledge are watching AI swim right over them. CrowdStrike is worth $95 billion. They have 30,000 customers. Claude just found 500 bugs their tools missed. Do the math. The smart money already sees what's happening. The iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF is down 23% YTD. Heading for its largest quarterly decline since the 2008 financial crisis. Not because software is dying... But because software companies that charge per-seat subscriptions for AI-replicable work are dying. Anthropic just proved that a general-purpose AI can outperform DECADES of specialized cybersecurity infrastructure. In a single product release. While still in "limited research preview." It's not even fully launched yet. What happens when it scales? We're about to find out.

Ricardo

110,899 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten