Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Today, the Gov's new Immigration System Reforms begin. But let's not forget who got us into this mess: Priti Patel & the Tories. There used to be an annual cap of 20,700 non-EU 'skilled' work visas. But Patel REMOVED this cap in her 'post-Brexit points-based system’, starting Jan 2021....

33,034 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

BREAKING: COVER UP Dept of State Scandal : The Department of State (DoS) issued 8 million non- immigrant visas to foreigners seeking entry into the United States on a “temporary” basis for tourism, medical treatment, business, temporary work, study, or other reasons. According to Dept of State, from calendar years 2020 through 2023, DOS granted non-immigrant visas to approximately 8 MILLION foreigners WITHOUT conducting IN PERSON consular interviews. Dept of State also did NOT collect fingerprints/Biometrics for an unknown number of visas during the same period. In December 2023, DOS and DHS agreed to EXPAND the categories of visas and applicants whose consular interviews could be waived beginning on January 1, 2024. In March 2024, Dos began providing DHS and CBP with information on visa holders who did NOT receive interviews. The cover up is the fact that the original 25 page DHS Office of Inspector General report that was published June 2024 has now been scrubbed to only 16 pages. Why was the original 25 page report reduced to 16 pages?? Below are some of the data images that has been scrubbed. Conclusion: The Biden admin allowed approx 8 million foreigners to enter the country WITHOUT proper inspection, fingerprinting and in person interviews !!! This is a national security risk that WILL come back and put American citizens in harms way. It’s just a matter of time. Please share this post. DHS Office of Inspector General DHS OIG Report link:

hernando arce

72,927 views • 5 months ago

‼️ "People from the East are flocking to Belarus": Lukashenka threatens the EU with a new hybrid war Belarusian dictator Alexander Lukashenka, speaking today in a church for Orthodox Christmas, once again turned to threats against EU countries. This time, he began to threaten the EU countries bordering Belarus with a new proxy war using migrants as weapons. Lukashenka claimed that "people from the East are starting to flock to Belarus." He complained about their "incompetence" and "lack of professional skills," adding that "uncontrolled migration is a disaster" for Belarus. Belarusian dictator literally admitted that Belarus is the main transit route for migrants heading to Western Europe: "There is a huge transit through us to the West, where [migrants] are trying to get to," accusing the EU of blaming it for the flow of refugees. "We will not protect anyone from migrants. Especially those who impose economic sanctions on us. Why should we protect them?" said Lukashenka. Belarusian regime is once again using migrants as a weapon against Europe, showing complete disregard for human lives. This hybrid war started in 2021 when the regime orchestrated a migration crisis on Poland's border. Thousands of refugees from Africa and the Middle East attempted to cross into Poland, often with the help of Belarusian security forces, who facilitated fence-breaking and clashes with Polish border guards. Lukashenka's bloody games cost many migrants their lives. Hundreds froze to death or starved in the forests, while thousands were injured trying to climb over border fences. According to Polish authorities, around 15,000 migrants were present in Belarus in November 2021, with 2,000 to 4,000 stranded directly at the border. Last year, the Polish Sejm significantly expanded the powers of border guards, military and police officers in the fight against illegal migration. According to the new law, law enforcement officers are allowed to use live ammunition to prevent migrants from attempting to cross the border illegally. Video: Belarus-Poland border, November 2021.

NEXTA

707,354 views • 1 year ago

2025: Elon Musk wants the European Union to be abolished 2016: That time David Cameron reminded us of the benefits of being in the EU, including the special op-out status the UK once had Comparing US states to EU countries works as a shorthand: both are smaller entities in a larger union, but unlike US states, EU countries keep their full sovereignty - here are some examples: ❌U S states gave up sovereignty to form a union ✅ EU countries keep their sovereignty 🆘 Abolishing the EU isn’t breaking up a federation, it’s attacking national sovereignty ❌ US states can’t have separate militaries ✅ EU countries maintain their own armies 🆘 Dismantling the EU wouldn’t "free states" it would undermine national sovereignty ❌ US states follow one federal constitution ✅ EU countries retain their own constitutions 🆘 Ending the EU would ignore the sovereignty each nation has carefully preserved ❌ US states can’t sign international treaties ✅ EU countries sign treaties individually and collectively 🆘 Abolishing the EU attacks their sovereignty on both national and international levels ❌ US states can’t control borders ✅ EU countries control who enters their territory 🆘 Destroying the EU would remove their border sovereignty ❌ US states rely on one federal currency ✅ EU countries, like those outside the eurozone, can keep their own money 🆘 Abolishing the EU would compromise financial sovereignty ❌ US states can’t impose independent foreign policy ✅ EU countries have independent foreign policies 🆘 Ending the EU doesn’t restore "freedom" it erodes national sovereignty ❌ US states can’t set nationwide defense policies ✅ EU countries maintain sovereignty over defence and security 🆘 Dismantling the EU threatens each nation’s sovereign decisions ❌ US states can’t maintain unique laws on education, healthcare, taxes ✅ EU countries make their own laws 🆘 Abolishing the EU ignores the sovereignty in domestic governance ❌ US states cannot leave the US ✅ EU countries can theoretically leave the union (like Brexit) 🆘 Attacking the EU’s existence is an attack on countries’ sovereign choice ❌ US states rely entirely on federal law enforcement ✅ EU countries maintain their own police and justice systems 🆘 Abolishing the EU would undermine their sovereign law enforcement ❌ US states cannot print passports or control visas ✅ EU countries issue their own passports and control immigration 🆘 Ending the EU would infringe on national sovereignty over borders ❌ US states cannot veto federal treaties ✅ EU countries vote on treaties and agreements individually 🆘 Abolishing the EU would strip countries of treaty sovereignty ❌ US states share a single central bank ✅ EU countries can keep or choose their own currencies 🆘 Destroying the EU would attack financial sovereignty ❌ US states can’t run independent foreign aid programs ✅ EU countries manage foreign aid and international development 🆘 Abolishing the EU would erode sovereign control over foreign policy ❌ US states cannot maintain their own national holidays or symbols officially ✅ EU countries preserve national symbols, holidays, and languages 🆘 Ending the EU wouldn’t restore “freedom”—it would threaten cultural and political sovereignty The EU union setup is often considered "better" than the US state system in terms of sovereignty and flexibility This allows each country to make independent decisions while still benefiting from cooperation on trade, environmental standards, and other shared policies The EU model encourages policy diversity and experimentation. Countries can implement unique social, economic, or environmental policies without conflicting with the union, whereas US states are often limited by federal law The EU balances shared governance with national sovereignty, which is why the sooner the UK rejoins the EU the better We will most likely have lost all of the opt outs we had before Brexit, maybe it's time for the UK to join the EU on a similar terms as other nations - all for one and one for all 👍

Farrukh

168,375 views • 9 months ago

Must watch interview. Ed Davey calls for a customs union with the EU to grow the UK economy And Laura Kuenssberg ends up making the case for why the UK should be in a customs union with the EU, without realising it 🤷‍♂️ LK, "Why should we have a long negotiation to go into a customs union?" ED, "People are worried about the cost of living.. And economic growth to fund e.g. the NHS" "If we have a UK-EU customs union we can grow faster than anything Rachel Reeves and Labour are saying at the moment" LK, "Who has the appetite for a long negotiation" ED, "It could be done quickly.. There would be negotiation but it wouldn't be like what we saw before.. And the benefits would come quickly" "A Youth mobility scheme.. To travel work and live across Europe, that would be good for our economy" LK, "EU proposal has no limits" ED, "We should go for a capped scheme.. Korea, Japan, Australia, they're capped schemes.. Two or three year visas" LK, "Conservative leaders found the EU wasn't open limits of migration" ED, "Conservatives leaders sold Britain out" LK, "There might be benefits to a customs union but the UK would have to follow rules of EU countries.. We would be a rule taker not a rule maker" ED, "We're already a rule taker.. Bottles with tops that have to be recycled.. That was an EU regulation, we have no voice whatsoever.. But UK based manufacturers are applying that regulation" LK, "They're choosing to so they can sell into the Eurozone" ED, "You make my point for me, they take those rules for they can market, export and grow - presumably we want to do that don't we?" LK, "European growth.. UK growth is 1%.. EU average is 1%.. Your suggestion that if we work with those countries we'd grow more, that doesn't stack up does it?" ED, "It shows Europe would be keen for a UK-EU customs union" LK, "In some countries their growth is worse than ours, in others its the same" ED, "With respect, you've shown some countries where it's worse than ours but you haven't shown EU countries where growth is better than ours" "My argument is trade deals are mutually beneficial" "Even if economies aren't growing at the moment, there's more reason we should have a trade deal" "You're playing into my own argument that a UK-EU customs union would help us, and it would be relatively easy to get" LK, "Where is your evidence the EU would want this?" ED, "My challenge to Keir Starmer is to open negotiations.. Latest by 2030 we have a full UK-EU customs union" LK, "Is this the first step for the LibDems getting us back into the EU?" ED, "Yes, we are pro European, we should be back at the heart of Europe"

Farrukh

77,320 views • 1 year ago